WOOD-RIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT Report of Performance on Assessments & Achievement September 17, 2018

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "WOOD-RIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT Report of Performance on Assessments & Achievement September 17, 2018"

Edgar Barnett
5 years ago
Views:

1 WOOD-RIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT Report of Performance on Assessments & Achievement September 17, 2018 District Ranking PARCC AP SAT PSAT NJSLA-S WIDA/ACCESS DLM Interventions

2 District Ranking: New Jersey Monthly A 10 Year Perspective

3 New Jersey Monthly** publishes the Top Public High Schools chart every two years. The chart is based on numerous factors, including student/teacher ratio; student participation in AP or International Baccalaureate classes; AP and SAT test results; and graduation rates. Year Ranking 2018 = = = = = = 101 In 2016 Wood-Ridge High School achieved a gain of 32 points. In 2018 Wood-Ridge High School achieved another gain, moving up by 40 points. Overall, Wood-Ridge High School has moved up 72 rankings in a span of 4 years! Comparisons of SBJC Districts 2018 Ranking: Becton Regional 228, Garfield 282, Hasbrouck Heights 174, Lodi 259, Lyndhurst 131, North Arlington 224, Rutherford 100, Wallington 238 **Source:

4 PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administrations Measuring College and Career Readiness 4

5 Comparison of Wood-Ridge District s Number of Students Tested Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy Grade Students Tested 2018 Students Tested 2017 Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and out of out of out of out of out of out of out of out of out of out of out of out of out of out of out of out of * 106 out of out of TOTAL 848 out of out of *Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. Note: Students Tested represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy. 5

6 Comparison of Wood-Ridge District s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Percentages Change in Change in Level 1 and Level 4 and to to ** Grade Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level * *Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. Diagonal line connects growth for the same cohort across years

7 Comparison of Wood-Ridge District s Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy to New Jersey Percentages for 2018 Grade Level 1, District Level 1, State Level 2, District Level 2, State Level 3, District Level 3, State Level 4, District Level 4, State Level 5, District Level 5, State * *Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. 7

8 Comparison of Wood-Ridge District s Number of Students Tested Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics Grade Students Tested 2018 Students Tested 2017 Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and out of out of out of out of out of out of out of out of out of out of * 67 out of out of 75-8 Algebra I 134 out of out of Algebra II 109 out of out of Geometry 88 out of out of TOTAL 826 out of out of 834 *Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8 th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. Notes: Students Tested represents individual valid test scores for Mathematics. 8

9 Comparison of Wood-Ridge District s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Percentages Change in Change in Level 1 and Level 4 and to to ** Grade Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level * ALG I GEO ALG II *Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. 9 Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. Diagonal line connects growth for the same cohort across years.alg 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

10 Comparison of Wood-Ridge District s Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics to New Jersey - Percentages for 2018 Grade Level 1, District Level 1, State Level 2, District Level 2, State Level 3, District Level 3, State Level 4, District Level 4, State Level 5, District Level 5, State * Algebra I Algebra II Geometry *Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8 th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. 10

11 Analysis of PARCC Data: Sub-group Performance

12 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 12

13 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 13

14 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 14

15 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 15

16 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 16

17 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 17

18 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 18

19 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 19

20 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 20

21 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 21

22 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 22

23 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 23

24 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 24

25 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 25

26 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 26

27 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 27

28 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 28

29 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 29

30 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 30

31 Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations 31

32 Wood-Ridge High School Performance Reports for AP, PSAT, SAT

33 ADVANCED PLACEMENT 2018 MEAN SCORES & Comparison to 2017 and 2016 Subject WR 2018 Mean Score English Language 3.57 English Literature Computer Science Prin Comp Science A 2.75 Chem 2.5 Italian Spanish Average Score st time administering test 3 WR 2016 Mean Score 3.57 United States 2018 Mean Score Calculus 1st time administering test WR 2017 Mean Score New Jersey 2018 Mean Score Stats Bold Font Scores (8 out of 10) indicate scores above District s prior year s mean, or at/above State or National Mean Score

34 Wood-Ridge AP Scores Vs. State/US

35 PSAT DATA: OCTOBER, 2017 Grade 11: 107 students Overall Score: % of students EBRW % of students MATH % of students % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 1%

36 Cohort Comparison of PSAT Scores Class of th grade PSAT % who met Benchmark Class of th grade PSAT (Current Srs) % who met Benchmark Class of th grade PSAT % who met Benchmark as 10th graders Total Score ( ) % % % EBRW Score ( ) % % % Math Score ( ) % % %

37 Current Grade 12 PSAT 2017: Fall Scores TOTAL EBRW MATH School Mean(WR Gr 11) State Mean National Mean

38 SAT Note: Data below combines Grade 11 and Grade 12 Student Performance. Grade specific cohort data has not yet been released by College Board. SAT - EBRW: WOOD-RIDGE STATE NATIONAL

39 SAT Note: Data below combines Grade 11 and Grade 12 Student Performance. Grade specific cohort data has not yet been released by College Board. SAT - MATH: WOOD-RIDGE STATE NATIONAL

40 Wood-Ridge Public School District Performance for NJSLA-S, ACCESS & DLM

41 NJSLA-S (New Jersey Student Learning Assessment-Science): Was a field test for grades 8 and 5 during the spring of As of this presentation, the NJ DOE has not published tests scores for this assessment. High School Biology course did not run last year - no state assessment was administered. ACCESS FOR ELL s: 21 Students participated in the WIDA ACCESS Assessment. 3 of the 21 Students (14%) achieved a score of 4.5, demonstrating Proficiency. DYNAMIC LEARNING MAPS (DLM): 4 Out-of-District participated in a DLM Assessment. With a population size less than 10 students, there is no district DLM report.

42 INTERVENTIONS: Past, Present, Future

Data Analysis: Trends and Shifts, and Increase in Participation Rate Benchmark Assessments and Grades: -STAR Reading -STAR Math -Quarterly review of Grade Distribution Reports Student Academic Plans

43 Data Analysis: Trends and Shifts, and Increase in Participation Rate Benchmark Assessments and Grades: -STAR Reading -STAR Math -Quarterly review of Grade Distribution Reports Student Academic Plans (SAPs): Policy and Practice Curriculum & Instruction: Curriculum Reviews, Pacing Guides, Instructional Coaching, and Professional Development, Increases in: Staff, Instructional Time for English & Math in Grades 7 & 8, Course Offerings, Supplemental & Online Resources, Instructional Tools & Platforms, STEM Academy, Social-Emotional Learning Programs (Elevate Education, Sanford Harmony) Title I Services (including ELLs): - Response To Intervention (RTI) - Extended School Day - Extended School Year/Summer Transition Program - Title I Parent meetings - School-Parent Compact AP/SAT/PSAT: Test prep programs: cost saving options, varied time offerings, varied service providers, guidance counseling services focusing on career and college readiness for all students ELL s: Extended School Day Services, Entrance Screening, Exit Performance, Dual Language Online Resources

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent Making Education Work for All of Georgia s Students College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12 CONTENT MASTERY (END of COURSE TESTS