Cooper Upper Elementary School
|
|
- Rose Anderson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Annual Education Report BOARD OF EDUCATION Colleen Burton, President Dianne Laura, Vice President Tammy Bonifield, Secretary Dan Centers, Trustee Liz Jarvis, Trustee Mark Johnson, Trustee Eileen McDonnell, Trustee Andrea L. Oquist, Superintendent 2855 Ann Arbor Trail Westland, MI Theresa O Brien, Principal Sarah Aherne, Principal Marjorie Moore, Kristi Principal Collyer, Assistant Principal
2 15125 Farmington Road Livonia MI Phone (734) March 1, 217 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the Annual Education Report (AER) which provides key information on the educational progress for. The AER addresses the complex reporting information required by federal and state laws. The school s report contains information about student assessment, accountability and teacher quality. If you have any questions about the AER, please contact the Principal of, for assistance. The AER is available for you to review electronically by visiting the following web site or you may review a copy in the main office of our school. For the year, no new Priority or Focus schools were named by the Michigan Department of Education; some Priority or Focus schools did exit their status because they met the exit criteria. New Reward schools were identified using school rankings and Beating the Odds information. A Focus school is one that has a large achievement gap between the highest and lowest achieving 3% of schools. A Priority school is one whose achievement and growth is in the lowest 5% of all schools in the state. A Reward school is one that has achieved one or more of the following distinctions: top 5% of schools on the Top-to-Bottom School Rankings, top 5% of schools making the greatest gains in achievement (improvement metric), or Beating the Odds by outperforming the school s predicted ranking and/or similar schools. Some schools are not identified with any of these labels. In these cases no label is given. Our school has not been given one of these labels. The AER has two major sections to it that are required by state law. The information contained in the first section was compiled by district staff. It presents relevant information about our district, our academic programs, school improvement efforts, two years of results on district developed assessments and nationally norm referenced assessments. It also includes the district s parent involvement policy and specialized programs. The second section of the report contains information provided by the Michigan Department of Education. Based on this data, our school has identified underperforming subgroups of students, including economically disadvantaged students for whom additional intervention and support is needed in order to increase their proficiency and to close the achievement gap in the targeted areas. In order to accelerate student achievement, Cooper Upper Elementary has put in place is a multi-tiered system of support that provides supplemental instruction to our most at risk students through our Title I literacy and math support groups during the summer and throughout the school year. In addition, we will be addressing the achievement gap for our economically disadvantaged students by providing ongoing professional development on teaching students of poverty. Finally, continuous analysis of formative assessments to determine the needs of all students, followed by the provision of targeted learning intervention to students in need is being undertaken to close persistent gaps in achievement. These initiatives are intended to accelerate the student achievement of subgroups, including the state s Bottom 3%, that are not meeting our school s proficiency targets. 2
3 Our collaborative efforts positively impact our school s success and student achievement. Sincerely, Theresa O Brien Principal Livonia Public Schools prohibits unlawful discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, height, weight, marital status, handicap or disability in any of its educational programs or activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquires and grievances regarding discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, height, weight, and marital status-director of Human Resources, Farmington Road, Livonia, MI at (734) The following person has been designated to handle inquires and grievances regarding discrimination based on handicap or disability-director of Student Services, Farmington Road, Livonia, MI at (734) MISSION STATEMENT Everyone Learning, Everyone Leading, Together. VISION Cooper will become an innovative and collaborative environment where students, staff, parents, and community work together to create an authentic learning environment that differentiates and sets high expectations for future leaders to find their voice while providing structure and safety that respects the needs of all. SCHOOL PROFILE serves 686 students in grades 5 and 6. The principal at during was Ms. Sarah Aherne. The principal beginning is Mrs. Theresa O Brien and the assistant principal is Ms. Kristi Collyer. There are 33 professional teaching staff members and one media specialist. In addition, there are the following professional support staff members: a school psychologist, a school social worker, one learning specialist, one Elementary Student Assistance Provider (E.S.A.P.), a speech and language therapist, as well as homebound or hospitalized services. 3
4 State law requires that we report the following additional information. ASSIGNING PUPILS TO THE SCHOOL All students are assigned to based upon residence within the geographic boundaries of the school, as well as students who transfer to Cooper based on space availability. SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT School improvement is a process in which stakeholders in a school work cooperatively to improve student achievement. The process relies on parents, staff, and students participating in collaborative decision making. The goals are determined through analysis of student achievement data and survey information. Action plans using proven interventions are developed for each improvement goal and progress toward achievement of the goals is documented annually. Our goals for the and school year are: 1. All Cooper students will be proficient in basic math computation with precision and fluency. 2. All Cooper students will be proficient in informational reading. 3. All Cooper students will be proficient in writing. The Livonia Public Schools School District has had its District Level accreditation through AdvanceEd. Through the district accreditation process, also received AdvancED accreditation. The AdvancED accreditation process supports and validates district and school level improvement efforts. SPECIALIZED SCHOOLS OR PROGRAMS At the elementary level, students may be enrolled in Alternative Classrooms for the Academically Talented (ACAT) at Webster Elementary School and special education centers at Buchanan, Cass, Coolidge, Kennedy, Johnson and Webster. Preschool special education programs are located at various locations in the district. Other special education programs are available in western Wayne County for our students with disabilities, based upon their individual needs. Niji-Iro Japanese Immersion Elementary School is also available. A preschool is operated at the Jackson Center. Specific information about these programs is available on the district Web site at CORE CURRICULUM The core curriculum at Cooper Upper Elementary provides learning experiences in reading, writing, speaking, listening, spelling, handwriting, mathematics, social studies, science, technology, health, physical education, art, instrumental music, vocal music, library/research skills and enrichment activities. The core curriculum is based on the grade level content expectations (GLCEs) from the 4
5 Michigan Department of Education and the Common Core State Standards for and English Language Arts. The goal of education is to provide all learners with a solid foundation of skills, knowledge, and understandings that are necessary for their continual growth and success as students within the school setting and as adults in society. As a result of sound K-12 education based on well-defined educational outcomes, a Livonia Public School graduate will: Respect self, others, and the environment. Communicate effectively. Know how to learn and work productively. Acquire and process information. Use critical and creative thinking to make decisions and solve problems. Work and participate independently and cooperatively. Acquire a core of understanding and competencies within the content areas. A copy of the core curriculum may be obtained from the district s Academic Services Department. STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT ON DISTRICT DEVELOPED AND NATIONAL ASSESSMENTS DISTRICT LITERACY ASSESSMENTS Students in grades 5-6 are assessed using the Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System. Teachers administer running records with comprehension to students one-on-one a minimum of two times each year. The following table shows the percent of students at each grade level that performed at or above grade level on this assessment. FOUNTAS AND PINNELL BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS GRADES 5-6 Percent of Students that Performed At or Above Grade Level Spring 216 Grade 5 Grade 6 Cooper 87% 83% District 88% 85% Spring 215 Grade 5 Grade 6 Cooper 86% 87% District 87% 88% DISTRICT MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS Students in grades 1-6 were assessed on their attainment of grade level mathematics standards three times during the school year using the i-ready Math Diagnostic Assessment. The following chart show the percentage of students who were on or above grade level on the spring i-ready Diagnostic Assessment. 5
6 i-ready MATHEMATICS Percent of Students On or Above Grade Level Grade 5 Grade 6 Cooper 32.% 21.% District 46.% 31.% Students were assessed in mathematics knowledge twice during the school year. Students in grades 1-5 were assessed using a Pre/Post online assessment. The following data show the percentage of students who were proficient at each grade level on the Pre/Post mathematics benchmark assessment. MATHEMATICS BENCHMARK: ELEMENTARY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 5 Percent of Students Proficient Numbers & Numeration Operations & Computations Measurement Reference Frames Patterns, Functions, Algebra Data & Chance Geometry Total* Pre-Test Cooper 46% 49% 47% 5% 51% 65% 5% District 49% 53% 5% 54% 53% 67% 54% Post-Test Cooper 6% 64% 58% 65% 59% 76% 63% District 69% 71% 64% 71% 64% 78% 7% *Total score indicates proficiency in all 6 strands. NORM REFERENCED ASSESSMENT The Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS) and the Cognitive Ability Test (CogAT) from Riverside Publishing are administered to sixth grade students. ITBS GRADE 6 Median Grade Equivalent Score Reading All Students Male Female All Students Male Female Cooper District Cooper District
7 CogAT GRADE 6 Age Percentiles Verbal Quantitative Nonverbal Composite Cooper District Cooper District PARENT TEACHER CONFERENCES One of the most important factors in success in school for a child is the involvement of the parent or guardian in the educational process. Parent-teacher conferences were attended by 93% (682 conferences held) of our parents during and 89% during Cooper Upper Elementary parental involvement also includes attendance at our Curriculum Nights, Art Fair, Vocal and Instrumental Music Concerts, Title I, and The Leader In Me events. Open House attendance was 85% during and 83% during PARENT INVOLVEMENT The district s Parent Involvement Plan is available on the district s website, which is linked to each school s website. BOARD POLICY IDD(1) PARENT INVOLVEMENT JUNE 2, 211 The Board strongly encourages and welcomes the involvement of parent(s)/guardian(s) in all of the District s educational programs. It is recognized and appreciated that parents/guardians are the first teachers of their children, and that their interest and involvement in the education of their children should not diminish once their child enters the schools of the District. Accordingly, the Board directs, by the adoption of this policy, that the administration shall design a program/plan that will encourage parent(s)/guardian(s) participation that may include, but not be limited to: The development and review of instructional materials; input on the ways that the District may better provide parent(s)/guardian(s) with information concerning current laws, regulations, and instructional programs; and District offerings of training programs to instruct parent(s)/guardian(s) how to become more involved in their child s educational programs. Pursuant to state law, the Superintendent shall provide a copy of the District s Parental Involvement plan to all parents. Reference: 2 USCA 6316, 2 USCA 6318 (No Child Left Behind Act) 7
8 DATA FROM MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION These reports contain the following information: Student Assessment Data Includes the following three assessments: M-STEP (Michigan Student Test of Educational Progress), MI-Access (Alternate Assessment), and College Board SAT. Presents assessment information for English language arts and mathematics for grades 3 to 8 and 11, and science for grades 4, 7, and 11, compared to state averages for all students as well as subgroups of students. The report helps users to understand achievement performance within grades and schools, and to make comparisons to district, state, and national achievement benchmarks. Accountability Scorecard Detail Data and Status The accountability portion of the AER includes assessment proficiency and participation rates, graduation or attendance rates, as well as accountability scorecard status. Teacher Qualification Data Identifies teacher qualifications at district and school levels Reports percentage of core academic classes taught by teachers not considered highly qualified to teach such classes NAEP Data (National Assessment of Educational Progress) Provides state results of the national assessment in mathematics and reading every other year in grades 4 and 8 The following pages are provided by the Michigan Department of Education and cannot be amended, modified or adjusted. They must be included as provided by the state. 8
9 2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State Percent Students Proficient District Percent Students Proficient School Percent Students Proficient Percent Advanced Percent Proficient Percent Partially Proficient Percent Not Proficient All Students % 5.2% 35.9% 7.1% 28.8% 29.1% 35.% All Students % 51.2% 4.3% 1.5% 29.8% 28.3% 31.4% Indian or Alaska Native % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian % 72.7% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian % 69.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African % 23.7% 25.8% 3.2% 22.6% 22.6% 51.6% Black or African % 18.8% 22.2% 3.7% 18.5% 4.7% 37.% Hispanic of Any Race % 45.5% 33.3% 9.5% 23.8% 38.1% 28.6% Hispanic of Any Race % 4.4% 28.% 12.% 16.% 4.% 32.% Two or More Races % 48.5% 21.4%.% 21.4% 35.7% 42.9% Two or More Races % 45.2% 36.8% 5.3% 31.6% 36.8% 26.3% White % 52.3% 38.2% 7.7% 3.5% 28.4% 33.3% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 1 of 31
10 2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 White % 55.7% 44.% 11.2% 32.8% 24.8% 31.2% Female % 56.1% 4.6% 8.% 32.6% 33.1% 26.3% Female % 6.3% 49.3% 13.% 36.3% 3.1% 2.5% Male % 44.6% 31.3% 6.1% 25.1% 25.1% 43.6% Male % 42.5% 33.% 8.4% 24.6% 26.8% 4.2% % 3.2% 24.8% 5.3% 19.5% 3.8% 44.4% % 37.9% 37.4% 7.3% 3.1% 28.5% 34.1% English Language Learners % 17.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners % 29.6% 2.%.% 2.% 2.% 6.% Students With Disabilities % 13.6% 8.5% 6.4% 2.1% 23.4% 68.1% Students With Disabilities % 16.7% 17.1% 2.9% 14.3% 17.1% 65.7% All Students % 52.2% 42.8% 9.7% 33.1% 33.1% 24.2% All Students % 47.7% 34.% 8.2% 25.8% 3.6% 35.4% Asian % 74.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 2 of 31
11 2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 Asian % 75.% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African % 39.% 33.3% 8.3% 25.% 25.% 41.7% Black or African % 21.9% 29.6% 3.7% 25.9% 25.9% 44.4% Hispanic of Any Race % 4.% 44.% 8.% 36.% 24.% 32.% Hispanic of Any Race % 44.6% 3.4% 8.7% 21.7% 34.8% 34.8% Two or More Races % 44.4% 5.% 14.3% 35.7% 14.3% 35.7% Two or More Races % 56.7% 38.5%.% 38.5% 23.1% 38.5% White % 53.3% 42.7% 9.7% 33.% 35.4% 21.9% White % 49.1% 34.1% 9.1% 25.1% 31.4% 34.5% Female % 54.1% 44.4% 1.6% 33.9% 34.4% 21.2% Female % 55.4% 39.7% 11.5% 28.2% 32.2% 28.2% Male % 5.4% 4.9% 8.8% 32.2% 31.6% 27.5% Male % 4.3% 28.5% 5.% 23.5% 29.1% 42.5% % 38.6% 35.1% 6.7% 28.4% 29.1% 35.8% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 3 of 31
12 2/8/217 M-STEP Grades % 3.6% 28.6% 4.5% 24.1% 25.6% 45.9% English Language Learners % 25.% 1.% 1.%.% 6.% 3.% English Language Learners % 9.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Students With Disabilities % 8.2% 4.9%.% 4.9% 29.3% 65.9% Students With Disabilities % 14.7% 11.8% 5.9% 5.9% 14.7% 73.5% All Students % 45.2% 29.7% 13.% 16.7% 34.8% 35.4% All Students % 44.9% 3.1% 1.1% 19.9% 38.3% 31.6% Indian or Alaska Native % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian % 75.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian % 69.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African % 14.5% 22.6% 6.5% 16.1% 16.1% 61.3% Black or African % 8.8% 11.1% 3.7% 7.4% 44.4% 44.4% Hispanic of Any Race % 49.1% 4.% 15.% 25.% 4.% 2.% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 4 of 31
13 2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 Hispanic of Any Race % 37.7% 3.8% 19.2% 11.5% 23.1% 46.2% Two or More Races % 45.5% 21.4%.% 21.4% 28.6% 5.% Two or More Races % 33.3% 31.6% 15.8% 15.8% 36.8% 31.6% White % 46.7% 3.5% 14.4% 16.1% 36.5% 33.% White % 49.6% 31.6% 9.2% 22.4% 4.% 28.4% Female % 45.1% 28.2% 11.5% 16.7% 33.9% 37.9% Female % 45.9% 29.9% 7.5% 22.4% 42.2% 27.9% Male % 45.3% 31.3% 14.5% 16.8% 35.8% 33.% Male % 43.9% 3.2% 12.3% 17.9% 35.2% 34.6% % 24.2% 21.1% 9.% 12.% 33.8% 45.1% % 25.9% 2.3% 6.5% 13.8% 43.1% 36.6% English Language Learners % 26.7% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners % 31.% 9.1%.% 9.1% 36.4% 54.5% Students With Disabilities % 16.2% 12.8% 6.4% 6.4% 25.5% 61.7% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 5 of 31
14 2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 Students With Disabilities % 13.9% 11.8%.% 11.8% 14.7% 73.5% All Students % 44.7% 32.% 15.2% 16.9% 38.2% 29.8% All Students % 43.8% 28.2% 7.3% 2.9% 39.8% 31.9% Asian % 7.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian % 71.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African % 14.6% 8.3% 4.2% 4.2% 25.% 66.7% Black or African % 12.5% 18.5%.% 18.5% 25.9% 55.6% Hispanic of Any Race % 25.5% 28.% 12.% 16.% 48.% 24.% Hispanic of Any Race % 4.% 3.4% 17.4% 13.% 47.8% 21.7% Two or More Races % 36.1% 35.7% 28.6% 7.1% 28.6% 35.7% Two or More Races % 43.3% 15.4%.% 15.4% 46.2% 38.5% White % 47.8% 34.2% 15.5% 18.7% 38.7% 27.1% White % 46.% 29.9% 7.6% 22.2% 39.9% 3.2% Female % 43.3% 3.1% 11.8% 18.3% 39.8% 3.1% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 6 of 31
15 2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 Female % 43.1% 23.6% 5.2% 18.4% 4.8% 35.6% Male % 46.% 34.1% 18.8% 15.3% 36.5% 29.4% Male % 44.6% 32.8% 9.4% 23.3% 38.9% 28.3% % 24.8% 2.6% 9.9% 1.7% 35.9% 43.5% % 19.6% 13.5% 1.5% 12.% 42.1% 44.4% English Language Learners % 18.2% 1.%.% 1.% 3.% 6.% English Language Learners % 13.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Students With Disabilities % 4.1%.%.%.% 26.8% 73.2% Students With Disabilities % 14.2% 8.8% 2.9% 5.9% 14.7% 76.5% All Students % 2.1% 9.4% 1.4% 8.% 64.2% 26.4% All Students % 19.3% 11.3%.3% 11.% 67.3% 21.4% Indian or Alaska Native % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian % 36.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian % 17.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 7 of 31
16 2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 Black or African % 4.% 6.5%.% 6.5% 51.6% 41.9% Black or African % 7.5% 7.1%.% 7.1% 57.1% 35.7% Hispanic of Any Race % 13.% 15.% 5.% 1.% 75.% 1.% Hispanic of Any Race % 13.2% 11.5%.% 11.5% 5.% 38.5% Two or More Races % 21.2%.%.%.% 42.9% 57.1% Two or More Races % 16.7% 15.8%.% 15.8% 63.2% 21.1% White % 21.3% 9.9% 1.4% 8.5% 65.8% 24.3% White % 21.4% 11.6%.4% 11.2% 7.% 18.4% Female % 18.4% 8.%.6% 7.5% 69.% 23.% Female % 16.9% 7.4%.% 7.4% 73.% 19.6% Male % 21.6% 1.7% 2.2% 8.4% 59.6% 29.8% Male % 21.6% 14.5%.6% 14.% 62.6% 22.9% % 8.6% 3.%.% 3.% 64.4% 32.6% % 9.2% 11.1%.% 11.1% 61.9% 27.% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 8 of 31
17 2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 English Language Learners %.% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners %.%.%.%.% 7.% 3.% Students With Disabilities % 1.1% 4.3% 2.1% 2.1% 42.6% 53.2% Students With Disabilities % 6.4% 2.7%.% 2.7% 48.6% 48.6% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 9 of 31
18 2/8/217 SAT Location Name School Year Subject Student Group Mean SAT Score Benchmark Met or Exceeded % Met or Exceeded Did Not Meet % Did Not Meet Number Assessed No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 1 of 31
19 2/8/217 MI-Access Functional Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State Percent Students Proficient District Percent Students Proficient School Percent Students Proficient Percent Surpassed Percent Attained Percent Emerging All Students % 5.% 4.%.% 4.% 6.% All Students % 77.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 All Students % 36.4% 3.%.% 3.% 7.% All Students % 58.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 All Students % 2.% 2.%.% 2.% 8.% Asian % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Hispanic of Any Race % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Hispanic of Any Race % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 11 of 31
20 2/8/217 MI-Access Functional Independence Hispanic of Any Race % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 White % 45.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 White % 78.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 White % 25.% <1 <1 <1 <1 White % 69.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 White % 18.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Male % 53.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 Male % 81.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 Male % 41.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 Male % 7.% <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 12 of 31
21 2/8/217 MI-Access Functional Independence Male % 18.8% <1 <1 <1 < % <1 <1 <1 <1 < % <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 3.% <1 <1 <1 < % 6.% <1 <1 <1 < % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 All Students % 53.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 All Students % 5.% <1 <1 <1 <1 White % 63.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 White % 6.% <1 <1 <1 <1 Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 13 of 31
22 2/8/217 MI-Access Functional Independence Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Male % 54.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 Male % 5.% <1 <1 <1 < % 4.% <1 <1 <1 < % 4.% <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 14 of 31
23 2/8/217 MI-Access Supported Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State Percent Students Proficient District Percent Students Proficient School Percent Students Proficient Percent Surpassed Percent Attained Percent Emerging No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 15 of 31
24 2/8/217 MI-Access Participation Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State Percent Students Proficient District Percent Students Proficient School Percent Students Proficient Percent Surpassed Percent Attained Percent Emerging All Students % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 All Students % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Male % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Male % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 16 of 31
25 2/8/217 Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Subject State Tested Total State Percent Proficient District Tested Total District Percent Proficient* School Tested Total School Percent Proficient** All Students 98.7% 69.6% 99.4% 75.2% 99.% 58.4% All Students 98.6% 62.1% 99.3% 71.6% 98.8% 58.8% All Students Science 98.1% 5.% 99.1% 6.% N/A N/A All Students 98.1% 59.3% 99.% 68.1% 98.2% 31.7% Bottom 3% N/A 25.1% N/A 22.1% N/A 7.1% Bottom 3% N/A 19.% N/A 17.% N/A 15.6% Bottom 3% Science N/A 9.8% N/A 13.4% N/A N/A Bottom 3% N/A 13.3% N/A 16.2% N/A.% Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native 98.4% 63.4% <3 <3 <3 <3 98.4% 55.9% <3 <3 <3 <3 Science 98.% 46.3% <3 <3 N/A N/A 97.3% 54.5% <3 <3 <3 <3 Asian 99.3% 84.3% 99.3% 84.4% <3 <3 Asian 99.4% 83.7% 99.7% 86.% <3 <3 Asian Science 99.3% 65.5% 1.% 78.1% N/A N/A Asian 99.3% 76.% 1.% 76.8% <3 <3 Black or African Black or African Black or African Black or African Hispanic of Any Race Hispanic of Any Race Hispanic of Any Race 97.7% 46.9% 99.2% 56.4% 98.2% 5.9% 97.4% 37.3% 98.9% 47.4% 96.4% 55.8% Science 96.5% 23.9% 99.7% 34.1% N/A N/A 96.6% 33.6% 98.6% 46.% <3 <3 98.8% 6.8% 99.7% 72.9% 1.% 71.4% 98.8% 51.1% 99.7% 63.9% 1.% 51.2% Science 98.1% 36.7% 99.3% 54.4% N/A N/A A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 17 of 31
26 2/8/217 Accountability Details Subject Data Hispanic of Any Race Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races Two or More Races Two or More Races Two or More Races 98.% 47.7% 98.7% 62.4% <3 <3 99.5% 72.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A 99.7% 65.9% N/A N/A N/A N/A Science 99.7% 59.6% N/A N/A N/A N/A 99.6% 65.7% N/A N/A N/A N/A 98.9% 67.8% 1.% 69.9% 1.% 56.7% 98.7% 59.2% 99.6% 69.1% 97.% 66.7% Science 98.5% 45.2% 1.% 6.5% N/A N/A 98.5% 57.3% 1.% 65.% <3 <3 White 99.% 75.6% 99.3% 77.1% 98.9% 58.2% White 98.9% 68.4% 99.3% 74.1% 99.1% 59.3% White Science 98.6% 57.1% 98.9% 62.2% N/A N/A White 98.5% 65.8% 99.% 7.6% 98.% 33.7% English Language Learners English Language Learners 98.3% 56.8% 99.2% 62.7% 98.5% 54.1% 98.2% 48.5% 99.1% 57.2% 97.7% 51.% Science 97.5% 35.% 99.% 46.4% N/A N/A 97.5% 43.9% 98.6% 53.8% 98.4% 23.9% 98.8% 49.5% 99.3% 59.3% <3 <3 99.% 48.4% 99.3% 66.9% <3 <3 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 18 of 31
27 2/8/217 Accountability Details Subject Data English Language Learners English Language Learners Students With Disabilities Students With Disabilities Students With Disabilities Students With Disabilities Science 98.5% 22.% 99.1% 35.% N/A N/A 98.2% 3.9% 97.4% 42.3% <3 <3 97.2% 4.1% 99.% 47.3% 98.6% 42.1% 97.1% 36.5% 98.8% 42.1% 97.2% 46.2% Science 97.% 26.5% 98.3% 35.% N/A N/A 96.6% 3.8% 98.6% 39.3% 1.% 18.9% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 19 of 31
28 2/8/217 Accountability Details Graduation Data Student Group Statewide District School All Students 79.79% 91.33% N/A Indian or Alaska Native 7.88% N/A N/A Asian 9.77% 1.% N/A Black or African 67.31% 78.85% N/A Hispanic of Any Race 72.7% 81.58% N/A Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 76.67% N/A N/A Two or More Races 74.74% 92.86% N/A White 83.48% 92.53% N/A Female 83.76% N/A N/A Male 76.% N/A N/A 67.48% 83.% N/A English Language Learners 72.14% N/A N/A Students With Disabilities 57.12% 61.81% N/A Bottom 3% N/A N/A N/A * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 2 of 31
29 2/8/217 Accountability Details Attendance Data Student Group Statewide District School All Students 94.32% 96.% 95.63% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 21 of 31
30 2/8/217 Accountability Status District Data District Name Status Score Math Status Math Score Science Status Science Score Social Studies Status Social Studies Score Overall Status Overall Score No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 22 of 31
31 2/8/217 Accountability Status School Data School Name Status Score Math Status Math Score Science Status Science Score Social Studies Status Social Studies Score Overall Status Overall Score Cooper Upper Elementary School Green 2 Green 2 Green 2 Lime 42 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 23 of 31
32 2/8/217 Teacher Quality - Qualification Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School Other B.A. M.A. P.H.D Professional Qualifications are defined by the State and may include information such as the degrees of public school teachers (e.g., percentage of teachers with Bachelors Degrees or Masters Degrees) or the percentage of fully certified teachers Teacher Quality - Class School Aggregate High-Poverty Schools Low-Poverty Schools Percentage of Core Academic Subject Elementary and Secondary School Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers.% N/A N/A Teacher Quality - Provisional Certification Percent Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School with Emergency Certification.% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 24 of 31
33 2/8/217 NAEP Grade 4 Math Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students Male Female National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available # Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races # &# ‡ Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL Reporting Standards not met. Note: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 215 Achievement A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 25 of 31
34 2/8/217 NAEP Grade 8 Math Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students Male Female National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available # Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races # # 4 32 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD # 7 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 215 Achievement A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 26 of 31
35 2/8/217 NAEP Grade 12 Math Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students Male Female National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 215 Achievement A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 27 of 31
36 2/8/217 NAEP Grade 4 Reading Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students Male Female National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available # Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races # Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD # 6 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 215 Reading Assessment A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 28 of 31
37 2/8/217 NAEP Grade 8 Reading Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students Male Female National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available # Race/Ethnicity White Black or Afican Hispanic Asian/Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Indian or Alaska Native Two or More Races &# Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD # 3 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 215 Reading Assessment # 3 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 29 of 31
38 2/8/217 NAEP Grade 12 Reading Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students Male Female National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 215 Reading Assessment A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 3 of 31
39 2/8/217 NAEP Participation Data Grade Subject Participation Rate for Students with Disabilities Standard Error Participation Rate for Limited English Proficient Students Standard Error 4 Math Reading Math Reading A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 31 of 31
Cooper Upper Elementary School
LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS www.livoniapublicschools.org/cooper 213-214 BOARD OF EDUCATION 213-14 Mark Johnson, President Colleen Burton, Vice President Dianne Laura, Secretary Tammy Bonifield, Trustee Dan
More informationShelters Elementary School
Shelters Elementary School August 2, 24 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER) which provides key information on the 23-24 educational progress for the Shelters
More informationComing in. Coming in. Coming in
212-213 Report Card for Glenville High School SCHOOL DISTRICT District results under review by the Ohio Department of Education based upon 211 findings by the Auditor of State. Achievement This grade combines
More informationIowa School District Profiles. Le Mars
Iowa School District Profiles Overview This profile describes enrollment trends, student performance, income levels, population, and other characteristics of the public school district. The report utilizes
More informationStatus of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine
Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine The figures and tables below are based upon the latest publicly available data from AAMC, NSF, Department of Education and the US Census Bureau.
More informationAnnual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent
Annual Report to the Public Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent 1 Conway Board of Education Ms. Susan McNabb Mr. Bill Clements Mr. Chuck Shipp Mr. Carl Barger Dr. Adam Lamey Dr. Quentin Washispack Mr. Andre
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST, ILLINOIS and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. 2 7 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest, ILLINOIS 2 8 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year.
More informationFile Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10
Success - Key Measures Graduation Rate: 4-, 5-, and 6-Year 9. First-time, full-time entering, degree-seeking, students enrolled in a minimum of 12 SCH their first fall semester who have graduated from
More informationPsychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability
August 2012 Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability Linking Measures of Academic Progress in Mathematics and Maryland School Assessment in Mathematics Huafang Zhao, Ph.D. This brief
More informationStudent Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools
Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools Introduction The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (ESE) calculates and reports mobility rates as part of its overall
More informationEducational Attainment
A Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile of Allen County, Indiana based on the 2010 Census and the American Community Survey Educational Attainment A Review of Census Data Related to the Educational Attainment
More informationStudent Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation
Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist and Bethany L. McCaffrey, Ph.D., Interim Director of Research and Evaluation Evaluation
More informationPort Graham El/High. Report Card for
School: District: Kenai Peninsula Grades: K - 12 School Enrollment: 20 Title I School? No Title 1 Program: Accreditation: Report Card for 2008-2009 A Title 1 school receives federal money in support low-achieving
More informationJohn F. Kennedy Middle School
John F. Kennedy Middle School CUPERTINO UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT Steven Hamm, Principal hamm_steven@cusdk8.org School Address: 821 Bubb Rd. Cupertino, CA 95014-4938 (408) 253-1525 CDS Code: 43-69419-6046890
More informationNewburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan
Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic Academic Intervention Services Plan Revised September 2016 October 2015 Newburgh Enlarged City School District Elementary Academic Intervention Services
More informationA Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education
A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education Note: Additional information regarding AYP Results from 2003 through 2007 including a listing of each individual
More informationMiami-Dade County Public Schools
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND THEIR ACADEMIC PROGRESS: 2010-2011 Author: Aleksandr Shneyderman, Ed.D. January 2012 Research Services Office of Assessment, Research, and Data Analysis 1450 NE Second Avenue,
More informationUniversity of Arizona
Annual Report Submission View Questionnaire (Edit) University of Arizona Annual Report Submission for the year 2009. Report has been submitted 1 times. Report was last submitted on 11/30/2009 7:12:09 PM.
More informationhttps://secure.aacte.org/apps/peds/print_all_forms.php?view=report&prin...
1 of 35 4/25/2012 9:56 AM A» 2011 PEDS» Institutional Data inst id: 3510 Institutional Data A_1 Institutional Information This information will be used in all official references to your institution. Institution
More informationSunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2014-15 School Year Published During 2015-16 By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by
More informationDemographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups
Appendix F Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups Demographic Survey--Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Discussion Group Demographic Survey Faculty with Disabilities Discussion Group Demographic Survey
More informationKansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance
Kansas State Department of Education Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance Based on Elementary & Secondary Education Act, No Child Left Behind (P.L. 107-110) Revised May 2010 Revised May
More informationSchool Performance Plan Middle Schools
SY 2012-2013 School Performance Plan Middle Schools 734 Middle ALternative Program @ Lombard, Principal Roger Shaw (Interim), Executive Director, Network Facilitator PLEASE REFER TO THE SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
More informationHokulani Elementary School
Hokulani Elementary Code: 109 Status and Improvement Report Year -11 Contents Focus On Standards Grades K-5 This Status and Improvement Report has been prepared as part of the Department's education accountability
More informationWisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Main takeaways from the 2015 NAEP 4 th grade reading exam: Wisconsin scores have been statistically flat
More information2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND
Report from the Office of Student Assessment 31 November 29, 2012 2012 ACT RESULTS AUTHOR: Douglas G. Wren, Ed.D., Assessment Specialist Department of Educational Leadership and Assessment OTHER CONTACT
More informationPresident Abraham Lincoln Elementary School
Code: 134 President Abraham Lincoln Elementary Status and Improvement Report Year -04 Focus On Standards Grades K-5 Focus on Standards Description Contents p. 1 p. 1 This Status and Improvement Report
More informationDATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P
TITLE III REQUIREMENTS STATE POLICY DEFINITIONS DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITY IDENTIFICATION OF LEP STUDENTS A district that receives funds under Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act shall comply with the
More informationState of New Jersey
OVERVIEW 1213 GRADE SPAN KG6 116946 GALLOWAY, NEW JERSEY 85 This school's academic performance is about average when compared to schools across the state. Additionally, its academic performance is very
More informationAPPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HEALTH CAREERS OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM College Science Enrichment Program (CSEP) & Pre-Enrollment Support Program (PESP) Website: http://www.mu.edu/hcop INSTRUCTIONS: Please type or print
More informationThe Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016
The Condition of College and Career Readiness This report looks at the progress of the 16 ACT -tested graduating class relative to college and career readiness. This year s report shows that 64% of students
More informationData Diskette & CD ROM
Data File Format Data Diskette & CD ROM Texas Assessment of Academic Skills Fall 2002 through Summer 2003 Exit Level Test Administrations Attention Macintosh Users To accommodate Macintosh systems a delimiter
More informationFrank Phillips College. Accountability Report
Frank Phillips College Accountability Report January 2016 Accountability System, January 2016 1 of 22 Participation - Key Measures Enrollment 1. Fall Headcount (Unduplicated) Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015
More informationNew Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)
New Student Application Name High School Date Received (official use only) Thank you for your interest in Project SEARCH! By completing the attached application materials, you are taking the next step
More informationKahului Elementary School
Kahului Elementary Code: 405 Status and Improvement Report Year 2014-15 Focus On Standards Grades K-5 Focus on Standards Description Contents Setting Student Profile Community Profile Improvement Summary
More informationREADY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE
READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE Michal Kurlaender University of California, Davis Policy Analysis for California Education March 16, 2012 This research
More informationBureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION A Framework for Continuous School Improvement Planning (Summer 2009) GETTING RESULTS Continuous School Improvement Plan Gen 6-2 Year Plan Required for Schools in School
More informationBellevue University Admission Application
Bellevue University Admission Application Bellevue University is an open admissions university. Once you submit your application, we will begin the process of evaluating your credits and developing your
More informationSamuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School
Code: 420 Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate Status and Improvement Report Year 2014-15 Focus On Standards Grades 6-8 Contents This Status and Improvement Report has been prepared as part of the Department's
More information12-month Enrollment
12-month Enrollment 2016-17 Institution: Potomac State College of West Virginia University (237701) Overview 12-month Enrollment Overview The 12-Month Enrollment component collects unduplicated student
More informationExecutive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY
Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY 40741-1222 Document Generated On January 13, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the School System 2 System's Purpose 4 Notable
More informationPort Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN
Port Jefferson Union Free School District Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN 2016-2017 Approved by the Board of Education on August 16, 2016 TABLE of CONTENTS
More informationRaw Data Files Instructions
Raw Data Files Instructions Colleges will report the above information for students in the Main Cohort for each of the reporting timeframes and the system will calculate the sub cohorts and metrics based
More informationEssentials of Ability Testing. Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology
Essentials of Ability Testing Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology Basic Topics Why do we administer ability tests? What do ability tests measure? How are
More informationSupply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel
Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel Presentation to the 82 nd Annual Virginia Middle and High School Principals Conference and Exposition Mrs. Patty S. Pitts Assistant Superintendent of
More informationInstitution of Higher Education Demographic Survey
Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey Data from all participating institutions are aggregated for the comparative studies by various types of institutional characteristics. For that purpose,
More informationData Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)
Institutional Research and Assessment Data Glossary This document is a collection of terms and variable definitions commonly used in the universities reports. The definitions were compiled from various
More informationBest Colleges Main Survey
Best Colleges Main Survey Date submitted 5/12/216 18::56 Introduction page 1 / 146 BEST COLLEGES Data Collection U.S. News has begun collecting data for the 217 edition of Best Colleges. The U.S. News
More informationNATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS Palm Desert, CA The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is the nation s core postsecondary education data collection program. It is a single,
More informationManasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results
Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments Spring 2012 Results Assessments Administered 2012 ACCESS for ELL S- State mandated for English Language Learners. NJPASS- for Grade 2 School Optional.
More informationUpdated: December Educational Attainment
Updated: Educational Attainment Among 25- to 29-year olds, the proportions who have attained a high school education, some college, or a bachelor s degree are all rising, according to longterm trends.
More informationUniversity of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes
University of Utah FRESHMAN-COHORT GRADUATION RATES All Students Student-Athletes # 2009-10 Graduation Rate 64% 64% Four-Class Average 61% 64% Student-Athlete Graduation Success Rate 87% 1. Graduation-Rates
More informationCONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education
CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION Connecticut State Department of Education October 2017 Preface Connecticut s educators are committed to ensuring that students develop the skills and acquire
More informationEFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS
EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS Jennifer Head, Ed.S Math and Least Restrictive Environment Instructional Coach Department
More informationPractices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois
Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois Summary of the Practice. Step Up to High School is a four-week transitional summer program for incoming ninth-graders in Chicago Public Schools.
More informationSection V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient
Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient Understanding Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient Decision Guide: Reclassifying a Student from
More informationGetting Results Continuous Improvement Plan
Page of 9 9/9/0 Department of Education Market Street Harrisburg, PA 76-0 Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan 0-0 Principal Name: Ms. Sharon Williams School Name: AGORA CYBER CS District Name:
More informationMoving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report
Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness Austin ISD Progress Report 2013 A Letter to the Community Central Texas Job Openings More than 150 people move to the Austin
More informationPathways to College Preparatory Advanced Academic Offerings in the Anchorage School District
Pathways to College Preparatory Advanced Academic Offerings in the Anchorage School District Prepared by: Rosyland Frazier Diane Hirshberg Prepared for: CITC s Anchorage Realizing Indigenous Student Excellence
More informationTRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior
: Sophomore Junior Senior 2714 W Augusta Phone: 773.534.9718 Fax: 773.534.4022 Email: admissions@chiarts.org Web: www.chiarts.org CPS Mail Run: G.S.R. #35 FRESHMAN APPLICATION STEPS Thank you for your
More informationRAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI
RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI Agenda Introductions Definitions History of the work Strategies Next steps Debrief
More informationBasic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)
Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal 2016-2017 Date Submitted: March 14, 2016 Check One: New Proposal: Continuing Project: X Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing) Control # 87-413 - EOPS
More informationBellehaven Elementary
Overall istrict: Albuquerque Public Schools Grade Range: KN-05 Code: 1229 School Grade Report Card 2013 Current Standing How did students perform in the most recent school year? are tested on how well
More information5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity
5 Programmatic Equity It is one thing to take as a given that approximately 70 percent of an entering high school freshman class will not attend college, but to assign a particular child to a curriculum
More informationEl Toro Elementary School
El Toro Elementary School 2013-14 Published During 2014-15 El Toro Elementary Contact Information (School Year 2014-15) 455 East Main Ave. Morgan Hill, CA 95037-3745 (408) 201-6380 Principal: Contact E-mail
More informationAfrican American Male Achievement Update
Report from the Department of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment Number 8 January 16, 2009 African American Male Achievement Update AUTHOR: Hope E. White, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist Department
More informationUW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!
UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program College Bound 2017 Take Charge of Your Future! This is a great program to increase your knowledge on various subjects. Students will be engaged in workshops and hands-on
More informationFinancing Education In Minnesota
Financing Education In Minnesota 2016-2017 Created with Tagul.com A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department August 2016 Financing Education in Minnesota 2016-17
More informationADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools
ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools The district requests an additional year to implement the previously approved turnaround option. Evidence
More informationMissouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development
Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development Missouri 4-H Key Award Purpose To Encourage: A quality educational programs for all members. A safe environment where all youth feel
More informationTotal amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:
Total amount of PPG expected for the year 2015-16 138,960 Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School: Aims for all pupils to make at expected progress between
More information1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview Section 11.515, Florida Statutes, was created by the 1996 Florida Legislature for the purpose of conducting performance reviews of school districts in Florida. The statute
More informationMeeting the Challenges of No Child Left Behind in U.S. Immersion Education
The Bridge: From Research to Practice Meeting the Challenges of No Child Left Behind in U.S. Immersion Education Mike Anderson, Ph.D., Visiting Assistant Professor, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
More informationCalifornia State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science
Application must be completed in black or blue ink only. STUDENT INFORMATION Name: Social Security # - - First Middle Last Address: Apt.# Phone: ( ) City: State: Zip Code: Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
More information46 Children s Defense Fund
Nationally, about 1 in 15 teens ages 16 to 19 is a dropout. Fewer than two-thirds of 9 th graders in Florida, Georgia, Louisiana and Nevada graduate from high school within four years with a regular diploma.
More informationLike much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.
36 37 POPULATION TRENDS Economy ECONOMY Like much of the country, suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession. Since bottoming out in the first quarter of 2010, however, the city has seen
More informationOVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE
OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE Mark R. Shinn, Ph.D. Michelle M. Shinn, Ph.D. Formative Evaluation to Inform Teaching Summative Assessment: Culmination measure. Mastery
More informationInstructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.
Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process and Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CLD) Students Guidelines and Resources
More informationNational Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates
National Collegiate Retention and Persistence-to-Degree Rates Since 1983, ACT has collected a comprehensive database of first-to-second-year retention rates and persistence-to-degree rates. These rates
More informationK-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)
K-12 Academic Intervention Plan Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI) September 2016 June 2018 2016 2018 K 12 Academic Intervention Plan Table of Contents AIS Overview...Page
More informationTestimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education
Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education October 3, 2017 Chairman Alexander, Senator Murray, members of the
More informationBUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools
1 BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES Council of the Great City Schools 2 Overview This analysis explores national, state and district performance
More informationGovernors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Summary In today s competitive global economy, our education system must prepare every student to be successful
More informationTITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION
ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 25 TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : PERSONNEL Section 25.10 Accredited Institution PART 25 CERTIFICATION
More informationEvaluation of Teach For America:
EA15-536-2 Evaluation of Teach For America: 2014-2015 Department of Evaluation and Assessment Mike Miles Superintendent of Schools This page is intentionally left blank. ii Evaluation of Teach For America:
More informationNational Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary
National Survey of Student Engagement Spring 2010 University of Kansas Executive Summary Overview One thousand six hundred and twenty-one (1,621) students from the University of Kansas completed the web-based
More informationExecutive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence
Forrest City School District Mrs. Shirley Taylor, Principal 149 Water Street Forrest City, AR 72335 Document Generated On February 26, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the School 2
More informationExecutive Summary. Hamilton High School
Executive Summary Hamilton High School Hamilton School District Dr. Kathleen Cooke, Superintendent W220 N6151 Town Line Rd. Sussex, WI 53089 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Executive Summary 2 Description
More informationRural Education in Oregon
Rural Education in Oregon Overcoming the Challenges of Income and Distance ECONorthwest )'3231-'7 *-2%2') 40%22-2+ Cover photos courtesy of users Lars Plougmann, San José Library, Jared and Corin, U.S.Department
More informationMinnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) To be submitted to the U.S. Department of Education in September 2017 IMPORTANT NOTE: This is an early draft prepared for
More informationDenver Public Schools
2017 Candidate Surveys Denver Public Schools Denver School Board District 4: Northeast DPS District 4 - Introduction School board elections offer community members the opportunity to reflect on the state
More informationGeorge A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During
George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2015-16 School Year Published During 2016-17 By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required
More informationFacts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning
Facts and Figures 2008-2009 Office of Institutional Research and Planning Office of Institutional Research Fall 2009 Facts at a Glance Credit Headcount Enrollments Headcount Ethnicity Headcount Percent
More informationArlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5
GOAL 1: Professional Development Arlington Elementary School will implement an effective, cohesive and sustainable professional development model that maximizes the conditions of learning for all students.
More informationCONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS
CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS No. 18 (replaces IB 2008-21) April 2012 In 2008, the State Education Department (SED) issued a guidance document to the field regarding the
More informationRace, Class, and the Selective College Experience
Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience Thomas J. Espenshade Alexandria Walton Radford Chang Young Chung Office of Population Research Princeton University December 15, 2009 1 Overview of NSCE
More informationDUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.
DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION SM You can get anywhere from here. Please print or type: DUAL ENROLLMENT APPLICATION Last Name First Name Maiden/Middle Social Security # Local Address (include apt.
More informationThe Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement
The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement Eva L. Baker, EdD - University of California, Los Angeles, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing
More informationGeorgia Department of Education
Georgia Department of Education Early Intervention Program (EIP) Guidance 2014-2015 School Year The Rubrics are required for school districts to use along with other supporting documents in making placement
More information