Cooper Upper Elementary School
|
|
- Elfreda Wiggins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION Mark Johnson, President Colleen Burton, Vice President Dianne Laura, Secretary Tammy Bonifield, Trustee Dan Centers, Trustee Eileen McDonnell, Trustee Randy Roulier, Trustee Dr. Randy Liepa, Superintendent Terry E. Taylor, Principal Marjorie Moore, Principal 2855 Ann Arbor Trail Westland, MI
2 15125 Farmington Road Livonia MI Phone (734) August 19, 214 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER) which provides key information on the educational progress for. The AER addresses the complex reporting information required by federal and state laws. The school s report contains information about student assessment, accountability and teacher quality. If you have any questions about the AER, please contact me, Terry Taylor, Principal of, for assistance. The AER is available for you to review electronically by visiting the following web site or you may review a copy in the main office of our school. The AER has two major sections to it that are required by state law. The information contained in the first section was compiled by district staff. It presents relevant information about our district, our academic programs, school improvement efforts, two years of results on district developed assessments and nationally norm referenced assessments. It also includes the district s parent involvement policy and specialized programs. The second section of the report contains information provided by the Michigan Department of Education. The state has identified some schools with the status of Reward, Focus or Priority. A Reward school is one that is outperforming other schools in achievement, growth, or is performing better than other schools with a similar student population. A Focus school is one that has a large achievement gap in 3% of its student achievement scores. A Priority school is one whose achievement and growth is in the lowest 5% of all schools in the state. has not been given one of these labels. Our school has identified underperforming subgroups of students, including economically disadvantaged students and students with disabilities, for whom additional intervention and support is needed in order to increase their proficiency and to close the achievement gap in the targeted areas. In order to accelerate student achievement, Cooper Upper Elementary has put in place is a multi-tiered system of support that provides supplemental instruction to our most at risk students through our Title I literacy and math support groups. In addition, we will be addressing the achievement gap for our economically disadvantaged students by providing ongoing professional development on teaching students of poverty. Finally, continuous analysis of formative assessments to determine the needs of all students, followed by the provision of targeted learning intervention to students in need is being undertaken to close persistent gaps in achievement. These initiatives are intended to accelerate the student achievement of subgroups, including the state s new Bottom 3%, that are not meeting our school s proficiency targets. Our collaborative efforts positively impact our school s success and student achievement. Sincerely, Terry Taylor, Principal 2
3 The Livonia Public Schools School District prohibits unlawful discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, height, weight, marital status, handicap or disability in any of its educational programs or activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquires regarding the nondiscrimination policies: Director of Human Resources, Farmington Road, Livonia, MI (734) MISSION STATEMENT We are a leadership school. The mission at is to develop leaders. We work collaboratively to create multiple opportunities for students to become caring, trustworthy, respectful, responsible lifelong learners. We envision our school to be a place where students, staff, and Cooper families embrace leadership and learning. VISION We envision our school to be a place where students, staff, and Cooper families embrace and adhere to the leadership attitudes we call the Cooper Core Four: Be Responsible Be Caring Be Respectful Be Trustworthy Our school motto is Learning and Leading SCHOOL PROFILE serves 73 students in grades 5 and 6. The principal at Cooper Upper Elementary School is Mr. Terry Taylor, the assistant principal is Ms. Sarah Aherne, and there are 36 professional teaching staff members and one media specialist. In addition, there are the following professional support staff members: a school psychologist, a school social worker, one learning specialist, one Elementary Student Assistance Provider (E.S.A.P.), a speech and language therapist, as well as homebound or hospitalized services. State law requires that we report the following additional information. ASSIGNING PUPILS TO THE SCHOOL All students are assigned to based upon residence within the geographic boundaries of the school, as well as students who transfer to Cooper based on space availability. 3
4 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT School improvement is a process in which stakeholders in a school work cooperatively to improve student achievement. The process relies on parents, staff, and students participating in collaborative decision making. The goals are determined through analysis of student achievement data and survey information. Action plans using proven interventions are developed for each improvement goal and progress toward achievement of the goals is documented annually. Our staff established the following three goals for and we retained these goals for : 1. All Cooper students will be proficient in basic math computation with precision and fluency. 2. All Cooper students will be proficient in informational reading. 3. All Cooper students will be proficient in writing. The Livonia Public Schools School District has had its District Level accreditation through AdvanceEd. Through the district accreditation process, also received AdvancED accreditation. The AdvancED accreditation process supports and validates district and school level improvement efforts. SPECIALIZED SCHOOLS OR PROGRAMS At the elementary level, students may be enrolled in Alternative Classrooms for the Academically Talented (ACAT) at Webster Elementary School and special education centers at Buchanan, Cass, Coolidge, Riley, Cooper and Johnson. Preschool special education programs are located at Perrinville Early Childhood Center. Other special education programs are available in western Wayne County for our students with disabilities, based upon their individual needs. A preschool is operated at the Jackson Center. Specific information about these programs is available on the district Web site at CORE CURRICULUM The core curriculum at Cooper Upper Elementary provides learning experiences in reading, writing, speaking, listening, spelling, handwriting, mathematics, social studies, science, technology, health, physical education, art, instrumental music, vocal music, library/research skills and enrichment activities. The core curriculum is based on the grade level content expectations (GLCEs) from the Michigan Department of Education and the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics and English Language Arts. The goal of education is to provide all learners with a solid foundation of skills, knowledge, and understandings that are necessary for their continual growth and success as students within the school setting and as adults in society. As a result of sound K-12 education based on well defined educational outcomes, a Livonia Public School graduate will: Respect self, others, and the environment. Communicate effectively. Know how to learn and work productively. Acquire and process information. Use critical and creative thinking to make decisions and solve problems. Work and participate independently and cooperatively. Acquire a core of understanding and competencies within the content areas. 4
5 A copy of the core curriculum may be obtained from the district s Academic Services Department. STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT ON DISTRICT DEVELOPED AND NATIONAL ASSESSMENTS DISTRICT LITERACY ASSESSMENTS in grades 5-6 are assessed using the Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System. Teachers administer running records with comprehension to students one-on-one a minimum of two times each year. The following table shows the percent of students at each grade level that performed at or above grade level on this assessment. FOUNTAS AND PINNELL BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS GRADES 5-6 Percent of that Performed At or Above Grade Level Spring 214 Grade 5 Grade 6 Cooper 91% 84% District 91% 85% Spring 213 Grade 5 Grade 6 Cooper 81.8% 79.2% District 85.3% 78.8% DISTRICT MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS were assessed in mathematics knowledge twice during the school year. In September, students in grades K-5 were tested on Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSS) and reported using Grade Level Content Expectations (GLCEs) strands taught within the Everyday Mathematics program. Kindergarten students were assessed with a new Pre/Post assessment created by the district and students in grades 1-5 were assessed using a new Pre/Post Everyday Mathematics online assessment. In April, students in grades K-5 were assessed again on the same Grade Level Content Expectations (GLCEs) and Common Core State Standards for Mathematics using the same assessments that were administered in September. The following data show the percentage of students who were proficient at each grade level on the Pre/Post mathematics assessment. Numbers & Numeration MATHEMATICS ELEMENTARY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 5 Percent of Operations & Computations Measurement Reference Frames Patterns, Functions, Algebra Data & Chance Geometry Totals* Pre-Test Cooper 11% 15% 16% 13% 13% 39% 9% District 17% 21% 22% 16% 18% 42% 14% Post-Test Cooper % 44% 59% 34% 33% 58% 38% District 5% 58% 69% 38% 42% 64% 52% *Total score indicates proficiency in all 6 strands. 5
6 NORM REFERENCED ASSESSMENT The Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS) and the Cognitive Ability Test (CogAT) from Riverside Publishing are administered to sixth grade students. ITBS GRADE 6 Median Grade Equivalent Score Reading Mathematics All Male Female All Male Female Cooper District Cooper District CogAT GRADE 6 Age Percentiles Verbal Quantitative Nonverbal Composite Cooper District Cooper District PARENT TEACHER CONFERENCES One of the most important factors in success in school for a child is the involvement of the parent or guardian in the educational process. Parent-teacher conferences were attended by 89% (627 conferences held) of our parents during and 87% during Cooper Upper Elementary parental involvement also includes attendance at our Curriculum Nights, Art Fair, Vocal and Instrumental Music Concerts, Title I, and The Leader In Me events. Open House attendance was 81% during and 83% during PTA membership was 57% of Cooper families in this, our eighth year as an upper elementary school. 6
7 PARENT INVOLVEMENT No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires the annual dissemination of the district s policy on Parent Involvement. BOARD POLICY IDD(1) PARENT INVOLVEMENT JUNE 2, 211 The Board strongly encourages and welcomes the involvement of parent(s)/guardian(s) in all of the District s educational programs. It is recognized and appreciated that parents/guardians are the first teachers of their children, and that their interest and involvement in the education of their children should not diminish once their child enters the schools of the District. Accordingly, the Board directs, by the adoption of this policy, that the administration shall design a program/plan that will encourage parent(s)/guardian(s) participation that may include, but not be limited to: The development and review of instructional materials; input on the ways that the District may better provide parent(s)/guardian(s) with information concerning current laws, regulations, and instructional programs; and District offerings of training programs to instruct parent(s)/guardian(s) how to become more involved in their child s educational programs. Pursuant to state law, the Superintendent shall provide a copy of the District s Parental Involvement plan to all parents. Reference: 2 USCA 6316, 2 USCA 6318 (No Child Left Behind Act) The district s Parent Involvement Plan is available on the district s website, which is linked to each school s website. The following pages are provided by the Michigan Department of Education and fulfill federal NCLB reporting requirements. These pages cannot be amended, modified or adjusted. They must be included as provided by the state. The state assessment data does not include a description of the assessments. Livonia Public Schools has provided the following definitions to assist you in your understanding of the assessments. MEAP assesses mathematics and reading to all third-eighth grade students, writing to all fourth and seventh graders, science to all fifth and eighth graders, and social studies to all sixth and ninth graders. Only mathematics, ELA/reading and science scores are reported in the following pages. MI-Access is Michigan s alternate assessment system, designed for students with cognitive impairments whose IEP (Individualized Educational Program) Team has determined that MEAP assessments, even with accommodations, are not appropriate. Participation is for students with severe cognitive impairment, or those who function as if they have such impairment. Supported Independence is for students with moderate cognitive impairment, or those who function as if they have such impairment. Functional Independence is for students with mild cognitive impairment, or those who function as if they have such impairment. 7
8 8/7/214 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Mathematics 5th Grade All % 65.6% 58.2% 6.5% 51.7% 11.8% 3% Mathematics 5th Grade All % 61.8% 51.5% 5.5% 46% 16.2% 32.3% Mathematics 5th Grade American Indian % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade African American % 33.3% 46.7% 6.7% 4% % 53.3% Mathematics 5th Grade African American % 22.2% 15% % 15% 2% 65% Mathematics 5th Grade Asian % 9.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade Asian % 79.1% 5% 1% 4% 2% 3% Mathematics 5th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Mathematics 5th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Mathematics 5th Grade Two or More Races Mathematics 5th Grade Two or More Races % 56.5% 64.7% % 64.7% 29.4% 5.9% % 44.4% 52.2% 4.3% 47.8% 21.7% 26.1% % 6% 66.7% % 66.7% 8.3% 25% % 51.4% 46.7% 6.7% 4% 26.7% 26.7% Mathematics 5th Grade White % 68.5% 57.6% 7.4% 5.2% 11.2% 31.2% Mathematics 5th Grade White % 65.9% 54.6% 5.8% 48.8% 14.6% 3.8% Mathematics 5th Grade Female % 67.7% 58.9% 5.7% 53.2% 1.8% 3.4% Mathematics 5th Grade Female % 57.7% 45.9% 4.7% 41.2% 19.4% 34.7% Mathematics 5th Grade Male % 63.4% 57.6% 7.3% 5.3% 12.7% 29.7% Mathematics 5th Grade Male % 65.5% 57.6% 6.3% 51.3% 12.7% 29.7% Mathematics 5th Grade Economically % 46.2% 41% 1.7% 39.3% 12.8% 46.2% Page 1 of
9 8/7/214 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Mathematics 5th Grade Economically Mathematics 5th Grade English Language Learners Mathematics 5th Grade English Language Learners Mathematics 5th Grade With Disabilities Mathematics 5th Grade With Disabilities % 42.8%.7% 3.8% 33.8% 22.3% 4% % 58.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 38.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 26.7% 2% 2.2% 17.8% 11.1% 68.9% % 24.4% 17.2% % 17.2% 17.2% 65.5% Mathematics 6th Grade All % 62.3% 5.3% 7% 43.3% 17.7% 32% Mathematics 6th Grade All % 59.7% 51.8% 9.5% 42.3% 19.2% 29% Mathematics 6th Grade American Indian % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade African American % 27.4% 2.8% % 2.8% 25% 54.2% Mathematics 6th Grade African American % 2.7% 3% 5% 25% 2% 5% Mathematics 6th Grade Asian % 98% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade Asian % 68.3% 4% 2% 2% % 6% Mathematics 6th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Mathematics 6th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Mathematics 6th Grade Two or More Races % 6% 61.1% % 61.1% 16.7% 22.2% % 52% 58.8% 5.9% 52.9% 11.8% 29.4% % 6% 47.8% 21.7% 26.1% 17.4% 34.8% Page 2 of
10 8/7/214 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Mathematics 6th Grade Two or More Races % 65.1% 61.5% 23.1% 38.5% 15.4% 23.1% Mathematics 6th Grade White % 63.9% 51.6% 6.2% 45.5% 17.5% 3.9% Mathematics 6th Grade White % 63.7% 52.7% 9% 43.7% 2.6% 26.7% Mathematics 6th Grade Female % 65% 54% 8.1% 46% 18% 28% Mathematics 6th Grade Female % 62.5% 51.5% 1.3% 41.2% 18.8% 29.7% Mathematics 6th Grade Male % 59.9% 47% 6% 41% 17.5% 35.5% Mathematics 6th Grade Male % 56.7% 52% 8.7% 43.4% 19.7% 28.3% Mathematics 6th Grade Economically Mathematics 6th Grade Economically Mathematics 6th Grade English Language Learners Mathematics 6th Grade English Language Learners Mathematics 6th Grade With Disabilities Mathematics 6th Grade With Disabilities % 39.4% 31.8% 3.1% 28.7% 23.3% 45% %.9%.9% 3.8% 34.1% 2.5% 41.7% % 5% <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 15.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 2.7% 13.5% % 13.5% 13.5% 73% % 22% 21.4% 4.8% 16.7% 19% 59.5% Reading 5th Grade All % 78.1% 75.2% 11.7% 63.5% 15.6% 9.2% Reading 5th Grade All % 8.3% 78.5% 19.7% 58.8% 12.3% 9.2% Reading 5th Grade American Indian % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Page 3 of
11 8/7/214 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Reading 5th Grade African American % 48.8% 6% % 6% 13.3% 26.7% Reading 5th Grade African American % 55.7% 55% 5% 5% 25% 2% Reading 5th Grade Asian % 84.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade Asian % 83.7% 9% 1% 8% % 1% Reading 5th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Reading 5th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Reading 5th Grade Two or More Races Reading 5th Grade Two or More Races % 79.5% 81.3% 18.8% 62.5% 18.8% % % 71.1% 78.3% 26.1% 52.2% 17.4% 4.3% % 84.2% 9.9% 9.1% 81.8% 9.1% % % 75.7% 8% 26.7% 53.3% 2% % Reading 5th Grade White % 8.5% 75.7% 11.8% 63.9% 16% 8.4% Reading 5th Grade White % 82.9% 79.8% 2.2% 59.5% 1.9% 9.3% Reading 5th Grade Female % 83.2% 8.5% 14.3% 66.2% 14.9% 4.5% Reading 5th Grade Female % 81.7% 77.9% 22.1% 55.8% 14% 8.1% Reading 5th Grade Male % 72.8% 7.2% 9.3% 6.9% 16.1% 13.7% Reading 5th Grade Male % 79% 79.1% 17% 62.1% 1.5% 1.5% Reading 5th Grade Economically Reading 5th Grade Economically % 62.3% 63.4% 5.4% 58% 19.6% 17% % 72.8% 74.2% 14.8% 59.4% 14.1% 11.7% Page 4 of
12 8/7/214 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Reading 5th Grade English Language Learners Reading 5th Grade English Language Learners Reading 5th Grade With Disabilities Reading 5th Grade With Disabilities % 43.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 47.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 41.3% 51.4% 2.7% 48.6% 18.9% 29.7% % 45.7% 46.2% 3.8% 42.3% 19.2% 34.6% Reading 6th Grade All % 77.4% 72.7% 22.9% 49.9% 14.4% 12.9% Reading 6th Grade All % 79.6% 71.9% 2.2% 51.7% 19% 9.1% Reading 6th Grade American Indian % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade African American % 56.5% 53.8% 11.5% 42.3% 11.5% 34.6% Reading 6th Grade African American % 54.1% 5% 1% 4% 35% 15% Reading 6th Grade Asian % 96% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade Asian % 84.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Reading 6th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Reading 6th Grade Two or More Races Reading 6th Grade Two or More Races % 68% 55.6% 16.7% 38.9% 33.3% 11.1% % 79.6% 75% 12.5% 62.5% 25% % % 72.7% 65.2% 3.4% 34.8% 21.7% 13% % 79.1% 75% 25% 5% 8.3% 16.7% Page 5 of
13 8/7/214 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Reading 6th Grade White % 79.4% 76.3% 23.3% 53% 12.6% 11.1% Reading 6th Grade White % 82.1% 73.6% 22% 51.6% 17.9% 8.4% Reading 6th Grade Female % 84% 81.5% 31.5% 5% 13% 5.6% Reading 6th Grade Female % 83.3% 74.4% 22.5% 51.9% 17.5% 8.1% Reading 6th Grade Male % 71.5% 64.8% 15.1% 49.7% 15.6% 19.6% Reading 6th Grade Male % 75.6% 69.6% 18.1% 51.5% 2.5% 9.9% Reading 6th Grade Economically Reading 6th Grade Economically Reading 6th Grade English Language Learners Reading 6th Grade English Language Learners Reading 6th Grade With Disabilities Reading 6th Grade With Disabilities % 63.4% 61.4% 15% 46.5% 16.5% 22% % 64.8% 61.2% 1.9% 5.4% 26.4% 12.4% % 53.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 25% <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 32.1% 21.2% 3% 18.2% 24.2% 54.5% % 33% 4% 14.3% 25.7% 25.7% 34.3% Science 5th Grade All % 16.4% 9.9% 1.2% 8.7% 33.3% 56.8% Science 5th Grade All % 23.8% 17.9% 4.1% 13.8% 36.7% 45.5% Science 5th Grade American Indian % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Science 5th Grade African American % 4.9% 5.9% % 5.9% 23.5% 7.6% Page 6 of
14 8/7/214 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Science 5th Grade African American % 5.3% % % % 18.2% 81.8% Science 5th Grade Asian % 35.6% 1% % 1% 2% 7% Science 5th Grade Asian %.2% 2% % 2% 3% 5% Science 5th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Science 5th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Science 5th Grade Two or More Races Science 5th Grade Two or More Races % 15.2% 11.8% % 11.8% 35.3% 52.9% % 12.8% 21.7% % 21.7% 39.1% 39.1% % 15% 18.2% % 18.2% 27.3% 54.5% % 3.8%.5% 6.3% 31.3% 25%.5% Science 5th Grade White % 16.7% 9.7% 1.4% 8.3% 34.7% 55.6% Science 5th Grade White % 25% 17.8% 4.8% 13% 38.9% 43.3% Science 5th Grade Female % 15.2% 6.1% % 6.1% 35.6% 58.3% Science 5th Grade Female % 21% 16.7% 4.4% 12.2% 35% 48.3% Science 5th Grade Male % 17.6% 13.5% 2.4% 11.2% 31.2% 55.3% Science 5th Grade Male % 26.3% 19.3% 3.7% 15.5% 38.5% 42.2% Science 5th Grade Economically Science 5th Grade Economically Science 5th Grade English Language Learners % 5.7% 1.6% % 1.6% 24.4% 74% % 1.1% 7.2% 1.4% 5.8% 38.1% 54.7% % % % % % % 1% Page 7 of
15 8/7/214 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Science 5th Grade English Language Learners Science 5th Grade With Disabilities Science 5th Grade With Disabilities % 3.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 4.1% 5.4% % 5.4% 17.9% 76.8% % 9.6% 4.8% % 4.8% 16.7% 78.6% Page 8 of
16 8/7/214 Michigan Merit Examination (MME) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) No Data to Display Page 9 of
17 8/7/214 Michigan Educational Assessment Program Access (MEAP - Access) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Exceeded % Met % Progressing Mathematics 5th Grade All % 75% 7% 2% 5% 3% Mathematics 5th Grade All % 58.8% 76.9% 23.1% 53.8% 23.1% Mathematics 5th Grade African American % 75% <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade African American % 75% <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade Asian % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade Two or More Races % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade White % 78.6% 71.4% 28.6% 42.9% 28.6% Mathematics 5th Grade White % 61.5% 8% 2% 6% 2% Mathematics 5th Grade Female % 5% 6% 2% 4% 4% Mathematics 5th Grade Female % 65% 8% 2% 6% 2% Mathematics 5th Grade Male % 85.7% 8% 2% 6% 2% Mathematics 5th Grade Male % 5% 66.7% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% Mathematics 5th Grade Economically Mathematics 5th Grade Economically Mathematics 5th Grade English Language Learners % 75% 8% 4% 4% 2% % 55.6% 77.8% 22.2% 55.6% 22.2% % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade All % 6% 55.6% % 55.6% 44.4% Mathematics 6th Grade All % 68.8% 66.7% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% Mathematics 6th Grade African American % 66.7% <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade African American % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Page 1 of
18 8/7/214 Michigan Educational Assessment Program Access (MEAP - Access) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Exceeded % Met % Progressing Mathematics 6th Grade White % 62.5% 57.1% % 57.1% 42.9% Mathematics 6th Grade White % 78.6% 75%.5%.5% 25% Mathematics 6th Grade Female % 33.3% 33.3% % 33.3% 66.7% Mathematics 6th Grade Female % 1% <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade Male % 77.8% 66.7% % 66.7% 33.3% Mathematics 6th Grade Male % 61.5% 57.1% 28.6% 28.6% 42.9% Mathematics 6th Grade Economically Mathematics 6th Grade Economically % 7% 57.1% % 57.1% 42.9% % 5% 4% 2% 2% 6% Reading 5th Grade All % 81.5% 81.3%.5% 43.8% 18.8% Reading 5th Grade All % 69.7% 87.5% 5%.5% 12.5% Reading 5th Grade African American % 33.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade African American % 66.7% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade Asian % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Reading 5th Grade Two or More Races Reading 5th Grade Two or More Races % <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 1% <1 <1 <1 < % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade White % 89.5% 9.9% 45.5% 45.5% 9.1% Reading 5th Grade White % 7.4% 92.3% 53.8% 38.5% 7.7% Page 11 of
19 8/7/214 Michigan Educational Assessment Program Access (MEAP - Access) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Exceeded % Met % Progressing Reading 5th Grade Female % 1% 1% 5% 5% % Reading 5th Grade Female % 88.2% 1% 5% 5% % Reading 5th Grade Male % 73.7% 62.5% 25%.5%.5% Reading 5th Grade Male % 5% 75% 5% 25% 25% Reading 5th Grade Economically Reading 5th Grade Economically Reading 5th Grade English Language Learners % 66.7% 62.5% 25%.5%.5% % 72.2% 9.9% 36.4% 54.5% 9.1% % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade All % 6% 9% 1% 8% 1% Reading 6th Grade All % 59.1% 64.3% 14.3% 5% 35.7% Reading 6th Grade African American % 6% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade African American % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade Asian % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade Hispanic of Any Race % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade White % 69.2% 88.9% 11.1% 77.8% 11.1% Reading 6th Grade White % 64.7% 72.7% 18.2% 54.5% 27.3% Reading 6th Grade Female % 33.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade Female % 87.5% 83.3% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7% Reading 6th Grade Male % 71.4% 1% 12.5% 87.5% % Reading 6th Grade Male % 42.9% 5% 12.5%.5% 5% Page 12 of
20 8/7/214 Michigan Educational Assessment Program Access (MEAP - Access) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Exceeded % Met % Progressing Reading 6th Grade Economically Reading 6th Grade Economically Reading 6th Grade English Language Learners % 81.8% 1% 14.3% 85.7% % % 5% 57.1% 28.6% 28.6% 42.9% % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Page 13 of
21 8/7/214 MI-Access Functional Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Surpassed (Level 1) % Attained (Level 2) % Emerging (Level 3) Mathematics 5th Grade All % 58.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade All % 73.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade All % 47.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade All % 76.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 Science 5th Grade All % 29.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 Science 5th Grade All % 41.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade African American % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade African American % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Science 5th Grade African American % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade White % 6% <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade White % 76.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade White % 5% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade White % 78.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 Science 5th Grade White % 2% <1 <1 <1 <1 Science 5th Grade White % 5% <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Science 5th Grade Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Science 5th Grade Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Page 14 of
22 8/7/214 MI-Access Functional Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Surpassed (Level 1) % Attained (Level 2) % Emerging (Level 3) Mathematics 5th Grade Male % 61.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade Male % 63.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade Male % 38.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 5th Grade Male % 76.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 Science 5th Grade Male % 23.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 Science 5th Grade Male % 46.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade Economically Mathematics 5th Grade Economically Reading 5th Grade Economically Reading 5th Grade Economically Science 5th Grade Economically Science 5th Grade Economically Mathematics 5th Grade English Language Learners Reading 5th Grade English Language Learners Science 5th Grade English Language Learners % <1 <1 <1 <1 < % <1 <1 <1 <1 < % <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 63.6% <1 <1 <1 < % <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 27.3% <1 <1 <1 < % <1 <1 <1 <1 < % <1 <1 <1 <1 < % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade All % 83.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 Page 15 of
23 8/7/214 MI-Access Functional Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Surpassed (Level 1) % Attained (Level 2) % Emerging (Level 3) Mathematics 6th Grade All % 77.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade All % 94.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade All % 83.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade African American % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade African American % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade African American % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade African American % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade White % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade White % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade White % 9.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade White % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade Female % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade Male % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade Male % 78.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade Male % 9.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 6th Grade Male % 85.7% <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 6th Grade Economically % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Page 16 of
24 8/7/214 MI-Access Functional Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Surpassed (Level 1) % Attained (Level 2) % Emerging (Level 3) Mathematics 6th Grade Economically Reading 6th Grade Economically Reading 6th Grade Economically % <1 <1 <1 <1 < % 91.7% <1 <1 <1 < % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Page 17 of
25 8/7/214 MI-Access Supported Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Surpassed (Level 1) % Attained (Level 2) % Emerging (Level 3) Mathematics 5th Grade All % 9.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 ELA 5th Grade All % 1% <1 <1 <1 <1 Science 5th Grade All % 81.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade White % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ELA 5th Grade White % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Science 5th Grade White % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade Male % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ELA 5th Grade Male % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Science 5th Grade Male % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mathematics 5th Grade Economically ELA 5th Grade Economically Science 5th Grade Economically % <1 <1 <1 <1 < % <1 <1 <1 <1 < % <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Page 18 of
26 8/7/214 MI-Access Participation Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State % District % School % % Surpassed (Level 1) % Attained (Level 2) % Emerging (Level 3) No Data to Display Page 19 of
27 8/7/214 Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Location Subject % Tested Total(Goal 95%) % for Accountability* All Statewide Mathematics 99% 62.2% Bottom 3% Statewide Mathematics % 18.9% American Indian Statewide Mathematics 98.9% 54.1% African American Statewide Mathematics 97.5% 39.5% Asian Statewide Mathematics 99.6% 82.8% Hispanic of Any Race Statewide Mathematics 99.1% 51.5% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Statewide Mathematics 99% 67.9% Two or More Races Statewide Mathematics 99.3% 6.4% White Statewide Mathematics 99.3% 67.9% Economically Statewide Mathematics 98.6% 49.7% English Language Learners Statewide Mathematics 99.2% 46% With Disabilities Statewide Mathematics 98.1% 39.7% All District Mathematics 99.6% 73.4% Bottom 3% District Mathematics % 19.6% American Indian District Mathematics <3 <3 African American District Mathematics 99.5% 46.1% Asian District Mathematics 1% 91% Hispanic of Any Race District Mathematics 99.7% 66.8% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander District Mathematics <3 <3 Two or More Races District Mathematics 99.3% 72.9% White District Mathematics 99.6% 75.5% Economically District Mathematics 99.4% 6.6% English Language Learners District Mathematics 99.4% 63.4% With Disabilities District Mathematics 98.9% 45.9% All School Mathematics 1% 67.4% Bottom 3% School Mathematics % 11.4% American Indian School Mathematics <3 <3 African American School Mathematics 1% 45.7% Asian School Mathematics <3 <3 Hispanic of Any Race School Mathematics <3 <3 Page 2 of
28 8/7/214 Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Location Subject % Tested Total(Goal 95%) % for Accountability* Two or More Races School Mathematics 1% 7% White School Mathematics 1% 69.2% Economically School Mathematics 1% 57.7% English Language Learners School Mathematics <3 <3 With Disabilities School Mathematics 1% 38% All Statewide Reading 99.1% 85.8% Bottom 3% Statewide Reading % 6.1% American Indian Statewide Reading 99% 83.4% African American Statewide Reading 97.9% 72.2% Asian Statewide Reading 99.5% 91.9% Hispanic of Any Race Statewide Reading 99.2% 8.5% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Statewide Reading 98.8% 87.3% Two or More Races Statewide Reading 99.4% 86.3% White Statewide Reading 99.4% 89.3% Economically Statewide Reading 98.8% 78.5% English Language Learners Statewide Reading 99% 69.8% With Disabilities Statewide Reading 98.4% 56.2% All District Reading 99.6% 89.3% Bottom 3% District Reading % 67.4% American Indian District Reading <3 <3 African American District Reading 99.7% 71.1% Asian District Reading 1% 95.2% Hispanic of Any Race District Reading 99.7% 87.7% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander District Reading <3 <3 Two or More Races District Reading 99.3% 87.5% White District Reading 99.6% 9.8% Economically District Reading 99.5% 81% English Language Learners District Reading 99.4% 7.4% With Disabilities District Reading 99% 59.7% All School Reading 1% 83.6% Page 21 of
29 8/7/214 Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Location Subject % Tested Total(Goal 95%) % for Accountability* Bottom 3% School Reading % 49.3% American Indian School Reading <3 <3 African American School Reading 1% 6.9% Asian School Reading <3 <3 Hispanic of Any Race School Reading <3 <3 Two or More Races School Reading 1% 8% White School Reading 1% 85.2% Economically School Reading 1% 74.2% English Language Learners School Reading <3 <3 With Disabilities School Reading 1% 48.9% All Statewide Science 98.3% 42.9% Bottom 3% Statewide Science % 1.5% American Indian Statewide Science 98.4% 35.6% African American Statewide Science 95.8% 14.9% Asian Statewide Science 99.4% 61.1% Hispanic of Any Race Statewide Science 98.5% 26.7% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Statewide Science 99.1% 48.4% Two or More Races Statewide Science 98.9% 4.6% White Statewide Science 98.9% 5.1% Economically Statewide Science 97.4% 26.4% English Language Learners Statewide Science 98.4% 11.2% With Disabilities Statewide Science 97.2% 16.1% All District Science 99.3% 55.7% Bottom 3% District Science %.9% American Indian District Science <3 <3 African American District Science 99.2% 24.8% Asian District Science 1% 73.5% Hispanic of Any Race District Science 99.3% 43.7% Two or More Races District Science 99.3% 6.8% White District Science 99.3% 57.8% Economically District Science 98.8% 39% Page 22 of
30 8/7/214 Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Location Subject % Tested Total(Goal 95%) % for Accountability* English Language Learners District Science 98.4% 26.7% With Disabilities District Science 98.5% 25.1% All School Science <3 <3 Bottom 3% School Science <3 <3 African American School Science <3 <3 Asian School Science Hispanic of Any Race School Science Two or More Races School Science White School Science <3 <3 Economically School Science <3 <3 English Language Learners School Science With Disabilities School Science <3 <3 All Statewide Social Studies 97.3% 57.3% Bottom 3% Statewide Social Studies % 9.1% American Indian Statewide Social Studies 97.7% 49.7% African American Statewide Social Studies 93.6% 28.4% Asian Statewide Social Studies 99.1% 74.4% Hispanic of Any Race Statewide Social Studies 97.5% 42.7% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Statewide Social Studies 98.9% 65.5% Two or More Races Statewide Social Studies 98.2% 53.8% White Statewide Social Studies 98.2% 64.5% Economically Statewide Social Studies 95.8% 4.4% English Language Learners Statewide Social Studies 97.5% 22.7% With Disabilities Statewide Social Studies 92.3% 21.7% All District Social Studies 99.1% 66.1% Bottom 3% District Social Studies % 8.5% American Indian District Social Studies <3 <3 African American District Social Studies 99% 36.9% Asian District Social Studies 1% 79.8% Hispanic of Any Race District Social Studies 98.5% 55% Page 23 of
31 8/7/214 Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Location Subject % Tested Total(Goal 95%) % for Accountability* Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander District Social Studies <3 <3 Two or More Races District Social Studies 99.3% 71.1% White District Social Studies 99.1% 68.3% Economically District Social Studies 98.1% 5.6% English Language Learners District Social Studies 98% 15.7% With Disabilities District Social Studies 98.1% 29.7% All School Social Studies 1% 49.8% Bottom 3% School Social Studies % % American Indian School Social Studies <3 <3 African American School Social Studies <3 <3 Asian School Social Studies <3 <3 Hispanic of Any Race School Social Studies <3 <3 Two or More Races School Social Studies <3 <3 White School Social Studies 1% 49.4% Economically School Social Studies 1% 39.3% English Language Learners School Social Studies <3 <3 With Disabilities School Social Studies 1% 26.1% All Statewide Writing 98.5% 73.2% Bottom 3% Statewide Writing % 26.5% American Indian Statewide Writing 98.5% 63.2% African American Statewide Writing 96.4% 54.4% Asian Statewide Writing 99% 86% Hispanic of Any Race Statewide Writing 98.8% 64.3% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Statewide Writing 99% 76.6% Two or More Races Statewide Writing 99.1% 72.8% White Statewide Writing 99% 77.8% Economically Statewide Writing 97.8% 61.3% English Language Learners Statewide Writing 98% 51.1% With Disabilities Statewide Writing 97.7% 35.2% All District Writing 99.3% 79.7% Page 24 of
32 8/7/214 Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Location Subject % Tested Total(Goal 95%) % for Accountability* Bottom 3% District Writing % 33.2% American Indian District Writing <3 <3 African American District Writing 99.2% 54.3% Asian District Writing 1% 96.8% Hispanic of Any Race District Writing 99.3% 74.2% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander District Writing <3 <3 Two or More Races District Writing 98.5% 79.7% White District Writing 99.3% 81.4% Economically District Writing 99.1% 67.6% English Language Learners District Writing 98.1% 6.4% With Disabilities District Writing 98% 38.7% All School Writing % 72% Bottom 3% School Writing % 8.9% American Indian School Writing <3 <3 African American School Writing <3 <3 Asian School Writing <3 <3 Hispanic of Any Race School Writing <3 <3 Two or More Races School Writing <3 <3 White School Writing % 74.8% Economically School Writing % 64.8% English Language Learners School Writing <3 <3 With Disabilities School Writing % 14.3% Page 25 of
33 8/7/214 Accountability Details Graduation Data Testing Group Location Accountability Scorecard Completion Rate (High Schools only) (Goal 8%) All Statewide 77% American Indian Statewide 64.1% African American Statewide 6.5% Asian Statewide 87.9% Hispanic of Any Race Statewide 67.3% Migrant Statewide 7.5% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Statewide 69.2% Two or More Races Statewide 73.9% White Statewide 82.1% Female Statewide 81.5% Male Statewide 72.7% Economically Statewide 63.9% English Language Learners Statewide 65.4% With Disabilities Statewide 53.6% Homeless Statewide 54.2% All District 9.1% African American District 78.3% Asian District 91.7% Hispanic of Any Race District 82.9% Two or More Races District 91.8% White District 91.4% Economically District 8.6% With Disabilities District 52.8% Bottom 3% District 92.8% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. Page 26 of
34 8/7/214 Accountability Details Attendance Data Testing Group Location Attendance Rate (Goal 9%) All Statewide 94.3% All District 96.3% All School 96% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. Page 27 of
35 8/7/214 Accountability Status District Data District Name Reading Status Reading Score Writing Status Writing Score Math Status Math Score Science Status Science Score Social Studies Status Social Studies Score Overall Status Overall Score No Data to Display Page 28 of
36 8/7/214 Accountability Status School Data District Name School Name Title 1 Status Reading Status Reading Score Writing Status Writing Score Math Status Math Score Science Status Science Score Social Studies Status Social Studies Score Overall Status Overall Score Livonia Public Schools School District Cooper Upper Elementary School Green 2 Green 2 Green 2 Green 2 Green 2 Yellow 38 Page 29 of
37 8/7/214 Teacher Quality - Qualification Other B.A. M.A. P.H.D. Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School Professional Qualifications are defined by the State and may include information such as the degrees of public school teachers (e.g., percentage of teachers with Bachelors Degrees or Masters Degrees) or the percentage of fully certified teachers Teacher Quality - Class School Aggregate High-Poverty Schools Low-Poverty Schools Percentage of Core Academic Subject Elementary and Secondary School Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers.%.%.% Teacher Quality - Provisional Certification Percent Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School with Emergency Certification % Page 3 of
38 8/7/214 NAEP Grade 4 Math Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All Male Female National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL Reporting Standards not met. Note: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 213 Mathematics Achievement. Page 31 of
39 8/7/214 NAEP Grade 8 Math Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All Male Female National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 213 Mathematics Achievement. Page 32 of
40 8/7/214 NAEP Grade 12 Math Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All Male Female National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 213 Mathematics Achievement. Page 33 of
41 8/7/214 NAEP Grade 4 Reading Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All Male Female National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 213 Reading Assessment. Page 34 of
42 8/7/214 NAEP Grade 8 Reading Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All Male Female National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 213 Reading Assessment. Page 35 of
43 8/7/214 NAEP Grade 12 Reading Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All Male Female National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 213 Reading Assessment. Page 36 of
Cooper Upper Elementary School
LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS http://cooper.livoniapublicschools.org 215-216 Annual Education Report BOARD OF EDUCATION 215-16 Colleen Burton, President Dianne Laura, Vice President Tammy Bonifield, Secretary
More informationShelters Elementary School
Shelters Elementary School August 2, 24 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER) which provides key information on the 23-24 educational progress for the Shelters
More informationComing in. Coming in. Coming in
212-213 Report Card for Glenville High School SCHOOL DISTRICT District results under review by the Ohio Department of Education based upon 211 findings by the Auditor of State. Achievement This grade combines
More informationIowa School District Profiles. Le Mars
Iowa School District Profiles Overview This profile describes enrollment trends, student performance, income levels, population, and other characteristics of the public school district. The report utilizes
More informationA Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education
A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education Note: Additional information regarding AYP Results from 2003 through 2007 including a listing of each individual
More informationAnnual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent
Annual Report to the Public Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent 1 Conway Board of Education Ms. Susan McNabb Mr. Bill Clements Mr. Chuck Shipp Mr. Carl Barger Dr. Adam Lamey Dr. Quentin Washispack Mr. Andre
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST, ILLINOIS and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. 2 7 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest, ILLINOIS 2 8 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year.
More informationStatus of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine
Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine The figures and tables below are based upon the latest publicly available data from AAMC, NSF, Department of Education and the US Census Bureau.
More informationStudent Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation
Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist and Bethany L. McCaffrey, Ph.D., Interim Director of Research and Evaluation Evaluation
More informationStudent Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools
Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools Introduction The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (ESE) calculates and reports mobility rates as part of its overall
More informationPresident Abraham Lincoln Elementary School
Code: 134 President Abraham Lincoln Elementary Status and Improvement Report Year -04 Focus On Standards Grades K-5 Focus on Standards Description Contents p. 1 p. 1 This Status and Improvement Report
More informationMiami-Dade County Public Schools
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND THEIR ACADEMIC PROGRESS: 2010-2011 Author: Aleksandr Shneyderman, Ed.D. January 2012 Research Services Office of Assessment, Research, and Data Analysis 1450 NE Second Avenue,
More informationKahului Elementary School
Kahului Elementary Code: 405 Status and Improvement Report Year 2014-15 Focus On Standards Grades K-5 Focus on Standards Description Contents Setting Student Profile Community Profile Improvement Summary
More informationPort Graham El/High. Report Card for
School: District: Kenai Peninsula Grades: K - 12 School Enrollment: 20 Title I School? No Title 1 Program: Accreditation: Report Card for 2008-2009 A Title 1 school receives federal money in support low-achieving
More informationJohn F. Kennedy Middle School
John F. Kennedy Middle School CUPERTINO UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT Steven Hamm, Principal hamm_steven@cusdk8.org School Address: 821 Bubb Rd. Cupertino, CA 95014-4938 (408) 253-1525 CDS Code: 43-69419-6046890
More informationHokulani Elementary School
Hokulani Elementary Code: 109 Status and Improvement Report Year -11 Contents Focus On Standards Grades K-5 This Status and Improvement Report has been prepared as part of the Department's education accountability
More informationKansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance
Kansas State Department of Education Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance Based on Elementary & Secondary Education Act, No Child Left Behind (P.L. 107-110) Revised May 2010 Revised May
More informationEducational Attainment
A Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile of Allen County, Indiana based on the 2010 Census and the American Community Survey Educational Attainment A Review of Census Data Related to the Educational Attainment
More informationNewburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan
Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic Academic Intervention Services Plan Revised September 2016 October 2015 Newburgh Enlarged City School District Elementary Academic Intervention Services
More informationManasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results
Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments Spring 2012 Results Assessments Administered 2012 ACCESS for ELL S- State mandated for English Language Learners. NJPASS- for Grade 2 School Optional.
More informationWisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Main takeaways from the 2015 NAEP 4 th grade reading exam: Wisconsin scores have been statistically flat
More informationPsychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability
August 2012 Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability Linking Measures of Academic Progress in Mathematics and Maryland School Assessment in Mathematics Huafang Zhao, Ph.D. This brief
More informationFile Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10
Success - Key Measures Graduation Rate: 4-, 5-, and 6-Year 9. First-time, full-time entering, degree-seeking, students enrolled in a minimum of 12 SCH their first fall semester who have graduated from
More informationSamuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School
Code: 420 Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate Status and Improvement Report Year 2014-15 Focus On Standards Grades 6-8 Contents This Status and Improvement Report has been prepared as part of the Department's
More informationAfrican American Male Achievement Update
Report from the Department of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment Number 8 January 16, 2009 African American Male Achievement Update AUTHOR: Hope E. White, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist Department
More informationState of New Jersey
OVERVIEW 1213 GRADE SPAN KG6 116946 GALLOWAY, NEW JERSEY 85 This school's academic performance is about average when compared to schools across the state. Additionally, its academic performance is very
More informationSunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2014-15 School Year Published During 2015-16 By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by
More informationDemographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups
Appendix F Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups Demographic Survey--Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Discussion Group Demographic Survey Faculty with Disabilities Discussion Group Demographic Survey
More informationPractices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois
Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois Summary of the Practice. Step Up to High School is a four-week transitional summer program for incoming ninth-graders in Chicago Public Schools.
More informationData Diskette & CD ROM
Data File Format Data Diskette & CD ROM Texas Assessment of Academic Skills Fall 2002 through Summer 2003 Exit Level Test Administrations Attention Macintosh Users To accommodate Macintosh systems a delimiter
More informationSupply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel
Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel Presentation to the 82 nd Annual Virginia Middle and High School Principals Conference and Exposition Mrs. Patty S. Pitts Assistant Superintendent of
More informationDATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P
TITLE III REQUIREMENTS STATE POLICY DEFINITIONS DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITY IDENTIFICATION OF LEP STUDENTS A district that receives funds under Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act shall comply with the
More information2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND
Report from the Office of Student Assessment 31 November 29, 2012 2012 ACT RESULTS AUTHOR: Douglas G. Wren, Ed.D., Assessment Specialist Department of Educational Leadership and Assessment OTHER CONTACT
More informationTRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior
: Sophomore Junior Senior 2714 W Augusta Phone: 773.534.9718 Fax: 773.534.4022 Email: admissions@chiarts.org Web: www.chiarts.org CPS Mail Run: G.S.R. #35 FRESHMAN APPLICATION STEPS Thank you for your
More informationEl Toro Elementary School
El Toro Elementary School 2013-14 Published During 2014-15 El Toro Elementary Contact Information (School Year 2014-15) 455 East Main Ave. Morgan Hill, CA 95037-3745 (408) 201-6380 Principal: Contact E-mail
More informationPort Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN
Port Jefferson Union Free School District Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN 2016-2017 Approved by the Board of Education on August 16, 2016 TABLE of CONTENTS
More informationThe Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016
The Condition of College and Career Readiness This report looks at the progress of the 16 ACT -tested graduating class relative to college and career readiness. This year s report shows that 64% of students
More informationK-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)
K-12 Academic Intervention Plan Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI) September 2016 June 2018 2016 2018 K 12 Academic Intervention Plan Table of Contents AIS Overview...Page
More informationExecutive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School
Flagler County School District Dr. TC Culver, Principal 5545 Belle Terre Pkwy Palm Coast, FL 32137-3847 Document Generated On February 6, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the School
More informationEFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS
EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS Jennifer Head, Ed.S Math and Least Restrictive Environment Instructional Coach Department
More informationOrleans Central Supervisory Union
Orleans Central Supervisory Union Vermont Superintendent: Ron Paquette Primary contact: Ron Paquette* 1,142 students, prek-12, rural District Description Orleans Central Supervisory Union (OCSU) is the
More informationArlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5
GOAL 1: Professional Development Arlington Elementary School will implement an effective, cohesive and sustainable professional development model that maximizes the conditions of learning for all students.
More informationSchool Performance Plan Middle Schools
SY 2012-2013 School Performance Plan Middle Schools 734 Middle ALternative Program @ Lombard, Principal Roger Shaw (Interim), Executive Director, Network Facilitator PLEASE REFER TO THE SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
More informationFrank Phillips College. Accountability Report
Frank Phillips College Accountability Report January 2016 Accountability System, January 2016 1 of 22 Participation - Key Measures Enrollment 1. Fall Headcount (Unduplicated) Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015
More informationhttps://secure.aacte.org/apps/peds/print_all_forms.php?view=report&prin...
1 of 35 4/25/2012 9:56 AM A» 2011 PEDS» Institutional Data inst id: 3510 Institutional Data A_1 Institutional Information This information will be used in all official references to your institution. Institution
More informationRural Education in Oregon
Rural Education in Oregon Overcoming the Challenges of Income and Distance ECONorthwest )'3231-'7 *-2%2') 40%22-2+ Cover photos courtesy of users Lars Plougmann, San José Library, Jared and Corin, U.S.Department
More informationRAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI
RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI Agenda Introductions Definitions History of the work Strategies Next steps Debrief
More information64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-
I. Current School Status: A. School Information: 1. School-Level Information: a. School: Trenton High School b. Principal's name: Cheri Langford c. School Advisory Council chair's name: Heather Rucker
More informationFinancing Education In Minnesota
Financing Education In Minnesota 2016-2017 Created with Tagul.com A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department August 2016 Financing Education in Minnesota 2016-17
More informationExecutive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY
Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY 40741-1222 Document Generated On January 13, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the School System 2 System's Purpose 4 Notable
More informationRhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan
2014-2016 Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information School Rhyne Elementary School Courier Number 360484 Street Address 1900 West Davidson Avenue Phone Number
More informationNew Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)
New Student Application Name High School Date Received (official use only) Thank you for your interest in Project SEARCH! By completing the attached application materials, you are taking the next step
More informationBasic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)
Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal 2016-2017 Date Submitted: March 14, 2016 Check One: New Proposal: Continuing Project: X Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing) Control # 87-413 - EOPS
More informationExecutive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence
Forrest City School District Mrs. Shirley Taylor, Principal 149 Water Street Forrest City, AR 72335 Document Generated On February 26, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the School 2
More informationDenver Public Schools
2017 Candidate Surveys Denver Public Schools Denver School Board District 4: Northeast DPS District 4 - Introduction School board elections offer community members the opportunity to reflect on the state
More informationBureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION A Framework for Continuous School Improvement Planning (Summer 2009) GETTING RESULTS Continuous School Improvement Plan Gen 6-2 Year Plan Required for Schools in School
More informationGetting Results Continuous Improvement Plan
Page of 9 9/9/0 Department of Education Market Street Harrisburg, PA 76-0 Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan 0-0 Principal Name: Ms. Sharon Williams School Name: AGORA CYBER CS District Name:
More informationData Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)
Institutional Research and Assessment Data Glossary This document is a collection of terms and variable definitions commonly used in the universities reports. The definitions were compiled from various
More informationREADY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE
READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE Michal Kurlaender University of California, Davis Policy Analysis for California Education March 16, 2012 This research
More informationUpdated: December Educational Attainment
Updated: Educational Attainment Among 25- to 29-year olds, the proportions who have attained a high school education, some college, or a bachelor s degree are all rising, according to longterm trends.
More informationSummary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education
Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education Prepared for the Alameda County Board of Education November 10, 2015 Alameda County Office of Education Charter
More informationMoving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report
Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness Austin ISD Progress Report 2013 A Letter to the Community Central Texas Job Openings More than 150 people move to the Austin
More informationCONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education
CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION Connecticut State Department of Education October 2017 Preface Connecticut s educators are committed to ensuring that students develop the skills and acquire
More informationAPPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HEALTH CAREERS OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM College Science Enrichment Program (CSEP) & Pre-Enrollment Support Program (PESP) Website: http://www.mu.edu/hcop INSTRUCTIONS: Please type or print
More informationGeorgia Department of Education
Georgia Department of Education Early Intervention Program (EIP) Guidance 2014-2015 School Year The Rubrics are required for school districts to use along with other supporting documents in making placement
More information2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS
3 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS Achievement and Accountability Office December 3 NAEP: The Gold Standard The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is administered in reading
More informationDyer-Kelly Elementary 1
San Juan Unified School Dyer-Kelly Elementary School 2008-2009 School Accountability Report Card Deborah Wegsteen, Principal School Address: 2236 Edison Ave. Sacramento, CA 95821-1607 916-566-2150 Dr.
More informationADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools
ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools The district requests an additional year to implement the previously approved turnaround option. Evidence
More informationClark Lane Middle School
152-51 STRATEGIC SCHOOL PROFILE 2010-11 Middle and Junior High School Edition Clark Lane Middle School Waterford School District MICHAEL LOVETERE, Principal LYNN M. LYNCH, Asst. Principal Telephone: (860)
More informationEssentials of Ability Testing. Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology
Essentials of Ability Testing Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology Basic Topics Why do we administer ability tests? What do ability tests measure? How are
More informationBellehaven Elementary
Overall istrict: Albuquerque Public Schools Grade Range: KN-05 Code: 1229 School Grade Report Card 2013 Current Standing How did students perform in the most recent school year? are tested on how well
More informationNC Education Oversight Committee Meeting
NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting November 7, 2017 Nathan Currie, Superintendent Bridget Phifer, NCCA Board Chair Agenda School Demographics Achievements & Improvements Critical Needs Q&A Mission
More informationCalifornia State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science
Application must be completed in black or blue ink only. STUDENT INFORMATION Name: Social Security # - - First Middle Last Address: Apt.# Phone: ( ) City: State: Zip Code: Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
More informationPathways to College Preparatory Advanced Academic Offerings in the Anchorage School District
Pathways to College Preparatory Advanced Academic Offerings in the Anchorage School District Prepared by: Rosyland Frazier Diane Hirshberg Prepared for: CITC s Anchorage Realizing Indigenous Student Excellence
More informationTestimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education
Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education October 3, 2017 Chairman Alexander, Senator Murray, members of the
More informationMeeting the Challenges of No Child Left Behind in U.S. Immersion Education
The Bridge: From Research to Practice Meeting the Challenges of No Child Left Behind in U.S. Immersion Education Mike Anderson, Ph.D., Visiting Assistant Professor, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
More informationASCD Recommendations for the Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind
ASCD Recommendations for the Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) represents 178,000 educators. Our membership is composed of teachers,
More informationThe Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement
The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement Eva L. Baker, EdD - University of California, Los Angeles, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing
More informationCONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS
CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS No. 18 (replaces IB 2008-21) April 2012 In 2008, the State Education Department (SED) issued a guidance document to the field regarding the
More informationWorld s Best Workforce Plan
2017-18 World s Best Workforce Plan District or Charter Name: PiM Arts High School, 4110-07 Contact Person Name and Position Matt McFarlane, Executive Director In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section
More informationInstitution of Higher Education Demographic Survey
Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey Data from all participating institutions are aggregated for the comparative studies by various types of institutional characteristics. For that purpose,
More informationMissouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development
Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development Missouri 4-H Key Award Purpose To Encourage: A quality educational programs for all members. A safe environment where all youth feel
More informationUniversity of Arizona
Annual Report Submission View Questionnaire (Edit) University of Arizona Annual Report Submission for the year 2009. Report has been submitted 1 times. Report was last submitted on 11/30/2009 7:12:09 PM.
More informationFTE General Instructions
Florida Department of Education Bureau of PK-20 Education Data Warehouse and Office of Funding and Financial Reporting FTE General Instructions 2017-18 Questions and comments regarding this publication
More informationADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Student Clubs Portland Public Schools believes that student clubs are an integral part of the educational program of the Portland school system. All student clubs must apply to the school for recognition
More informationBest Colleges Main Survey
Best Colleges Main Survey Date submitted 5/12/216 18::56 Introduction page 1 / 146 BEST COLLEGES Data Collection U.S. News has begun collecting data for the 217 edition of Best Colleges. The U.S. News
More informationBellevue University Admission Application
Bellevue University Admission Application Bellevue University is an open admissions university. Once you submit your application, we will begin the process of evaluating your credits and developing your
More information12-month Enrollment
12-month Enrollment 2016-17 Institution: Potomac State College of West Virginia University (237701) Overview 12-month Enrollment Overview The 12-Month Enrollment component collects unduplicated student
More informationArthur E. Wright Middle School 1
A.E. Wright Middle School 4029 N. Las Virgenes Road, Calabasas, CA 91302 (818) 880-4614 Fax (818) 878-0453 Serving Grades Six through Eight CDS Code: 19-64683-6014781 aewrightmiddleschool.net Elias Miles,
More informationTITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION
ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 25 TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : PERSONNEL Section 25.10 Accredited Institution PART 25 CERTIFICATION
More informationGuidelines for the Iowa Tests
Guidelines for the Iowa Tests Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS), Grades K-8 Iowa Test of Educational Development (ITED), Grades 9-12 PLAN B GIFTED PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY 2015-2016 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC
More informationGovernors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Summary In today s competitive global economy, our education system must prepare every student to be successful
More informationRhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information
School Address - 2016 Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information Rhyne Elementary School Courier Number 360484 1900 West Davidson Avenue Phone Number 704-866-6098
More informationRECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS
CHAPTER V: RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS RULE 5.1 RECRUITMENT Section 5.1.1 Announcement of Examinations RULE 5.2 EXAMINATION Section 5.2.1 Determination of Examinations 5.2.2 Open Competitive Examinations
More informationTransportation Equity Analysis
2015-16 Transportation Equity Analysis Each year the Seattle Public Schools updates the Transportation Service Standards and bus walk zone boundaries for use in the upcoming school year. For the 2014-15
More informationMinnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) To be submitted to the U.S. Department of Education in September 2017 IMPORTANT NOTE: This is an early draft prepared for
More informationState Parental Involvement Plan
A Toolkit for Title I Parental Involvement Section 3 Tools Page 41 Tool 3.1: State Parental Involvement Plan Description This tool serves as an example of one SEA s plan for supporting LEAs and schools
More informationUniversity of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes
University of Utah FRESHMAN-COHORT GRADUATION RATES All Students Student-Athletes # 2009-10 Graduation Rate 64% 64% Four-Class Average 61% 64% Student-Athlete Graduation Success Rate 87% 1. Graduation-Rates
More informationGeorge A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During
George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2015-16 School Year Published During 2016-17 By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required
More information