The University of Texas at El Paso. Accountability Report

Transcription

1 The University of Texas at El Paso Accountability Report January 2016 Accountability System, January of 23

2 Participation - Key Measures Enrollment 1. Fall headcount (unduplicated) Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 % Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2015 Institutional Gaps Target- Fall 2015 Gaps Completion Total* 15,224 23,043 23, % 25, % White 2,256 (14.8%) 1,972 (8.6%) 1,875 (8.0%) % 2, % African American 370 (2.4%) 708 (3.1%) 722 (3.1%) 95.1% % Hispanic 10,588 (69.5%) 18,331 (79.6%) 18,624 (79.9%) 75.9% 19, % Asian 207 (1.4%) 236 (1.0%) 246 (1.1%) 18.8% International 1,763 (11.6%) 1,535 (6.7%) 1,592 (6.8%) - 9.7% Other 40 (0.3%) 261 (1.1%) 249 (1.1%) 522.5% Flex Entry N/A Source: Coordinating Board Management (CBM) Report 001 Source: Coordinating Board Management (CBM) Report 001 The increase in Hispanic student enrollment reflects UTEP's success in achieving its mission to create a broad range of quality higher education opportunities for residents of the greater El Paso region. With a student enrollment that mirrors the demographics of the region it serves, UTEP is making a significant contribution to the State's Hispanic student participation goals articulated in " Gaps. Reinforcing UTEP's impact on the State's higher education participation and success goals is the fact that 50% of the freshman students at UTEP in Fall 2015 were first- generation college students, and 55% of the graduates in were first-generation college graduates, confirming UTEP s success in graduating Hispanic students, both transfers and first-time freshmen. Full-Time Equivalent Enrollment 2. Fall semester credit hours (SCH) includes undergraduate(15), master's(12), doctoral(9), special-professional(12), and optometry(17). Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 % Change Fall 2015 Total FTSEs 11,299 16,770 16, % State-Funded FTSEs 11,270 16,448 16, % NOTE: The percentage change is based on the actual FTE numbers and may vary slightly from the calculation produced by the rounded numbers. Post-baccalaureate students are counted separately from master s for headcount enrollment and are counted with master s for FTE enrollment calculations. Participation - Contextual Measures Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Point Change Fall First-time undergraduates from Texas top 10% and Texas top 11-25% Students in Texas top 10% 10.2% 16.0% 16.1% 5.9 Students in Texas top 11-25% N/A 18.5% 20.6% N/A 4. First-time entering applicants accepted 5. First-time accepted, enrolled 94.8% 99.9% 100.0% % 45.6% 46.9% Additional applicant data is available at: Accountability System, January of 23

3 FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2000 to FY Racial and ethnic composition of Texas public high school graduates White 51.5% 34.7% 34.2% African American 12.9% 12.9% 12.6% -0.3 Hispanic 32.1% 46.4% 46.8% 14.7 Asian 3.2% 4.0% 4.2% 1.0 Other 0.3% 2.1% 2.2% 1.9 UG Students by SCH taken at 2-year colleges 7. UG Students by SCH taken at 2-year colleges Fall UG Enrollment Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Point Rate Fall UG Enrollment Rate Fall UG Enrollment Rate Change Fall 2015 UG Students 12,955 (100%) 19,815 (100%) 20,216 (100%) 0-12 hours 1,738 (13.4%) 2,726 (13.8%) 2,550 (12.6% ) hours 732 (5.7%) 1,424 (7.2%) 1,425 (7.0% ) hours 195 (1.5%) 410 (2.1%) 414 (2.0% ) hours 556 (4.3%) 939 (4.7%) 947 (4.7% ) hours 629 (4.9%) 1,384 (7.0%) 1,442 (7.1% ) hours 230 (1.8%) 1,118 (5.6%) 1,184 (5.9% ) hours 1,379 (10.6%) 2,555 (12.9%) 2,462 (12.2% ) 1.6 All Students with SCH at TX 2-Yr college 5,459 (42.1%) 10,556 (53.3%) 10,424 (51.6% ) 9.5 Awarded Core 0 (0.0%) 1,201 (6.1%) 1,131 (5.6% ) 5.6 Associate Degree 442 (3.4%) 3,590 (18.1%) 3,693 (18.3% ) 14.9 For data about SCHs taken for dual credit by institution, go to Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 %/Point Change Fall Semester credit hours Total undergraduate semester credit hours 153, , , % Total graduate semester credit hours 12,239 21,078 20, % Percentage graduate SCH to total SCH 7.4 % 8.6 % 8.2% 0.8 The increase in undergraduate-level credit hour production since Fall 2000 reflects UTEP's efforts to improve term-to-term retention, course completion and progression (which also leads to more efficient degree completion) through class scheduling changes, degree plan revisions, and more intrusive academic advising. This growth in SCH has occurred in the context of a dramatic increase in the number of baccalaureate degrees awarded each year (95% growth between FY 2000 and ). The increase in graduate-level credit hour production since Fall 2000 reflects UTEP s success in creating additional post-baccalaureate opportunities for residents of the greater El Paso region, and a growing understanding by UTEP s largely first-generation and working-class students of the importance of pursuing graduate and professional degrees. Accountability System, January of 23

4 Participation - Out-of-State Peers Out-of-state peer data is from the Fall 2014 IPEDS report and may not match accountability data because of differences in the source of the data. Accountability measures are primarily derived from institutional data sent to the CB for CBM reports. Data reported on this out-of-state peer link is obtained from the IPEDS system of institutional reporting to the federal government. Data differences may result from different reporting periods and different definitions for the data elements. Options Return to the Participation Page Download Excel Version Out-of-State Peer Measures and Definitions Headcount Enrollment Headcount enrolled for credit, disaggregated by race/ethnicity. The University of Texas at El Paso Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers NEW MEXICO-MAIN OKLAHOMA-NORMAN Institution's Out-of-State Peers UNIVERSITY OF AKRON MAIN UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS NEVADA-LAS VEGAS Total 23,079 27,844 27,261 23,962 21,059 28,515 White 1,978 10,762 16,363 17,240 10,801 11,278 African American ,432 2,806 7,135 2,137 Hispanic 18,357 11,308 2, ,482 Asian , ,420 Other 1,872 4,135 5,880 2,767 1,715 4,198 Full-Time Equivalent Enrollment Full-time equivalent for the institution. The full-time equivalent of part-time enrollment is estimated by multiplying the part-time enrollment by factors that vary by control and level of institution and level of student. Total 17,815 23,056 23,447 20,354 16,987 23,206 Fall 2015 Enrollment Detail - The University of Texas at El Paso Participation By 2015, close the gaps in participation rates across Texas to add 630,000 more students. By Level, Age: Total 20,216 2, ,308 By Level, Race/Ethnicity: Age Group Undergraduate Master's Doctor's Research/ Professional Post- Scholarship Specialty Baccalaureate Total Under to 21 10, , to 24 4, , to 29 2, , to 34 1, , and over 1, ,184 Ethnicity Undergraduate Master's Doctor's Research/ Professional Post- Scholarship Specialty Baccalaureate Total White 1, ,875 African American Hispanic 16,735 1, ,624 Asian International 1, ,592 Other Total 20,216 2, ,308 By Level, Gender: Accountability System, January of 23

5 Gender Undergraduate Master's Doctor's Research/ Professional Post- Scholarship Specialty Baccalaureate Total Male 9, ,725 Female 10,858 1, ,583 Total 20,216 2, ,308 By Undergraduate Status: Undergraduate Full-time Part-time White African American Hispanic Asian Other Male Female First-Time in College 3,156 2, , ,436 1,720 First-Time Transfer (from two- and four-year institutions) 1,842 1, , Other Undergraduate 15,218 9,287 5,931 1, , ,062 8,156 Total 20,216 13,079 7,137 1, , ,336 9,358 10,858 Fall 2015 Enrollment Detail - The University of Texas at El Paso Participation By 2015, close the gaps in participation rates across Texas to add 630,000 more students. Lower-Division SCH Upper Division SCH Undergraduate SCH Master's SCH Doctor's Research/ Scholarship SCH Professional Specialty SCH Optometry SCH Total SCH Total 143,325 83, ,068 16,155 3, ,433 16,928 State-Funded 140,756 81, ,904 16,080 3, ,194 16,577 Distance Education Semester Credit Hours Hybrid/Blended on campus Fully-distance education/internet Lower-Division SCH Upper Division SCH Undergraduate SCH Master's SCH Doctor's Research/ Scholarship SCH Professional Specialty SCH Optometry SCH Total SCH 13,384 3,330 16,714 1, ,069 1,230 10,656 7,741 18,397 1, ,292 1,385 FTSE FTSE Accountability System, January of 23

6 Success - Key Measures Graduation Rate: 4-, 5-, and 6-Year 9. First-time, full-time entering, degree-seeking, students enrolled in a minimum of 12 SCH their first fall semester who have graduated from the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change Entering Entering Entering Entering FY Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate 2000 to Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort 4-Year graduation rate , % , % , % , % 11.5 Same institution 2.7% 12.0% 14.8% 13.8% 11.1 Other TX institutions 0.2% 0.7% 0.7% 0.6% Year graduation rate , % , % , % , % 17.9 Same institution 13.2% 29.0% 29.2% 30.9% 17.7 Other TX institutions 1.9% 2.5% 1.7% 2.1% Year graduation rate , % , % , % , % 17.6 Same institution 21.7% 39.5% 38.3% 39.5% 17.8 Other TX institutions 3.0% 3.8% 3.9% 2.8% For more information on the 6-year graduation rate, see: Source: CBM001,CBM002, and CBM009 Although the traditional 4-, 5-, and 6-year graduation rates are improving in general, UTEP continues to be concerned about this flawed measure because it fails to count approximately 70% of UTEP s bachelor s graduates who did not enroll initially as first-time, full-time freshmen at UTEP. As a result of UTEP s highly successful student success initiatives, there was an 95% increase in undergraduate degrees awarded between 2000 and Despite this progress, the graduation-rate metric will continue to grossly understate UTEP s success in fostering student degree completion. Degrees and certificates awarded 10. Number of degrees and certificates awarded. FY 2000 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to Total Degrees* 2,131 4,350 4, % White % African American % Hispanic 1,349 3,186 3, % Asian % International % Other % Institutional Gaps Target- Gaps Completion Level Associates N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A Baccalaureate 1,695 3,214 3, % 3, % Master's % Doctor's Research/Scholarship % % Doctor's Professional Practice N/A N/A Certificates Upper-level certificates N/A N/A N/A N/A Post-baccalaureate certificates N/A N/A *Hispanic students, except international ones, are counted as Hispanic. Students who are "Multi-Racial one of which is African American" are included with the African American students. Asian includes Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders. "Other" includes American Indian, Alaskan Native, Unknown, and two or more races, excluding African American. International students are shown as a separate category. Accountability System, January of 23

7 Gender Male 849 1,939 1, % Female 1,282 2,411 2, % Source: CBM009 Source: CBM009 The overall increase in the number of degrees awarded since FY 2000, especially the growth of degrees awarded to Hispanics, reflects UTEP's significant progress in achieving its high-priority goal of fostering undergraduate student persistence and successful degree completion. In , the last year for which comparable data are available, UTEP ranked 2nd among all U.S. universities in the total number of baccalaureate degrees awarded to Hispanics. 11. Undergraduate degrees to at-risk students FY 2000 FY 2014 Change FY 2000 to Undergraduate Degrees to At-Risk Students 1,024 2,680 2,700 1,676 Gaps Critical Fields: STEM Awards 12. Degrees awarded in STEM fields. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to Institutional Gaps Target- * Gaps Completion* Computer Science* % % Engineering* % % Math* % % Physical Science* % % Level Associate's N/A Baccalaureate % % Master's % Doctor's Research/Scholarship % * Includes baccalaureate and associate degrees. UTEP ranks 2nd in Physical Sciences and 4th in Engineering among all U.S. universities in the number of baccalaureate degrees awarded to Hispanic students. At the Master's level, UTEP ranks 2nd in Engineering among all U.S. universities in the number of degrees awarded to Hispanic students. The significant increase in the number of graduate degrees awarded since FY 2000 reflects UTEP s success in creating additional post-baccalaureate opportunities for residents of the greater El Paso region, and a growing understanding by UTEP s largely first-generation and working-class students of the importance of pursuing graduate and professional degrees. Nursing and Allied Health 13. Degrees and certificates awarded in nursing. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to Institutional Gaps Target- * Gaps Completion* Total Nursing Degrees % Certificate N/A Associates N/A Baccalaureate % % Master's % Doctor's Research/Scholarship N/A Doctor's Professional Practice N/A Accountability System, January of 23

8 * Includes baccalaureate and associate degrees and certificates. 14. Degrees and certificates awarded in allied health. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to Institutional Gaps Target- * Gaps Completion* Total Allied Health Degrees % Certificate N/A Associates N/A Baccalaureate % % Master's % Doctor's Research/Scholarship N/A Doctor's Professional Practice N/A * Includes baccalaureate and associate degrees and certificates. The number of baccalaureate degrees awarded in Allied Health shown in the table reflects only one major, Clinical Laboratory Science, which accounts for only 9% of the total baccalaureate degrees awarded in Allied Health by UTEP. UTEP s College of Health Sciences and the School of Nursing are major contributors to the preparation of health care professionals in the El Paso region, enrolling 4,363 students in Nursing, Physical Therapy, Speech/Language Pathology, Clinical Laboratory Science, Occupational Therapy, Kinesiology, Public Health Sciences, Pharmacy, and Social Work. The increase in total degrees (233%) and Baccalaureate degrees (223%) awarded since FY 2000 in Nursing/Allied Health underscores UTEP's commitment to the region. In , the last year for which comparative data are available, UTEP ranked 3rd among all U.S. universities in the production of Hispanic baccalaureate graduates in Nursing. Teacher Production and Certification 15. Students taking and passing the certification exams for teacher education. FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Total number taking exam Race/Ethnicity White African American 12 * * Hispanic Other Gender Male Female Total percent passing exam 81.0% 83.0% 96.0% Race/Ethnicity White 91.0% 89.0% 99.0% African American 95.0% 100.0% 92.0% Hispanic 78.0% 82.0% 96.0% Other 93.0% 84.0% 100.0% Gender Male 88.0% 85.0% 94.0% Female 79.0% 82.0% 97.0% Note: The data for teacher production and certification was provided by SBEC. In some cases, the sum of the categories does not add up to the total. Numbers less than 10 in a category are suppressed. Data for the most recent year shown may be incomplete. UTEP is the primary provider of new teachers to the region's school districts. 80% of UTEP's students are products of El Paso County school districts, and more than 60% of all area teachers earned degrees at UTEP. UTEP was one of only 11 universities in the U.S. to receive a multi-million dollar grant from the Carnegie Corporation s Teachers for a New Era program to enhance further its outstanding teacher preparation programs in the Colleges of Liberal Arts, Science and Education, and serve as a model for other universities in the U.S. Graduation and Persistence Rate: 6-Year 16. First-time, full-time students enrolled in a minimum of 12 SCH their first fall semester who have graduated or are still enrolled at the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change Entering Entering Entering Entering FY Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate 2000 to Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort Total , % , % , % , % 14.1 Same institution 36.1% 52.4% 49.8% 51.3% 15.2 Other TX institutions 10.2% 10.3% 10.3% 9.1% White % % % % 14.5 Same institution 33.5% 52.6% 40.2% 50.0% 16.5 Other TX institutions 14.1% 13.8% 10.6% 12.0% African American % % % % Same institution 25.5% 32.5% 25.0% 28.6% 3.1 Other TX institutions 5.5% 8.8% 20.0% 1.4% Accountability System, January of 23

9 Hispanic , % , % , % , % 9.9 Same institution 39.3% 52.1% 50.7% 51.2% 11.9 Other TX institutions 11.7% 10.9% 10.5% 9.7% Asian % % % % 11.5 Same institution 34.5% 66.7% 50.0% 44.1% 9.6 Other TX institutions 6.9% 28.6% 16.7% 8.8% 1.9 Other % % % % 45.1 Same institution 25.6% 60.8% 58.5% 69.8% 44.2 Other TX institutions 0.0% 1.5% 3.4% 0.9% 0.9 For more information on the 6-year graduation rate, see: Source: CBM001, CBM002 and CBM009 UTEP's largely first-generation, working-class student population is often hard-pressed to take the number of courses required each semester to complete a degree in four or five years because of heavy family and employment obligations. In addition, these same obligations often lead to re-locations related to job transfers and military re-assignments. The combined graduation/persistence measure recognizes this reality, and provides a means of tracking UTEP students who are enrolled in, and may graduate from, other public or independent universities in the State. However, to be more useful, such a measure would have to extend far beyond Texas university data. Persistence-rate data that do not extend beyond six years also fail to capture those UTEP students who persist well after that. Success - Contextual Measures Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Point Change Fall Enrollment: Percent of first-time students 19 and under 92.3% 97.0% 97.3% 5.0 Fall 2000 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Point Change Fall Financial Aid: Percent of students receiving Pell Grants 40.5% 56.7% 57.3% 16.8 Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Point Change Fall Part-time first-time, degree seeking, undergraduates 9.8% 10.7% 11.7% Persistence rate of first-time, degree-seeking undergraduates: One-Year Entering Cohort Fall 2000 Entering Cohort Fall 2013 Entering Cohort Fall 2014 Point Change Fall 2014 Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Total 2, % 2, % 2, % 6.9 Same institution 64.6% 67.6% 71.8% 7.2 Other TX institutions 9.7% 10.7% 9.4% White % % % 1.5 Same institution 59.9% 65.1% 65.0% 5.1 Other TX institutions 13.4% 10.9% 9.8% African American % % % 10.1 Same institution 59.6% 59.8% 69.7% 10.1 Other TX institutions 5.3% 8.8% 5.3% 0.0 Hispanic 1, % 2, % 2, % 3.0 Same institution 67.5% 67.3% 71.4% 3.9 Other TX institutions 10.8% 11.1% 10.0% Asian % % % Same institution 60.0% 57.1% 66.7% 6.7 Other TX institutions 20.0% 14.3% 5.6% Other % % % 34.7 Same institution 52.4% 82.6% 84.6% 32.2 Other TX institutions 0.8% 4.2% 3.3% 2.5 Accountability System, January of 23

10 21. Persistence rate of first-time, degree-seeking undergraduates: Two-Year Entering Cohort Fall 2000 Entering Cohort Fall 2012 Entering Cohort Fall 2013 Point Change Fall 2013 Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Total 2, % 2, % 2, % 4.8 Same institution 50.2% 58.6% 54.9% 4.7 Other TX institutions 13.4% 12.9% 13.6% 0.2 White % % % 7.4 Same institution 48.0% 43.8% 51.6% 3.6 Other TX institutions 13.4% 14.8% 17.2% 3.8 African American % % % Same institution 35.1% 40.9% 37.3% 2.2 Other TX institutions 17.5% 12.5% 14.7% Hispanic 1, % 2, % 2, % Same institution 55.1% 59.2% 54.9% Other TX institutions 15.5% 13.3% 13.6% Asian % % % Same institution 70.0% 56.5% 42.9% Other TX institutions 5.0% 13.0% 21.4% 16.4 Other % % % 54.4 Same institution 25.4% 68.7% 72.2% 46.8 Other TX institutions 0.8% 6.6% 8.3% 7.5 Developmental Education Fall 2011 Cohort 22. The percent of underprepared and prepared students who successfully complete a college-level course in math, reading and writing. Prepared students are given 1 year. Underprepared students are given 3 years. Total/Area Counts (a) Summary Data Number of FTIC students 2,916 Met state standards in all three areas 2,032 Did not meet state standards in one, two, or all three areas (at entry) 830 Unknown* (unduplicated) 54 Received credit pre-matriculation (b) College level course completion (grade A, B, or C) (c) College level course completion (grade A, B, C) including pre-matriculation credit (percent of total) (b+c)/(a) Data by Subject Area Met Standard Math 2, , % Reading 2, , % Writing 2, , % Did Not Meet Standard Math 410 N/A % Reading 480 N/A % Writing 489 N/A % Unknown** (waived or military exemption) Math** 54 N/A % Reading** 54 N/A % Writing** 54 N/A % Most- and Least-Prepared Populations Met State Standard in All Three Areas Math 2, , % Reading 2, , % Writing 2, , % Did Not Meet Standard in All Three Areas Math 142 N/A % Reading 142 N/A % Writing 142 N/A % The data for this accountability measure is tracked for one year for students who met TSI and for one, two, and three years for students who did not meet TSI for this report. *The Unknown (unduplicated) category does not include students who are unknown in some areas and not met in others. **Unknowns by area include students with waivers or exemptions who have not been reported as meeting TSI on a performance measure; FTIC students with waivers or military exemptions who were reported as meeting TSI in all areas based on performance measures are included in the "met state standards in all areas" category. 23. Underprepared students who satisfied TSI obligation within 2 years. Total/Area Counts (a) Summary Data Number of FTIC students 2,916 Number attempting developmental education (b) Percent attempting developmental education (includes DevEd interventions) (b/a) Fall 2011 Cohort TSI obligations met (of those attempting developmental education) (d) TSI obligations met through any means (of total) (e) TSI obligations met (percent of those attempting developmental education) (d/b) TSI obligations met (percent of total as reported by institution) (e/a) TSI obligations met based on TSI reporting or passed 1st college-level course (percent of total) (e) and/or Passed /(a) Accountability System, January of 23

11 Met state standards in all three 2,032 areas Did not meet state standards in one, two, or all three areas (at 830 entry) Unknown* (unduplicated) 54 Data by Subject Area Met Standard Math 2, % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Reading 2, % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Writing 2, % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Did Not Meet Standard Math % % 29.8% 29.8% Reading % % 75.4% 75.4% Writing % % 63.8% 64.0% Unknown** (waived or military exemption) Math** % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Reading** % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Writing** % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Most- and Least-Prepared Populations Met state standards in all areas Math 2, % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Reading 2, % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Writing 2, % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Did Not Meet Standards in All Three Areas Math % % 23.2% 23.2% Reading % % 69.0% 69.0% Writing % % 52.8% 53.5% *The Unknown (unduplicated) category does not include students who are unknown in some areas and not met in others. **Unknowns by area include students with waivers or exemptions who have not been reported as meeting TSI on a performance measure; FTIC students with waivers or military exemptions who were reported as meeting TSI in all areas based on performance measures are included in the "met state standards in all areas" category. Passed is the number of students who passed a first college-level course as shown on measure # Percent of students who return the following fall. Total (a) Fall 2011 Cohort Number returning (Fall 2012) (b) Percent returning (Fall 2012) (b/a) Summary Data Number of FTIC students 2,916 2, Met state standards in all areas 2,032 1, % Did not meet state standards in one, two, or all three areas % Did not meet state standards in all three areas % Unknown* (unduplicated) % Data by Subject Area Met Standard by Area Math 2,452 1, % Reading 2,382 1, % Writing 2,373 1, % Did Not Meet Standard by Area Math % Reading % Writing % Unknown** by Area (waived or military exemption) Math % Reading % Writing % *The Unknown (unduplicated) category does not include students who are unknown in some areas and not met in others. **Unknowns by area include students with waivers or exemptions who have not been reported as meeting TSI on a performance measure; FTIC students with waivers or military exemptions who were reported as meeting TSI in all areas based on performance measures are included in the "met state standards in all areas" category. FY 2000 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2000 to 25. Graduation of two-year college students 1-29 SCH (before transfer) 16 ( 11.0%) 63 ( 30.4%) 72 ( 35.8%) SCH or more (before transfer) 135 ( 33.8%) 567 ( 49.3%) 530 ( 45.8%) 12.0 Source: CBM001 and CBM Percentage of baccalaureate graduates by SCH completed at two-year colleges: Accountability System, January of 23

12 1-29 SCH (at any time) 36.6% 30.0% 28.4% SCH or more (at any time) 25.8% 35.7% 37.2% 11.4 Source: CBM001 and CBM009. Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Cohort Rate 27. Graduation Rates Master's Fall % Fall % Fall % Doctoral Fall % Fall % Fall % Baccalaureate graduate success 28. Percent of baccalaureate graduates who are employed or enrolled in a Texas graduate program or professional school Baccalaureate Graduates Employment/Enrollment Status 29. Employed in 4th quarter in which program year ends 30. In graduate or professional school in Texas in fall of the next FY 31. Employed in Texas and enrolled in a graduate or professional school in Texas FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2011 to FY % 71.1% 70.4% FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2011 to FY % 59.3% 59.1% % 5.7% 5.0% % 6.0% 6.3% For more detailed information on enrollments and employment of graduates and other leavers, go to: Undergraduate efficiency ratio Ratio of Undergraduate FTSE to Undergraduate Baccalaureate Degrees Awarded Fall 2000 FTSE/ FY 2001 UG Degrees Fall 2013 FTSE/ FY 2014 UG Degrees Fall 2014 FTSE/ UG Degrees N/A Accountability System, January of 23

13 Accountability System, January of 23

14 Graduation Rate: Four, five, and six-year graduation rates of first-time, full-time degree seeking undergraduates. The University of Texas at El Paso Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers NEW MEXICO-MAIN OKLAHOMA-NORMAN Institution's Out-of-State Peers UNIVERSITY OF AKRON MAIN UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS NEVADA-LAS VEGAS 4-Year Rate 12% 15.0% 37.0% 14.0% 15.0% 14.0% 5-Year Rate 29% 37.0% 62.0% 34.0% 35.0% 30.0% 6-Year Rate 38% 47.0% 67.0% 41.0% 44.0% 39.0% Degrees Awarded: Number of graduates by level, race/ethnicity and gender. Total Degrees 4,316 5,575 6,079 5,481 4,423 5,081 Level White 511 2,521 3,781 4,285 2,534 2,336 African American , Hispanic 3,155 1, Asian Other , Associates Bachelors 3,181 3,692 3,913 3,032 2,991 3,764 Master's 993 1,308 1,693 1,171 1, Doctor's Research/Scholarship Gender Doctor's Professional Practice Male 1,901 2,368 3,037 2,658 1,677 2,086 Female 2,415 3,207 3,042 2,823 2,746 2,995 Graduation Rate: Percent of first-time, degree-seeking undergraduates who have graduated after six academic years. Total 38.0% 48.0% 67.0% 42.0% 44.0% 39.0% White 34.0% 52.0% 69.0% 47.0% 51.0% 40.0% African American 20.0% 39.0% 61.0% 13.0% 33.0% 34.0% Hispanic 39.0% 46.0% 60.0% 27.0% 47.0% 35.0% Asian 37.0% 50.0% 78.0% 49.0% 44.0% 41.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 29.0% 53.0% 43.0% 25.0% 9.0% Unknown 34.0% 48.0% N/A 34.0% 56.0% 35.0% Nonresident Alien 48.0% 62.0% 67.0% 59.0% 29.0% 69.0% Graduates in Key Fields: Number of degrees awarded in specific fields by level. Computer Science Engineering Math Physical Science Nursing and Allied-Health Graduates: Number of degrees awarded in nursing/allied-health by level. Total Degrees Certificate Associates Bachelors Master's Doctor's Research/Scholarship Accountability System, January of 23

15 Graduates Detail ( )- The University of Texas at El Paso Success By 2015, increase by 50 percent the number of degrees, certificates, and other identifiable student successes from high quality programs. By Level, Race/Ethnicity: Race/Ethnicity Doctor's Doctor's Associate's Bachelor's Master's Research/ Professional Total Scholarship Practice White African American Hispanic 0 2, ,274 Asian International Other Accountability System, January of 23

16 Excellence - Key Measures Faculty Teaching Fall 2000 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Point Change Fall Tenured/tenure-track faculty teaching lower-division SCH 47.7% 29.1% 26.8% The ratio reflects the fact that state funding has not kept pace with UTEP's enrollment and graduate program growth, leading to a greater reliance on full- and part-time, non-tenure-track faculty to teach lower- division courses. These Lecturers are well qualified to teach lower-division courses, and meet all accreditation requirements. Student/Faculty Ratio 34. Full-time student equivalents (FTSE) divided by full-time equivalent (FTE) faculty. FTSE Fall 2000 FTFE Ratio FTSE Fall 2013 FTFE Ratio FTSE Fall 2014 FTFE Ratio % Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2014 FTSE/FTFE Ratio 11, :1 16, :1 16, :1 15.2% In the context of growing enrollments, reduced State support and the lowest net cost among all U.S. research universities, this modest growth in UTEP s student-faculty ratio over the past five years reflects both the efficiency of campus operations and the strong commitment to invest in areas most likely to promote student success, e.g., enhancing opportunities for students direct interactions with faculty members who help raise their aspirations and build their self-confidence. State and National Exams Success 35. Certification and licensure rates FY 2000 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2012 to Law N/A N/A N/A N/A Pharmacy N/A N/A N/A N/A Nursing 94.7% 83.9% 81.9% Engineering 69.8% 63.2% 78.9% 20.9 Tenured/Tenure-Track FTE Faculty Fall 2000 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Point Change Fall Percent of FTE teaching faculty who are tenured/tenure-track 62.2% 61.9% 59.4% Quality Enhancement Plan 37. Quality Enhancement Plan, Including Reaffirmation Year UTEP s Quality Enhancement Plan, developed and approved as part of the 2006 reaffirmation of accreditation by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, is a Student Success Initiative focused on: (a) curriculum review and renewal of all undergraduate degree programs and the University s general education core curriculum, with the goal of sustaining efficient and purposeful pathways for students to master general college level knowledge and proficiencies as well as specific fields of study (major) knowledge, skills, and dispositions; and (b) academic and career advising redesign to provide students with effective personal and career guidance. Continuous curriculum renewal and effective student advising and mentoring are central to UTEP s mission of providing students access to excellent educational programs. Link: Excellent Programs 38. Excellent Programs Highlighted Excellent Programs 1 The On-Campus Student Employment Program provides undergraduate students meaningful employment that contributes directly to their career objectives and supports the retention and student success efforts of the university. Students are actively engaged in research labs, serve as peer leaders and tutor in subjects such as math, chemistry and physics. The innovative program is based on competitive proposals submitted by campus departments and reviewed annually by a committee of students, faculty and staff. Positions selected must provide professional development that benefits students in their careers beyond UTEP. Each department is required to cost-share 25% of the student s wages which further expands the reach of the program across campus. A recent institutional study found that students employed on campus, for 19 hours a week or less, enhanced their success, lowered their Accountability System, January of 23

17 risk of attrition and increased the probability of timely graduation. The On-Campus Student Employment Program is a proven example of an effective and efficient, student-centered effort that reinforces UTEP s mission of providing access and excellence to a traditionally under-served student demographic. Highlighted Excellent Programs 2 Undergraduate research impacts student learning, retention, graduation rates, interest in further study, job placement and career success. The UTEP Campus Office of Undergraduate Research Initiatives (COURI) formed in 2010 to expand and centralize this practice. COURI helps secure external funding, works with faculty to integrate research into coursework, offers professional development, advises students on choosing mentors and applying to external programs, funds student travel to present at conferences, coordinates funded research programs, collaborates with other institutions for research student exchanges, and organizes a biannual showcase of student work. In 2014, UTEP received a $22.6 million grant from NIH Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) Initiative, which will support UTEP s BUILDing SCHOLARS Center for undergraduate research training. Students from traditionally underrepresented groups in biomedical sciences and engineering will be mentored on projects in critical areas related to health on the US-Mexico border. These activities lie at the core of UTEP s goal to become the first national research university with a 21st century student demographic. Excellence - Contextual Measures Fall 2000 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Point Change Fall FTE tenured/tenure-track faculty demographics Ethnicity Total 62.2% 61.9% 59.4%* White 64.0% 65.1% 61.5% African American 42.5% 61.3% 71.3% 28.8 Hispanic 57.4% 52.6% 50.8% Asian 69.4% 89.0% 87.5% 18.1 International N/A 51.3% 47.7% N/A Other 57.1% 55.6% 32.3% Gender Male 70.9% 73.6% 68.7% Female 47.5% 46.1% 46.5% *Hispanic faculty members, except international ones, are counted as Hispanic. Faculty who are "Multi-Racial one of which is African American" are included with the African American faculty. Asian includes Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders. "Other" includes American Indian, Alaskan Native, Unknown, and two or more races, excluding African American. International faculty are shown as a separate category. Faculty Rank Teaching Assistants Other Faculty Instructor Assistant Professor Associate Professor Professor 40. Faculty Rank (Fall 2014) Faculty Ethnicity Total* White African American Hispanic Asian International Other Faculty Gender Male Female *Hispanic faculty members, except international ones, are counted as Hispanic. Faculty who are "Multi-Racial one of which is African American" are included with the African American faculty. Asian includes Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders. "Other" includes American Indian, Alaskan Native, Unknown, and two or more races, excluding African American. International faculty are shown as a separate category. Faculty Salary by Rank FY 2002 FY 2014 % Change FY 2002 to National Average () % National Average 41. Faculty Salary Comparisons Professor $73,133 $105,273 $110, % $117,155 94% Associate Professor $56,391 $75,560 $79, % $83,243 96% Assistant Professor $48,287 $71,062 $72, % $71, % Instructor $0 $0 N/A $49,231 0% Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 %/Point Change Fall Endowed Professorships and Chairs % Percent unfilled 3.0% 19.0% 16.9% 13.9 Percent of total tenured/tenure-track faculty 7.0% 12.5% 12.6% 5.6 Accountability System, January of 23

18 43. Nobel Prize Winners and National Academies FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2013 to American Academy of Nursing % 44. Other Faculty Awards FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2013 to FY 2015 Fulbright American Scholars N/A National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) Fellows N/A Vacant endowed faculty positions are being used strategically to recruit new, more senior faculty members who can assume leadership roles in continuing to build UTEP's research capacity and development as an emerging National Research (or Tier One) University. To pursue the institution's graduate program and research development agendas, UTEP must be able to offer competitive salaries to recruit and to retain the best qualified faculty. In a context of growing enrollment and declining State support, such competitiveness becomes even more difficult. UTEP expects that its relatively new doctoral programs will serve as a source of future Hispanic Ph.D.'s, thereby increasing the size of the national pool of future Hispanic faculty members. Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty Percentage of all full-time faculty members who are tenured or tenure-track. Percent of Tenured/Tenure-Track faculty The University of Texas at El Paso Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers NEW MEXICO-MAIN OKLAHOMA-NORMAN Institution's Out-of-State Peers AKRON MAIN UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS NEVADA-LAS VEGAS 67% 54% 80% 74% 72% 74% Accountability System, January of 23

19 Research - Key Measures Federal and Private Research FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to 45. Federal and private research expenditures per FTE faculty $65,176 $97,898 $119, % Research Expenditures 46. Research expenditures ($ Million) FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to Institutional Gaps Target- Fall 2015 Gaps Completion $ $ $ % $ % Sponsored Research Funds FY 2011 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2011 to 47. Federal and private (sponsored) research funds per revenue appropriations. 40.3% 41.3% 42.9% 2.6 Source: THECB Annual Research Expenditures Report and Sources & Uses Source: THECB Annual Research Expenditures Report and Sources & Uses Research - Contextual Measures FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to 48. Research Expenditures by Source ($ Millions) $ $ $ % Federal $ $ $ % State $3.278 $ $ % Private $1.325 $ $ % Institutional $1.528 $ $ % Restricted Research Expenditures (amount shown is a subset of the categories above) $ $ $ % For information on restricted research expenditures, go to FY 2009 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2009 to 49. Faculty holding extramural research grants Number % Percent 37% 36% 36% 41% 4.0 Patents 50. Number of new U.S. patents issued or reissued. 51. Number of new patent applications FY 2001 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to N/A % Accountability System, January of 23

20 The 194% increase in total research expenditures over the last fourteen fiscal years is a reflection of the research capacity-building process that is well underway at UTEP. Research Expenditures Current year research expenditures. Research Expenditures The University of Texas at El Paso Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers NEW MEXICO-MAIN OKLAHOMA-NORMAN Institution's Out-of-State Peers AKRON MAIN UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS NEVADA-LAS VEGAS $73,550,383 $197,544,068 $116,542,000 $43,442,569 $50,079,536 $40,462,000 Research Funds Amount of sponsored (external/federal) research funds. Federal Research Funds $44,162,926 $189,067,209 $61,388,000 $21,274,696 $25,925,616 $42,343,000 Source: IPEDS Fall 2014 Accountability System, January of 23

21 Institutional Efficiency and Effectiveness - Key Measures Administrative Cost FY 2000 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2000 to 52. Administrative costs as a percent of operating budget 10.4% 7.8% 7.5% UTEP continues to work diligently and successfully to reduce administrative costs and to achieve efficiencies in all aspects of its operations. This effort is particularly important in the context of the higher education cost-shifting that is occurring as State funding declines and students bear a greater share of the cost of their education through increased tuition and fees. Space Usage Efficiency (SUE) 53. Space usage efficiency measure of the effectiveness and efficiency of existing teaching space utilization. Classroom and lab passing score is 75 and overall passing score is 150. Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Classroom space use efficiency Lab space use efficiency Overall space use efficiency UTEP has achieved significant strides in using its facilities more efficiently. Classroom and Lab utilization have increased significantly since Appropriated Funds per FTE Faculty 54. State appropriations divided by full-time equivalent students and annual full-time equivalent teaching faculty. FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to Appropriated funds per FTE student $5,940 $6,164 $6, % Appropriated funds per FTE faculty $59,811 $70,466 $78, % Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) FY 2000 FY 2014 %/Point Change FY 2000 to 55. HUB Expenditures without construction (Millions) $ $ $ % Percent of total expenditures 8.2% 19.9% 13.1% 4.9 HUB Expenditures with construction (Millions) $ $ $ % Percent of total expenditures 13.1% 25.2% 18.1% 5.0 Reflecting the University's strong commitment to HUB participation, UTEP's total HUB expenditures, excluding construction, have increased by 219% from FY 2000 to and have increased by 177% during this same period when construction costs are included. Among the strategies that have proven highly successful is an energetic outreach program to small and family-owned businesses in the El Paso community. UTEP's support of Historically Underutilized Businesses is another critical measure of our economic impact on the region. Operating Expenses per FTE Student FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to 56. Operating expenses per FTE student $14,035 $17,265 $18, % Total Revenue per FTE Student and FTE teaching Faculty FY 2000 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to 57. Total revenue Per FTE student $13,271 $18,859 $20, % Per FTE faculty $135,653 $215,611 $232, % Accountability System, January of 23

22 UTEP is striving to achieve an appropriate balance between quality and affordability in a context of declining State appropriations. This balance is particularly critical in a setting such as UTEP where so many students struggle to finance their education. UTEP is highly entrepreneurial in seeking other sources of support for its programs, and has been highly successful in attracting private-sector support from individuals and corporate partners. However, much of this revenue is restricted by the donors and cannot be used to subsidize daily operations. Institutional Efficiency and Effectiveness - Contextual Measures Class Size Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 %/Point Change Fall Average class size % Median class size % 59. Percentage of undergraduate classes with less than 20 students 60. Percentage of undergraduate classes with 50 students or more 32.7% 31.2% 30.6% % 15.4% 14.3% 3.2 Limiting the size of lower-division classes, in a context of overall enrollment growth and reduced State appropriations, continues to be a challenge. FY 2000 FY 2016 % Change FY 2000 to FY Average cost of resident undergraduate tuition and fees for 30 SCH. $2,975 $7,018 $7, % Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 % Change Fall E&G Square footage E&G classroom per FTE student % E&G lab per FTE student % Endowment 63. True and Term Endowment ($ millions) 64. Quasi Endowment ($ millions) 65. Total Endowment ($ millions) 66. Total Endowment - Per FTE student FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2011 to $158.0 $177.6 $199.9 $196.9 $17.0 $18.8 $21.1 $20.3 $175.0 $196.5 $221.0 $ % $9,910 $11,054 $12,253 $11, % FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to 67. Total Revenue* $167,583,580 $340,175,717 $374,688, % State appropriations $73,018,820 $111,175,933 $127,292, % Tuition and fees $34,220,271 $97,008,096 $103,430, % Federal grants and contracts $41,823,765 $97,230,522 $111,094, % Institutional resources $18,520,724 $34,761,166 $32,871, % Constitutional funds $0 $0 $0 N/A Total Revenue with Constitutional Funds $167,583,580 $340,175,717 $374,688, % *Does not include Constitutional Funds Link to additional information: Although UTEP has raised tuition and fees to ensure quality at a time of declining State support, such increases have been comparatively modest, and the total cost of enrollment to UTEP students remains at the very low end of peer institutions within the State. In fact, UTEP s net price is the lowest among all research universities in the U.S. UTEP continues to generate significant new revenues through successful fund-raising and entrepreneurial activities. UTEP s TRB requests have been focused on accommodating growing enrollment and expanded research activity, and the ROI on such investments in UTEP have exceeded those at most peer institutions. The University of Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers Institution's Out-of-State Peers Accountability System, January of 23

23 Administrative Cost Ratio Amount expended for administrative costs as a percent of operative expenses Administrative costs as a percent of operating budget University of Texas at El Paso NEW MEXICO-MAIN OKLAHOMA-NORMAN AKRON MAIN UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS NEVADA-LAS VEGAS 4% 2% 3% 7% 4% 3% Appropriations State and local government appropriation revenues per FTE student. Appropriations per FTE student $4,962 $11,084 $6,414 $4,333 $5,734 $6,346 Expenditures Instruction expenses per FTE student. Instruction expenses per FTE student $6,847 $11,745 $12,188 $9,013 $9,720 $8,805 Tuition and Fees Tuition and Fee revenue per FTE student. Tuition and Fee Revenue per FTE student $5,661 $5,411 $11,150 $9,669 $7,951 $6,961 Accountability System, January of 23