Al 2. Partnership Maps x 2 y 2 = z 2. F = Gm 1 m 2. A = πr 2. Appendix A: 197.0

Transcription

1 Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 Appendix A: A = πr 2 Partnership Maps x 2 y 2 = z 2 79 Au F = Gm 1 m 2 /r

2 Public Works, Inc. 4 8 Cohort 3 Partnerships & 1 San Benito County and Academy for Rural Teachers 2 Baldwin Park Math Partnership 13 Central Coast and Partnership 14 West Contra Costa Math and Partnership 4 Colusa County Learning Community 5 Exemplary Content Coaching Enhancing Learning 6 Redwood Area Algebra for All 7 Students Exceling in Systematic Math Through Instructional Change 9 Monterey Bay Math Collaborative 10 Opens Doors 11 Support Initiative 12 Teacher s Collaborative Algebra Accessibility Project Collaboration for Success in Partnership 8 Success for All Key & Only Only CaMSP 2009 Report Page A-1

3 California Department of Education Cohort 4 Partnerships 1 South Bay Collaborative 3 Imperial County Partnership 5 Lincoln Achievement in Partnership 6 Achievement in Little Lake for 7 Pajaro Valley USD Partnership 8 Pasadena Math Pipeline 9 Ravenswood Learning Collaborative for Student Acheivement 10 Sacramento Algebra Collaborative 11 ELDI ARISE 12 Developing Communities of Mathematical Inquiry Carpinteria & Santa Barbara School-Community Initiative 4 Learning Activities through Kelseyville s Exemplary (LAKE) Collaborative Key 6 12 Only Only 3 Page A-2 Appendix A: Partnership Maps

4 Public Works, Inc. 3 9 Cohort 5 Partnerships 2 Professional Learning Community 3 Wild Rivers Academy 7 Rigorous Instruction in Study 8 Partners as Resources to Improve Education 9 Shasta County Partnership 10 Washington Union CaMSP Collaborating for Excellence in Middle School 4 Excellence in Instruction 5 Collaborative for Success in 6 Inquiry-based Readiness Academy & Sustainability Key Only Only CaMSP 2009 Report Page A-3

5 California Department of Education 11 Cohort 6 Partnerships 1 A-TEAM 2 Expert Teachers x Explicit Math Instruction = Exemplary Student Achievement 3 Success in Understanding Math 4 Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District 5 Fresno Academy 6 North East Bay Collaborative 8 Preparing for Success in Algebra 10 Salinas City Partnership 12 Project IMPACT 13 Whittier City School District 7 Kings Canyon Unified School District Project 9 Partners for Outstanding Education 11 Shasta COE Model Academy for Reflective Teaching Key Only Only 9 3 Page A-4 Appendix A: Partnership Maps

6 Public Works, Inc. 3 Cohort Research Partnerships 1 Project Algebra Preparedness 2 Strategic and Intensive Initiative 3 North State Math Partnership 4 Central Valley Math Project 5 Los Angeles Unified School District Program 6 Working Together to Improve Education Key 1 Only Only CaMSP 2009 Report Page A-5

7 California Department of Education Page A-6 Appendix A: Partnership Maps

8 Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 Appendix B: A = πr 2 Tables x 2 y 2 = z 2 79 Au F = Gm 1 m 2 /r

9 Public Works, Inc. Appendix Table 1: List of Cohort 1 Partnerships by Lead District and El Rancho USD Coachella Valley USD Del Norte COE Lennox ESD El Centro ESD Fresno USD N. Monterey County USD Los Angeles USD Montebello USD San Pasqual Valley USD San Francisco USD Rialto USD Stockton City USD Salinas ESD* Tulare COE Themalito Union ESD* West Covina USD * Discontinued in 2005 during the mid-course review Appendix Table 2: List of Cohort 2 Partnership by Lead District and Alameda COE Hacienda La Puente USD* Chula Vista ESD Alhambra USD San Joaquin COE Emery USD Bellevue ESD* Tulare City ESD Franklin - McKinley ESD* Central USD Yreka Union ESD* Garvey ESD Gonzales USD Lodi USD Jefferson ESD Palmdale ESD Live Oak ESD Redwood City ESD* Pajaro Valley USD* Yolo COE Red Bluff Union ESD San Diego COE Sanger USD Vallejo City Whittier City ESD * Discontinued in 2006 during the mid-course review CaMSP 2009 Report Page B-1

10 California Department of Education Appendix Table 3: List of Cohort 3 Partnerships by Lead District & Colusa COE Centralia ESD Aromas/San Juan USD Fullerton ESD Marysville Joint USD Baldwin Park USD Healdsburg USD Santa Maria - Bonita ESD Lake Elsinore USD Vista USD Lawndale ESD* West Contra Costa USD Monterey Peninsula USD Wiseburn ESD* Palm Springs USD San Leandro USD San Rafael City ESD* * Discontinued in 2007 during the mid-course review Appendix Table 4: List of Cohort 4 Partnerships by Lead District Alum Rock ESD Imperial COE Lincoln USD Little Lake CSD Pajaro Valley USD Pasadena USD Ravenswood CSD Sacramento USD Santa Clara USD Westminster USD Carpinteria USD Kelseyville USD Oakland USD* * Discontinued in 2008 during the mid-course review Appendix Table 5: List of Cohort 5 Partnerships by Lead District Chico USD Del Norte County USD Placer COE San Francisco USD Shasta COE Washington Union HSD Anaheim High USD Elk Grove USD Lake Elsinore USD Lynwood USD Page B-2 Appendix B: Tables

11 Public Works, Inc. Appendix Table 6: List of Cohort Research Partnerships by Lead District Alameda COE El Rancho ESD Red Bluff ESD Sanger USD Los Angeles USD San Francisco USD Appendix Table 7: List of Cohort 6 Partnerships by Lead District Antioch USD Central USD Coachella Valley USD Fairfield -Suisun USD Fresno USD John Swett USD Los Angeles USD Salinas City ESD Upland USD Whittier City ESD Kings Canyon USD Ontario Montclair SD Shasta COE CaMSP 2009 Report Page B-3

12 Regression Tables California Department of Education Table 8: Regression Analysis of 2008 Combined CSTs and Algebra I CST Scaled Scores with Treatment, Prior Achievement and Demographic Variables as Predictors (Pooled) Combined (Pooled) Algebra I Variables β t p β t p Partnership Treatment Prior Achievement (2007 CST) Hispanic White Filipino Asian English Only English Language Learner Poverty (NSLP) Special Education Gifted and Talented Observations 86,190 18,162 R-squared Page B-4 Appendix B: Tables

13 Public Works, Inc. Table 9: Regression Analysis of 2008 Combined CSTs and Algebra I CST Scaled Scores for Cohorts 1, 3 and 4 with Treatment, Prior Achievement and Demographic Variables as Predictors (Cohort 1) Algebra I (Cohort 3) Combined Variables β t p β t p Partnership Treatment Prior Achievement (2007 CST) White Filipino Asian African American English Language Learner Redesignated Fluent Eng. Prof Poverty (NSLP) Special Education Gifted and Talented Observations 5,562 24,246 R-squared (Cohort 3) Algebra I (Cohort 4) Combined Variables β t p β t p Partnership Treatment Prior Achievement (2007 CST) White Filipino Asian African American English Language Learner Redesignated Fluent Eng. Prof Poverty (NSLP) Special Education Gifted and Talented Observations 3,952 11,338 R-squared CaMSP 2009 Report Page B-5

14 California Department of Education Table 10: Regression Analysis of 2008 Combined CSTs and Fifth Grade CST Scaled Scores with Treatment, Prior Achievement and Demographic Variables as Predictors (Pooled) Combined (5th & 8th Gr.) CSTs (Pooled) 5th Grade CSTs Variables β t p β t p Partnership Treatment White Filipino Asian African American English Language Learner Redesignated Fluent Eng. Prof Poverty (NSLP) Special Education Gifted and Talented Observations 22,828 10,882 R-squared Page B-6 Appendix B: Tables