The APA 2012 Annual Report Online Commission on Accreditation Portal Survey Report
|
|
- Samantha Jordan
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Commission on Accreditation, Office of Program Consultation & Accreditation The APA 2012 Annual Report Online Commission on Accreditation Portal Survey Report American Psychological Association, Washington D.C.
2 Introduction The Annual Report Online (ARO) was first implemented electronically in 2002 for collection of data utilized exclusively by the American Psychological Association (APA) for accreditation of doctoral, internship, and postdoctoral programs that educate and train future psychologists. Annually, all APA accredited programs are required to submit data on their program, students and faculty to an online data collection system. A little over a year ago, the Office of Program Consultation and Accreditation (OPCA), on behalf of the Commission on Accreditation (CoA), contracted a Boston-based IT company, Liaison International, to build a new and improved eaccreditation platform online. This new platform is now known as the CoA Portal and will move many accreditation processes now completed on paper to an electronic process. The CoA Portal debuted in 2012 launching the first ARO in the new CoA Portal. The 2012 ARO opened on June 4, 2012 and closed on September 15, The ARO closed with about 99% of doctoral and internship programs and 100% of postdoctoral programs submitting their data by the September 15 th deadline, one of the most successful years for ontime ARO submission. Following the closing of the ARO the CoA planned to evaluate the new eaccreditation platform by surveying registered Portal users. The survey serves as a reference for the CoA in its implementation of changes in the Portal in terms of content, functionality and utility of the site. About 25% of registered Portal users submitted completed surveys. The aim of this report is to inform stakeholders and the general public about the results of the survey and the action taken by the Commission in response to the feedback provided. This report presents raw data, some in aggregate form, and shows the distribution of survey responses, as well as some follow-up analyses that summarize the results. However, due to the nature of the survey, mainly because survey items were not confirmed through any means of factor analysis for validation purposes, summarized results wield no interpretive strength. Methodology The Research department implemented the survey campaign using Surveygizmo. Liaison supplied a spreadsheet containing contact information for all registered CoA Portal users, which totaled The CoA-approved survey was opened to respondents on December 5, 2012 and closed on December 31, Eleven hundred eighty-nine s successfully reached valid inboxes. One reminder was sent out on December 18, 2012, of those, 2 did not reach a valid inbox and were returned. Registered CoA Portal users received an that contained a direct link to the survey located on the Surveygizmo website and were guaranteed that their responses would remain anonymous. The survey was not password protected and the site settings permitted multiple uses of the distributed survey link. The survey consisted of 30 multiple-choice questions, of which 22 were Likert-scale items ranging from 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree (Appendix A). Testing by research staff found completion of the survey to take approximately 5 minutes. The Likert-scale items were categorized based on content among three domain variables: Overall portal use, Usability, or Performance/Navigation (Appendix A). For example overall Portal use included items related to overall confidence in quality of data entered and website design. These domains were not derived scientifically. 1
3 Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics and some exploratory analysis were performed. Frequency distributions were reported (N and %). Crosstabulation tables were used to explore relationships between variables. Following exploration of the data, Pearson s chi square statistic was reported for statistically significant correlations. Statistical significance was set at p due to the explorative nature of the analyses. Results A total of 335 surveys were returned, of those 292 were completed and 43 were partially completed. Four surveys marked as partially complete were removed from the analysis due to the fact that no answers were logged for any of the question items. I. Respondent characteristic Table 1. Program information by respondent role in program Program Program Type director/faculty Administration Doctoral only 84 (40.6) 97 (78.9) 181 (54.7) Internship only 95 (45.9) 12 (9.8) 108 (32.6) Postdoc only 12 (5.8) 3 (2.4) 15 (4.5) Doctoral+Internship 4 (1.9) 7 (5.7) 11 (3.3) Doctoral+Postdoc 1 (0.5) 0 (0) 1 (0.3) Internship+Postdoc 11 (5.3) 2 (1.6) 13 (3.9) All 0 (0) 2 (1.6) 2 (0.6) Number Accred Programs Data Entered (93.7) 104 (83.9) 298 (90) 2 or 3 13 (6.3) 20 (16.1) 33 (10) 2
4 Table 2. System use by respondent role in program Program Participation in webinar training director/faculty Administration Yes 86 (41.5) 72 (58.1) 158 (47.7) No 121 (58.5) 52 (41.9) 173 (52.3) Role in data entry All 144 (70) 79 (63.7) 223 (67.6) Most 18 (8.7) 25 (20.2) 43 (13) Half 4 (1.9) 13 (10.5) 17 (5.2) Some 16 (7.8) 3 (2.4) 19 (5.8) A little 12 (5.8) 2 (1.6) 14 (4.2) None 12 (5.8) 2 (1.6) 14 (4.2) Table 3. Type of web browser used to enter data Browser type Internet Explorer 167 (50.7) Firefox 73 (22.2) Chrome 41 (12.5) Safari 28 (8.5) Unknown 56 (17) 3
5 II. Survey Results by Domain Table 4. Overall use of Portal site Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree N Overall satisfaction with CoA Portal (3.3) 17 (5.6) 40 (13.1) 177 (57.8) 62 (20.3) Website for all user levels (1.7) 14 (4.7) 42 (14.1) 182 (61.1) 55 (18.5) Accurate pre-populated data (2.7) 30 (10.2) 33 (11.2) 136 (46.3) 87 (29.6) Confident all records updated (1.3) 3 (1) 13 (4.3) 110 (36.2) 174 (57.2) ARO data consistent with self-study (1.3) 4 (1.3) 28 (9.2) 135 (44.4) 133 (43.8) Archives section is accurate (2) 16 (5.4) 65 (22) 147 (49.7) 62 (20.9) Strongest agreement was found for respondent confidence that all ARO records were added or updated before submission and the belief that their ARO data are consistent with their self-study data. Table 5. Usability of Portal site Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree N Website is easy to use (0) 34 (11.4) 42 (14.1) 222 (74.5) 0 (0) Webinars/online tutorials useful (1.1) 10 (5.6) 52 (28.9) 89 (49.4) 26 (14.4) ARO instructions were adequate (1.4) 34 (11.5) 48 (16.2) 165 (55.7) 45 (15.2) Progress bars on ARO dashboard helped (0.7) 16 (5.4) 42 (14.2) 146 (49.3) 90 (30.4) Understood how and when to use "mark as complete" buttons (1.0) 14 (4.8) 37 (12.6) 163 (55.4) 77 (26.2) ARO tip ' was helpful (1.1) 18 (6.5) 77 (27.6) 125 (44.8) 56 (20.1) Site has expected functionality (4.4) 56 (19.0) 70 (23.8) 125 (42.5) 30 (10.2) Time to complete ARO was reasonable (5.7) 31 (10.4) 43 (14.4) 164 (55) 43 (14.4) About eighty percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the progress bars were useful and understood how and when to use the mark as complete button. However, there was notable disagreement that the site had the expected functionality, that the time to complete the ARO was reasonable and that the instructions were adequate. 4
6 Table 6. Performance/Navigation of Portal site Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree N Page load rate was good (9.1) 37 (12.5) 35 (11.8) 152 (51.4) 45 (15.2) Organized/clear info on website (2.4) 23 (7.8) 42 (14.3) 172 (58.7) 49 (16.7) Should auto-sort by last name (3.1) 16 (5.6) 60 (20.9) 105 (36.6) 97 (33.8) *Unsorted columns frustrating (0) 16 (3.3) 60 (34.1) 105 (33) 97 (29.6) *Redirected to first page after update is frustrating (0) 7 (2.5) 72 (26.2) 98 (35.6) 98 (35.6) *Reliability error check did not give solutions (1.9) 23 (8.5) 76 (28.1) 84 (31.1) 82 (30.4) Aware of ARO data Excel download link (3.8) 55 (19) 43 (14.9) 141 (48.8) 39 (13.5) Understand how to submit ARO data (1.0) 6 (2.1) 19 (6.5) 181 (62) 83 (28.4) *Item framed negatively toward expected frustration with system features/functionality Ninety percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they understood the steps required to formally submit ARO data but just over sixty percent agreed that they were aware they could download their ARO data. Twenty percent disagreed that the page load rate was good and ten percent disagreed that information on the website was organized and clear. III. Crosstabulation (Crosstab) Results Due to the low rate of response from faculty respondents, crosstab results by program role were collapsed across faculty (N = 16) and program director (N = 191) categories and resultant frequencies were compared to administrative respondents (N = 124). Differences in responses trended toward statistical significance based on which role or position respondents held in the program. Administrative respondents tended to better understand how to download a spreadsheet of ARO data and agree that the CoA Portal instructions were adequate. Interestingly, there was more of a tendency for more administrative respondents to participate in data entry training than program directors, and to prefer records to be automatically sorted by last name. Project directors were more likely to report they were unable to complete data entry in a reasonable amount of time, and they are less confident their historical ARO data are accurate. 5
7 Table 7. Program role and overall satisfaction with CoA Portal What is your role in the program? Program director/faculty Administration I understand I can download my program's 2012 ARO data I was able to complete data entry in a reasonable amount of time Did you participate in any data entry training? I believe my program's historical ARO data in the archives section is accurate Student/Graduate/Fac ulty profile tables should automatically sort records by last name When working through the ARO, the instructions were adequate Disagree 50 (28.2) 16 (14.3) 66 (22.8) Neutral 30 (16.9) 13 (11.6) 43 (14.9) Agree 97 (54.8) 83 (74.1) 180 (62.3) 177 (61.2) 112 (38.8) 289 (100) Disagree 39 (21.3) 9 (7.8) 48 (16.1) Neutral 22 (12) 21 (18.3) 43 (14.4) Agree 122 (66.7) 85 (73.9) 207 (69.5) 183 (61.4) 115 (38.6) 298 (100) Yes 87 (41.8) 71 (57.7) 158 (47.7) No 121 (58.2) 52 (42.3) 173 (52.3) 208 (62.8) 123 (37.2) 331 (100) Disagree 20 (10.9) 2 (1.8) 22 (7.4) Neutral 35 (19.1) 30 (26.5) 65 (22) Agree 128 (69.9) 81 (71.7) 209 (70.6) 183 (61.8) 113 (38.2) 296 (100) Disagree 17 (9.8) 8 (7) 25 (8.7) Neutral 44 (25.4) 16 (14) 60 (20.9) Agree 112 (64.7) 90 (78.9) 202 (70.4) 173 (60.3) 114 (39.7) 287 (100) Disagree 30 (16.4) 8 (7.1) 38 (12.8) Neutral 31 (16.9) 17 (15) 48 (16.2) Agree 122 (66.7) 88 (77.9) 210 (70.9) 183 (61.8) 113 (38.2) 296 (100) Disagree 10 (10.2) 3 (3.7) 13 (7.2) I found the training Neutral 30 (30.6) 22 (26.8) 52 (28.9) webinars and online tutorials useful Agree 58 (59.2) 57 (69.5) 115 (63.9) 98 (54.4) 82 (45.6) 180 (100) *** p<0.00, ** p<0.05, * p<0.150 X² *** (p=.004) *** (p=0.005) *** (p=.005) *** (p=.008) ** (p=.032) ** (p=.047) (p=.164) 6
8 Table 8. Program role and overall satisfaction with CoA Portal (Continue) Program director/faculty What is your role in the program? Administration X² Overall, I am satisfied with the CoA Portal ARO website...it was frustrating that the system returned to first page of student/ graduate/faculty profile tables... it was frustrating that column sort preferences were not saved when returning to profile tables The data that were pre-populated from previous AROs were accurate Disagree 21 (11.1) 6 (5.2) 27 (8.8) Neutral 24 (12.6) 16 (13.8) 40 (13.1) Agree 145 (76.3) 94 (81) 239 (78.1) 190 (62.1) 116 (37.9) 306 (100) Disagree 3 (1.8) 4 (3.6) 7 2.5) Neutral 48 (29.4) 24 (21.4) ) Agree 112 (68.7) 84 (75) ) 163 (59.3) 112 (40.7) 275 (100) Disagree (2.7) 9 (3.3) Neutral (30) 92 (34.1) Agree (67.3) 169 (62.6) (40.7) 270 (100) Disagree 26 (14.3) 12 (10.7) 38 (12.9) Neutral 21 (11.5) 12 (10.7) 33 (11.2) Agree 135 (74.2) 88 (78.6) 223 (75.9) (p=.212) (p=.249) (p=.415).903 (p=.637) 182 (61.9) 112 (38.1) 294 (100) *** p<0.00, ** p<0.05, * p<
9 Table 9. Data entry training and overall satisfaction with CoA Portal Did you participate in any data entry training? Yes No Overall, the website is easy to use Overall, I am satisfied with the CoA Portal ARO website The rate at which pages loaded was fast enough Disagree 9 (6) 25 (16.8) 34 (11.4) Neutral 24 (16.1) 18 (12.1) 42 (14.1) Agree 116 (77.9) 106 (71.1) 222 (74.5) 149 (50) 149 (50) 298 (100) Disagree 7 (4.6) 20 (12.9) 27 (8.8) Neutral 21 ( (12.3) 40 (13.1) Agree 123 (81.5) 116 (74.8) 239 (78.1) 151 (49.3) 155 (50.7) 306 (100) Disagree 31 (20.9) 33 (22.3) 64 (21.6) Neutral 11 (7.4) 24 (16.2) 35 (11.8) Agree 106 (71.6) 91 (61.5) 197 (66.6) 148 (50) 148 (50) 296 (100) Disagree 5 (3.5) 14 (9.1) 19 (6.4) The website was Neutral 22 (15.3) 20 (13) 42 (14.1) designed for all levels of users Agree 117 (81.3) 120 (77.9) 237 (79.5) 144 (48.3) 154 (51.7) 298 (100) *** p<0.00, ** p<0.05, * p<0.150 X² (p = 0.012) ** (p = 0.039) ** (p = 0.04) ** (p = 0.131) * Table 10. Data entry role and overall satisfaction with CoA Portal Role in data entry I believe my program's historical ARO data in the Archives section is accurate The organization of information on the website is clear The rate at which pages loaded was fast enough All/Most Half/Some/ A little/none Disagree 15 (6.1) 7 (13.5) 22 (7.4) Neutral 50 (20.5) 15 (28.8) 65 (22) Agree 179 (73.4) 30 (57.7) 22 (70.6) 244 (82.4) 52 (17.6) 296 (100) Disagree 25 (10.2) 5 (10.4) 30 (10.2) Neutral 40 (13.7) 2 (0.7) 42 (14.3) Agree 180 (61.4) 41 (14) 221 (75.4) 245 (83.6) 48 (16.4) 293 (100) Disagree 52 (20.9) 12 (25.5) 64 (21.6) Neutral 26 (10.4) 9 (19.1) 35 (11.8) Agree 171 (68.7) 26 (55.3) 197 (66.6) 249 (84.1) 47 (15.9) 296 (100) X² (p = 0.051) * (p = 0.086) * 3.90 (p = 0.136) * 8
10 *** p<0.00, ** p<0.05, * p<0.150 Table 11. Overall satisfaction with CoA Portal and website speed Overall, I am satisfied with the CoA Portal ARO website Disagree Neutral Agree Disagree 16 (61.5) 12 (32.4) 36 (15.5) 64 (21.7) The rate at which pages loaded was Neutral 3 (11.5) 5 (13.5) 26 (11.2) 34 (11.5) fast enough Agree 7 (26.9) 20 (54.1) 170 (73.3) 197 (66.8) 26 (8.8) 37 (12.5) 232 (78.6) 295 (100) *** p<0.00, ** p<0.05, * p<0.150 X² (p 0.000) *** Table 12. Website designed for all user levels and website is easy to use The website was designed for all levels of users Disagree Neutral Agree Disagree 14 (73.7) 8 (20) 12 (5.2) 34 (11.7) Neutral 3 (15.8) 14 (35) 24 (10.4) 41 (14.1) Overall, the website is easy to Agree 2 (10.5) 18 (45) 195 (84.4) 231 (74.1) use 19 (6.6) 40 (13.8) 231 (79.7) 290 (100) *** p<0.00, ** p<0.05, * p<0.150 X² (p 0.000) *** 9
11 Discussion The 2012 ARO CoA Portal survey identified problem areas as well as satisfactory areas in the CoA Portal. In general, survey respondents were satisfied with the new CoA Portal platform and agreed that the website was designed for all levels of users. Respondents expressed dissatisfaction in areas of adequacy of ARO instructions, expected functionality of the site, and the page load rate. Also, there was overall agreement that it was frustrating that the site redirected users to the first page of the student, graduate or faculty list after updates to an individual profile, column sort preferences weren t saved for the profile tables, and solutions to reliability check errors weren t provided. The CoA Portal is a data collection system used for accreditation purposes and it is important that the data collected is accurate. Ultimately, ARO data in the Portal will be used to populate program self-study tables. It is important to note that most respondents could agree that ARO data for previous years was imported into the new database accurately [76% agreed; 13% disagreed]. Also, ninety percent of respondents agreed that their program updated and/or added records during the 2012 ARO and that their data was consistent with self-study data. However, just seventy percent agreed that they thought their archived ARO data was accurate. Considering that some ARO data points will be used to populate self-study tables in the future, it would be very useful if programs could make corrections/updates to historical ARO data. For follow-up analysis, practical logic helped guide explorative analyses. Statistically significant correlations could be elucidated for some items. Some of the interesting trends found were participation in data entry training seemed to facilitate easier website use, the feeling that the website was designed for all levels of users, positive perception of page loading speed on the website, and an overall satisfaction with the CoA Portal. Also, respondent role in program moderated outcomes on several items. Administrative respondents tended to understand how to download a spreadsheet of ARO data than faculty/program director respondents and administrative respondents tended to agree that the CoA Portal instructions were adequate more than faculty/program director respondents. Interestingly, in connection with the previously mentioned outcomes, administrative respondents tended to participate in data entry training at a higher rate than faculty/program director respondents. There were limiting factors to consider in implementing this survey. The poor response rate to the survey and lack of a validating process for survey items impaired the ability to interpret the summarized results with any depth. Also, the methodology in implementing the survey did not take measures to ensure a representative sample of registered Portal users participated in the survey. Consequently, broad statements about the utility and functionality of the CoA Portal as it relates to APA accredited programs as a whole can t be made using these survey results alone. The implications of these results are that the CoA Portal is a tool that has improved and will further improve the method of data collection for APA accreditation purposes, particularly for the ARO. The fact that administrative staff for programs are typically in contact with OPCA staff and more readily available than program directors may mean that, in general, program directors knowledge about the ARO and CoA Portal site were significantly different than administrative staff. Hence, program role in some cases moderate how respondents agreed or disagreed with survey items (Table 7). An important follow-up question is how OPCA staff might tailor ARO outreach and resources to program directors versus administrative staff. Finally, these results indicate that there may be some benefit for users to participate in data entry training prior to entering data for the ARO. 10
12 There are limitations in the current system that weren t outlined in this survey format that have caused problems for some programs, such as the inability to enter student/trainee (or faculty/supervisor) start and left dates that are outside the reporting year, and the confusion regarding faculty/supervisor classification definitions. Related, programs are also seeking guidance regarding ARO data requirements for faculty/supervisors classified as Other Contributors. Also, because ARO data is collected and organized based on a calendar academic/training year, the ARO system must use rigid business rules to deal with data, therefore flexibility is compromised when handling start and left dates. Consequently, situations arise where certain ARO data may appear incompatible with self-study data. These challenges will be prioritized and solved as viable, long-term solutions become available. At last, this survey was done as an explorative effort and used as a medium for programs to express their opinion about the CoA Portal and to support future decision-making processes regarding changes to the CoA Portal. The goal of the CoA moving forward is to provide programs with the support that is needed to successfully submit required annual program ARO data, to work with the current vendor to reduce the number of obstacles to entering and submitting data efficiently and timely, and to reduce confusion about which data are required. This year the CoA and OPCA is offering 4 webinars for data entry training and the ARO will not close on a weekend, as it did last year, when office staff are not available. Several new features have been added to the CoA Portal so that it s more convenient and easier to navigate, such as not losing column sort preferences after navigating back to the profile table and saving the page location when there are multiple pages of profile tables after navigating back from updating an individual profile. Throughout the Portal more detailed instructions are available to help users understand the process involved in data entry including more detailed instruction for the reliability check feature used in the ARO to check for consistency in data entry. Also, to facilitate accurate ARO data population of self-study tables, the Commission has approved opening the Archives section of the ARO so that programs can update student and faculty records. 11
13 Appendix A. Survey Items Respondent information 1 Respondent role in program Program Director; Faculty; Administrative 2 Number of accredited programs for which you complete the ARO 1; 2; 3 3 Type of program(s) Doctoral; Internship; Postdoctoral; select all 4 Participation in pre- or post-launch training Yes/No 5 Respondent role in data entry Entered all data; most; half; some; a little; none 6 Typical browser used IE6; IE7; IE8; IE9: IE10; Firefox; Chrome; Safari; Other; Unknown Likert Scale Items: 1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly agree Overall Domain: 7 Overall I am satisfied with the CoA Portal ARO website 8 The website was designed for all levels of users 9 The data that were pre-populated from previous AROs were accurate 10 I am confident that my program added or updated all records before submitting 2012 ARO 11 I believe my program's ARO data is consistent with data in our self-study tables 12 I believe my program's historical ARO data in the Archives section is accurate Usability Domain: 13 Overall, the website is easy to use 14 I found the training webinars and online tutorials to be useful 15 When working through the ARO, the instructions were adequate 16 The progress bars on the ARO dashboard were helpful for completing the ARO 17 I understood how and when to use the Mark as complete buttons 18 The ARO reminders were helpful 12
14 19 The website has all the functions and capabilities I expect it to have 20 I was able to complete data entry in a reasonable amount of time Performance/Navigation Domain: 21 The rate at which pages loaded was fast enough 22 The organization of information on the website is clear 23 Student/Graduate/Faculty profile tables should automatically sort records by last name 24 After updating a record, it was frustrating that column sort preferences were not saved when returning to Student/Graduate/Faculty profile tables 25 After updating a record not located on the first page, it was frustrating that the system returned to the first page of Student/Graduate/Faculty profile tables 26 The reliability check table was frustrating because error messages did not tell me how to fix the problems 27 I understand I can download my program's 2012 ARO data by clicking on the Excel link on the Submit page (both during the 2012 open window and now) 28 I understood the steps required to formally submit my program's ARO Multiple option: 29 Which month should the ARO window open? (ARO Window) April, May, June 30 Which month should the ARO window close? (ARO Window) August, September 13
Experience College- and Career-Ready Assessment User Guide
Experience College- and Career-Ready Assessment User Guide 2014-2015 Introduction Welcome to Experience College- and Career-Ready Assessment, or Experience CCRA. Experience CCRA is a series of practice
More informationMOODLE 2.0 GLOSSARY TUTORIALS
BEGINNING TUTORIALS SECTION 1 TUTORIAL OVERVIEW MOODLE 2.0 GLOSSARY TUTORIALS The glossary activity module enables participants to create and maintain a list of definitions, like a dictionary, or to collect
More informationPowerTeacher Gradebook User Guide PowerSchool Student Information System
PowerSchool Student Information System Document Properties Copyright Owner Copyright 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This document is the property of Pearson Education,
More informationUsing Blackboard.com Software to Reach Beyond the Classroom: Intermediate
Using Blackboard.com Software to Reach Beyond the Classroom: Intermediate NESA Conference 2007 Presenter: Barbara Dent Educational Technology Training Specialist Thomas Jefferson High School for Science
More informationField Experience Management 2011 Training Guides
Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides Page 1 of 40 Contents Introduction... 3 Helpful Resources Available on the LiveText Conference Visitors Pass... 3 Overview... 5 Development Model for FEM...
More informationMoodle 2 Assignments. LATTC Faculty Technology Training Tutorial
LATTC Faculty Technology Training Tutorial Moodle 2 Assignments This tutorial begins with the instructor already logged into Moodle 2. http://moodle.lattc.edu/ Faculty login id is same as email login id.
More informationThe Revised Math TEKS (Grades 9-12) with Supporting Documents
The Revised Math TEKS (Grades 9-12) with Supporting Documents This is the first of four modules to introduce the revised TEKS for high school mathematics. The goals for participation are to become familiar
More informationGetting Started Guide
Getting Started Guide Getting Started with Voki Classroom Oddcast, Inc. Published: July 2011 Contents: I. Registering for Voki Classroom II. Upgrading to Voki Classroom III. Getting Started with Voki Classroom
More informationOutreach Connect User Manual
Outreach Connect A Product of CAA Software, Inc. Outreach Connect User Manual Church Growth Strategies Through Sunday School, Care Groups, & Outreach Involving Members, Guests, & Prospects PREPARED FOR:
More informationWelcome to California Colleges, Platform Exploration (6.1) Goal: Students will familiarize themselves with the CaliforniaColleges.edu platform.
Welcome to California Colleges, Platform Exploration (6.1) Goal: Students will familiarize themselves with the CaliforniaColleges.edu platform. Lesson Time Options This lesson requires one 45-60 minute
More informationecampus Basics Overview
ecampus Basics Overview 2016/2017 Table of Contents Managing DCCCD Accounts.... 2 DCCCD Resources... 2 econnect and ecampus... 2 Registration through econnect... 3 Fill out the form (3 steps)... 4 ecampus
More informationAdult Degree Program. MyWPclasses (Moodle) Guide
Adult Degree Program MyWPclasses (Moodle) Guide Table of Contents Section I: What is Moodle?... 3 The Basics... 3 The Moodle Dashboard... 4 Navigation Drawer... 5 Course Administration... 5 Activity and
More informationIntroduction to the Revised Mathematics TEKS (2012) Module 1
Introduction to the Revised Mathematics TEKS (2012) Module 1 This is the first of four modules to introduce the Revised TEKS for grades K 8. The goals for participation are to become familiar with the
More informationAn Introductory Blackboard (elearn) Guide For Parents
An Introductory Blackboard (elearn) Guide For Parents Prepared: July 2010 Revised: Jan 2013 By M. A. Avila Introduction: Blackboard is a course management system widely used in educational settings. At
More informationStudent User s Guide to the Project Integration Management Simulation. Based on the PMBOK Guide - 5 th edition
Student User s Guide to the Project Integration Management Simulation Based on the PMBOK Guide - 5 th edition TABLE OF CONTENTS Goal... 2 Accessing the Simulation... 2 Creating Your Double Masters User
More informationOPAC and User Perception in Law University Libraries in the Karnataka: A Study
ISSN 2229-5984 (P) 29-5576 (e) OPAC and User Perception in Law University Libraries in the Karnataka: A Study Devendra* and Khaiser Nikam** To Cite: Devendra & Nikam, K. (20). OPAC and user perception
More informationUsing SAM Central With iread
Using SAM Central With iread January 1, 2016 For use with iread version 1.2 or later, SAM Central, and Student Achievement Manager version 2.4 or later PDF0868 (PDF) Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing
More informationIntroduction to WeBWorK for Students
Introduction to WeBWorK 1 Introduction to WeBWorK for Students I. What is WeBWorK? WeBWorK is a system developed at the University of Rochester that allows professors to put homework problems on the web
More informationNational Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results
Introduction The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) is administered by hundreds of colleges and universities every year (560 in 2016), and is designed to measure the amount of time and effort
More informationCreating an Online Test. **This document was revised for the use of Plano ISD teachers and staff.
Creating an Online Test **This document was revised for the use of Plano ISD teachers and staff. OVERVIEW Step 1: Step 2: Step 3: Use ExamView Test Manager to set up a class Create class Add students to
More informationTIPS PORTAL TRAINING DOCUMENTATION
TIPS PORTAL TRAINING DOCUMENTATION 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS General Overview of TIPS. 3, 4 TIPS, Where is it? How do I access it?... 5, 6 Grade Reports.. 7 Grade Reports Demo and Exercise 8 12 Withdrawal Reports.
More informationFAU Mobile App Goes Live
Back to School August 2011 IRM Newsletter Technology News for FAU Faculty and Students Summer at IRM Has Been Anything But Quiet! Whether you are new to FAU or returning to campus after a relaxing summer,
More informationIntroduction to Questionnaire Design
Introduction to Questionnaire Design Why this seminar is necessary! Bad questions are everywhere! Don t let them happen to you! Fall 2012 Seminar Series University of Illinois www.srl.uic.edu The first
More informationSchoology Getting Started Guide for Teachers
Schoology Getting Started Guide for Teachers (Latest Revision: December 2014) Before you start, please go over the Beginner s Guide to Using Schoology. The guide will show you in detail how to accomplish
More informationTexas A&M University - Central Texas PSYK PRINCIPLES OF RESEARCH FOR THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES. Professor: Elizabeth K.
Texas A&M University - Central Texas PSYK 335-120 PRINCIPLES OF RESEARCH FOR THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Professor: Elizabeth K. Brown, MS, MBA Class Times: T/Th 6:30pm-7:45pm Phone: 254-338-6058 Location:
More informationEdX Learner s Guide. Release
EdX Learner s Guide Release Nov 18, 2017 Contents 1 Welcome! 1 1.1 Learning in a MOOC........................................... 1 1.2 If You Have Questions As You Take a Course..............................
More informationFACULTY Tk20 TUTORIALS: PORTFOLIOS & FIELD EXPERIENCE BINDERS
FACULTY Tk20 TUTORIALS: PORTFOLIOS & FIELD EXPERIENCE BINDERS TABLE OF CONTENTS TOPIC PAGE PORTFOLIOS 2 Introduction 2 Student View 2 Faculty Administrator View 3 Accessing eportfolios from personal Faculty
More information2 User Guide of Blackboard Mobile Learn for CityU Students (Android) How to download / install Bb Mobile Learn? Downloaded from Google Play Store
2 User Guide of Blackboard Mobile Learn for CityU Students (Android) Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 How to download / install Bb Mobile Learn? Downloaded from Google Play Store How to access e Portal via
More informationMoodle Student User Guide
Moodle Student User Guide Moodle Student User Guide... 1 Aims and Objectives... 2 Aim... 2 Student Guide Introduction... 2 Entering the Moodle from the website... 2 Entering the course... 3 In the course...
More informationStudent Handbook. This handbook was written for the students and participants of the MPI Training Site.
Student Handbook This handbook was written for the students and participants of the MPI Training Site. Purpose To enable the active participants of this website easier operation and a thorough understanding
More informationCommittee to explore issues related to accreditation of professional doctorates in social work
Committee to explore issues related to accreditation of professional doctorates in social work October 2015 Report for CSWE Board of Directors Overview Informed by the various reports dedicated to the
More informationInstructor: Mario D. Garrett, Ph.D. Phone: Office: Hepner Hall (HH) 100
San Diego State University School of Social Work 610 COMPUTER APPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Office: Hepner Hall (HH) 100 Instructor: Mario D. Garrett,
More informationSTUDENT MOODLE ORIENTATION
BAKER UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL AND GRADUATE STUDIES STUDENT MOODLE ORIENTATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to Moodle... 2 Online Aptitude Assessment... 2 Moodle Icons... 6 Logging In... 8 Page
More informationRETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE TRANSCRIPT
RETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE Slide 1. The Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessments are designed to measure what students with significant cognitive disabilities know and can do in relation
More informationLMS - LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM END USER GUIDE
LMS - LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ADP TALENT MANAGEMENT) END USER GUIDE August 2012 Login Log onto the Learning Management System (LMS) by clicking on the desktop icon or using the following URL: https://lakehealth.csod.com
More information1 Instructional Design Website: Making instruction easy for HCPS Teachers Henrico County, Virginia
1 Instructional Design Website: Making instruction easy for HCPS Teachers Short Overview The teachers of Henrico County Public Schools had many resources available to them but the resources were scattered
More information(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman
Report #202-1/01 Using Item Correlation With Global Satisfaction Within Academic Division to Reduce Questionnaire Length and to Raise the Value of Results An Analysis of Results from the 1996 UC Survey
More informationWP 2: Project Quality Assurance. Quality Manual
Ask Dad and/or Mum Parents as Key Facilitators: an Inclusive Approach to Sexual and Relationship Education on the Home Environment WP 2: Project Quality Assurance Quality Manual Country: Denmark Author:
More informationINSTRUCTOR USER MANUAL/HELP SECTION
Criterion INSTRUCTOR USER MANUAL/HELP SECTION ngcriterion Criterion Online Writing Evaluation June 2013 Chrystal Anderson REVISED SEPTEMBER 2014 ANNA LITZ Criterion User Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...3
More informationSpeak Up 2012 Grades 9 12
2012 Speak Up Survey District: WAYLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS Speak Up 2012 Grades 9 12 Results based on 130 survey(s). Note: Survey responses are based upon the number of individuals that responded to the specific
More informationNCAA Eligibility Center High School Portal Instructions. Course Module
NCAA Eligibility Center High School Portal Instructions Course Module www.eligibilitycenter.org Click here to enter the High School Portal Before logging in, you can peruse the resource page or look at
More informationE-learning Strategies to Support Databases Courses: a Case Study
E-learning Strategies to Support Databases Courses: a Case Study Luisa M. Regueras 1, Elena Verdú 1, María J. Verdú 1, María Á. Pérez 1, and Juan P. de Castro 1 1 University of Valladolid, School of Telecommunications
More informationAppendix L: Online Testing Highlights and Script
Online Testing Highlights and Script for Fall 2017 Ohio s State Tests Administrations Test administrators must use this document when administering Ohio s State Tests online. It includes step-by-step directions,
More informationThe Moodle and joule 2 Teacher Toolkit
The Moodle and joule 2 Teacher Toolkit Moodlerooms Learning Solutions The design and development of Moodle and joule continues to be guided by social constructionist pedagogy. This refers to the idea that
More informationThe AAMC Standardized Video Interview: Essentials for the ERAS 2018 Season
The AAMC Standardized Video Interview: Essentials for the ERAS 2018 Season The AAMC Standardized Video Interview: Essentials for the ERAS 2018 Season Association of American Medical Colleges Washington,
More informationNATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) 2008 H. Craig Petersen Director, Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation Utah State University Logan, Utah AUGUST, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...1
More informationFaculty Feedback User s Guide
Faculty Feedback User s Guide Contents Description:... 2 Purpose:... 2 Instructions:... 2 Step 1. Logging in.... 2 Step 2. Selecting a course... 3 Step 3. Interacting with the feedback roster.... 3 Faculty
More informationPreferences...3 Basic Calculator...5 Math/Graphing Tools...5 Help...6 Run System Check...6 Sign Out...8
CONTENTS GETTING STARTED.................................... 1 SYSTEM SETUP FOR CENGAGENOW....................... 2 USING THE HEADER LINKS.............................. 2 Preferences....................................................3
More informationParent s Guide to the Student/Parent Portal
Nova Scotia Public Education System Parent s Guide to the Student/Parent Portal Revision Date: The Student/Parent Portal is your gateway into the classroom of the children associated to your account. The
More informationMunicipal Accounting Systems, Inc. Wen-GAGE Gradebook FAQs
Municipal Accounting Systems, Inc. Wen-GAGE Gradebook FAQs Administration Question: If the administration office changes a grade for a student through the Wen-GAGE SI System, after it has been calculated
More informationSTUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING
1 STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING Presentation to STLE Grantees: December 20, 2013 Information Recorded on: December 26, 2013 Please
More informationmyperspectives 2017 Click Path to Success myperspectives 2017 Virtual Activation Click Path
myperspectives 2017 Click Path to Success Click Path Overview Sign in to PearsonRealize.com. Click Sign In. Click to Discover Note that you can also use helpful resources on the PearsonRealize.com home
More informationStandards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS
Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS World Headquarters 11520 West 119th Street Overland Park, KS 66213 USA USA Belgium Perú acbsp.org info@acbsp.org
More informationGED Manager. Training Guide For Corrections Version 1.0 December 2013
GED Manager Training Guide For Corrections Version 1.0 December 2013 GED is a registered trademark of the American Council on Education. Used under license. Table of Contents Introduction to GED Manager
More informationBest Practices in Internet Ministry Released November 7, 2008
Best Practices in Internet Ministry Released November 7, 2008 David T. Bourgeois, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Information Systems Crowell School of Business Biola University Best Practices in Internet
More informationBest Colleges Main Survey
Best Colleges Main Survey Date submitted 5/12/216 18::56 Introduction page 1 / 146 BEST COLLEGES Data Collection U.S. News has begun collecting data for the 217 edition of Best Colleges. The U.S. News
More informationGraduate Program in Education
SPECIAL EDUCATION THESIS/PROJECT AND SEMINAR (EDME 531-01) SPRING / 2015 Professor: Janet DeRosa, D.Ed. Course Dates: January 11 to May 9, 2015 Phone: 717-258-5389 (home) Office hours: Tuesday evenings
More informationA Study of Metacognitive Awareness of Non-English Majors in L2 Listening
ISSN 1798-4769 Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 504-510, May 2013 Manufactured in Finland. doi:10.4304/jltr.4.3.504-510 A Study of Metacognitive Awareness of Non-English Majors
More informationMSE 5301, Interagency Disaster Management Course Syllabus. Course Description. Prerequisites. Course Textbook. Course Learning Objectives
MSE 5301, Interagency Disaster Management Course Syllabus Course Description Focuses on interagency cooperation for complex crises and domestic emergencies. Reviews the coordinating mechanisms and planning
More informationUSE OF ONLINE PUBLIC ACCESS CATALOGUE IN GURU NANAK DEV UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, AMRITSAR: A STUDY
USE OF ONLINE PUBLIC ACCESS CATALOGUE IN GURU NANAK DEV UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, AMRITSAR: A STUDY Shiv Kumar* and Ranjana Vohra+ The aim of the present study is to investigate the use of Online Public Access
More informationYour School and You. Guide for Administrators
Your School and You Guide for Administrators Table of Content SCHOOLSPEAK CONCEPTS AND BUILDING BLOCKS... 1 SchoolSpeak Building Blocks... 3 ACCOUNT... 4 ADMIN... 5 MANAGING SCHOOLSPEAK ACCOUNT ADMINISTRATORS...
More informationContract Renewal, Tenure, and Promotion a Web Based Faculty Resource
Contract Renewal, Tenure, and Promotion a Web Based Faculty Resource Kristi Kaniho Department of Educational Technology University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii, USA kanihok@hawaii.edu Abstract:
More informationSECTION 12 E-Learning (CBT) Delivery Module
SECTION 12 E-Learning (CBT) Delivery Module Linking a CBT package (file or URL) to an item of Set Training 2 Linking an active Redkite Question Master assessment 2 to the end of a CBT package Removing
More informationASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE
ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE March 28, 2002 Prepared by the Writing Intensive General Education Category Course Instructor Group Table of Contents Section Page
More informationCompleting the Pre-Assessment Activity for TSI Testing (designed by Maria Martinez- CARE Coordinator)
Completing the Pre-Assessment Activity for TSI Testing (designed by Maria Martinez- CARE Coordinator) Texas law requires students to complete the Texas Success Initiative Assessment or TSI for college
More informationQuick Start Guide 7.0
www.skillsoft.com Quick Start Guide 7.0 Copyright 2010 SkillSoft Corporation. All rights reserved SkillSoft Corporation 107 Northeastern Blvd. Nashua, NH 03062 603-324-3000 87-SkillSoft (877-545-5763)
More informationACCOUNTING FOR MANAGERS BU-5190-OL Syllabus
MASTER IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION ACCOUNTING FOR MANAGERS BU-5190-OL Syllabus Fall 2011 P LYMOUTH S TATE U NIVERSITY, C OLLEGE OF B USINESS A DMINISTRATION 1 Page 2 PLYMOUTH STATE UNIVERSITY College of
More informationA BEGINNERS GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL ONLINE SURVEYS
A BEGINNERS GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL ONLINE SURVEYS EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW TO CONDUCT CUSTOMER AND EMPLOYEE SURVEYS THAT GROW YOUR BUSINESS 1 CONTENTS PLANNING 3 Planning 3 Respondents 4 THE SURVEY 6 Visual
More informationIntroduction to Moodle
Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning Mr. Philip Daoud Introduction to Moodle Beginner s guide Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning / Teaching Resource This manual is part of a serious
More informationFrequently Asked Questions About OSSI:NIFS for Student Applicants
Frequently Asked Questions About OSSI:NIFS for Student Applicants The OSSI Frequently Asked Questions link is https://intern.nasa.gov/ossi/web/faq/index.cfm?subaction=view What does OSSI:NIFS stand for?
More informationPREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE
PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE ARC-PA Suzanne York SuzanneYork@arc-pa.org 2016 PAEA Education Forum Minneapolis, MN Saturday, October 15, 2016 TODAY S SESSION WILL INCLUDE: Recommendations
More informationGreek Teachers Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs
American Journal of Educational Research, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 4, 208-218 Available online at http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/2/4/6 Science and Education Publishing DOI:10.12691/education-2-4-6 Greek Teachers
More informationDoctoral Student Experience (DSE) Student Handbook. Version January Northcentral University
Doctoral Student Experience (DSE) Student Handbook Version January 2017 Northcentral University 1 Table of Contents Contents Doctoral Student Experience (DSE) Student Handbook... 1 Table of Contents...
More informationChamilo 2.0: A Second Generation Open Source E-learning and Collaboration Platform
Chamilo 2.0: A Second Generation Open Source E-learning and Collaboration Platform doi:10.3991/ijac.v3i3.1364 Jean-Marie Maes University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium Abstract Dokeos used to be one of
More informationBlackboard Communication Tools
Blackboard Communication Tools Donna M. Dickinson E-Learning Center Borough of Manhattan Community College Workshop Overview Email from Communication Area and directly from the Grade Center Using Blackboard
More informationOffice of Planning and Budgets. Provost Market for Fiscal Year Resource Guide
Office of Planning and Budgets Provost Market for Fiscal Year 2017-18 Resource Guide This resource guide will show users how to operate the Cognos Planning application used to collect Provost Market raise
More informationNaviance / Family Connection
Naviance / Family Connection Welcome to Naviance/Family Connection, the program Lake Central utilizes for students applying to college. This guide will teach you how to use Naviance as a tool in the college
More informationHigher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual
ELMP 8981 & ELMP 8982 Administrative Internship Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual College of Education & Human Services Department of Education Leadership, Management & Policy Table
More informationHow to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test
How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test Technical Bulletin #6 Evaluation and Examination Service The University of Iowa (319) 335-0356 HOW TO JUDGE THE QUALITY OF AN OBJECTIVE CLASSROOM
More informationSchool Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide
SPECIAL EDUCATION School Year 2017/18 DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION Training Guide Revision: July, 2017 Table of Contents DDS Student Application Key Concepts and Understanding... 3 Access to
More informationPrincipal Survey FAQs
Principal Survey FAQs Question: When will principals receive the Principal Survey? Answer: The surveys will be available in the principals TEA educator profiles on April 9, 2012. When principals access
More informationWe re Listening Results Dashboard How To Guide
We re Listening Results Dashboard How To Guide Contents Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Finding your way around 3 3. Dashboard Options 3 4. Landing Page Dashboard 4 5. Question Breakdown Dashboard 5 6. Key Drivers
More informationNATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT 2010 Benchmark Comparisons Report OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH & PLANNING To focus discussions about the importance of student engagement and to guide institutional
More informationCHANCERY SMS 5.0 STUDENT SCHEDULING
CHANCERY SMS 5.0 STUDENT SCHEDULING PARTICIPANT WORKBOOK VERSION: 06/04 CSL - 12148 Student Scheduling Chancery SMS 5.0 : Student Scheduling... 1 Course Objectives... 1 Course Agenda... 1 Topic 1: Overview
More informationBeginning Blackboard. Getting Started. The Control Panel. 1. Accessing Blackboard:
Beginning Blackboard Contact Information Blackboard System Administrator: Paul Edminster, Webmaster Developer x3842 or Edminster@its.gonzaga.edu Blackboard Training and Support: Erik Blackerby x3856 or
More informationMotivation to e-learn within organizational settings: What is it and how could it be measured?
Motivation to e-learn within organizational settings: What is it and how could it be measured? Maria Alexandra Rentroia-Bonito and Joaquim Armando Pires Jorge Departamento de Engenharia Informática Instituto
More informationSpring 2015 Achievement Grades 3 to 8 Social Studies and End of Course U.S. History Parent/Teacher Guide to Online Field Test Electronic Practice
Spring 2015 Achievement Grades 3 to 8 Social Studies and End of Course U.S. History Parent/Teacher Guide to Online Field Test Electronic Practice Assessment Tests (epats) FAQs, Instructions, and Hardware
More informationQuick Reference for itslearning
Quick Reference for itslearning Frequently Asked Questions... 2 How do I access itslearning?... 2 Who can I contact if I get a problem?... 2 Where can I get help?... 2 Can I get itslearning in my language?...
More informationIllinois Assessment Update. Illinois State Board of Education July 07, 2017
Illinois Assessment Update Illinois State Board of Education July 07, 2017 PARCC 2018 Test Administration Window March 5, 2018 to April 20, 2018 2 2016-17 PARCC (Partnership for Assessment of Readiness
More informationSkillPort Quick Start Guide 7.0
SkillPort Quick Start Guide 7.0 www.skillsoft.com Copyright 2009 SkillSoft Corporation. All rights reserved SkillSoft Corporation 107 Northeastern Blvd. Nashua, NH 03062 603-324-3000 87-SkillSoft (877-545-5763)
More informationCase study Norway case 1
Case study Norway case 1 School : B (primary school) Theme: Science microorganisms Dates of lessons: March 26-27 th 2015 Age of students: 10-11 (grade 5) Data sources: Pre- and post-interview with 1 teacher
More informationNational Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary
National Survey of Student Engagement Spring 2010 University of Kansas Executive Summary Overview One thousand six hundred and twenty-one (1,621) students from the University of Kansas completed the web-based
More informationEDCI 699 Statistics: Content, Process, Application COURSE SYLLABUS: SPRING 2016
EDCI 699 Statistics: Content, Process, Application COURSE SYLLABUS: SPRING 2016 Instructor: Dr. Katy Denson, Ph.D. Office Hours: Because I live in Albuquerque, New Mexico, I won t have office hours. But
More informationE LEARNING TOOLS IN DISTANCE AND STATIONARY EDUCATION
E LEARNING TOOLS IN DISTANCE AND STATIONARY EDUCATION Michał Krupski 1, Andrzej Cader 2 1 Institute for Distance Education Research, Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz, Poland michalk@wshe.lodz.pl
More informationREAD 180 Next Generation Software Manual
READ 180 Next Generation Software Manual including ereads For use with READ 180 Next Generation version 2.3 and Scholastic Achievement Manager version 2.3 or higher Copyright 2014 by Scholastic Inc. All
More informationPRD Online
1 PRD Online 2011-12 SBC PRD Online What is it? PRD Online, part of CPD Online, will keep track of the PRD process for you, allowing you to concentrate on the quality of the professional dialogue. What
More informationEDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October
More informationTotalLMS. Getting Started with SumTotal: Learner Mode
TotalLMS Getting Started with SumTotal: Learner Mode Contents Learner Mode... 1 TotalLMS... 1 Introduction... 3 Objectives of this Guide... 3 TotalLMS Overview... 3 Logging on to SumTotal... 3 Exploring
More informationPSY 1010, General Psychology Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course etextbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.
Course Syllabus Course Description This course is an introductory survey of the principles, theories, and methods of psychology as a basis for the understanding of human behavior and mental processes.
More informationCurriculum Assessment Employing the Continuous Quality Improvement Model in Post-Certification Graduate Athletic Training Education Programs
Curriculum Assessment Employing the Continuous Quality Improvement Model in Post-Certification Graduate Athletic Training Education Programs Jennifer C. Teeters, Michelle A. Cleary, Jennifer L. Doherty-Restrepo,
More information