SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
|
|
- Clifton Weaver
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A Charter PUBLIC SCHOOL SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School 2665 Clarendon Ave., Huntington Park, CA (323) (323) fax prepatec.org
2 PTLAMS SCHOOL CHARACTERISTICS Executive Director: Superintendent: Principal: School Address: Xavier Reyes Barry Baxter Raymond J. Schmidt 6005 Stafford Ave. (Grade 6) Huntington Park, CA (323) and / or 2665 Clarendon Ave. (Grades 7 8) Huntington Park, CA (323) and / or 2410 Broadway Ave. Walnut Park, CA (323) All school characteristics, including the Vision / Mission, student demographic information, description of the school community, teacher information, parental involvement opportunities, school facilities status, etc., are / will be contained in the School Accountability Report Card (SARC). The SARC is an appendix of the school plan. It can be accessed and viewed on- line at: 1
3 Description and Demographic Narrative Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School is a charter school located in Huntington Park, California. The school completed its first year of operation in and is fed by its relative IB PYP School, Academia Moderna Charter School. Entering the school year, Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School had 5 full classes of Grade 6, 3 full classes of Grade 7, and 3 full classes of Grade 8 with a total of about students. The school year consists of 6 full classes of Grade 6, 5 full classes of Grade 7, and 4 full classes of Grade 8 with a total of about students. The school year will see the total of 6 full classes of Grades 6 8 with a total of about students. The small school setting appeals to many families in our community. Parent participation in the classroom is always welcomed and encouraged. Parents have expressed a feeling of belonging at our school and feel that our school provides their children with a better education than traditional public schools. PTLAMS s vision is to create a center for higher learning in Southeast Los Angeles where students and families learn to exceed expectations, to be self-aware and aware of others, to be responsible, inquisitive, prepared, passionate, inspired, engaged, and independent. Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School applies the International Baccalaureate Middle Years Program tools and processes to be a school where partnerships for continuous improvement amongst students, teachers, parents, and the community are authentic and seek to prepare each student from Grade 6 8 for the challenges of the 21st century. PTLAMS is a model school of life-long learning through the International Baccalaureate Middle Years Program (IB MYP) in the United States. We create a dynamic environment where all staff cultivate, model, nurture, and promote our organizational values of real-world learning and application, servant leadership, inclusiveness, discovery, continuous improvement and accountability. Huntington Park is a city that is predominately Latino / Hispanic at 94% as compared to the California average of 37%, according to the 2013 Census. Other large ethnic or racial groups include Whites at 4.5% and Asians at approximately 1% with a smaller mix of other ethnic or racial groups. It is also a very young community with the largest demographic age group being 18 years old and under. This group comprises 32% of the total population as compared to the rest of California at 25%. Nearly half of our students' parents are classified as being in poverty and have very little educational attainment. The largest percentage of our parents at 36%, have a less than 9 th grade education, as compared to the California average of 11%. The school has a number of ties to the community including an evolving Parent Teacher Organization, a monthly Coffee With The Principal session, and regular community outreach events. The student body is reflective of the surrounding demographics, wherein over 98% of the population is Hispanic / Latino, with cultural ties with both Central and South America as well as Mexico. The majority of the student body is first generation immigrants with parents originally from Mexico and over 28% of our students are classified as English Language Learners. The staff is all United States Citizens with cultural ties to several areas that make up the Americas. The majority of staff members are bilingual in both American English and Spanish. 2
4 Statistical Demographic Information Reporting Ethnicity # % # % # % African American 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% American Indian or Alaskan Native 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 1 1 / 252 =.39% Asian American 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% Filipino American 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% Hispanic or Latino / 98 = 98.9% / 252 = 98.8% Pacific Islander 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% White (Not Hispanic) 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 1 1 / 252 =.39% Other Ethnicity or Missing 1 1 / 98 = 1.02% 1 1 / 252 =.39% Other Demographics # % # % # % English Learner (EL) / 98 = 28.6% / 252 = 17.9% Long Term English Learner (LTEL) 4 4 / 98 = 4.1% 1 1 / 252 =.39% RFEP / 25 = 60% / 46 = 44.4% Economically Disadvantaged / 98 = 60.2% / 252 = 91.7% Students with Disabilities (SWD) 8 8 / 98 = 8.2% / 252 = 9.1% Migrant Education 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% Gifted and Talented Ed. (GATE) 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 2 2 / 252 =.79% 3
5 PTLAMS School Vision and Mission Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School s mission is to provide a world-class education to every student through an inquiry and investigation school model that will prepare students to meet the challenges of a global 21 st century. We will fulfill our mission with: 1. High Academic Achievement 2. Standards-Based Instruction 3. Positive Student Character Development 4. Community Participation Our mission statement was written to align with the IB mission statement because our vision from the beginning was to become an International Baccalaureate school. The Middle Years Program plays a vital role in fulfilling the mission to bring a world-class education to our students. Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School is confident in its ability to apply the philosophies of the International Baccalaureate Organization into our standards based curriculum. In order to afford its students the opportunity to rise above their challenges and achieve the character and knowledge needed in order to fill the role of servant for their community. With the Learner Profiles and Attitudes of the IB MYP, Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School students go further than their peers toward meeting the needs of the world as a whole. It is with that knowledge that Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School fully embraces the ideals set forth in the IB MYP. 4
6 PTLAMS Academic Programs MYP STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School is a vibrant and diverse community whose purpose is to promote personal and intellectual growth. We provide challenging, engaging programs in a nurturing learning environment, devoting care and attention to every student. Embracing high standards of character, commitment, and achievement, Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School encourages students to think critically and creatively and to act ethically. GENERAL INFORMATION We believe that our curriculum should help students develop intellectual abilities and interests, social awareness, personal competencies, and a code of ethics. Hence, students explore courses in a variety of areas. The sequence of course requirements provides a balance between gaining a solid knowledge and learning foundation, exploring a wide range of inter-connected subjects, and obtaining needed skills for success in high school, college, and careers. The curriculum is designed to provide students with a wide range of opportunities and experiences, expanding their neurological capacity for life. In the Middle School, we emphasize deeper understanding and connections, as well as learning how to learn. As students begin to take more responsibility for their own learning, the faculty members remain supportive and nurture personal growth. Teachers work to build explicit links between subjects, with a theme-based approach, in order to deepen students understanding of the world in which they live and to enable students to ask higher-level thinking questions. Our hope is to engender students sense of wonder and possibility and develop a belief in every student that they are a powerful learner. Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School provides experiences that allow students to grow morally as well. We believe that we should prepare our students to be confident, independent, and responsible citizens. It is also our aim to help students learn to lead their day-to-day lives with compassion and kindness and to serve the needs of others. Finally, it is the fervent hope of Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School that students will have gained not only a personal vision, but also will take joy in the discovery and fulfillment of that vision. We work to endow them with the moral fiber to work through difficulty toward a true understanding of the way in which individual goals can harmonize with the greater good of the world. Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School's programs are committed to this development. 5
7 Section I STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY THIS SECTION CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING: DATA AND ANALYSIS OF THE DATA FOR , , and Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School Testing Outcomes Dashboard Overall ELA & Math English Language Learners (ELL / EL) Special Education (SpEd / CMA) Low Socioeconomic (LSE / Title I) Comparisons ELA Comparisons Math Benchmark Outcomes Actual & Forecasted Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments & Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments California Standards Testing (CST / SBAC) Simulation: - English Language Arts - Mathematics - Science Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments & Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments Academic Performance Index (API / CAASPP) Simulation - English Language Arts - Mathematics - Science California English Language Development Test (CELDT) Other Local / Site Measures of Academic Achievement 6
8 PTLAMS Testing Outcomes Dashboard ( ) Grade ELA Prof Levels Math Prof Levels % 45.7% 7 31% 17% Total 47% 32% Grade ELL ELA Prof Levels ELL Math Prof Levels % 77.8% 7 50% 56.3% Total 56% 64% Grade ELA Prof Levels SPED Math Prof Levels SPED 6 50% 0% 7 50% 0% Total 50% 0% Grade ELA Prof Levels Low SE Math Prof Levels Low SE 6 40% 50% 7 20% 20% Total 28% 32% 7
9 PTLAMS Testing Outcomes Dashboard ( ) Grade ELA ALL ELL ELA ELA SPED ELA Low SE % 66.7% 50% 40% 7 31% 50% 50% 20% Total 47% 56% 50% 28% Grade Math ALL ELL Math Math SPED Math Low SE % 77.8% 0% 50% 7 17% 56.3% 0% 20% Total 32% 64% 0% 32% Benchmark ACTUAL FORECASTED Benchmark 1 Benchmark 2 Benchmark 3 Benchmark 4 Benchmark
10 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) California Standards Testing (CST) Simulation (ELA) Table 1A: Academic Performance by Grade Level CST Simulation ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ELA Benchmark (Previous Year) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total A B th Grade Total A B ELA Benchmark (1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total A B th Grade Total A B ELA Benchmark (2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total A B th Grade Total A B ELA Benchmark (3 / 1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 4 (+2) 16 (+5) 16 (-4) 5 (-2) 2 (-2) 6A (-2) 1 (-1) 6B 4 (+2) 10 (+5) 6 (-4) 3 1 (-1) 7th Grade Total 0 7 (+3) 27 (+3) 6 (-2) 0 (-2) 7A (-1) 3 (+2) 0 7B 0 5 (+3) 14 (+4) 3 (-4) 0 (-2) ELA Benchmark (4 / 2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 0 8 (+1) 32 (+7) 4 (-6) 1 (-4) 6A 0 3 (+1) 16 (+3) 1 (-4) 1 (-1) 6B (+4) 3 (-2) 0 (-3) 7th Grade Total 0 6 (+2) 27 (+2) 9 (-3) 0 (-3) 7A 0 3 (+1) 12 (-5) 4 0 7B 0 3 (+1) 15 (+7) 5 (-3) 0 (-3) ELA Benchmark (5 / 3) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 6 (+6) 20 (+12) 17 (-15) 2 (-2) 2 (+1) 6A 2 (+2) 9 (+6) 10 (-6) 1 1 6B 4 (+4) 11 (+6) 7 (-9) 1 (-2) 1 (+1) 7th Grade Total 0 12 (+6) 27 3 (-6) 1 (+1) 7A 0 5 (+2) 13 (+1) 1 (-3) 1 (+1) 7B 0 7 (+4) 14 (-1) 2 (-3) 0 9
11 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) California Standards Testing (CST) Simulation (Math) Table 1B: Academic Performance by Grade Level CST Simulation MATHEMATICS Math Benchmark (Previous Year) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total A B th Grade Total A B Math Benchmark (1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total A B th Grade Total A B Math Benchmark (2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total A B th Grade Total A B Math Benchmark (3 / 1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 0 9 (+4) 23 (-3) 11 (-2) 0 6A 0 5 (+4) 8 (-4) 6 (-3) 0 6B (+1) 5 (+1) 0 7th Grade Total 0 2 (-1) 16 (+7) 21 1 (-4) 7A 0 2 (+1) 6 (-1) 10 (+5) 0 (-4) 7B 0 0 (-2) 10 (+8) 11 (-5) 1 Math Benchmark (4 / 2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 0 11 (+5) 27 (-1) 7 (-6) 0 6A 0 4 (+1) 13 (+3) 4 (-5) 0 6B 0 7 (+4) 14 (-4) 3 (-1) 0 7th Grade Total 1 (+1) (-3) 7A 1 (+1) 2 (+1) 8 (+2) 6 (-6) 2 (-2) 7B 0 0 (-1) 10 (-2) 13 (+6) 0 (-1) Math Benchmark (5 / 3) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 1 (+1) 20 (+9) 18 (-9) 8 (+1) 1 (+1) 6A 0 7 (+3) 10 (-3) 5 (+1) 1 (+1) 6B 1 (+1) 13 (+6) 8 (-6) 3 0 7th Grade Total 0 (-1) 7 (+5) 14 (-4) 18 (-1) 2 7A 0 (-1) 1 (-1) 7 (-1) 9 (+3) 1 (-1) 7B 0 6 (+6) 7 (-3) 9 (-4) 1 (+1) 10
12 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Previous Year) Table 2A: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Previous Year ELA Math Total 6th Grade A B th Grade A B API BENCHMARK PREVIOUS YEAR ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 18 PROFICIENT 19 BASIC 15 BASIC 12 BELOW BASIC 5 BELOW BASIC 8 FAR BELOW BASIC 4 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 ELA 6 Special Ed Math 6 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 280 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 380 BASIC 1 Grade 7 API 554 BASIC 0 Grade 7 API 394 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 3 Total Sp Ed API 417 FAR BELOW BASIC 3 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 Total Sp Ed API 350 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 9 PROFICIENT 4 BASIC 10 BASIC 16 BELOW BASIC 8 BELOW BASIC 17 FAR BELOW BASIC 10 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Special Ed Math 7 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 280 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 305 BASIC 2 Grade 7 API 554 BASIC 1 Grade 7 API 454 BELOW BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 3 Total Sp Ed API 417 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API Regular Ed 74 Regular Ed _9 Special Ed _9 Special Ed 83 Total Students 83 Total Students 658 Total Current API without CMA Bump and no correlation for 6th Grade Science Forecast with continued % growth = API by CST 11
13 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 1) Table 2B: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Total / ELA Math Benchmark 1 Bridge 6th Grade A B th Grade A B API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 1 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 11 PROFICIENT 5 BASIC 20 BASIC 26 BELOW BASIC 7 BELOW BASIC 13 FAR BELOW BASIC 4 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed Math 6 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 200 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 555 BASIC 1 BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 3 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 4 PROFICIENT 3 BASIC 24 BASIC 9 BELOW BASIC 8 BELOW BASIC 21 FAR BELOW BASIC 2 FAR BELOW BASIC 5 ELA 7 Special Ed Math 7 Special Ed ADVANCED API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 494 BASIC 2 BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 2 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 79 Regular Ed 79 Regular Ed _9 Special Ed _9 Special Ed 88 Total Students 88 Total Students 652 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with continued % growth = API by CST 12
14 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 2) Table 2C: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Total / ELA Math Benchmark 2 Bridge 6th Grade A B th Grade A B API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 2 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 7 PROFICIENT 6 BASIC 25 BASIC 28 BELOW BASIC 8 BELOW BASIC 10 FAR BELOW BASIC 4 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed Math 6 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 355 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 455 BASIC 0 BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 3 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 4 PROFICIENT 2 BASIC 21 BASIC 17 BELOW BASIC 11 BELOW BASIC 15 FAR BELOW BASIC 3 FAR BELOW BASIC 3 ELA 7 Special Ed Math 7 Special Ed ADVANCED API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 514 BASIC 4 BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 4 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 80 Regular Ed 80 Regular Ed _9 Special Ed _9 Special Ed 89 Total Students 89 Total Students 655 Total Current API without CMA Bump, With Only 6 Weeks Measured Instead of 8-10 Forecast with continued 1% growth = 674 API by CST 13
15 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 3) Table 2D: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Total / ELA Math Benchmark 3 Bridge 6th Grade A B th Grade A B API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 3 / 1 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 16 PROFICIENT 9 BASIC 16 BASIC 23 BELOW BASIC 5 BELOW BASIC 11 FAR BELOW BASIC 2 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed Math 6 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 489 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 655 BASIC 2 BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 7 PROFICIENT 2 BASIC 27 BASIC 16 BELOW BASIC 6 BELOW BASIC 21 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 ELA 7 Special Ed Math 7 Special Ed ADVANCED API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 2 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 474 BASIC 1 BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 4 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 83 Regular Ed 83 Regular Ed _7 Special Ed _7 Special Ed 90 Total Students 90 Total Students 714 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with continued 9.5% growth = 782 API by CST 14
16 API Benchmark Benchmark 4 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 4) Table 2E: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total ELA (No SpEd) Math (No SpEd) 6th Grade A B th Grade A Total / Bridge 734 No SpEd 721 w/ SpEd 721 No SpEd 697 w/ SpEd 746 No SpEd 743 w/ SpEd 689 No SpEd 682 w/ SpEd 708 No SpEd 691 w/ SpEd 7B API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 4 / 2 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 8 PROFICIENT 11 BASIC 32 BASIC 27 BELOW BASIC 4 BELOW BASIC 7 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed Math 6 Special Ed ADVANCED API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 1 Grade 6 API 718 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 725 BASIC 2 BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 2 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 6 PROFICIENT 2 BASIC 27 BASIC 18 BELOW BASIC 7 BELOW BASIC 19 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 2 ELA 7 Special Ed Math 7 Special Ed ADVANCED API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 719 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 626 BASIC 2 BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 87 Regular Ed 87 Regular Ed _6 Special Ed _6 Special Ed 93 Total Students 93 Total Students 710 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with continued??.??% growth =??? API by CST 15
17 API Benchmark Benchmark 5 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 5) Table 2F: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total ELA (No SpEd) Math (No SpEd) 6th Grade A B th Grade A B Total / Bridge 792 No SpEd 778 w/ SpEd 762 No SpEd 755 w/ SpEd 820 No SpEd 802 w/ SpEd 720 No SpEd 716 w/ SpEd 698 No SpEd 692 w/ SpEd 739 No SpEd 739 w/ SpEd API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 5 / 3 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 20 PROFICIENT 20 BASIC 17 BASIC 18 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 8 FAR BELOW BASIC 2 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 ELA 6 Special Ed Math 6 Special Ed ADVANCED API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 2 Grade 6 API 796 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 752 BASIC 1 BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 12 PROFICIENT 7 BASIC 27 BASIC 15 BELOW BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 19 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 2 ELA 7 Special Ed Math 7 Special Ed ADVANCED API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 760 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 649 BASIC 2 BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 2 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 91 Regular Ed 91 Regular Ed _7 Special Ed _7 Special Ed 98 Total Students 98 Total Students 749 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with continued??.??% growth =??? API by CST 16
18 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA FINAL OUTCOME Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation 17
19 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA OVERALL GROWTH Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation All Class ELA Growth (Omer) ELA Prof Levels (Omer) Math Growth (Downey) Math Prof Levels (Downey) 6A 17/21 = 81% 13/21 = 62% 16/21 = 76.2% 7/21 = 33.3% 6B 18/25 = 72% 15/25 = 60% 21/25 = 84% 14/25 = 56% Grade 6 All Total 35/46 = 76.1% 28/46 = 60.9% 37/46 = 80.4% 21/46 = 45.7% All Class ELA Growth (Marquez) ELA Prof Levels (Marquez) Math Growth (Chen) Math Prof Levels (Chen) 7A 9/19 = 47.4% 6/19 = 32% 10/19 = 53% 1/19 = 5.3% 7B 12/23 = 52.2% 7/23 = 30.4% 15/23 = 65.2% 6/23 = 26.1% Grade 7 All Total 21/42 = 50% 13/42 = 31% 25/42 = 60% 7/42 = 17% PTLAMS All Total 56/88 = 64% 41/88 = 47% 62/88 = 70.5% 28/88 = 32% EL ELA Growth (Omer) ELA Prof Levels (Omer) Math Growth (Downey) Math Prof Levels (Downey) 6A 7/9 = 77.8% 6/9 = 66.7% 8/9 = 88.9% 7/9 = 77.8% 6B N/A N/A N/A N/A Grade 6 EL Total 7/9 = 77.8% 6/9 = 66.7% 8/9 = % 7/9 = 77.8% EL ELA Growth (Marquez) ELA Prof Levels (Marquez) Math Growth (Chen) Math Prof Levels (Chen) 7A 9/14 = 64.3% 7/14 = 50% 10/14 = 71.4% 8/14 = 57.1% 7B 1/2 = 50% 1/2 = 50% 2/2 = 100% 1/2 = 50% Grade 7 EL Total 10/16 = 62.5% 8/16 = 50% 12/16 = 75% 9/16 = 56.3% PTLAMS EL Total 17/25 = 68% 14/25 = 56% 20/25 = 80% 16/25 = 64% SpEd ELA Growth (Omer) ELA Prof Levels (Omer) Math Growth (Downey) Math Prof Levels (Downey) 6A 3/3 = 100% 2/3 = 67% 1/3 = 33.3% 0/3 = 0% 6B 0/1 = 0% 0/1 = 0% 1/1 = 100% 0/1 = 0% Grade 6 SpEd Total 3/4 = 75% 2/4 = 50% 2/4 = 50% 0/4 = 0% SpEd ELA Growth (Marquez) ELA Prof Levels (Marquez) Math Growth (Chen) Math Prof Levels (Chen) 7A 1/2 = 50% 1/2 = 50% 2/2 = 100% 0/2 = 0% 7B No SpEd Students No SpEd Students No SpEd Students No SpEd Students Grade 7 SpEd Total 1/2 = 50% 1/2 = 50% 2/2 = 100% 0/2 = 0% PTLAMS SpEd Total 2/4 = 50% 2/4 = 50% 4/4 = 100% 0/4 = 0% 18
20 Grade Student Is Currently Enrolled STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY California English Language Development Test (CELDT) ( ) Table 3A: Academic Performance by Grade Level CELDT Grade 6 CELDT Overall Oct Grade 6 CELDT Reclassify (Date) Last Name First Name Listening Oct Speaking Oct Reading Oct Writing Oct CST ELA May January February February / 3 6 January February January February January January / / 3 February Sept February January October February February English Only / / 3 February January January English Only 6 January February January February Orange = Reclassified Green = Needs To Be Re-Tested Prepa Tec Los Angeles EL Reclassification Rate Percentage: 15 out of 25 = 60% 19
21 Grade Student Is Currently Enrolled STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY California English Language Development Test (CELDT) ( ) Table 3B: Academic Performance by Grade Level CELDT Grade 7 CELDT Overall Oct Grade 7 CELDT Reclassify (Date) Last Name First Name Listening Oct Speaking Oct Reading Oct Writing Oct CST ELA May Sept July English Only 333 English Only February January January Nov February August March February February February February February Orange = Reclassified Green = Needs To Be Re-Tested Prepa Tec Los Angeles EL Reclassification Rate Percentage: 15 out of 25 = 60% 20
22 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) California Standards Testing (CST) Simulation (ELA Part 1 of 2) Table 1A: Academic Performance by Grade Level CST Simulation ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ELA Benchmark (Previous Year) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C ELA Benchmark (1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 2 55 (2 SpEd) 25 (2 SpEd) 2 (2 SpEd) N/A 6A N/A 6B 0 15 (2 SpEd) 2 (1 SpEd) 0 N/A 6C (1 SpEd) N/A 6D (1 SpEd) 1 N/A 6E (1 SpEd) N/A 7th Grade Total 6 46 (1 SpEd) 18 (4 SpEd) 5 (1 SpEd) N/A 7A (2 SpEd) 2 N/A 7B (2 SpEd) 1 (1 SpEd) N/A 7C 0 20 (1 SpEd) 4 2 N/A 8th Grade Total 3 22 (1 SpEd) 21 (1 SpEd) 13 (2 SpEd) N/A 8A 2 5 (1 SpEd) 6 6 (1 SpEd) N/A 8B (1 SpEd) 3 (1 SpEd) N/A 8C N/A ELA Benchmark (2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total (1 SpEd) 15 (6 SpEd) 4 (1 SpEd) N/A 6A N/A 6B (3 SpEd) 0 N/A 6C (1 SpEd) 1 N/A 6D (1 SpEd) 1 (1 SpEd) N/A 6E 2 9 (1 SpEd) 4 (1 SpEd) 2 N/A 7th Grade Total 4 44 (1 SpEd) 23 (4 SpEd) 5 (2 SpEd) N/A 7A 2 16 (1 SpEd) 5 2 (2 SpEd) N/A 7B (3 SpEd) 1 N/A 7C (1 SpEd) 2 N/A 8th Grade Total (3 SpEd) 4 (1 SpEd) N/A 8A N/A 8B (3 SpEd) (1 SpEd) N/A 8C N/A 21
23 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) California Standards Testing (CST) Simulation (ELA Part 2 of 2) Table 1A: Academic Performance by Grade Level CST Simulation ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ELA Benchmark (3 / 1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total (3 SpEd) 22 (4 SpEd) 4 (2 SpEd) N/A 6A N/A 6B 5 11 (1 SpEd) 1 (2 SpEd) 0 N/A 6C (1 SpEd) 0 N/A 6D (1 SpEd) 2 (2 SpEd) N/A 6E 1 10 (2 SpEd) 5 2 N/A 7th Grade Total 6 46 (3 SpEd) 20 (3 SpEd) 5 (1 SpEd) N/A 7A 2 20 (2 SpEd) 3 (1 SpEd) 0 N/A 7B (2 SpEd) 5 (1 SpEd) N/A 7C 3 14 (1 SpEd) 10 0 N/A 8th Grade Total 2 20 (2 SpEd) 31 8 (3 SpEd) N/A 8A N/A 8B 0 5 (2 SpEd) 13 1 (2 SpEd) N/A 8C (1 SpEd) N/A ELA Benchmark (4 / 2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 8 48 (1 SpEd) 30 (6 SpEd) 4 (2 SpEd) N/A 6A N/A 6B (2 SpEd) (1 SpEd) N/A 6C (1 SpEd) 0 N/A 6D (2 SpEd) 1 (1 SpEd) N/A 6E 1 5 (1 SpEd) 11 (1 SpEd) 0 N/A 7th Grade Total 9 47 (2 SpEd) 17 (5 SpEd) 2 N/A 7A 4 16 (1 SpEd) 4 (2 SpEd) 0 N/A 7B (3 SpEd) 1 N/A 7C 3 14 (1 SpEd) 8 1 N/A 8th Grade Total 5 29 (1 SpEd) 19 (2 SpEd) 7 (2 SpEd) N/A 8A N/A 8B 1 9 (1 SpEd) 8 (2 SpEd) 1 N/A 8C (2 SpEd) N/A 22
24 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) California Standards Testing (CST) Simulation (Math Part 1 of 2) Table 1B: Academic Performance by Grade Level CST Simulation MATHEMATICS Math Benchmark (Previous Year) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C Math Benchmark (1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total (5 SpEd) 40 (1 SpEd) N/A 6A N/A 6B (2 SpEd) 5 (1 SpEd) N/A 6C (1 SpEd) N/A 6D (1 SpEd) 6 N/A 6E (2 SpEd) 6 N/A 7th Grade Total (2 SpEd) 31 (4 SpEd) N/A 7A (2 SpEd) N/A 7B (1 SpEd) 11 (2 SpEd) N/A 7C (1 SpEd) 14 N/A 8th Grade Total (1 SpEd) 37 (3 SpEd) N/A 8A (2 SpEd) N/A 8B (1 SpEd) 15 (1 SpEd) N/A 8C N/A Math Benchmark (2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total (1 SpEd) 42 (7 SpEd) N/A 6A N/A 6B (3 SpEd) N/A 6C (1 SpEd) N/A 6D (2 SpEd) N/A 6E (1 SpEd) 6 (1 SpEd) N/A 7th Grade Total 3 18 (1 SpEd) (6 SpEd) N/A 7A (3 SpEd) N/A 7B (3 SpEd) N/A 7C 2 7 (1 SpEd) 6 11 N/A 8th Grade Total 4 22 (1 SpEd) 15 (1 SpEd) 18 (3 SpEd) N/A 8A N/A 8B 0 7 (1 SpEd) 7 (1 SpEd) 4 (2 SpEd) N/A 8C (1 SpEd) N/A 23
25 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) California Standards Testing (CST) Simulation (Math Part 2 of 2) Table 1B: Academic Performance by Grade Level CST Simulation MATHEMATICS Math Benchmark (3 / 1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total (3 SpEd) 18 (6 SpEd) N/A 6A N/A 6B (2 SpEd) 2 (1 SpEd) N/A 6C (1 SpEd) N/A 6D (3 SpEd) N/A 6E (1 SpEd) 1 (1 SpEd) N/A 7th Grade Total 7 29 (1 SpEd) 20 (1 SpEd) 21 (4 SpEd) N/A 7A (3 SpEd) N/A 7B 1 8 (1 SpEd) 9 8 (1 SpEd) N/A 7C (1 SpEd) 5 N/A 8th Grade Total (1 SpEd) 24 (5 SpEd) N/A 8A N/A 8B (1 SpEd) 8 (3 SpEd) N/A 8C (2 SpEd) N/A Math Benchmark (4 / 2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total (1 SpEd) 39 (6 SpEd) 10 (2 SpEd) N/A 6A N/A 6B 3 7 (1 SpEd) 7 (2 SpEd) 0 N/A 6C (1 SpEd) N/A 6D (2 SpEd) 2 (1 SpEd) N/A 6E (2 SpEd) 3 N/A 7th Grade Total (3 SpEd) 18 (3 SpEd) N/A 7A (3 SpEd) N/A 7B (3 SpEd) 6 N/A 7C 2 10 (1 SpEd) 8 6 N/A 8th Grade Total (1 SpEd) 26 (5 SpEd) N/A 8A N/A 8B (1 SpEd) 8 (2 SpEd) N/A 8C (3 SpEd) N/A 24
26 API Benchmark Previous Year 6th Grade 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 7th Grade 7A 7B 7C 8th Grade 8A 8B 8C STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Previous Year) Table 2A: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total ELA Math Total / Bridge API BENCHMARK PREVIOUS YEAR ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED??? API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED??? API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT PROFICIENT BASIC BASIC BELOW BASIC BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED Grade 6 API??? ADVANCED Grade 6 API??? PROFICIENT Grade 7 API??? PROFICIENT Grade 7 API??? BASIC Grade 8 API??? BASIC Grade 8 API??? BELOW BASIC BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API??? FAR BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED??? API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED??? API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT PROFICIENT BASIC BASIC BELOW BASIC BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED Grade 6 API??? ADVANCED Grade 6 API??? PROFICIENT Grade 7 API??? PROFICIENT Grade 7 API??? BASIC Grade 8 API??? BASIC Grade 8 API??? BELOW BASIC BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API??? FAR BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg ADVANCED??? API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED??? API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT PROFICIENT BASIC BASIC BELOW BASIC BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED Grade 6 API??? ADVANCED Grade 6 API??? PROFICIENT Grade 7 API??? PROFICIENT Grade 7 API??? BASIC Grade 8 API??? BASIC Grade 8 API??? BELOW BASIC BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API??? FAR BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API?????? Regular Ed??? Regular Ed??? Special Ed??? Special Ed??? Total Students??? Total Students??? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued??.?? % growth = API by CST / SBAC 25
27 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 1) Table 2B: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Benchmark 1 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade A B C D E th Grade A B C th Grade A B C API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 1 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 55 PROFICIENT 11 BASIC 25 BASIC 34 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 40 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED Grade 6 API ADVANCED Grade 6 API PROFICIENT Grade 7 API PROFICIENT Grade 7 API BASIC Grade 8 API BASIC Grade 8 API BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 46 PROFICIENT 13 BASIC 18 BASIC 29 BELOW BASIC 5 BELOW BASIC 31 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED Grade 6 API ADVANCED Grade 6 API PROFICIENT Grade 7 API PROFICIENT Grade 7 API BASIC Grade 8 API BASIC Grade 8 API BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 22 PROFICIENT 4 BASIC 21 BASIC 17 BELOW BASIC 13 BELOW BASIC 37 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED Grade 6 API ADVANCED Grade 6 API PROFICIENT Grade 7 API PROFICIENT Grade 7 API BASIC Grade 8 API BASIC Grade 8 API BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API 218 Regular Ed 217 Regular Ed 16 Special Ed 17 Special Ed 234 Total Students 234 Total Students 752 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued??.?? % growth = API by CST / SBAC 26
28 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 2) Table 2C: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Benchmark 2 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade A B C D E th Grade A B C th Grade A B C API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 2 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 58 PROFICIENT 5 BASIC 15 BASIC 37 BELOW BASIC 4 BELOW BASIC 42 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 652 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 480 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 642 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 528 BASIC 6 Grade 8 API 624 BASIC 1 Grade 8 API 589 BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 7 Total Sp Ed API 636 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 524 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 44 PROFICIENT 18 BASIC 23 BASIC 19 BELOW BASIC 5 BELOW BASIC 36 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 652 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 480 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 642 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 528 BASIC 4 Grade 8 API 624 BASIC 0 Grade 8 API 589 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 6 Total Sp Ed API 636 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 524 ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 35 PROFICIENT 22 BASIC 19 BASIC 15 BELOW BASIC 4 BELOW BASIC 18 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 652 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 480 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 642 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 528 BASIC 3 Grade 8 API 624 BASIC 1 Grade 8 API 589 BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 3 Total Sp Ed API 636 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API Regular Ed 222 Regular Ed 19 Special Ed 20 Special Ed 241 Total Students 242 Total Students 774 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued 2.1 % growth = 806 API by CST / SBAC 27
29 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 3 / 1) Table 2D: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Benchmark 3 / 1 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade A B C D E th Grade A B C th Grade A B C API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 3 / 1 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 53 PROFICIENT 23 BASIC 22 BASIC 44 BELOW BASIC 4 BELOW BASIC 19 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 669 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 522 PROFICIENT 3 Grade 7 API 721 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 585 BASIC 4 Grade 8 API 624 BASIC 3 Grade 8 API 508 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 6 Total Sp Ed API 676 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 538 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 45 PROFICIENT 29 BASIC 20 BASIC 19 BELOW BASIC 5 BELOW BASIC 8 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 669 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 522 PROFICIENT 3 Grade 7 API 721 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 585 BASIC 3 Grade 8 API 624 BASIC 2 Grade 8 API 508 BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 4 Total Sp Ed API 676 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 538 ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 20 PROFICIENT 15 BASIC 31 BASIC 16 BELOW BASIC 8 BELOW BASIC 25 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 669 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 522 PROFICIENT 2 Grade 7 API 721 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 585 BASIC 0 Grade 8 API 624 BASIC 1 Grade 8 API 508 BELOW BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 4 Total Sp Ed API 676 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API Regular Ed 228 Regular Ed 21 Special Ed 22 Special Ed 249 Total Students 250 Total Students 787 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued 1.7% growth = 801 API by CST / SBAC 28
30 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 4 / 2) Table 2E: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Benchmark 4 / 2 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade A B C D E th Grade A B C th Grade A B C API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 4 / 2 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 50 PROFICIENT 26 BASIC 30 BASIC 39 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 9 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 630 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 630 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 724 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 614 BASIC 7 Grade 8 API 629 BASIC 7 Grade 8 API 514 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 2 Total Sp Ed API 661 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 597 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 47 PROFICIENT 26 BASIC 17 BASIC 21 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 18 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 630 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 630 PROFICIENT 2 Grade 7 API 724 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 614 BASIC 5 Grade 8 API 629 BASIC 3 Grade 8 API 514 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 3 Total Sp Ed API 661 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 597 ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg ADVANCED API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 29 PROFICIENT 20 BASIC 19 BASIC 11 BELOW BASIC 8 BELOW BASIC 23 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 630 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 630 PROFICIENT 2 Grade 7 API 724 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 614 BASIC 2 Grade 8 API 629 BASIC 2 Grade 8 API 514 BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 2 Total Sp Ed API 661 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API Regular Ed 229 Regular Ed 22 Special Ed 22 Special Ed 251 Total Students 251 Total Students 811 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued 3.3 % growth = 839 API by CST / SBAC 29
31 811 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with 3.3% growth = 839 API by SBAC SWD = 657 EL = 744 LSE = 821 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA All Students PTLAMS ELA All 251 Total PTLAMS ELA All % ADVANCED % PROFICIENT % BASIC % BELOW BASIC % FAR BELOW BASIC % PTLAMS ELA All API Total 837 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA SWD Only Students PTLAMS ELA SWD Only 22 Total PTLAMS ELA SWD Only % ADVANCED % PROFICIENT % BASIC % BELOW BASIC % FAR BELOW BASIC % PTLAMS ELA SWD Only API Total 678 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA EL Only Students PTLAMS ELA EL Only 46 Total PTLAMS ELA EL Only % ADVANCED % PROFICIENT % BASIC % BELOW BASIC % FAR BELOW BASIC % PTLAMS ELA EL Only API Total 770 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA Title 1 (Low SocioEconomic) Students PTLAMS ELA Title 1 Only 199 Total PTLAMS ELA Title 1 Only % ADVANCED % PROFICIENT % BASIC % BELOW BASIC % FAR BELOW BASIC % PTLAMS ELA Title 1 Only API Total
32 811 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with 3.3% growth = 839 API by SBAC SWD = 657 EL = 744 LSE = 821 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math All Students PTLAMS Math All 251 Total PTLAMS Math All % ADVANCED % PROFICIENT % BASIC % BELOW BASIC % FAR BELOW BASIC % PTLAMS Math All API Total 777 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math SWD Only Students PTLAMS Math SWD Only 22 Total PTLAMS Math SWD Only % ADVANCED % PROFICIENT % BASIC % BELOW BASIC % FAR BELOW BASIC % PTLAMS Math SWD Only API Total 626 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math EL Only Students PTLAMS Math EL Only 46 Total PTLAMS Math EL Only % ADVANCED % PROFICIENT % BASIC % BELOW BASIC % FAR BELOW BASIC % PTLAMS ELA Math Only API Total 706 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math Title 1 (Low SocioEconomic) Students PTLAMS Math Title 1 Only 199 Total PTLAMS Math Title 1 Only % ADVANCED % PROFICIENT % BASIC % BELOW BASIC % FAR BELOW BASIC % PTLAMS Math Title 1 Only API Total
33 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA OVERALL GROWTH Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation All Class ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 6A 18 / 20 = 90% 15 / 20 = 75% 17 / 20 = 85% 15 / 20 = 75% 6B 14 / 20 = 70% 13 / 20 = 65% 16 / 20 = 80% 15 / 20 = 75% 6C 12 / 20 = 60% 11 / 20 = 55% 19 / 20 = 95% 18 / 20 = 90% 6D 17 / 20 = 85% 16 / 20 = 80% 16 / 20 = 80% 16 / 20 = 80% 6E 15 / 19 = 79% 13 / 19 = 69% 14 / 19 = 74% 13 / 19 = 69% Grade 6 All Total 76 / 99 = 77% 68 / 99 = 69% 82 / 99 = 83% 77 / 99 = 78% All Class ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 7A 23 / 28 = 82% 20 / 28 = 72% 21 / 28 = 75% 19 / 28 = 68% 7B 20 / 28 = 72% 18 / 28 = 65% 20 / 28 = 72% 17 / 28 = 61% 7C 18 / 27 = 67% 17 / 27 = 63% 22 / 27 = 82% 20 / 27 = 74% Grade 7 All Total 61 / 83 = 74% 55 / 83 = 66% 63 / 83 = 76% 56 / 83 = 68% All Class ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 8A 16 / 21 = 76% 15 / 21 = 72% 18 / 21 = 86% 16 / 21 = 76% 8B 16 / 23 = 70% 14 / 23 = 61% 17 / 23 = 74% 16 / 23 = 70% 8C 16 / 23 = 70% 13 / 23 = 57% 15 / 23 = 65% 14 / 23 = 61% Grade 8 All Total 48 / 67 = 72% 42 / 67 = 63% 50 / 67 = 75% 46 / 67 = 69% PTLAMS All Total 185 / 249 = 75% 165 / 249 = 67% 195 / 249 = 79% 179 / 249 = 72% EL ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 6A 3 / 3 = 100% 2 / 3 = 67% 3 / 3 = 100% 2 / 3 = 67% 6B 4 / 5 = 80% 4 / 5 = 80% 4 / 5 = 80% 4 / 5 = 80% 6C 2 / 2 = 100% 1 / 2 = 50% 2 / 2 = 100% 1 / 2 = 50% 6D 2 / 4 = 50% 1 / 4 = 25% 2 / 4 = 50% 1 / 4 = 25% 6E 4 / 4 = 100% 3 / 4 = 75% 1 / 4 = 25% 1 / 4 = 25% Grade 6 EL Total 15 / 18 = 83% 11 / 18 = 61% 12 / 18 = 67% 9 / 18 = 50% EL ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 7A 7 / 9 = 78% 5 / 9 = 56% 8 / 9 = 89% 5 / 9 = 56% 7B 3 / 4 = 75% 1 / 4 = 25% 3 / 4 = 75% 2 / 4 = 50% 7C 0 / 1 = 0% 0 / 1 = 0% 0 / 1 = 0% 0 / 1 = 0% Grade 7 EL Total 10 / 14 = 72% 6 / 14 = 43% 11 / 14 = 79% 7 / 14 = 50% EL ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 8A 0 / 1 = 0% 0 / 1 = 0% 1 / 1 = 100% 1 / 1 = 100% 8B 2 / 4 = 50% 2 / 4 = 50% 2 / 4 = 50% 2 / 4 = 50% 8C 6 / 9 = 67% 4 / 9 = 45% 5 / 9 = 56% 4 / 9 = 45% Grade 8 EL Total 8 / 14 = 57% 6 / 14 = 43% 8 / 14 = 57% 7 / 14 = 50% PTLAMS All Total 33 / 46 = 72% 23 / 46 = 50% 31 / 46 = 68% 23 / 46 = 50% SpEd ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 6A 0 / 0 = N/A 0 / 0 = N/A 0 / 0 = N/A 0 / 0 = N/A 6B 0 / 3 = 0% 0 / 3 = 0% 2 / 3 = 67% 2 / 3 = 67% 6C 1 / 1 = 100% 1 / 1 = 100% 1 / 1 = 100% 0 / 1 = 0% 6D 2 / 3 = 67% 1 / 3 = 33% 2 / 3 = 67% 0 / 3 = 0% 6E 2 / 2 = 100% 1 / 2 = 50% 0 / 2 = 0% 0 / 2 = 0% Grade 6 SpEd Total 5 / 9 = 56% 3 / 9 = 33% 5 / 9 = 56% 2 / 9 = 22% SpEd ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 7A 3 / 3 = 100% 2 / 3 = 67% 2 / 3 = 67% 1 / 3 = 33% 7B 3 / 3 = 100% 1 / 3 = 33% 3 / 3 = 100% 2 / 3 = 67% 7C 1 / 1 = 100% 1 / 1 = 100% 0 / 1 = 0% 0 / 1 = 0% Grade 7 SpEd Total 7 / 7 = 100% 4 / 7 = 57% 5 / 7 = 72% 3 / 7 = 43% SpEd ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 8A 0 / 0 = N/A 0 / 0 = N/A 0 / 0 = N/A 0 / 0 = N/A 8B 3 / 4 = 75% 3 / 4 = 75% 3 / 4 = 75% 2 / 4 = 50% 8C 2 / 3 = 67% 1 / 3 = 33% 1 / 3 = 33% 0 / 3 = 0% Grade 8 SpEd Total 5 / 7 = 72% 4 / 7 = 57% 4 / 7 = 57% 2 / 7 = 29% PTLAMS All Total 17 / 22 = 77% 11 / 22 = 50% 14 / 22 = 64% 7 / 46 = 16% 32
34 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY California English Language Development Test (CELDT) ( ) Table 3A: PTLAMS Overall Academic Performance CELDT Grades 6 8 PTLAMS CELDT Data ( ) Annual Reclassification Data 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11 total out of 21 5 total out of 11 4 total out of % Reclassified 45.45% Reclassified 30.76% Reclassified 45 Total Annuals Took CELDT ( ) 20 Students Will Be Reclassified Out Of 45 Annual Students Tested 44.44% Total Students Reclassified Initials Data 1 Initial Student in 8th Grade out of 46 Total Students Tested Including Annuals 46 Total CELDT Students ( ) Both Initial and Annual 247 Current School Enrollment 18.62% of Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School Students Participated in CELDT ( ) *This data does not include new students who were tested at other schools. This data reflects students who were tested during the CELDT Initial and Annual Deadlines. 33
35 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments ( ) Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) Simulation (ELA Part 1 of 2) Table 1A: Academic Performance by Grade Level SBAC Simulation ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ELA Benchmark (1) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D ELA Benchmark (2) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D 34
36 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments ( ) Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) Simulation (ELA Part 2 of 2) Table 1A: Academic Performance by Grade Level SBAC Simulation ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ELA Benchmark (3) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D ELA Benchmark (4) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D 35
37 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments ( ) Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) Simulation (Math Part 1 of 2) Table 1B: Academic Performance by Grade Level SBAC Simulation MATHEMATICS Math Benchmark (1) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D Math Benchmark (2) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D 36
38 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments ( ) Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) Simulation (Math Part 2 of 2) Table 1B: Academic Performance by Grade Level SBAC Simulation MATHEMATICS Math Benchmark (3) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D Math Benchmark (4) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D 37
39 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 1) Table 2A: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark 1 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade 8A 8B 8C 8D API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 1 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API?????? Regular Ed??? Regular Ed??? Special Ed??? Special Ed??? Total Students??? Total Students??? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued??.?? % growth = API by SBAC 38
40 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 2) Table 2B: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark 2 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade 8A 8B 8C 8D API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 2 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API?????? Regular Ed??? Regular Ed??? Special Ed??? Special Ed??? Total Students??? Total Students??? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued??.?? % growth = API by SBAC 39
41 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 3) Table 2C: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark 3 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade 8A 8B 8C 8D API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 3 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API?????? Regular Ed??? Regular Ed??? Special Ed??? Special Ed??? Total Students??? Total Students??? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued??.?? % growth = API by SBAC 40
42 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 4) Table 2D: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark 4 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade 8A 8B 8C 8D API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 4 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API?????? Regular Ed??? Regular Ed??? Special Ed??? Special Ed??? Total Students??? Total Students??? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued??.?? % growth = API by SBAC 41
43 ??? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with?.??% growth =??? API by SBAC SWD =??? EL =??? LSE =??? ( ) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA All Students PTLAMS ELA All??? Total PTLAMS ELA All % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS ELA All API Total??? ( ) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA SWD Only Students PTLAMS ELA SWD Only??? Total PTLAMS ELA SWD Only % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS ELA SWD Only API Total??? ( ) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA EL Only Students PTLAMS ELA EL Only??? Total PTLAMS ELA EL Only % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS ELA EL Only API Total??? ( ) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA Title 1 (Low SocioEconomic) Students PTLAMS ELA Title 1 Only??? Total PTLAMS ELA Title 1 Only % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS ELA Title 1 Only API Total??? 42
44 ?? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with?.??% growth =??? API by SBAC SWD =??? EL =??? LSE =??? ( ) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math All Students PTLAMS Math All??? Total PTLAMS Math All % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS Math All API Total??? ( ) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math SWD Only Students PTLAMS Math SWD Only??? Total PTLAMS Math SWD Only % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS Math SWD Only API Total??? ( ) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math EL Only Students PTLAMS Math EL Only??? Total PTLAMS Math EL Only % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS ELA Math Only API Total??? ( ) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math Title 1 (Low SocioEconomic) Students PTLAMS Math Title 1 Only??? Total PTLAMS Math Title 1 Only % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS Math Title 1 Only API Total??? 43
45 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA OVERALL GROWTH Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (All Students) All Class ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F Grade 6 All Total All Class ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E Grade 7 All Total All Class ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 8A 8B 8C 8D Grade 8 All Total PTLAMS All Total 44
46 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA OVERALL GROWTH Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (EL Students) EL ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F Grade 6 EL Total EL ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E Grade 7 EL Total EL ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 8A 8B 8C 8D Grade 8 EL Total PTLAMS All Total 45
47 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA OVERALL GROWTH Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments ( ) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (SpEd Students) SpEd ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F Grade 6 SpEd Total SpEd ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E Grade 7 SpEd Total SpEd ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 8A 8B 8C 8D Grade 8 SpEd Total PTLAMS All Total 46
48 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY California English Language Development Test (CELDT) ( ) Table 3A: PTLAMS Overall Academic Performance CELDT Grades 6 8 PTLAMS CELDT Data ( ) Annual Reclassification Data 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade?? total out of???? total out of???? total out of????.??% Reclassified??.??% Reclassified??.??% Reclassified?? Total Annuals Took CELDT ( )?? Students Will Be Reclassified Out Of?? Annual Students Tested??.??% Total Students Reclassified Initials Data?? Initial Student in 8th Grade out of?? Total Students Tested Including Annuals?? Total CELDT Students ( ) Both Initial and Annual??? Current School Enrollment??.??% of Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School Students Participated in CELDT ( ) *This data does not include new students who were tested at other schools. This data reflects students who were tested during the CELDT Initial and Annual Deadlines. 47
49 SECTION II ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EDUCATIONAL PRACTICES Analysis of the school s current educational practices and their effectiveness as reflected by the data is included in the Goals and Objectives Section III. All schools are required to develop action plan(s) to address the following Goals in the LEA Plan until they are fully implemented. Documentation of Full Implementation is included in the Single Plan or available at the school site. A. Alignment of English/Language Arts and Mathematics curriculum, instruction, materials, and staff development to content and performance standards; this includes all students having access to the core curriculum and all teachers utilizing the adopted materials, including universal access components, to fidelity. B. All students, including English Language Learners, At- Risk Students (including Socioeconomically Disadvantaged and other student subgroups), Students with Disabilities, and GATE Students achieving Proficiency on content and performance standards. C. Use of pacing guides and benchmark assessments. D. Use of assessment and data to monitor student achievement and the effectiveness of the academic program. E. Effective parental involvement. * All above goals to include professional development in the action plans 48
50 ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE REQUIRED TITLE I AND PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT SCHOOL ELEMENTS I. All Middle Title I Schools: Strategies for assisting Elementary School Students in the transition to the Middle School Program. In collaboration with the Local Student Development Department administration staff, the following activities are coordinated to assist Elementary Students in a smooth transition to Middle School: Transition day for Elementary School Parents to learn about and tour the school Elementary Students spend time in Middle School classes in late spring Visit local State Elementary Schools and present information about Middle School registration Early Middle School registration (begins during the schools of choice application period) Middle School Parent Information Night Middle School Teachers attend Transition Conference and Collaborate with Elementary Teachers All incoming Middle School Students will be provided with an informational packet when they register for school to boost basic skills. All students and parents are invited to a welcome before school begins to meet with teachers and review Middle School Expectations and Standards. II. All Program Improvement Schools A. Description of implemented corrective action (consultants, DataWorks, etc.) to improve the educational achievement for low- achieving students and to enable the school to make adequate yearly progress (AYP) is addressed in the Goals and Objectives Section III. B. 10 percent of the school s Title I, Part A, allocation is allocated and used to provide high- quality professional development. This requirement is reflected in the School Categorical Funding And Proposed Expenditures Section IV. C. Other Program Improvement School Requirements: an X on the line certifies completion. _X_ The school provides annual written information to parents about the school s Program Improvement status. _X_ The school and LEA provide annual written information to parents about School Choice options. _X_ The school and LEA provide annual information to parents about Supplemental Educational Services. 49
51 SECTION III Local Control Funding Formula 8 STATE PRIORITIES PRIORITY 1: Basic PRIORITY 2: Implementation of State Standards PRIORITY 7: Course Access PRIORITY 4: Pupil Achievement PRIORITY 8: Other Pupil Outcomes PRIORITY 3: Parental Involvement PRIORITY 5: Pupil Engagement PRIORITY 6: School Climate Category A: Conditions of Learning Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject areas and for the pupils they are teaching; pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials and school facilities are maintained in good repair. Appropriate teacher assignment (e.g. HQT report, SARC)** Sufficient instructional materials (e.g. Board IM Resolution, SARC) Facilities in good repair (e.g. SARC) Implementation of academic content and performance standards adopted by the state board for all pupils. How the programs and services will enable students to access the common core academic content standards How the programs and services will enable English learners to access the common core academic content standards How the programs and services will enable English learners to access the English language development standards Pupil enrollment in a broad course of study that includes all of the subject areas. (e.g. English, Mathematics, Social Science, Science, Visual & Performing Arts, Health, Physical Education, Career & Technical Education, and other.) Category B: Pupil Outcomes Performance on standardized tests, score on Academic Performance Index, share of pupils that are college and career ready, share of English learners that become English proficient, English learner reclassification rate, share of pupils that pass Advanced Placement exams with a 3 or higher, and share of pupils determined prepared for college by the Early Assessment Program. Statewide assessment data (CST Science?, SBAC ) API ( ) College Readiness % of pupils completing A-G or CTE Sequences or ROP or Partnership Academies Language proficiency(celdt, ELPAC ) English learner reclassification rate % of pupils passing AP exam with score of 3 or higher % of pupils who participate in EAP % of pupils demonstrate college preparedness (EAP) Other (Dibels and/or Lexiles) Other (District Benchmarks) Other (Enrollment in Gate/Honors?) Pupil outcomes in the subject areas. (e.g. English, Mathematics, Social Science, Science, Visual & Performing Arts, Health, Physical Education, Career & Technical Education, and other.) Category C: Engagement Efforts to seek parent input in decision making, promotion of parent participation in programs for unduplicated pupils and special need subgroups. Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for each individual school site How the school district will promote parental participation in programs for: o Economically disadvantaged pupils o English learners o Foster youth o Individuals with exceptional needs School attendance rates, chronic absenteeism rates, middle school dropout rates, high school dropout rates, and high school graduation rates. Pupil suspension rates, pupil expulsion rates, other local measures including surveys of pupils, and parents and teachers on the sense of safety and school connectedness. (e.g. CHKS, PBIS, Locally developed student surveys, Parent Surveys, Teacher Culture Survey) 50
52 SECTION IV SCHOOL GOALS THIS SECTION CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING: STANDARDS BASED GOALS FOR IMPROVEMENT IN STUDENT PERFORMANCE SCHOOL GOALS FOR ADDRESSING THE DISTRICT LEA PLAN AND STRATEGIC PLAN DIRECTIONS FOR The school site council has analyzed the academic performance of all student groups and has considered the effectiveness of the instructional program for students failing to meet API (Simulation) and CST Benchmark (Simulation) growth targets. As a result, it has adopted the following school goals and action plans, relative to the LEA Plan, and the expenditures to implement the action plans in order to raise the academic performance of all student groups to Proficiency. 2. Professional development actions are addressed in the goals for improvement in student performance rather than addressed as a separate goal. Note: School goals are aligned to the LEA Plan. Action plans are developed to reach Full Implementation of the goals as defined by the CDE s Nine Essential Program Components (EPCs), the Academic Program Surveys, the District Assessment Survey, the English Learner Subgroup Self- Assessment, and the Inventory of Services and Supports for Students with Disabilities. The Action plans should be reachable and reasonable. Ongoing programs, practices, and strategies requiring Categorical funding should be included in the Proposed Expenditures Of Categorical Allocations (Section IV). (Goals and Action Plans Begin Here) School To Parent Communication 1) All School To Parent Communication will be duplicated with RoboCalls. 2) All Robo Calls will be promptly posted on the PTLAMS website ( 3) All Communication Avenues will be clearly made aware to All Parents and All Students within the Registration Packet and at the Beginning of the Year All School Meeting with Parents. 4) Purchase Electronic Marquee to be Displayed above the Front Door of the Main Entrance of the School. 5) Implement a RoboText School To Parent type communication. Reading, Writing, and Math Performance Support and Improvement 1) Purchase, Train, and Implement Accelerated Reader & Accelerated Math Online Program connected with ELA & Math Homework Accountability. ( (Cost / Quote = $14,081.00) 2) Purchase, Train, and Implement Step Up To Writing in ALL Content Areas, ALL Subject Matter Classes. ( (Cost / Quote = $11,560.41) Fully Purchased, Trained and Implemented (April 6, 2015) 3) Continue to cultivate / develop Journalism as a Period 8 Academic Elective Course along with Student Council, Yearbook, Coding, Robotics, Reading, Etc. (Students must be Academically Eligible to participate). 4) Establish an ELA Based Social / Political / Charitable / IB Learner Profile Character / Community Building Club. See Mr. King 5) Purchase, Train, and Implement Grammar & English Learner Program / Curriculum. Technology Inclusion Improvement Throughout ALL Content Areas / Subject Matters 1) Inquire from other relative / similar schools about Technology Inclusion and Technology Funding Strategies. 2) Seek Technology Partnerships (Business Partnerships) generated by Parent Involvement. ( ( See Ms. Downey 3) Purchase, Train, and Implement 1 to 1 ipads as a Technology Academic Tool. 4) Purchase and Implement 1 Class Set of 30 Computers on a Cart to be shared by only 2 Teachers / Classes as a Technology Academic Tool. 5) 51
53 THIS SECTION CONTAINS THE BUDGET PAGES: SECTION V SCHOOL CATEGORICAL FUNDING AND PROPOSED EXPENDITURES ESTIMATED CATEGORICAL ALLOCATIONS FOR YEAR PROPOSED EXPENDITURES OF CATEGORICAL ALLOCATIONS FOR TO MEET SCHOOL GOALS CATEGORICAL FUNDING ALLOCATED TO THIS SCHOOL The following state and federal categorical funds were allocated to this school through the Consolidated Application, Part II, to enable all students to meet state and local academic performance standards and growth targets. Additional funds (listed under Other ) may be allocated to the school in accordance with district policy and state allocations. Title I and EIA / SCE funds are to be used to to close the achievement gap between high- and low- performing students, especially between minority and non- minority students. (20 USC 6301) Fund and Purpose Federal Funds Title I: School- Wide Program: To improve student achievement and address achievement gap for at- risk students Amount $12, (SUTW) Title 1: Parent Involvement $6, Other Federal Funds (list and describe): $3, Fund and Purpose State Funds Economic Impact Aid/English Language Learner Program (EIA / LEP): To develop fluency in English and academic proficiency of English learners for at- risk students Economic Impact Aid/Student Compensatory Education (EIA / SCE): To improve student achievement and address achievement gap for at- risk students Amount of Allocation $15, (AR & AM) $15, Other State Funds (list and describe): $3,
54 PROPOSED SCHOOL CATEGORICAL EXPENDITURES On the Excel sheet provided, list the amounts to be spent on supplemental staff, materials, and equipment to achieve the improvement targets for this school. (Expenditures of categorical funds allocated to the school must be approved by the School Site Council.) (SEE INSERTED EXCEL SHEETS NEXT PAGES) CENTRALIZED SERVICES EXPENDITURES The following Excel sheet, provided by Academic Services / Special Programs, lists the services provided by district staff using categorical funds allocated through the Consolidated Application and by other means. At least 85% of all Consolidated Programs expenditures must be for direct services to students at school sites. (SEE INSERTED EXCEL SHEETS NEXT PAGES) 53
55 Quote for 6th & 7th Grade (243 students) AR & STAR Only 54
56 Quote for Grades 6 8 All Students All Programs 55
57 Step Up To Writing (SUTW) 56
58 57
59 Step Up To Writing (SUTW) 58
60 59
61 60
62 61
63 62
64 63
65 64
66 65
67 66
68 67
69 68
70 69
71 70
72 71
Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient
Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient Understanding Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient Decision Guide: Reclassifying a Student from
More informationIB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School
IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School Mission Statement San Jose High School (SJHS) is a diverse academic community of learners where we take pride and ownership of the international
More informationJohn F. Kennedy Middle School
John F. Kennedy Middle School CUPERTINO UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT Steven Hamm, Principal hamm_steven@cusdk8.org School Address: 821 Bubb Rd. Cupertino, CA 95014-4938 (408) 253-1525 CDS Code: 43-69419-6046890
More informationSummary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education
Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education Prepared for the Alameda County Board of Education November 10, 2015 Alameda County Office of Education Charter
More informationSunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2014-15 School Year Published During 2015-16 By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by
More informationShelters Elementary School
Shelters Elementary School August 2, 24 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER) which provides key information on the 23-24 educational progress for the Shelters
More informationEl Toro Elementary School
El Toro Elementary School 2013-14 Published During 2014-15 El Toro Elementary Contact Information (School Year 2014-15) 455 East Main Ave. Morgan Hill, CA 95037-3745 (408) 201-6380 Principal: Contact E-mail
More informationStatus of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine
Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine The figures and tables below are based upon the latest publicly available data from AAMC, NSF, Department of Education and the US Census Bureau.
More informationData Diskette & CD ROM
Data File Format Data Diskette & CD ROM Texas Assessment of Academic Skills Fall 2002 through Summer 2003 Exit Level Test Administrations Attention Macintosh Users To accommodate Macintosh systems a delimiter
More informationAligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent
Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent 1 Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Student Purpose:
More informationDyer-Kelly Elementary 1
San Juan Unified School Dyer-Kelly Elementary School 2008-2009 School Accountability Report Card Deborah Wegsteen, Principal School Address: 2236 Edison Ave. Sacramento, CA 95821-1607 916-566-2150 Dr.
More informationThe Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends
The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends Kelcey Edwards & Ellen Sawtell AP Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV July 19, 2013 Exploring the Data Hispanic/Latino US public school graduates The Demographic
More informationTransportation Equity Analysis
2015-16 Transportation Equity Analysis Each year the Seattle Public Schools updates the Transportation Service Standards and bus walk zone boundaries for use in the upcoming school year. For the 2014-15
More informationLos Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page
Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan Signature Page Los Angeles Community College Los Angeles City College President, Board of Trustees Date District Chancellor: College President: Academic Senate
More informationRAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI
RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI Agenda Introductions Definitions History of the work Strategies Next steps Debrief
More informationComing in. Coming in. Coming in
212-213 Report Card for Glenville High School SCHOOL DISTRICT District results under review by the Ohio Department of Education based upon 211 findings by the Auditor of State. Achievement This grade combines
More informationIowa School District Profiles. Le Mars
Iowa School District Profiles Overview This profile describes enrollment trends, student performance, income levels, population, and other characteristics of the public school district. The report utilizes
More informationDr. Russell Johnson Middle School
Dr. Russell Johnson Middle Serving Grades Six through Eight 13603 Edwards Street Westminster, CA 92683 (714) 894-7244 www.jmswarriors.com Principal Heidi DeBritton Westminster High Academic Achievement,
More informationKansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance
Kansas State Department of Education Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance Based on Elementary & Secondary Education Act, No Child Left Behind (P.L. 107-110) Revised May 2010 Revised May
More informationKahului Elementary School
Kahului Elementary Code: 405 Status and Improvement Report Year 2014-15 Focus On Standards Grades K-5 Focus on Standards Description Contents Setting Student Profile Community Profile Improvement Summary
More informationAn Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District
An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District Report Submitted June 20, 2012, to Willis D. Hawley, Ph.D., Special
More informationThe Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement
The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement Eva L. Baker, EdD - University of California, Los Angeles, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing
More informationSuperintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review
Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review January 10, 2012 Thelma Meléndez de Santa Ana, Ph.D. Superintendent 2 The 100-Day Entry Plan Roll-Out What We ll Cover Reflections & Observations on Our Aha!
More informationCooper Upper Elementary School
LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS www.livoniapublicschools.org/cooper 213-214 BOARD OF EDUCATION 213-14 Mark Johnson, President Colleen Burton, Vice President Dianne Laura, Secretary Tammy Bonifield, Trustee Dan
More informationREADY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE
READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE Michal Kurlaender University of California, Davis Policy Analysis for California Education March 16, 2012 This research
More informationEDUCATING TEACHERS FOR CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY: A MODEL FOR ALL TEACHERS
New York State Association for Bilingual Education Journal v9 p1-6, Summer 1994 EDUCATING TEACHERS FOR CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY: A MODEL FOR ALL TEACHERS JoAnn Parla Abstract: Given changing demographics,
More informationGeorge A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During
George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2015-16 School Year Published During 2016-17 By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required
More informationExecutive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence
Forrest City School District Mrs. Shirley Taylor, Principal 149 Water Street Forrest City, AR 72335 Document Generated On February 26, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the School 2
More informationInternational Baccalaureate (IB) Primary Years Programme (PYP) at Northeast Elementary
International Baccalaureate (IB) Primary Years Programme (PYP) at Northeast Elementary Michael Clow, Principal Bill Parker, IB Coordinator Northeast Elementary School was designated an International Baccalaureate
More informationStudent Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation
Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist and Bethany L. McCaffrey, Ph.D., Interim Director of Research and Evaluation Evaluation
More informationPsychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability
August 2012 Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability Linking Measures of Academic Progress in Mathematics and Maryland School Assessment in Mathematics Huafang Zhao, Ph.D. This brief
More informationJohn F. Kennedy Junior High School
John F. Kennedy Junior High 2010-2011 Accountability Report Card Jason Strickland, Principal Address: 1000 East Florinda Street Hanford, CA 93232 559.585.3850 Hanford Elementary Paul J. Terry, Superintendent
More informationEducational Attainment
A Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile of Allen County, Indiana based on the 2010 Census and the American Community Survey Educational Attainment A Review of Census Data Related to the Educational Attainment
More informationCooper Upper Elementary School
LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS http://cooper.livoniapublicschools.org 215-216 Annual Education Report BOARD OF EDUCATION 215-16 Colleen Burton, President Dianne Laura, Vice President Tammy Bonifield, Secretary
More informationInstitution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research
Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research Standard 1.B.3 states: The institution establishes institution-set standards for student
More informationArthur E. Wright Middle School 1
A.E. Wright Middle School 4029 N. Las Virgenes Road, Calabasas, CA 91302 (818) 880-4614 Fax (818) 878-0453 Serving Grades Six through Eight CDS Code: 19-64683-6014781 aewrightmiddleschool.net Elias Miles,
More informationMalcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal
Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA 94703 (510) 644-6313 Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal alexanderhunt@berkeley.net 2012-13 School Accountability Report Card Published During
More informationPort Graham El/High. Report Card for
School: District: Kenai Peninsula Grades: K - 12 School Enrollment: 20 Title I School? No Title 1 Program: Accreditation: Report Card for 2008-2009 A Title 1 school receives federal money in support low-achieving
More informationRunning Head GAPSS PART A 1
Running Head GAPSS PART A 1 Current Reality and GAPSS Assignment Carole Bevis PL & Technology Innovation (ITEC 7460) Kennesaw State University Ed.S. Instructional Technology, Spring 2014 GAPSS PART A 2
More information5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity
5 Programmatic Equity It is one thing to take as a given that approximately 70 percent of an entering high school freshman class will not attend college, but to assign a particular child to a curriculum
More informationFostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education
Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education Laura I Rendón Professor Emerita University of Texas-San Antonio Presentation at NTCC 22 nd Annual Fall Leadership Conference Gainsesville, TX September
More informationSan Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During
San Luis Coastal Unified School District Grade 7 through Grade 8 Kyle Pruitt, Ph.D. - Principal E-mail: kpruitt@slcusd.org 1555 El Moro Road Los Osos, CA 93402 Phone: (805) 534-2835 Fax: (805) 528-5133
More informationDyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During
Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2014-15 School Year Published During 2015-16 By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required
More informationFeIL'1 Enactment Date:,2- io - ( C By: ----;1 >( DATE: February 10,2009!/
OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Office ofthe Superintendent 1025 Second Avenue, Room 30 I Oakland, CA 94006 Phone (510) 879-8200 Fax (510) 879-8800 TO: FROM: Anth Davi Legislative File File 10 No.:_ 09-
More informationEngage Educate Empower
Engage Educate Empower John F. Kennedy High School B Engage Educate Empower John F. Kennedy High School C Engage Educate Empower JFK Approved AP Courses Subject 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Biology
More informationUniversity of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes
University of Utah FRESHMAN-COHORT GRADUATION RATES All Students Student-Athletes # 2009-10 Graduation Rate 64% 64% Four-Class Average 61% 64% Student-Athlete Graduation Success Rate 87% 1. Graduation-Rates
More informationSchool Performance Plan Middle Schools
SY 2012-2013 School Performance Plan Middle Schools 734 Middle ALternative Program @ Lombard, Principal Roger Shaw (Interim), Executive Director, Network Facilitator PLEASE REFER TO THE SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
More informationClark Lane Middle School
152-51 STRATEGIC SCHOOL PROFILE 2010-11 Middle and Junior High School Edition Clark Lane Middle School Waterford School District MICHAEL LOVETERE, Principal LYNN M. LYNCH, Asst. Principal Telephone: (860)
More informationExecutive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School
Flagler County School District Dr. TC Culver, Principal 5545 Belle Terre Pkwy Palm Coast, FL 32137-3847 Document Generated On February 6, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the School
More informationCAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.
CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS Freshmen are defined here as all domestic students entering in fall quarter from high school. These statistics include information drawn from records available at UC Davis.
More informationPUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY
CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA Landscape Architecture College of Environmental Design PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY Landscape Architecture Accreditation Board (LAAB) accredited programs are
More informationInstitution of Higher Education Demographic Survey
Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey Data from all participating institutions are aggregated for the comparative studies by various types of institutional characteristics. For that purpose,
More informationTime Task Calendar SECONDARY
~February, 2008~ Distribute T.A. Certification Forms Attend training for Master Plan Program Survey EL Coordinator Meeting 2/14/08 ELAC Meeting 2/21/08 CELDT scores downloaded Review CL19 for accuracy
More informationMiami-Dade County Public Schools
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND THEIR ACADEMIC PROGRESS: 2010-2011 Author: Aleksandr Shneyderman, Ed.D. January 2012 Research Services Office of Assessment, Research, and Data Analysis 1450 NE Second Avenue,
More informationArlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5
GOAL 1: Professional Development Arlington Elementary School will implement an effective, cohesive and sustainable professional development model that maximizes the conditions of learning for all students.
More informationAnnual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent
Annual Report to the Public Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent 1 Conway Board of Education Ms. Susan McNabb Mr. Bill Clements Mr. Chuck Shipp Mr. Carl Barger Dr. Adam Lamey Dr. Quentin Washispack Mr. Andre
More informationExecutive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School
Miami-Dade County Public Schools Dr. Louis Algaze, Principal 11700 Hialeah Gardens Blvd Hialeah Gardens, FL 33018 Document Generated On March 19, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the
More informationWhat Does ESSA Mean for English Learners and #ESSAforELs
What Does ESSA Mean for English Learners and Accountability? @EdPolicyAIR #ESSAforELs English Learner Reclassification Joseph P. Robinson-Cimpian, Ph.D. Associate Professor and College of Education Distinguished
More informationOmak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan
Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan 2015-2016 Vision Omak School District is committed to success for all students and provides a wide range of high quality instructional programs and
More informationCDS Code
THE SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AT CLAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2017-18 37-68338-6039390 CDS Code This is a plan of actions to be taken to raise the academic performance of students and improve the school
More informationHistory. 344 History. Program Student Learning Outcomes. Faculty and Offices. Degrees Awarded. A.A. Degree: History. College Requirements
344 History History History is the disciplined study of the human past. Santa Barbara City College offers a varied and integrated curriculum in history. For the major, the History Department provides the
More informationSMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application
ONLINE POST-BABACCALAUREATE TEACHER PREPARATION PROGRAM SMILE yce Scholars Program Application Introduction: Rio Salado College is soliciting applicants for the Science and Math Innovative Learning Environments
More informationA Diverse Student Body
A Diverse Student Body No two diversity plans are alike, even when expressing the importance of having students from diverse backgrounds. A top-tier school that attracts outstanding students uses this
More informationCLINTON-MACOMB PUBLIC LIBRARY STRATEGIC PLAN
CLINTON-MACOMB PUBLIC LIBRARY STRATEGIC PLAN 2018-2020 INSPIRE. CREATE. DREAM. LEARN. OUR MISSION Ensure CMPL is valued as an essential community service by focusing on the following strategic priorities:
More informationWisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Main takeaways from the 2015 NAEP 4 th grade reading exam: Wisconsin scores have been statistically flat
More informationIva Meairs Elementary School
Serving Grades Kindergarten through Five 8441 Trask Avenue Garden Grove, CA 92844 (714) 638-0450 Principal Tricia Urbaniec Westminster School High Academic Achievement for All Students www.wsd.k12.ca.us
More informationDyer-Kelly Elementary 1
DyerKelly Elementary 0910 Accountability Report Card Deborah Wegsteen, Principal Address: 2236 Edison Ave. Sacramento, CA 95821 9165662150 San Juan Unified Dr. Pat Jaurequi, Superintendent Address: 3738
More informationDesert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT
SELF-STUDY REPORT Submitted to the Western Association of Schools and Colleges 104 Magnolia Street Brawley, CA 92227 Brawley Union High School District March 20-22, 2017 Brawley Union High School District
More informationHokulani Elementary School
Hokulani Elementary Code: 109 Status and Improvement Report Year -11 Contents Focus On Standards Grades K-5 This Status and Improvement Report has been prepared as part of the Department's education accountability
More informationMark Keppel High School
SELF-STUDY VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Report WESTERN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FOR 501 Hellman Avenue Alhambra, CA 91801 Alhambra
More informationFile Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10
Success - Key Measures Graduation Rate: 4-, 5-, and 6-Year 9. First-time, full-time entering, degree-seeking, students enrolled in a minimum of 12 SCH their first fall semester who have graduated from
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest, ILLINOIS 2 8 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year.
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST, ILLINOIS and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. 2 7 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
More informationCSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment
CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment 2015 CAASPP EAP Testing 3.2 million students tested in grades 3-11.
More informationA Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education
A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education Note: Additional information regarding AYP Results from 2003 through 2007 including a listing of each individual
More informationKENT STATE UNIVERSITY
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY Regents STARTALK Teacher Leadership Academy: Chinese, Russian Director: Brian J. Baer / Co-director: Theresa A. Minick Program Dates: Thursday, July 7 - Saturday, July 16 Summer 2016
More information46 Children s Defense Fund
Nationally, about 1 in 15 teens ages 16 to 19 is a dropout. Fewer than two-thirds of 9 th graders in Florida, Georgia, Louisiana and Nevada graduate from high school within four years with a regular diploma.
More informationDr. Russell Johnson Middle School
Serving Grades Six through Eight 13603 Edwards Street Westminster, CA 92683 (714) 894-7244 www.jmswarriors.com Principal Heidi DeBritton Vice Principal Robert McKane Westminster School High Academic Achievement
More informationJob Description: PYP Co-ordinator
Job Description: PYP Co-ordinator Nexus International School, Singapore Purchased by Taylor s Education Group in July 2011, NISS currently meets the educational needs of almost 600 students from approximately
More informationWorld s Best Workforce Plan
2017-18 World s Best Workforce Plan District or Charter Name: PiM Arts High School, 4110-07 Contact Person Name and Position Matt McFarlane, Executive Director In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section
More informationSCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School
Mission Statement The mission of is to offer all students the opportunity to demonstrate independence, self- motivation, and responsibility for self and others. Provided with a safe learning environment
More informationCollege and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent Making Education Work for All of Georgia s Students College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12 CONTENT MASTERY (END of COURSE TESTS
More informationEDELINA M. BURCIAGA 3151 Social Science Plaza Irvine, CA
EDELINA M. BURCIAGA 3151 Social Science Plaza Irvine, CA 92697-5000 eburciag@uci.edu EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE, Irvine, CA Doctoral candidate, Department of Sociology. Expected graduation
More informationDeer Valley High School WASC MID CYCLE REPORT
Deer Valley High School WASC MID CYCLE REPORT 2016-2017 DEER VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL MID CYCLE REPORT 4700 Lone Tree Way Antioch, CA 94531 Antioch Unified School District February 27, 2017 March 1, 2017 Accrediting
More informationCupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cupertino High Kami Tomberlain, Principal Address: 10100 Finch Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 408-366-7300 FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 2010-2011 Accountabiltiy Report Card Profile Cupertino is a four-year
More informationDO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION
DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION The Coalition for Asian American Children and Families (CACF) is
More informationExecutive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501
Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501 Document Generated On November 3, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the School System 2 System's Purpose 4 Notable
More informationUnequal Opportunity in Environmental Education: Environmental Education Programs and Funding at Contra Costa Secondary Schools.
Unequal Opportunity in Environmental Education: Environmental Education Programs and Funding at Contra Costa Secondary Schools Angela Freitas Abstract Unequal opportunity in education threatens to deprive
More informationSTAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress
Beverly Hills Unified School District E l Rodeo S c h o o l Annual School Accountability Report Card A Report of Activity Published in January 2014 School Grades K-8 David Hoffman, Principal 605 North
More informationINTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT
Effective 2015-2016 school year only INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT The Kenston Board of Education shall permit the enrollment of students from any Ohio district in a school or program in this district,
More informationSchool Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year
El Toro High School 25255 Toledo Way Lake Forest CA, 92630 (949) 586-6333 Grades 9-12 Terri Gusiff, Principal Terri.Gusiff@svusd.org www.schools@svusd.org 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card Published
More informationSpanish Users and Their Participation in College: The Case of Indiana
and Their Participation in College: The Case of Indiana CAROLINA PELAEZ-MORALES Purdue University Spanish has become a widely used second language in the U.S. As the number of Spanish users (SUs) continues
More informationDenver Public Schools
2017 Candidate Surveys Denver Public Schools Denver School Board District 4: Northeast DPS District 4 - Introduction School board elections offer community members the opportunity to reflect on the state
More informationHale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School
Comprehensive Assessment and Accountability System Year 1999-2000 Hale`iwa Elementary Grades K-6 Focus on Description Context: Setting Student Community Process: Process: Certified Facilities Outcomes:
More informationLocal Educational Agency California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Student Data File Layout
Local Educational Agency California Assessment of Student 2015 16 Student Data File Layout Results for the following: Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for English Language Arts/Literacy and California
More informationTrends & Issues Report
Trends & Issues Report prepared by David Piercy & Marilyn Clotz Key Enrollment & Demographic Trends Options Identified by the Eight Focus Groups General Themes 4J Eugene School District 4J Eugene, Oregon
More informationExecutive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY
Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY 40741-1222 Document Generated On January 13, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the School System 2 System's Purpose 4 Notable
More informationHumanitas A. San Fernando High School. Smaller Learning Community Plan. Azucena Hernandez, Redesign Team. Bob Stromoski, Redesign Team
San Fernando High School Smaller Learning Community Plan Humanitas A Submitted by: Frank O Connor, Lead Teacher Mike Boemker, Redesign Team Carmen Fisher, Redesign Team Approved by School Site Council:
More informationBella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During
Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2014-15 School Year Published During 2015-16 By February 1 of each year, Every school in California is required by
More informationLied Scottsbluff Public Library Strategic Plan
Lied Scottsbluff Public Library 2015 2018 Strategic Plan Purpose Statement: Strategic plans are used to communicate an organization s goals and the strategies needed to achieve these goals. Through the
More information