Areas to investigate. Writing progress was in the top quintile (20%) for at least two years

Transcription

1 Primary A Inspection Data Summary Report Areas to investigate KS2 progress Reading progress was in the top quintile (2%) for at least two years for all pupils, middle prior attainers and disadvantaged pupils. Writing progress was in the top quintile (2%) for at least two years for all pupils, middle prior attainers and high prior attainers. Mathematics progress was in the top quintile (2%) for at least two years for all pupils and middle prior attainers. Progress in writing was significantly above average and in the highest 1%. KS2 attainment In 218, reading, writing and mathematics attainment of the expected standard was at or above national for prior attainment groups: middle, high. In 218, 87% of pupils achieved the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics, 23 percentage points above the national proportion. This was a statistically significant difference. The three-year average reading attainment score (18.3) was in the top 1%. The three-year average mathematics attainment score (17.) was in the top 1%. KS1 attainment There were no meaningful trends or differences for this measure. Phonics in 218 The average mark for pupils not meeting the phonics expected standard in year 1 was 18. Notes: The majority of areas to investigate will not appear for small cohorts, and some are based on data not contained in this report. Progress measures are based on adjusted progress scores. Page 1

2 Primary A Inspection Data Summary Report Areas to investigate Behaviour There were no permanent exclusions in the last three years. The national average in each of these years was zero. In 216/17, there were no fixed term exclusions. The national average rate for schools with a similar level of deprivation was.38%. In 216/17, there were no repeat exclusions. The national average rate for schools with a similar level of deprivation was.18%. Notes: The majority of areas to investigate will not appear for small cohorts, and some are based on data not contained in this report. Progress measures are based on adjusted progress scores. Page 2

3 Primary S Inspection Data Summary Report School context in 218 Phase of education: Primary Headteacher: Bill James Pupils: 48 Gender: Mixed Deprivation Quintile: Lowest 4% (.1) Ethnicity Local authority: Hampshire Admissions policy: Not applicable Ages: 4-11 Denomination: Roman Catholic Special needs provision: The largest ethnic groups are: White - British (63.1%), White - any other White background (12.%), Asian or Asian British - Indian (6.7%), Asian or Asian British - any other Asian background (3.9%),Black or Black British - African (4.6%). This school has 14 out of 17 possible ethnic groups. The average number of groups for this phase of education is 9. Number on roll Girls The school was in the top 2% of all schools for the number of pupils (48). The percentage of girls in year 1 (8%) and year 2 (6%) was higher than all other year groups. Ever 6 FSM %: 7. English additional language %: 19.8 SEN support %: 24. SEN with EHC plan %: 1.2 The percentage of girls in year 3 (4%) was lower than all other year groups. The school was in the lowest 2% of all schools for the proportion of FSM (7.%). There were no children looked after in the school. English as an Additional Language There was nothing significant to report for this group. Notes: Context sentences provide background information for inspectors. This is historic data for pupils as of the January 218 census. For example year in 218 is the school s current year 6 cohort. Ethnicity and CLA sentences appear for every school. For further information on methodology see Page 3

4 Primary S Inspection Data Summary Report School context 218 Special Educational Needs The school was in the top 2% of all schools for the proportion of SEN support (24.%). The percentage of SEN in year 1 (4%) was higher than all other year groups. The percentage of SEN in year (21%) was lower than all other year groups. Prior Attainment Pupil prior attainment was well above the national comparator for the following: Reading (year 4), Mathematics (year 4) Notes: Context sentences provide background information for inspectors. This is historic data for pupils as of the January 218 census. For example year in 218 is the school s current year 6 cohort. Ethnicity and CLA sentences appear for every school. For further information on methodology see Page 4

5 Key Relative stage 2 Relative progress for the past three years Progress quintiles based on rank of progress score () Cohort Significantly above national Significantly below national Reading Bottom 2% Top 2% Q Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Writing Bottom 2% Top 2% Q Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Mathematics Bottom 2% Top 2% Q Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Overall 216 (66) Overall 217 (68) Overll 218 (69) Low at KS1 216 (6) Low at KS1 217 () Low at KS1 218 (4) Middle at KS1 216 (36) Middle at KS1 217 (37) Middle at KS1 218 (3) High at KS1 216 (24) High at KS1 217 (26) High at KS1 218 (3) 216 (11) 217 (7) 218 (6) (66) (68) (69) (6) () (4) (36) (37) (3) (24) (26) (3) (11) (7) (6) (66) (68) (69) (6) () (4) (36) (37) (3) (24) (26) (3) (11) (7) (6) Notes: Statistical significance for disadvantaged pupils is against the national for other pupils. Change in methodology or calculations is indicated by a dotted line. Quintiles for 218 are based on adjusted progress scores. Previous years are based on unadjusted. Significance is only flagged for cohorts greater than 1. For cohorts of 1 or less information is greyed out. For further information on methodology see Page

6 Key Reading stage 2 Reading progress in 218 Reading progress scatterplot Bottom 1% Top 1% Other national Significantly above national and in top 1% Significantly below national and in bottom 1% Other SEN Not SEN Low at KS1 Middle at KS1 High at KS Progress National...../.3 Number of pupils included Number of adjusted pupils Key stage 2 progress Below average Above average National -11 Average progress 11 Note: nationals are shown as all/other Key stage 1 prior attainment 2 Notes: Progress measures are based on adjusted progress scores. Significance is only flagged for cohorts greater than 1. For cohorts of 1 or fewer, information is shown in grey. Prior attainment is based on overall KS1 attainment. For further information on methodology see Page 6

7 Key Writing stage 2 Writing progress in 218 Writing progress scatterplot Bottom 1% Top 1% Other national Significantly above national and in top 1% Significantly below national and in bottom 1% Other SEN Not SEN Low at KS1 Middle at KS1 High at KS1-1 1 Progress National...../.2 Number of pupils included Number of adjusted pupils Key stage 2 progress Below average Above average National -1 Average progress 1 Note: nationals are shown as all/other Key stage 1 prior attainment 2 Notes: Progress measures are based on adjusted progress scores. Significance is only flagged for cohorts greater than 1. For cohorts of 1 or fewer, information is shown in grey. Prior attainment is based on overall KS1 attainment. For further information on methodology see Page 7

8 Key Mathematics stage 2 Mathematics progress in 218 Mathematics progress scatterplot Bottom 1% Top 1% Other national Significantly above national and in top 1% Significantly below national and in bottom 1% Other SEN Not SEN Low at KS1 Middle at KS1 High at KS1-9 9 Progress National...../.3 Number of pupils included Number of adjusted pupils Key stage 2 progress Below average Above average National -9 Average progress 9 Note: nationals are shown as all/other Key stage 1 prior attainment 2 Notes: Progress measures are based on adjusted progress scores. Significance is only flagged for cohorts greater than 1. For cohorts of 1 or fewer, information is shown in grey. Prior attainment is based on overall KS1 attainment. For further information on methodology see Page 8

9 Key R stage 2 in 218 Reading scaled scores 218 This chart shows the distribution of total marks achieved by pupils in the school compared to the national. National level Not achieved expected standard Achieved expected standard Cohort = 7 One pupil relates to 1.4 percentage points. In 218, 93% of pupils achieved the expected standard, 18 percentage points above the national. This was a statistically significant difference Number of pupils Expected standard Reading scaled score Notes: The plotted national line is the national reading percentage multiplied by the school reading attainment cohort at each average scaled score interval. For further information on methodology see Page 9

10 Key M stage 2 in 218 Mathematics scaled scores 218 This chart shows the distribution of total marks achieved by pupils in the school compared to the national. National level Not achieved expected standard Achieved expected standard Cohort = 7 One pupil relates to 1.4 percentage points. In 218, 93% of pupils achieved the expected standard, 17 percentage points above the national. This was a statistically significant difference Number of pupils Expected standard Mathematics scaled score Notes: The plotted national line is the national mathematics percentage multiplied by the school mathematics attainment cohort at each average scaled score interval. For further information on methodology see Page 1

11 Key stage 1 in 218 Reading Writing Expected+ % Greater depth % National for all pupils Other national Expected+ % Greater depth % National for all pupils Other national % diff Diff No Cohort % diff Diff No Cohort /-39-26/-29-1/-1-1/-1-3/-34-16/-18-1/-1 / 2 Mathematics Science Expected+ % Greater depth % National for all pupils Other national Expected+ % National for all pupils Other national % diff 8 11 Diff No 7 Cohort % diff 2-23/-26 Diff No 1-1/-1 Cohort 7-36/-4-22/-2-1/-1-1/ Note: 'Diff no' value shows the number of pupils that the difference between school and national represents, and is always rounded down to a whole number. nationals are shown as all/other (other relates to pupils who are not defined as disadvantaged). For science the only outcome of the teacher assessment was whether pupils met the expected standard. For further information on methodology see Page 11

12 Phonics Y in 218 Year 1 phonics marks 218 This chart shows the distribution of total marks achieved by pupils in the school compared to the national. National level Not achieved expected standard Achieved expected standard Cohort = 62 One pupil relates to 1.6 percentage points. In 218, 82% of pupils achieved the expected standard, in line with the national proportion. 7 6 Number of pupils Expected standard Total marks gained Notes: The plotted national line is the national phonics attainment percentage at each phonics mark multiplied by the whole school phonics attainment cohort. The expected standard for phonics is 32+. For further information on methodology see Page 12