Developing a Game Plan to Meet the CCRPI Challenge. Bobby Smith

Transcription

1 Developing a Game Plan to Meet the CCRPI Challenge Bobby Smith bobbysmith2020@outlook.com

2 entcode=cpresa Show Files

3 1. Redeliver this presentation -- in small chunks -- to your leadership team. 2. Make connections to TKES (and LKES). 3. Push understanding of the categories, indicators, and scoring to the teacher level. 4. Engage them with the spreadsheets. 5. Charge SLT members with redelivering the presentation and spreadsheets to the staff. 6. Use your staff as ambassadors of information to the outside stakeholders.

4 CCRPI Performance Categories Achievement Points (50 pts) Challenge Points (10 pts) Content Mastery (Wt. GMAS) 20 pts Post School Readiness 15 pts Graduation Predictor 15 pts Progress Points (SGPs 35) 40 pts Achievement GAP (Lowest Quartile) 10 pts ED/EL/SWD Performance Flags (Wt. GMAS) Exceeding the Bar Indicators

5 Content Mastery (Wt. GMAS) 20 pts Achievement Points (50 pts) Post School Readiness 15 pts CCRPI Performance Categories Graduation Predictor 15 pts Progress Points (SGPs 35) 40 pts Achievement GAP (Lowest Quartile) 10 pts Challenge Points (10 pts) ED/EL/SWD Performance Flags (Wt. GMAS) Exceeding the Bar Indicators A 90 Second Overview What actions, strategies, practices, initiatives, programs, or interventions are we using to impact each category?

6 The CCRPI Over Time 2017?

7 2016 Elementary School College & Career Ready Performance Index 20 (40% of 50 Points) (30% of 50 Points) (30% of 50 Points)

8 2016 Middle School College & Career Ready Performance Index

9 2016 High School College & Career Ready Performance Index

10 Content Mastery (Tests) (21 pts) FAY CCRPI Performance Categories Achievement Points (50 pts) Progress Readiness (15 pts) Graduation (15 pts) Points (SGPs) (40 pts) Achievement Gap (10 pts) Challenge Points (10 pts) ED/EL/SWD Performance (Flags) FAY FAY FAY FAY Exceeding the Bar Indicators

11 CCRPI Changes

12 High School Indicator Changes Year Indicators ETBs * ** 9** *Writing Assessment Indicator removed. **Work-based learning/capstone/ib Project moved from ETB Section to Face indicators.

13 Middle School Indicator Changes Year Indicators ETBs * *Top students taking Algebra and Physical Science EOCs count in 2016.

14 Elementary Indicator Changes Year Indicators ETBs * 6* *Indicator on 5 th Grade Career Portfolios moved from ETB Section to the Face Indicators.

15 HS/MS/ES Progress Points based only on ELA & Math (SGPs 35 and higher) Achievement Gap Points based only on ELA & Math

16 ES/MS 20 Content Mastery Points 15 points for ELA & Math 5 points for Science and SS

17 Proposed 2017 Content Mastery Scoring for Elementary and Middle. (Effect of Senate Bill 364)

18 Assessment/Accountability/Pages/default.aspx

19 Indicator Scoring Details Indicator Scoring with benchmark at 100% Indicator Scoring with benchmark <100% Attendance Indicator Scoring

20 Lexile Calculations and Improvement

21 Category Comparison and Improvement

22 Indicator Comparison and Improvement

23 Data Analysis: A fact finding event Not a fault finding event

24 Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts.

25 Power Strategies for Milestones and CCRPI Good readers and writers will rule the earth. Perform data analysis to identify greatest areas of need (low hanging fruit). Review strategies in your current SIP to see if the greatest areas of need are addressed. Design new strategies to address greatest areas of need. Code CCRPI Indicators into your SIP. Remember that the big problems require K-12 solutions. Progress monitor key CCRPI metrics. Celebrate whenever possible.

26 Drilling for the WHO and the WHAT WHO? Student Groups WHAT? Content Domains 26

27 Domain Performance Fifth Grade Social Studies Domains % of Test History 50% Geography 15% Government/Civics 20% Economics 15%

28 U. S. History Domain Performance Domains % of Test Colonization through the Constitution 20% New Republic through Reconstruction 20% Industrialization, Reform, and Imperialism 15% Establishment as a World Power 20% Modern Era 25%

29 Root Cause Analysis Issues Some investigators stop at symptoms rather than going on to deeper level root causes. The current knowledge of investigators may limit results because they cannot find causes that they do not already know. A facilitator may be needed to ask the right questions. Different investigators may come up with different causes for the same problem. Some investigators tend to focus on a single root cause -- whereas each question could elicit several different root causes. In most cases processes, rather than people, are the problem.

30 Leadership Team work at a Mid-Year Data Retreat 1. Review current SIP strategies using Green light, Yellow light, & Red light to assess effectiveness. 2. Analyze 2015 CCRPI data, down to the component & indicator levels. 3. Analyze 2016 CCRPI data, down to the component & indicator levels. 4. Benchmark the 2016 CCRPI results to an average or A school. 5. Analyze the 2015 Milestones Content Area Summaries down to the domain level. 6. Analyze the 2016 Milestones Content Area Summaries down to the domain level.

31 Leadership Team work at a Mid-Year Data Retreat 7. Analyze the writing scores of the 2015 & 2016 ELA Milestones 8. Analyze 2016 Climate Star data and compare to Analyze Median SGP data from SLDS for 2015 and Review other data from local assessments for Check 2017 data that counts in CCRPI for accuracy (Grad Rate, Work-based learning, attendance, discipline, etc.) 12. Engage SLTs to answer Key Questions.

32 If all teachers are effective, what accounts for poor domain performance and the lack of growth? Is lack of time spend on the domain a factor? Are the tested standards being taught? Do local tests match state tests in rigor? What is the quality of lessons/units? Do teachers have access to quality resources? Are students familiar with the test format?

33 Needed for Mid-Year Data Retreat Content Area Summaries CCRPI Reports Data Details Spreadsheets Median SGPs from Ga SG Model GOSA Tool Local Assessment Results Other Data/GaDOE Resources

34 Improving CCRPI Performance Perform data analysis to identify greatest areas of need (low hanging fruit). Review strategies in your current SIP to see if the greatest areas of need are addressed. Begin to design new strategies to address greatest areas of need. Remember that the big problems require K-12 solutions. Establish leading indicators for monitoring. Celebrate whenever possible.

35 Improving CCRPI Performance Attack weak domains. Tweak pacing guides. Improve instructional resources. Analyze local assessments. Familiarize students with the format. Use GaDOE/RESA Resources. Encourage healthy competition. Be positive with students.

36

37 What is your school s strongest performance category on the CCRPI? What is your school s weakest performance category on the CCRPI? Content Mastery Post School Readiness Predictor for Graduation Progress Achievement Gap

38 What are your school s strongest indicators on the CCRPI? What are your school s weakest indicators on the CCRPI?

39 What is your school s strongest content area in the Progress Category? What are your school s weakest content area in the Progress Category?

40 What is your school s strongest content area in the Achievement Gap Category? What are your school s weakest content area in the Achievement Gap Category?

41 What is your school s strongest content area in the Flag section? What are your school s weakest content area in the Flag section? What is your school s highest performing subgroup in the Flag section? What is your school s lowest performing subgroup in the Flag section?

42 What is your school s strongest Area in the Climate Stars? What is your school s weakest Area in the Climate Stars? What do the results of the student, staff, and parent surveys say about your school?

43 Do all of your instructional staff members know the answers to all of the previous questions?

44 Background on Student Growth Percentiles Students obtain growth percentiles, ranging from 1 to 99, which indicate how their current achievement compares with that of their statewide academic peers who had similar score histories.

45

46 Student Test Scores Converted to Student Growth Percentiles Test Scores SGPs

47 Three Different SGPs SGPs SLDS Median (Middle) SGPs TEM & LEM Mean (Average) SGPs CCRPI % 35 and Above

48 Levels of Growth for Students SGP Ranges Type of Growth 1-34 Low Growth Typical Growth High Growth

49 Drilling into SGPs

50 SGPs 35 or Higher By Content Area 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percent of SGPs 35 or Higher 56% 49% 49% 38% ELA Math Science SS

51 % Meets & Exceeds 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Higher Achievement Lower Growth Higher Achievement Higher Growth 10% Lower Achievement Lower Growth Median Student Growth Percentile Lower Achievement Higher Growth 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

52 Achievement Gap (10 Points) Two Ways Points Are Calculated: Compares the average of a school s lowest quartile to the state average. Compares how much the students in the lowest quartile have grown in the last year. Schools get credit for the higher of the two calculations.

53 CCRPI Needs Built into SIP SMART Goal: Increase graduation rates for subgroups by designated percentages shown in Appendix A. Actions, Strategies, Interventions 1. Implement extra learning time for struggling seniors (CCRPI 16-17) a) Zero Block -- Before school tutoring b) Fifth Block -- After school tutoring c) SOS Program (Save Our Seniors) Tutoring during lunch 2. Implement differentiation/udl (TAPS #4)

54 CCRPI Needs Built into SIP SMART Goal: Increase by 5% the number of students who miss fewer than 6 days per year. (CCRPI #10; Climate Stars-Attendance) Actions, Strategies, Interventions Individual classroom incentives School-wide recognition Parent communication Counselor phone calls after 3 absences Consistent procedures and use of district attendance protocol Student recognition for perfect attendance in a grading period Perfect attendance group photos hung in a visible location Grade level competition displayed on lunchroom wall

55 CCRPI Needs Built into SIP SMART Goal: Increase by 5% the percentage of students achieving Lexile targets. (CCRPI #7 and #8) Actions, Strategies, Interventions Establish personal Lexile goals Implementation and utilization of PLCs to study Lexiles/Reading Increase opportunities with reading software as needed Set goals with students and monitor the goals Monitor progress of student goals through student conferencing Align the taught and tested curriculum with grade level standards Utilize Achievement Level Descriptors in PLCs Celebrate individual student, classroom, and grade level success.

56 Challenge and Support ALL Quartiles with high quality instruction.

57 Climate Stars Surveys Discipline Safe & Substance Free Environment Attendance

58 School Climate Star Rating Student Discipline Suspension Weights: Any # of ISS: 1 2 OSS: 3 4 OSS: 5 9 OSS: 10 or More OSS 0.5 pts. 1.0 pts. 3.0 pts. 5.0 pts. 7.0 pts. Alternative School Assignment 6.0 pts. (for disruptive students only) Expulsion 7.0 pts.

59 Second Order Changes for Students New Curriculum More Rigorous Assessments More than Multiple Choice Stronger Focus on Writing Skills Stronger Focus on Critical Reading Skills Testing on Computers Four New Achievement Levels Reported New Scoring Scales

60 The Impact of a Single Teacher Lexile Levels Achievement GAP Proficient Distinguished Percentages Content Mastery Student Growth Percentiles

61 What Works Best With the Media? These results come as no surprise to us. We had already analyzed the data and predicted the outcome in all of the content areas. We are already developing plans grade level by grade level and in all subject areas to address any weaknesses that we have -- just as we have done in the past.

62 What Works Best with Low Climate Stars? These results come as no surprise to us. We had already analyzed the data and knew how we were performing in all domains of the Climate Stars. We have developed a plan for improving our performance in discipline and student attendance. We have dealt appropriately with a few students who had behavior issues. We are committed to protecting the learning environment for all students. Good behavior and great attendance are non-negotiables.

63 What I have learned: We must engage the staff. We must torture the data until it confesses. We must build key metrics into our plans. We must periodically monitor the key metrics. We must make mid-course corrections. We must keep up with CCRPI Changes.

64 Regression Analysis Predictor Score Fall 2013 Newton Math Spring 2014 Math CRCT Descending Order

65 Dealing with Teacher Unrest I wish all of this mess would go away so I could just teach!

66 College and Career Readiness Performance Index 2016 C C R P I 3-Year Average for Focus Schools Scores of Weakest Students Pass Rates on State Tests 3-Year Average for Priority Schools Student Growth Year to Year Miscellaneous Indicators Grad Rates or Readiness for Next School Climate Stars 1 to 5 Stars based on: Surveys of Students, Staff, Parents Discipline Data School-Wide Attendance Safe and Substance Free School Challenge Points Up to 10 additional points added for: Flags for Performance of SWD, EL, & Econ. Disadvantaged Students Exceeding the Bar Indicators for staff/student/school performance

67 Links to Key Websites Assessment/Accountability/Pages/default.aspx Milestones-Assessment-System.aspx