San Diego County 2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Assessment Results

Similar documents
Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

California State University EAP Updates 2016

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Shelters Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

and Beyond! Evergreen School District PAC February 1, 2012

12-month Enrollment

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

El Toro Elementary School

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

Local Educational Agency California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Student Data File Layout

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

EAP. updates KHENG WAICHE. early proficiency programs coordinator

Kahului Elementary School

Engage Educate Empower

Transportation Equity Analysis

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

46 Children s Defense Fund

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Student Packets and Teacher Guide. Grades 6, 7, 8

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Hokulani Elementary School

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Raw Data Files Instructions

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Best Colleges Main Survey

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

CDS Code


Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Campus Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Data Diskette & CD ROM

University of Arizona

Final. Developing Minority Biomedical Research Talent in Psychology: The APA/NIGMS Project

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

Deer Valley High School WASC MID CYCLE REPORT

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Educational Attainment

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

A Lesson Study Project: Connecting Theory and Practice Through the Development of an Exemplar Video for Algebra I Teachers and Students

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

New Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

Cuero Independent School District

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Transcription:

San 2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Assessment Results On Sept. 27, 2017, the California Department of Education (CDE) released statewide results from the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP). The CAASPP system, established on Jan. 1, 2014, includes the computer-based Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) summative tests that measure student knowledge of California's English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics standards. This report provides a summary of the 2017 CAASPP results for San. Student scores are reported across four performance levels (standard exceeded, standard met, standard nearly met, and standard not met) for ELA and mathematics. The SBAC ELA and mathematics summative tests allow students to demonstrate analytical writing, critical thinking, and problemsolving skills along with their knowledge of grade-level content aligned to state standards. Key Findings More than 255,000 students in San took the English language arts and mathematics Smarter Balanced assessments in spring 2017. More than 3.2 million students statewide took the English language arts and mathematics Smarter Balanced assessments in spring 2017. Based on overall results, nearly 6 out of 10 San students met or exceeded standards in English language arts/literacy, compared to about 5 out of 10 students at the state level. Based on overall results, more than 4 out of 10 students San students met or exceeded standards in mathematics compared to just under 4 out of 10 students at the state level. Disaggregated assessment results reveal that an achievement gap exists between language learners, economically disadvantaged, and ethnically diverse students. The third year of results of the summative ELA and math assessments show that students are performing similarly to the 2016 results and maintaining gains from the 2015 baseline results. Resources CAASPP Test Results Webpage: http://caaspp.cde.ca.gov/sb2017/default CDE CAASPP Information Webpage: http://caaspp.cde.ca.gov/sb2017/default Learning and Leadership Services Division October 2017

Percent of Students at Percent of Students at San 2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Assessment Results Page 2 Figures 1a and 1b indicate the percentage of students in San scoring at each achievement level on the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) summative tests in English language arts and mathematics. Figure 1a 2016 English Language Arts/Literacy 5 3 1 Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met State (n=3,206,556) 28% 23% 28% San (n=255,522) 25% 31% 21% 23% In English language arts, 56 percent of San students scored at the standard met or standard exceeded achievement levels on the 2017 summative SBAC test, compared to 48 percent at the state level. Figure 1b 5 3 1 Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met State (n=3,218,106) 18% 27% 36% San (n=257,361) 22% 22% 26% 3 In mathematics, 44 percent of San students scored at the standards met or standards exceeded achievement levels on the 2017 summative SBAC test, compared to 38 percent at the state level.

Percent of Students at Percent of Students at San 2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Assessment Results Page 3 8 Figure 1c 2015 to 2017 Comparison English Language Arts/Literacy 6 State State State San San San 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 Met or Exceeded 44% 49% 49% 51% 56% 56% in English language arts, the same percentage of students met or exceeded standards in 2017, compared to 2016. Statewide, the same percentage of students met or exceeded standard in 2017, compared to 2016. Figure 1d 2015 to 2017 Comparison Mathematics 8 6 State State State San San San 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 Met or Exceeded 33% 37% 38% 44% 44% in mathematics, the same percentage of students in San met or exceeded standards in 2017 compared to 2016 results. Statewide, 1 percent more students met or exceeded standards in 2017.

Percent of Students at Percent of Students at San 2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Assessment Results Page 4 Figures 2a and 2b indicate overall student performance for key areas, also known as claims, for English language arts and mathematics. (NOTE: Claim level results are reported in three achievement levels: Above, Near, and Below.) 8 6 Figure 2a 2017 English Language Arts Claim Level Reading Writing Listening Research Above 29% 31% 21% 33% Near 45% 44% 61% 47% Below 26% 24% 17% 21% Approximately 3 out of 10 students scored above standard in the reading, writing, and research claims. 2 out of 10 students scored above standard, while 6 out of 10 students score near standard in the listening claim. 8 6 Concepts & Procedures Figure 2b Claim Level Problem Solving and Modeling & Data Analysis Communicating Reasoning Above 3 24% 25% Near 31% 44% 48% Below 39% 32% 28%

Percent of Students at San 2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Assessment Results Page 5 Approximately 3 out of 10 students scored above standard and near standard in the concepts and procedures claim area. Just over 4 out of 10 students scored near standard in the problem solving and modeling and data analysis claims, and nearly 5 out of 10 students scored near standard in the communicating reasoning claim. Figure 3a compares the percentage of students in San scoring at the standard met or exceeded and standard not met or nearly met achievement levels by grade level on the SBAC summative tests in English language arts. Figure 3a 2017 English Language Arts/Literacy Achievement Level by Level 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 11th Met or Exceeded 52% 53% 55% 54% 56% 55% 64% 56% Not Met or Nearly Met 48% 47% 45% 46% 44% 45% 36% 44% All The percent of students meeting or exceeding standards across grade spans ranged from 52 percent in 3 to 64 percent in 11. The percent of students not meeting or nearly meeting standards ranged from 36 percent for 11 to 48 percent in 3.

Percent of Students at San 2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Assessment Results Page 6 Figure 3b compares the percentage of students in San scoring at the standard met or exceeded and standard not met or nearly met achievement levels by grade level on the SBAC summative tests in mathematics. Figure 3b Achievement Level by Level 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 11th Met or Exceeded 54% 47% 43% 42% 42% 41% 36% 44% Not Met or Nearly Met 46% 53% 58% 58% 58% 59% 64% 56% All The percent of students meeting or exceeding standards across grade spans ranged from 36 percent in 11 to 54 percent in 3. The percent of students not meeting or nearly meeting standards ranged from 46 percent in 3 to 64 percent for 11.

Percent of Students at San 2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Assessment Results Page 7 Figure 4a indicates the percentage of students in San scoring at each achievement level by major racial/ethnic groups on the SBAC summative tests in English language arts. 10 Figure 4a 2017 English Language Arts/Literacy Student Achievement Level By Ethnicity 9 8 7 6 5 3 1 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White Ethnicity -- Two or More Races Not Met 35% 36% 9% 9% 32% 26% 13% 14% Nearly Met 25% 25% 11% 16% 26% 24% 17% 18% Met 27% 25% 29% 37% 28% 32% 34% 33% Exceeded 13% 14% 51% 39% 14% 18% 36% 34% Approximately 3 out of 4 Asian, Filipino, and white students met or exceeded the English language arts state standards. Nearly 2 out of 5 African American, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Hispanic students met or exceeded the English language arts state standards.

Percent of Students at San 2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Assessment Results Page 8 Figure 4b indicates the percentage of students in San scoring at each achievement level by major racial/ethnic groups on the SBAC summative tests in mathematics. 10 Figure 4b Student Achievement Level By Ethnicity 9 8 7 6 5 3 1 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White Ethnicity -- Two or More Races Not Met 46% 47% 9% 14% 41% 33% 18% Nearly Met 28% 26% 14% 23% 29% 29% 24% 25% Met 17% 17% 22% 29% 19% 23% 27% 25% Exceeded 9% 1 54% 33% 1 15% 32% 3 3 out of 4 Asian students met or exceeded the mathematics state standards. Nearly 6 out of 10 Filipino and white students met or exceeded the mathematics state standards. 1 out of 4 African American and American Indian/Alaska Native met or exceeded the mathematics state standards Nearly 3 out of 10 Hispanic students met or exceeded the mathematics state standards.

Percent of Students at Each AchievementLevel Percent of Students at San 2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Assessment Results Page 9 Figures 5a and 5b indicate the percentage of students in San scoring at each achievement level for economically disadvantaged students on the SBAC summative tests in English language arts and mathematics. Figure 5a 2017 English Language Arts/Literacy Economically Disadvantaged 5 3 1 Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met State (n=1,935,586) 11% 25% 26% 38% San (n=132,883) 13% 27% 26% 34% 4 out of 10 economically disadvantaged students met or exceed standards in English language arts, compared to 1 out of 3 at the state level. Figure 5b Economically Disadvantaged 5 3 1 Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met State (n=1,942,785) 8% 16% 29% 47% San (n=134,246) 1 18% 29% 43% Just over 1 out of 4 economically disadvantaged students met or exceed standards in mathematics, compared to just over 1 out of 5 at the state level.

San 2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Assessment Results Page 10 Figure 6a and 6b indicate the percentage of students in San scoring at each achievement level for English learners (EL), Reclassified Fluent English Proficient (R-FEP), and Ever-EL (former and current EL students) on the SBAC summative tests in English language arts and mathematics Figure 6a 2017 English Language Arts/Literacy English Learners, R-FEP, Ever-EL 10 9 8 7 6 5 3 1 EL CA EL San R-FEP CA R-FEP San Ever-EL CA Ever-EL San Not Met: Level 1 64% 57% 15% 11% 37% 34% Nearly Met: Level 2 24% 26% 27% 25% 26% 26% Met: Level 3 1 13% 38% 41% 25% 27% Exceeded: Level 4 2% 4% 23% 12% 13% Nearly 1 in 5 English learner students met or exceed standards in English language arts, compared to 1 out of 8 at the state level. Nearly 2 out of 3 reclassified students met or exceeded standard in English language arts, compared to just under 6 out of 10 at the state level. 4 out of 10 current and former English learners, Ever-ELs, met or exceed standards in English language arts, compared to 1 out of 3 at the state level.

San 2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Assessment Results Page 11 Figure 6b English Learners, Reclassified, Ever-EL 10 9 8 7 6 5 3 1 EL CA EL San R-FEP CA R-FEP San Ever-EL CA Ever-EL San Not Met: Level 1 64% 59% 28% 25% 45% 42% Nearly Met: Level 2 23% 25% 31% 31% 27% 28% Met: Level 3 9% 11% 23% 24% 16% 18% Exceeded: Level 4 3% 4% 18% 11% 12% Approximately 1 out of 6 English learner students met or exceed standards in mathematics, compared to 1 out of 8 at the state level. Just over 4 out of 10 reclassified students met or exceeded standard in mathematics, compared to 4 out of 10 at the state level. 3 out of 10 current and former English learners, Ever-ELs, met or exceed standards in mathematics, compared to 1 out of 4 at the state level.