Engagement & Commitment

Similar documents
State Budget Update February 2016

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

Creating Collaborative Partnerships: The Success Stories and Challenges

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

State Parental Involvement Plan

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

UH STEM Pathways Project

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

ANNUAL REPORT of the ACM Education Policy Committee For the Period: July 1, June 30, 2016 Submitted by Jeffrey Forbes, Chair

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

District Advisory Committee. October 27, 2015

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

From practice to practice: What novice teachers and teacher educators can learn from one another Abstract

Public School Choice DRAFT

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

The completed proposal should be forwarded to the Chief Instructional Officer and the Academic Senate.

Integrating Common Core Standards and CASAS Content Standards: Improving Instruction and Adult Learner Outcomes

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Getting Ready for the Work Readiness Credential: A Guide for Trainers and Instructors of Jobseekers

SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FACT SHEET CALENDAR YEARS 2014 & TECHNOLOGIES - 45 Months. On Time Completion Rates (Graduation Rates)

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

University of Toronto

K-12 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

CURRICULUM PROCEDURES REFERENCE MANUAL. Section 3. Curriculum Program Application for Existing Program Titles (Procedures and Accountability Report)

The mission of the Grants Office is to secure external funding for college priorities via local, state, and federal funding sources.

Strategic Planning Guide

BSM 2801, Sport Marketing Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Digital Transformation in Education. Future-Ready Skills

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Evaluating Progress NGA Center for Best Practices STEM Summit

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

HSC/SOM GOAL 1: IMPROVE HEALTH AND HEALTHCARE IN THE POPULATIONS WE SERVE.

Understanding the First Year Experience: An Avenue to Explore Trends in Higher Education (Keynote)

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Curriculum Development Manual: Academic Disciplines

Is Open Access Community College a Bad Idea?

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

GRADUATE CURRICULUM REVIEW REPORT

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

The Teaching and Learning Center

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

World s Best Workforce Plan

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING THROUGH ONE S LIFETIME

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

Program Rating Sheet - University of South Carolina - Columbia Columbia, South Carolina

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

An APEL Framework for the East of England

Rachel Edmondson Adult Learner Analyst Jaci Leonard, UIC Analyst

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

LEN HIGHTOWER, Ph.D.

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Shank, Matthew D. (2009). Sports marketing: A strategic perspective (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

University of Richmond Teacher Preparation Handbook

An Introduction to LEAP

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Transcription:

Engagement & Commitment

The Office of Community College Research and Leadership (OCCRL) was established in 1989 at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. OCCRL is affiliated with the Department of Education Policy, Organization and Leadership in the College of Education. Our mission is to use research and evaluation methods to improve policies, programs, and practices to enhance community college education and transition to college for diverse learners at the state, national, and international levels. Projects of this office are supported by state, federal, and private and not-for-profit organizations. The contents of publications do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of our sponsors or the University of Illinois. Comments or inquiries about our publications are welcome and should be directed to OCCRL@illinois.edu. This module is part of a series of publications associated with the Pathways to Results initiative that is funded by a grant from the Illinois Community College Board (ICCB Grant Agreement Number 2014-00266). Acknowledgement: Staff of the Office of Community College Research and Leadership (OCCRL) thank the Illinois Community College Board for their persistent and gracious support of the Pathways to Results (PTR) initiative. We also express our thanks to the PTR team leaders and team members throughout the state who have piloted and implemented PTR since its inception. Finally, we thank Design House for their creative contributions to the design work on this publication. Suggested Citation: Nicholson-Tosh, K., Bragg, D., & Taylor, J. (2014). Engagement and commitment. (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Office of Community College Research and Leadership, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Copyright 2014 Board of Trustees, University of Illinois Phase Pathways Pathways Four: to Process results: to results: Improvement engagement & commitment &

Pathways to Results (PTR) is an outcomes-focused, equity-guided process to improve pathways and policies that support student transition to and through postsecondary education and employment. PTR focuses on addressing equity gaps between diverse learner groups and continuously improving processes critical to student success, including retention, completion of postsecondary credentials, and transition to employment. The PTR process is most effective when it begins with a strong collaboration of team members and partners focusing on the critical problems that get in the way of student success. These problems are identified when the teams use student-level data to identify outcome and equity gaps in results between racial, gender, low-income and other underserved groups. Major processes are assessed to understand how contributing factors create the identified problems and impede student success. Implementation and evaluation plans are designed to create solutions that increase the impact of pathways immediately and over time. Team members reflect on what they have learned and share insights with one another, enabling them to sustain and scale the knowledge they have acquired with others. An overarching goal and benefit of the PTR process is that it provides the opportunity to continuously improve pathways and programs that produce ever-more equitable student outcomes. PTR provides the opportunity to continuously improve pathways and produce evermore equitable student outcomes. When PTR is implemented fully, the opportunity to improve pathways never ends. 1 1

Overview Engagement and Commitment is fundamentally about improving programs and pathways. It invites and forms a broad-based group of stakeholders into a partnership that is committed to creating more equitable outcomes for all students. This partnership should include education practitioners; policy makers and policy leaders; business, industry, labor and community leaders; workforce investment board (WIB) members; adult education providers; community-based organizations; parents and students; and others who are committed to achievement and success for all students. The purpose of the partnership is to provide direction and support for full-scale implementation of Pathways to Results (PTR), including understanding the capacity of local schools, colleges, universities and workforce training providers to meet the needs of diverse learners; researching policy and funding sources that may be needed to help implement needed changes; reviewing local and regional labor market data to understand which pathways are important to the area; and analyzing other data pertaining to the performance of students in progressing through the education system and obtaining employment. Pathways to results: engagement & commitment

Purpose and Goals The primary purpose of Engagement and Commitment is to form a broad-based group of stakeholders that is committed to achieving more equitable outcomes for all students. This partnership should include education practitioners; policy makers and policy leaders; business, industry, labor and community leaders; workforce investment board (WIB) members; workforce and adult education providers; community-based organizations; parents and students; and others who are committed to improving access, achievement and success for all students. The partnership recommends individuals to serve on a team that is tasked with carrying out the project. By reviewing data on existing student performance, teams prioritize pathways and programs that should be improved to raise student achievement and enhance student success. The goals of this process are to: 1. engage and gain the commitment of key partners and team members in implementing and improving programs and pathways, 2. review existing data to help specify and refine the initial problem statement that is included in the PTR Charter, and 3. plan from the beginning to transfer lessons learned to other pathways and programs that need to be improved. Outcomes and Equity Engagement and Commitment invites the partnership to participate in an open and thoughtful dialogue about the fundamental ways programs and pathways can be improved. Once formed, team members are invited to participate in this dialogue too. A critical goal of PTR is to close gaps in academic achievement, high school graduation, college and career readiness, college transition and completion, credential attainment, placement in familywage employment, and other critical outcomes between student sub-groups so that all students benefit from their education experience. Stakeholders who represent business, industry and labor organizations; K-12 schools, colleges and universities; and other workforce, adult and community-based groups need to be engaged to ensure that all students have the support they need to be successful. Especially important to the PTR process are individuals who champion success for underserved student populations. By ensuring that an equity-minded approach is used to support all students, the PTR process can contribute to improving student outcomes. Outputs Materials available to support this process are: SWOT Analysis results, Outcomes Menu, and PTR Charter. 3

Steps at a Glance Step 1: Engage leaders and form the partnership. This step invites education, employer, community and other leaders to engage in a partnership to guide and support the PTR project. The partnership engages leaders in a thoughtful dialogue to garner their support for carrying out a PTR project that is focused on improving pathways. These leaders bring significant experience with the local context, and they advise on the selection of pathways and programs that matter to the student populations served by the education system and the local economy. They recommend pathways that need improvement to create more equitable outcomes. Step 2: Gather input from the partnership. Step 2 asks the partnership to review policy and funding pertaining to education; to analyze local and regional labor market data; and to study other information that may be relevant to setting priorities for the PTR process. The partnership is encouraged to conduct a SWOT Analysis (See Appendix A) to determine the capacity of educational institutions, employers, workforce and adult providers and other organizations to work collaboratively to improve pathways and programs of study. Once the pathways and programs are identified, a problem statement is formulated for the PTR Charter that articulates issues and concerns with selected programs. Members of the partnership are invited to sign the initial draft of the PTR Charter to establish a clear, agreed-upon starting point for the PTR process. Step 3: Identify and convene the team. The partnership recommends individuals for the team, including recommending individuals who are good candidates to lead the team. The team leader has primary responsibility for communicating regularly with the partnership, extending meeting invitations to team members and others, gathering materials and resources for team meetings, summarizing and reporting results of the PTR process to local and state leaders, and providing direction and support throughout the entire process. Step 1: Form the Partnership Step 2: Gather Input Step 3: Identify and Convene Team Pathways to results: engagement & commitment

Who Should be Involved? The partnership should be composed of representatives from all levels of education, including K-12 schools and postsecondary institutions (2- and 4-year colleges and universities); employers and labor; workforce and adult providers; community-based organizations; and others who are committed to the future of the region s education, workforce, and economic entities. When selecting individuals to serve the partnership as well as the team, consideration should be given to selecting individuals who are responsible for: program quality, including program review and improvement academic (K-12 and college) and career planning student success within and beyond the classroom curriculum and instructional innovation, including technology applications student assessment and advisement student progression, credentialing and completion Detailed Steps Step 1: Engage leaders and form the partnership. This step begins with key stakeholders formed into a committed, broad-based partnership working together to develop a statement of mission and goals to guide efforts to improve pathways. This statement provides clarity of purpose for the project, including reducing the potential for misunderstanding among partners. A shared vision is critical to providing leadership during periods of transformational change, so a plan is developed to ensure education practitioners, policy leaders, employers, community members, and other stakeholders understand the PTR process and communicate frequently about resources and activities that support it. The partnership engages in significant discussions (League for Innovation in the Community College, 2010, p. 1) that draw upon historic and current labor market data; information about the current status of pathways, and bridge programs; the performance of diverse groups who participate in education; and other information pertaining to education, the workforce, and the economy. The stakeholders should include organizations and individuals who represent all levels of the education pipeline as well as business, industry and labor representatives; communitybased organization and other community representatives, and members of local workforce investment boards (WIBs). The partnership is also identified and convened to review background documentation and tools, templates and materials specified in the appendices of this module. 5

Step 2: Gather input from the partnership. The partnership members also review the PTR modules and materials on the OCCRL website. A period of study and reflection enables members of the partnership to create a shared understanding of the current status of education in the region and apply this knowledge to the PTR process. The stakeholders are responsible for giving input to the initial draft of the PTR Charter (see Appendix A), including providing goals and developing the initial problem statement. All members of the partnership are invited to sign the PTR Charter to demonstrate their commitment to improving pathways and programs of study by addressing issues and concerns that get in the way of all students success in school and the labor market. The PTR Charter is further developed in the Outcomes and Equity Assessment process. Step 3: Identify and convene the team. The partnership recommends identifying individuals who will be valuable contributors to the team, including individuals who will provide leadership for the team. Inviting the partnership to recommend team members provides a way for partners to own the PTR process even when they cannot be engaged in all the meetings, due to other leadership obligations. The team leader has primary responsibility for extending meeting invitations, gathering materials and resources for team meetings, summarizing and reporting the progress of the team, and providing direction and support throughout the process. Team members have a responsibility for participating fully in the process and contributing individually and collectively to improving pathways. An activity of special importance to the team is review and analysis of existing data on student performance and outcomes pertaining to the selected pathway (see the Outcomes Menu in Appendix C). Results of previous program review, accreditation, and other evaluation and assessment processes should be studied by team members to give them an idea of pathway and program quality and student outcomes, including participation (enrollment), academic achievement, retention, completion, credentialing, and employment. (These data will be further analyzed and disaggregated by student sub-group during Outcomes and Equity Assessment.) By the end of Engagement and Commitment, team members work collaboratively to update the PTR Charter and develop the beginning of the plan. This plan should communicate a meeting strategy, timeline, and responsibilities for addressing each process and related products and outputs of the PTR project. Pathways to results: engagement & commitment

Reflection Questions 1. How do partners and team members engage in the PTR process? 2. How does Engagement and Commitment facilitate improving pathways and programs? 3. What problems emerge as most critical to improving the performance of diverse student groups? 4. How does the PTR project align with other pathway or program improvement goals of the partners? References & Resources Amey, M. J., Eddy, P. L., & Campbell, T. (2010). Crossing boundaries: Creating partnerships to promote educational transitions. Community College Review, 37(4), 333-347. Conley, D. (2012). College and career ready: Helping all students succeed beyond high school. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Press. Eddy, P. L. (2010). Partnerships and collaborations in higher education. ASHE higher education report. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Press. League for Innovation in the Community College. (2010). Significant discussions: A guide for secondary and postsecondary curriculum alignment. Phoenix, AZ: Author. Retrieved from http://www.league.org/league/projects/significant_discussions/files/ SignificantDiscussions2.pdf Nicholson-Tosh, K., & Bragg, D. (2013). Illinois career clusters, pathways, and programs of study guide. Champaign, IL: Office of Community College Research and Leadership, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Oakes, J., & Saunders, M. (2008). Beyond tracking: Multiple pathways to college, career, and civic participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Soares, L. (2010). The power of the education-industry partnership: Fostering collaboration between community colleges and businesses. Washington D.C.: Center for American Progress. Retrieved from http://www.americanprogress.org/ issues/2010/10/community_colleges.html. States Career Clusters Initiative. (2011). Pathways to college and career readiness: Career clusters. Retrieved from http://careerclusters.org 7

Appendix A SWOT Analysis Tool Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats Pathways to results: engagement & commitment

Appendix B PTR Charter Lead Organization: Charter Created: Last Charter Updated: Part I: Pathway: Problem: What problem(s) is the team attempting to solve? Rationale: Why should the problem be addressed? Why is the project worth doing now? What are the consequences of not doing the project? Reference documents that are relevant, such as grant proposals. 9

PTR Charter (continued) Cluster Partners and other Stakeholders: What organizations, partners and other stakeholders will be involved and affected by the project, and what are their expected contributions? Partners and other Stakeholders Expected Contributions Project Sponsor/Owner: Who is/are the project sponsor/owner(s) who will be responsible for ongoing implementation of the identified solutions? Team Members and Roles: Specify the members of the improvement team and their roles within the team. Pathways to results: engagement & commitment

Team member Team role(s) Telephone Email address Leadership Team Member; Postsecondary Faculty (4 year) Leadership Team Member; Postsecondary Faculty (2 year) Leadership Team Member; Secondary Faculty Leadership Team Member; Postsecondary Counseling Representative Leadership Team Member Project Lead; Leadership Team Project Lead; Leadership Team Administrator Leadership Team Member; Institutional Researcher Leadership Team Member; Information Technology Administrator Leadership Team Member; Guidance and Counseling Leadership Team Member; Support Services Career Advisory Committee (business and industry representatives) Career Advisory Committee (business and industry representatives) 11

PTR Charter (continued) Charter Approvals: Implementation Team Leader Signature Other Team Member Signatures: Project Sponsor/ Process Owner Signature Additional Project Sponsor/ Process Owner Signature Additional Project Sponsor/ Process Owner Signature Pathways to results: engagement & commitment

Charter - Part II: Improvement Goals: What are the goals of the project? Specify how the team will determine if these goals have been achieved. Goals How the team will determine if the goals are achieved? met? 13

PTR Charter (continued) Implementation Team Plan: Indicate the following aspects of the PTR project: Key tasks, team members, and target dates. Event/ Task Team member Target Pathways to results: engagement & commitment

Event/ Task Team member Target Students and other beneficiaries: Based on what you know now, what student groups are most likely to benefit from the project, and in what manner? Other Resources: What other resources are needed to support the project? 15

Appendix C Outcomes Menu This tool provides a list of student outcomes that your partnership and its member organizations have already collected related to the identified pathway. The list provides a starting point for a team conversation about student outcomes that should be part of the PTR project. Teams should check outcomes that are currently analyzed at any point along the educational pipeline. In Outcomes and Equity Assessment, the team conducts additional outcomes assessment by racial/ethnic, gender, age, and other characteristics to measure student performance and set the stage for addressing identified equity gaps. Place a check in the box if results are currently available Outcomes Academic Achievement in Language Arts, Reading, Math, Science, & CTE (each grade level) Cluster-level course (CTE) attainment Secondary technical skill (CTE) attainment (based on technical skill assessment) Graduation from high school (diploma attainment) Enrollment in honors & AP courses Completion of a major educational functioning level (for Adult Education Students) GED completion Dual credit participation Job placement after high school Successful completion of college placement exams Enrollment in community college or other 2-year college Enrollment in postsecondary credit-bearing coursework Enrollment in 4-year college or university Completion of developmental education (by level) Completion of gatekeeper course in English Pathways to results: engagement & commitment

Place a check in the box if results are currently available Outcomes Completion of gatekeeper course in Math Completion of gatekeeper course in CTE Completion of 15 college-level credits Completion of 30 college-level credits Completion of the transfer (general education core) curriculum Semester-to-semester retention Credit-hours attempted/completed Postsecondary technical skill (CTE) attainment (based on technical skill assessment) Certificate completion Associate s degree completion Bachelor s degree completion Job placement after 2-year college Job placement after 4-year college Transfer from 2-year college to 4-year college Earnings (either average earnings or earnings change) Employment in an industry related to the pathway Employment retention Other: Other: Other: Other: 17

Office of Community College Research and Leadership University of Illinois 51 Gerty Drive, 129 CRC Champaign, IL 61820 occrl@illinois.edu http://occrl.illinois.edu (217) 244-9390