Medical Advice Quality and Availability in Rural India (MAQARI)

Similar documents
According to the Census of India, rural

National rural Health mission Ministry of Health and Family Welfare government of India, new delhi

NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI PROSPECTUS FOR JAWAHAR NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SELECTION TEST- 2014

[For Admission Test to VI Class] Based on N.C.E.R.T. Pattern. By J. N. Sharma & T. S. Jain UPKAR PRAKASHAN, AGRA 2

NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI PROSPECTUS FOR JAWAHAR NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SELECTION TEST- 2016

JOIN INDIAN COAST GUARD

NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI PROSPECTUS FOR JAWAHAR NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SELECTION TEST- 2018

NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI PROSPECTUS FOR JAWAHAR NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SELECTION TEST- 2015

NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI PROSPECTUS FOR JAWAHAR NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SELECTION TEST- 2015

व रण क ए आ दन-पत र. Prospectus Cum Application Form. न दय व kऱय सम त. Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti ਨਵ ਦ ਆ ਦਵਦ ਆਦ ਆ ਸਦ ਤ. Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti

Ref. No.YFI/ Dated:

JAWAHAR NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA, RAKH JAGANOO DISTT:UDHAMPUR (J&K)

HCFC Phase-Out Management Plan Servicing Sector

OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING (ODL) EDUCATION SYSTEM: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE A SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF AN ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION SYSTEM

Accessing Higher Education in Developing Countries: panel data analysis from India, Peru and Vietnam

Level 1 Mathematics and Statistics, 2015

STATUS OF OPAC AND WEB OPAC IN LAW UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES IN SOUTH INDIA

Kenya: Age distribution and school attendance of girls aged 9-13 years. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 20 December 2012

Literacy Level in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana States A Statistical Study

Systematic Assessment and Monitoring leading to Improving Quality of Education

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

The Comparative Study of Information & Communications Technology Strategies in education of India, Iran & Malaysia countries

Ioe Entrance Exam 2070 Model Question Papers

Biodiversity Conservation

A Study of Socio-Economic Status and Emotional Intelligence among Madrasa and Islamic School students towards Inclusive Development

STUDENT SATISFACTION IN PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION IN GWALIOR

BREAST FEEDING: ADVOCACY & PRACTICE COURSE. November 21 December 4, 2010 A REPORT

WORKSHOP. technologies

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Measures of the Location of the Data

ESSAYS ON THE INDIAN PENAL CODE

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

The Good Judgment Project: A large scale test of different methods of combining expert predictions

Listening and Speaking Skills of English Language of Adolescents of Government and Private Schools

HIMACHAL PRADESH NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, SHIMLA GHANDAL, P.O. SHAKRAH, SUB TEHSIL DHAMI, DISTRICT SHIMLA

QUEEN S UNIVERSITY BELFAST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DENTISTRY AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES ADMISSION POLICY STATEMENT FOR MEDICINE FOR 2018 ENTRY

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Improving recruitment, hiring, and retention practices for VA psychologists: An analysis of the benefits of Title 38

EDUCATION. Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric

Interpreting ACER Test Results

The International Coach Federation (ICF) Global Consumer Awareness Study

Creating Teachers Communities of Learning. Report on the Subject Teacher Forum Program IT for Change

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Rwanda. Out of School Children of the Population Ages Percent Out of School 10% Number Out of School 217,000

RURAL LIBRARY AS COMMUNITY INFORMATION CENTRE: A STUDY OF KARNATAKA STATE

Details of educational qualifications

Information Communication Technology (ICT) Infrastructure Facilities in Self-Financing Engineering College Libraries in Tamil Nadu

How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

Parent Information Welcome to the San Diego State University Community Reading Clinic

Dut Prospectus Download or Read Online ebook dut prospectus in PDF Format From The Best User Guide Database

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

National Academies STEM Workforce Summit

Leprosy case detection using schoolchildren

CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACHIEVEMENT TEST Introduction One of the important duties of a teacher is to observe the student in the classroom, laboratory and

International Branches

Syed Mohammad Safdar Ashraf

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

Pragmatic Constraints affecting the Teacher Efficacy in Ethiopia - An Analytical Comparison with India

The One Minute Preceptor: 5 Microskills for One-On-One Teaching

Central Institute of Educational Technology (CIET)

Principal vacancies and appointments

The Impacts of Regular Upward Bound on Postsecondary Outcomes 7-9 Years After Scheduled High School Graduation

Trends in College Pricing

This article is a contribution to the

Curriculum Vitae of Prof. Yoginder Singh Verma

Global Institute of Public Health

Fruitvale Station Shopping Center > Retail

UPPER SECONDARY CURRICULUM OPTIONS AND LABOR MARKET PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM A GRADUATES SURVEY IN GREECE

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

University of Essex Access Agreement

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

The Rise of Results-Based Financing in Education 2015

Saiyad Nazia Fatima Rizvi* Department of Agri-Business Management, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, Punjab. Abstract

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

A Pipelined Approach for Iterative Software Process Model

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

LANGUAGE DIVERSITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Paul De Grauwe. University of Leuven

POLICE COMMISSIONER. New Rochelle, NY

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HOMOEOPATHY

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

Basic Standards for Residency Training in Internal Medicine. American Osteopathic Association and American College of Osteopathic Internists

An Evaluation of E-Resources in Academic Libraries in Tamil Nadu

Algebra 1, Quarter 3, Unit 3.1. Line of Best Fit. Overview

Dirty Minds The Business Quiz. IQL Anniversary Quiz 3

E-Learning for empowering the rural people in Bangladesh

Global Health Kitwe, Zambia Elective Curriculum

Guinea. Out of School Children of the Population Ages Percent Out of School 46% Number Out of School 842,000

Teacher intelligence: What is it and why do we care?

Guatemala: Teacher-Training Centers of the Salesians

Manchester Academy for Healthcare Scientist Education STP OPEN DAY. MAHSE ( Professor Phil Padfield.

BIOH : Principles of Medical Physiology

Professional Development and Incentives for Teacher Performance in Schools in Mexico. Gladys Lopez-Acevedo (LCSPP)*

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Risk factors in an ageing population: Evidence from SAGE

Transcription:

Medical Advice Quality and Availability in Rural India (MAQARI) Karthik Muralidharan, UC San Diego with Monisha Ashok, Jishnu Das, Alaka Holla, Michael Kremer, Aakash Mohpal

The MAQARI Project Panel study of our 2003 work on teacher/medical worker absence Revisit the same PHC s/chc s from 2003 provider absence study Nationwide mapping of healthcare availability and quality in rural India 19 states, ~10 districts/state, ~8 villages/district (>1500 villages total) Full census of healthcare providers in these villages Provider quality (knowledge) measured with vignettes Simple HH survey to understand health seeking behavior Detailed understanding of rural healthcare markets in one state (MP) 100 villages across 5 districts Full census of HH and all providers they go to (even outside the village) Provider quality measured through day-long participant observation (PO) In 3 districts, we also measure provider quality with standardized patients (SP) Administer SP s to public doctors in both their both public and private practice Detailed household survey to model household choice of providers

Nationwide Sample: What do we do? Document provider availability (by practice type, qualification) across rural India Supplement with a short HH survey of ~15 HH/village to record basic health seeking behavior Measure the quality of providers using vignettes and estimate the correlates of quality Tuberculosis; Pre-eclampsia, Diarrhea/Dysentery Three main sets of results: Existence of providers (by type) Household choices of provider type (by access) Quality of medical providers and their correlates/distribution

Provider Census

Number of Providers Per Village Mean Number of Health Care Providers Per Village Mean Number of Health Care Providers Per 1,000 villagers Andhra Pradesh 5.25 2.23 Assam 3.95 3.89 Bihar 6.01 2.31 Chattisgarh 13.82 9.29 Gujarat 4.97 1.98 Haryana 9.84 3.38 Himachal Pradesh 1.73 2.22 Jharkhand 3.11 2.66 Karnataka 2.86 1.40 Kerala 3.53 0.26 Madhya Pradesh 6.98 5.35 Maharastra 3.48 2.51 Orissa 5.18 3.94 Punjab 4.92 2.32 Rajasthan 7.14 2.82 Tamilnadu 2.84 1.39 Uttar Pradesh 6.71 2.56 Uttaranchal 6.11 5.65 West Bengal 11.05 3.34 India 5.86 2.79

Mean number of providers Number of providers per village and per 1,000 villagers 16.00 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 16,000.00 14,000.00 12,000.00 10,000.00 8,000.00 6,000.00 4,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 Mean village population Per village Per 1,000 villagers Mean village population

Number of Public and Private Providers per Village Mean Providers Per Village Mean Public Providers Per Village Mean Public Doctors Per Village Mean Public Nurses & ANMs Per Village Mean Public Other Providers Per Village Mean Private Providers Per Village Andhra Pradesh 5.25 3.00 0.23 2.45 0.29 2.24 Assam 3.95 2.24 0.11 2.02 0.09 1.70 Bihar 6.01 0.31 0.11 0.16 0.04 5.70 Chattisgarh 13.82 6.39 0.38 5.26 0.74 7.43 Gujarat 4.97 3.84 0.25 3.10 0.50 1.13 Haryana 9.84 4.14 0.48 3.00 0.67 5.71 Himachal Pradesh 1.73 0.78 0.16 0.19 0.43 0.95 Jharkhand 3.11 0.56 0.07 0.40 0.10 2.55 Karnataka 2.86 1.74 0.28 1.37 0.09 1.12 Kerala 3.53 1.95 1.56 0.24 0.12 1.58 Madhya Pradesh 6.98 4.13 0.16 3.32 0.65 2.85 Maharastra 3.48 2.24 0.10 1.74 0.39 1.25 Orissa 5.18 3.15 0.25 2.72 0.18 2.03 Punjab 4.92 0.79 0.44 0.16 0.16 4.14 Rajasthan 7.14 4.43 0.50 3.49 0.41 2.71 Tamilnadu 2.84 1.78 0.10 1.57 0.04 1.06 Uttar Pradesh 6.71 2.53 0.50 1.79 0.24 4.18 Uttaranchal 6.11 3.95 0.20 3.44 0.31 2.15 West Bengal 11.05 1.65 0.24 1.24 0.17 9.40 India 5.86 2.49 0.31 1.90 0.27 3.38

Number of Providers with Degrees per Village Mean MBBS Providers Per Village Mean Providers with Other Degree Per Village Mean Providers with No Degree Per Village Andhra Pradesh 0.25 0.47 4.49 Assam 0.24 0.33 3.33 Bihar 0.13 0.76 5.01 Chattisgarh 0.15 1.38 12.27 Gujarat 0.19 1.08 3.71 Haryana 0.12 1.48 8.25 Himachal Pradesh 0.07 0.54 1.11 Jharkhand 0.06 0.64 2.37 Karnataka 0.27 0.68 1.91 Kerala 1.43 1.62 0.43 Madhya Pradesh 0.07 0.81 6.08 Maharastra 0.04 1.12 2.31 Orissa 0.11 0.66 4.42 Punjab 0.35 1.12 3.41 Rajasthan 0.12 1.43 5.53 Tamilnadu 0.27 0.32 2.09 Uttar Pradesh 0.31 0.85 5.55 Uttaranchal 0.02 0.68 5.41 West Bengal 0.43 1.81 8.76 India 0.24 0.94 4.64

Number of Public and Private Providers with Degrees per Village Mean MBBS Providers Per Village Public Doctors Mean Providers with Other Degree Per Village Mean Providers with No Degree Per Village Mean MBBS Providers Per Village Private Providers Mean Providers with Other Degree Per Village Mean Providers with No Degree Per Village Andhra Pradesh 0.14 0.29 2.53 0.11 0.18 1.96 Assam 0.11 0.11 2.01 0.13 0.22 1.32 Bihar 0.06 0.11 0.14 0.07 0.65 4.87 Chattisgarh 0.08 0.40 5.91 0.07 0.98 6.36 Gujarat 0.11 0.31 3.42 0.07 0.77 0.28 Haryana 0.10 0.39 3.65 0.02 1.09 4.60 Himachal Pradesh 0.07 0.13 0.58 0.01 0.42 0.53 Jharkhand 0.01 0.18 0.37 0.05 0.46 2.00 Karnataka 0.12 0.16 1.46 0.15 0.52 0.45 Kerala 0.88 0.87 0.17 0.55 0.75 0.26 Madhya Pradesh 0.02 0.24 3.86 0.05 0.57 2.22 Maharastra 0.02 0.28 1.93 0.02 0.84 0.37 Orissa 0.10 0.26 2.79 0.00 0.40 1.63 Punjab 0.25 0.24 0.27 0.11 0.88 3.14 Rajasthan 0.07 0.83 3.49 0.05 0.60 2.03 Tamilnadu 0.11 0.09 1.50 0.15 0.23 0.59 Uttar Pradesh 0.24 0.22 2.07 0.07 0.64 3.48 Uttaranchal 0.00 0.26 3.69 0.01 0.42 1.71 West Bengal 0.10 0.15 1.39 0.33 1.66 7.37 India 0.14 0.27 2.07 0.11 0.67 2.58

16.00 Number of providers per village by degree type (Ordered by the number of MBBS degree doctors, largest to smallest) 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 MBBS Other degree No degree

Household Survey

0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Percentage of people who visited a public provider for primary care by state Public Provider (%) All-India mean is 23% 77% of primary care visits are to private providers

0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Percentage visiting a public provider for primary care by household income Above median Below median Percentage visiting a public provider for primary care by household income 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Highest quartile Lowest quartile

Where do households seek care in villages that have a public doctor? Village has a Public Doctor Village has no Public Doctor Public Provider (%) Private Provider (%) Public Provider (%) Private Provider (%) Andhra Pradesh 0.26 0.74 0.21 0.79 Assam 0.91 0.09 0.65 0.35 Bihar 0.15 0.85 0.09 0.91 Chattisgarh 0.22 0.78 0.12 0.88 Gujarat 0.23 0.77 0.13 0.87 Haryana 0.25 0.74 0.22 0.78 Himachal Pradesh 0.37 0.63 0.49 0.51 Jharkhand 0.13 0.87 0.13 0.86 Karnataka 0.43 0.57 0.45 0.55 Kerala 0.66 0.34 0.56 0.44 Madhya Pradesh 0.32 0.68 0.34 0.66 Maharastra 0.54 0.46 0.21 0.78 Orissa 0.66 0.34 0.49 0.51 Punjab 0.14 0.86 0.10 0.90 Rajasthan 0.50 0.50 0.47 0.53 Tamilnadu 0.64 0.36 0.41 0.59 Uttar Pradesh 0.14 0.86 0.08 0.92 Uttaranchal 0.11 0.89 0.40 0.60 West Bengal 0.26 0.74 0.16 0.84 India 0.34 0.66 0.20 0.80

Where do households seek care in villages that have a public MBBS doctor? Village has a Public MBBS Doctor Village has no Public MBBS Doctor Number of Villages with a Public MBBS Doctor Public Provider (%) Private Provider (%) Public Provider (%) Private Provider (%) Andhra Pradesh 0.18 0.82 0.22 0.78 10 Assam 0.89 0.11 0.65 0.35 4 Bihar 0.16 0.84 0.09 0.91 3 Chattisgarh 0.61 0.39 0.13 0.87 3 Gujarat 0.24 0.76 0.14 0.86 8 Haryana 0.27 0.67 0.23 0.77 4 Himachal Pradesh 0.50 0.50 0.42 0.58 4 Jharkhand - - 0.13 0.87 0 Karnataka 0.33 0.67 0.47 0.53 9 Kerala 0.63 0.37 0.64 0.36 31 Madhya Pradesh - - 0.33 0.67 1 Maharastra 0.62 0.38 0.25 0.75 2 Orissa 0.88 0.12 0.50 0.50 4 Punjab 0.13 0.87 0.11 0.89 13 Rajasthan 0.80 0.20 0.48 0.52 4 Tamilnadu 0.69 0.31 0.42 0.58 6 Uttar Pradesh 0.23 0.77 0.08 0.92 4 Uttaranchal - - 0.36 0.64 0 West Bengal 0.38 0.62 0.15 0.85 5 India 0.41 0.59 0.21 0.79 115

Vignettes

The Vignettes Sample (Villages) Number of Providers Number of Public Providers Public Doctors Nurses Others Some Degree No Degree Number of Private Providers Private Some Degree No Degree Andhra Pradesh 156 50 9 34 7 13 30 104 12 88 Assam 80 45 7 37 1 9 24 34 8 12 Bihar 166 7 2 5 0 4 2 157 19 117 Chattisgarh 136 40 15 18 7 13 23 93 26 59 Gujarat 118 69 10 43 16 10 49 48 35 6 Haryana 200 52 13 29 10 8 23 141 18 83 Himachal Pradesh 66 31 5 5 21 2 24 32 16 14 Jharkhand 118 17 3 12 2 8 6 96 16 65 Karnataka 85 39 11 28 0 8 28 41 27 10 Kerala 106 37 31 6 0 27 2 48 32 5 Madhya Pradesh 166 69 4 50 15 5 38 94 20 50 Maharastra 124 49 7 26 16 10 33 69 47 9 Orissa 115 45 14 22 9 14 22 68 10 48 Punjab 189 24 13 9 2 11 8 159 24 99 Rajasthan 142 61 24 34 3 22 21 81 19 45 Tamilnadu 75 52 3 48 1 7 30 20 6 6 Uttar Pradesh 194 18 9 8 1 4 9 174 26 117 Uttaranchal 110 44 5 39 0 6 27 65 14 39 West Bengal 364 52 10 38 4 10 39 310 65 208 India 2,710 801 195 491 115 191 438 1,834 440 1,080

Tuberculosis: Sputum Test for AFB

Pre-Eclampsia: Blood Pressure

Dysentery: Blood or Mucous in the Stool

Competence by Quintiles Mean Competence Least Competent -4.22 Second Quintile -0.99 Average Competence -0.05 Fourth Quintile 0.62 Most Competent 1.42

Correlation of Competence & Diagnosis Total History Questions Total Exams % Who Asked Relevant Question/Exam % of Providers who gave the Correct Diagnosis TUBERCULOSIS (Relevant Exam: Sputum Test) Least Competence 0.31 0.95 0.10 0.40 Second Quintile 0.91 1.87 0.27 0.62 Average Competence 1.22 2.34 0.38 0.72 Fourth Quintile 1.86 3.45 0.49 0.81 Highest Competence 2.66 4.88 0.59 0.89 Total 1.39 2.70 0.37 0.69 PREECLAMPSIA (Relevant Exam: Blood Pressure) Least Competence 0.75 0.59 0.15 0.14 Second Quintile 2.30 1.67 0.36 0.28 Average Competence 3.16 2.22 0.49 0.42 Fourth Quintile 4.97 3.46 0.62 0.62 Highest Competence 7.24 5.07 0.70 0.82 Total 3.68 2.60 0.46 0.46

Correlation of Competence & Diagnosis Total History Questions Total Exams % Who Asked Relevant Question/Exam % of Providers who gave the Correct Diagnosis DIARRHEA (Relevant Question: Blood/Mucous in Stool) Least Competence 0.47 0.30 0.06 0.74 Second Quintile 1.07 0.91 0.16 0.78 Average Competence 1.42 1.15 0.23 0.77 Fourth Quintile 1.95 2.10 0.34 0.82 Highest Competence 2.48 3.56 0.46 0.86 Total 1.48 1.60 0.25 0.79 DYSENTERY (Relevant Question: Blood/Mucous in Stool) Least Competence 0.46 0.31 0.07 0.27 Second Quintile 1.10 0.91 0.19 0.37 Average Competence 1.46 1.15 0.26 0.39 Fourth Quintile 2.00 2.08 0.38 0.56 Highest Competence 2.55 3.51 0.50 0.71 Total 1.51 1.59 0.28 0.46

Correlation of Competence & Diagnosis Competence quintile % of Providers who gave the Correct Diagnosis for all cases % of Providers who gave the Wrong Diagnosis for all cases Least Competence 3 40 Second Quintile 10 22 Average Competence 17 15 Fourth Quintile 34 7 Highest Competence 56 2 Total 24 17

Kerala Andhra Pradesh Karnataka Tamilnadu Rajasthan Maharastra Gujarat Assam Orissa West Bengal Haryana Madhya Pradesh Chattisgarh Uttaranchal Himachal Pradesh Punjab Jharkhand Bihar Uttar Pradesh How does competence vary across Competence (MLE) % who gave the correct diagnosis for all cases Andhra Pradesh 0.78 26 Assam -0.01 26 Bihar -2.15 3 Chattisgarh -0.87 22 Gujarat 0.14 56 Haryana -0.45 28 Himachal Pradesh -1.28 35 Jharkhand -1.81 6 Karnataka 0.68 40 Kerala 1.03 55 Madhya Pradesh -0.61 11 Maharastra 0.33 30 Orissa -0.01 23 Punjab -1.29 12 Rajasthan 0.54 42 Tamilnadu 0.66 72 Uttar Pradesh -2.39 5 Uttaranchal -1.02 5 West Bengal -0.27 12 India -0.60 24 states? competence 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00-0.50-1.00-1.50-2.00-2.50-3.00 Provider competence and % of providers giving correct diagnosis Competence (MLE) % correct diagnosis for all cases % of providers 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

Kerala Andhra Pradesh Karnataka Tamilnadu Rajasthan Maharastra Gujarat Assam Orissa West Bengal Haryana Madhya Pradesh Chattisgarh Uttaranchal Himachal Pradesh Punjab Jharkhand Bihar Uttar Pradesh How does competence vary across states? Competence (MLE) % who gave the wrong diagnosis for all cases Andhra Pradesh 0.78 11 Assam -0.01 10 Bihar -2.15 38 Chattisgarh -0.87 13 Gujarat 0.14 2 Haryana -0.45 13 Himachal Pradesh -1.28 8 Jharkhand -1.81 29 Karnataka 0.68 4 Kerala 1.03 2 Madhya Pradesh -0.61 14 Maharastra 0.33 10 Orissa -0.01 13 Punjab -1.29 25 Rajasthan 0.54 8 Tamilnadu 0.66 2 Uttar Pradesh -2.39 31 Uttaranchal -1.02 16 West Bengal -0.27 21 India -0.60 17 competence 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00-0.50-1.00-1.50-2.00-2.50-3.00 Provider competence and % of providers giving wrong diagnosis Competence (MLE) % of providers % wrong diagnosis for all cases 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

Competence by Qualification/Region? Degree type only Degree type and state fixed effects Degree type and SCR fixed effects Has MBBS 1.6199*** 1.0624*** 1.2475*** (0.2435) (0.2388) (0.2669) Has other degree 0.5425*** 0.3417*** 0.4349*** (0.1174) (0.1012) (0.1295) Adjusted R-squared 0.0326 0.2592 0.3176 No. obs. 4,565 4,565 4,565

The Vignettes Sample (PHC s) Number of Facilities Number of Providers Doctors Doctors MBBS Degree Other Degree Nurses and Other Providers Nurses and Other Providers Other Degree No Degree Andhra Pradesh 78 194 79 60 16 113 94 14 Assam 79 621 251 187 56 370 3 292 Bihar 79 365 168 149 16 195 140 44 Chattisgarh 75 214 108 39 62 103 43 50 Gujarat 79 244 106 59 46 135 100 17 Haryana 80 370 155 126 26 210 93 108 Himachal Pradesh 71 173 93 89 2 80 50 25 Jharkhand 78 330 143 128 10 184 149 19 Karnataka 76 190 78 50 25 112 100 8 Kerala 72 189 84 78 2 104 101 0 Madhya Pradesh 69 194 81 65 12 110 41 61 Maharastra 79 364 121 69 45 204 101 88 Orissa 80 246 151 79 70 95 72 21 Punjab 71 192 108 68 34 84 66 15 Rajasthan 80 432 133 87 42 294 256 23 Tamilnadu 80 299 76 59 14 223 185 26 Uttar Pradesh 59 175 103 61 42 71 50 19 Uttaranchal 56 179 96 59 37 82 64 15 West Bengal 77 321 114 99 15 205 199 2 India 1,418 5,292 2,248 1,611 572 2,974 1,907 847

How does competence vary by degree type by state?

Summary The average Indian village has SIX medical providers So access to healthcare per se is not poor Private unqualified providers are a very large part of the provider landscape (can t ignore them) They account for >75% of primary care (~2/3 even with a public doctor in the village; ~60% even with public MBBS) Overall quality of providers is quite low Only 24% of providers could diagnose all 3 cases right Very large regional variation in quality State fixed effects explain much more of the variation than even a formal MBBS qualification (variation in training quality/regulation?) First census of providers, and largest vignette study to date: aim to measure quality in an all-india representative sample Almost certainly an upper bound (based on SP evidence)