Kings Canyon Joint Unified

Similar documents
Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Shelters Elementary School

For international students wishing to study Japanese language at the Japanese Language Education Center in Term 1 and/or Term 2, 2017

Curriculum and Assessment Guide (CAG) Elementary California Treasures First Grade

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

African American Male Achievement Update

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

NCEO Technical Report 27

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

AB 167/216 Graduation. kids-alliance.org/programs/education. Alliance for Children s Rights

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Experience College- and Career-Ready Assessment User Guide

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Educational Attainment

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Kahului Elementary School

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

FeIL'1 Enactment Date:,2- io - ( C By: ----;1 >( DATE: February 10,2009!/

Bellevue University Admission Application

Raw Data Files Instructions

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. Eliminate Rule Instruction

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Deer Valley High School WASC MID CYCLE REPORT

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Sight Word Assessment

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

School Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide

Adver sing 2012 Graduate Survey

Appendix L: Online Testing Highlights and Script

12-month Enrollment

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

SER CHANGES~ACCOMMODATIONS PAGES

Mark Keppel High School

Executive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School

Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring SOSCA. Feedback Information

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Raising All Boats: Identifying and Profiling High- Performing California School Districts

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Organization Profile

ASMC PROGRAM REVIEW

School Action Plan: Template Overview

Long Beach Unified School District

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

State of New Jersey

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

CHANCERY SMS 5.0 STUDENT SCHEDULING

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Allowable Accommodations for Students with Disabilities

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FACT SHEET CALENDAR YEARS 2014 & TECHNOLOGIES - 45 Months. On Time Completion Rates (Graduation Rates)

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

Final. Developing Minority Biomedical Research Talent in Psychology: The APA/NIGMS Project

TRAVEL TIME REPORT. Casualty Actuarial Society Education Policy Committee October 2001

STUDENT APPLICATION FORM 2016

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Transcription:

Kings Canyon Joint Unified After School Program Report Card for This report describes the participants, participation levels, and outcomes of the after school program in Kings Canyon Joint Unified. Participant data includes the gender, ethnicity, English Learner (EL) status, and grade level of students. Outcomes measured include students performance on the English-Language Arts (ELA) and Math portions of the California Standards Test (CST), the ELA and Math portions of the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE), and change in regular school day attendance over the previous year. Relationships between after school program attendance and these key outcomes are examined. Section 1: Participation Demographics During the school year, a total of 3428 students participated in the after school program in Kings Canyon Joint Unified for at least one day. Participation levels are reported and compared by grade level in the next section of this report. Gender and Ethnicity 50.3% Gender Composition After School Participants Non-After School Participants 51.1% 49.7% 48.9% Ethnic Composition After School Participants Non-After School Participants 88.5% 83.1% Male Female 12.9% 8.8% 0.5% 1.3% 0.4% 0. 1.8% 2.6% Asian Black Hispanic White Other Figure 1 Figure 2 Grade Level and English Learner (EL) Status 30.8% 38.6% Grade Level Composition After School Participants Non-After School Participants 37.4% 44.9% 31.8% English Learner Composition After School Participants 42.6% 43.5% Non-After School Participants 57.4% 56.5% 16.6% K-3rd 4th-6th 7th-8th 9th-12th EL Non-EL Figure 3 Figure 4 Educational Resource Consultants Kings Canyon Joint Unified -- 1/18/2011 1

Grade Level Days Attended Section 2: After School Program Attendance in Each Program Attendance Category Figure 5 shows the percentage of students who fell within each of five attendance categories for the after school program ( days, days, days, days, or 120 days or more). At Kings Canyon Joint Unified, the largest percentage of students (36.3%) attended the after school program days. Number of Participants 3428 Participant Composition Gender EL Status Male 1725 EL 1415 Female 1703 Non-EL 1906 Not Reported 0 Not Reported 107 Grade Days Attended K-3 1057 : 1245 4-6 1282 : 621 7-8 1089 : 350 9-12 0 : 290 Not Reported 0 : 922 (n=922) (n=290) (n=350) (n=621) by Program Attendance Category (Overall) 8.5% 10.2% 18.1% 26.9% (n=1245) 36.3% 5% 1 15% 2 25% 3 35% 4 Figure 5 Number of Days Students Attended the After School Program In Kings Canyon Joint Unified, the average after school participant attended the program for approximately 71.9 days. The mean number of days that students attended the after school program is compared with the district mean and disaggregated by grade level in Figure 6. Mean Number of Days Students Attended the After School Program District (n=3428) 71.9 Grades 9-12 (n=0) Grades 7-8 (n=1089) 43.8 Grades 4-6 (n=1282) 71.9 Grades K-3 (n=1057) 100.7 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Mean Number of Days Attended Figure 6 Educational Resource Consultants Kings Canyon Joint Unified -- 1/18/2011 2

Days Section 3: Regular School Day Attendance Mean Change in Regular Day Attendance by After School Attendance Category The line graph in Figure 7 shows the relationship between change in regular school day attendance and attending the after school program. Changes in attendance from the baseline year are shown for each of five attendance categories. Changes represent the difference (+ or -) in the mean number of regular school days after school participants attended in when compared with the previous year. The green line indicates mean changes in regular day attendance for after school participants at Kings Canyon Joint Unified. Similar data is shown in blue for non-after school participants. +0.20 +0.00-0.20-0.40-0.60-0.80-1.00-1.20-1.40-1.17 n=1083 Mean Change in Regular School Day Attendance -0.69 n=583-0.22 n=317-0.04 n=271 +0.06 n=890-0.39 Days Attended After School Program Kings Canyon Joint Unified (n=3144) Non-After School Participants (n=4357) Figure 7 Section 4: Academic Achievement The relationship between program participation and academic achievement in English-Language Arts (ELA) and Math was analyzed using California Standards Test (CST) results from May 2010. Academic achievement was also measured using passing rates on the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) as outcomes. Method: CST Performance To determine the relationship between the CST achievement and after school program attendance, students were grouped into five categories based on the number of days they attended the after school program ( days, days, days, days, and days). The percentage of students scoring at the proficient and advanced level was calculated within and compared among each of the five categories. CST English-Language Arts (ELA) The green line in Figure 8 shows the relationship between performance on the ELA portion of the CST and attending the after school program. The blue line indicates the same information for non-after school participants. Educational Resource Consultants Kings Canyon Joint Unified -- 1/18/2011 3

Scoring Proficient or Advanced Mean CST Scale Score 355 Mean CST-ELA Scale Score by Program Attendance Category 350 345 340 335 346.1 342.0 339.5 336.9 333.9 346.6 330 325 n=1052 n=549 n=289 n=249 Kings Canyon Joint Unified (n=2904) Days Attended the After School Program Non-After School Participants (n=1977) Figure 8 The bar graph in Figure 9 shows the percentage of Kings Canyon Joint Unified after school participants who scored proficient or advanced on the May 2010 CST ELA portion by program attendance category. Scores were available for 2904 students in grades 2-11 who took the CST. 5 4 3 2 1 CST-ELA Proficient and Advanced by Program Attendance Category 50.7% 44.2% 41.3% 38.8% 35.3% 45.9% 0 (Non-ASP) n=1977 n=1052 n=549 n=289 Days Attended the After School Program n=249 Figure 9 CST Math The green line in Figure 10 shows the relationship between performance on the Math portion of the CST and attending the after school program. The blue line indicates the same information for non-after school participants. Educational Resource Consultants Kings Canyon Joint Unified -- 1/18/2011 4

Scoring Proficient or Advanced Mean CST Scale Score 385 380 375 370 365 360 355 350 345 340 335 Mean CST-Math Scale Score by Program Attendance Category 349.9 n=1045 351.9 346.7 349.5 n=545 n=288 n=248 Days Attended After School Program Kings Canyon Joint Unified (n=2891) 372.8 Non-After School Participants (n=1974) 363.5 Figure 10 The bar graph in Figure 11 shows the percentage of Kings Canyon Joint Unified after school participants who scored proficient or advanced on the May 2010 CST Math portion by program attendance category. Scores were available for 2891 students in grades 2-11 who took the CST. 7 CST-Math Performance by Program Attendance Category 5 4 54.1% 45.9% 48.4% 44.4% 46. 59.3% 3 2 1 0 (Non-ASP) n=1974 n=1045 n=545 n=288 Days Attended the After School Program n=248 Figure 11 Educational Resource Consultants Kings Canyon Joint Unified -- 1/18/2011 5

Passing the CAHSEE-Math Passing the CAHSEE-ELA Method: CAHSEE Passing Rate The percentages of students passing the CAHSEE in ELA and Math were compared between after school program participants and non-participants at two grade levels (10 th and 11 th grade) Unduplicated passing rates were used, meaning that each student was counted as either passing or not passing the CAHSEE one time during regardless of the number of actual attempts. CAHSEE English-Language Arts Figure 12 compares the passing rates of after school participants on the ELA portion of the CAHSEE with the passing rates of non-participants. It should be noted that after school participants are more likely to need assistance in passing the CAHSEE. 10 8 4 2 Passing the CAHSEE-ELA 76.7% 34.2% n=0 n=14136 n=0 n=5509 10th Grade After School Participants County-Wide Average 11th Grade Figure 12 CAHSEE Math Figure 13 compares the passing rates of after school participants on the Math portion of the CAHSEE with the passing rates of non-participants. It should be noted that after school participants are more likely to need assistance in passing the CAHSEE. 10 8 4 2 Passing the CAHSEE-Math 78.2% 34.7% n=0 n=14071 n=0 n=4987 10th Grade After School Participants 11th Grade County-Wide Average Figure 13 Educational Resource Consultants Kings Canyon Joint Unified -- 1/18/2011 6

Change in CST Performance Band Figure 12 shows the change in students CST performance band in English-Language Arts and Math between May of 2009 and May of 2010. The column on the far left shows the number of students scoring in each performance band in May 2009. The colored columns show the performance bands attained by these same students in May 2010. Numbers in the area shaded green indicate students scoring in a higher performance band than in the previous year. Numbers in the blue shaded area indicate students scoring in the same performance band as the previous year. Numbers in the pink shaded area indicates students scoring in a lower performance band than in the previous year. Also shown are the percentages of students who decreased, maintained, or increased their performance band from the previous year. Only students for whom two years of CST data were available are included in this analysis. ** Percentages in parentheses (%) indicate the change in CST Performance Band of non-after school participants at the same school. = Decreased level = Maintained same level = Improved level 2009 Performance Level English-Language Arts 2010 FBB BB B PRO ADV % Decrease % Maintain % Increase FBB (n=208) 61 89 39 13 6 N/A 29.3% (39.8%) 70.7% (60.2%) BB (n=376) 39 150 158 23 6 10.4% (14.) 39.9% (32.9%) 49.7% (53.1%) B (n=886) 39 127 465 225 30 18.7% (15.2%) 52.5% (51.6%) 28.8% (33.3%) PRO (n=690) 3 17 163 369 138 26.5% (19.1%) 53.5% (51.4%) 20. (29.5%) ADV (n=243) 0 0 8 75 160 34.2% (27.5%) 65.8% (72.5%) N/A Overall (n=2403) 19.6% (16.6%) 50.1% (50.5%) 30.3% (32.9%) 2009 Performance Level Math 2010 FBB BB B PRO ADV % Decrease % Maintain % Increase FBB (n=139) 36 68 25 6 4 N/A 25.9% (40.) 74.1% (60.) BB (n=460) 45 197 152 60 6 9.8% (7.7%) 42.8% (38.2%) 47.4% (54.1%) B (n=703) 17 131 293 216 46 21.1% (16.) 41.7% (45.2%) 37.3% (38.8%) PRO (n=703) 6 33 172 338 154 30. (34.3%) 48.1% (42.9%) 21.9% (22.8%) ADV (n=409) 0 3 17 126 263 35.7% (34.6%) 64.3% (65.4%) N/A Overall (n=2414) 22.8% (23.7%) 46.7% (47.7%) 30.5% (28.6%) Figure 14 Educational Resource Consultants Kings Canyon Joint Unified -- 1/18/2011 7