Official Grade: A A Without Waiver Grade: B ** 4-Year Graduation Rate:

Similar documents
Shelters Elementary School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Evaluation of Teach For America:

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

State of New Jersey

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

NCEO Technical Report 27

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

El Toro Elementary School

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

UTAH PARTICIPATION AND ACCOMMODATIONS POLICY

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Educational Attainment

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

African American Male Achievement Update

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

HIGH SCHOOL PREP PROGRAM APPLICATION For students currently in 7th grade

QUESTIONS and Answers from Chad Rice?

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

INTRODUCTION ( MCPS HS Course Bulletin)

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

A Correlational Study Between The Amount Of Property Wealth Behind Each Student Attending Florida District Schools And The Acade

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Hokulani Elementary School

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Executive Summary. Gautier High School

Kahului Elementary School

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

World s Best Workforce Plan

FOUR STARS OUT OF FOUR

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Diablo Vista Middle 1

University of Arizona

State Parental Involvement Plan

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

Robert Bennis Elementary School

Estimating the Cost of Meeting Student Performance Standards in the St. Louis Public Schools

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

AB 167/216 Graduation. kids-alliance.org/programs/education. Alliance for Children s Rights

Why OUT-OF-LEVEL Testing? 2017 CTY Johns Hopkins University

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

Idaho Public Schools

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

Information Packet. Home Education ELC West Amelia Street Orlando, FL (407) FAX: (407)

Status of Latino Education in Massachusetts: A Report

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Transcription:

Itawamba County School District (2900) Tremont Attendance Center (2900028) The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) requires each state to use a unified accountability model. School, district, and state report cards that contain the following accountability information must be produced and made available publicly. 1 No Child Left Behind 2013-2014 School Report Card Mississippi Statewide Accountability System The Mississippi Statewide Accountability System (MSAS) is a single A through F school and district accountability system based on the requirements of Federal law under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Flexibility Request and Mississippi Code 37-17-6. The MSAS assigns performance classifications based on 1) student achievement, 2) student growth, and 3) graduation, if applicable. For the 2013-2014 school year, the U. S. Department of Education granted Mississippi a one-year waiver from school performance classifications due to the implementation of Mississippi s College and Career Readiness Standards. The waiver allowed districts and schools to retain the letter grade received in the 2012-2013 school year if the 2013-2014 grade was lower as a result of assessment results. ent Official Grade: A A Without Waiver Grade: B ** 4- Graduation Rate: 78.3 94.2 Notes: Only districts and schools serving grade 1 or higher or higher are eligible to receive a performance classification. The Without Waiver Grade only applies the 2013-2014 school year. Possible Accountability Status: A, B, C, D, F. (N/A The school did not receive a performance classification due to not having available data.) ESEA Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) A district or school is responsible for meeting annual measurable objectives (AMO) in three areas: Reading/Language Arts,, and a third academic indicator referred to as the Other Academic Indicator. The Other Academic Indicator for schools and districts without a grade 12 is the attendance rate. For schools and districts with a grade 12, the indicator is the graduation rate. If a district or school does not meet an AMO in any one of the three areas, the district or school is considered to have not met AMOs. ent District AMO Status: Not Met Not Met Reading/Language Arts Status: Not Met Not Met Status: Not Met Not Met Other Academic Indicator Status: Met Met Differentiated Accountability Label: Not Meeting AMOs On Target Student Groups AMO Subgroup Results Reading/ Language Arts Other Academic Indicator Graduation Rate ent Attendance Rate All Students: Not Met Not Met Met 78.3 94.2 95 Students with IEPs: ** ** ** ** ** ** Limited English : ** ** ** ** ** ** Economically Disadvantaged: Not Met Not Met ** 76.8 ** ** Asian: ** ** ** ** ** ** Black: ** ** ** ** ** ** Hispanic: ** ** ** ** ** ** Native American: ** ** ** ** ** ** White: Not Met Not Met ** 78.3 94 **

Quality NCLB Measures Number percent is based on Core s Who Are Highly Qualified: 100 18 FTE s s with Emergency/Provisional Certification: 0 18 FTE s Courses Taught by a Highly Qualified : 100 130 Courses Courses NOT Taught by a Highly Qualified : 0 130 Courses and course counts reflect NCLB core academic subjects only. These counts represent the denominators for calculating the percentage values. counts are based on Full-Time Equivalents (FTE). Assessment Participation Rates While NCLB requires the testing participation rates of the following groups of students to be reported in Reading/Language Arts,, and Science, not all subgroups are considered separately when determining whether a school met its annual measurable objectives (AMOs). Additionally, although NCLB requires the reporting of participation rates for the Science assessment, the results of the Science assessment are NOT used in AMO calculations. For those groups of students used in AMO calculations, NCLB requires that a minimum of 95% of all students in the group must be tested. Student groups used in AMO calculations Reading/Language Arts Science All Students: 95 95 95 Students with IEPs: 95 95 ** Limited English : ** ** ** Economically Disadvantaged: 95 95 95 Asian: ** ** ** Black ** ** ** Hispanic: ** ** ** Native American: ** ** ** Student groups not used in AMO calculations White: 95 95 95 Migrant: ** ** ** Male: 95 95 95 Female: 95 95 95 Exemption of Recently-Arrived Limited English- Students from State Assessments NCLB allows for a one-time exemption of language arts and/or mathematics scores for recently-arrived limited English proficient (LEP) students. A recently arrived LEP student is defined as an LEP student who has attended schools in the United States (not including Puerto Rico) for less than 12 months. Number of recently-arrived LEP students exempted from state assessments: ** 2

State Assessment Number Tested and Performance by Level Grade Level Number Tested Minimal Basic Advanced Mississippi iculum Test, 2 nd Edition Language Arts 3 21 30 147.8 154 19 5 43 37 29 37 10 23 4 20 24 152.6 147.2 10 17 30 33 40 46 20 5 5 11 19 155.7 151.9 5 16 9 16 82 68 9 5 6 23 15 154.7 157.3 5 5 17 20 61 67 17 13 7 23 25 148.3 156.1 17 5 17 24 65 56 5 16 8 16 24 152.1 152.4 13 5 19 21 56 75 13 5 Mississippi iculum Test, 2 nd Edition 3 21 30 152.3 157 5 10 43 17 43 43 10 30 4 20 24 155.4 152.4 5 5 15 33 70 54 10 8 5 11 19 159.6 155.1 5 16 9 5 64 63 27 16 6 23 15 158.9 157.1 5 5 13 13 52 73 30 13 7 23 25 153.2 161.5 9 5 30 5 48 56 13 40 8 16 24 159.3 156 6 13 6 8 56 50 31 29 Grade 5 and 8 Science Tests 5 11 19 154.4 158 9 5 9 5 64 37 18 53 8 16 24 155.9 153.1 5 5 25 29 50 54 25 17 Subject Number Tested Passing High School Subject Area Tests 3 Minimal Basic Advanced Algebra I 31 34 95 95 661.4 658.5 5 5 5 6 45 59 52 35 Biology I 32 31 93.8 93.6 656.1 656.9 5 5 22 16 63 55 16 26 English II 21 31 71.4 80.7 650.7 652.5 10 6 33 39 48 35 10 19 U.S. History 35 22 93.8 77.3 651.9 648.6 6 23 14 9 66 55 14 14 National Assessment of Educational Progress The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) provides results on subject-matter achievement. NAEP does not provide scores for individual students, schools, or school districts. NAEP results are based on representative samples of students in grades 4 and 8. The NAEP is administered every two years; the most recent results are reported below. 2013 Reading Results 2013 Results At or Above Basic At or Above At or Above Basic At or Above Grade MS U.S. MS U.S. MS U.S. MS U.S. MS U.S. MS U.S. 4 209 223 43 23 43 23 234 234 23 43 23 21 8 209 223 43 23 43 23 234 234 23 43 23 21

Grade/Subject All Students Disabled Only Limited English Economically Disadvantaged Asian Black Hispanic Native American White Female Male Migrant Grade/Subject All Students Disabled Only Limited English Economically Disadvantaged Asian Black Hispanic Native American White Female Male Migrant of Students and Above 2013-2014 Assessments Mississippi iculum Test, 2 nd Edition Language Arts Mississippi iculum Test, 2 nd Edition 3 62 67 ** 52 ** ** ** ** 62 62 63 ** 3 76 67 ** 67 ** ** ** ** 76 77 75 ** 4 48 20 ** 42 ** ** 5 ** 50 46 50 ** 4 65 60 ** 58 ** ** 5 ** 68 69 60 ** 5 70 5 ** 75 ** ** ** ** 70 77 57 ** 5 75 5 ** 88 ** ** ** ** 75 77 71 ** 6 80 5 ** 46 ** ** ** ** 80 88 71 ** 6 87 95 ** 95 ** ** ** ** 87 88 86 ** 7 69 5 ** 46 ** ** 5 ** 72 64 75 ** 7 92 50 ** 85 ** ** 95 ** 92 95 83 ** 8 75 50 ** 76 ** ** ** ** 75 91 62 ** 8 79 38 ** 82 ** ** ** ** 79 73 85 ** Extended iculum Frameworks Language Arts Extended iculum Frameworks 3 73 67 ** 64 ** ** ** ** 73 77 71 ** 3 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 4 63 60 ** 55 ** ** 5 ** 65 69 55 ** 4 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 5 79 5 ** 88 ** ** ** ** 79 83 71 ** 5 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 6 87 5 ** 95 ** ** ** ** 87 88 86 ** 6 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 7 95 50 ** 92 ** ** 5 ** 95 95 91 ** 7 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 8 79 38 ** 82 ** ** ** ** 79 73 85 ** 8 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Grades 5 and 8 Science Tests Extended iculum Frameworks Science 5 89 5 ** 88 ** ** ** ** 89 83 95 ** 5 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 8 71 38 ** 71 ** ** ** ** 71 73 69 ** 8 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Algebra I Biology I English II U.S. History High School Subject Area Tests Extended iculum Frameworks Secondary 95 95 ** 92 ** ** ** ** 95 94 95 ** Math ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 70 95 ** 50 ** ** ** ** 70 75 64 ** Science ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 53 5 ** 31 ** ** ** ** 53 53 54 ** 68 5 ** 33 ** ** ** ** 68 43 80 ** Language Arts ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 4

ESEA Annual Measurable Objective NCLB requires the reporting of the results of a district or school in meeting annual measurable objectives (AMO) in Reading/Language Arts and by subgroup. The results are shown below. The Achievement Index assigns one point for students scoring and Advanced and a half point for students scoring Basic. The AMOs were established based on student performance in 2010/2011. Reading/Language Arts N-Count Achievement Index ESEA AMO N-Count Achievement Index ESEA AMO All students: 157 79.3 84 153 90.2 91 Students with IEPs: 19 60.5 ** 19 71.1 ** Limited English : ** ** ** ** ** ** Economically Disadvantaged: 94 74.5 81 91 87.4 89 Asian: ** ** ** ** ** ** Black: ** ** ** ** ** ** Hispanic: ** ** ** ** ** ** Native American: ** ** ** ** ** ** White: 155 79.7 84 151 90.4 91 5

Notes: 2013-2014 No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Report Card User Guide ent ( ) represents the results of the 2013-2014 school year. represents the results of the 2012-2013 school year. The asterisks (**) indicate no data is being reported in the section due to one of the following: o Small n-size (<10 students in the measure) or o The measurement is not applicable to the school, district, or state. Data has been suppressed for values that are less than five percent (<5%) and greater than ninety-five percent (>95%). These values are reported as 5% and 95%, respectively. The sum of data reported in percentages may not equal to one hundred percent (100%) due to suppression rules applied. State Accountability Information Official Grade Official performance classification (A, B, C, D, or F) assigned to the district or school Note: For the 2014 school year, the U.S. Department of Education approved a oneyear waiver which allowed districts and schools to receive the higher performance classification between the 2013 and 2014 results. Without Waiver Grade 4- Graduation Rate Performance classification assigned to the district or school before the waiver option being applied Note: This option did not apply to the 2013 Accountability Results. age of students earning a regular high school diploma within 4 years after entering the 9 th grade for the first time. ESEA Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) ESEA Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Annual performance targets districts and schools must meet in order to ensure students are on a timeline for scoring 100 percent (100%) proficient by the 2019-2020 school year Differentiated Accountability Label Federal accountability label assigned to Title I schools based on the school s overall performance. This indicator is applied to Title I schools only. NCLB Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) Subgroup Results Reading/Language Indicator of whether the student subgroup Arts met its annual measurable objective in reading/language arts Other Academic Indicator Graduation Rate (4- Graduation Rate) Indicator of whether the student subgroup met its annual measurable objective in mathematics Indicator of whether the student subgroup met its other academic indicator (OAI) target; For elementary and middle schools, the OAI is the attendance rate. For high schools and districts, the OAI is the graduation rate. age of students earning a regular high school diploma within 4 years after entering the 9 th grade for the first time. District/School AMO Status Reading/Language Arts AMO Status Indicator of whether the district or school met its AMO targets for the school year. The district or school must meet AMOs in reading/language arts, mathematics, and the other academic indicator in order to meet its AMOs Indicator of whether the district or school met its reading/language arts AMO targets for the school year Attendance Rate Core s Who Are Highly Qualified age of students in attendance at school during the school year. Quality age of teachers in core subject area courses (e.g., English, math, science, etc.) who met the definition of highly qualified as outlined in NCLB AMO Status Indicator of whether the district or school met its mathematics AMO targets for the school year s with Emergency/Provisi onal Certification age of teachers with emergency or provisional certifications Other Academic Indicator Status Indicator of whether the school or district met its other academic indicator (OAI) target for the school year. For elementary and middle schools, the OAI target is the attendance rate. For high schools and districts, the OAI is the graduation rate. Courses Taught by a Highly Qualified age of courses taught by highly qualified teachers 6

Courses Not Taught by a Highly Qualified age of Courses in the Highest-Poverty Quartile Schools Not Taught by a Highly Qualified age of Courses in the Lowest-Poverty Quartile Schools Not Taught by a Highly Qualified Highly Qualified Full Time Equivalency (FTE) Participation Rate age of courses not taught by highly qualified teachers age of courses not taught by highly qualified teachers in schools where the poverty level ranked in the top 25% of all schools in the State age of courses not taught by highly qualified teachers in schools where the poverty level ranked in the lowest 25% of all schools in the State A teacher who holds certification in the course area in which the teacher is providing instruction Full time employees Assessment Participation Rates age of students within the student subgroup who participated in the reading/language arts, mathematics, and science assessments Exemption of Recently-Arrived Limited English- Pr0ficient Students Number of Recently-Arrived LEP Students Exempted from State Assessments Number of limited English proficient students who have been attending school within the United States for less than 12 months and had their assessment scores excluded from the state, district, or school accountability results State Assessment Number Tested and Performance by Level Number Tested Number of students participating in the reading/language arts, mathematics, science, and U.S. History assessments at each grade level Average scale score earned by students participating in the reading/language arts, mathematics, science, and U.S. History assessments at each grade level Minimal Basic Advanced The percentage of students scoring minimal on the reading/language arts, mathematics, science, and U.S. History assessments at each grade level The percentage of students scoring basic on the reading/language arts, mathematics, science, and U.S. History assessments at each grade level The percentage of students scoring proficient on the reading/language arts, mathematics, science, and U.S. History assessments at each grade level The percentage of students scoring advanced on the reading/language arts, mathematics, science, and U.S. History assessments at each grade level National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Note: The NAEP assessment is a national assessment administered at least once every two years to students in Grades 4 and 8. At or Above Basic At or Above Average scale score earned by students participating in the NAEP reading and mathematics assessments age of students scoring Basic or above on the NAEP Reading and assessments age of students scoring or above on the NAEP Reading and assessments of Students and Above Students and Above N-Count Achievement Index ESEA AMO age of students within the student subgroup scoring proficient or above on the reading/language arts, mathematics, science and U.S. History assessments ESEA Annual Measurable Objective Number of students within the student subgroup who are included in the achievement index calculation age of students moving towards or scoring proficient in reading/language arts and mathematics. The achievement index is the measure used in determining whether the student subgroup met its AMO target. Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) is the annual performance target the student subgroup must meet 7