School Summary Report

School Summary Report District: School: AUN: Test Date: Number of Students Tested: CENTRAL VALLEY SD CENTRAL VALLEY HS 704003-000008044 Winter 03/04 Content Area: Dear School Leader: This report provides valuable information about your school s performance on the Pennsylvania Keystone Exams. The report is designed to give you an overview of how your students performance compares to the performance of students in your district and statewide, in-depth results by student group, and data on your school s achievement by assessment anchor. Please use this report and detailed supporting materials on the Pennsylvania Department of Education Standards Aligned System website (www.pdesas.org) to help you and your staff continuously improve your school. Our mutual goal is to enable all students to become lifelong learners and reach their full potential. Sincerely, About the Keystone Exams The Keystone Exams are end-of-course assessments designed to assess performance in the content areas of, Biology, and Literature. Keystone Exam results will help determine whether a student has mastered the standards associated with earning a high school diploma. The Keystone Exams are taken by students in grade to meet the federal accountability requirement for high schools. Students not in grade who have completed a Keystone-related course may also take a Keystone Exam and have their scores banked for accountability reporting until they are in grade. The Keystone Exams are offered in both paper/pencil and online formats. Keystone Exams are one component of Pennsylvania s system of high school graduation requirements affecting students in the class of 07 and beyond. These tests were developed by Pennsylvania educators and are aligned to the standards adopted by the Pennsylvania State Board of Education. The results help students, parents, and educators understand how well we are meeting rigorous expectations for student achievement in core subject areas. For more information about the Keystone Exams, please contact the Pennsylvania Department of Education or visit www.pdesas.org. Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D. Acting Secretary of Education Winter 03/04 Page

KEYSTONE EXAMS ITEMS Common items within a content area are administered to all eligible students regardless of the exam form they are assigned. Only the common items are used in determining students' scores and their corresponding performance levels. This practice ensures all students are evaluated using the same set of items. Field Test items vary between forms. These items are included only as a means for gathering statistical information about an item that might be used in a future assessment. Field Test items are not included in the results of students, schools, or the district. KEYSTONE EXAMS SCORES The Keystone Exam score is a scale score computed from the number of points a student receives on the exam (i.e., raw score). For every possible raw score on an exam form, there is a corresponding scale score. Most state testing programs use scale scores for reporting purposes. A given scale score has the same interpretation regardless of the length or difficulty of the exam. For example, a scale score of 300 always implies the same level of student performance and always falls in the same performance level. The student's Keystone Exam scale score is used to identify the student's performance level. The items on the Keystone Exams change with each administration, but they continue to measure the same Assessment Anchors and Eligible Content. KEYSTONE EXAMS PERFORMANCE LEVELS : Superior academic performance indicating an in-depth understanding and exemplary display of the skills included in the Keystone Exams Assessment Anchors and Eligible Content. : Satisfactory academic performance indicating a solid understanding and adequate display of the skills included in the Keystone Exams Assessment Anchors and Eligible Content. : Marginal academic performance indicating work approaching, but not yet reaching, satisfactory performance. Performance indicates a partial understanding and limited display of the skills included in the Keystone Exams Assessment Anchors and Eligible Content. The student may need additional instructional opportunities and/or increased student academic commitment to achieve the level. Below : Inadequate academic performance indicating little understanding and minimal display of the skills included in the Keystone Exams Assessment Anchors and Eligible Content. There is a major need for additional instructional opportunities and/or increased student academic commitment to achieve the level. KEYSTONE EXAMS ASSESSMENT ANCHORS AND ELIGIBLE CONTENT The Keystone Exams Assessment Anchors and Eligible Content are designed to clarify the Academic Standards that may be assessed in the Keystone Exams. An Assessment Anchor is reported only if five or more possible points come from items aligned with the Assessment Anchor. Results based on fewer than five items are not considered statistically reliable. Winter 03/04 Page

School Summary Report District: School: AUN: Test Date: Number of Students Tested: CENTRAL VALLEY SD CENTRAL VALLEY HS 704003-000008044 Winter 03/04 Content Area: Performance Level Summary: All Testers Total Tested Below Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Percentages by Performance Level Percentage of Students Below and in Percentage of Students and in School: All Testers 4 6.3 44 64.9 60 7.0 4.8 64.9 7.0 8.8 District: All Testers 4 6.3 44 64.9 60 7.0 4.8 64.9 7.0 8.8 State: All Testers 99,604 5,009 5. 58,65 58.9 0,769 0.9 5,75 5. 58.9 0.9 6.0 If a percentage is not displayed within the bar graph, consult the table for the actual percentage. Summaries are based on students' highest scores to date. Please note that the percentages in the table may not add up to 00 due to rounding. 00 50 0 50 00 Winter 03/04 Page 3

School Summary Report District: School: AUN: Test Date: Number of Students Tested: CENTRAL VALLEY SD CENTRAL VALLEY HS 704003-000008044 Winter 03/04 Content Area: Performance Level Summary: First-Time Testers Total Tested Below Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Percentages by Performance Level Percentage of Students Below and in Percentage of Students and in School: First-Time Testers District: First-Time Testers State: First-Time Testers 50 3 6.0 30 60.0 6 3.0.0 50 3 6.0 30 60.0 6 3.0.0 0,69 3,8 8.4 7,90 35. 5,437 6.3 4,54 0. 60.0 3.0 34.0 60.0 3.0 34.0 35. 6.3 0. 46.4 If a percentage is not displayed within the bar graph, consult the table for the actual percentage. Summaries are based on students' highest scores to date. Please note that the percentages in the table may not add up to 00 due to rounding. 00 50 0 50 00 Winter 03/04 Page 4

School Summary Report District: School: AUN: Test Date: Number of Students Tested: CENTRAL VALLEY SD CENTRAL VALLEY HS 704003-000008044 Winter 03/04 Content Area: Performance Level Summary: Retesters Total Tested Below Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Percentages by Performance Level Percentage of Students Below and in Percentage of Students and in School: Retesters 7 6.4 4 66.3 44 5.6 3.7 66.3 5.6 7.3 District: Retesters 7 6.4 4 66.3 44 5.6 3.7 66.3 5.6 7.3 State: Retesters 78,9,98 4. 5,36 65. 5,33 9.4,0.3 65. 9.4 0.7 If a percentage is not displayed within the bar graph, consult the table for the actual percentage. Summaries are based on students' highest scores to date. Please note that the percentages in the table may not add up to 00 due to rounding. 00 50 0 50 00 Winter 03/04 Page 5

Performance Level Summary by Group: All Testers Below School District State Below Below Percentages by Performance Level Percentage of Students Below and in Percentage of Students and in All Testers 4 44 60 4 4 44 60 4 5,009 58,65 0,769 5,75 6.3 64.9 7.0.8 6.3 64.9 7.0.8 5. 58.9 0.9 5. School 64.9 7.0 8.8 District 64.9 7.0 8.8 State 58.9 0.9 6.0 GENDER Female Male 3 67 3 3 67 3 6,68 9,63 0,36,4.9 65.0 3..0.9 65.0 3..0 3.6 60.4. 4.9 77 8 3 77 8 3 8,9 8,955 0,39,747 9. 64.7 3.5.5 9. 64.7 3.5.5 6.5 57.5 0.6 5.5 School 65.0 3. 3.0 District 65.0 3. 3.0 State 60.4. 6.0 School 64.7 3.5 6. District 64.7 3.5 6. State 57.5 0.6 6. IEP-Special Education 9 0 9 0 6,584 9,476,5 46 40.9 50.0 9. 0.0 40.9 50.0 9. 0.0 37.7 54.3 7. 0.8 School 40.9 50.0 9. District 40.9 50.0 9. State 37.7 54.3 8.0 PROGRAM STATUS Migrant Education Program Economically Disadvantaged English Language Learner 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 33.3 58.3 8.3 0.0 9 57 4 9 57 4 0,533 8,84 6,487 867.0 69.5 7..4.0 69.5 7..4.8 6.3 4.0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0,588,79 78 38 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 5.5 4.5 5.8. State 33.3 58.3 8.3 School 69.5 9.5 District 69.5 9.5 State.8 6.3 5.9 School 00 0.0 District 00 0.0 State 5.5 4.5 7.0 Historically Underperforming 6 5 6 5,88 33,400 7,385,009 3. 68. 6.5. 3. 68. 6.5. 3.5 6. 3.5.8 School 68. 8.7 District 68. 8.7 State 3.5 6. 5.4 00 50 0 50 00 Winter 03/04 Page 6

Performance Level Summary by Group: All Testers (Continued) Below School District State Below Below Percentages by Performance Level Percentage of Students Below and in Percentage of Students and in American Indian/ Alaskan Native (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 78 9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8. 59..0 0.8 State 59..0.7 Asian (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0 0 0 47,090 586 55 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 5.8 4.. 0.9 School 00 0.0 District 00 0.0 State 4.. 0.9 43.0 Black or African American (not Hispanic) 7 3 0 7 3 0 5,474,445,939 06 9. 63.6 7.3 0.0 9. 63.6 7.3 0.0 8.7 60.0 0.. School 63.6 7.3 7.3 District 63.6 7.3 7.3 State 8.7 60.0.3 RACE/ETHNICITY Hispanic (any race) Multi-Racial/Two or more races (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0,64 5,789,3 89 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 6.6 58. 3.3.9 0 4 0 0 4 0 87,07 39 64 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 6. 6.3 8.0 3.6 School 50.0 50.0 50.0 District 50.0 50.0 50.0 State 6.6 58. 5. School 33.3 66.7 66.7 District 33.3 66.7 66.7 State 6.3.6 White (not Hispanic) 3 33 5 4 3 33 5 4 6,9 39,038 6,539 4,49 6.4 65.8 5.7.0 6.4 65.8 5.7.0 9.3 59.3 5. 6.3 School 65.8 5.7 7.7 District 65.8 5.7 7.7 State 59.3 5. 3.4 Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 8 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.3 48.6 5.7.4 State 48.6 5.7 37. If a percentage is not displayed within the bar graph, consult the table for the actual percentage. Summaries are based on students' highest scores to date. Please note that the percentages in the table may not add up to 00 due to rounding. 00 50 0 50 00 Winter 03/04 Page 7

Performance Level Summary by Group: First-Time Testers Below School District State Below Below Percentages by Performance Level Percentage of Students Below and in Percentage of Students and in First-Time Testers 3 30 6 3 30 6 3,8 7,90 5,437 4,54 6.0 60.0 3.0.0 6.0 60.0 3.0.0 8.4 35. 6.3 0. School 60.0 3.0 34.0 District 60.0 3.0 34.0 State 35. 6.3 0. 46.4 GENDER Female Male 6 8 0 6 8 0,78 3,673,763,966 4.0 64.0 3.0 0.0 4.0 64.0 3.0 0.0 7. 36.3 7.3 9.4 4 8 4 8,053 3,575,665,83 8.0 56.0 3.0 4.0 8.0 56.0 3.0 4.0 9.6 34. 5.4 0.8 School 64.0 3.0 3.0 District 64.0 3.0 3.0 State 36.3 7.3 9.4 46.7 School 56.0 3.0 36.0 District 56.0 3.0 36.0 State 9.6 34. 5.4 0.8 46.3 IEP-Special Education 0 0,607,05 63 04 40.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 53. 34.7 8.7 3.4 School 40.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 District 40.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 State 53. 34.7. PROGRAM STATUS Migrant Education Program Economically Disadvantaged English Language Learner 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 77.8. 0.0 0.0 9 3 0 9 3 0,409 3,090,449 6 7.7 69. 3. 0.0 7.7 69. 3. 0.0 3.9 40.9 9. 8. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 68 9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 59.9 7.5 8.8 3.8 State 77.8. 0.0 School 69. 3. 3. District 69. 3. 3. State 3.9 40.9 9. 7.3 State 59.9 7.5.6 Historically Underperforming 0 4 0 0 4 0 3, 3,747,66 79.5 6.5 5.0 0.0.5 6.5 5.0 0.0 33.7 40.6 8.0 7.8 School 6.5 5.0 5.0 District 6.5 5.0 5.0 State 33.7 40.6 5.8 00 50 0 50 00 Winter 03/04 Page 8

Performance Level Summary by Group: First-Time Testers (Continued) Below School District State Below Below Percentages by Performance Level Percentage of Students Below and in Percentage of Students and in American Indian/ Alaskan Native (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 6 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.0 45.7 34.3 0.0 State 0.0 45.7 34.3 34.3 Asian (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 38 480 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A.0 7.5 3.4 47. State 3.4 47. 70.5 Black or African American (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0 0 0,06,48 366 3 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 38. 43. 3.7 5.0 School 00 0.0 District 00 0.0 State 38. 43. 8.7 RACE/ETHNICITY Hispanic (any race) Multi-Racial/Two or more races (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0 0 0 744 90 395 53 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 33.8 4.3 7.9 6.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 4 98 54 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0. 35.8 8.3 5.6 School 00 00 District 00 00 State 33.8 4.3 4.9 School 00 0.0 District 00 0.0 State 0. 35.8 8.3 43.9 White (not Hispanic) 3 8 5 3 8 5,89 4,856 4,309 3,33 6.4 59.6 3.9. 6.4 59.6 3.9..7 33.9 30. 3. School 59.6 3.9 34.0 District 59.6 3.9 34.0 State 33.9 30. 3. 53.3 Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.3 37.9 7.6 4. State 37.9 7.6 4. 5.7 If a percentage is not displayed within the bar graph, consult the table for the actual percentage. Summaries are based on students' highest scores to date. Please note that the percentages in the table may not add up to 00 due to rounding. 00 50 0 50 00 Winter 03/04 Page 9

Performance Level Summary by Group: Retesters Below School District State Below Below Percentages by Performance Level Percentage of Students Below and in Percentage of Students and in Retesters 4 44 3 4 44 3,98 5,36 5,33,0 6.4 66.3 5.6.7 6.4 66.3 5.6.7 4. 65. 9.4.3 School 66.3 5.6 7.3 District 66.3 5.6 7.3 State 65. 9.4 0.7 GENDER Female Male 5 4 5 4 4,953 5,958 7,599 456.6 65.4 30.8.3.6 65.4 30.8.3.7 66.6 9.5. 9 63 0 9 63 0 6,38 5,380 7,77 564 9.6 67.0.3. 9.6 67.0.3. 5.6 63.6 9.4.4 School 65.4 30.8 3. District 65.4 30.8 3. State 66.6 9.5 0.7 School 67.0.3 3.4 District 67.0.3 3.4 State 63.6 9.4 0.8 IEP-Special Education 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 4,977 8,45 988 4 4. 58.8 0.0 0.0 4. 58.8 0.0 0.0 34.5 58.4 6.8 0.3 School 4. 58.8 0.0 District 4. 58.8 0.0 State 34.5 58.4 7. PROGRAM STATUS Migrant Education Program Economically Disadvantaged English Language Learner 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 9 3 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.5 70.4. 0.0 8 48 8 48 8,4 5,94 5,038 55.6 69.6 5.9.9.6 69.6 5.9.9.0 65.3 3.0 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0,7,067 0 9 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 48.7 46. 4.8 0.4 State 70.4. School 69.6 8.8 District 69.6 8.8 State.0 65.3 3.7 School 00 0.0 District 00 0.0 State 48.7 46. 5. Historically Underperforming 0 5 0 5 9,77 9,653 5,73 90 3.3 69.3 4.7.7 3.3 69.3 4.7.7.4 65.3.6 0.6 School 69.3 7.3 District 69.3 7.3 State.4 65.3 3. 00 50 0 50 00 Winter 03/04 Page 0

Performance Level Summary by Group: Retesters (Continued) Below School District State Below Below Percentages by Performance Level Percentage of Students Below and in Percentage of Students and in American Indian/ Alaskan Native (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 6 7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.5 63.9 7.5.0 State 63.9 8.6 Asian (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 9 348 7 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 8. 56..4 4.4 School 00 0.0 District 00 0.0 State 56..4 5.8 Black or African American (not Hispanic) 6 3 0 6 3 0 4,458 0,97,573 74 0.0 60.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 30.0 0.0 7. 6.8 9.6 0.5 School 60.0 30.0 30.0 District 60.0 30.0 30.0 State 7. 6.8 0.0 RACE/ETHNICITY Hispanic (any race) Multi-Racial/Two or more races (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0 0 0,898 4,879 97 36 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 4.5 63.0.0 0.5 0 4 0 0 4 0 7 983 0 0.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 5. 68.7 5.4 0.7 School 00 0.0 District 00 0.0 State 4.5 63.0.4 School 0.0 80.0 80.0 District 0.0 80.0 80.0 State 68.7 6. White (not Hispanic) 0 05 37 3 0 05 37 3 4,300 34,8,30 86 6.5 67.7 3.9.9 6.5 67.7 3.9.9 8.3 66.3 3.7.6 School 67.7 3.9 5.8 District 67.7 3.9 5.8 State 66.3 3.7 5.3 Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 3 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7. 56. 4.4.4 State 56. 4.4 6.8 If a percentage is not displayed within the bar graph, consult the table for the actual percentage. Summaries are based on students' highest scores to date. Please note that the percentages in the table may not add up to 00 due to rounding. 00 50 0 50 00 Winter 03/04 Page

Performance Summary by Assessment Anchor Based on Current Test Administration Perfomance Summary by Assessment Anchor: All Testers Points Possible Minimum Estimated Points Needed to Pass School District State School Percent of District Percent of State Percent of Module - Operations and Linear Equations & Inequalities 30 7 4 4 3.0 3.0 8.4 A.. Operations with Real Numbers and Expressions 6 3.. 8. A.. Linear Equations 8 7 7 5 3.4 3.4 0.5 A..3 Linear Inequalities 6 5 5 4 3.0 3.0 8.8 Module - Linear Functions and Data Organizations 30 5 0.6.6 9.7 A.. Functions 6 4 4 4 7.6 7.6 0.3 A.. Coordinate Geometry 6 4 4 3 5.0 5.0. A..3 Data Analysis 6 4 3 3 3 4.4 4.4 7.6 Due to rounding, the minimum estimated points needed to pass at the assessment anchor level may not always sum to the corresponding points at the module level. : The median is the score where approximately half of the students score above and half score below. All medians in this report are calculated based on students' scores. The median is reported instead of the mean because extreme outlier scores can impact the mean for a small group (e.g., 5 or fewer students). Winter 03/04 Page

Performance Summary by Assessment Anchor Based on Current Test Administration Perfomance Summary by Assessment Anchor: First-Time Testers Points Possible Minimum Estimated Points Needed to Pass School District State School Percent of District Percent of State Percent of Module - Operations and Linear Equations & Inequalities 30 7 5 5 4 30.0 30.0 40.0 A.. Operations with Real Numbers and Expressions 6 3 4.0 4.0 3.7 A.. Linear Equations 8 8 8 7 3.0 3.0 39.6 A..3 Linear Inequalities 6 5 5 5 6.0 6.0 38.0 Module - Linear Functions and Data Organizations 30 5 3 3 3 4.0 4.0 4.6 A.. Functions 6 5 5 5.0.0 40.5 A.. Coordinate Geometry 6 4 4 4.0.0 3.6 A..3 Data Analysis 6 4 4 4 3 30.0 30.0 5.6 Due to rounding, the minimum estimated points needed to pass at the assessment anchor level may not always sum to the corresponding points at the module level. : The median is the score where approximately half of the students score above and half score below. All medians in this report are calculated based on students' scores. The median is reported instead of the mean because extreme outlier scores can impact the mean for a small group (e.g., 5 or fewer students). Winter 03/04 Page 3

Performance Summary by Assessment Anchor Based on Current Test Administration Perfomance Summary by Assessment Anchor: Retesters Points Possible Minimum Estimated Points Needed to Pass School District State School Percent of District Percent of State Percent of Module - Operations and Linear Equations & Inequalities 30 7 4 4 0.9 0.9.4 A.. Operations with Real Numbers and Expressions 6 3 0.3 0.3 4. A.. Linear Equations 8 6 6 5 0.9 0.9 5. A..3 Linear Inequalities 6 5 5 4.. 3.4 Module - Linear Functions and Data Organizations 30 5 0 9.3 9.3 3.7 A.. Functions 6 4 4 4 6.3 6.3 4.7 A.. Coordinate Geometry 6 4 4 3.9.9 6.9 A..3 Data Analysis 6 4 3 3 3 9.9 9.9 5.3 Due to rounding, the minimum estimated points needed to pass at the assessment anchor level may not always sum to the corresponding points at the module level. : The median is the score where approximately half of the students score above and half score below. All medians in this report are calculated based on students' scores. The median is reported instead of the mean because extreme outlier scores can impact the mean for a small group (e.g., 5 or fewer students). Winter 03/04 Page 4