ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Similar documents
ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Shelters Elementary School

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Financing Education In Minnesota

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

State of New Jersey

Data Diskette & CD ROM

El Toro Elementary School

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Best Colleges Main Survey

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Cuero Independent School District

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

African American Male Achievement Update

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

State Parental Involvement Plan

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

Grant/Scholarship General Criteria CRITERIA TO APPLY FOR AN AESF GRANT/SCHOLARSHIP

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Transportation Equity Analysis

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

PUBLIC SCHOOL OPEN ENROLLMENT POLICY FOR INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL DISTRICT

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Rural Education in Oregon

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Scholarship Reporting

Bellehaven Elementary

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Estimating the Cost of Meeting Student Performance Standards in the St. Louis Public Schools

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

University of Arizona

Charter School Performance Comparable to Other Public Schools; Stronger Accountability Needed

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

Raw Data Files Instructions

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Hokulani Elementary School

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

AYP: Adequate Yearly Progress

Parent Information Welcome to the San Diego State University Community Reading Clinic

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Iva Meairs Elementary School

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Master of Science in Taxation (M.S.T.) Program

Clark Lane Middle School

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Transcription:

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD Oblong CUSD Oblong, ILLINOIS 2 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. Starting in 29, charter school information is included in district statistics. STUDENTS RACIAL/ETHNIC BACKGROUND AND OTHER INFORMATION 98. 5..8 8.3.6 23..2. Native Hawaiian /Pacific. American Indian.3 Two or More Races.3 2.8 Percent Low- Income 39.3 8. Percent Limited- English- Proficient 8.8 Percent IEP 7.8. High Sch. Dropout Rate 3.2 2.7 Chronic Truancy Rate.5 3.2 Mobility Rate. 2.8 Attendance Rate 93.8 9. Total Enrollment 628 2,7,86 Low-income students come from families receiving public aid; live in institutions for neglected or delinquent children; are supported in foster homes with public funds; or are eligible to receive free or reduced-price lunches. IEP students are those students eligible to receive special education services. INSTRUCTIONAL SETTING Limited-English-proficient students are those students eligible for transitional bilingual programs. Mobility rate is based on the number of times students enroll in or leave a school during the school year. Chronic truants are students who are absent from school without valid cause for 8 or more of the last 8 school days. Total Enrollment is based on Home School. PARENTAL CONTACT* Percent STUDENT-TO-STAFF RATIOS Pupil- Teacher Elementary Pupil- Teacher Secondary Pupil- Certified Staff Pupil- Administrator 96. 6. 8.8 3.2 8.9.8 3.6 3. 2.3 * Parental contact includes parent-teacher conferences, parental visits to school, school visits to home, telephone conversations, and written correspondence. AVERAGE CLASS SIZE (as of the first school day in May) Grades K 5 6 7 8 9-2.3 2.9 9.5 2.6 22.5 9.5 23. 27. 25.5 2. 2.8 22.3 22.9 23.3 22. 2.3 9.5 2.3 9.8 9.2 TIME DEVOTED TO TEACHING CORE SUBJECTS (Minutes Per Day) English/Language Arts Grades 3 6 8 3 6 8 3 6 8 5 3 3 3 3 3 86 86 6 55 5 3 3 3 9 Social 3 6 8 3 3 3 3

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 2 TEACHER INFORMATION (Full-Time Equivalents) Native Hawaiian/ Pacific islander American Indian Two or More Races Unknown Total Number 22.9 77. 8 82. 6. 5..2...7.3 23. 76.9 28,262 TEACHER INFORMATION ( Continued ) : : All Schools High Poverty Schools Low Poverty Schools All Schools High Poverty Schools Low Poverty Schools Average Teaching Experience (Years) 7. 3.2 3. 2.9 SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCES % of Teachers with Bachelor's Degrees 5 39.5. 3.5 % of Teachers with Master's & Above 5 6. 58.5 68. % of Teachers with Emergency or Provisional Credentials.2.6..2 % of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers.8 3.3 The No Child Left Behind Act requires that information for certain data elements be disaggregated by high- and low-poverty schools. Poverty (low-income) is defined on page of all report cards. High- and low-poverty schools include those in the top and bottom quarters of the poverty distribution of schools in the state. Disaggregated data are reported only if at least one school in your district falls within the high-poverty quarter and at least one school within the low-poverty quarter. TEACHER/ADMINISTRATOR SALARIES (Full-Time Equivalents) $2, $6, Salaries and counts of staff are summed across a district based on the percentage of time that each individual is employed as a teacher or an administrator and may or may not reflect the actual paid salaries for the district. $2, $95,675 $9,759 $8, $, $3,832 $6,978 $ Average Teacher Salary Average Administrator Salary EXPENDITURE BY FUNCTION 29- (Percentages) 7 6 5 9.3 7.5 3 33. 3.5 2 6.9 3.2.3 7.7 Instruction General Administration Supporting Services Other Expenditures

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 3 REVENUE BY SOURCE 29- % % EXPENDITURE BY FUND 29- % % Local Property Taxes Other Local Funding General Aid Other Funding Federal Funding TOTAL $,7,37 $67,7 $2,6,893 $558,59 $99,87 $6,5,76 2...3 9. 6.3 58.9 6..9 7.5 2. Education Operations & Maintenance Transportation Debt Service Tort Municipal Retirement/ Social Security Fire Prevention & Safety Site & Construction/ Capital Improvement TOTAL $,539,535 $37,35 $68,66 $236,28 $26,989 $37, $2,959 $ $6,27,723 7. 5. 7.6 3.9. 5.. 72.9 6. 3.8 7.2.2.9.7 6. OTHER FINANCIAL INDICATORS 28 Equalized Assessed Valuation per Pupil 28 Total School Tax Rate per $ $56,32 5.3 ** ** 29- Instructional Expenditure per Pupil $5,293 $6,773 29- Operating Expenditure per Pupil $9,693 $,537 ** Due to the way Illinois school districts are configured, state averages for equalized assessed valuation per pupil and total school tax rate per $ are not provided. Equalized assessed valuation includes all computed property values upon which a district's local tax rate is calculated. Total school tax rate is a district's total tax rate as it appears on local property tax bills. Instructional expenditure per pupil includes the direct costs of teaching pupils or the interaction between teachers and pupils. Operating expenditure per pupil includes the gross operating cost of a school district excluding summer school, adult education, bond principal retired, and capital expenditures. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE ACT ASSESSMENT: GRADUATING CLASS OF 2* 36. 32. 28. 2. 2 9.3 2.6 9. 2.3 7.8 2.7 9.8 2.5 9.9 2.5 6. 2. 8.. Composite English The number and percent of students taking the ACT are no longer reported since virtually every eleventh grade student takes the ACT as part of the PSAE. * Includes graduating students' most recent ACT Assessment scores from an ACT national test date or PSAE testing. Excludes the scores of students who took the test with special accommodations. averages for ACT data are based on regular public schools and do not include private and special purpose schools. HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE Gender Race / Ethnicity All Native Hawaiian/ Pacific American Indian LEP Migrant Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged 8.6 7. 89.3 8.9 62.5 33.3 83.8 8.9 86.7 89. 7. 76.8 66.2 75. Two or More Races

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 29 NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS (NAEP) NAEP is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education and administered to students in grade, 8, and 2. Only grade and 8 results are required to be reported. Achievement levels reflect what students should know and be able to do. Based on recommendations from policymakers, educators, and members of the general public, the Governing Board for NAEP sets specific achievement levels for each subject area and grade. To provide a context for interpreting student performance, NAEP results are reported as percentages of students performing below the Basic level, at or above the Basic and Proficient levels, and at the Advanced level. Basic denotes partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at a given grade. Proficient represents solid academic performance. Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter. Advanced represents superior performance. The four achievement levels (below basic, basic, proficient, and advanced) are reported as level through level, respectively. Please note that only state results are reported. Grade Grade - All 35.3 32. 23.7 8.6 2..9 3.9 6.7 Grade - Racial/Ethnic Background 22. 3.2 3.8 2. 9.5 38.9 2. 9.5 59.8 28.8.. 5.8 3.3.3.6 52. 32. 3.5 2. 28. 5.7 8.8.5 9.2 27. 36.2 27. 3. 23.9 8. 25. American Indian Grade - Limited-English-Proficient 7.3 22.3 6.6.8 7.2 2.2 9.8.8 Grade - Students with Disabilities 67.2 8..6. 38.2 38.6 9.3 3.9 Grade - Economically Disadvantaged 53. 3.7 3..8 3.2 7.9 6.8. Grade - NAEP Participation Rates Limited English Proficient 79.5 85.3 Students with Disabilities 8.6 88.2

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 5 Grade 8 Grade 8 - All 23.5 3.8 3. 2.3 27. 39.5 25.9 7.2 Grade 8 - Racial/Ethnic Background 3.9 3.8 39...6.6 33.6.2 6..6.2 58.6 32.6 8..7 3.9 6.7 8..3.6 2. 5.9. 7.6 32.5 52. 7.8.8 29.6.6 9. American Indian Grade 8 - Limited-English-Proficient 72. 23.5.5 68.3 2.3 7..3 Grade 8 - Students with Disabilities 62.9 27.2 9.6.3 62.2 29.9 6.9. Grade 8 - Economically Disadvantaged..6 5.7.5 6.9 38.6 2.8.7 Grade 8 - NAEP Participation Rates Limited English Proficient 76. 8. Students with Disabilities 78. 8.3

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD OVERALL STUDENT PERFORMANCE 6 These charts present the overall percentages of state test scores categorized as meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards for your district and the state. They represent your district's performance in reading, mathematics, and science. OVERALL PERFORMANCE - ALL STATE TESTS 8 6 73.9 73.6 76. 76.5 29-2- 2 OVERALL ILLINOIS STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TEST (ISAT) PERFORMANCE 8 8. 8.3 8.9 82. 6 29-2- 2 OVERALL PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) PERFORMANCE 8 6 3.9 3.5 53. 5.5 29-2- 2

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 7 ISAT PERFORMANCE These charts provide information on attainment of the Illinois Learning Standards. They show the percents of student scores meeting or exceeding Standards for the grades and subjects tested on ISAT. ISAT Grade 3 8 68.8 76.9 73.7 7.7 79.2 89.7 86.3 87.3 6 29-2- 2 ISAT Grade 8 6 8.8 68. 73.7 7.7 9. 89. 86. 87.7 86.5 8. 76.7 79.3 29-2- 2 ISAT Grade 5 8 68.8 82.7 7.7 76. 7. 8. 83. 8. 6 29-2- 2

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 8 ISAT Grade 6 8 6 86.7 72.5 8.2 8. 82.2 6.7 8.6 8. 29-2- 2 ISAT Grade 7 8 8.6 89. 77.5 78.8 78.9 8.8 8. 8.3 8.2 8. 82. 8.9 6 2 29-2- ISAT Grade 8 8 85.7 82. 8. 85. 77. 87.2 83.7 86.3 6 29-2- 2

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 9 PSAE PERFORMANCE These charts provide information on attainment of the Illinois Learning Standards. They show the average scores and also the percents of student scores meeting or exceeding Standards in reading, mathematics, and science on PSAE. PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) - Average Scores 2 8 6 55 5 56 56 5 52 57 56 5 56 58 57 29-2- 2 PSAE scores range from 2 to 2. PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) - Percents Meeting or Exceeding Standards 8 6 56.8 6.9 5. 5. 29.5 36.7 52.7 5.3 5.5 6.9 52. 9.2 29-2- 2 Number of students in this with PSAE scores in 2: 9

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD PERFORMANCE ON STATE ASSESSMENTS Federal law requires that student achievement results for reading, mathematics, and science for schools providing Title I services be reported to the general public. The Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) is administered to students in grades 3 through 8. The Prairie Achievement Examination (PSAE) is administered to students in grade. The Illinois Alternate Assessment (IAA) is administered to students with disabilities whose Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) indicate that participation in the ISAT or PSAE would not be appropriate. Students with disabilities have an IEP (No Child Left Behind Act). An IEP is a written plan for a child with a disability who is eligible to receive special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. and are tested in grades 3 through 8, and. is tested in grades, 7, and. In order to protect students' identities, test data for groups of fewer than ten students are not reported. PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS NOT TESTED IN STATE TESTING PROGRAMS FOR READING Gender Racial/Ethnic Background All Native Hawaiian /Pacific American Indian Two or More Races LEP Migrant Economically Students with Disadvantaged Disabilities *Enrollment 328 68 6 325 67 35.3.6.3.5.7 *Enrollment,75,993.5 55,552.5 525,225. 55,77. 97,979.7 2,338.3,33.9 976.5 3,35. 29,668.5 65,98.7 276. 5,7.9 522,525.5 * Enrollment as reported during the testing windows for grades 3-8 and. Number of LEP Students who have attended schools in the U.S. for less than 2 months and are not assessed on the 's reading/language arts test: PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS NOT TESTED IN STATE TESTING PROGRAMS FOR MATHEMATICS Gender Racial/Ethnic Background All Native Hawaiian /Pacific American Indian Two or More Races LEP Economically Students with Disadvantaged Migrant Disabilities *Enrollment 328.3 68.6 6 325.3 67.5 35.7 *Enrollment,77,7. 55,9.5 526,. 555,55. 98,36.7 2,999.3,62.7 98. 3,32.5 29,68. 67,235. 282. 5,2.9 523,732.5 * Enrollment as reported during the testing windows for grades 3-8 and.

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS NOT TESTED IN STATE TESTING PROGRAMS FOR SCIENCE Gender Racial/Ethnic Background All Native Hawaiian /Pacific American Indian Two or More Races LEP Economically Students with Disadvantaged Migrant Disabilities *Enrollment 5. 78 2.6 67. 3 3.2 62 3.2 *Enrollment 6,53.8 23,56.9 225,88.7 2,336.6 8,536.3,76.7 9,8.5,39.7.8 2,8.7 23,78.7 23 63,69. 2,96.9 * Enrollment as reported during the testing windows for grades, 7, and. ILLINOIS STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TEST (ISAT) The following tables show the percentages of student scores in each of four performance levels. These levels were established with the help of Illinois educators who teach the grade levels and learning areas tested. Due to rounding, the sum of the percentages in the four performance levels may not always equal. Level -- Academic Warning - Level 2 -- Below Standards - Level 3 -- Meets Standards - Level -- Exceeds Standards - Student work demonstrates limited knowledge and skills in the subject. Because of major gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills ineffectively. Student work demonstrates basic knowledge and skills in the subject. However, because of gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills in limited ways. Student work demonstrates proficient knowledge and skills in the subject. Students effectively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems. Student work demonstrates advanced knowledge and skills in the subject. Students creatively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems and evaluate the results. Grade 3 Grade 3 - All 5. 5.8 7.9 5.3 9.5 7.6 25.6 27. 2.9.3 56. 9.8 3.2 33.3. Grade 3 - Gender 7. 28.6 57. 7. 7. 7. 2. 7. 2. 6.5 25. 3.3 9.9.2 5.6..2 2. 7.8 8. 8.8 36. 29.2 2. 2. 9.8 8. 5.2 2.6

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 2 Grade 3 - Racial/Ethnic Background 5.3 8. 5 26.3.5 55.3 3.2 2.6 2.3 8.7...9 37.2 56.8.8 28.6 7.3 3.2 7.3 8.8 5. 22.9 9.3 29.3 7.6 3.8 3.6.3 52.5 29.5 2.5 8. 2.5 6.6.. 2.3 7.5 Native Hawaiian/Pacific 2.7. 6.8 36...7 5.9 American Indian Two or More Races 7. 3.9 2.7 6.8 5.8 7.2 9. 32. 3.2.8 2. 8.7 5.8 2.2 38.5 7. Grade 3 - Economically Disadvantaged 2 Free/Reduced Price Lunch Not Eligible 2.5 9..8 25. 28.2 3. 9.9 3 5 8.3 52.2 6.8 2.5. 3.8..8.8 6.3 75. 5.3 5.7 3. 3.5 3.8 33.7 8.8 28.2 3.5 6.6 Grade Grade - All 3.9 29.8 38.3.6 53.6.2.9 2.3.5 3.2.2. 6. 27.6.3 3.5 5.2 7.2 65.2 58. 5.2 2. Grade - Gender 3.5 2.7 3.8 8.7 56.5 3.8.2 27.6. 27..5.6 58.3 28.6.5 3.8 8.2 6.9 59. 56.6 8.2 22.6 2.8 37.5.7 2.5 5 37.5.6 2..9 33.5.9.5 6.9 26.7.2 3. 2.5 7.5 7.8 6.2 2.5 9.2

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 3 Grade - Racial/Ethnic Background 3.9 29.8 38.3.6 53.6.2.3 5.2 65.2 5.2..7.3.5.6 5.8 56.6 37.. 8.5 6..2.9.5.3 3.3 2.7 2.9 65.. 8.3. 52.6 5.7.3 35.3 6. 6.9.6 6. 67. 5.3 5. 25.3 59.7 9.7.. 37.3 52..6 3.8.2 5.3 2. 7.8 53. 37.2 Native Hawaiian/Pacific 2.3 2.5 36.. 7. 55.9 33.9.7 3.3 53.9 28. American Indian Two or More Races. 32.7 3.7 22.. 3. 66. 9.2.9 9.6.5.3.9.5 57. 3.5 3.7.9 22.2.6 58.8 5.3 58.8 2.6 Grade - Students with Disabilities IEP.9 72.2 56. 27.8 29. 9.8 5.7 6.7 29. 72.2 55...3 Non-IEP 6.9 3. 62. 6.9. 5.7.3 9.6 6.8 33.3.5 8. 6.9 3.2.8 9.9 2.5 29. 3.2 58.8 5. 6.9 69. 5. 59.6 8.8 2. 22.8 Grade - Economically Disadvantaged Free/Reduced Price Lunch Not Eligible 5 26.9 23. 5. 65. 9.2. 28. 52. 6..5 36.3 6.5 5.7.9 7.2 66.5.3 5.9 26.6 58. 9.2 9.5 33.3 57..8 38. 57..8 8..3.3.8 2. 5.5..6 53.3.6. 7.3 58. 33.3 Grade 5 Grade 5 - All Grade 5 - Gender 7.3 53.8 28.8 8.9 62.3 8.9. 23.2 9. 27.3.5 5.5 6.6 9.. 5.9 37.. 63. 25.9.5 26. 8.8 2.6.6 6.5 63. 9.9.2 2. 2. 56. 9. 2 3.2. 26.9.5 6.5 66.3.5 8.8

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD Grade 5 - Racial/Ethnic Background 7.6 52.9 29. 9.2 6.5 9.2..7 9.8 36.3.2 8.9 6.9 25.9.8 38.5 8.3 2..3 29.5 62.5 6.6.6 3.7 9.5 5.3.6 2.8 68.7 9.8.2 9.8.2 8.7. 5. 8. 6.5 Native Hawaiian/Pacific American Indian Two or More Races 3.3 9.7.5.8 58.5 3.8.7.2 28.7 8. 7.9 9. 22.8 32.2.2.3 9.7 3. 62.9 63.9 7. 22.3 Grade 5 - Economically Disadvantaged 2 Free/Reduced Price Lunch Not Eligible.6. 3 35.3 9..9 3 5.2 62.5 8. 3 3.9 28...8.2 23.8 6.9 23.7 67. 5.6 62.5 7.2 62.2.3 8.5 2.9 3.5 Grade 6 Grade 6 - All 27.5 3. 29. 35.3 56.9 7.8.2 5.7 56.8 27.3.6 5.5 58. 25.9 Grade 6 - Gender 3 3.3 26.7 5.3 9. 57. 23.5.7 6.8 56.2 26.3 23.8 2.9 33.3 28.6 66.7.8. 2.2 56.5 3.3.5. 59.9 25.6

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 5 Grade 6 - Racial/Ethnic Background Native Hawaiian/Pacific American Indian Two or More Races 27.5 3. 29. 35.3 56.9 7.8. 9. 5.7 35.8.3 8.9 56.8 3.. 28. 6..3 3. 58.6.2 2.7 6.6 6..7 2.5 63.8 5.. 6..5 52..2.7 38. 56.6.7 55.7 33.6.8 9. 56.6 33.6. 8. 6. 2..8 8. 6.5 2.5. 2.9 55. 3.8. 3.3 57. 29. Grade 6 - Students with Disabilities IEP 7.6 29. 9. 5.9.3 5.5.8 5. 3. 6. 5. 5.9 Non-IEP 5.9 5. 5.9 82..8.3 59. 3.6.2.9 6 28.9 Grade 6 - Economically Disadvantaged Free/Reduced Price Lunch 5 33.3 6.7 62.5 37.5.3 2.5 6..9.9 2. 62. 3. Not Eligible 7. 5.9.7. 7..8. 7. 52..5.2 7. 5. 38.7 Grade 7 Grade 7 - All.9 65.2 23.9 5.2 58.7 26. 6.5 3. 58.7 2.7. 2.8 58. 2.8 2..5 53.9 3. 5.7 2. 57.8 2. Grade 7 - Gender 6. 6. 2 6. 6 2. 8. 6. 52. 2..6 2.9 56.8 7.7 2.8 5. 5.7 3.5 6.8 2. 5.5 26..8 66.7 28.6.3 57. 28.6.8 9.5 66.7 9..2 6.5 59.3 2..5 2. 56..3.6 2. 6.3 2.7

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 6 Grade 7 - Racial/Ethnic Background Native Hawaiian/Pacific American Indian Two or More Races 8.9 66.7 2. 3.3 6 26.7 6.7. 6 22.2.2. 58.3 27.. 8.5 5. 38.9 2.9 6.8 55.9 3.5.9 3.3 55.7 9..9 2. 58.3 2. 2.3 22.9 58. 6.5.5 26.6 6.9.9 2.6 7.7 59.8 9.9 7.5 7.9 63.3.3.2 8.2 8.9 2.6.8.8 33.6 6.9 2. 5.3 5.2 2. 3.6 57. 29..6 7. 5 2.3.2 7.7 59.5 28.6. 3. 55.5 3. 3.5 9.3 56. 2.7 8.3 6.3 59. 6.3.3 9.2 57.6 22.9 2. 3.3 52.6 32..8.3 55.9 28. Grade 7 - Economically Disadvantaged Free/Reduced Price Lunch Not Eligible 26.3 57.9 5.8 2. 63.2 5.8 5.8 2. 7. 5.8.7 3. 58.3 3.5 2.6 59. 6. 9.2 9.3 6.. 7. 29.6. 55.6 33.3 7. 66.7 25.9..2 57.7 3.9.9 6.9 8.7 3. 2. 5.9 5.7 36.9 Grade 8 Grade 8 - All 7.9 79.5 2.6 2.8 66.7 2.5.2.8 7.9.. 3.3 5.5 3.8 Grade 8 - Gender 2. 73.7 5.3.5 68. 2..3 7.9 73. 8.9.5 5. 53. 3.3. 5..6 85. 76.8.5.3 5..5 65. 56. 2 32.2

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 7 Grade 8 - Racial/Ethnic Background 7.9 79.5 2.6 2.8 66.7 2.5. 9.7 75.9.3.3 8. 5.9.5.3 25.6 7.7 2..8 25. 6.6 3.2.2 9.7 76...5 7. 6.8 2.8. 5.9 7.6 23...7 3.3 6.9 Native Hawaiian/Pacific.6 9.7 73.3 6..2 8.5 8.5.8 American Indian Two or More Races. 2.8.3 7. 73. 5.2 2.2..6 9..8 55.3 5.3 2.2 33.3 Grade 8 - Economically Disadvantaged 2 Free/Reduced Price Lunch Not Eligible.3. 33.3 22.7. 7.8 3 66.7 73.5 85.2 76. 3. 3.7 6..7.2 25. 66.7 2.6 6.3 7. 66.7 6.8 8. 8.3 7. 25.9.6 PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) The following tables show the percentages of student scores in each of four performance levels. These levels were established with the help of Illinois educators who teach the grade levels and learning areas tested. Due to rounding, the sum of the percentages in the four performance levels may not always equal. Level -- Academic Warning - Level 2 -- Below Standards - Level 3 -- Meets Standards - Level -- Exceeds Standards - Student work demonstrates limited knowledge and skills in the subject. Because of major gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills ineffectively. Student work demonstrates basic knowledge and skills in the subject. However, because of gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills in limited ways. Student work demonstrates proficient knowledge and skills in the subject. Students effectively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems. Student work demonstrates advanced knowledge and skills in the subject. Students creatively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems and evaluate the results. Grade Grade - All 6.. 6.9 38.9 2.9.7...2 53. 38.7 3.7 3. 2. 8.2 2.2 8.6.8 2.2 6.9 39.6 9.6

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 8 Grade - Gender 7. 2.7 37. 8. 39.3 38.2 7. 9.8 3.7.6 5.9.7 35.9 3.3 3.7.2 3.7 9. 37. 59.3 38.6. 2.3.5 7.5 59. 38.5 36. 3.2.9 8.2 9. 5.5.5 27.3 2.9 6.2 22.7 8. 5.5 5.8 3.8 39.2 6.9 Grade - Racial/Ethnic Background Native Hawaiian/Pacific American Indian Two or More Races 6. 6.9 2.9..2 53. 3.7 2. 2.2.8 6.9 6. 29.6 9..9 5.3 29.8 53.5...3 5.. 8.5 56.7 23.2.6 23. 56.8 9.6.6 9.9 63.2 6.2.7.7 52. 3. 3.2 5.9 33..9.9 58. 27.7 2.2 6.7 27.3 6.3 9.7 3.2 9. 52. 25.7 3.9 25.7 9.3 2.2 2.5 2. 36.7 8..9 2.5.3 5.3 8.6 8. 38. 5.3 7.6 35.9 3.6 2.9 8. 3.8.6 6.6 5.8. 6.7 7.3 2.9 9.6 38.7 8.8 8.5 38.6. 8.7 6.5.2.8.5 Grade - Economically Disadvantaged Free/Reduced Price Lunch.3 2 5 3 35.7 2. 2 7. 3 7. 2. 2 6.3 3.3 Not Eligible 7. 53. 27.3 2.6 7.8 53. 27.3.5 5.6 59. 23.6.8 2.9 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 2.9 8.6 3. 6 5.5 29.7 9. 5. 5. 29. 53. 2.5. 3.3 5.6

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 9 2 ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) INFORMATION Is this district making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? No Has this district been identified for Improvement according to the AYP specifications of the federal No Child Left Behind Act? No Is this district making AYP in? No 2-2 Federal Improvement Status Is this district making AYP in? No 2-2 Improvement Status Percent Tested on Tests Percent Meeting/Exceeding Standards * Other Indicators Attendance Rate Graduation Rate % Met AYP % Met AYP % Safe Harbor Target ** Met AYP % Safe Harbor Target ** Met AYP % Met AYP % Met AYP AYP Minimum Target 95. 95. 85. 85. 9. 82. All 99.7 Yes 99.7 Yes 7.9 No 76.6 No 93.8 Yes 8.6 No 99.7 Yes 99.7 Yes 75. 77. No 76.7 75.7 No 9.2 8.9 Native Hawaiian/ Pacific American Indian Two or More Races LEP Students with Disabilities 98.5 Yes 98.5 Yes 28.3 35. No 7.5 3.9 No 92. 62.5 Economically Disadvantaged 99.3 Yes 99.3 Yes 59.8 6.8 No 68.6 65.8 No 92.7 33.3 Four Conditions Are Required For Making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP):. At least 95% tested in reading and mathematics for every student group. If the current year participation rate is less than 95%, this condition may be met if the average of the current and preceding year rates is at least 95%, or if the average of the current and two preceding years is at least 95%. Only actual participation rates are printed. If the participation rate printed is less than 95% and yet this school makes AYP, it means that the 95% condition was met by averaging. 2. At least 85% meeting/exceeding standards in reading and mathematics for every group. For any group with less than 85% meeting/exceeding standards, a 95% confidence interval was applied. Subgroups may meet this condition through Safe Harbor provisions.*** 3. At least 9% attendance rate for non-high schools and at least 82% graduation rate for high schools. * Includes only students enrolled as of 5//2. ** Safe Harbor Targets of 85% or above are not printed. ***Subgroups with fewer than 5 students are not reported. Safe Harbor only applies to subgroups of 5 or more. In order for Safe Harbor to apply, a subgroup must decrease by % the percentage of scores that did not meet standards from the previous year plus meet the other indicators (attendance rate for non-high schools and graduation rate for high schools) for the subgroup. For subgroups that do not meet their Safe Harbor Targets, a 75% confidence interval is applied. Safe Harbor allows schools an alternate method to meet subgroup minimum targets on achievement.

2-7--26- Oblong CUSD 2 FEDERAL SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT STATUS Below is a list of the Title I funded schools in the district that are in Federal School Improvement Status as defined by the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2. Number of schools in this district: 2 Number of Title I schools: Number of Title I schools in Federal School Improvement Status: Percent of schools in Federal School Improvement Status: 5% Years in School School ID School Name Improvement 272622 Oblong Elem School 5