ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Similar documents
ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Shelters Elementary School

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Financing Education In Minnesota

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Cooper Upper Elementary School

AYP: Adequate Yearly Progress

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

African American Male Achievement Update

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

State of New Jersey

Transportation Equity Analysis

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Cuero Independent School District

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

State Parental Involvement Plan

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

El Toro Elementary School

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Best Colleges Main Survey

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Rural Education in Oregon

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

HIGH SCHOOL PREP PROGRAM APPLICATION For students currently in 7th grade

Grant/Scholarship General Criteria CRITERIA TO APPLY FOR AN AESF GRANT/SCHOLARSHIP

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Scholarship Reporting

Trends & Issues Report

46 Children s Defense Fund

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

PUBLIC SCHOOL OPEN ENROLLMENT POLICY FOR INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL DISTRICT

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Pupil Premium Grants. Information for Parents. April 2016

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

Estimating the Cost of Meeting Student Performance Standards in the St. Louis Public Schools

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Table of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Hokulani Elementary School

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Educational Attainment

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Kahului Elementary School

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

EMPLOYEE CALENDAR NOTES

University of Arizona

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Clark Lane Middle School

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Foundations of Bilingual Education. By Carlos J. Ovando and Mary Carol Combs

Transcription:

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 OLYMPIA CUSD 6 STANFORD, ILLINOIS and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. 2 7 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD STUDENTS RACIAL/ETHNIC BACKGROUND AND OTHER INFORMATION 97. 5.9.8 9.6.5 9.3 Asian/ Pacific Islander.6 3.8 Native American.2 Multi racial /Ethnic 2.2 Low- Income Rate 23.6.9 Limited- English- Proficient Rate 7.2 High Sch. Dropout Rate 2. 3.5 Chronic Truancy Rate.9 2.5 Mobility Rate 7.9 5.2 Attendance Rate 95. 93.7 Total Enrollment 2,3 2,77,856 Low-income students come from families receiving public aid; live in institutions for neglected or delinquent children; are supported in foster homes with public funds; or are eligible to receive free or reduced-price lunches. Limited-English-proficient students are those students eligible for transitional bilingual programs. Mobility rate is based on the number of times students enroll in or leave a school during the school year. Chronic truants are students who are absent from school without valid cause for 8 or more of the last 8 school days. INSTRUCTIONAL SETTING PARENTAL CONTACT* Percent STUDENT-TO-STAFF RATIOS Pupil- Teacher Elementary Pupil- Teacher Secondary Pupil- Certified Staff Pupil- Administrator 99. 96. 2. 8.8 8.8 8.8. 3.9 87. 23.6 * Parental contact includes parent-teacher conferences, parental visits to school, school visits to home, telephone conversations, and written correspondence. AVERAGE CLASS SIZE (as of the first school day in May) Grades K 5 6 7 8 9-2 2.3 2.9 2. 2. 25.3 22. 2.5 22.7 25.5 23. 2.3 2.8 22.5 22.8 22.6 2.8 2.3 2.9 2.6 8.9 TIME DEVOTED TO TEACHING CORE SUBJECTS (Minutes Per Day) English/Language Arts Grades 3 6 8 3 6 8 3 6 8 68 63 8 3 5 8 8 27 9 58 53 5 3 3 5 93 Social 3 6 8 27 38 8 3 3 TEACHER INFORMATION (Full-Time Equivalents) Asian/ Pacific Islander Native American Male Female Total Number 98..6 2.7 78.3 25 85. 8.8.6.2.2 23. 77. 27,

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 2 TEACHER INFORMATION ( Continued ) : All Schools High Poverty Schools Low Poverty Schools : All Schools High Poverty Schools Average Teaching Experience (Years) 5. 2.9 2.5 % of Teachers with Bachelor's Degrees 69.2 7.6 5.3 % of Teachers with Master's & Above 3.8 52.3 9.6 % of Teachers with Emergency or Provisional Credentials..5 2.6 % of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers 3.2 3. The No Child Left Behind Act requires that information for certain data elements be disaggregated by high- and low-poverty schools. Poverty (low-income) is defined on page of all report cards. High- and low-poverty schools include those in the top and bottom quarters of the poverty distribution of schools in the state. Disaggregated data are reported only if at least one school in your district falls within the high-poverty quarter and at least one school within the low-poverty quarter. Low Poverty Schools 2.3. 59.9.9.2 SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCES TEACHER/ADMINISTRATOR SALARIES (Full-Time Equivalents) $2, $6, Salaries and counts of staff are summed across a district based on the percentage of time that each individual is employed as a teacher or an administrator and may or may not reflect the actual paid salaries for the district. $2, $8, $, $5,79 $58,275 $87,87 $2,3 $ Average Teacher Salary Average Administrator Salary EXPENDITURE BY FUNCTION 25-6 (Percentages) 7 6 5 6.7 7.8 3 35. 32.7 2 5.7 7. 2.6 2.6 Instruction General Administration Supporting Services Other Expenditures

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 3 REVENUE BY SOURCE 25-6 % % EXPENDITURE BY FUND 25-6 % % Local Property Taxes Other Local Funding General Aid Other Funding Federal Funding TOTAL $,297,755 $,637,537 $,2,695 $,6,89 $,389,78 $8,96,5 5. 8.6 2.2 8. 7.3 58.8 6. 8.2 9.3 7.7 Education Operations & Maintenance Transportation Bond and Interest Rent Municipal Retirement/ Social Security Fire Prevention & Safety Site & Construction/ Capital Improvement TOTAL $2,855,28 $,672,538 $,37,55 $,979,36 $ $56,76 $39,38 $ $8,35,6 7. 9. 7.3.8 2.5.2 73. 8.6 3.9 6.2.8. 5. OTHER FINANCIAL INDICATORS 2 Equalized Assessed Valuation per Pupil 2 Total School Tax Rate per $ $2,36.9 ** ** 25-6 Instructional Expenditure per Pupil $,638 $5,567 25-6 Operating Expenditure per Pupil $8, $9,88 ** Due to the way Illinois school districts are configured, state averages for equalized assessed valuation per pupil and total school tax rate per $ are not provided. Equalized assessed valuation includes all computed property values upon which a district's local tax rate is calculated. Total school tax rate is a district's total tax rate as it appears on local property tax bills. Instructional expenditure per pupil includes the direct costs of teaching pupils or the interaction between teachers and pupils. Operating expenditure per pupil includes the gross operating cost of a school district excluding summer school, adult education, bond principal retired, and capital expenditures. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE ACT ASSESSMENT: GRADUATING CLASS OF 27* 36. 32. 28. 2. 2.6 2.3 2.5 2.5 2 2.3 2.5 2.2 2. 2.2 2 6. 2. 8.. Composite English The number and percent of students taking the ACT are no longer reported since virtually every eleventh grade student takes the ACT as part of the PSAE. * Includes graduating students' most recent ACT Assessment scores from an ACT national test date or PSAE testing. Excludes the scores of students who took the test with special accommodations. averages for ACT data are based on regular public schools and do not include private and special purpose schools. HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE Gender All Male Female Race / Ethnicity Asian/ Pacific Islander Native American Multi racial /Ethnic LEP Migrant Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged 9.3 86. 9.5 9 57. 6.3 85.9 83. 88.7 92.2 73. 93.5 7.9 7.9

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 OVERALL STUDENT PERFORMANCE These charts present the overall percentages of state test scores categorized as meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards for your district and the state. They represent your district's performance in reading, mathematics and science. OVERALL PERFORMANCE - ALL STATE TESTS 8 8. 83.5 72.9 73.8 6 25-6 26-7 2 OVERALL ILLINOIS STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TEST (ISAT) PERFORMANCE 8 87.8 89.2 77. 78.7 6 25-6 26-7 2 OVERALL PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) PERFORMANCE 8 6 66. 56.6 5.3 52.6 25-6 26-7 2

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 5 OVERALL ILLINOIS ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT (IAA) PERFORMANCE 93. 8 77.3 6 62.6 59. 25-6 26-7 2 IAA scores in the Progressing and Attaining performance levels count the same, respectively, as scores on other state assessments that meet or exceed Standards.

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 6 ISAT PERFORMANCE These charts provide information on attainment of the Illinois Learning Standards. They show the percents of student scores meeting or exceeding Standards for the grades and subjects tested on ISAT. ISAT Grade 3 8 76.8 9.7 7.7 73. 9.5 96.9 85.6 86.8 6 25-6 26-7 2 ISAT Grade 8 82.8 8. 72.9 73.7 96. 88.6 8.8 86. 97. 89.9 79.8 79.8 6 25-6 26-7 2 ISAT Grade 5 8 83.9 86.5 68.5 69.7 9. 9.7 78.6 82.5 6 25-6 26-7 2

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 7 ISAT Grade 6 8 6 86. 86. 72.8 73. 9.9 9. 79. 8. 25-6 26-7 2 ISAT Grade 7 8 77. 86.8 72. 73. 86. 9.8 76. 79. 95. 9.8 8.9 79.3 6 2 25-6 26-7 ISAT Grade 8 8 83.2 8.6 79.2 8.8 88. 88. 78.2 8.3 6 25-6 26-7 2

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 8 PSAE PERFORMANCE These charts provide information on attainment of the Illinois Learning Standards. They show the average scores and also the percents of student scores meeting or exceeding Standards in reading, mathematics and science on PSAE. PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) - Average Scores 2 8 6 6 56 58 57 6 58 57 57 6 58 58 58 25-6 26-7 2 PSAE scores range from 2 to 2. PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) - Percents Meeting or Exceeding Standards 8 6 66.2 56.3 58. 5. 69.7 57.9 53.6 52.7 63. 55.6 5.8 5. 25-6 26-7 2 Number of students in this with PSAE scores in 27: 5 PERFORMANCE ON STATE ASSESSMENTS Federal law requires that student achievement results for reading, mathematics and science for schools providing Title I services be reported to the general public. The Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) is administered to students in grades 3 through 8. The Prairie Achievement Examination (PSAE) is administered to students in grade. The Illinois Measure of Annual Growth in English (IMAGE) is administered to limited-english-proficient students. The Illinois Alternate Assessment (IAA) is administered to students with disabilities whose Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) indicate that participation in the ISAT or PSAE would not be appropriate. Students with disabilities have an IEP (No Child Left Behind Act). An IEP is a written plan for a child with a disability who is eligible to receive special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 9 PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS NOT TESTED IN STATE TESTING PROGRAMS All Gender Male Female Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/ Pacific Islander Native American Multi racial /Ethnic LEP Migrant Economically Students with Disadvantaged Disabilities *Enrollment, 532 82 987 7 3 7 72 273 *Enrollment,8,882.2.2 553,532.. 53,38.. 595,977 2, 26,359,73..2...2..2...2,757 23,96 8,25.2.2 58.2.2 58,57.5.5 55,9.. * Enrollment as reported during the testing windows. ILLINOIS STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TEST (ISAT) The following tables show the percentages of student scores in each of four performance levels. These levels were established with the help of Illinois educators who teach the grade levels and learning areas tested. Due to rounding, the sum of the percentages in the four performance levels may not always equal. Level -- Academic Warning - Level 2 -- Below Standards - Level 3 -- Meets Standards - Level -- Exceeds Standards - Student work demonstrates limited knowledge and skills in the subject. Because of major gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills ineffectively. Student work demonstrates basic knowledge and skills in the subject. However, because of gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills in limited ways. Student work demonstrates proficient knowledge and skills in the subject. Students effectively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems. Student work demonstrates advanced knowledge and skills in the subject. Students creatively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems and evaluate the results. Grade 3 Grade 3 - All.6 5.3 7.8 59.7 2.7 8.8 3. 2..8 3.7 2.3 28.7 9.5.7 68.2 2. Grade 3 - Gender Male Female 2.9.8 57. 27.9.5. 25. 69. 7. 2.3 7.5 2.2.3 9. 3.. 3.6 3.3 9. 62.3 5.2 3. 27.2 3. 9.7 32.8 6. 67.2.9

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 Grade 3 - Racial/Ethnic Background.6 7.9 59.5 3..8 2. 27.8 69. 2.7.9 5.5 3.9.2.9.6 52.3 2.3 37.2 2. 8..8 2. 9.7 8. 6. 28.2 52..5 3.5.7 53.8 3. Asian/Pacific Islander. 9.2 8...5 2. 27.8 69.2 Native American.7 6. 56.9 22..7 7.8 5.2.3 Multiracial/Ethnic.9 22.3 5 22.8 2.8 9.9 7.9 39.5 Grade 3 - Students with Disabilities IEP.3 3. 65.2 9.9 37.2.7 Non-IEP.9 2.8 58.5 3. 9.2 5.5.2 37.7 26..3.2 2.5 3. 39. 8.8 7. 26. 8.. 3.5 23. 73.6 5. Grade 3 - Economically Disadvantaged 2 Free/Reduced Price Lunch Not Eligible 9.8 2. 2.2. 33. 6. 3.5 3 68.6 6. 56. 5.6 2.8 35. 33.8 7.2.. 2.9 5.7 6.5 5.6 2. 22.3.5 39.8 5. 2.6 7.5 5.6 Grade Grade - All. 7. 56. 25.. 52. 36.. 25.2 8.3 25..2 2.5 56.9 29.5. 3.5 8.6 6.7 66.9 6.5 23. 8.2 Grade - Gender Male 3. 22. 55.2 9..9 53.7 3.3.5 27.9 7.2 23.5.5 3. 55..3 3.. 9. 6.5 6.2 59. 26.9 2.5 Female 2.3 57.5 3. 8.2 5.7..6 22.5 9.5 27..8.9 58.7 28.7 3. 8.3 7. 72.2 6.2 9. 5.8

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 Grade - Racial/Ethnic Background.5 5.8 56. 26.3.3 5.9 36.8.5 8.3 65.9 2.2.5 7. 9. 33.2.5 6.8 55. 37.6. 8.6 6. 25.8 2.7 7..9 8.3 3. 28.7 58.2 9.8.8 37. 8.5 3.2. 3.5 53.7.8.9 3.5 66. 9. 3.3 2.9 67.8 7. Asian/Pacific Islander.2 9.2 8.6 2....6 56..6 6. 6.5 28.8 Native American.7 27. 7.6 23.6.9. 57.6 27. 3..9 65.8 6.2 Multiracial/Ethnic. 25.7 9. 23.9.2 2.9 59.8 26. 3.2 6.3 65. 5. Grade - Students with Disabilities IEP 8.3 5. 5 53.8 29.2 3.8 2.5 9.3 5. 33.3 3. 58.3 52.5 8.3 2. Non-IEP.3 62. 27.6 6.9 5.9 2.2. 2. 5.2 28.. 9.5 57.7 32.5.3 9..9 2.5 3. 28.9 65.2 53.2 7.8 67.2.7 63. 7. 8.5 2. 9.9 Grade - Economically Disadvantaged Free/Reduced Price Lunch Not Eligible 2.2 23.9 5.3 9.6 5.2 6.9 23.9 2..3 66.7 7.8 2. 6.6. 2.2 2. 62..3 7. 28.8 57.9 6.3. 3.8 57. 27.7 9.6 7.9 2.6. 6. 67. 25.5. 5. 9.6 35.. 6.3 53.3. 8. 6. 26.5 Grade 5 Grade 5 - All Grade 5 - Gender Male Female 3.5 5.9 3.6 8.3 66.2 25.6.8 29.6. 25.6.5 7. 62.8 9.7 2 9.3 3.7 8. 65.3 26.7. 33. 2.8 23.2.7 8. 6.7 2.7.5 5.2 26. 62. 5.5 32.8 28.. 8.6 5.9 67.2 6.9 2. 8.8

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 2 Grade 5 - Racial/Ethnic Background 3.8 53.8 32.3 7.7 66.2 26.2. 2.5 5.3 33.8.2 9.7 6.3 25.8 2. 53.6.6 8.2.6 38.2 55. 5..7 35. 9.6.7.3 8. 7.5. Asian/Pacific Islander. 2.2.8 2.8. 3.7 9.7 6.5 Native American 29.6 3.5 26.9. 8.8 67.3 3.5 Multiracial/Ethnic.8 28.9 5.7 2.7. 6.6 6.7 8.3 Grade 5 - Students with Disabilities IEP 57. 33.3 9.5 33.3 6.9.8.2 62.2 26. 7.6 2.6.5 5 5.9 Non-IEP 5. 58.9 35.7 3.6 67. 29.5.2 2. 7. 28.6.2 2.9 6.9 22. Grade 5 - Economically Disadvantaged 2 Free/Reduced Price Lunch Not Eligible..3 2.3 5.5 9. 8.2 3 56.8 2. 5.2 5.6 8.9. 36.5 36...2 6.2 62.2 28. 62.7 5.2 67.7 8.8 62.8 2.6 7.8 27. 28.2 Grade 6 Grade 6 - All 3.9 66.2 9.9.3.6 68.2 25.8.2 26. 5.3 9..5 8. 62.2 9.2 Grade 6 - Gender Male Female 9. 67.9 3. 2..8 66.7 26.2.3 29.9 53.7 6.2.7 9.5 6. 9.7 7.5 6.2 28..5 7. 25.. 22.8 5.9 22.2.3 6.5 6. 8.7

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 3 Grade 6 - Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/Pacific Islander Native American Multiracial/Ethnic 3. 66. 2.5..8 68.5 25.3. 6.5 57. 26.2.3. 6.2 25.5. 6.2 6.8 6.5. 37.9 5.9 5.9.3 37.6 53.8 8.. 22. 67..3. 9.3 53.7 36.9. 3.9 8.2 7.8 22.9 62.2.9. 6. 67.9.9.2 23.7 56.9 9.2. 6.8 65.2 7.6 Grade 6 - Students with Disabilities IEP 56.5 3.5 8.7 26. 56.5 8.7.2 6.6 3.6 3.6 2.7 8.2 5.. Non-IEP 6.3 7.3 23..8 7.3 28.9 2.3 58. 2.6..2 65. 2.7 Grade 6 - Economically Disadvantaged Free/Reduced Price Lunch 2. 6..6 2.2 68.3 9.5..7 5.5 7..9 29.5 6.6 8. Not Eligible 68.2 2.8.8.8 68.2 28.2. 5. 57. 27.9.2 9. 62.6 27.7 Grade 7 Grade 7 - All 3.2 67.9 8.9.6 7.5 6. 3.8. 3.8 56. 35.8.5 26. 58.3 5. 2.3 8.3 5.2 25.2 7. 3.7 55.2 2. Grade 7 - Gender Male Female 8.9 63.5 7.6. 8. 5. 39.2. 5. 8.6.9.7 29.9 56.3 3. 2.8 8.8 52. 26.3 7.7 3.3 52.5 26.5 8.2 7.8 2 7. 69. 23.5.7 2. 62. 3.6.3 22.2 6.5 7..7 7.8 56.5 2. 6.2.3 58. 2.

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 Grade 7 - Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/Pacific Islander Native American Multiracial/Ethnic 3.5 67.3 9.2.6 7.7 6.9 3.8.5 3.8 55.8 35.9.3 7. 6.5 2.8..8 53.8 3.3 3. 7.3 5.7 35..2.2 5.6 5.5 36.3 5.2 7. 6.3 26.8 5.9 5..5 35. 57.7 6.7 2.3 22.8 6.8 3. 9.5 2.3 6.2 9.. 9.3 6. 29.3.5.3 39. 56..5.5 5.9 3.. 2. 69. 9.3 3.3 9. 57.3 2.3 5.7 9. 6.8 2.5.5 23. 6. 5..9 7.8 57. 23.2 5.9.6 6 22.5 Grade 7 - Students with Disabilities IEP Non-IEP 56.7 36.7 6.7 3.3 36.7 5 2 6.7 53.3 2.9 65. 29.6 2..3 6.8 37..8 25.3 26.5.8 6. 3. 75.2 2.7.8 63.6 35.7.8.8 56.6.9. 9.6 63. 7.2.8 3.6 57. 28.6..6 57. 27. Grade 7 - Economically Disadvantaged Free/Reduced Price Lunch Not Eligible Grade 8 7.9 7. 7.7 5. 6. 2.5 7.7 5. 6. 23..9. 53. 5.6 3.9 29.6 56.2.3 2.5 22.6 56. 8.5.7 65.8 22.5.8 5. 6 3..3 3.3 53.3.2 5.9 62. 2.9.. 52.7 36. 3. 7.3 5. 35. Grade 8 - All 5. 76.2 8..9 58. 3..6 7.7 69.9.8.2 7.5 52.3 29. Grade 8 - Gender Male Female 5. 82.2 2.7 5. 63. 2.9.8 2.6 67.8 9.8.5 8.8 5. 29.6.3 5.7 3.6 7 72.2.3..9 8.6 6.2 52.9 5.5 38.6 28.

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 5 Grade 8 - Racial/Ethnic Background 5. 76. 8.6 2. 57. 3.7.3 2.6 7. 6..6. 5.8 38.2.3 28.9 66. 3.7 3. 35. 52.3 9.2.6 23.2 7.8 5.. 22.2 6. 6. Asian/Pacific Islander.2 6.2 7.3 23..2.3 35.5 6 Native American 7.7 73.2 9..5 2 5.3 27.2 Multiracial/Ethnic.5 6.5 7.6 2..2 6.3 5.8 27.7 Grade 8 - Students with Disabilities IEP 75. 25. 62.5 3.3 6.3 3. 55.9 39..3 6.3 5.7 37.2.8 Non-IEP 7.9 82.7 9. 5.5 6. 33...3 75. 3.6.3.8 5.8 33. Grade 8 - Economically Disadvantaged 2 Free/Reduced Price Lunch Not Eligible..3 27.5 27.2.7.3 3 72.5 67. 77.7 7.6..7 6.9 2..6 22.5 67.5 28.9 56. 7.8 5. 9.9 9.7 3. 37.9 39.8 PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) The following tables show the percentages of student scores in each of four performance levels. These levels were established with the help of Illinois educators who teach the grade levels and learning areas tested. Due to rounding, the sum of the percentages in the four performance levels may not always equal. Level -- Academic Warning - Level 2 -- Below Standards - Level 3 -- Meets Standards - Level -- Exceeds Standards - Student work demonstrates limited knowledge and skills in the subject. Because of major gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills ineffectively. Student work demonstrates basic knowledge and skills in the subject. However, because of gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills in limited ways. Student work demonstrates proficient knowledge and skills in the subject. Students effectively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems. Student work demonstrates advanced knowledge and skills in the subject. Students creatively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems and evaluate the results.

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 6 Grade Grade - All 8.3 8. 35. 37.5 5.7 3. 5.6.9 5.5 9.8 36.6 37.5 5.5 2.8 3. 9.9 6.9 8.7 37.5.3 5.3 5.6.7 Grade - Gender Male 9.9.8 38.3 8. 38..5 3.7.6.9 9. 2. 5.6 35. 3. 2.5 2..9 9.2 2.. 36.9. 8.6 3.7 Female 6.3 6. 3.7 37. 5. 5.7 7.9.2 6.3. 29.7 59. 2..7 7.8 9.5 8. 3.7 3.6 57..5.6 7.8 Grade - Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/Pacific Islander Native American Multiracial/Ethnic 8.5 3.8 5. 5.7 5.6 35.9 5.9 3.5 7. 37.6 9.6 5.7 5.7 3.8 9.2. 5.7 3.2 5. 2.7 5. 33. 7.8. 6.2 55.8 26.3.6 2.9 55.8 8.6.8 2.9 6.2 7.9..3 52.8 3. 2.6. 52.6 3. 2.. 57.7 26.2 2.. 28.3 5.2 7.5 2.8 2.6 9.2 26.5 3. 26. 9.7 2.8 9.8 3.6 6.6 9. 8. 36.3 9. 6. 8.2.3 2.9 8.6 8. 39.2 2.8 9.9..6.5 6.6 9.2 2.6 39.2 9. Grade - Students with Disabilities IEP 7.6 38..3 36.7. 6.6 2.8 3.8 39.7 63.6.5 5.9 3.2.3 38.. 7.6.3 5.6 2.2.8 Non-IEP.6.8 35. 36.7 56.9 6.5 6.5 2..8 6. 3.7 36.5 63. 6.5...6.6 35.8 39.7 56. 3.9 6.5.8 Grade - Economically Disadvantaged Free/Reduced Price Lunch.7 2 6.7 3 25. 3.6 6.9 2 62. 3 27.6 3. 7. 2 39.3 3 53.6 Not Eligible 5.8 52.9 28.7 2.6 9.9 52.9 25.6.6 8.2 57. 22.8 2. 7.8 29.3 56.9 6. 5..2 6.. 6.9 37. 9. 6.9 5.7 3.8 8.5. 6. 3.8 9. 3. 5. 3. 6.8 3.9

7-6-6-26- OLYMPIA CUSD 6 7 27 ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) INFORMATION Is this district making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? Has this district been identified for Improvement according to the AYP specifications of the federal No Child Left Behind Act? No Is this district making AYP in? 27-8 Federal Improvement Status Is this district making AYP in? 27-8 Improvement Status Percent Tested on Tests Percent Meeting/Exceeding Standards * Other Indicators Attendance Rate Graduation Rate % Met AYP % Met AYP % Safe Harbor Target ** Met AYP % Safe Harbor Target ** Met AYP % Met AYP % Met AYP AYP Minimum Target 95. 95. 55. 55. 9 72. All 8.6 87. 95. 9.3 8.9 87. Asian/Pacific Islander Native American Multiracial /Ethnic LEP Students with Disabilities 3.8 5. 58.2 95. 57. Economically Disadvantaged 72.9 79.8 Four Conditions Are Required For Making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP):. At least 95% tested in reading and mathematics for every student group. If the current year participation rate is less than 95%, this condition may be met if the average of the current and preceding year rates is at least 95%, or if the average of the current and two preceding years is at least 95%. Only actual participation rates are printed. If the participation rate printed is less than 95% and yet this school makes AYP, it means that the 95% condition was met by averaging. 2. At least 55.% meeting/exceeding standards in reading and mathematics for every group. For any group with less than 55.% meeting/exceeding standards, a 95% confidence interval was applied. Subgroups may meet this condition through Safe Harbor provisions.*** 3. For schools not making AYP solely because the IEP group fails to have 55.% meeting/exceeding standards, % may be added to this variable in accordance with the federal 2% flexibility provision.. At least 9% attendance rate for non-high schools and at least 72% graduation rate for high schools. * Includes only students enrolled as of 5//26. ** Safe Harbor Targets of 55.% or above are not printed. ***Subgroups with fewer than 5 students are not reported. Safe Harbor only applies to subgroups of 5 or more. In order for Safe Harbor to apply, a subgroup must decrease by % the percentage of scores that did not meet standards from the previous year plus meet the other indicators (attendance rate for non-high schools and graduation rate for high schools) for the subgroup. For subgroups that do not meet their Safe Harbor Targets, a 75% confidence interval is applied. Safe Harbor allows schools an alternate method to meet subgroup minimum targets on achievement.