Phone Address Greenspring Avenue. Baltimore, MD Principal. Rachel Brunson. Teachers. Total No.

Similar documents
School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Shelters Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Cooper Upper Elementary School

DIRECT CERTIFICATION AND THE COMMUNITY ELIGIBILITY PROVISION (CEP) HOW DO THEY WORK?

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

State of New Jersey

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Rural Education in Oregon

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

Kahului Elementary School

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Hokulani Elementary School

Clark Lane Middle School

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Transportation Equity Analysis

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

1GOOD LEADERSHIP IS IMPORTANT. Principal Effectiveness and Leadership in an Era of Accountability: What Research Says

DAS-REMI District Accountability System Reporting, Evaluating, and Monitoring Instrument for the P2E2020SBP

Denver Public Schools

What Does ESSA Mean for English Learners and #ESSAforELs

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

School Performance Plan Middle/High Schools

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Garland Independent School District Davis Elementary School Improvement Plan

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Implementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

AYP: Adequate Yearly Progress

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Iva Meairs Elementary School

State Parental Involvement Plan

SY School Performance Plan

El Toro Elementary School

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Charter School Performance Comparable to Other Public Schools; Stronger Accountability Needed

Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

FOUR STARS OUT OF FOUR

Access Center Assessment Report

New Jersey Department of Education

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

2015 Annual Report to the School Community

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

Every student absence jeopardizes the ability of students to succeed at school and schools to

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

School Data Profile/Analysis

Idaho Public Schools

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

Nutrition Assistance Program Report Series Office of Policy Support

1110 Main Street, East Hartford, CT Tel: (860) Fax: (860)

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Transcription:

race / ethnicity years employed Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Elementary/Middle School Profile - Spring 18 Welcome School Information Phone Management Type School profiles present a summary of up to three years of public schoolwide data on each school in the district. They include information on principal and teacher tenure, official enrollment, student demographics, attendance, suspensions, and the school survey. This profile also reports results from the Kindergarten Assessment (KRA) and Partnership for Assessment of for College and Careers (PARCC) assessments for Grades 3 through 8. For more information, visit baltimorecityschools.org Enrollment & Demographics 41-396-756 Traditional Address Grades Served 375 Greenspring Avenue PK - 8 Baltimore, MD 21211 Principal Tenure with City Schools Rachel Brunson 33 years Teachers Official figures are based on full-time teachers as of 1/15/. Percentage of Teachers by Tenure in City Schools Total No. of 1+ No Data Available 1. Teachers 6-1. 3-5 25. -2 45. % of teachers Student enrollment is determined on September 3,. 18 Total Student Enrollment 18 Percentage of Enrollment by Demographic African American 97.4 1.6 37 314 36 Hispanic/ 16 18 16-18 Percentage of Enrollment in Low Income Subgroup 18 Percentage of Enrollment by Subgroup In 15-16, the City Schools became a Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) district, as such, no longer collecting the free or reduced-price meals (FARMs) form as a way to capture poverty status of its students. Instead, the district uses direct certification as the primary poverty measure to meet the state and federal reporting requirements. Direct certification of homeless or foster care status, participation in programs for low-income families (e.g., SNAP, TANF) as a proxy for poverty has some challenges as some low-income families do not participate. As such, the district may update its reporting in the School Profile to include any adjusted district created poverty measure. Direct certification rates from SY 15-16 to SY -18 are provided to show year to year comparisons using the same methodology. Please note: rates in this year s Profile were calculated without Medicaid which is a change from the 16/17 Profile rates which included Medicaid. 85.6 78.8 77.5 16 18 EL. SWD 17.6 1. Students with Disabilities 82.4 non-el General Ed Key: EL = i.e., students whose primary or home language is not English and have been assessed as having limited English proficiency; SWD = Students with Disabilities i.e., those who have current Individualized Education Programs. An asterisk () indicates less than 1% data not reported.

Attendance Attendance rates are calculated by dividing the total number of days attended by the total number of days enrolled during the school year. Chronic absence rate is the percent of students who were absent more than days, among students who were enrolled for at least 9 days during the school year. Data are for the school year ending in the calendar year indicated (i.e., "" indicates the 16-17 school year). Suspensions The number of suspensions in a school year includes all suspension incidents and expulsions. Attendance Rate (%) Chronic Absence Rate (%) Count of Suspension Incidents 1 89.5 89.7 87.4 1 1 8 8 6 4 6 4 29.9 25.1 39.9 18 13 35 15 16 15 16 15 16 School Survey The annual school survey is given to students in grades 3 to 12, all school-based staff, and parents of students in pre-k to grade 12. Three separate indices were calculated that represent a combination of student, staff, and parent reports. They reflect key measures of school climate as defined by the National School Climate Center. Data are not reported when any of the three groups had 5 or fewer respondents, or if the response rates for students or staff were less than 3 percent. The Physical Security Index measures the extent to which students and staff feel safe in a school building, parents feel that their child is safe, and students fighting and bringing weapons to school is NOT a problem. The Respectful Relationships Index measures the extent to which students and staff report that there are respectful relationships among students and between students and staff at their school. The School Connectedness Index measures the extent to which students and staff feel they belong at the school, that parents feel welcome, that staff and parents work closely to meet students needs, and that the administration is responsive to parent and staff concerns. Data are for the school year ending in the calendar year indicated (i.e., "" indicates the 16-17 school year). For detailed information, visit the City Schools website. Physical Security Index Respectful Relationships Index School Connectedness Index 1 8 6 4 57. 57.1 57.5 1 8 6 4 42.1 35.1 34.3 1 8 6 4 72. 69.3 73.2 15 16 15 16 15 16-2 -

PARCC Results - Grades 3-5 The PARCC (Partnership for Assessment of for College and Careers) assessment, aligned to Maryland s College and Career-Ready Standards, is administered in both and ELA in Grades 3-8 and for students in Algebra I, Algebra II, and English 1. Results are color coded and categorized by the percentage of students achieving each performance level. exceeded indicates the total percentage of students achieving performance levels 4 or 5 on the PARCC exam (those performance levels, respectively, signify that students have met or exceeded expectations for grade level learning). A value of '' indicates that the data is suppressed due to the number of students tested. The percentages of students in each performance level may not add up to 1 due to rounding; the percentages of students in levels 4 and 5 may not add up to the total " exceeded" due to rounding. MATHEMATICS ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Percent at Each Performance Level - All Students, Percent at Each Performance Level - All Students, 46.4 5. 29.8 19. 4.8. 29.8 14.3 4.8 1.2 exceeded, 16-84 Students Tested 84 Students Tested 5% 16% 39% 6% 15% 39% 6% 14% 41% 16 exceeded, 16 16 - Year School District State Year School District 6% 13% 39% State 1 - Have Not Met Expectations 2 - Partially Met Expectations 3 - Approached Expectations 4 - Met Expectations 5 - Exceeded Expectations Race/Ethnicity, 15 - Race/Ethnicity, 15-4.8 6. 5.7 5.7 Subgroup, 15 - Students with. Disabilities. Subgroup, 15 - Students with. Disabilities. 4.5 5.2 6.1 6.5 Denotes subgroup with fewer than 1 students who took the test. disadvantaged (ED) indicates students who have been identified as enrolled in a direct certification program, including Medicaid. Starting in SY 15-16 ED is the new terminology used to refer to students historically identified as low-income or FARMs students under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). "n/a" indicates the test is not given at this school. - 3 -

PARCC Results - Grades 6-8 The PARCC (Partnership for Assessment of for College and Careers) assessment, aligned to Maryland s College and Career-Ready Standards, is administered in both and ELA in Grades 3-8 and for students in Algebra I, Algebra II, and English 1. Results are color coded and categorized by the percentage of students achieving each performance level. exceeded indicates the total percentage of students achieving performance levels 4 or 5 on the PARCC exam (those performance levels, respectively, signify that students have met or exceeded expectations for grade level learning). A value of '' indicates that the data is suppressed due to the number of students tested. The percentages of students in each performance level may not add up to 1 due to rounding; the percentages of students in levels 4 and 5 may not add up to the total " exceeded" due to rounding. MATHEMATICS ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Percent at Each Performance Level - All Students, Percent at Each Performance Level - All Students, 58.7 27.5 12.8.9. 38. 31.5 22.2 7.4.9 exceeded 16-19 Students Tested 18 Students Tested 1% 9% 26% exceeded 16 16-16 8% 16% 4% 1% 8% 27% 2% 15% 38% Year School District State Year School District State 1 - Have Not Met Expectations 2 - Partially Met Expectations 3 - Approached Expectations 4 - Met Expectations 5 - Exceeded Expectations Race/Ethnicity, 15 - Race/Ethnicity, 15 -.9 8.4 1. 2.1 Subgroup, 15 - Students with. Disabilities. Subgroup, 15 - Students with. Disabilities. 1.1 1.2 6.7 2.4 Denotes subgroup with fewer than 1 students who took the test. disadvantaged (ED) indicates students who have been identified as enrolled in a direct certification program, including Medicaid. Starting in SY 15-16 ED is the new terminology used to refer to students historically identified as low-income or FARMs students under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). "n/a" indicates the test is not given at this school. - 4 -

Kindergarten Assessment (KRA) Results Maryland's Kindergarten Assessment (KRA) is administered to incoming kindergarteners each fall. The KRA uses age-appropriate performance tasks and observations to measure specific skills and determine what each entering kindergartener knows and is able to do in four specific domains: Language & Literacy, ematics, Physical Well-Being & Motor Development, and Social Foundations. These domains have the greatest impact on overall kindergarten readiness. Students receive a scaled score in each of the domains, as well as a composite score aggregating the four domains. Students receive one of three readiness measures:,, and. Data are for the school year ending in the calendar year indicated (i.e., "18" indicates the -18 school year). For more information visit http://www.readyatfive.org. 18 KRA At-a-Glance, Composite (%) Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Elementary/Middle 8.7 21.7 (%) City Schools 21.3 37.9 4.9 (%) State of Maryland 18. 37. 45. (%) Composite Domains Language and Literacy Total Students 23 2 5 16 28 4 9 15 Total Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Elementary/Middle Kindergarten, & 18 Student Counts by Category (N) Not Yet 23 16 28 14 14 18 18 KRA - Percentage per Category, Composite (%) 8.7 14.3 7 3.4 21.7 KRA - Percentage per Category, Domain (%) 5. 32.1 53.6 5. 24 18 6 29 23 6 18 75. 79.3 25..7 Physical Development 24 7 17 29 1 19 18 29.2 34.5 7.8 65.5 Social Foundations 24 4 29 6 23 18 16.7.7 83.3 79.3 "Student Counts by Category (N)" is the number of students in each category of the KRA. 18 City Schools Kindergarten Composite (%) Composite (%) 21.3 37.9 4.9 Language and Literacy Physical Development Social Foundations 63.1 72.1 45. 46.2 Domains (%) Not Yet Domains (%) 36.9 27.9 55. 53.8 "KRA Percentage by Category" is the percentage of students in each category of the KRA. 18 State of Maryland Kindergarten Language and Literacy Physical Development Social Foundations Not Yet 6 63 44 46 18 37 45 4 37 56 54-5 -