Antelope Creek Elementary School 6185 Springview Dr. Rocklin, CA Grades K-6 Brian Arcuri, Principal

Similar documents
Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

El Toro Elementary School

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Engage Educate Empower

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Shelters Elementary School

Val Verde Unified School District

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Val Verde Unified School District

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Hokulani Elementary School

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Kahului Elementary School

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Cuero Independent School District

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

State Parental Involvement Plan

Antioch Charter Academy II

Clark Lane Middle School

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Student Transportation

University of Arizona

12-month Enrollment

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

African American Male Achievement Update

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Organization Profile

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

Financing Education In Minnesota

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Educational Attainment

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Transcription:

Antelope Creek Elementary School 6185 Springview Dr. Rocklin, CA 95677-29 916.632.195 Grades K-6 Brian Arcuri, Principal barcuri@rocklin.k12.ca.us 212-13 School Accountability Report Card Published During the 213-14 School Year About the SARC Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. All data are reported for the 212-13 school-year, unless otherwise indicated. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC webpage at www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For additional information about this school, please contact the school administration at 916.632.195. Rocklin Unified School District 2615 Sierra Meadows Drive Rocklin, CA 95677 (916) 624-2428 www.rocklinusd.org District Governing Board Camille Maben Todd Lowell Greg Daley Steve Paul Wendy Lang District Administration Roger Stock Superintendent School Description Antelope Creek Elementary opened in 1992 and is one of sixteen schools in the Rocklin Unified School District. The school serves students in grades kindergarten through sixth grade, with an enrollment of approximately 48. In addition, the campus is home to two of the Transitional Kindergarten classrooms available to students in the district. The school is located in the center of a dynamic and supportive community which expresses its values toward education through a high level of participation. It was named a California Distinguished School in 21. Antelope Creek Elementary School s staff, students, and parents make up an exemplary community of learners. The focus is on the development of lifelong skills in a caring, exciting environment which fosters self-esteem and individual development. A great deal of value is placed on the many ways to approach learning and the different experiences and opinions each person brings to the learning process. The staff recognizes that making learning meaningful to the student enhances the learning. Therefore, subjects are presented in thematic or integrated units whenever possible. Along with the academics, emphasis is also placed on the development of student responsibility and initiative through the Leader in Me curriculum on campus. Parents play an important role at the school through active participation and involvement in School Site Council, PTA and district committees. They share information with classes about professional lives, teach special skills (art, music, and sports), work on school or playground improvements, conduct fund-raisers, and make donations. Parents regularly volunteer their services in the classrooms. The school has become a focal point in the community and our facilities are used frequently by our community groups. Mission Statement Together We Learn, Together We Lead. Opportunities for Parental Involvement Parental involvement is available through our school s Site Council, Parent-Teacher Association, field trips, and general classroom volunteering. Our Site Council and PTA both have monthly meetings and provide many opportunities to assist students and staff. Barbara Branges is our Site Council president. Janet Ramirez coordinates staff with parent volunteers and maintains volunteer records. Ms. Ramirez can be reached at (916) 632-195, ext. 22. 212-13 School Accountability Report Card for Antelope Creek Elementary School Page 1 of 7

Student Enrollment by Grade Level Grade Level Number of Students Kinder. 74 Gr. 1-- 55 Gr. 2-- 53 Gr. 3-- 78 Gr. 4-- 63 Gr. 5-- 63 Gr. 6-- 61 Total-- 447 Student Enrollment by Group Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American------- 1.3 American Indian or Alaska Native---.9 Asian------- 4.3 Filipino------- 1.6 Hispanic or Latino------- 17. Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander.7 White 64.4 Two or More Races 8.7 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 44.3 English Learners 1.1 Students with Disabilities 1.7 Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution Average Class Size Number of Classrooms* 1-2 21-32 33+ Year 11 12 13 11 12 13 11 12 13 11 12 13 Kinder. 2.3 26 25 1 2 2 3 Gr. 1-- 28 25.5 18 1 2 2 2 Gr. 2-- 24 19 18 1 1 2 2 2 Gr. 3-- 23.3 25.5 2 1 1 2 2 3 Gr. 4-- 26 3 21 1 2 2 2 Gr. 5-- 29.5 23.5 21 1 1 2 1 2 Gr. 6-- 24.7 29.5 2 1 1 2 2 2 * Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area, English, Math, Science and Social Science (SS), rather than grade level. Suspensions and Expulsions School 1-11 11-12 12-13 Suspensions Rate 5.37 4.92 3.8 Expulsions Rate District 1-11 11-12 12-13 Suspensions Rate 3.89 4.19 3.17 Expulsions Rate.9.2.9 * The rate of suspensions and expulsions is calculated by dividing the total number of incidents by the total enrollment (and multiplying by 1). School Safety Plan This section provides information about the school s comprehensive safety plan, including the dates on which the safety plan was last reviewed, updated, and discussed with faculty; as well as a brief description of the key elements of the plan. All schools in the district have a comprehensive School Safety Plan approved by the School Site Council. It includes an assessment of the current status of school crime, procedures to notify teachers of dangerous pupils, disaster procedures, child abuse reporting procedures, discipline rules and procedures, dress code, policies regarding suspension/expulsion, sexual harassment policy, procedures for ingress and egress. It includes an action plan for the implementation of the plan. The Safe School Committee has been responsible for assessing and implementing procedures that promote student safety. The Safe School Plan focuses on increasing student and staff awareness of bullying behaviors and strategies to deal with bullying, and opportunities to consistently reinforce procedures, school rules, and recognize positive student behaviors. We review safety issues regarding crisis response, implementing drills at recess, and planning for a school wide evacuation drill. Last review/update and discussion with staff: January, 214. School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (School Year 213-14) This section provides information from the most recent Facility Inspection Tool (FIT) data (or equivalent), including: Description of the safety, cleanliness, and adequacy of the school facility Description of any planned or recently completed facility improvements The year and month in which the data were collected Description of any needed maintenance to ensure good repair Year and month in which data were collected: January, 213 Antelope Creek is located in a beautiful setting on nine acres. A focal point of the school is the centrally located courtyard with an outdoor stage. The multipurpose room hosts a basketball court and a stage with full lighting and sound equipment. The library houses a growing collection of 8, books, a computerized library checkout system, and a four-station computer reference area. The thirty-station computer lab and the computers in the library, classrooms, and administration building are all linked by a fully networked computer system. All K through 6th grade classrooms have been upgraded with Smart Classroom Technology. The district takes great efforts to ensure that all schools are clean, safe, and functional. To assist in this effort, the district uses a facility survey instrument developed by the State of California Office of Public School Construction. District maintenance ensures that the repairs necessary to keep the school sites in good repair and working order are completed in a timely manner. A work order process is used to ensure efficient service and that emergency repairs are given the highest priority. 212-13 School Accountability Report Card for Antelope Creek Elementary School Page 2 of 7

School Facility Good Repair Status (School Year 213-14) This section provides information from the most recent Facility Inspection Tool (FIT) data (or equivalent), including: Determination of repair status for systems listed Description of any needed maintenance to ensure good repair The Overall Rating (bottom row) System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences School Facility Good Repair Status Repair Status Good Fair Poor Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned A few stained ceiling tiles will be replaced. Overall Rating Exemplary Good Fair Poor [ ] Teacher Credentials School 1-11 11-12 12-13 Fully Credentialed 23 22 23 Without Full Credential Teaching Outside Subject Area Districtwide 1-11 11-12 12-13 Fully Credentialed 513 Without Full Credential Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions at this School School 11-12 12-13 13-14 Teachers of English Learners Total Teacher Misassignments Vacant Teacher Positions * Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. Professional Development This section provides information on the number of days provided for professional development and continuous professional growth in the most recent three year period. The Rocklin Unified School District is committed to high quality professional development that meets the needs of the staff aligned to the established Board s Strategic Priorities. The focus of our Professional Development is the following: A continuous development and commitment to Professional Learning Communities, a commitment to systematic research based effective teaching strategies and intervention strategies, to ensure that all students are provided the necessary skills and prerequisites to meet post-secondary goals and to prepare all students with 21st Century and California Common Core Standards. At Antelope Creek there has been a dual focus on the development of academic intervention programs and Professional Learning Communities. 212-13 School Accountability Report Card for Antelope Creek Elementary School Page 3 of 7

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers The Federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB), requires that core academic subjects be taught by Highly Qualified Teachers, defined as having at least a bachelor s degree, an appropriate California teaching credential, and demonstrated core academic subject area competence. For more information, see the CDE Improving Teacher and Principal Quality webpage at: www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/tq/ Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Location of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers This School 1.. Districtwide All Schools 1.. High-Poverty Schools 1.. Low-Poverty Schools 1.. * High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 4 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 25 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff at this School Number of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Academic Counselor------- Social/Behavioral or Career Development Counselor Library Media Teacher (Librarian).1 Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) Psychologist-------.6 Social Worker------- Nurse-------.1 Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist.8 Resource Specialist------- Other------- Average Number of Students per Staff Member Academic Counselor------- * One Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full-time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 5 percent of full-time. Level Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 211-12) Expenditures Per Pupil Total Restricted Unrestricted Average Teacher Salary School Site- $5,466 $1,37 $4,96 $69,785 District------ $5,146 $64,627 State------- $5,537 $68,841 Percent Difference: School Site/District -2.4 8. Percent Difference: School Site/ State -26. 1.4 * Supplemental/Restricted expenditures come from money whose use is controlled by law or by a donor. Money that is designated for specific purposes by the district or governing board is not considered restricted. * Basic/Unrestricted expenditures are from money whose use, except for general guidelines, is not controlled by law or by a donor. For detailed information on school expenditures for all districts in California, see the CDE Current Expense of Education & Per-pupil Spending webpage at www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/ec/. For information on teacher salaries for all districts in California, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits webpage at www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. To look up expenditures and salaries for a specific school district, see the Ed-Data Web site at: www.ed-data.org. Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 211-12) Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $34,997 $4,933 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $61,828 $65,87 Highest Teacher Salary $8,856 $84,436 Average Principal Salary (ES) $14,193 $16,715 Average Principal Salary (MS) $17,6 $111,25 Average Principal Salary (HS) $118,158 $12,56 Superintendent Salary $193,87 $27,812 Percent of District Budget Teacher Salaries 44.8% 39.8% Administrative Salaries 5.6% 5.1% * For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits webpage at www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 212-13) This section provides specific information about the types of programs and services available at the school that support and assists students. For example, this narrative may include information about supplemental educational services related to the school s federal Program Improvement (PI) status. Special Education, School and Library and Improvement Program, Title I, transportation, instructional materials, staff development, intervention classes, CORE K-12 classes, Gifted and Talented Education (GATE). 212-13 School Accountability Report Card for Antelope Creek Elementary School Page 4 of 7

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 213-14) This section describes whether the textbooks and instructional materials used at the school are from the most recent adoption; whether there are sufficient textbooks and instruction materials for each student; and information about the school s use of any supplemental curriculum or non-adopted textbooks or instructional materials. Year and month in which data were collected: 5-18-212 Core Curriculum Area Reading/Language Arts Mathematics Science History-Social Science Textbooks and Instructional Materials Textbooks and Instructional Materials/Year of Adoption 212-13 School Accountability Report Card for Antelope Creek Elementary School Page 5 of 7

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. The Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program consists of several key components, including: California Standards Tests (CSTs), which include Englishlanguage arts (ELA) and mathematics (Math) in grades two through eleven; science in grades five, eight, and nine through eleven; and history-social science (H-SS) in grades eight, and nine through eleven. California Modified Assessment (CMA), an alternate assessment that is based on modified achievement standards in ELA for grades three through eleven; mathematics for grades three through seven, Algebra I, and Geometry; and science in grades five and eight, and Life Science in grade ten. The CMA is designed to assess those students whose disabilities preclude them from achieving grade-level proficiency on an assessment of the California content standards with or without accommodations. California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA), includes ELA and mathematics in grades two through eleven, and science for grades five, eight, and ten. The CAPA is given to those students with significant cognitive disabilities whose disabilities prevent them from taking either the CSTs with accommodations or modifications or the CMA with accommodations. The assessments under the STAR Program show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. On each of these assessments, student scores are reported as performance levels. For detailed information regarding the STAR Program results for each grade and performance level, including the Percent of Students not tested, see the CDE STAR Results Web site at star.cde.ca.gov. Subject STAR Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced School District State 1-11 11-12 12-13 1-11 11-12 12-13 1-11 11-12 12-13 ELA---- 61 72 68 76 78 77 54 56 55 Math--- 74 75 76 68 69 71 49 5 5 Science 71 87 66 85 85 84 57 6 59 H-SS--- 75 75 72 48 49 49 Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible. Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. Group 213 STAR Results by Student Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced ELA Math Science H-SS All Students in the LEA 77 71 84 72 All Student at the School 68 76 67 Male------- 64 75 62 Female------- 73 77 72 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian------- Filipino------- Hispanic or Latino 62 72 43 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander White------- 69 75 74 Two or More Races------- 78 88 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 61 7 53 English Learners------- 19 44 Students with Disabilities 33 44 Students Receiving Migrant Education Services California Physical Fitness Test Results The California Physical Fitness Test (PFT) is administered to students in grades five, seven, and nine only. This table displays by grade level the Percent of Students meeting the fitness standards for the most recent testing period. For detailed information regarding this test, and comparisons of a school s test results to the district and state, see the CDE PFT webpage at www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/pf/. Grade Level Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards 4 of 6 5 of 6 6 of 6 ---5--- 11.1 3.2 44.4 DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest webpage at dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., state Academic Performance Index [API], federal Adequate Yearly Progress [AYP]), test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners. 212-13 School Accountability Report Card for Antelope Creek Elementary School Page 6 of 7

Academic Performance Index The Academic Performance Index (API) is an annual measure of state academic performance and progress of schools in California. API scores range from 2 to 1,, with a statewide target of 8. For detailed information about the API, see the CDE API webpage at www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/. API Growth by Student Group Three-Year Comparison Group Actual API Change 1-11 11-12 12-13 All Students at the School -6 27-8 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian------- Filipino------- Hispanic or Latino -28 7-26 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander White------- -2 17-3 Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 17 4-1 English Learners Students with Disabilities Academic Performance Index Ranks - Three-Year Comparison This table displays the school s statewide and similar schools API ranks. The statewide API rank ranges from 1 to 1. A statewide rank of 1 means that the school has an API score in the lowest ten percent of all schools in the state, while a statewide rank of 1 means that the school has an API score in the highest ten percent of all schools in the state. The similar schools API rank reflects how a school compares to 1 statistically matched similar schools. A similar schools rank of 1 means that the school s academic performance is comparable to the lowest performing ten schools of the 1 similar schools, while a similar schools rank of 1 means that the school s academic performance is better than at least 9 of the 1 similar schools. Academic Performance Index Ranks - Three-Year Comparison API Rank 21 211 212 Statewide------- 8 7 8 Similar Schools------- 7 8 1 Federal Intervention Program (School Year 213-14) Schools and districts receiving federal Title I funding enter Program Improvement (PI) if they do not make AYP for two consecutive years in the same content area (ELA or mathematics) or on the same indicator (API or graduation rate). After entering PI, schools and districts advance to the next level of intervention with each additional year that they do not make AYP. For detailed information about PI identification, see the CDE PI Status Determinations webpage: www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/tidetermine.asp. Indicator School District Program Improvement Status In PI Not In PI First Year of Program Improvement 213-214 Year in Program Improvement Year 1 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 6 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 75. API Growth by Student Group - 213 Growth API Comparison This table displays, by student group, the number of students included in the API and the 213 Growth API (API-G) at the school, district, and state level. All Students at the School Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Group School District State Students 299 8,541 4,655,989 API-G 878 891 79 Students 5 122 296,463 API-G 836 78 Students 3 34 3,394 API-G 86 743 Asian------- Students 11 498 46,527 API-G 936 932 96 Filipino------- Students 7 251 121,54 Hispanic or Latino Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander API-G 916 867 Students 53 1,166 2,438,951 API-G 854 857 744 Students 2 37 25,351 API-G 85 774 White------- Students 187 5,99 1,2,127 Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged API-G 866 895 853 Students 28 51 125,25 API-G 92 92 824 Students 138 1,832 2,774,64 API-G 851 83 743 English Learners Students 29 513 1,482,316 Students with Disabilities API-G 81 85 721 Students 48 984 527,476 API-G 727 725 615 Adequate Yearly Progress The federal ESEA requires that all schools and districts meet the following Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) criteria: Participation rate on the state s standards-based assessments in ELA and mathematics Percent proficient on the state s standards-based assessments in ELA and mathematics API as an additional indicator Graduation rate (for secondary schools) Detailed information about AYP, can be found at the CDE Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) webpage at www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/. AYP Criteria School District Made AYP Overall No No Met Participation Rate: English-Language Arts Met Participation Rate: Mathematics Met Percent Proficient: English-Language Arts No No Met Percent Proficient: Mathematics No No Met API Criteria Met Graduation Rate (if applicable) N/A No 212-13 School Accountability Report Card for Antelope Creek Elementary School Page 7 of 7