MOORPARK COLLEGE GUIDED PATHWAYS

Similar documents
State Budget Update February 2016

CCC Online Education Initiative and Canvas. November 3, 2015

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Rachel Edmondson Adult Learner Analyst Jaci Leonard, UIC Analyst

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

December 1966 Edition. The Birth of the Program

Physics/Astronomy/Physical Science. Program Review

California State University EAP Updates 2016

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

DRAFT VERSION 2, 02/24/12

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

District Consultation Council Meeting. April 24, :00 p.m. Anaheim Campus Room 105 AGENDA

8. Prerequisites, corequisites (If applicable) Prerequisites: ACCTG 1 (Financial Accounting) ACCTG 168 (Tax Accounting)

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

ÉCOLE MANACHABAN MIDDLE SCHOOL School Education Plan May, 2017 Year Three

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Executive Summary & District Action

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Texas Woman s University Libraries

School Leadership Rubrics

CONTRACT TENURED FACULTY

Distinguished Teacher Review

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Economics at UCD. Professor Karl Whelan Presentation at Open Evening January 17, 2017

ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Student Packets and Teacher Guide. Grades 6, 7, 8

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

TACOMA HOUSING AUTHORITY

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

The Talent Development High School Model Context, Components, and Initial Impacts on Ninth-Grade Students Engagement and Performance

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

JFK Middle College. Summer & Fall 2014

SERVICE-LEARNING Annual Report July 30, 2004 Kara Hartmann, Service-Learning Coordinator Page 1 of 5

BSP !!! Trainer s Manual. Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University. M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

The completed proposal should be forwarded to the Chief Instructional Officer and the Academic Senate.

EAP. updates KHENG WAICHE. early proficiency programs coordinator

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

UH STEM Pathways Project

State Parental Involvement Plan

A minimum of six (6) T1 or T2 Team Leaders and thirty (30) L1 or L2 Leadership Facilitators (see Facil. app.)

The Impact of Honors Programs on Undergraduate Academic Performance, Retention, and Graduation

SSTATE SYSIP STEMIC IMPROVEMENT PL A N APRIL 2016

Name: STEP 1: Starting Questions. Description PSII Learner.. PSII Teacher.

Synthesis Essay: The 7 Habits of a Highly Effective Teacher: What Graduate School Has Taught Me By: Kamille Samborski

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Trauma Informed Child-Parent Psychotherapy (TI-CPP) Application Guidance for

University of Toronto

Program Rating Sheet - University of South Carolina - Columbia Columbia, South Carolina

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Introduction: SOCIOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias

Spring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview

Comprehensive Student Services Program Review

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

A MEANINGFUL CAREER IN LESS THAN ONE YEAR MASTER IN TEACHING

Loyalist College Applied Degree Proposal. Name of Institution: Loyalist College of Applied Arts and Technology

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

LATTC Program Review Instructional -Department Level

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

DELIVERING A DEMAND LED SYSTEM IN THE U.S. THE ALAMO COMMUNITY COLLEGES APPROACH

IEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES

Contra Costa College: HBCU Tour 2017 Due by Monday, January 9, Transfer Center SAB 227

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

html

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

California State University, Chico College of Business Graduate Business Program Program Alignment Matrix Academic Year

This Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.

COVER PAGE. UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM Growth Agenda for Wisconsin Grants Program

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Transcription:

Year 1 of 5 Inquiry and Design Introduction The California Guided Pathway Project is designed to substantially improve our students chances of completing their educational and career preparation goals. The idea behind the guided pathways framework is straightforward college students are more likely to complete a degree in a timely fashion if they choose a program and develop an academic plan early on, have a clear road map of the courses they need to take to complete a credential, and receive guidance and support to help them stay on plan. 1 Moorpark College has a long-standing, and well-recognized, reputation for being student-centered. We are known for our dedication to providing excellent student support and quality instruction. Over the last three years, our students are successfully Passing their classes (with a grade of C or better) at an average rate of 75% each semester 2 Completing college-level math courses within their first year at an average rate of 37% 3 Completing college-level English courses within their first year at an average rate of 61% Completing their first fall semester and returning in the very next spring semester an average rate of 70% Although the above rates are to be celebrated, only 17% of our 2010-11 transfer-focused, full-time, firsttime college students 4 actually transferred to a four-year institution within three years (where only 51% of these students transferred to a four-year institution within 6 years). What barriers are our students facing that are preventing them from transferring within three-years? Are our students completing their CTE certificates in a timely fashion? Are some student populations facing greater barriers than others? What can we do to improve our students time-to-completion? We are striving to find answers to these questions (and other questions that will undoubtedly arise) through the conversations and analyses that will take place through the activities identified in our 2018-19 Guided Pathways Plan. Cross-Functional Workgroups Moorpark College began its exploration into the Guided Pathways framework in Spring 2017, with professional development events that included presentations provided by experts in the nationwide guided pathways implementation. 5 Through these discussions and the writing of the college s 2017 Self- Assessment, the college decided to begin our exploration of guided pathways through four workgroups, coordinated by a steering group consisting of a diverse group of members representing a wide range of college programs and perspectives. The four workgroups (Inquiry Teams) will conduct gap analyses, explore options of high-impact practices, and design potential strategies for implementation in the following areas: 1. Program Mapping (of existing curriculum) 2. Meta-Majors (also known as Academic Clusters) 3. Student Support (scaling our existing first-year experience support services) 4. Education & Career Alignment (including Dual Enrollment, Career & Technical Education, and General Education/Transfer) March 2, 2018 Moorpark College Guided Pathways White Paper 1 P a g e

The 2018-19 Guided Pathways Plan describes the intent of each of these workgroups, identifying expected outcomes, and aligning their work with existing efforts already in place for our students. Program Mapping Inquiry Team It has been suggested, and national research appears to support, that the typical structure of our academic programs can be unclear and confusing for our students: Paths to completion for our programs are unclear Course sequencing is not defined Course scheduling is unpredictable and only made available to students one semester at a time Curriculum in high schools and other feeders is not clearly, or consistently, aligned to college requirements The guided pathways framework suggests that program faculty and counselors work together to fully map out course sequences, aligning our coursework with transfer-institutions requirements and/or career advancement. The Moorpark College Program Mapping Inquiry Team will explore and define how we envision program mapping for our students. Over the remaining weeks of Spring 2018, this Inquiry Team will: Explore options and research best practices for creating program maps that best provide a comprehensive education for our students Begin a gap analysis to summarize current challenges, identifying areas to focus upon Develop appropriate research questions, identifying the data elements that would provide useful insight into existing barriers that our students might be facing This Inquiry Team will continue its work in the 2018-19 academic year; it will: Continue its gap analysis Analyze disaggregated student data, including the data elements identified in Spring 2018, to identify current challenges and potential barriers to successful completion of programs Develop the college s vision for mapping programs, defining our program mapping strategy Meet with individual program faculty and staff to discuss vision and identify potential areas of concern Will define how we will evaluate progress of implementation and how to measure successful implementation Will organize at least one Y All Come campus meeting each semester to: o Present gap analysis results/conclusions o Facilitate discussion regarding intended program mapping strategies and any potential concerns about program mapping o Provide updates on progress In addition, over the course of the 2018-19 academic year, under the guidance of the Program Mapping Inquiry Team, counselors and program faculty will collaborate to develop specific program maps, mapping existing curriculum and possibly identifying any existing curriculum gaps. The goal is to complete program maps for 50% of the college s programs (approximately 30 program maps) before the end of the 2018-19 academic year; the remaining programs will complete their maps in the following academic year. March 2, 2018 Moorpark College Guided Pathways White Paper 2 P a g e

Meta-Majors (Academic Clusters) Inquiry Team It has been suggested, and national research appears to support, that having too many choices leads to indecision, procrastination, self-doubt, and decision paralysis; students handle complex decisions better if they are helped to think through options hierarchically, in simplified sets of options. 6 The guided pathways framework suggests the use of meta-majors (clusters of similar programs that students may first start to explore prior to committing to a specific major), which are designed to help students make course choices that will move them toward their long-term career goals, while still permitting students to customize their schedules. The Moorpark College Meta-Majors Inquiry Team will explore how we envision guided major- and career exploration opportunities through the grouping of academic clusters for our students. Over the remaining weeks of Spring 2018, this Inquiry Team will: Explore options and research best practices for creating a meta-majors structure that best provides guided major- and career-exploration opportunities for our students Identify a meaningful name/branding for this area of inquiry; the term meta-majors is not necessarily understood. Input from current students, as well as potential students (students currently in our service-area high schools) will be sought Begin a gap analysis to summarize current challenges, identifying areas to focus upon Develop appropriate research questions, identifying the data elements that would provide useful insight into existing barriers that our students might be facing This Inquiry Team will continue its work in Fall 2018; it will: Continue its gap analysis Analyze disaggregated student data, including the data elements identified in Spring 2018, to identify current challenges and potential barriers to successful completion of programs Determine whether or not to implement a meta-major strategy for our students (before the end of the Fall 2018 semester) If the college decides to move forward with the meta-major strategy, in Spring 2019, this Inquiry Team will: Meet with faculty and staff to discuss vision and identify potential areas of concern Develop the meta-major structure that best provides guided major- and career-exploration opportunities for our students Will organize at least one Y All Come campus meeting each semester to: o Present gap analysis results/conclusions o Facilitate discussion regarding intended strategies and any potential concerns o Provide updates on progress Will define how we will evaluate progress of implementation and how to measure successful implementation March 2, 2018 Moorpark College Guided Pathways White Paper 3 P a g e

Student Support Inquiry Team It is well recognized that students need far more communication, feedback, and support than what our current support structures can provide. Existing student support programs, such as EOPs, ACCESS, Athletics, GPS (our first year experience), student leadership, and other programs across the campus, have been able to provide support to specific, and often narrowly focused groups of students. Our college would like to determine how these very specific efforts could be scaled-up allowing us to reach a greater number of students. The guided pathways framework suggests that colleges become more intentional in providing academic and non-academic support services in a way that is proactive and aligned with instruction, so that all students are explicitly engaged in these services. Building upon the successes of our existing specific student support programs, the Student Support Inquiry Team will explore best practices in scaling student support strategies, in alignment with instruction Over the remaining weeks of Spring 2018, this Inquiry Team will: Explore options and best practices for providing comprehensive and focused student support for our students Begin a gap analysis to summarize current challenges, identifying areas to focus upon Develop appropriate research questions, identifying the data elements that would provide useful insight into existing barriers that our students might be facing This Inquiry Team will continue its work in the 2018-19 academic year; it will: Continue its gap analysis Analyze disaggregated student data, including the data elements identified in Spring 2018, to identify current challenges and potential barriers to successful completion of programs Identify student support needs and develop strategies to provide appropriate and timely support for more of our students over the course of their educational pathway Will define how we will evaluate progress of implementation and how to measure successful implementation Will organize at least one Y All Come campus meeting to: o Present gap analysis results/conclusions o Facilitate discussion regarding student support strategies Education and Career Alignment Inquiry Team The college has identified the need to improve the pipeline leading students from high school to Moorpark College into career preparedness (which may or may not require transfer to a four-year institution, and possibly into a graduate program). The guided pathways framework suggests that colleges engage in systematic coordination with K-12, four-year institutions, and industry partners to inform and align program requirements. The Educational and Career Alignment Inquiry Team will explore and define strategies for K-12 pathways, career pathways, and pathways to four-year institutions. Due to the complexity of this task, the college will primarily focus on the K-12 pathways in 2018-19. Over the entirety of the Spring 2018 semester, this Inquiry Team has, and will continue to: March 2, 2018 Moorpark College Guided Pathways White Paper 4 P a g e

Explore options and best practices for providing dual enrollment packages for our local high schools Develop specific dual enrollment sequences that will inform our Fall 2018 schedule development This Inquiry Team will continue its work in the 2018-19 academic year; it will: Develop an overall strategy for providing coordinated pathways, to increase the college-going culture throughout our community Begin a gap analysis to summarize current challenges, identifying areas to focus upon Develop appropriate research questions, identifying the data elements that would provide useful insight into existing barriers that our students might be facing Analyze disaggregated student data, including the data elements identified in Spring 2018, to identify current challenges and potential barriers to successful completion of programs Will define how we will evaluate progress of implementation and how to measure successful implementation The Implementation Timeline and Key Elements of Guided Pathways Plan Not Yet Addressed There are 14 Key Elements to be addressed as part of our implementation plan for our guided pathways framework; however, it has been made clear through the instructions of this year s plan that we are not expected to address all 14 elements during this first year. The implementation of a guided pathways framework will take several years, which is why the guided pathways grant has been defined with a fiveyear timeframe. The GANTT chart (located near the end of the plan) is our first attempt at defining our anticipated implementation timeline. We are primarily focusing on the Key Elements that align with the four inquiry teams previously defined. Budget Attached is our guided pathways budget that covers the current academic year costs (2017-18), next academic year s budget, and the anticipated third-year budget. March 2, 2018 Moorpark College Guided Pathways White Paper 5 P a g e

GUIIDED PATHWAYS BUDGET 2017-18; 2018-19; 2019-2020* 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20* REVENUE Guided Pathways Allocation 272,917 327,500 272,917 Total Revenue 272,917 327,500 272,917 EXPENSES Spring 2018 (planning phase) Dean Guided Pathways (50%) 61,440 0 0 Faculty - Instructional - Release Time.2 5,087 0 0 Faculty - Counselor - Release Time.2 5,087 0 0 NCII Contract 70,000 70,000 0 Subtotal Spring 2018 141,614 70,000 0 Program Mapping Faculty Lead: Mapping Release Time or Stipend (.4) 20,000 20,000 Faculty Stipends for mapping 30 programs 56,250 56,250 Subtotal Program Mapping 0 76,250 76,250 Meta-Majors Exploration Faculty Lead: Meta Majors Exploration - Release Time or Stipend (.1) 5,000 5,000 Subtotal Meta-Majors Exploration 0 5,000 5,000 Student Support Services Classified/Faculty Lead: Student Support Services - Release Time or Stipend (.1) 0 5,000 5,000 Student Success Coach #1 0 0 28,638 Student Success Coach #2 0 0 28,638 Student Success Coach #3 0 0 28,638 Subtotal Student Support Services 0 5,000 90,914 Education and Career Alignment Faculty/Classified Lead: Education and Career Alignment Release Time or Stipend (.1) - 0 5,000 5,000 Student Services Asst 2 (Dual Enrollment) 5,728 27,500 27,500 Counseling Assistant (Dual Enrollment) 5,728 27,500 27,500 Subtotal Student Support Services 11,455 60,000 60,000 March 2, 2018 Moorpark College Guided Pathways White Paper 6 P a g e

Management Support Dean of Research (20%) 0 40,959 40,959 Dean Guided Pathways (20%) 0 40,959 0 Administrative Support (16hr a week) 0 32,377 32,377 Subtotal Management Support 0 114,295 73,336 Other Supplies and Equipment 0 4,676 19,857 Conference Attendance 20,000 15,000 0 Workshops 6,000 5,000 0 Mileage 0 5,000 0 Subtotal Other 26,000 29,676 19,857 Total Expenses 179,069 360,221 325,357 REVENUE LESS EXPENSE 93,848-32,721-52,440 *2019-20 proposed budget not included in Guided Pathways Plan due March 30, 2018 March 2, 2018 Moorpark College Guided Pathways White Paper 7 P a g e

Materials and References 1 What We Know About Guided Pathways. Community College Research Center: Teachers College, Columbia University. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/what-we-know-about-guided-pathways-packet.html 2 Moorpark College s 2017 Institutional Effectiveness Report 3 Guided Pathways Key Performance Indicators: VCCCD Historical Data 4 CCCCO Data Mart: Transfer Velocity Definition: The cohorts are first-time college students with a minimum of 12 units earned who attempted a transfer level math or English course. The outcome is transfer to a four-year institution within a given time period subsequent to initial enrollment. A data match with the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), University of California (UC) and California State University (CSU) provided information on the enrollment of former CCC students at public and private four-year transfer institutions within the United States. 5 See Guided Pathways Web page for details, currently located at: http://www.moorparkcollege.edu/faculty-andstaff/professional-development/guided-pathways (NOTE: this webpage will be moved to another area on our website; if this link does not work, please use the search feature on the college s homepage to look for guided pathways. 6 What We Know About Guided Pathways. Community College Research Center: Teachers College, Columbia University. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/what-we-know-about-guided-pathways-packet.html March 2, 2018 Moorpark College Guided Pathways White Paper 8 P a g e