School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year. School Description

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Engage Educate Empower

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Shelters Elementary School

Val Verde Unified School District

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Hokulani Elementary School

Val Verde Unified School District

Kahului Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Cuero Independent School District

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

CDS Code

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

State Parental Involvement Plan

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Clark Lane Middle School

12-month Enrollment

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Local Educational Agency California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Student Data File Layout

Academic Advising and Career Exploration. PLTW State Conference 2015 Bayless School District

Antioch Charter Academy II

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Educational Attainment

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Robert Bennis Elementary School

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

University of Arizona

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Unequal Opportunity in Environmental Education: Environmental Education Programs and Funding at Contra Costa Secondary Schools.

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Conroe Independent School District

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Strategic Improvement Plan

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Campus Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan

Transcription:

---- ---- Hurd Barrington Elementary School 838 Eucalyptus Avenue Newman, CA 209 862-2585 Grades K-5 Cecilia Franco Holt, Principal cholt@nclusd.k12.ca.us www.nclusd.k12.ca.us 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card Published During the 2014-15 School Year Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District 1162 Main St. Newman, CA 95360 (209) 862-2933 www.nclusd.k12.ca.us School Description Hurd Barrington School, as a multicultural and diverse learning community, prepares each student to become successful in a career or college by providing an safe, engaging and academic learning environment for all. District Governing Board Janice Conforti President Paul Wallace RoseLee Hurst Clerk Tim Bazar Vernon Snodderly District Administration Randy Fillpot Superintendent Dave Kline Director of Human Resources Kim Bettencourt Director of Curriculum and Instruction Alice Solis Director of Student Services Caralyn Mendonca Director of Fiscal Services Matt Vargas Director of Maintenance and Operations 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Hurd Barrington Elementary School Page 1 of 7

About the SARC Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. View this SARC online at the school and/or LEA Web sites. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school at 209 862-2585. 2013-14 Student Enrollment by Grade Level Grade Level Number of Students Kinder. 72 Gr. 1-- 78 Gr. 2-- 80 Gr. 3-- 82 Gr. 4-- 78 Gr. 5-- 85 Total-- 475 2013-14 Student Enrollment by Group Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American------- 1.1 American Indian or Alaska Native--- 0.0 ---- Asian------- 0.6 Filipino------- 0.6 Hispanic or Latino------- 70.3 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0 White 24.0 Two or More Races 2.5 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 70.5 English Learners 37.5 Students with Disabilities 11.2 A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair. Teacher Credentials Hurd Barrington Elementary School 12-13 13-14 14-15 Fully Credentialed 19 Without Full Credential 1 Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence 0 Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District 12-13 13-14 14-15 Fully Credentialed 132.4 Without Full Credential 4 Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions at this School Hurd Barrington Elementary 12-13 13-14 14-15 School Teachers of English Learners 0 Total Teacher Misassignments 0 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 * Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers 2013-14 Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Location of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers This School 100.00 0.00 Districtwide All Schools 96.03 3.97 High-Poverty Schools 96.03 3.97 Low-Poverty Schools 0.00 0.00 * High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Hurd Barrington Elementary School Page 2 of 7

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2014-15) Core Curriculum Area Reading/Language Arts Mathematics Science History-Social Science Textbooks and Instructional Materials Year and month in which data were collected: August 2014 Textbooks and Instructional Materials/Year of Adoption Houghton Mifflin Reading Medallions/2010 Engage New York/August 2014 K-2 Foss Science/2007 & 3-5 Grade Houghton Mifflin California Science/2007 Reflection/Hartcourt: California Series/2006 School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year) This school was built in 2011. It is very modern and exceptionally clean. School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: 8/2014 System Inspected Repair Status Good Fair Poor Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences Overall Rating ---------- Exemplary Good Fair Poor 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Hurd Barrington Elementary School Page 3 of 7

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Pupil Achievement State Priority (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress and its successor the Standardized Testing and Reporting Program); The Academic Performance Index; and The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. Subject CAASPP Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) School District State 11-12 12-13 13-14 11-12 12-13 13-14 11-12 12-13 13-14 Science 36 33 61 50 44 46 60 59 60 * Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) assessments include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA). Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Subject STAR Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) School District State 10-11 11-12 12-13 10-11 11-12 12-13 10-11 11-12 12-13 ELA 44 47 44 47 44 54 56 55 Math 46 54 37 40 35 49 50 50 HSS 38 37 33 48 49 49 * STAR Program was last administered in 2012-13. Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Academic Performance Index Ranks - Three-Year Comparison API Rank 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Statewide------- 1 3 Similar Schools------- 1 3 * For 2014 and subsequent years, the statewide and similar schools ranks will no longer be produced. Grade Level 2013-14 Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards 4 of 6 5 of 6 6 of 6 ---5--- 19.2 34.6 20.5 * Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. 2013-14 CAASPP Results by Student Group Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) All Students in the LEA 46 All Student at the School 61 Male------- 69 Female------- 50 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian------- Filipino------- Hispanic or Latino 51 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander White------- 76 Two or More Races------- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 50 English Learners------- 30 Students with Disabilities Students Receiving Migrant Education Services * CAASPP includes science assessments (CSTs, CMA, and CAPA) in grades 5, 8, and 10. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. API Growth by Student Group Three-Year Comparison Group Actual API Change 10-11 11-12 12-13 All Students at the School B 37 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian------- Filipino------- Hispanic or Latino 54 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander White------- 5 Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 43 English Learners 47 Students with Disabilities * "N/D means that no data were available to the CDE or LEA to report. B means the school did not have a valid API Base and there is no Growth or target information. C means the school had significant demographic changes and there is no Growth or target information 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Hurd Barrington Elementary School Page 4 of 7

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement Parents are encouraged to participate in school activities and provide programs to develop a positive, supportive relationship with the school, home, and community and to facilitate a partnership to support student achievement. The school communicates to parents in the following ways: school newsletters, flyers, district calendar, phone dialer alerts, parent conferences, Back to School Night, Open House, progress reports and report cards. Opportunities for parent involvement such as: School Site Council Migrant Education/ Parent Advisory Committee Parent Institute Training or workshops offered by Family Resource Center Site Representatives on district committees Parent Workshops Adult ESL Classes Safety Committee Parent Volunteer Opportunities PTO (Parent Teacher Organization) State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety. School Safety Plan Hurd Barrington Elementary School prepares staff, students and informs parents about the comprehensive safety plan which is updated and approved annually. The safety plan is reviewed with students and staff practicing monthly fire drills, bi-yearly earthquake drills, and by-yearly lockdown drills. Suspensions and Expulsions School 11-12 12-13 13-14 Suspensions Rate Expulsions Rate District 11-12 12-13 13-14 Suspensions Rate Expulsions Rate State 11-12 12-13 13-14 Suspensions Rate Expulsions Rate * The rate of suspensions and expulsions is calculated by dividing the total number of incidents by the total enrollment x 100. 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Hurd Barrington Elementary School Page 5 of 7

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. 2013-14 Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria Made AYP Overall AYP Criteria School District Met Participation Rate: English-Language Arts Met Participation Rate: Mathematics Met Percent Proficient: English-Language Arts Met Percent Proficient: Mathematics Met API Criteria 2014-15 Federal Intervention Program Indicator School District Program Improvement Status In PI In PI First Year of Program Improvement 2013-2014 2010-2011 Year in Program Improvement Year 1 Year 3 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 5 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 83.3 * DW (determination waiver) indicates that the PI status of the school was carried over from the prior year in accordance with the flexibility granted through the federal waiver process. Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution Average Class Size Number of Classrooms* 1-20 21-32 33+ Grade 12 13 14 12 13 14 12 13 14 12 13 14 Kinder. 29.7 30 24 0 1 3 3 2 0 Gr. 1-- 28 30 26 0 3 3 3 0 Gr. 2-- 28.7 28 27 0 3 3 3 0 Gr. 3-- 27.3 21 27 0 1 4 3 3 0 Gr. 4-- 26.7 23 20 0 1 1 3 3 3 0 Gr. 5-- 24 20 21 0 1 1 4 3 3 0 * Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level. Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff at this School Number of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Academic Counselor------- 0 Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development).2 Library Media Teacher (Librarian) 1 Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) 0 Psychologist-------.2 Social Worker------- 0 Nurse-------.2 Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist.75 Resource Specialist------- 1 Other------- Average Number of Students per Staff Member Academic Counselor------- 475 * One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. FY 2012-13 Teacher and Administrative Salaries Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $42,407 $38,920 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $64,274 $59,803 Highest Teacher Salary $81,207 $78,096 Average Principal Salary (ES) $93,638 $95,836 Average Principal Salary (MS) $90,909 $99,849 Average Principal Salary (HS) $106,130 $107,599 Superintendent Salary $152,160 $151,912 Percent of District Budget Teacher Salaries 38 37 Administrative Salaries 6 6 * For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits webpage at www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. FY 2012-13 Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries Level Expenditures Per Pupil Total Restricted Unrestricted Average Teacher Salary School Site------- 1,797,528.00 604,075.00 3,497.14 63,610.20 District------- 5,002.42 $67,230 State------- $4,690 $63,037 Percent Difference: School Site/District -30.1-5.4 Percent Difference: School Site/ State -25.4 0.9 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Hurd Barrington Elementary School Page 6 of 7

Types of Services Funded at Hurd Barrington Elementary School As a Program Improvement process, Hurd Barrington School and the Newman Crows Landing Unified School district have generated a list of independent tutoring services to receive Supplementary Educational Services, that are available for under-achieving students. Families have been informed in writing of the private tutoring services that are available to assist their students. Once students have been referred to one of the independent tutoring services, their scheudule of services are coordinated by the program's director. Additionally, Hurd Barrington has a reponse to intervention program school-wide where students receive tutoring at their individual reading levels. Professional Development provided for Teachers at Hurd Barrington Elementary School Common Core implementation has prompted teachers to receive 25 days of professional development to assist teachers for the proper implementation in the areas of Mathematics, Science and English Language Arts. Technology has also been a professional staff development area in all core subjects. Teachers have also been provided the ability to have collaborative meetings within grade levels to plan and prepare with peers on best practices also giving them additional time to learn from each other as a form of continuous professional growth. 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Hurd Barrington Elementary School Page 7 of 7