Stakeholder and Public Engagement Plan Dakota County 2040 Comprehensive Plan

Similar documents
BCTV Event Calendar November 2017

City of Roseville 2040 Comprehensive Plan Scope of Services

STRENGTHENING RURAL CANADA COMMUNITY: SALMO, BRITISH COLUMBIA

Michigan State University

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

EDUCATION AND DECENTRALIZATION

FRESNO COUNTY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN UPDATE

Evaluation of the Cocoa Beach Green Business Program

SOCIAL STUDIES GRADE 1. Clear Learning Targets Office of Teaching and Learning Curriculum Division FAMILIES NOW AND LONG AGO, NEAR AND FAR

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

DU PAGE COUNTY JUDICIAL AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE FINAL SUMMARY. November 17, 2015 Regular Meeting 8:15 AM

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

Monitoring & Evaluation Tools for Community and Stakeholder Engagement

Financing Education In Minnesota

Building Extension s Public Value

Madera Unified School District. Wellness Policy Update

A. Permission. All students must have the permission of their parent or guardian to participate in any field trip.

River Rights: Whose Water Is It?

Southwood Design Proposal. Eric Berry, Carolyn Monke, & Marie Zimmerman

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Wyoming Psychological Association 2017 Fall Conference Continuing Education for Mental Health Professionals

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

Monitoring & Evaluation of Community and Stakeholder Engagement. Nombuyiselo Tshandu Wits Clinical HIV/TB Research Unit South Africa

Graduate Program in Education

Keystone Opportunity Zone

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

ONTARIO FOOD COLLABORATIVE

Practice Learning Handbook

Airplane Rescue: Social Studies. LEGO, the LEGO logo, and WEDO are trademarks of the LEGO Group The LEGO Group.

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

COMMUNICATION STRATEGY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SYSTEM OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC ACCOUNTING. Version: 14 November 2017

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

SimCity 4 Deluxe Tutorial. Future City Competition

SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING AGENDA

Vance County Summer Fun

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

Handout; Background reading: Feb. 24 Natural Gas and Mining , 471, , ; Handout Mar. 2 International Issues Handout

Project Advisory Group (PAG) Meeting # 1 Meeting Notes

ABI11111 ABIOSH Level 5 International Diploma in Environmental Sustainability Management

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

Urban Analysis Exercise: GIS, Residential Development and Service Availability in Hillsborough County, Florida

POLICE COMMISSIONER. New Rochelle, NY

Executive Summary. Curry High School

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Executive Summary. Mt. Mourne School - An IBO World School

Unequal Opportunity in Environmental Education: Environmental Education Programs and Funding at Contra Costa Secondary Schools.

United states panel on climate change. memorandum

Xenia Community Schools Board of Education Goals. Approved May 12, 2014

Supporting Youth Transition through Transportation & Mobility

Peter N. Tabbot Phone: Summary of Qualifications. Professional Experience

Virginia Principles & Practices of Real Estate for Salespersons

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

It s News to Me! Teaching with Colorado s Historic Newspaper Collection Model Lesson Format

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

Evaluation Report Output 01: Best practices analysis and exhibition

Seasonal Goal Setting Packet

NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY

Practice Learning Handbook

MARYLAND BLACK BUSINESS SUMMIT & EXPO March 24-27, 2011 presented by AATC * Black Dollar Exchange * BBH Tours

November 11, 2014 SCHOOL NAMING NEWS:

Executive Summary. Saint Paul Catholic School

D.10.7 Dissemination Conference - Conference Minutes

SETTING THE STAGE. News in Review January 2013 Teacher Resource Guide ROB FORD: Toronto s Controversial Mayor. Vocabulary Platform

Please return completed surveys to: Sara Runkel Douglas County OSU Extension Service 1134 SE Douglas Ave. Roseburg, OR 97470

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

THE VISION OF THE BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

HENG- CHIEH JAMIE WU

Conceptual Framework: Presentation

Rural Education in Oregon

university of wisconsin MILWAUKEE Master Plan Report

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

CHESTER FRITZ AUDITORIUM REPORT

JASON A. KAUFMAN, Ph.D., Ed.D.

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

Process Evaluation Power of the Wind Pilot Project

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

CRV Crew Training Theory Module Workbook. New Zealand Search and Rescue

Town of Colmar Manor

University of Central Florida Board of Trustees Finance and Facilities Committee

2016 School Performance Information

DFL School Board Bio. Claudia Swanson

EPA RESOURCE KIT: EPA RESEARCH Report Series No. 131 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN SCIENCE AND POLICY

Organization Profile


Harvesting the Wisdom of Coalitions

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Peterborough Eco Framework

Bachelor of Engineering

2014 AIA State Cross Country

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

The Teaching and Learning Center

CURRICULUM VITAE CECILE W. GARMON. Ground Floor Cravens Graduate Library 104 Fine Arts Center

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Research Naturanl Areas (RNA)

Transcription:

1. Introduction 2. Why we do Engagement 3. The DC 2040 Update Planning Process 4. Who will be engaged and how 5. Schedule 6. Attachments Introduction DC 2040 is an update to Dakota County s Comprehensive Plan, a document that guides how the community will grow and change over the next 20 years. Dakota County is required to update its Comprehensive Plan as required by the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act. Dakota County is required to update its Comprehensive Plan as per state statutes first adopted in 1976 (the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act). The Dakota County Comprehensive Plan needs to be consistent with THRIVE 2040, the regional vision and policy document adopted by the Metropolitan Council in 2014. The County's Comprehensive Plan is the overarching policy document for transportation, parks and open space, water resources, and land use. This overview outlines why stakeholder and public engagement is important to the plan, who will be engaged, how it will happen, and when it will happen. A detailed Stakeholder and Public Engagement Plan has been prepared to guide the overall engagement efforts throughout the planning process. The Plan will be a dynamic plan and be amended from time to time. As events happen, results will be documented and appended to the plan. In addition, we will learn from engagement efforts to make improvements upon future events and efforts as we navigate through the process. Why do we do engagement Public engagement is a critical aspect in ensuring that all Dakota County government services are performed efficiently, effectively and in a responsive manner. Dakota County strives to ensure that the proper level of public engagement is realized in all projects. To identify this proper level of engagement, the County utilizes a public engagement process tool that is standardized across the organization and results in consistent approaches and outcomes. The levels of engagement and what each entails in terms of description and specific examples can be seen in the table that follows. 1 P age

The DC 2040 Update will engage in all three levels throughout the course of the project. The DC 2040 Update Planning Process The DC2040 plan update process includes a series of work tasks that will occur over the next 12 to 18 months. Engagement efforts are spread over the course of the full project in three key phases: Phase 1 Inform and Listen The first engagement phase will accomplish the following key objectives: 1. to broadly communicate the plan s purpose and goals, the planning process and methodologies, and the project schedule 2 P age

2. to provide an opportunity for ALL interested parties to express opinions and ideas relative to the existing comprehensive plan vision elements and topic areas 3. to determine if and where changes to the plan are warranted 4. to coordinate planning with cities and agencies Key components of Phase 1 will include: Preparation and distribution of a scientifically valid survey to gauge county resident s opinion on key comprehensive plan topics. Establishment of a web site to disseminate information and provide a location to post and push out plan materials for community review. After the initial survey is distributed in a scientifically valid way, the same survey questions will be posted online for wider distribution. Results between the two distribution methods will be kept separate to maintain integrity of the scientifically valid survey but will be looked at in whole as part of the reporting. Facilitation of a vision summit (s) with partner communities and key agencies. Small group meetings/workshops with targeted stakeholder groups or partner communities /agencies unable to attend the summit or where follow up is needed. A public open house or intercept event to engage the general public. Phase 2 Present and Collaborate The second phase of engagement has 2 key objectives: 1. to present potential changes to the comprehensive plan based on Phase 1 input and technical analysis conducted by the consulting team and County staff 2. to collaborate with interested stakeholders in refining those changes to better adapt to expressed needs and required planning components The following represent the components of phase 2: Use the web site to disseminate information from Phase 1 and as a survey mechanism that allows participants to weigh in on potential changes to the vision, guiding principles, strategies, concepts, and ideas generated. Facilitation of a vision summit follow up to report out possible directions and changes through a focused round table dialogue with partner communities and key agencies. Follow up small group meetings/workshops with targeted stakeholder groups. A second public open house or intercept event to engage the general public. Phase 3 Report, Discuss, and Agree This phase of community engagement will include the following key objectives: 1. reporting out the draft plan 2. providing opportunities to discuss key elements 3 P age

3. to reach general consensus on plan directions. Recognizing that not every stakeholder or stakeholder group will be 100% satisfied with 100% of the content of the plan, our goal is to get as close to that as possible. The following represent the components of phase 3: Use the project web site to post draft materials and employ a simple survey mechanism to gauge public support Facilitate pop up events or intercepts with presentation materials and information on the draft plan Conduct public hearing at the County Planning Commission Who will be engaged and How A holistic public engagement process requires a diverse group represented by various populations that are involved from start to finish. A process that involves diverse stakeholders assists in achieving a project that is reflective of the County s diverse interests and ever changing population. However, in order to effectively reach and involve various stakeholders different types of specific engagement methods need to be used as their effectiveness can vary from one group to another. Major groups to engage and methods of engagement most likely to be successful are listed in the following table. Neighborhood organizations/neighborhoods (do we have a list of neighborhoods) Engagement Group Survey Vision Summit Focus Groups Open House Intercepts Pop ups General Public X X X Web Site Other Business/Econ Devel: Chamber of Commerce, Developers, Architects, Engineers, ULI, Trade/Vendors, Waste Management/Landfill Haulers or operators, Intermodal Freight Cos, Energy/Utility Cos, Rail Road Cos, Air Lake, Ag Business X X 4 P age

Engagement Group Agencies: US Army Corp. of Engineers, MNDOT, MVTA, FHWA, METRO Transit, Metro Council, MAC, School Districts, DNR, MNRRA, National Parks, US Fish and Wildlife, BWSR, Watershed Districts, MPCA, South Metro Ground Water Council, MN Geological Survey, National Research Technical Advisory, MN extension, Farm Bureau Survey Vision Summit Focus Groups Open House Intercepts Pop ups Web Site X X X Other Cities and Townships (Staff focused): Planning, Engineering, Park and Recreation, Public Works, Economic Development and Housing, Environmental, Emergency Management, Community/Senior Centers X X X Cities and Townships: Elected Officials X X1 Interest Groups: Para-Transit Providers, Ped./Bike Groups (MN Bike Alliance, Hiawatha Bike Club, ADA Groups, State council on disabilities (MSCOD), Wilderness in the City, FOM, Great River Greening, Women Observing Wildlife, Sportsman Groups, Dakota Habitat Alliance, Underrepresented Groups, Social Service Groups, Senior Housing or Services Coordinator, CLUES, Health Care Insurance Providers, YMCA, College/University, Workforce Training Centers, Art Centers/Councils, Faith Communities, American Farmers Association, SE Irrigators Associations, Food Shelves/banks, Legislators or Legislative Commissions: Elected Representatives, (State and Federal), LCCMR, Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council, CTIB, Metropolitan Council appointed member X X X X2 5 P age

Engagement Group Survey Vision Summit Focus Groups Open House Intercepts Pop ups Web Site Other 1 Provide presentation materials and updates for packet distribution. Potential presentation at Quarterly or Annual Township Meetings or City Mayors and Managers meetings. 2 Attend and present at regular meetings or coordinate one on one. Participation at legislative breakfasts and distribute press release information. 6 P age

Engagement Schedule 2017 2018 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Web Site Vision Summit Prepare Plan Update Prepare Final On line Survey Draft Follow Up Draft Plan Focus Groups Focus Pop Up Events Groups Open House Phase 1 Distribute Survey Launch Web Site Vision Summit Web Site Pop Up Events Public 2018 Q2 Q3 Q4 Phase 3 Statutory six month review and comment process Prepare Final Plan Conduct Formal Public Hearing and Adoption process February: March: May: June: The project website went live in February. Information is being updated on a periodic basis as events happen. www.hkgi.com/projects/dakotacocompplan/ A scientifically valid survey was prepared with assistance from the University of Minnesota and distributed 800 households in the County. The Survey was mailed and data collected between March 14 and May 8, 2007. The findings of that survey are currently being compiled and will be posted when complete. A series of vision summit meetings were held in May 2017 with municipal staff to coordinate comprehensive planning efforts, discuss trends and background information, and discuss emerging policy and project topics important to each community. These meetings were attended by representatives from Eagan, Burnsville, Apple Valley, Hastings, Farmington, Lakeville, Mendota Heights, Sunfish Lake, Inver Grove Heights, Northfield, Rosemount, West St. Paul, and Vermillion. Invitations were sent to all municipalities in Dakota County. Invitations were also sent to the planning consultant leading the County Collaborative and to Townships not part of the collaborative. Presentation materials from these meetings can be found on the project web site or by clicking here. Notes are being compiled and will be posted when complete. The survey mechanism was posted on line June 9, 2017 for broader distribution. To access that survey visit the web site or click here. 7 P age

Upcoming Events June/July/August: Upcoming events and meetings include the following: Vision summit meetings with key regional agencies June 15 th. Pop/intercept/open house event TBD: general information about the comprehensive plan update and opportunity to offer input on vision, issues, and opportunities (i.e. what is the scope of updates to the Comprehensive Plan.) This will be open to all members of the public. Focus group meetings: Focus group meetings will be offered to interested parties and will afford the opportunity to learn about the comprehensive plan topics, to hear about emerging trends and patterns, and to share with the project team specific areas of interest including issues, opportunities, and desired updates to the plan. The project will use this information to help define the scope of the updates to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Meetings will be made on an invitation basis. Invitations will be extend to all interested stakeholder groups. To the extent appropriate, we will group stakeholder with common interests together. * End of Plan Document 8 P age