Progress Report. For. Closing the Achievement Gap. Professional Development Demonstration Schools

Similar documents
Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

21st Century Community Learning Centers

Cooper Upper Elementary School

State of New Jersey

Two-thirds of APS Schools Increase on State CCRPI Scores

Bellehaven Elementary

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

THE VISION OF THE BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

World s Best Workforce Plan

Pyramid. of Interventions

African American Male Achievement Update

Accuplacer Implementation Report Submitted by: Randy Brown, Ph.D. Director Office of Institutional Research Gavilan College May 2012

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

New Hanover County Schools Announce the Results for the READY Assessments and Report the Highest Graduation Rate to Date

Program budget Budget FY 2013

KANSAS SCHOOL FIRE DRILL LOG

Price Sensitivity Analysis

Curriculum and Assessment Guide (CAG) Elementary California Treasures First Grade

FROM CHEMISTRY TO PERSONAL GROWTH MY FULBRIGHT JOURNEY IN TUNISIA

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

TRANSFER ARTICULATION AGREEMENT between DOMINICAN COLLEGE and BERGEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Cooper Upper Elementary School

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

Shelters Elementary School

Measures of the Location of the Data

Cuero Independent School District

Tuesday 13 May 2014 Afternoon

Review of Student Assessment Data

The College of New Jersey Department of Chemistry. Overview- 2009

4.0 CAPACITY AND UTILIZATION

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Rural Education in Oregon

Mercer County Schools

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

100 Tier 2 Words For High School

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Introduction to the Practice of Statistics

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

INTERNAL MEDICINE IN-TRAINING EXAMINATION (IM-ITE SM )

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

Strategic Improvement Plan

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

Business Tech Prep Summit

Enhancing Learning with a Poster Session in Engineering Economy

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Allendale Hillside Elementary School Brookside Elementary School Special School District/Technical Schools Woodridge Saddlebrook 3

A Retrospective Study

Developing a College-level Speed and Accuracy Test

Entry Plan for the First 100 Days for Tari N. Thomas. Interim Superintendent of Schools Orange, Petersham and RC Mahar Regional

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

ADDIE: A systematic methodology for instructional design that includes five phases: Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation.

Program Units. Helmondollar, Ronnie Room G203 Agricultural Sciences Bldg Program Director Agriculture and Natural Resources

Charter School Performance Comparable to Other Public Schools; Stronger Accountability Needed

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Math & Science Collaborative. Math & Science Collaborative Spring/Summer

School Performance Plan Middle/High Schools

GERMAN STUDIES (GRMN)

Loudoun Scholarship Application

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

Math 098 Intermediate Algebra Spring 2018

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Georgia Department of Education

Progress Monitoring & Response to Intervention in an Outcome Driven Model

UNIT ONE Tools of Algebra

Service-Learning Projects in a Public Health in Pharmacy Course 1

ONTARIO FOOD COLLABORATIVE

SOUTHERN CONFERENCE 2016 Rules of Competition

TOPIC: Biennial Exempt Market Salary Survey Report and FY Structures Adjustment

JUNIOR HIGH ATHLETICS

ASCD Recommendations for the Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind

Audit Of Teaching Assignments. An Integrated Analysis of Teacher Educational Background and Courses Taught October 2007

Bittinger, M. L., Ellenbogen, D. J., & Johnson, B. L. (2012). Prealgebra (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Technology in the Classroom: The Impact of Teacher s Technology Use and Constructivism

Welcome! On Zoom you can use VOIP or Call in

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Jefferson County School District Testing Plan

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

Volunteer State Community College Budget and Planning Priorities

Transcription:

Progress Report For Closing the Achievement Gap Professional Development Demonstration Schools -

Cumulative Report - Executive Summary The large percentages of high need students in the Closing the Achievement Gap Professional Development Demonstration Schools are a challenge to improving student learning and achievement. Closing the Achievement Gap (CAG) Liaisons are provided to work in the Professional Development Demonstration Schools to help overcome this challenge. The CAG Liaisons use a set of research based standards to accomplish their work. Data is being collected to measure improvement in quality school practices, student achievement and learning, and the reduction in the achievement gap between all students and each of the three high needs subgroups of students. There are measurable gains in quality school practices, an example is growth in amount and quality of time available for teacher leadership teams to collaborate. There are measurable gains in the percent of students proficient in learning the West Virginia Curriculum Standards and Objectives (WVCSOs) for reading and math in every subgroup. There is a reduction in the gap of percent of students proficient, for both reading and math, between the all student group and each of the high needs subgroups. 1

Cumulative Report - Progress Report Closing the Achievement Gap Professional Development Demonstration Schools The Closing the Achievement Gap Professional Development Demonstration Schools (CAG Schools) were instituted with the passage of HB 4669 in March of. The purpose of the CAG schools program is to improve the academic achievement of all children. The schools selected for the program were to have high percentages of poor, minority and underachieving students. The chart on the bottom of this page shows the percentages of black, needy, and special education children as an aggregate in the CAG schools. Significant percentages of each group exist in the schools. These traditionally underperforming groups present a challenge which the program is overcoming. In order to meet this challenge the program provides a Closing the Achievement Gap Liaison that works in three schools in each county. Page two shows the standards under which the Liaisons operate as they serve schools. Under each standard are broad areas of assistance that the Liaisons provide to their assigned schools. An example of this assistance is in the area of helping schools understand the need to schedule time for collaborative team meetings. The chart on page 3 indicates the improvement from to in the time available for collaboration in the CAG schools. The work the Liaisons do in CAG schools has led to gains in the percentage of all students and black, special education and needy students proficient in reading and math. The bar graphs on pages 4 through 7 indicate these gains. The most important data presented here indicates that the gap is being closed between the performance of black, special education and needy students as compared to all students in both reading and math. Each of the three subgroups has a smaller gap in performance in both reading and math than when the program started in. The closing of the gap is represented by line graphs on pages 8 through 10. The spreadsheets on pages 11 through 14 show the performance for each CAG school. Composite High Needs Population Percentages in Closing the Achievement Gap Schools 17% 23% Black Enrollment Needy Enrollment 60% Special Needs Enrollment 2

Cumulative Report - STANDARDS FOR CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP LIAISONS STANDARD 1: BRINGING FOCUS A. Professional development and assistance in writing and reviewing Strategic 5-year Plans B. Development of leadership teams in schools C. Assistance with using data as the basis for school and classroom decision making STANDARD 2: LEADING CHANGE A. Creation of professional learning communities B. Collaboration with Instructional Coaches/Demonstration teachers to model and teach 21 st Century learning and instructional strategies C. Creation of cooperative planning protocols to maintain focus on student learning STANDARD 3: DEVELOPING ACCOUNTABILITY A. Assistance with the use of formative and benchmarking assessments for student learning B. Facilitating cooperative planning as a vehicle for improving instruction C. Working with administrators and teachers on using data for program and instructional evaluation STANDARD 4: BUILDING CAPACITY A. Work with staff to understand and implement standards based curriculum and instruction that is driven by data B. Professional development for principals and staff on 21 st Century teaching and learning C. Facilitating the habit of reflective practice by school staff D. Supporting conditions in which schools can close the achievement gap STANDARD 5: CREATING COMMUNITY A. Facilitating cooperative planning B. Book studies on culture and community C. Working cooperatively with local colleges/universities and the West Virginia Achievement Project STANDARD 6: GROWING PROFESSIONALLY A. Participation in year-long professional development as a foundation for school improvement B. Engaging in on-going reading and research on topics appropriate to our schools C. Professional development on 21 st Century learning 3

Cumulative Report - Closing the Achievement Gap (CAG) Professional Development Demonstration Schools Program - HB 4669 - -2007 Collaboration Improvement in Availability and Quality of Collaborative Time for Teachers No time alloted for collaboration or teaming. Collaboration is not a priority. Teachers volunteer time beyond work day/year to collaborate. Use of stipends or supplemental contracts for teachers to collaborate beyond normal working hours Collaborative time provided outside of the classroom during the school day (e.g. substitutes, itenerate teachers). Collaborative teaming time embedded in the school day with structures in place to support continuous professional learning. Number of Schools at each level in Number of Schools at each level in 13 10 3 4 0 0 0 5 13 12 4

Cumulative Report - All Subgroup Reading Composite Gains for CAG Schools Through 78.00% 77.00% 76.00% 75.00% 74.00% 74.51% 75.39% 77.18% All Subgroup Reading 73.00% Total 2.67% Gain in Reading for All Students All Subgroup Math Composite Gains for CAG Schools Through 72.00% 68.00% 66.00% 64.00% 62.00% 58.00% 56.00% 70.02% 66.99% 61.59% All Subgroup Math Total 8.43% Gain in Math for All Students 5

Cumulative Report - Black Subgroup Reading Composite Gains for CAG Schools Through 72.00% 68.00% 66.00% 64.00% 62.00% 63.30% 70.02% 70.02% Black Subgroup Reading 58.00% 1 2 3 Total 6.9% Gain in Reading for Black Students Black Subgroup Math Composite Gains for CAG Schools Through 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 46.56% 53.96% 58.41% Black Subgroup Math 0.00% Total 11.85% Gain in Math for Black Students 6

Cumulative Report - Special Education Subgroup Reading Composite Gains for CAG Schools Through 36.00% 35.35% 34.00% 32.00% 30.00% 28.00% 30.23% 32.71% Special Education Subgroup Reading 26.00% Total 5.14% Gain in Reading for Special Education Students Special Education Subgroup Math Composite Gains for CAG Schools Through 40.00% 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 33.44% 29.60% 23.10% Special Education Subgroup Math Total 10.39% Gain in Math for Special Education Students 7

Cumulative Report - Needy Subgroup Reading Composite Gains for CAG Schools Through 72.00% 71.00% 69.00% 68.00% 67.00% 66.00% 65.00% 64.00% 70.81% 66.84% 67.37% Needy Subgroup Reading Total 3.97% Gain in Reading for Needy Students Needy Subgroup Math Composite Gains for CAG Schools Through 72.00% 68.00% 66.00% 64.00% 62.00% 58.00% 56.00% 69.98% 66.94% 61.50% Needy Subgroup Math Total 8.48% Gain in Math for Needy Students 8

Cumulative Report - Closing the Reading Gap Between Black And All Students - 100.00% 80.00% 40.00% 20.00% 74.51% 75.39% 77.18% 70.02% 70.02% 63.30% All Subgroup Reading Black Subgroup Reading 0.00% The gap between Black and All Students in reading was closed by 4.05% Closing the Math Gap Between Black and All Students - 80.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 66.99% 70.02% 61.59% 58.41% 53.96% 46.56% All Subgroup Math Black Subgroup Math The gap between Black and All Students in math was closed by 3.42% 9

Cumulative Report - Closing the Reading Gap Between Special Education and All Students - 100.00% 80.00% 40.00% 20.00% 74.51% 75.39% 77.18% 30.23% 32.71% 35.35% All Subgroup Reading Special Education Subgroup Reading 0.00% The gap between Special Education and All Students in reading was closed by 2.45% Closing the Math Gap Between Special Education and All Students - 80.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 61.59% 23.10% 66.99% 70.02% 29.60% 33.44% All Subgroup Math Special Education Subgroup Math The gap between Special Education and All Students in math was closed by 1.91% 10

Cumulative Report - Closing the Reading Gap Between Needy and All Students - nt Proficient Perce 80.00% 75.00% 65.00% 74.51% 75.39% 66.84% 67.37% 77.18% 70.81% All Subgroup Reading Needy Subgroup Reading The gap between Needy and All Students in reading was closed by 1.3% Closing the Math Gap Between Needy and All Students - 72.00% 68.00% 66.00% 64.00% 62.00% 58.00% 56.00% 70.02% 66.99% 69.98% 61.59% 66.94% 61.50% All Subgroup Math Needy Subgroup Math The gap between Needy and All Students in math was closed by.05% 11

Cumulative Report - Closing the Achievement Gap (CAG) Professional Development Demonstration Schools Program - HB 4669 - -2007 All Subgroup - Reading All Subgroup - Math County School Gain - School Gain - Fayette Collins Middle 76.68 557 74.89 544 77.54 563 0.86 Collins Middle 61.44 446 68.13 495 72.45 526 11.01 Mount Hope High 69.82 180 72.99 188 68.6 177-1.22 Mount Hope High 54.97 141 57.8 149 49.02 126-5.95 Valley High 72.54 241 57.44 191 74.39 247 1.85 Valley High 48.07 160 31.91 106 59.63 198 11.56 Mercer Bluefield Intermediate 69.18 221 75.89 242 76.8 245 7.62 Bluefield Intermediate 66.27 211 72.91 233 72.72 232 6.45 Bluefield Middle 76.8 435 78.98 447 78.97 447 2.17 Bluefield Middle 56.21 316 65.94 371 66.07 372 9.86 Lashmeet/Matoaka 72.79 194 79.48 212 82.77 221 9.98 Lashmeet/Matoaka 66.07 176 72.89 195 78.27 209 12.2 Ohio Madison Elementary 72.78 93 74.46 95 85.93 110 13.15 Madison Elementary 75.51 97 76.59 98 90.62 116 15.11 Ritchie Elementary 72.3 92 75.75 96 78.74 100 6.44 Ritchie Elementary 76.92 98 80.3 102 85.03 108 8.11 Wheeling Middle 74.03 165 82.15 183 78.92 176 4.89 Wheeling Middle 65.38 146 77.93 174 78.47 175 13.09 Kanawha Chandler Elementary 38.55 26 45.94 31 76.47 52 37.92 Chandler Elementary 39.28 27 51.35 35 73.91 51 34.63 Glenwood Elementary 52.74 49 58.88 54 59.78 55 7.04 Glenwood Elementary 36.26 33 43.33 40 41.3 38 5.04 Stonewall Jackson Middle 69.18 374 72.56 392 73.7 398 4.52 Stonewall Jackson Middle 50 272 58.05 315 58.93 320 8.93 Raleigh Beckley Elementary ** 63.28 81 62.58 90 69.44 100 6.16 Beckley Elementary ** 76.56 110 74.82 108 77.08 111 0.52 Stratton Elementary 61.53 55 62.62 56 67.77 61 6.24 Stratton Elementary 79.12 71 69.69 63 75.55 68-3.57 Beckley-Stratton Middle 77.32 552 77.19 551 80.11 572 2.79 Beckley-Stratton Middle 67.38 482 71.3 510 73.42 525 6.04 Marion East Dale Elementary 83.38 263 84.09 266 80.06 253-3.32 East Dale Elementary 79.47 251 80.51 254 80.37 254 0.9 Watson Elementary 79.02 91 76.47 88 86.08 99 7.06 Watson Elementary 69.23 80 67.32 77 81.73 94 12.5 Dunbar Middle School 80.37 226 75.26 211 78.29 220-2.08 Dunbar Middle School 70.09 196 73.88 207 77.5 217 7.41 Miller Junior High School 85.79 290 86.7 293 86.09 291 0.3 Miller Junior High School 73.19 247 77.87 262 77.44 261 4.25 Berkeley Eagle Intermediate 68.56 311 76.32 346 78.36 355 9.8 Eagle Intermediate 59.65 270 71.49 324 73.5 333 13.85 Martinsburg North Middle 77.22 424 76.05 418 74.86 411-2.36 Martinsburg North Middle 57.09 308 63.8 345 60 324 2.91 Martinsburg South Middle 79.55 667 81.37 683 81.16 681 1.61 Martinsburg South Middle 60.94 514 72.28 609 72.95 615 12.01 Cabell Cammack Middle 83.97 313 85 317 83.1 310-0.87 Cammack Middle 69.14 258 78.07 291 78.01 291 8.87 Enslow Middle 74.38 200 74.14 199 69.51 187-4.87 Enslow Middle 58.74 159 61.77 167 59.25 160 0.51 West Middle 78.11 163 73.75 154 74.16 155-3.95 West Middle 55.98 117 61.99 130 66.5 139 10.52 Peyton Elementary 70.21 52 68.23 50 72.97 54 2.76 Peyton Elementary 56.38 42 53.48 40 63.51 47 7.13 Spring Hill Elementary 67.68 143 68.44 144 68.24 144 0.56 Spring Hill Elementary 56.76 120 61.16 129 58.76 124 2 McDowell Fall River Elementary 57.14 37 59.81 38 65.62 42 8.48 Fall River Elementary 53.33 34 70.09 45 73.43 47 20.1 Mount View Middle 63.63 235 54.94 203 60.43 223-3.2 Mount View Middle 40.08 148 44.48 164 59.34 219 19.26 Sandy River Middle 75.92 244 68.24 219 72.27 232-3.65 Sandy River Middle 48.72 156 58.16 187 61.68 198 12.96 Mount View High 52.89 62 69.85 82 76.06 89 23.17 Mount View High 42.14 49 51.47 60 54.7 64 12.56 Jefferson North Jefferson Elementary 70.46 102 72.18 105 70.34 102-0.12 North Jefferson Elementary 70.46 102 72.84 106 71.72 104 1.26 Wright Denny Elementary 79.78 308 83.37 322 87.3 337 7.52 Wright Denny Elementary 75.47 291 77.41 299 81.08 313 5.61 Charles Town Middle 77.23 668 80.62 697 80.34 695 3.11 Charles Town Middle 66.43 574 69.75 603 74.18 641 7.75 TOTALS 8113 8209 8403 6703 7290 7619 COMPOSITE PERCENTAGES 74.51% 75.39% 77.18% 2.67% 61.59% 66.99% 70.02% 8.43% 12

Cumulative Report - Closing the Achievement Gap (CAG) Professional Development Model Schools Program - HB 4669 Report March 2007 Black Subgroup - Reading Black Subgroup - Math County School Gain - Fayette Collins Middle 68.75 41 65.75 39 68.33 41 2.58 Collins Middle 50 30 52.05 31 66.66 40 16.66 Mount Hope High 65.21 33 68.75 34 54 27-11.21 Mount Hope High 43.47 21 41.66 20 30.61 15-11.05 Valley High 40 10 58.33 15 69.23 18 29.23 Valley High 20 5 25 7 69.23 18 49.23 Mercer Bluefield Intermediate 60.34 67 65.57 73 72.97 81 12.63 Bluefield Intermediate 54.31 60 62.29 69 57.65 64 3.34 Bluefield Middle 60.46 83 65.15 89 69.34 95 8.88 Bluefield Middle 32.55 44 45.8 61 49.25 66 16.7 Lashmeet/Matoaka NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Lashmeet/Matoaka NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio Madison Elementary 70.58 24 74.28 25 88.23 30 17.65 Madison Elementary 76.47 26 68.57 23 94.11 32 17.64 Ritchie Elementary 81.25 16 79.16 16 80 16-1.25 Ritchie Elementary 81.25 16 75 15 80 16-1.25 Wheeling Middle 64 18 80.64 23 85.71 24 21.71 Wheeling Middle 48 13 70.96 20 71.42 20 23.42 Kanawha Chandler Elementary 29.62 11 40 15 78.37 29 48.75 Chandler Elementary 37.03 14 51.11 19 70.27 26 33.24 Glenwood Elementary 51.38 40 54.66 43 56.41 44 5.03 Glenwood Elementary 37.5 29 41.33 32 41.02 32 3.52 Stonewall Jackson Middle 55.46 124 68.55 153 65.91 147 10.45 Stonewall Jackson Middle 35.56 80 47.16 107 47.34 107 11.78 Raleigh Beckley Elementary ** 59.34 51 61.7 53 68.6 59 9.26 Beckley Elementary ** 69.23 60 73.4 63 74.41 64 5.18 Stratton Elementary 62.9 36 62.68 36 75.43 43 12.53 Stratton Elementary 77.41 44 74.62 43 80.7 46 3.29 Beckley-Stratton Middle 64 117 66.87 122 71.03 130 7.03 Beckley-Stratton Middle 49.42 90 57.05 104 59.56 109 10.14 Marion East Dale Elementary 66.66 7 100 11 81.81 9 15.15 East Dale Elementary 66.66 7 100 11 81.81 9 15.15 Watson Elementary 73.91 27 66.66 24 91.66 33 17.75 Watson Elementary 65.21 23 56.25 20 80.55 29 15.34 Dunbar Middle School 74.07 42 61.36 35 70.17 40-3.9 Dunbar Middle School 40.74 23 52.27 30 71.92 41 31.18 Miller Junior High School 72.88 38 83.92 44 80.76 42 7.88 Miller Junior High School 54.23 28 58.92 31 55.76 29 1.53 Berkeley Eagle Intermediate 61.44 73 70.75 84 73.1 87 11.66 Eagle Intermediate 51.8 62 55.66 66 68.06 81 16.26 Martinsburg North Middle 66.39 96 67.42 97 69.44 100 3.05 Martinsburg North Middle 39.34 56 50.75 72 50 71 10.66 Martinsburg South Middle 74.74 105 73.45 103 69.28 97-5.46 Martinsburg South Middle 42.42 59 50.87 71 57.14 80 14.72 Cabell Cammack Middle 67.07 74 75.51 84 74.77 83 7.7 Cammack Middle 39.02 43 60.6 67 63.06 70 24.04 Enslow Middle 61.29 20 59.37 20 57.57 19-3.72 Enslow Middle 26.66 9 43.75 14 42.42 14 15.76 West Middle 78.57 9 73.33 8 81.81 9 3.24 West Middle 57.14 6 66.66 7 63.63 7 6.49 Peyton Elementary 64.28 14 62.96 14 63.63 14-0.65 Peyton Elementary 50 11 59.25 13 50 11 0 Spring Hill Elementary 63.54 64 63.73 64 70 70 6.46 Spring Hill Elementary 52.08 52 56.04 56 60 60 7.92 McDowell Fall River Elementary NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Fall River Elementary NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Mount View Middle 65.67 58 42.85 38 53.4 47-12.27 Mount View Middle 34.32 30 36.5 32 45.45 40 11.13 Sandy River Middle NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Sandy River Middle NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Mount View High 44.44 16 58.97 21 65.71 23 21.27 Mount View High 30.55 11 38.46 13 40 14 9.45 Jefferson North Jefferson Elementary 82.35 13 61.11 10 68.75 11-13.6 North Jefferson Elementary 88.23 14 61.11 10 62.5 10 1.39 Wright Denny Elementary 55.1 33 67.85 41 75 45 19.9 Wright Denny Elementary 53.06 32 57.14 34 63.33 38 10.27 Charles Town Middle 72.65 90 71.66 89 75.8 94 3.15 Charles Town Middle 51.18 64 56.3 70 61.6 77 10.42 TOTALS 1449 1521 1607 1065 1234 1336 COMPOSITE PERCENTAGES 63.30% 66.43% 70.20% 6.90% 46.56% 53.96% 58.41% 11.85% School Gain - 13

Cumulative Report - Closing the Achievement Gap (CAG) Professional Development Model Schools Program - HB 4669 Report March 2007 Special Ed Subgroup Reading Special Ed Subgroup Math County School Gain - Fayette Collins Middle 31.68 18 28.04 16 36.84 21 5.16 Collins Middle 24.75 14 25.6 15 26.31 15 1.56 Mount Hope High 10.34 5 21.05 10 22.44 11 12.1 Mount Hope High 3.44 2 10.52 5 12.5 6 9.06 Valley High 60 25 0 0 42.85 18-17.15 Valley High 40 17 0 0 28.57 12-11.43 Mercer Bluefield Intermediate 25.67 16 41.17 25 37.7 23 12.03 Bluefield Intermediate 36.48 22 54.41 33 52.45 32 15.97 Bluefield Middle 26.66 27 27.61 28 33.98 35 7.32 Bluefield Middle 17.21 18 24.03 25 22.11 23 4.9 Lashmeet/Matoaka 20.51 6 41.46 12 27.58 8 7.07 Lashmeet/Matoaka 28.2 8 34.14 10 31.03 9 2.83 Ohio Madison Elementary 41.02 11 45.16 13 67.85 19 26.83 Madison Elementary 38.46 11 54.83 15 78.57 22 40.11 Ritchie Elementary 44.82 12 50 13 38.46 10-6.36 Ritchie Elementary 62.06 16 61.76 16 65.38 17 3.32 Wheeling Middle 20 5 25.8 7 22.22 6 2.22 Wheeling Middle 22.85 6 41.93 11 29.62 8 6.77 Kanawha Chandler Elementary 6.89 2 28.57 7 47.82 11 40.93 Chandler Elementary 20.68 5 35.71 8 52.17 12 31.49 Glenwood Elementary 17.39 3 27.27 5 22.22 4 4.83 Glenwood Elementary 17.39 3 13.63 2 33.33 6 15.94 Stonewall Jackson Middle 19.44 19 32.65 33 42 42 22.56 Stonewall Jackson Middle 13.88 14 20.2 20 25.51 25 11.63 Raleigh Beckley Elementary ** 35 6 27.27 5 23.52 4-11.48 Beckley Elementary ** 65 11 50 9 52.94 9-12.06 Stratton Elementary 30 8 34.61 9 34.61 9 4.61 Stratton Elementary 50 13 53.84 14 46.15 12-3.85 Beckley-Stratton Middle 27.92 28 23.52 23 25.25 25-2.67 Beckley-Stratton Middle 19.44 19 32.67 32 35.35 35 15.91 Marion East Dale Elementary 28.57 10 31.42 11 22.22 8-6.35 East Dale Elementary 31.42 11 34.28 12 38.88 14 7.46 Watson Elementary 42.3 5 32 4 63.63 7 21.33 Watson Elementary 53.84 6 32 4 72.72 8 18.88 Dunbar Middle School 29.16 10 13.15 4 27.27 9-1.89 Dunbar Middle School 25 8 17.5 6 39.39 13 14.39 Miller Junior High School 35.41 18 55.31 28 49.01 25 13.6 Miller Junior High School 12.5 6 35.41 18 34 17 21.5 Berkeley Eagle Intermediate 35.84 36 47.61 48 50 50 14.16 Eagle Intermediate 26.41 26 55.23 55 55 55 28.59 Martinsburg North Middle 30.98 39 33.81 43 34.64 44 3.66 Martinsburg North Middle 16.9 20 18.57 22 22.68 27 5.78 Martinsburg South Middle 30.98 39 33.81 43 34.64 44 3.66 Martinsburg South Middle 21.55 31 35.2 50 36.36 52 14.81 Cabell Cammack Middle 33.96 13 41.46 16 38.46 15 4.5 Cammack Middle 18.86 8 33.33 13 27.5 11 8.64 Enslow Middle 37.7 18 32.75 16 28.57 14-4.18 Enslow Middle 14.75 7 21.05 10 12.24 6-2.51 West Middle 32.55 14 19.44 8 30.23 13 10.79 West Middle 11.62 5 16.66 7 18.6 8 6.98 Peyton Elementary 50 5 26.31 3 40 4 13.69 Peyton Elementary 50 5 42.1 4 40 4-10 Spring Hill Elementary 47.27 21 39.62 18 42.22 19 2.6 Spring Hill Elementary 40 18 47.16 21 44.44 20 4.44 McDowell Fall River Elementary NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Fall River Elementary NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Mount View Middle 21.21 22 17.8 19 25.96 27 4.75 Mount View Middle 6.06 6 10.95 11 20.95 22 14.89 Sandy River Middle 37.5 21 27.86 16 26.78 15-10.72 Sandy River Middle 22.22 12 22.95 13 30.35 17 8.13 Mount View High 10 2 44.44 10 40.9 9 30.9 Mount View High 13.33 3 33.33 7 22.72 5 9.39 Jefferson North Jefferson Elementary 45.71 16 44.82 15 41.17 14-4.54 North Jefferson Elementary 48.57 17 37.93 13 50 17 1.43 Wright Denny Elementary 44.44 21 37.5 18 38.29 18-6.15 Wright Denny Elementary 39.68 19 35.41 17 42.55 20 2.87 Charles Town Middle 27.04 37 43.2 60 36.23 50 9.19 Charles Town Middle 19.16 26 21.77 30 29.19 40 10.03 TOTALS 540 584 631 414 530 599 COMPOSITE PERCENTAGES 30.37% 32.85% 35.51% 5.14% 23.20% 29.73% 33.59% 10.39% School # proficient Gain - 14

Cumulative Report - Closing the Achievement Gap (CAG) Professional Development Model Schools Program - HB 4669 Report March 2007 Needy Subgroup - Reading Needy Subgroup - Math County School Gain - Fayette Collins Middle 71.86 329 69.29 317 74.01 339 2.15 Collins Middle 61.44 446 68.13 495 72.45 526 11.01 Mount Hope High 65.85 142 68.98 148 66.04 142 0.19 Mount Hope High 54.97 141 57.8 149 49.02 126-5.95 Valley High 72 150 44 92 67.3 140-4.7 Valley High 48.07 160 31.91 106 59.63 198 11.56 Mercer Bluefield Intermediate 60.31 140 69.1 160 70.25 163 9.94 Bluefield Intermediate 66.27 211 72.91 233 72.72 232 6.45 Bluefield Middle 68.99 271 71.65 282 73.28 288 4.29 Bluefield Middle 56.21 316 65.94 371 66.07 372 9.86 Lashmeet/Matoaka 69.8 142 79.1 161 81.77 166 11.97 Lashmeet/Matoaka 66.07 176 72.89 195 78.27 209 12.20 Ohio Madison Elementary 68.85 68 73.68 73 84.84 84 15.99 Madison Elementary 75.51 97 76.59 98 90.62 116 15.11 Ritchie Elementary 70.75 75 77.06 82 78.3 83 7.55 Ritchie Elementary 76.92 98 80.3 102 85.03 108 8.11 Wheeling Middle 65.25 89 76 103 73.52 100 8.27 Wheeling Middle 65.38 146 77.93 174 78.47 175 13.09 Kanawha Chandler Elementary 39.72 25 47.22 30 78.12 50 38.4 Chandler Elementary 39.28 27 51.35 35 73.91 51 34.63 Glenwood Elementary 50 36 56.25 40 56.33 40 6.33 Glenwood Elementary 36.26 33 43.33 40 41.3 38 5.04 Stonewall Jackson Middle 63.3 240 69.45 263 70.97 269 7.67 Stonewall Jackson Middle 50 272 58.05 315 58.93 320 8.93 Raleigh Beckley Elementary ** 63.33 77 58.4 71 65.28 79 1.95 Beckley Elementary ** 71.41 86 71.68 87 75.2 91 3.79 Stratton Elementary 57.69 44 62.06 47 69.73 53 12.04 Stratton Elementary 79.12 71 69.69 63 75.55 68-3.57 Beckley-Stratton Middle 67.04 288 67.51 290 71.56 307 4.52 Beckley-Stratton Middle 67.38 482 71.3 510 73.42 525 6.04 Marion East Dale Elementary 78.01 112 76.86 111 72.22 104-5.79 East Dale Elementary 79.47 251 80.51 254 80.37 254 0.90 Watson Elementary 71.42 46 68.31 44 81.53 53 10.11 Watson Elementary 69.23 80 67.32 77 81.73 94 12.50 Dunbar Middle School 68.75 96 64.4 90 67.85 95-0.9 Dunbar Middle School 70.09 196 73.88 207 77.5 217 7.41 Miller Junior High School 75.17 98 76.59 100 73.84 96-1.33 Miller Junior High School 73.19 247 77.87 262 77.44 261 4.25 Berkeley Eagle Intermediate 60.25 160 69.75 185 71.32 189 11.07 Eagle Intermediate 59.65 270 71.49 324 73.5 333 13.85 Martinsburg North Middle 70.56 224 66.87 213 71.69 228 1.13 Martinsburg North Middle 57.09 308 63.8 345 60 324 2.91 Martinsburg South Middle 69.74 264 71.72 272 70.97 269 1.23 Martinsburg South Middle 60.94 514 72.28 609 72.95 615 12.01 Cabell Cammack Middle 67.54 118 70.86 123 72.41 126 4.87 Cammack Middle 69.14 258 78.07 291 78.01 291 8.87 Enslow Middle 71.79 159 72.06 159 66.51 147-5.28 Enslow Middle 58.74 159 61.77 167 59.25 160 0.51 West Middle 77.72 148 72.77 138 73.15 139-4.57 West Middle 55.98 117 61.99 130 66.5 139 10.52 Peyton Elementary 64.55 41 65.27 41 69.84 44 5.29 Peyton Elementary 56.38 42 53.48 40 63.51 47 7.13 Spring Hill Elementary 65.12 122 67.03 125 65.77 123 0.65 Spring Hill Elementary 56.76 120 61.16 129 58.76 124 2.00 McDowell Fall River Elementary 56.38 32 58.58 33 64.28 36 7.9 Fall River Elementary 53.33 34 70.09 45 73.43 47 20.10 Mount View Middle 59.7 192 52.15 167 58.25 187-1.45 Mount View Middle 40.08 148 44.48 164 59.34 219 19.26 Sandy River Middle 73.72 203 64.31 177 69.92 193-3.8 Sandy River Middle 48.72 156 58.16 187 61.68 198 12.96 Mount View High 47.25 41 64.22 56 73.56 64 26.31 Mount View High 42.14 49 51.47 60 54.7 64 12.56 Jefferson North Jefferson Elementary 60 48 62.92 50 65 52 5 North Jefferson Elementary 70.46 102 72.84 106 71.72 104 1.26 Wright Denny Elementary 56.14 60 62.39 67 78.5 84 22.36 Wright Denny Elementary 75.47 291 77.41 299 81.08 313 5.61 Charles Town Middle 65.33 184 66.02 186 69.03 194 3.7 Charles Town Middle 66.43 574 69.75 603 74.18 641 7.75 TOTALS 4461 4496 4726 6679 7269 7599 COMPOSITE PERCENTAGES 66.84% 67.37% 70.81% 3.97% 61.50% 66.94% 69.98% 8.48% School # proficient Gain - 15