Dropout Rates. Headline

Similar documents
Updated: December Educational Attainment

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

46 Children s Defense Fund

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Educational Attainment

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Shelters Elementary School

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Chapter Six The Non-Monetary Benefits of Higher Education

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

LOW-INCOME EMPLOYEES IN THE UNITED STATES

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

Transportation Equity Analysis

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

High School Equivalency Diploma Task Force Report & Recommendation

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

2/3 9.8% 38% $0.78. The Status of Women in Missouri: 2016 ARE WOMEN 51% 22% A Comprehensive Report of Leading Indicators and Findings.

The Value of English Proficiency to the. By Amber Schwartz and Don Soifer December 2012

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

National Academies STEM Workforce Summit

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

12-month Enrollment

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

WIOA II/AEBG Data Dictionary

Creating Collaborative Partnerships: The Success Stories and Challenges

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Why Graduate School? Deborah M. Figart, Ph.D., Dean, School of Graduate and Continuing Studies. The Degree You Need to Achieve TM

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Over-Age, Under-Age, and On-Time Students in Primary School, Congo, Dem. Rep.

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

A Diverse Student Body

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Effectiveness and Successful Program Elements of SOAR s Afterschool Programs

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

ANALYSIS: LABOUR MARKET SUCCESS OF VOCATIONAL AND HIGHER EDUCATION GRADUATES

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

1GOOD LEADERSHIP IS IMPORTANT. Principal Effectiveness and Leadership in an Era of Accountability: What Research Says

BOOM FOR WHOM? How the resurgence of the Bronx is leaving residents behind JULY 2008

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Upward Bound Math & Science Program


The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

CONFERENCE PAPER NCVER. What has been happening to vocational education and training diplomas and advanced diplomas? TOM KARMEL

World s Best Workforce Plan

The Impacts of Regular Upward Bound on Postsecondary Outcomes 7-9 Years After Scheduled High School Graduation

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Trends in College Pricing

Status of Latino Education in Massachusetts: A Report

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

Australia s tertiary education sector

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Data Diskette & CD ROM

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

EARNING. THE ACCT 2016 INVITATIONAL SYMPOSIUM: GETTING IN THE FAST LANE Ensuring Economic Security and Meeting the Workforce Needs of the Nation

NCEO Technical Report 27

Rural Education in Oregon

National Survey of Student Engagement

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

Is Open Access Community College a Bad Idea?

MEASURING GENDER EQUALITY IN EDUCATION: LESSONS FROM 43 COUNTRIES

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Greek-Letter Membership and College Graduation: Does Race Matter?

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

African American Male Achievement Update

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Transcription:

Headline Dropout Rates Among youth ages 16 to 24, Hispanics accounted for 40 percent of all high school dropouts in 2004. However, they only made up 17 percent of the total youth population. (See Figure 1) Importance Young people who drop out of high school are unlikely to have the minimum skills and credentials necessary to function in today s increasingly complex society and technological workplace. The completion of high school is required for accessing postsecondary education and is a minimum requirement for most jobs. 1 High school dropouts are more likely than high school completers to be unemployed. 2 Additionally, a high school diploma leads to higher income and occupational status. 3 Interestingly, however, many youth who drop out of high school eventually earn a diploma or a GED. One study found that 63 percent of students who dropped out had earned a diploma or GED within eight years of the year they should have originally graduated. 4 Studies have found that young adults with low education and skill levels are more likely to live in poverty and to receive government assistance. 5 High school dropouts are likely to stay on public assistance longer than those with at least a high school degree. Further, high school dropouts are more likely to become involved in crime. 6 Trends Dropout rates of young people ages 16 to 24 in the civilian, non-institutionalized population gradually declined between 1972 and 2004, from 15 percent to a low of 10 percent in 2003, where the rate remained in 2004. (See Table 2) In this indicator, dropouts are those who are not enrolled in and have not completed high school. In 1972, the dropout rate among non-hispanic blacks was 21 percent, and, among non-hispanic whites, it was 12 percent. These rates declined substantially for each group between 1992 and 2004, narrowing the gap between the two groups (though the rate for blacks remains twice that of whites). The dropout rate for non-hispanic black youth reached an historic low of 11 percent in 2001. (See Figure 1) This drop is at least in part related to the dramatic increases in incarceration rates among black high school dropouts since 1980, which takes them out of the civilian non-institutionalized population on which these estimates are based. 7 Rates among Hispanic youth have declined in last few years from 30 percent in 1998 to 24 percent in 2004. Differences by Race and Ethnicity Black and Hispanic youth are more likely than non-hispanic whites to drop out of high school. In 2004, 7 percent of non-hispanic whites ages 16 to 24 were not enrolled in

school and had not completed high school, compared with 12 percent of blacks and 24 percent of Hispanics. (See Figure 1) The high rate for Hispanics is in part the result of the high proportion of immigrants in this age group who never attended school in the U.S. 8 Asian youth, with a dropout rate of 4 percent, had the lowest dropout rate among all racial and ethnic groups in 2004. (See Table 1) Note: Estimates for 2004 reflect the new Office of Management and Budget race definitions, and include only those who are identified with a single race. Hispanics may be of any race. Differences by Gender In 2004, 12 percent of males ages 16 to 24 were high school dropouts, compared with 9 percent of females. Although males comprise one-half of the population, they make up 57 percent of the dropouts in this age group. (See Figure 2) Differences by Immigration Status The dropout rates for high-school students ages 16 to 24 vary by immigration status. Foreign-born students had a dropout rate of 26 percent in 2004, compared with 17 percent for children born in the U.S. to foreign-born parents, both of which are higher than the national average. While foreign-born students make up 11 percent of the total population of students in this age group, they make up 28 percent of the dropout population. (See Figure 3) State and Local Estimates State estimates from 2000 through 2003 are available from: http://www.aecf.org/kidscount/sld/compare_results.jsp?i=440&dt=2&yr=4&s=a&dtype= &x=166&y=12 State estimates from 2002 through 2004 are available from: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007026.pdf International Estimates International estimates are available from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) at: http://www.oecd.org/document/11/0,2340,en_2649_37455_35321099_1_1_1_37455,00.h tml (See Indicator A1) National Goals The No Child Left Behind Act, signed into law January 2002, aims to make sure that all children achieve academic proficiency within 12 years and gain the educational skills

necessary to succeed later in life. It also attempts to ensure that children are monitored at an early age to ensure that all children succeed and aims to reduce the achievement gap between subgroups. More information is available at http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml?src=pb. Definition This indicator uses the status dropout rate 9 which measures the percentage of young adults aged 16 through 24 in the civilian, non-institutionalized population who were not enrolled in a high school program and had not received a high school diploma or obtained an equivalency certificate. 10 While this indicator uses status dropout rate, other indicators such as on-time high school completion or high school graduation rates are also used to measure high school outcomes. For more information see the Urban Institute s High School Graduation, Completion, and Dropout (GCD) Indicators available at: http://www.urban.org/uploadedpdf/411116_gcdcatalog.pdf Data Source Data for 2004: Child Trends' calculations of U.S. Census Bureau, School Enrollment-- Social and Economic Characteristics of Students: October 2004: Detailed Tables: Table 1. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/cps2004.html Data for 2003: Child Trends' calculations of U.S. Census Bureau, School Enrollment-- Social and Economic Characteristics of Students: October 2003: Detailed Tables: Table 1. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/cps2003.html Data for 2002: Child Trends' calculations of U.S. Census Bureau, School Enrollment-- Social and Economic Characteristics of Students: October 2002: Detailed Tables: Table 1. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/cps2002.html All other data: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, The Condition of Education 2003. NCES 2003-067. Washington, DC: 2003. Tables 17-1 and 17-2. Based on October Current Population Surveys analysis. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2003067 Raw Data Source U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, October Current Population Survey, various years http://www.bls.census.gov/cps/

Approximate Date of Next Update Summer 2006 1 U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2001. Dropout Rates in the United States: 2000, NCES 2002-114, by P. Kaufman, M.N. Alt, & C.D. Chapman. Washington, DC: Author. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/droppub_2001/ 2 Caspi, A., Wright, B.E., Moffit, T.E., & Silva, P.A., 1998. Childhood Predictors of Unemployment in Early Adulthood, American Sociological Review, 63 (3), 424-451. 3 Miller, P., Mulvey, C. and Martin, N., 1995. What Do Twins Studies Reveal about the Economic Returns to Education? A Comparison of Australian and U.S. Findings, The American Economic Review, 85(3), 586-599; Sewell, W., Hauser, R., & Wolf, W., 1980. Sex, Schooling, and Occupational Status, American Journal of Sociology, 86(3), 551 583. 4 National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Issue Brief: Educational Attainment of High School Drop Outs Eight Years Later, NCES 2005-026. US Department of Education Services. Institute of Education Sciences. Available online at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005026.pdf. 5 Boisjoly, J., Harris, K., and Duncan, G., 1998. Initial Welfare Spells: Trends, Events, and Duration, Social Service Review, 72 (4), 466 492; Moore, K., Glei, D., Driscoll, A., Zaslow, M., and Redd, Z. (in press). Poverty and Welfare Patterns: Implications for Children, Journal of Social Policy. 6 Freeman, R. (1996). Why Do So Many Young American Men Commit Crimes and What Might We Do About It? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(1), 25 42. 7 Western, B. and Pettit, B. (2002). Beyond Crime and Punishment: Prisons and Inequality. Contexts, 1:37-43. 8 Fry, Richard. (2003). Hispanic Youth Dropping Out of U.S. Schools: Measuring the Challenge. Pew Hispanic Center. http://pewhispanic.org/reports/report.php?reportid=19 9 Note: status dropout rate differs from event dropout rate, which is measured as the percentage of young people aged 15 through 24 who dropped out of grades 10 through 12 in the past year. 10 U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Dropout Rates in the United States: 2000, NCES 2002-114, by P. Kaufman, M.N. Alt, & C.D. Chapman. Washington, DC: Author, p. 2. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/droppub_2001/

Figure 1 50 Dropout Rates Among Youth Ages 16 to 24 by Race and Hispanic Origin, October 1972-2004 40 34 Hispanic Percent 30 20 21 Black, non-hispanic 24 10 15 12 All Races White, non-hispanic 12 10 7 0 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 Note: This indicator uses the status dropout rate which measures the percentage of young adults aged 16 to 24 who were not enrolled in a high school program and had not received a high school diploma or obtained an equivalency certificate. Due to changes in the race categories, estimates from 2003 are not strictly comparable to estimates from 2002 and before. Prior to 2001, the black race category included Hispanics. Source: Reproduced from: Sources: Data for 1972-2001: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, The Condition of Education 2003. NCES 2003-067. Washington, DC: 2003. Figure on p. 42. Data for 2002: Child Trends' calculations of U.S. Census Bureau, School Enrollment--Social and Economic Characteristics of Students: October 2002 : Detailed Tables: Table 1. Data for 2003: Child Trends' calculations of U.S. Census Bureau, School Enrollment--Social and Economic Characteristics of Students: October 2003: Detailed Tables: Table 1. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/cps2003.html. Data for 2004: Child Trends' calculations of U.S. Census Bureau, School Enrollment--Social and Economic Characteristics of Students: October 2004: Detailed Tables : Table 1. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/cps2004.html

Figure 2 100 Dropout Rate, Percent of All Dropouts, and Percent of Population of Youth Ages 16 to 24, by Gender, 2004 90 Male Female 80 70 60 56.8 50 43.2 50.4 49.6 40 30 20 10 11.6 9.0 0 Dropout rate per 100 Percent of all dropouts Percent of population Source: Child Trends' calculations of U.S. Census Bureau, School Enrollment--Social and Economic Characteristics of Students: October 2004: Detailed Tables: Table 1. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/cps2004.html

Figure 3 100 90 80 Dropout Rate, Percent of All Dropouts, and Percent of Population of Youth Ages 16 to 24, by Nativity, 2004 Foreign Born Children of Foreign Born Parents 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 25.9 17.0 27.8 37.0 11.1 22.5 0 Dropout rate per 100 Percent of all dropouts Percent of population Source: Child Trends' calculations of U.S. Census Bureau, School Enrollment--Social and Economic Characteristics of Students: October 2004: Detailed Tables: Table 1. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/cps2004.html

Table 1 Dropout Rates 1 and Number and Percentage Distribution of Dropouts Ages 16 to 24, by Selected Characteristics: October 2004 Characteristic Dropout rate (percent) Number of Dropouts (thousands) Percent of all dropouts Percent of population Total 10.3 3,766 100.0 100.0 Gender Male 11.6 2,140 56.8 50.4 Female 9.0 1,626 43.2 49.6 Age 16-17 4.4 380 10.1 23.4 18-19 10.9 840 22.3 21.1 20-21 12.3 984 26.1 21.8 22-24 12.7 1,562 41.5 33.6 Race/ethnicity 2 White, non-hispanic alone 6.7 1,529 40.6 62.1 Black alone 12.1 635 16.9 14.4 Hispanic 23.8 1,499 39.8 17.3 Asian alone 3.5 52 1.4 4.1 Immigration status Foreign Born 25.9 1,048 27.8 11.1 Children of Foreign Born Parents 17.0 1,394 37.0 22.5 Note: Percentages may not add up to 100.0 due to rounding. Details may not add to totals due to rounding. 1 This indicator uses the status dropout rate which measures the percentage of young adults aged 16 to 24 who were not enrolled in a high school program and had not received a high school diploma or obtained an equivalency certificate. 2 Due to relatively small sample sizes, American Indians/Alaskan Natives are included in the total but not shown separately. Hispanics may be of any race. Source: Child Trends' calculations of U.S. Census Bureau, School Enrollment--Social and Economic Characteristics of Students: October 2004: Detailed Tables : Table 1. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/cps2004.html

Table 2 Dropout Rates 1 of 16- to 24-Year Olds, by Race and Hispanic Origin, Selected Years 1972-2004 1972 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Total 2 14.6 13.9 14.1 12.6 12.1 12.0 11.1 11.0 11.8 11.2 10.9 10.7 10.5 9.9 10.3 Race/ethnicity 3 White, non-hispanic 12.3 11.4 11.4 10.4 9.0 8.6 7.3 7.6 7.7 7.3 6.9 7.3 6.5 - - White, non-hispanic alone - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6.3 6.7 Black, non-hispanic 21.3 22.9 19.1 15.2 13.2 12.1 13.0 13.4 13.8 12.6 13.1 10.9 - - - Black alone - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11.7 12.1 Hispanic 34.3 29.2 35.2 27.6 32.4 30.0 29.4 25.3 29.5 28.6 27.8 27.0 25.7 23.5 23.8 1 This indicator uses the status dropout rate which measures the percentage of young adults aged 16 to 24 who were not enrolled in a high school program and had not received a high school diploma or obtained an equivalency certificate. 2 Due to relatively small sample sizes, American Indians/Alaskan Natives and Asians/Pacific Islanders are included in the total but not shown separately. 3 Due to changes in the race categories, estimates from 2003 are not strictly comparable to estimates from 2002 and before. Hispanics may be of any race. Note: "Numbers for years 1987 through 2001 reflect new editing procedures instituted by the Bureau of the Census for cases with missing data on school enrollment items. Numbers for years 1992 through 2000 reflect new wording of the educational attainment item in the CPS beginning in 1992. Numbers for years 1994 through 2000 reflect changes in the CPS due to newly instituted computer-assisted interviewing and the change in the population controls used in the 1990 Census-based estimates, with adjustments for undercounting in the 1990 Census." Source: Data for 1972-2001: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, The Condition of Education 2003. NCES 2003-067. Washington, DC: 2003. Tables 17-1 and 17-2. Based on October Current Population Surveys analysis. Data for 2002: Child Trends' calculations of U.S. Census Bureau, School Enrollment--Social and Economic Characteristics of Students: October 2002: Detailed Tables : Table 1. Data for 2003: Child Trends' calculations of U.S. Census Bureau, School Enrollment--Social and Economic Characteristics of Students: October 2003: Detailed Table s: Table 1. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/cps2003.html. Data for 2004: Child Trends' calculations of U.S. Census Bureau, School Enrollment-- Social and Economic Characteristics of Students: October 2004: Detailed Tables : Table 1. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/cps2004.html