School Year

Similar documents
State Parental Involvement Plan

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Cuero Independent School District

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

ASCD Recommendations for the Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Strategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013

African American Male Achievement Update

Shelters Elementary School

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Foundations of Bilingual Education. By Carlos J. Ovando and Mary Carol Combs

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Cooper Upper Elementary School

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Collaborative Classroom Co-Teaching in Inclusive Settings Course Outline

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Executive Summary. DoDEA Virtual High School

Trends & Issues Report

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Academic Affairs Policy #1

Requesting Title II, Part A Services. A Guide for Christian School Administrators

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

District English Language Learners (ELL) Plan

Race to the Top (RttT) Monthly Report for US Department of Education (USED) NC RttT February 2014

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

Program Change Proposal:

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

Academic Affairs Policy #1

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

School Leadership Rubrics

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

AYP: Adequate Yearly Progress

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Educational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Financing Education In Minnesota

SSTATE SYSIP STEMIC IMPROVEMENT PL A N APRIL 2016

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

State of New Jersey

Educating Georgia s Future gadoe.org. Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent. Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent. gadoe.

Hokulani Elementary School

Pyramid. of Interventions

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

El Toro Elementary School

Kahului Elementary School

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

An Industrial Technologist s Core Knowledge: Web-based Strategy for Defining Our Discipline

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report. Sarasota County School District April 25-27, 2016

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

ESTABLISHING A TRAINING ACADEMY. Betsy Redfern MWH Americas, Inc. 380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 200 Broomfield, CO

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

State Budget Update February 2016

Transcription:

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DIVISION OF STUDENT SERVICES Office of Title I Program Planning and Accountability Project Plan: Title I Turnkey Training School Year 2003-2004 As of June 30, 2004 Submitted to: Isaac Bryant, Assistant Commissioner, Division of Student Services Reviewed by: Suzanne Ochse, Director, Office of Title I Program Planning and Accountability Prepared by: Michele J. Doughty, Education Program Development Specialist I/Coordinator

Project Description: Scope of Program The Office of Title I Program Planning and Accountability is committed to providing training and technical assistance to Title I districts and schools across the state since the inception of the reauthorized Improving America s Schools Act of 1994 and the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. The New Jersey Department of Education through the Office of Title I Program Planning and Accountability serves as the vehicle to provide training and technical assistance for Title I-Part A and Comprehensive School Reform. The following relates to the administration of the training: Mission Statement The mission of the Office of Title I Program Planning and Accountability is to present a structured system of training to disseminate critical Title I policies and procedures to districts and schools. This will ultimately effect high student achievement in Title I schools. It also seeks to identify best practices for the implementation by Title I districts and schools. Background The Office of Title I Program Planning and Accountability developed and implemented training and technical assistance to four hundred and fifty Title I districts and related constituents. The following modules were structured and implemented across the state to comply with federal Title I technical assistance guidelines: The Single Accountability System Technical Guidance for Title I Program Managers The Changing Role of the Title I Program Manager Closing the Achievement Gap through the Use of Disaggregated Data A Critical Focus: Promising Practices to Promote Literacy in Title I Schools The Reauthorization of Title I Title I Services for Nonpublic School Students Implementing Targeted Assistance Programs Building a Stronger Foundation in Title I Schools through Parent Involvement and Family Literacy High Poverty Schools: Building Capacity through Title I Schoolwide Programs School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services Inclusion of All Children in Title I Schools Transitioning Title I Students to the Secondary School Level

In addition, training was structured and implemented statewide about the single accountability system, paraprofessional requirements, school choice and supplemental educational services and comprehensive school reform. A two day institute was also structured and implemented for principals and central office administration (i.e. chief school administrators, superintendents, Title I directors, school management leaders) for schools that were identified in need of improvement. In school year 2002-2003, two hundred and fifty-seven (257) schools were identified in need of improvement. In 2003-2004, nine (9) of these schools met state standards in both Language Arts Literacy and Mathematics. Thirty-six (36) schools made adequate yearly progress in both portions of the test. Fourteen (14) schools must offer school choice. A total of two hundred and fourteen (214) including the six schools did not make adequate yearly progress and must offer school choice and supplemental educational services. Status Year 1 Choice Year 1 Choice (made AYP 1 year) Year 2 SES & Choice Number of Schools 14 36 214 The new single accountability system requires that ninety-five percent of school level students take the state assessments. Additionally, state performance benchmarks have been established for each grade level cluster (grades 3-5, 6-8, and 9-12) and each content area. In addition, ten student subgroups are required to be analyzed using state assessment data, if there are twenty or more pupils tested in the subgroup. The single accountability system outlines the following: Districts are required to provide technical assistance to schools identified in improvement status: Schools identified in need of improvement are required to develop a school improvement plan in consultation with parents, school staff, the district and other experts. District school improvement plan components must include scientifically based research strategies, professional development, extended learning time strategies, strategies to promote effective parental involvement and mentoring of new teachers. The single accountability system has resulted in an increase in the identification of achievement gaps among students disaggregated through assessment data. This includes ten subgroup areas for all districts and schools within the state of New Jersey. Schools are now identifying achievement gaps among the student subgroups that were previously exempt from the requirements of disaggregating data. As a result of the single accountability federal requirements, which now requires all schools to analyze achievement gaps; there is an imminent need to expand beyond current training boundaries and include all education stakeholders through implementation of a turnkey training plan articulated through regional, county offices and Abbott division. 3

10 Subgroups Total; White; African American; Hispanics; Asian/Pacific Islander; Native American/Indian students; Other racial group students; Economically disadvantaged students; Students with disabilities; and Students with limited English proficiency Impact of the Single Accountability System The impact of the single accountability system has resulted in the need to expand training opportunities to all districts and schools within the state of New Jersey. As a result of the single accountability system all districts are held accountable for the academic performance of its students. Facilitation The former Title I training and technical assistance strategic plan involved the development, facilitation, and implementation of centralized and regionalized training sessions conducted in coordination with major educational experts and facilitators across the state and nation. The services were primarily provided for Title I districts and their schools. Proposal Description and Rationale This proposal seeks to address the impact of the NCLB legislation by recommending the development of a turnkey training system which involves consistent and ongoing training through facilitation at the three (3) regional, twenty-one (21) county offices and the Abbott division (Refer to Diagram 1.). NJDOE Bilingual Special Education Title I Standards & Assessment Abbott & Grants Appeals NJPEP Regional Southern Regional Central Regional Northern County Offices Abbotts County Offices Abbotts County Offices Abbotts District/Schools Districts/Schools Districts/Schools 4

The training sessions are scheduled and provided to districts and school staff by representatives of the region, county and Abbott personnel. These sessions are to be delivered by those representatives based on the needs of the districts and schools within those regions. Goals and Objectives Goal 1: To develop a process and the content for a turnkey training system in collaboration with the three regional offices, twenty-one county offices and the Abbott division with input from internal and external education experts. Objectives 1.1 Ongoing delivery of structured training to enhance the quality of teaching and learning for districts and schools that provide service to educationally disadvantaged students. 1.2 Ongoing communication and collaboration fostered between the three tiers of educational governance; state education agency, the local districts and schools. 1.3 Ongoing fulfillment of policy requirements proposed in relation to Title I policy and NCLB federal legislation. Goal 2: To implement training modules for use by regional, county offices and the Abbott division, for delivery to Title I districts, districts and schools (public, charter, private) that serve educationally disadvantaged children and youth. Objectives: 2.1 Coordination and delivery of Title I training and technical assistance plan for facilitation at the district and school level. 2.2 Coordination and outreach to Title I districts in collaboration with educational constituents to strengthen and enhance the profile of services delivered to educationally disadvantaged children and youth. Goal 3: To disseminate information to Title I districts, districts and school identified in need of improvement. Objective 3.1 Ongoing delivery of modules to provide districts and schools with assistance in critical areas related to accountability, school improvement, guidance for program managers, scientifically based research programs and parental involvement. 5

Audience All Title I districts and schools in the state have equal opportunities to participate in sessions that are held in accessible sites. The Office of Title I Program Planning and Accountability will work in collaboration with regional, county and Abbott staff. Sessions may be coordinated cross county and regional boundaries. Homogeneous and heterogeneous groupings and other configurations of district and school staff occur depending upon the subject area and module. Regional presentation teams will be structured consisting of facilitators, presenters and provided to chief school administrators, principals, curriculum directors, and parent coordinators. (Refer to Diagram 2.). Private Schools Districts and Schools in need of improvement Title I/Program Offices Region County Abbott Schools Charter Schools Districts Diagram 2. Proposed Benefits The Office of Title I Program Planning and Accountability, is proposing to turnkey modules to the three regional offices, twenty-one county offices and Abbott division. This system will result in the following benefits for Title I districts, schools, charter schools and schools and districts identified in need of improvement across the state of New Jersey. 1. Capacity building through regional, county offices and the Abbott division for all Title I districts, schools and districts and schools identified in need of improvement. 2. Collaboration with program offices to develop and implement a comprehensive training program. 3. Delivery of an effective training plan for all Title I districts, schools and districts and schools identified in need of improvement. 4. Provision of training and technical assistance in locations convenient to the districts and schools. 6

5. Increased services to districts and schools for technical assistance as a result of assessment data; 6. Enhanced preparation of regional, county offices and Abbott division to respond to questions from districts and schools within their region about Title I Part-A of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001; 7. Increased capacity of the regional, county offices and Abbott division to serve as reform catalysts to improve student achievement among low performing schools; 8. Increased involvement and cross collaboration among local districts to provide technical assistance to Title I districts, schools and to districts and schools identified for improvement; 9. Greater cost effectiveness and better utilization of program and fiscal resources. 10. Increased services to provide information for parental involvement. 11. Increased student achievement. 12. Reduced duplication of services. Logistics The training and technical assistance sessions are arranged by the training facilitators. Site locations, registration and refreshments are arranged by the training facilitators. Deliverable Services The Office of Title I Program Planning and Accountability conducts turnkey training sessions for regional and county offices to implement training modules that are critical to Title I districts, schools and districts and schools identified for improvement. The training modules are developed by the Office of Title I Program Planning in coordination with NJDOE program offices and other expert organizations (i.e., Region III, NJPEP, etc). The following occurs through the interaction: Collaboration and coordination with internal and external experts on the development and implementation of training modules; Collaboration and assistance in the delivery of turnkey training sessions through regional and county specialist for the ongoing implementation of the training modules; Collaboration with the three regional representatives, twenty-one county representatives and representatives from the Abbott division to facilitate the delivery of the training modules; Collaboration and guidance to workgroup strategic training team; Collaboration on the development of frameworks for training modules and the process for training implementation; Collaboration with web based experts and resources that are available and accessible for the delivery of information to Title I districts and staff. Collaboration and coordination with relevant experts to serve as a training resources; Collaboration with New Jersey Professional Education Port (NJPEP) for the development of modules to turnkey services for parents, teacher in-service, district and school showcase, interactive illustrations, and FAQ through web based mechanisms and video conferencing. The following diagrams (3-7) outline four critical training modules and recommended components to implement the training and technical assistance through the three regional offices, twenty-one county offices and Abbott division. 7

Training Modules Six training modules: (1) The Single Accountability System, (2) Scientifically Based Research Programs, (3) Title I Program Managers, (4) Parent Involvement, (5) Understanding NCLB Sanctions for Schools in Need of Improvement and (6) NCLB Teacher Training. 6 Modules Diagram 3. SINGLE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM/ SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING SCIENTIFICALLY BASED RESEARCH PROGRAMS TITLE I PROGRAM MANAGERS TRAINING NCLB TEACHER TRAINING PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT UNDERSTANDING NCLB SANCTIONS FOR SCHOOLS IN NEED OF IMPROVEMENT 8

Module Description I. Accountability for School Improvement Planning This session provides insight into New Jersey s single accountability system; examines critical accountability policies at the state and federal levels and presents accurate information related to adequate yearly progress. The session also presents research-based strategies to enable districts and schools to develop systems to close achievement gaps among minority students and reach the goal of one hundred percent proficiency by year 2014. It will assist Title I districts/schools and districts and schools identified in need of improvement to make the appropriate decisions to implement high level programs to target student performance. Additionally, it will examine the role of other states, model districts/schools that have successfully used measures that are essential for the accountability of educational outcomes for disadvantaged children. The session will also illustrate the data driven processes that states, districts and schools have implemented to measure performance outcomes. Module I Accountability for School Improvement Planning Overview of Single Accountability System Accountability Policy Identification of Achievement Gaps Data Analysis and Decision Making for High Student Performance Address needs of subgroups The School Improvement Plan - prioritizing Monitor, Evaluate and Refine the School Improvement Plan 9

II. Scientifically Research Based Programs This session will focus on scientifically-based research and effective approaches designed to meet the needs of elementary and secondary students in Title I districts/schools. Best practices used nationally to improve reading, writing and mathematics will be shared. This session focuses on a variety of research based programs that encourage high student achievement. Module II Scientifically Based Research Programs Targeted Assistance Programs (Extended day, summer, after school programs) Schoolwide Programs Comprehensive Needs Assessment Effective Scientifically Based Research Programs Language Arts Literacy Mathematics School Reform Strategies Comprehensive School Reform High Qualified Professionals Professional Development Parental Involvement Preschool Transition Strategies School Choice/Supplemental Svc 10

III. Title I Program Managers This session will provide an overview of the federal reporting requirements and offer information for planning programs designed to meet the needs of economically and educationally disadvantaged children at the school level. It will provide guidance and insight on ways to better serve children in Title I schools. Practical guidance on how instructional leadership and the role of the manager is critical in the implementation process will also be discussed. Techniques for organizing, managing and implementing programs will be shared. New program managers or existing managers that may need a refresher are encouraged to attend this session. Program managers involved in Title I programs will benefit from understanding the Title I process and programs that have been designed to accommodate the needs of economically and educationally disadvantaged children. Module III Guidance for Title I Program Managers Planning Reporting Timelines Management Fiscal Roles of Central Office District Level Technical Assistance 11

IV. Parental Involvement This session will discuss parental involvement polices that are required at the district and school level. It will also review the parents right-to-know and reporting requirements that parents may request under Title I legislation. The research has also shown substantial evidence that parental involvement is a critical factor in determining the academic success of students. In order for children to be academically successful, families must be literate and understand the roles that they play in promoting their child s academic development. Additionally, strategies and tools to promote parent and school partnerships though written parental policies and parent-school compacts will also be discussed. It will discuss information related to school choice, supplemental educational services, and paraprofessionals. Public Accountability Module IV Building Capacity through Parental Involvement District and School Responsibility Written Policy and Compacts Parental Involvement Requirements School Choice/Supplemental Services Parental Support and Communication Web based instructional services for parents and teachers 12

V. Understanding NCLB Sanctions for Schools in Need of Improvement - This session will focus on each level of sanctions for schools identified in need of improvement under the NCLB requirements. It will provide information and assistance to districts and school regarding sanctions specifically related to school choice, supplemental educational services, and the corrective action phases. LEA s will be able to understand a broader role in assisting districts that are in the corrective action status. The school will be provided with guidelines to evaluate its individual school improvement plans. Module V Understanding NCLB Sanctions for Schools Identified in Need of Improvement Level I School Choice Level II Supplemental Services School Improvement Process Levels of Sanctions Level III Corrective Action LEA Technical Assistance Evaluation and Refinement of School Improvement Plan 13

VI. NCLB Teacher Training Module - This session will focus on providing teachers at the school level with critical information related to No Child Left Behind. Specifically, areas related to accountability, assessment, data driven analysis, effective classroom practices, scientifically-based research programs, parental involvement/communications and professional development will be discussed to enable teachers to turnkey information to other teachers, parents, and community leaders. This session should enable schools and districts to collaborate making critical decision concerning student achievement. Module VI NCLB Teacher Training Understanding Accountability Assessment/Data Driven Analysis Student Achievement at the Classroom Level Scientifically-based Research Programs Parental Involvement/Communications Professional Development 14

Title I Training Program Outcomes ANTICIPATED OUTCOME 1: The first year of the turnkey training strategic program plan will serve to lay the infrastructure for the three regional, twenty-one county offices and Abbott division to implement training for Title I districts, schools and districts and schools that are in improvement status. The reorganization of critical training components will be restructured as needed. It is anticipated that the training will provide an expert system of training on diverse technical areas related to Title I and school identified in need of improvement. ANTICIPATED OUTCOME 2: The Office of Title I Program Planning and Accountability will provide expert guidance and training on the turnkey training strategic plan for regional offices, county offices and the Abbott division to administer to Title I districts and schools. ANTICIPATED OUTCOME 3: The Title I turnkey training strategic program plan will provide four modules for regional, county offices and the Abbott division to administer: They include the following: (1). The Single Accountability System, (2) Scientifically Based Research Programs, (3). Guidance for Title I Program Managers and (4) Parental Involvement. These modules will be accompanied by technical resources such as PowerPoint presentations, scripts, activities and handouts. ANTICIPATED OUTCOME 4: Title I districts, schools and districts and schools that have been identified in need of improvement will be presented with the resources needed to foster high student achievement through the delivery of ongoing information and assistance. ANTICIPATED TIMELINES November 2003 December 15, 2003 January 26, 2004 February 17, 2004 March 15, 2004 April 15, 2004 May 15, 2004 Title I Turnkey Strategic Plan Proposal Development Formulation of Turnkey Training Workgroup Schedule meeting for feedback and revisions Module Development Module Development Module Development Module Implementation and Development (*Title I Program Managers module completed and ready for implementation statewide through regional offices.) Module outlines finalized 15

June 15, 2004 July 15, 2004 August 15, 2004 September 2004 October-December 2004 Module Development Preliminary Module draft for each remaining module Modules Finalized Six Modules Implemented Development of online version of six modules (Title I Program Managers, Parental Involvement, School Improvement, Parental Involvement, Scientifically Based Research, NCLB Teacher Training) 16