School Profile - Fall 2017

Similar documents
2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Idaho Public Schools

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Shelters Elementary School

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

School Performance Plan Middle/High Schools

African American Male Achievement Update

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Hokulani Elementary School

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Evaluation of Teach For America:

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Access Center Assessment Report

Bellehaven Elementary

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

State of New Jersey

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Kahului Elementary School

Best Colleges Main Survey

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

Engage Educate Empower

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Implementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Status of Latino Education in Massachusetts: A Report

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

State Parental Involvement Plan

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Wave III Education Data

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

What Does ESSA Mean for English Learners and #ESSAforELs

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

El Toro Elementary School

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT


SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

2015 Annual Report to the School Community

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

DAS-REMI District Accountability System Reporting, Evaluating, and Monitoring Instrument for the P2E2020SBP

World s Best Workforce Plan

LIM College New York, NY

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Transportation Equity Analysis

PEIMS Submission 1 list

Transcription:

race / ethnicity years employed KASA (Knowledge and Success Academy) School Profile - Fall 17 Welcome School Information School profiles present a summary of up to three years of public schoolwide data on each school in the district. They include information on staff tenure, official enrollment, student demographics, attendance, suspensions, and the school survey. This profile also reports results from the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) assessments for Grades 6 through 8 as well as Algebra 1, Algebra 2, and English 1, and indicators of students' readiness for college and career, such as performance on SAT and Advanced Placement (AP) exams. For more information, visit baltimorecityschools.org. Enrollment Phone Management Type 443-642-267 Traditional Address Grades Served 6-12 Edgewood Street Baltimore, MD 21216 Principal Tenure with City Schools Hill, Saeed 19 years Teachers Official figures are based on full-time teachers as of 1/15/17. Percentage of Teachers by Tenure in City Schools Total No. of Teachers 25 1+ 36. 6-1 24. No Data Available 3-5 4. -2 36. % of teachers Student enrollment is determined on September 3 of the school year specified. Total enrollment for SY 17-18 is included; demographic and subgroup data is for SY 16-17. Total Student Enrollment 17 Percentage of Enrollment by Demographic 454 453 425 37 African American 95.5 2.8 Hispanic/Latino 15 16 17 18 Prior to 15-16, determination of low-income status was based on eligibility for free or reduced-price meals (FARMs). In 15-16, under the federal Community Eligibility Provision for districts in low-income areas, City Schools began providing free meals to all students without need to collect FARMs applications. In that transition year, reporting about low-income students included FARMs applications plus direct certification of homeless or foster care status, participation in programs for low-income families (e.g., SNAP, TANF), or Medicaid eligibility. For 16-17, direct certification (as of June 3 or September 3, 16) is the only methodology used. While the percentage of low-income students generally remains unchanged, this change in methodology has resulted in a reported low-income percentage approximately points lower than would be reported using FARMs forms, with variation at individual schools. 15-17 Percentage of Enrollment in Low Income Subgroup 15 FARMs 16 FARMs 16 Direct Cert 17 Direct Cert 17 Percentage of Enrollment by Subgroup EL EL SWD SWD 34.6% Non-EL Non-SWD 99.8% 65.4% Key: FARMs = free and reduced-price meals; Direct Cert = direct certification; ELL = English language learner i.e., students whose primary or home language is not English and have been assessed as having limited English proficiency; SWD = students with disabilities i.e., those who have current Individualized Education Programs. An asterisk () indicates less than 1% data not reported. 82.6 87. 76.6 77.9

Attendance Attendance rates are calculated by dividing the total number of days attended by the total number of days enrolled during the school year. Chronic absence rate is the percent of students who were absent more than days, among students who were enrolled for at least 9 days during the school year. Data are for the school year ending in the calendar year indicated (i.e., "17" indicates the 16-17 school year). Suspensions The number of suspensions in a school year includes all suspension incidents and expulsions. Attendance Rate (%) Chronic Absence Rate (%) Count of Suspension Incidents 85.2 85.1 71.7 69.2 37.6 37.7 45 18 39 15 16 17 15 16 17 15 16 17 School Survey The annual school survey is given to students in grades 3 to 12, all school-based staff, and parents of students in pre-k to grade 12. Three separate indices were calculated that represent a combination of student, staff, and parent reports. They reflect key measures of school climate as defined by the National School Climate Center. Data are not reported when any of the three groups had 5 or fewer respondents, or if the response rates for students or staff were less than 3 percent. The Physical Security Index measures the extent to which students and staff feel safe in a school building, parents feel that their child is safe, and students fighting and bringing weapons to school is NOT a problem. The Respectful Relationships Index measures the extent to which students and staff report that there are respectful relationships among students and between students and staff at their school. The School Connectedness Index measures the extent to which students and staff feel they belong at the school, that parents feel welcome, that staff and parents work closely to meet students needs, and that the administration is responsive to parent and staff concerns. Data are for the school year ending in the calendar year indicated (i.e., "17" indicates the 16-17 school year). For detailed information, visit the City Schools website. Physical Security Index Respectful Relationships Index School Connectedness Index 67.6 47.2 7.5 45.7 34.9 58.9 73. 76. 83.8 15 16 17 15 16 17 15 16 17-2 -

PARCC Results - Grades 6-8 The PARCC (Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers) assessment, aligned to Maryland s College and Career-Ready Standards, is administered in both Math and ELA in Grades 3-8 and for students in Algebra I, Algebra II, and English 1. Results are color coded and categorized by the percentage of students achieving each performance level. indicates the total percentage of students achieving performance levels 4 or 5 on the PARCC exam (those performance levels, respectively, signify that students have met or expectations for grade level learning). A value of '' indicates that the data is suppressed due to the number of students tested. The percentages of students in each performance level may not add up to due to rounding; the percentages of students in levels 4 and 5 may not add up to the total " " due to rounding. MATHEMATICS ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Percent at Each Performance Level - All Students, 17 Percent at Each Performance Level - All Students, 17 81.6 78.1 14.7 2.9.7 19. 2.9 16-17 136 Students Tested 137 Students Tested 1% 9% 26% 17 17 % 16% % 16 8% 27% 16 16-17 Year School District State Year School District 1% 2% 15% 38% State 1 - Have Not Met Expectations 2 - Partially Met Expectations 3 - Approached Expectations 4 - Met Expectations 5 - Exceeded Expectations Black Hispanic / Latino Race/Ethnicity, 15-17.8.6 Black Hispanic / Latino Race/Ethnicity, 15-17 2.5 1.9 Subgroup, 15-17 Students with Disabilities English Learners Economically.9.7 Disadvantaged Subgroup, 15-17 Students with Disabilities English Learners Economically Disadvantaged 1.4 2. Denotes subgroup with fewer than 1 students who took the test. Economically disadvantaged (ED) indicates students who have been identified as enrolled in a direct certification program starting in SY 16-17 and ED is the new terminology used to refer to students historically identified as low-income or FARMs students under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). For SY 15-16, ED performance includes students listed as receiving Free or Reduced Meals (FARMs) on the September 3th enrollment file for SY 15-16 based on their eligibility in SY 14-15."n/a" indicates the test is not given at this school. - 3 -

PARCC Results - Algebra I and English 1 The PARCC (Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers) assessment, aligned to Maryland s College and Career-Ready Standards, is administered in both Math and ELA in Grades 3-8 and for students in Algebra I, Algebra II, and English 1. Results are color coded and categorized by the percentage of students achieving each performance level. indicates the total percentage of students achieving performance levels 4 or 5 on the PARCC exam (those performance levels, respectively, signify that students have met or expectations for grade level learning). A value of '' indicates that the data is suppressed due to the number of students tested. The percentages of students in each performance level may not add up to due to rounding; the percentages of students in levels 4 and 5 may not add up to the total " " due to rounding. ALGEBRA I ENGLISH 1 Percent at Each Performance Level - All Students, 17 Percent at Each Performance Level - All Students, 17 84.8 48.5 49.5 2. 13. 2.2 16-17 11 Students Tested 46 Students Tested % 11% 36% % 17% 17 17 16 16 16-17 Year School District State Year % 14% 36% 3% 18% School District 49% 44% State 1 - Have Not Met Expectations 2 - Partially Met Expectations 3 - Approached Expectations 4 - Met Expectations 5 - Exceeded Expectations Black Hispanic / Latino Race/Ethnicity, 15-17 # Black Hispanic / Latino Race/Ethnicity, 15-17 2.6 11.1 Subgroup, 15-17 Students with 12. Disabilities 12. English Learners Economically Disadvantaged Subgroup, 15-17 Students with Disabilities English Learners Economically Disadvantaged 2.9 Denotes subgroup with fewer than 1 students who took the test. Economically disadvantaged (ED) indicates students who have been identified as enrolled in a direct certification program starting in SY 16-17 and ED is the new terminology used to refer to students historically identified as low-income or FARMs students under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). For SY 15-16, ED performance includes students listed as receiving Free or Reduced Meals (FARMs) on the September 3th enrollment file for SY 15-16 based on their eligibility in SY 14-15."n/a" indicates the test is not given at this school. - 4 -

PARCC Results - Algebra II The PARCC (Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers) assessment, aligned to Maryland s College and Career-Ready Standards, is administered in both Math and ELA in Grades 3-8 and for students in Algebra I, Algebra II, and English 1. Results are color coded and categorized by the percentage of students achieving each performance level. indicates the total percentage of students achieving performance levels 4 or 5 on the PARCC exam (those performance levels, respectively, signify that students have met or expectations for grade level learning). A value of '' indicates that the data is suppressed due to the number of students tested. The percentages of students in each performance level may not add up to due to rounding; the percentages of students in levels 4 and 5 may not add up to the total " " due to rounding. ALGEBRA II Percent at Each Performance Level - All Students, 17 8 2 25 Students Tested 16-17 17 16 Year % % School 7% 6% District 27% 27% State 1 - Have Not Met Expectations 2 - Partially Met Expectations 3 - Approached Expectations 4 - Met Expectations 5 - Exceeded Expectations Race/Ethnicity, 15-17 Black Hispanic / Latino Subgroup, 15-17 Students with Disabilities English Learners Economically Disadvantaged Denotes subgroup with fewer than 1 students who took the test. Economically disadvantaged (ED) indicates students who have been identified as enrolled in a direct certification program starting in SY 16-17 and ED is the new terminology used to refer to students historically identified as lowincome or FARMs students under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). For SY 15-16, ED performance includes students listed as receiving Free or Reduced Meals (FARMs) on the September 3th enrollment file for SY 15-16 based on their eligibility in SY 14-15."n/a" indicates the test is not given at this school. - 5 -

% of students % of students % of students KASA (Knowledge and Success Academy) High School Assessment Paths to Graduation With the introduction of PARCC in SY14-15, MSDE issued new requirements for meeting high school assessment requirements for graduating. Depending on when students entered 9th grade and when they took certain required courses (Algebra, Biology, English, Government), students can meet their high school assessment requirements through several pathways, including sitting for (but not passing) certain tests, passing individual tests, meeting combined score criteria, and completing coursework or Bridge projects. These requirements are subject to change in coming years. For full details, please visit baltimorecityschools.org. Graduation and Dropout Rates 4- and 5-year graduation and dropout rates are based on entering cohorts of 9th-grade students. For example, the Class of 15 includes students who entered 9th grade in 11. 4-year measures include outcomes through August after the 4th year; 5-year measures include outcomes through the following June. Data are for the school year ending in the calendar year indicated (i.e., "16" indicates the 15-16 school year). 4-Year Graduation Rate (%) 5-Year Graduation Rate (%) 4-Year Dropout Rate (%) 6 68.9 5.8 58.5 7 73.9 17.5 6.7 2 Class of 14 15 16 Class of 13 14 15 Class of 14 15 16 Fall College Enrollment among Graduates College enrollment rates indicate the percentage of students who enrolled in college by the fall following high school graduation. Data reflect only those students whose colleges participate in the National Student Clearinghouse. "n/a" indicates there are no available data to report yet. "S" indicates data is surppressed due to FERPA. Data are for the graduating class indicated (i.e., Class of 15 indicates the students graduating in the 14-15 school year). NOTE: Data for the Class of 16 will be available in Spring 18. (Source: BERC Baltimore City Schools College Fact Book) Class of 13 Class of 14 Class of 15 Number Of Graduates 28 25 34 Number of Graduates Enrolled in College S S 11 Percentage of Graduates Enrolled in College 35.7 36. 32.4-6 -

College and Career Readiness Research shows that participation and performance in college admissions exams, such as the SAT, and preparatory exams, such as the PSAT, are related to college- and career-readiness outcomes. This relationship was seen in the rates of enrollment in two- and four-year programs and rates of completion of college credit entry-level courses without the need for remedial courses. Data below measure all students in grades 9 to 12 in the school in the given school year. Data are for the school year ending in the calendar year indicated (i.e., "16" indicates the 15-16 school year). (Source: College Board) PSAT Performance The PSAT, typically taken by students in 9th and 1th grade, measures students skills in two academic areas important for success in college. Data are provided by the College Board. Results include students who took the PSAT in the given school year. The composite score is the sum of each student's score on the two sections of the PSAT, Math and Evidence Based Reading & Writing. Composite scores are subject to rounding. NOTE: The scoring for SAT changed in 16 from three content areas to two (Evidence Based Reading & Writing and Math). PSAT 16 17 Total Number of Students 68 52 Average Evidence-Based Reading & Writing Score 355 344 Average Math Score 375 339 Average Composite Score 73 683 DISTRICT AVERAGE COMPOSITE SCORE 3 4 SAT Performance The SAT, typically taken by students in 11th and 12th grade, assesses students academic readiness for college. Data are provided by the College Board. Results include all students who took the SAT within the given school year. The composite score is the sum of each student's score on the two sections of the SAT. Data are not reported for confidentiality reasons if fewer than 1 students take the exam. Composite scores are subject to rounding. Data are for the school year ending in the calendar year indicated (i.e., "16" indicates the 15-16 school year). SAT Total Number of Students Average Evidence-Based Reading & Writing Score Average Math Score Average Composite Score DISTRICT AVERAGE COMPOSITE SCORE 16 17 29 36 3 1 393 374 772 773 891 899-7 -

College and Career Readiness (cont.) predictors of college and career readiness include performance on Advanced Placement (AP) exams (a score of 3 is usually considered passing and is typically accepted to receive college credit; the maximum score is 5) and enrollment in and completion of a Career and Technology Education (CTE) program. Data below reflect all students in grades 9 to 12 in the school in the given school year. An asterisk () denotes fewer than 1 students in the group. "n/a" indicates there are no available data to report. Data are for the school year ending in the calendar year indicated (i.e., "16" indicates the 15-16 school year). (Sources: College Board, SMS) Advanced Placement 15 16 17 Number of exams taken 28 21 Number of students taking 1 or more exam Number of exams with a score of 3 or above Percentage of AP exams with 3 or better 21 17 -- Career and Technology Education Number of students taking CTE courses Number of students receiving certifications 15 16 17 56 5-8 -