Does Economic Disadvantage Matter for Student Achievement?

Similar documents
ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Shelters Elementary School

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Financing Education In Minnesota

Regions Of Georgia For 2nd Grade

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Georgia Department of Education

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

African American Male Achievement Update

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Two-thirds of APS Schools Increase on State CCRPI Scores

Rural Education in Oregon

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Educational Attainment

Estimating the Cost of Meeting Student Performance Standards in the St. Louis Public Schools

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

Price Sensitivity Analysis

FOUR STARS OUT OF FOUR

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

Georgia Professional Standards Commission. Presentation to GASPA Spring 2013

Philosophy of Literacy. on a daily basis. My students will be motivated, fluent, and flexible because I will make my reading

State of New Jersey

Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development Volume V, Issue 3 - Fall 2011

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Introduce yourself. Change the name out and put your information here.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

NCEO Technical Report 27

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Bellehaven Elementary

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Unequal Opportunity in Environmental Education: Environmental Education Programs and Funding at Contra Costa Secondary Schools.

Jefferson County School District Testing Plan

Teacher and School Characteristics: Predictors of Student Achievement in Georgia Public Schools

Biological Sciences, BS and BA

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

No Parent Left Behind

Status of Latino Education in Massachusetts: A Report

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Home Access Center. Connecting Parents to Fulton County Schools

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

Norms How were TerraNova 3 norms derived? Does the norm sample reflect my diverse school population?

Georgia State University Official Transcript Statement of Authenticity

Diploma in Library and Information Science (Part-Time) - SH220

National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2010

Identifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities Part 3: Referral & Evaluation Process; Documentation Requirements

Linking the Ohio State Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Dr. Brent Benda and Ms. Nell Smith

Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois

FTE General Instructions

Outreach Connect User Manual

Academic Support Services Accelerated Learning Classes The Learning Success Center SMARTHINKING Student computer labs Adult Education

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

Charter School Performance Comparable to Other Public Schools; Stronger Accountability Needed

The University of Michigan-Flint. The Committee on the Economic Status of the Faculty. Annual Report to the Regents. June 2007

Table of Contents PROCEDURES

Trends in College Pricing

Indiana Bonus #2. Prentice Hall Grades 6 & 7 Free Teacher Print Resources Per classroom teacher with a minimum purchase of 50 Student Editions

THE EFFECTS OF TEACHING THE 7 KEYS OF COMPREHENSION ON COMPREHENSION DEBRA HENGGELER. Submitted to. The Educational Leadership Faculty

FY11 Professional Development Expenditures And Learner Pre-post Test Score Gains

Benchmark Testing In Language Arts

Session 2B From understanding perspectives to informing public policy the potential and challenges for Q findings to inform survey design

FractionWorks Correlation to Georgia Performance Standards

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

New Hanover County Schools Announce the Results for the READY Assessments and Report the Highest Graduation Rate to Date

AYP: Adequate Yearly Progress

Access Center Assessment Report

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

State Parental Involvement Plan

6 Financial Aid Information

Five Challenges for the Collaborative Classroom and How to Solve Them

Welcome to SAT Brain Boot Camp (AJH, HJH, FJH)

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

1GOOD LEADERSHIP IS IMPORTANT. Principal Effectiveness and Leadership in an Era of Accountability: What Research Says

Annual Report Accredited Member

Transcription:

Does Economic Disadvantage Matter for Student Achievement? July 2014 Atlanta Regional Commission For more information, contact: mcarnathan@atlantaregional.com

180,000 160,000 140,000 169,150 Total Student Enrollment by School District (October 2013) 120,000 100,000 110,001 99,388 95,232 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 52,296 50,131 40,720 39,760 25,577 20,159 16,047 8,879 4,167 3,986 This Regional Snapshot examines the 10-county school districts in Metro Atlanta, plus city school districts of Atlanta, Buford, Decatur, and Marietta. The Gwinnett County School District has the highest enrollment in the region, with almost 170,000 students, including Pre-K enrollment. Source: GA DOE

Percent Economic Disadvantage by School District 100 90 80 87 70 60 50 40 75 71 68 66 61 56 52 50 45 45 30 20 10 32 25 21 0 Clayton Atlanta DeKalb Marietta Rockdale Douglas Gwinnett Henry Buford Cobb Fulton Cherokee Fayette Decatur Economic Disadvantage is defined by the number of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunches. Each school system has varying degrees of economic disadvantage, ranging from a high in Clayton County of 87 percent, to a low in the of Decatur of 21 percent.

CCRPI Results By School Type

College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI) The College and Career Ready Performance Index is a comprehensive measure to assess school quality and improvement that was recently developed by the Georgia Department of Education to replace the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) ratings. Each school and district are given an overall index score, which is based on a 1 100 scale, where anything 90 above would be essentially an A. The CCRPI is a more comprehensive measure than traditional testing because student achievement on high-stakes test like the CRCT (Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests) comprises only a part of the score (but the majority of the score). Other factors like student growth on tests and how well schools are doing in narrowing the so-called achievement gaps are also calculated in the Index. Finally, there are also bonus points that schools can earn based on a number of factors, including levels of economic disadvantage, special education students, to name a few. (These bonus points could push a school s score above 100). The next few slides show the CCRPI scores for schools districts at three levels of schools: Elementary, Middle and High School. We also show the spatial distribution of school level scores. Please click here (or the linked text above) to get more information about how the CCRPI was developed.

CCRPI: Elementary Schools 100 90 80 87.2 86.9 85.1 83.2 81.2 80.6 70 78.1 78.1 77.8 77.6 76.7 60 67.2 67.1 62.9 50 40 30 20 10 0 Decatur Fayette Gwinnett Buford Marietta Cobb Henry Douglas Fulton Rockdale Cherokee Clayton Atlanta DeKalb 2013 CCRPI SCORE The CCRPI scores for elementary schools in the 10-county Atlanta region range from a high of 87.2 in the city of Decatur schools, to a low of 62.9 in DeKalb County schools. Naturally, the levels of economic disadvantage play a role in these scores, and Decatur and Fayette have the two lowest levels of economic disadvantage in the region, while DeKalb, Clayton and Atlanta city have among the highest.

CCRPI: Middle Schools 100 90 80 70 60 50 90.3 88.4 87 86.2 84 83.5 82.9 79.7 76.6 74.6 73.9 68.1 65.4 59.9 40 30 20 10 0 Decatur Fayette Buford Gwinnett Marietta Cherokee Cobb Henry Rockdale Fulton Douglas Clayton Atlanta 2013 CCRPI SCORE DeKalb The CCRPI scores for middle schools in the 10-county Atlanta region range from a high of 90.3 in the city of Decatur schools, to a low of 59.9 in DeKalb County schools. Again, the levels of economic disadvantage play a role in these scores, and Decatur and Fayette have the two lowest levels of economic disadvantage in the region, while DeKalb, Clayton and Atlanta city have among the highest.

CCRPI: High Schools 100 90 80 70 60 50 92.5 88.4 82 80.3 77.6 77.4 74.9 70.5 70.5 70.4 69.9 62 59.2 58.6 40 30 20 10 0 Buford Decatur Fayette Cherokee Fulton Cobb Gwinnett Henry Marietta 2013 CCRPI SCORE Douglas Rockdale DeKalb Atlanta Clayton The CCRPI scores for high schools in the 10-county Atlanta region range from a high of 92.5 in the city of Buford schools, to a low of 58.6 in Clayton County schools. In Buford, 50 percent of the district s students are economically disadvantaged, yet the district has the highest overall CCRPI score. Still, as with other levels of schools, economic disadvantage is a key determinant in student achievement (which is a key component of the CCRPI), and we will explore this relationship in greater depth in subsequent slides.

The Geography of CCRPI Scores: Elementary Schools (2013) This shows the CCRPI score for elementary schools in the region. The blues represent those with the highest scores; the browns represent those with the lowest scores. There is a definite spatial pattern to student achievement, but since the CCRPI does better reflect some of the economic realties of students, the pattern isn t as strong as with mapping student achievement alone, which we do in subsequent slides.

The Geography of CCRPI Scores: Middle Schools (2013) This shows the CCRPI score for middle schools in the region. The blues represent those with the highest scores; the browns represent those with the lowest scores. There is a definite spatial pattern to student achievement, but since the CCRPI does better reflect some of the economic realties of students, the pattern isn t as strong as with mapping student achievement alone, which we do in subsequent slides.

The Geography of CCRPI Scores: High Schools (2013) This shows the CCRPI score for high schools in the region. The blues represent those with the highest scores; the browns represent those with the lowest scores. There is a definite spatial pattern to student achievement, but since the CCRPI does better reflect some of the economic realties of students, the pattern isn t as strong as with mapping student achievement alone, which we do in subsequent slides.

2013 CRCT Results: 3 rd Grade Reading

3 rd Grade Reading: All Students 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Decatur Fayette Cherokee Cobb Fulton Gwinnett Buford Henry Douglas Marietta Rockdale DeKalb Atlanta Clayton % Does not Meet % Meets % Exceeds Being able to read at grade level in 3 rd grade is a key indicator of future success. According to research commissioned by the Annie E. Casey Foundation, students who don't read proficiently by the end of third grade are four times more likely to drop out of high school compared to proficient readers. of Decatur has the highest percentage of students who exceeded the reading standard for the 3 rd grade CRCT at 86 percent. Note that the of Decatur Schools also has the lowest percentage of students who are classified as economically disadvantaged (see Slide 3).

90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 3 rd Grade Reading: Comparing Economically Disadvantaged to Non-Economically Disadvantaged (10-County Area Aggregated) % Does not Meet % Meets % Exceeds Economically Disadvantaged Non-Economically Disadvantaged This chart compares the 3 rd grade reading CRCT results of students who are considered to be economically disadvantaged to those who are not economically disadvantaged. Instead of looking at this by school district, here we aggregate the results to the entire 10-county area. As can be seen, there is a significant gap in the exceeds rate between the economically disadvantaged and the non-economically disadvantaged. While 39 percent of the economically disadvantaged students exceeded the standard for 3 rd grade reading, almost 77 percent of the noneconomically disadvantaged exceeded the standard, an achievement gap of 38 percentage points.

3 rd Grade Reading: Percent Exceeds Standard This shows the percentage of students who exceeded the standard on the 3 rd grade reading portion of the CRCT (Criterion Referenced Competency Test). The blues show the school with the highest percentages; the browns show the school with the lowest percentages. There is a definite spatial pattern to student achievement.

More Spatial Relationships! What are these two maps depicting? Are they the same map?

Student Achievement and Economic Disadvantage Exceed Rate 3 rd grade reading (Blues are highest) Economic Disadvantage (Blues are lowest)

Student Achievement and Economic Disadvantage Exceed Rate 3 rd grade reading (Blues are highest) Economic Disadvantage (Blues are lowest) The map on the left shows the highest performing schools (in blue) on the on 3 rd grade reading portion of the CRCT. The map on the right shows the schools with the lowest levels of economic disadvantage (in blue). The maps are almost identical. But, of course, there are some schools with high levels of economic disadvantage that perform well, and vice versa. (This spatial pattern holds true regardless of school level, so we won t show maps for middle and high schools.)

2013 CRCT Results: 8 th Grade Math

8 th Grade Math: All Students 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Buford Fayette Gwinnett Cherokee Decatur Cobb Fulton Henry Rockdale Douglas Atlanta Marietta DeKalb Clayton % Does not Meet % Meets % Exceeds Along with 3 rd grade reading, 8 th grade math is a key indicator of future academic success. (See one source here that pegs 8 th grade math proficiency as one of 10 key indicators of academic and overall youth success.) Buford schools has the highest percentage of students exceeding the math standard for the 8 th grade CRCT at 57 percent.

8 th Grade Math: Comparing Economically Disadvantaged to Non-Economically Disadvantaged (10-County Area Aggregated) 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% % Does not Meet % Meets % Exceeds Economically Disadvantaged Non-Economically Disadvantaged This chart compares the 8th grade math CRCT results of students who are considered to be economically disadvantaged to those who are not economically disadvantaged. Instead of looking at this by school district, here we aggregate the results to the entire 10-county area. As can be seen, there is a significant gap in the exceeds rate between the economically disadvantaged and the non-economically disadvantaged. While only 21 percent of the economically disadvantaged students exceeded the standard for 8 th grade math, almost 54 percent of the non-economically disadvantaged exceeded the standard, an achievement gap of 33 percentage points.

8 th Grade Math: Percent Exceeds Standard This shows the percentage of students who exceeded the standard on the 8th grade math portion of the CRCT (Criterion Referenced Competency Test). The blues show the schools with the highest percentages; the browns show the school with the lowest percentages. There is a definite spatial pattern to student achievement. And like the 3 rd grade reading series of maps, a map of high rates of economic disadvantage by school would look similar.

Graduation Rates

High School Graduation Rate, 2013 100 90 80 93.9 90.3 87.3 70 60 50 78.5 78 78 76.5 75.5 72.7 70.5 66.2 58.9 58.6 55.8 40 30 20 10 0 Decatur Buford Fayette Henry Cherokee Rockdale Cobb Fulton Gwinnett Douglas Marietta DeKalb Atlanta Clayton As with other measures of student achievement, high school graduation rates also are correlated with economic disadvantaged levels. This chart shows the Decatur city schools have the highest graduation rate (94 percent in 2013) in the 10-county region, but, remember, it also had the lowest percentage of students who are classified as economically disadvantaged.

Geography of High School Graduation Rates (2013) This shows the graduation rates for high schools in the region. The blues represent those with the highest rates; the browns represent those with the lowest rates. There is a definite spatial pattern to graduation rates as well.

Attendance Rates

Attendance by School District 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 % 5 days abesent or fewer % 6 to 15 days absent % more than 15 days absent Obviously, attendance is a key indicator of student and school success, yet absenteeism still does not have as strong of a correlation to student achievement as does economic disadvantage. This chart shows that Buford schools has the best attendance outcomes in the 10-county region, with some 66 percent of students missing fewer than five days. Buford also does well among other measures of student success (like CCRT scores, CCRPI, and graduation rates). But other school districts notably Decatur and Fayette County have poorer attendance outcomes, yet still their students achieve at high levels.

The map on the left shows the highest performing schools (in blue) on the on 3 rd grade reading portion of the CRCT. The map on the right shows the schools with the best attendance outcomes (the schools with the highest of percentages of those missing fewer than five days are in blue). Unlike the previous maps that compared 3 rd grade reading to levels of economic disadvantage, there isn t as strong of a spatial correlation between attendance and 3 rd grade reading. This isn t to say that attendance plays no role in student achievement, as there is still a correlation with high achieving schools, at least among elementary schools. Student Achievement and Attendance (Elementary) Exceed Rate 3 rd grade reading (Blues are highest) Attendance (Blues have best attendance outcomes)

Student Achievement and Attendance (High) Graduation Rate, High School (Blues are highest) Attendance (Blues have best attendance outcomes) The map on the left shows the highest performing high schools (in blue) in terms of graduation rates. The map on the right shows the schools with the best attendance outcomes (the schools with the highest of percentages of those missing fewer than five days are in blue). Here there is a stronger spatial correlation between attendance and graduation rates than what was observed when comparing elementary school attendance outcomes with student achievement.