Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools

Similar documents
Shelters Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Kahului Elementary School

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Educational Attainment

Raw Data Files Instructions

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

John F. Kennedy Middle School

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10


State of New Jersey

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Hokulani Elementary School

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Bellehaven Elementary

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

University of Arizona

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

African American Success Initiative

Updated: December Educational Attainment

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

12-month Enrollment

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Hitchcock Independent School District. District Improvement Plan

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Best Colleges Main Survey

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

El Toro Elementary School

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

Financing Education In Minnesota

Idaho Public Schools

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

SAN JACINTO COLLEGE JOB DESCRIPTION

African American Male Achievement Update

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

PEIMS Submission 1 list

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

School Action Plan: Template Overview

46 Children s Defense Fund

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Conroe Independent School District

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

Rural Education in Oregon

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

Transcription:

Texas Education Agency 2014-15 Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools Campus Name: LOMETA SCHOOL Campus ID: 141902001 District Name: LOMETA ISD Part I: Student Achievement by Proficiency Level This section provides the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) performance results for each subject area and grade level tested in the 2014-15 school year. These results include all students tested, whether or not they were in the accountability subset. African American Pacific Two or More Special Econ StateDistrictCampus AmericanHispanicWhite Indian AsianIslander Races Ed DisadvELL Female Male Migrant STAAR Percent at Phase-in 1 Level II or Above Grade 3 Reading 2015 74% 62% 62% - 62% 63% - - - - - 56% * 67% * * 2014 75% 67% 67% - 55% 86% - - - - * 64% * 71% 64% - Mathematics2015 74% 57% 57% - 54% 63% - - - - - 56% * 73% * * 2014 69% 50% 50% - * 86% - - - - * 50% * * 55% - Grade 4 Reading 2015 71% * * - * * - - - - - * - * * - 2014 73% 61% 61% - 50% 75% - - - - * 55% * 55% 65% * Mathematics2015 71% * * - * * - - - - - * - * * - 2014 70% 43% 43% - 50% * - - - - * 50% * 45% 41% * Writing 2015 67% * * - * * - - - - - * - * * - 2014 72% 61% 61% - 63% 58% - - - - * 59% * 73% 53% * Grade 5 Reading 2015 83% 66% 66% - 63% 75% - - - * * 55% * 57% 73% * 2014 86% 50% 50% - * 86% - * - * * 43% * * 50% * Mathematics2015 75% 59% 59% - 63% 58% - - - * * 55% * 57% 60% * 2014 87% 67% 67% - * 100% - * - * * 64% * * 75% * Science 2015 69% 38% 38% - 31% 50% - - - * * * * * 53% * 2014 73% 53% 53% - * 100% - * - * * 46% * * 55% * Grade 6 Reading 2015 73% 71% 71% - 71% 86% - * - * * 69% * 88% 56% * 2014 77% 88% 88% - 88% 93% * * - * - 92% - 100% 67% * Mathematics2015 72% 59% 59% - * 86% - * - * * 54% * 63% 56% * 2014 78% 72% 72% - 63% 71% * * - * - 54% - 88% * * Grade 7 Reading 2015 72% 73% 73% - * 77% * * - * * 73% - 79% 63% * 2014 74% 72% 72% - * 82% - - - - * 62% * 100% 55% * Mathematics2015 68% 71% 71% - * 75% * * - * * 70% - 86% * * 2014 67% 56% 56% - * 64% - - - - * 46% * 71% 45% * Writing 2015 69% 77% 77% - 83% 69% * * - * * 73% - 93% * * 2014 70% 61% 61% - * 64% - - - - * 46% * 100% * * Grade 8

Reading 2015 84% 65% 65% - * 82% - - - - * 50% * 100% * * 2014 88% 89% 89% - * 100% - - - * * 85% * 100% 85% * Mathematics2015 71% 72% 72% - 83% 67% - - - - * 69% * 71% 73% * 2014 85% 94% 94% - * 100% - - - * * 92% * 100% 92% * Science 2015 67% 65% 65% - * 82% - - - - * 50% * 71% 60% * 2014 70% 59% 59% - * 73% - - - * * 42% * * 50% * Social Studies 2015 61% 47% 47% - * 55% - - - - * * * * 50% * 2014 61% 59% 59% - * 64% - - - * * 42% * * 58% * End of Course English I 2015 66% 60% 60% - 50% 69% - - - * * 56% * 73% 53% * 2014 65% 73% 73% * 59% 94% - - - * 83% 61% * 89% 57% * English II 2015 69% 59% 59% - 53% 69% - - - - * 38% * 75% 44% * 2014 68% 74% 74% - 58% 100% - * - * * 60% * 75% 73% * Algebra I 2015 77% 89% 89% - * 100% - - - * * 87% * 88% 91% * 2014 79% 100% 100% * 100% 100% - - - * 100% 100% * 100% 100% * Biology 2015 88% 95% 95% - 86% 100% - - - * * 93% * 100% 92% * 2014 88% 94% 94% * 88% 100% - - - - * 91% * 94% 94% * U.S. History 2015 88% 81% 81% * 78% 88% - * - - * 72% * 75% 86% * 2014 92% 82% 82% - 67% 100% - - - - - 83% - 78% 88% - All Grades All Subjects 2015 73% 64% 64% * 54% 73% * * - 54% 24% 55% 40% 71% 56% 61% 2014 75% 70% 70% * 58% 82% * * - 69% 67% 64% 33% 79% 64% 66% Reading 2015 74% 62% 62% - 53% 73% * * - * * 52% 32% 74% 49% 63% 2014 75% 72% 72% * 56% 90% * * - 56% 68% 64% * 82% 64% 50% Mathematics2015 73% 64% 64% - 55% 73% * * - * * 60% 53% 73% 55% 77% 2014 76% 69% 69% * 60% 77% * * - 75% 75% 66% 43% 75% 65% 69% Writing 2015 68% 62% 62% - 50% 65% * * - * * 50% - 83% 38% * 2014 71% 61% 61% - 61% 61% - - - - * 54% * 83% 46% * Science 2015 75% 62% 62% - 45% 76% - - - * * 51% * 54% 68% * 2014 77% 75% 75% * 59% 91% - * - * 63% 67% * 82% 69% 71% Social Studies 2015 74% 71% 71% * 69% 75% - * - - * 57% * 67% 75% * 2014 75% 71% 71% - 50% 79% - - - * * 63% * 71% 70% * STAAR Percent at Final Level II or Above All Grades All Subjects 2015 38% 29% 29% * 13% 44% * * - 31% 0% 19% 4% 33% 24% 32% 2014 39% 29% 29% * 12% 44% * * - 27% 39% 19% 0% 31% 27% 22% Reading 2015 40% 31% 31% - 15% 48% * * - * * 22% 0% 36% 25% 38% 2014 42% 32% 32% * 10% 52% * * - 33% 37% 20% * 39% 28% 29% Mathematics2015 36% 26% 26% - 13% 40% * * - * * 20% 12% 30% 22% 31% 2014 37% 27% 27% * 12% 41% * * - 38% 50% 20% 0% 29% 26% 23% Writing 2015 31% 26% 26% - 0% 47% * * - * * 14% - 39% 13% * 2014 34% 9% 9% - 13% 4% - - - - * 9% * 11% 7% * Science 2015 40% 22% 22% - 7% 32% - - - * * 15% * 25% 19% * 2014 40% 39% 39% * 15% 63% - * - * 38% 23% * 36% 41% 29% Social

Studies 2015 41% 37% 37% * 17% 57% - * - - * 14% * 37% 38% * 2014 38% 21% 21% - 8% 32% - - - * * 8% * 14% 25% * STAAR Percent at Level III Advanced All Grades All Subjects 2015 14% 8% 8% * 4% 11% * * - 0% 0% 4% 0% 8% 7% 5% 2014 14% 9% 9% * 2% 14% * * - 15% 8% 5% 0% 7% 10% 5% Reading 2015 15% 8% 8% - 5% 11% * * - * * 5% 0% 11% 4% 6% 2014 14% 9% 9% * 2% 13% * * - 22% 11% 5% * 10% 8% 14% Mathematics2015 14% 6% 6% - 6% 6% * * - * * 5% 0% 6% 6% 8% 2014 15% 12% 12% * 3% 20% * * - 13% 6% 5% 0% 9% 14% 0% Writing 2015 8% 9% 9% - 0% 18% * * - * * 5% - 11% 6% * 2014 6% 2% 2% - 4% 0% - - - - * 3% * 0% 4% * Science 2015 14% 3% 3% - 0% 6% - - - * * 0% * 0% 5% * 2014 13% 9% 9% * 0% 16% - * - * 0% 4% * 0% 15% 0% Social Studies 2015 18% 15% 15% * 3% 29% - * - - * 0% * 11% 19% * 2014 15% 6% 6% - 0% 11% - - - * * 0% * 0% 10% * STAAR Participation (All Grades) All Tests 2015 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2014 99% 100% 100% - 100% 100% * 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Reading 2015 99% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2014 99% 100% 100% - 100% 100% * * - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Mathematics 2015 99% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2014 99% 100% 100% - 100% 100% * * - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Writing 2015 99% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 2014 99% 100% 100% - 100% 100% - - - - * 100% * 100% 100% * Science 2015 99% 100% 100% - 100% 100% - - - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2014 99% 99% 99% - 100% 97% - * - 100% 100% 98% 100% 100% 97% 100% Social Studies 2015 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% - - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2014 99% 100% 100% - 100% 100% - - - * * 100% * 100% 100% * STAAR Participation Results by Assessment Type for Students Served in Special Education Settings (All Grades) Reading Tests % of Participants 2015 98% 100% 100% - * 100% - * - * 100% 100% - * 100% - % STAAR/EOC With No Accommodations 2015 17% 0% 0% - * 0% - * - * 0% 0% - * 0% - % STAAR/EOC With Accommodations 2015 71% 100% 100% - * 100% - * - * 100% 100% - * 100% - % STAAR Alternate2 2015 10% 0% 0% - * 0% - * - * 0% 0% - * 0% - % of Non-Participants 2015 2% 0% 0% - * 0% - * - * 0% 0% - * 0% - Mathematics Tests % of Participants 2015 99% 100% 100% - * * - * - * 100% 100% - * 100% - % STAAR/EOC With No Accommodations 2015 13% 0% 0% - * * - * - * 0% 0% - * 0% - % STAAR/EOC With Accommodations 2015 74% 100% 100% - * * - * - * 100% 100% - * 100% - % STAAR Alternate2 2015 11% 0% 0% - * * - * - * 0% 0% - * 0% - % of Non-Participants 2015 1% 0% 0% - * * - * - * 0% 0% - * 0% -

'?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group. Part II: Student Achievement and State Academic Annual Measureable Objectives (AMOs) This section provides the STAAR performance results for each subject area tested in the 2014-15 school year. These results only include tested students who were in the accountability subset. This section also includes four-year and five-year graduation rates and participation rates on STAAR for reading and mathematics. All African Students American Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Econ Disadv Special Ed ELL (Current & Monitored) ELL + White Asian Performance Status Target 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% Reading N N N n/a n/a n/a n/a N n/a Mathematics N N N n/a n/a n/a n/a N n/a Participation Status Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% Reading Y Y Y n/a n/a n/a n/a Y n/a Y Mathematics Y Y Y n/a n/a n/a n/a Y n/a Federal Graduation Status (Target: See Reason Codes) Graduation Target Y n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Met Reason Code *** a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading Alternate 1% Number Proficient Total Federal Cap Limit Mathematics Alternate 1% Number Proficient Total Federal Cap Limit ' ' Results for grade 3-8 mathematics, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate 2 are included in 2015 Federal System Safeguards. '+' Participation uses ELL (Current) rate, Graduation uses ELL (Ever HS) rate '***' Federal Graduation Rate Reason Codes: a = Graduation Rate Goal of 90% b = Four-year Graduation Rate Target of 83% c = Safe Harbor Target of a 10% decrease in difference from the prior year rate and the goal d = Five-year Graduation Rate Target of 88% Blank cells above represent student group indicators that do not meet the minimum size criteria. 'n/a' Indicates data are not applicable to this report. Performance Rates All African Students American Hispanic White American Indian Pacific Two or More Econ Asian Islander Races Disadv Special Ed ELL (Current & ELL Monitored) (Current) Reading # at Phase-in Satisfactory 107-49 54 * * - * 64 * 12 n/a

Total Tests 160-82 70 * * - * 111 * 20 18 % at Phase-in Satisfactory 67% - 60% 77% * * - * 58% * 60% n/a Mathematics # at Phase-in Satisfactory 80-31 44 * * - * 52 * 10 n/a Total Tests 119-54 57 * * - * 82 * 13 11 % at Phase-in Satisfactory 67% - 57% 77% * * - * 63% * 77% n/a Writing # at Phase-in Satisfactory 19-7 9 * * - * 10 - - n/a Total Tests 30-14 13 * * - * 20 - - - % at Phase-in Satisfactory 63% - 50% 69% * * - * 50% - - n/a Science # at Phase-in Satisfactory 37 - ** 25 - - - * 21 * * n/a Total Tests 56 - ** 30 - - - * 38 * * * % at Phase-in Satisfactory 66% - 46% 83% - - - * 55% * * n/a Social Studies # at Phase-in Satisfactory 42-22 ** - * - - 21 * 5 n/a Total Tests 55-28 ** - * - - 33 * 5 5 % at Phase-in Satisfactory 76% - 79% 77% - * - - 64% * 100% n/a Participation Rates Reading: 2014-2015 Assessments Number Participating 180-91 81 * * - 5 129 13 n/a 25 Total Students 180-91 81 * * - 5 129 13 n/a 25 Participation Rate 100% - 100% 100% * * - 100% 100% 100% n/a 100% Mathematics: 2014-2015 Assessments Number Participating 137-62 67 * * - 5 98 9 n/a 17 Total Students 137-62 67 * * - 5 98 9 n/a 17 Participation Rate 100% - 100% 100% * * - 100% 100% 100% n/a 100% ' ' Results for grade 3-8 mathematics, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate 2 are included in 2015 Federal System Safeguards. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '**' When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked (regardless of size). '-' Indicates there are no students in the group. 'n/a' Indicates data are not applicable to this report. Two or More Races All African American Pacific Econ Special ELL Students American Hispanic White Indian Asian Islander Disadv Ed (Current) Federal Graduation Rates 4-year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2014 Number Graduated 18 - ** 11 - * - - 12 * * n/a Total in Class 19 - ** 11 - * - - 13 * * * Graduation Rate 94.7% - 85.7% 100.0% - * - - 92.3% * * n/a 4-year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2013 Number Graduated 20-10 8 - * - * 12 * * n/a Total in Class 20-10 8 - * - * 12 * * * Graduation Rate 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% - * - * 100.0% * * n/a 5-year Extended Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2013 Number Graduated 21-11 8 - * - * 13 * * n/a Total in Class 21-11 8 - * - * 13 * * * Graduation Rate 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% - * - * 100.0% * * n/a District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading ELL (Ever HS)

Number Proficient n/a Total Federal Cap n/a Limit Mathematics Number Proficient n/a Total Federal Cap n/a Limit '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '**' When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked (regardless of size). '-' Indicates there are no students in the group. 'n/a' Indicates data are not applicable to this report. Source: 2015 Accountability Federal System Safeguards Report Part III: Priority and Focus Schools Priority schools are the lowest 5% of Title I served campuses based on performance in reading, mathematics and graduation rates. Priority schools include Tier I or Tier II TTIPS schools, campuses with graduation rates less than 60%, and lowest achieving campuses based on All Students reading/math performance.focus schools are 10% of Title I served campuses, not already identified as priority schools, that have the widest gaps between student group performance and safeguard targets. Campuses are ranked based on the largest gaps between student group reading/math performance and the annual measurable objectives (AMO) target of 75%. Priority School Identification: No Focus School Identification: No Priority School Reason: N/A Focus School Reason: N/A A high-performance reward school is identified as a Title I school with distinctions based on reading and math performance. In addition, at the high school level, a reward school is a Title I school with the highest graduation rates. A high progress school is identified as a Title I school in the top 25% in annual improvement; and/or a school in the top 25% of those demonstrating ability to close performance gaps based on system safeguards. High Performing School: No High Progress School: No Source: TEA Division of School Improvement and Support Part IV: Teacher Quality Data Part IV A: Percent of Teachers by Highest Degree Held Professional qualifications of all public elementary and secondary school teachers in the State of Texas. The distribution of degrees attained by teachers are shown as the percent of total Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) count of teachers with no degree, bachelor s, master s, and doctorate degrees. ----------------- Campus ----------------- Number Percent District Percent State Percent No Degree 0.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% Bachelors 21.6 82.3% 82.3% 75.1% Masters 4.7 17.7% 17.7% 23.4% Doctorate 0.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.6%

Part IV B and C: Teachers with Emergency/Provisional Credentials, Highly Qualified (HQ) Teachers Low Poverty/ High Poverty Summary Reports The percentage of all public elementary and secondary school teachers teaching with emergency or provisional credentials, and the percentage of classes in the state not taught by highly qualified teachers disaggregated by high-poverty compared to lowpoverty schools. For this purpose, high-poverty means schools in the top quartile of poverty and low-poverty means the bottom quartile of poverty in the state. High Poverty Core Academic Subject Areas General Education Special Education Total Total Number of Teachers 24 1 25 Total Number of Classes 93 5 98 Number of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Number 93 5 98 Percent 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Number of Classes Taught by Not Highly Qualified Teachers Number 0 0 0 Percent 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Number of Core Academic Teachers Who Are Teaching on the Following Permits ------------ Number of Teachers -------- ---- Elem (PK-6) secondary (7-12) Emergency (for certified personnel) 0 0 Emergency (for uncertified personnel) 0 0 Non-renewable 0 0 Temporary Classroom Assignment 0 0 District Teaching 0 0 Temporary 0 0 Number of Core Academic Teachers with a Probationary Certificate Enrolled in an Alternative Certification ------------ Number of Teachers ------------ General Education Special Education Highly Qualified 1 0 Not Highly Qualified 0 0 Source: TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy Part V: Graduates Enrolled in Texas Institution of Higher Education (IHE) This section provides the percentage of students who enroll and begin instruction at an institution of higher education in the school year (fall or spring semester) following high school graduation. The rate reflects the percent of total graduates during the 2011-12 school year who attended a public or independent college or university in Texas in the 2012-13 academic year. Year Enrolled in Higher Education Campus District State

2012-13 36.4% 36.4% 56.9% 2011-12 35.3% 35.3% 57.3% Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Part VI: Statewide National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Results The most recent NAEP results for Texas are provided showing statewide reading and mathematics performance results and participation rates, disaggregated by student group. State Level: 2015 Percentages at NAEP Achievement Levels % At or Above Basic % At or Above Proficient % At or Above Advanced Grade Subject Student Group % Below Basic Grade 4 Reading Overall 36 64 31 7 American Indian n/a n/a n/a n/a Asian 13 87 66 30 Black 49 51 17 2 Hispanic 44 56 22 3 White 18 82 50 13 Students with Disabilities 71 29 11 2 English Language Learners 59 41 12 2 National School Lunch Program 46 54 20 3 Mathematics Overall 14 86 44 8 American Indian n/a n/a n/a n/a Asian 3 97 82 36 Black 24 76 29 2 Hispanic 16 84 37 4 White 7 93 60 15 Students with Disabilities 41 59 18 2 English Language Learners 23 77 28 2 National School Lunch Program 19 81 30 2 Grade 8 Reading Overall 28 72 28 2 American Indian n/a n/a n/a n/a Asian 12 88 55 12 Black 38 62 19 2 Hispanic 35 65 19 1 White 14 86 43 4 Students with Disabilities 70 30 5 n/a English Language Learners 71 29 2 n/a National School Lunch Program 36 64 18 1 Mathematics Overall 25 75 32 7 American Indian n/a n/a n/a n/a Asian 5 95 67 25 Black 43 57 16 2 Hispanic 31 69 23 4 White 12 88 48 12 Students with Disabilities 62 38 8 1 English Language Learners 60 40 6 n/a National School Lunch Program 34 66 20 3 State Level: 2015 Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and Limited English Proficient Students Grade Subject Student Group % Grade 4 Reading Students with Disabilities 72 Limited English Proficient 92

Mathematics Students with Disabilities 80 Limited English Proficient 95 Grade 8 Reading Students with Disabilities 81 Limited English Proficient 95 Mathematics Students with Disabilities 81 Limited English Proficient 90 Source: TEA Division of Student Assessment