Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools

Similar documents
Shelters Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Cooper Upper Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Kahului Elementary School

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Educational Attainment

Raw Data Files Instructions

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Hokulani Elementary School

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P


State of New Jersey

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Best Colleges Main Survey

Bellehaven Elementary

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

University of Arizona

African American Success Initiative

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

Updated: December Educational Attainment

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

12-month Enrollment

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Financing Education In Minnesota

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Hitchcock Independent School District. District Improvement Plan

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

El Toro Elementary School

PEIMS Submission 1 list

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

Idaho Public Schools

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Rural Education in Oregon

SAN JACINTO COLLEGE JOB DESCRIPTION

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

African American Male Achievement Update

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Transportation Equity Analysis

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Apply Texas. Tracking Student Progress

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Transcription:

Texas Education Agency 2015-16 Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools Campus Name: COOPER H S Campus ID: 221901002 District Name: ABILENE ISD Print this report Part I: Student Achievement by Proficiency Level This section provides the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) performance results for each subject area and grade level tested in the 2015-16 school year. These results include all students tested, whether or not they were in the accountability subset. African American Pacific Two or More Special State District Campus American Hispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Ed STAAR Percent At or Above Level II Satisfactory (2016) or Phase-in 1 Level II (2015) Econ Disadv ELL Female Male Migrant End of Course English I 2016 63% 63% 59% 48% 57% 65% * 33% - 77% 26% 53% 18% 68% 51% - 2015 66% 65% 62% 52% 60% 68% * 45% - 58% 27% 56% 30% 70% 54% - English II 2016 66% 68% 68% 58% 64% 77% * 46% - 74% 31% 62% 29% 76% 61% - 2015 69% 67% 63% 45% 62% 70% * 50% - 80% 27% 55% 26% 64% 62% - Algebra I 2016 76% 79% 66% 60% 62% 72% * 57% - 82% 31% 62% 34% 70% 62% - 2015 77% 80% 70% 56% 68% 77% * 68% - 63% 44% 67% 47% 70% 69% - Biology 2016 86% 86% 84% 82% 81% 87% * 63% - 93% 43% 79% 41% 84% 83% - 2015 88% 87% 88% 85% 84% 91% * 84% - 95% 49% 84% 66% 91% 85% - U.S. History 2016 90% 87% 86% 81% 82% 90% * 82% - 83% 54% 82% 62% 85% 86% - 2015 88% 89% 87% 87% 85% 91% * 74% - 92% 58% 84% 69% 85% 90% - All Grades All Subjects 2016 74% 71% 73% 65% 70% 80% 72% 59% - 82% 38% 67% 36% 77% 70% - 2015 73% 72% 73% 63% 70% 78% 88% 64% - 78% 39% 67% 44% 76% 70% - Reading 2016 72% 70% 63% 53% 60% 71% 63% 41% - 76% 28% 57% 23% 72% 56% - 2015 74% 72% 62% 49% 61% 69% * 48% - 66% 27% 55% 28% 67% 58% - Mathematics 2016 75% 74% 66% 60% 62% 72% * 57% - 82% 31% 62% 34% 70% 62% - 2015 73% 74% 70% 56% 68% 77% * 68% - 63% 44% 67% 47% 70% 69% - Science 2016 77% 74% 84% 82% 81% 87% * 63% - 93% 43% 79% 41% 84% 83% - 2015 75% 75% 88% 85% 84% 91% * 84% - 95% 49% 84% 66% 91% 85% - Social Studies 2016 76% 74% 86% 81% 82% 90% * 82% - 83% 54% 82% 62% 85% 86% - 2015 74% 72% 87% 87% 85% 91% * 74% - 92% 58% 84% 69% 85% 90% - STAAR Percent at Final Level II or Above All Grades All Subjects 2016 42% 38% 42% 30% 36% 50% 61% 29% - 55% 14% 35% 10% 44% 40% - 2015 38% 36% 39% 26% 35% 47% 88% 31% - 44% 16% 31% 9% 41% 38% - Reading 2016 42% 38% 38% 28% 33% 46% 50% 22% - 50% 11% 31% 1% 46% 30% - 2015 40% 38% 38% 26% 34% 46% * 28% - 44% 15% 29% 6% 44% 34% - Mathematics 2016 40% 36% 21% 14% 21% 21% * 14% - 45% 8% 20% 5% 22% 19% - 2015 36% 35% 16% 11% 14% 20% * 8% - 6% 13% 13% 0% 17% 15% - Science 2016 44% 39% 51% 39% 47% 58% * 25% - 72% 15% 44% 7% 54% 49% -

2015 40% 38% 47% 27% 42% 57% * 31% - 55% 18% 38% 3% 45% 49% - Social Studies 2016 45% 44% 53% 38% 46% 63% * 44% - 53% 20% 46% 33% 45% 61% - 2015 41% 40% 58% 41% 53% 68% * 59% - 60% 20% 51% 37% 55% 62% - STAAR Percent at Level III Advanced All Grades All Subjects 2016 17% 13% 9% 5% 7% 12% 28% 5% - 12% 4% 6% 1% 8% 10% - 2015 14% 13% 8% 4% 7% 10% 25% 9% - 13% 2% 5% 2% 8% 8% - Reading 2016 16% 13% 3% 3% 3% 5% 0% 2% - 2% 3% 2% 0% 4% 3% - 2015 15% 14% 3% 2% 3% 4% * 1% - 5% 1% 2% 0% 4% 2% - Mathematics 2016 17% 13% 5% 0% 5% 6% * 0% - 14% 5% 5% 0% 7% 4% - 2015 14% 13% 5% 0% 5% 7% * 4% - 0% 0% 2% 0% 6% 4% - Science 2016 15% 11% 10% 5% 6% 14% * 6% - 17% 3% 7% 0% 9% 11% - 2015 14% 12% 13% 9% 10% 16% * 13% - 27% 5% 10% 0% 12% 15% - Social Studies 2016 21% 17% 19% 13% 15% 24% * 10% - 27% 6% 14% 4% 14% 24% - 2015 18% 16% 20% 6% 20% 22% * 26% - 24% 5% 15% 14% 16% 23% - STAAR Participation (All Grades) All Tests 2016 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 2015 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 100% 98% - 100% 99% 99% 94% 99% 99% - Reading 2016 99% 100% 100% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% - 98% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% - 2015 99% 99% 99% 98% 98% 100% 100% 97% - 100% 99% 98% 88% 99% 98% - Mathematics 2016 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% * 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 2015 99% 99% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% - Science 2016 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 2015 99% 99% 99% 100% 99% 99% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 99% 100% 98% 100% - Social Studies 2016 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 2015 99% 99% 99% 100% 99% 99% 100% 96% - 100% 96% 99% 100% 99% 100% - STAAR Participation Results by Assessment Type for Students Served in Special Education Settings (All Grades) Reading Tests % of Participants 2016 98% 99% 99% 100% 98% 100% * - - 100% 99% 100% * 100% 99% - % STAAR/EOC With No Accommodations 2016 13% 10% 4% 13% 2% 5% * - - 0% 4% 4% * 2% 5% - % STAAR/EOC With Accommodations 2016 73% 75% 88% 67% 92% 89% * - - 89% 88% 87% * 96% 84% - % STAAR Alternate2 2016 11% 14% 7% 20% 5% 6% * - - 11% 7% 9% * 2% 10% - % of Non-Participants 2016 2% 1% 1% 0% 2% 0% * - - 0% 1% 0% * 0% 1% - Mathematics Tests % of Participants 2016 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * - - 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100% - % STAAR/EOC With No Accommodations 2016 12% 11% 10% 40% 4% 12% * - - 0% 10% 9% * 12% 8% - % STAAR/EOC With Accommodations 2016 75% 73% 84% 60% 88% 85% * - - 80% 84% 83% * 88% 81% - % STAAR Alternate2 2016 12% 15% 6% 0% 8% 4% * - - 20% 6% 9% * 0% 11% - % of Non-Participants 2016 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% * - - 0% 0% 0% * 0% 0% - '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.

'-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. Part II: Student Achievement and State Academic Annual Measureable Objectives (AMOs) This section provides the STAAR performance results for each subject area tested in the 2015-16 school year. These results only include tested students who were in the accountability subset. This section also includes four-year and five-year graduation rates and participation rates on STAAR for reading and mathematics. All African American Pacific Two or More Econ ELL Special (Current & ELL Total Total Percent of Eligible Measures StudentsAmericanHispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Ed Monitored) + Met Eligible Met Performance Status - State State Target 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% Reading Y N Y Y Y Y N N 5 8 63 Mathematics Y Y Y Y Y N 5 6 83 Writing 0 0 Science Y Y Y Y Y N 5 6 83 Social Studies Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N 7 8 88 Total 22 28 79 Performance Status - Federal Federal Target 87% 87% 87% 87% 87% 87% 87% Reading N N N N n/a n/a n/a n/a N N n/a Mathematics N N N N n/a n/a n/a n/a N N n/a Participation Status Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% Reading Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 9 9 100 Mathematics Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 7 7 100 Total 16 16 100 Federal Graduation Status (Target: See Reason Codes) Graduation Target Met Y N Y Y Y N 4 6 67 Reason Code *** a d a d Total 4 6 67 District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading Alternate 1% n/a Number Proficient n/a Total Federal Cap Limit n/a Mathematics Alternate 1% n/a Number Proficient n/a Total Federal Cap Limit n/a Total Overall Total 42 50 84 + Participation uses ELL (Current), Graduation uses ELL (Ever HS) *** Federal Graduation Rate Reason Codes: a = Graduation Rate Goal of 90% c = Safe Harbor Target of a 10% decrease in difference from the prior year rate and the Goal b = Four-year Graduation Rate Target of 88% d = Five-year Graduation Rate Target of 90% Blank cells above represent student group indicators that do not meet the minimum size criteria. n/a Indicates the student group is not applicable to System Safeguards. Performance Rates All Students African American Hispanic White American Indian Asian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Econ Disadv Special Ed ELL (Current & Monitored) ELL (Current)

Reading # at Level II Satisfactory 748 94 272 324 5 14-39 404 42 25 n/a Total Tests 1,129 160 438 448 8 22-53 666 146 63 47 % at Level II Satisfactory 66% 59% 62% 72% 63% 64% - 74% 61% 29% 40% n/a Mathematics # at Level II Satisfactory 262 42 108 91 * * - 15 164 18 12 n/a Total Tests 384 60 172 126 * * - 18 254 58 23 17 % at Level II Satisfactory 68% 70% 63% 72% * * - 83% 65% 31% 52% n/a Writing # at Level II Satisfactory - - - - - - - - - - - n/a Total Tests - - - - - - - - - - - - % at Level II Satisfactory - - - - - - - - - - - n/a Science # at Level II Satisfactory 398 59 149 159 * ** - 22 220 27 9 n/a Total Tests 461 68 179 180 * ** - 24 267 63 14 10 % at Level II Satisfactory 86% 87% 83% 88% * 83% - 92% 82% 43% 64% n/a Social Studies # at Level II Satisfactory 676 76 219 330 * ** - 25 333 57 22 n/a Total Tests 779 89 268 363 * ** - 30 400 104 31 24 % at Level II Satisfactory 87% 85% 82% 91% * 92% - 83% 83% 55% 71% n/a Participation Rates Reading: 2015-2016 Assessments Number Participating 1,259 193 473 476 8 51-58 774 155 n/a 108 Total Students 1,265 194 476 477 8 51-59 778 155 n/a 108 Participation Rate 100% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% - 98% 99% 100% n/a 100% Mathematics: 2015-2016 Assessments Number Participating 444 72 190 143 * ** - 22 298 62 n/a 38 Total Students 445 73 190 143 * ** - 22 298 62 n/a 38 Participation Rate 100% 99% 100% 100% * 100% - 100% 100% 100% n/a 100% * Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. ** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked (regardless of size). - Indicates there are no students in the group. n/a Indicates the student group is not applicable to System Safeguards. All Students African American Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Econ Disadv Special Ed ELL ELL (Ever HS) (Current) White Asian Federal Graduation Rates 4-year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2015 Number Graduated 359 42 110 171 * 16 * 15 148 52 15 n/a Total in Class 394 48 126 182 * 18 * 15 177 64 17 17 Graduation Rate 91.1% 87.5% 87.3% 94.0% * 88.9% * 100.0% 83.6% 81.3% 88.2% n/a 4-year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2014 Number Graduated 359 42 113 174 * ** - 14 186 66 14 n/a Total in Class 388 47 124 186 * ** - 14 207 79 17 8 Graduation Rate 92.5% 89.4% 91.1% 93.5% * 92.3% - 100.0% 89.9% 83.5% 82.4% n/a 5-year Extended Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2014 Number Graduated 362 42 113 176 * ** - 14 189 68 15 n/a Total in Class 386 48 122 185 * ** - 14 207 79 17 8 Graduation Rate 93.8% 87.5% 92.6% 95.1% * 100.0% - 100.0% 91.3% 86.1% 88.2% n/a District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading

Number Proficient n/a Total Federal Cap Limit n/a Mathematics Number Proficient n/a Total Federal Cap Limit n/a * Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. ** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked (regardless of size). - Indicates there are no students in the group. n/a Indicates the student group is not applicable to System Safeguards. Source: 2016 Accountability System Safeguards Report Part III: Priority and Focus Schools Priority schools are the lowest 5% of Title I served campuses based on performance in reading, mathematics and graduation rates. Priority schools include Tier I or Tier II TTIPS schools, campuses with graduation rates less than 60%, and lowest achieving campuses based on All Students reading/math performance. Focus schools are 10% of Title I served campuses, not already identified as priority schools, that have the widest gaps between student group performance and safeguard targets. Campuses are ranked based on the largest gaps between student group reading/math performance and the annual measurable objectives (AMO) target of 83%. Campuses were originally staged as priority and focus based on data from the 2013 Accountability Reports.Priority and focus schools having improved in performance and are no longer identified as improvement required for the August 2015 and 2016 ratingswill include a "Progress" label. All schools that do not meet that criteria will remain identified as priority or focus. Priority School Identification: NoPriority School Reason: N/A Focus School Reason: N/A Focus School Identification: No A high-performance reward school is identified as a Title I school with distinctions based on reading and math performance. In addition, at the high school level, a reward school is a Title I school with the highest graduation rates. A high progress school is identified as a Title I school in the top 25% in annual improvement; and/or a school in the top 25% of those demonstrating ability to close performance gaps based on system safeguards. The reward school identifications provided are for the 2015-2016 school year.identifications for the 2016-2017 school year are pending. High Performing School: No High Progress School: No Source: TEA Division of School Improvement and Support Part IV: Teacher Quality Data Part IV A: Percent of Teachers by Highest Degree Held Professional qualifications of all public elementary and secondary school teachers in the State of Texas. The distribution of degrees attained by teachers are shown as the percent of total Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) count of teachers with no degree, bachelor s, master s, and doctorate degrees. ----------------- Campus ----------------- Number Percent District Percent State Percent No Degree 0.0 0.0% 0.6% 1.0% Bachelors 96.9 72.7% 79.3% 74.7% Masters 35.1 26.3% 19.7% 23.6% Doctorate 1.4 1.0% 0.4% 0.6% Part IV B and C: Teachers with Emergency/Provisional Credentials, Highly Qualified (HQ) Teachers Low Poverty/ High Poverty

Summary Reports The percentage of all public elementary and secondary school teachers teaching with emergency or provisional credentials, and the percentage of classes in the state not taught by highly qualified teachers disaggregated by high-poverty compared to low-poverty schools. For this purpose, high-poverty means schools in the top quartile of poverty and low-poverty means the bottom quartile of poverty in the state. Core Academic Subject Areas General Special Total Education Education Total Number of Teachers 97 12 109 Total Number of Classes 469 99 568 Number of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Number 469 99 568 Percent 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Number of Classes Taught by Not Highly Qualified Teachers Number 0 0 0 Percent 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Number of Core Academic Teachers Who Are Teaching on the Following Permits ------------ Number of Teachers -------- ---- Elem (PK-6) secondary (7-12) Emergency (for certified personnel) 0 0 Emergency (for uncertified personnel) 0 0 Non-renewable 0 0 Temporary Classroom Assignment 0 0 District Teaching 0 0 Temporary 0 0 Number of Core Academic Teachers with a Probationary Certificate Enrolled in an Alternative Certification ------------ Number of Teachers ------------ General Education Special Education Highly Qualified 3 0 Not Highly Qualified 0 0 Source: TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy Part V: Graduates Enrolled in Texas Institution of Higher Education (IHE) This section provides the percentage of students who enroll and begin instruction at an institution of higher education in the school year (fall or spring semester) following high school graduation. The rate reflects the percent of total graduates during the 2012-13 school year who attended a public or independent college or university in Texas in the 2013-14 academic year. Year Enrolled in Higher Education Campus District State 2013-14 47.0% 49.4% 57.5% 2012-13 47.7% 49.8% 56.9% Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Part VI: Statewide National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Results

The most recent NAEP results for Texas are provided showing statewide reading and mathematics performance results and participation rates, disaggregated by student group. State Level: 2015 Percentages at NAEP Achievement Levels % At or Above Basic % At or Above Proficient % At or Above Advanced Grade Subject Student Group % Below Basic Grade 4 Reading Overall 36 64 31 7 American Indian n/a n/a n/a n/a Asian 13 87 66 30 Black 49 51 17 2 Hispanic 44 56 22 3 White 18 82 50 13 Students with Disabilities 71 29 11 2 English Language Learners 59 41 12 2 National School Lunch Program 46 54 20 3 Mathematics Overall 14 86 44 8 American Indian n/a n/a n/a n/a Asian 3 97 82 36 Black 24 76 29 2 Hispanic 16 84 37 4 White 7 93 60 15 Students with Disabilities 41 59 18 2 English Language Learners 23 77 28 2 National School Lunch Program 19 81 30 2 Grade 8 Reading Overall 28 72 28 2 American Indian n/a n/a n/a n/a Asian 12 88 55 12 Black 38 62 19 2 Hispanic 35 65 19 1 White 14 86 43 4 Students with Disabilities 70 30 5 n/a English Language Learners 71 29 2 n/a National School Lunch Program 36 64 18 1 Mathematics Overall 25 75 32 7 American Indian n/a n/a n/a n/a Asian 5 95 67 25 Black 43 57 16 2 Hispanic 31 69 23 4 White 12 88 48 12 Students with Disabilities 62 38 8 1 English Language Learners 60 40 6 n/a National School Lunch Program 34 66 20 3 State Level: 2015 Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and Limited English Proficient Students Grade Subject Student Group % Grade 4 Reading Students with Disabilities 72 Limited English Proficient 92 Mathematics Students with Disabilities 80 Limited English Proficient 95 Grade 8 Reading Students with Disabilities 81 Limited English Proficient 95 Mathematics Students with Disabilities 81

Limited English Proficient 90 Source: TEA Division of Student Assessment