Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools

Similar documents
Shelters Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Data Diskette & CD ROM

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Kahului Elementary School

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

State of New Jersey

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Hokulani Elementary School

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

Apply Texas. Tracking Student Progress

PEIMS Submission 1 list

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Financing Education In Minnesota

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Educational Attainment

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

African American Success Initiative

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

SAN JACINTO COLLEGE JOB DESCRIPTION

Raw Data Files Instructions

School Action Plan: Template Overview

Idaho Public Schools

Rural Education in Oregon

FTE General Instructions

African American Male Achievement Update

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

NCEO Technical Report 27


Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Texas Bioscience Institute Educating Scientists For The Future. Nelda Howton

Bellehaven Elementary

State Parental Involvement Plan

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

Conroe Independent School District

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

TK20 FOR STUDENT TEACHERS CONTENTS

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

Jason A. Grissom Susanna Loeb. Forthcoming, American Educational Research Journal

UDW+ Student Data Dictionary Version 1.7 Program Services Office & Decision Support Group

Principal Survey FAQs

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Queens University of Charlotte

Bellevue University Admission Application

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

A Year of Training. A Lifetime of Leadership. Adult Ministries. Master of Arts in Ministry

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Washington Central Supervisory Union. School Report. for East Montpelier Elementary School and U-32. February, 2015

Overview Transmission Dates What s New Contracts and Salaries CPI and PSC Codes Items to Remember Reports

EARNING. THE ACCT 2016 INVITATIONAL SYMPOSIUM: GETTING IN THE FAST LANE Ensuring Economic Security and Meeting the Workforce Needs of the Nation

3.7 General Education Homebound (GEH) Program

AIS/RTI Mathematics. Plainview-Old Bethpage

Transcription:

Part I: Student Achievement by Proficiency Level Texas ucation Agency 2015-16 Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools Campus Name: MANSFIELD TIMBERVIEW H S Campus ID: 220908004 District Name: MANSFIELD ISD This section provides the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) performance results for each subject area and grade level tested in the 2015-16 school year. These results include all students tested, whether or not they were in the accountability subset. State District Campus Hispanic White STAAR Percent Level II Satisfactory Standard (2016) or Phase-in 1 Level II (2015) Disadv Female Male Migrant End of Course English I 2016 63 73 71 68 73 75 * 75 * 84 23 66 37 75 68-2015 66 75 73 71 68 75 * 90 * 81 37 71 50 78 68 - English II 2016 66 76 76 75 72 80 * 82-76 32 71 53 80 72-2015 69 78 73 67 74 79 * 94 * 81 33 68 41 80 66 - Algebra I 2016 76 80 73 69 71 80 * 96 * 83 28 70 63 74 71-2015 77 82 75 71 83 75 * 88-80 41 73 74 72 78 - Biology 2016 86 90 85 82 84 90 * 95 * 91 42 81 69 85 85-2015 88 91 87 85 84 91 * 96-100 54 86 63 87 87 - U.S. History 2016 90 94 93 91 92 98-91 - 100 51 89 77 93 93-2015 88 93 92 90 88 96 * 100 * 100 48 88 76 93 90 - All Grades All Subjects 2016 74 82 79 76 78 84 70 86 * 87 34 74 58 81 77-2015 73 81 79 76 78 82 45 93 * 89 43 77 58 82 77 - Reading 2016 72 81 73 72 73 77 * 79 * 80 27 68 45 77 70-2015 74 83 73 69 71 77 * 92 * 81 36 70 46 79 67 - Mathematics 2016 75 83 73 69 71 80 * 96 * 83 28 70 63 74 71-2015 73 81 75 71 83 75 * 88-80 41 73 74 72 78 - Science 2016 77 83 85 82 84 90 * 95 * 91 42 81 69 85 85-2015 75 79 87 85 84 91 * 96-100 54 86 63 87 87 - Social Studies 2016 76 82 93 91 92 98-91 - 100 51 89 77 93 93-2015 74 81 92 90 88 96 * 100 * 100 48 88 76 93 90 - https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015-16+federal+report+card&_program=perfrept.perfmast.sas&prgopt=20162ff 1/10

State District Campus Hispanic White STAAR Percent at Final Level II or Above Disadv Female Male Migrant All Grades All Subjects 2016 42 51 45 39 42 53 0 66 * 64 11 40 15 45 45-2015 38 46 41 37 37 50 0 64 * 52 18 34 12 43 40 - Reading 2016 42 52 46 41 42 56 * 64 * 61 11 41 12 51 43-2015 40 50 44 41 40 51 * 65 * 55 16 38 14 50 39 - Mathematics 2016 40 48 24 21 24 20 * 48 * 44 5 22 20 25 23-2015 36 43 17 14 15 25 * 38-20 20 15 11 18 17 - Science 2016 44 51 48 41 42 56 * 77 * 64 11 42 11 45 50-2015 40 45 44 40 34 56 * 76-50 16 38 11 44 45 - Social Studies 2016 45 51 58 51 57 67-65 - 87 21 51 23 50 65-2015 41 46 55 51 53 67 * 62 * 64 23 42 12 48 61 - STAAR Percent at Level III Advanced All Grades All Subjects 2016 17 21 8 5 7 12 0 21 * 18 1 6 3 8 8-2015 14 17 8 5 7 11 0 25 * 12 4 6 3 8 8 - Reading 2016 16 21 5 4 3 2 * 14 * 11 1 4 0 7 2-2015 15 20 5 3 4 5 * 20 * 6 2 3 0 7 3 - Mathematics 2016 17 22 5 4 5 8 * 16 * 6 2 3 10 4 7-2015 14 16 5 5 5 4 * 15-0 10 6 5 5 5 - Science 2016 15 17 11 4 7 19 * 30 * 27 0 7 4 10 11-2015 14 16 12 7 8 16 * 35-27 6 10 3 12 12 - Social Studies 2016 21 25 19 11 18 33-39 - 35 0 16 0 12 25-2015 18 18 17 12 16 35 * 31 * 18 3 10 12 11 23 - STAAR Participation (All Grades) All Tests 2016 99 99 99 98 98 99 100 99 100 97 98 98 100 99 98-2015 99 99 98 99 99 96 100 98 100 99 95 98 93 99 98 - Reading 2016 99 99 99 99 99 98 * 98 * 98 99 99 100 99 99-2015 99 99 98 99 98 98 100 97 100 98 94 98 87 98 98 - Mathematics 2016 100 100 98 98 98 98 * 100 * 90 97 98 100 98 98-2015 99 99 99 100 100 92 100 100-100 94 99 100 99 98 - Science 2016 99 99 98 97 99 100 * 100 * 100 97 98 100 99 98 - https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015-16+federal+report+card&_program=perfrept.perfmast.sas&prgopt=20162ff 2/10

2015 99 99 98 98 100 94 100 100-100 97 99 100 98 98 - Social Studies 2016 98 99 98 98 98 100-100 - 100 100 98 97 98 98-2015 99 99 99 99 100 98 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 - STAAR Participation Results by Assessment Type for Students Served in ucation Settings (All Grades) Reading Tests of Participants 2016 98 98 98 99 94 100 - * - - 98 96 88 98 98 - STAAR/EOC With No Accommodations 2016 13 20 20 23 16 20 - * - - 20 21 12 10 26 - STAAR/EOC With Accommodations 2016 73 67 71 71 61 76 - * - - 71 72 76 84 64 - STAAR Alternate2 2016 11 10 7 5 16 4 - * - - 7 4 0 4 9 - of Non-Participants 2016 2 2 2 1 6 0 - * - - 2 4 12 2 2 - Mathematics Tests of Participants 2016 99 99 97 98 100 91 - * * - 97 95 100 96 98 - STAAR/EOC With No Accommodations 2016 12 19 12 12 0 18 - * * - 12 5 20 19 8 - STAAR/EOC With Accommodations 2016 75 69 79 84 78 64 - * * - 79 87 80 69 85 - STAAR Alternate2 2016 12 10 6 2 22 9 - * * - 6 3 0 8 5 - of Non-Participants 2016 1 1 3 2 0 9 - * * - 3 5 0 4 3 - '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. Part II: Student Achievement and State Academic Annual Measureable Objectives (AMOs) This section provides the STAAR performance results for each subject area tested in the 2015-16 school year. These results only include tested students who were in the accountability subset. This section also includes four-year and five-year graduation rates and participation rates on STAAR for reading and mathematics. All Students Hispanic https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015-16+federal+report+card&_program=perfrept.perfmast.sas&prgopt=20162ff 3/10 Disadv (Current & Monitored) + Total Met Total Eligible White Performance Status - State State Target 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Reading Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N 7 9 78 Mathematics Y Y Y Y Y N Y 6 7 86 Writing 0 0 Science Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y 7 8 88 Social Studies Y Y Y Y Y N 5 6 83 Percent of Eligible Measures Met

Percent of All (Current Total Total Eligible Measures Students Hispanic White Disadv & Monitored) + Met Eligible Met Total 25 30 83 Performance Status - Federal Federal Target 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Reading N N N N n/a n/a n/a n/a N N n/a Mathematics N N N N n/a n/a n/a n/a N N n/a Participation Status Target 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Reading Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 9 9 100 Mathematics Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 8 100 Total 17 17 100 Federal Graduation Status (Target: See Reason Codes) Graduation Target Met Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 7 7 100 Reason Code *** a a a b a a c Total 7 7 100 District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading Alternate 1 n/a Number Proficient n/a Total Federal Cap Limit n/a Mathematics Alternate 1 n/a Number Proficient n/a Total Federal Cap Limit n/a Total Overall Total 49 54 91 + Participation uses (Current), Graduation uses (Ever HS) *** Federal Graduation Rate Reason Codes: a = Graduation Rate Goal of 90 c = Safe Harbor Target of a 10 decrease in difference from the prior year rate and the Goal b = Four-year Graduation Rate Target of 88 d = Five-year Graduation Rate Target of 90 Blank cells above represent student group indicators that do not meet the minimum size criteria. n/a Indicates the student group is not applicable to System Safeguards. All Students Hispanic White https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015-16+federal+report+card&_program=perfrept.perfmast.sas&prgopt=20162ff 4/10 Disadv (Current & Monitored) Performance Rates Reading # at Level II Satisfactory Standard 849 395 207 124 * 86 * 36 406 37 72 n/a Total Tests 1,137 545 278 160 * 105 * 44 585 135 125 96 at Level II Satisfactory Standard 75 72 74 78 * 82 * 82 69 27 58 n/a Mathematics # at Level II Satisfactory Standard 290 142 69 39 * 22 * 15 158 18 31 n/a Total Tests 393 204 94 49 * 23 * 18 223 63 45 35 at Level II Satisfactory Standard 74 70 73 80 * 96 * 83 71 29 69 n/a (Current)

All Students Hispanic White Disadv (Current & Monitored) Writing # at Level II Satisfactory Standard - - - - - - - - - - - n/a Total Tests - - - - - - - - - - - - at Level II Satisfactory Standard - - - - - - - - - - - n/a Science # at Level II Satisfactory Standard 432 186 107 64 * 53 * 20 213 25 41 n/a Total Tests 498 225 121 71 * 55 * 22 254 60 52 38 at Level II Satisfactory Standard 87 83 88 90 * 96 * 91 84 42 79 n/a Social Studies # at Level II Satisfactory Standard 380 181 107 50-21 - 21 184 19 28 n/a Total Tests 407 198 116 51-21 - 21 204 36 33 24 at Level II Satisfactory Standard 93 91 92 98-100 - 100 90 53 85 n/a Participation Rates Reading: 2015-2016 Assessments Number Participating 1,218 577 303 167 * 119 * 46 631 143 n/a 128 Total Students 1,231 580 307 170 * 121 * 47 640 144 n/a 128 Participation Rate 99 99 99 98 * 98 * 98 99 99 n/a 100 Mathematics: 2015-2016 Assessments Number Participating 415 213 103 50 * 25 * 18 234 64 n/a 41 Total Students 424 217 105 51 * 25 * 20 239 66 n/a 41 Participation Rate 98 98 98 98 * 100 * 90 98 97 n/a 100 (Current) * Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. ** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked (regardless of size). - Indicates there are no students in the group. n/a Indicates the student group is not applicable to System Safeguards. All Students Hispanic White https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015-16+federal+report+card&_program=perfrept.perfmast.sas&prgopt=20162ff 5/10 Disadv (Ever HS) Federal Graduation Rates 4-year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2015 Number Graduated 348 168 82 52 * 28 - ** 143 28 14 n/a Total in Class 374 178 91 59 * 28 - ** 156 37 16 12 Graduation Rate 93.0 94.4 90.1 88.1 * 100.0-100.0 91.7 75.7 87.5 n/a 4-year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2014 Number Graduated 373 165 99 53 * 36 - ** 165 25 20 n/a Total in Class 398 180 105 56 * 37 - ** 174 37 21 7 Graduation Rate 93.7 91.7 94.3 94.6 * 97.3-100.0 94.8 67.6 95.2 n/a 5-year Extended Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2014 Number Graduated 375 165 100 54 * 36 - ** 164 27 20 n/a Total in Class 396 178 105 56 * 37 - ** 171 36 21 7 Graduation Rate 94.7 92.7 95.2 96.4 * 97.3-100.0 95.9 75.0 95.2 n/a District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading Number Proficient n/a Total Federal Cap Limit n/a (Current)

All Students Mathematics Number Proficient n/a Total Federal Cap Limit n/a Hispanic White Disadv (Ever HS) (Current) * Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. ** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked (regardless of size). - Indicates there are no students in the group. n/a Indicates the student group is not applicable to System Safeguards. Source: 2016 Accountability System Safeguards Report Part III: Priority and Focus Schools Priority schools are the lowest 5 of Title I served campuses based on performance in reading, mathematics and graduation rates. Priority schools include Tier I or Tier II TTIPS schools, campuses with graduation rates less than 60, and lowest achieving campuses based on All Students reading/math performance. Focus schools are 10 of Title I served campuses, not already identified as priority schools, that have the widest gaps between student group performance and safeguard targets. Campuses are ranked based on the largest gaps between student group reading/math performance and the annual measurable objectives (AMO) target of 83. Campuses were originally staged as priority and focus based on data from the 2013 Accountability Reports.Priority and focus schools having improved in performance and are no longer identified as improvement required for the August 2015 and 2016 ratingswill include a "Progress" label. All schools that do not meet that criteria will remain identified as priority or focus. Priority School Identification: No Focus School Identification: No Priority School Reason: N/A Focus School Reason: N/A A high-performance reward school is identified as a Title I school with distinctions based on reading and math performance. In addition, at the high school level, a reward school is a Title I school with the highest graduation rates. A high progress school is identified as a Title I school in the top 25 in annual improvement; and/or a school in the top 25 of those demonstrating ability to close performance gaps based on system safeguards. The reward school identifications provided are for the 2015-2016 school year.identifications for the 2016-2017 school year are pending. High Performing School: No High Progress School: No Source: TEA Division of School Improvement and Support Part IV: Teacher Quality Data Part IV A: Percent of Teachers by Highest Degree Held Professional qualifications of all public elementary and secondary school teachers in the State of Texas. The distribution of degrees attained by teachers are shown https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015-16+federal+report+card&_program=perfrept.perfmast.sas&prgopt=20162ff 6/10

as the percent of total Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) count of teachers with no degree, bachelor s, master s, and doctorate degrees. ----------------- Campus ----------------- Number Percent District Percent State Percent No Degree 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 Bachelors 59.2 59.7 73.8 74.7 Masters 37.0 37.3 25.3 23.6 Doctorate 3.0 3.0 0.8 0.6 Part IV B and C: Teachers with Emergency/Provisional Credentials, Highly Qualified (HQ) Teachers Low Poverty/ High Poverty Summary Reports The percentage of all public elementary and secondary school teachers teaching with emergency or provisional credentials, and the percentage of classes in the state not taught by highly qualified teachers disaggregated by high-poverty compared to low-poverty schools. For this purpose, high-poverty means schools in the top quartile of poverty and low-poverty means the bottom quartile of poverty in the state. Core Academic Subject Areas General Total ucation ucation Total Number of Teachers 65 9 74 Total Number of Classes 367 56 423 Number of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Number 367 56 423 Percent 100.00 100.00 100.00 Number of Classes Taught by Not Highly Qualified Teachers Number 0 0 0 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 Number of Core Academic Teachers Who Are Teaching on the Following Permits ------------ Number of Teachers -------- ---- Elem (PK-6) secondary (7-12) Emergency (for certified personnel) 0 0 Emergency (for uncertified personnel) 0 0 Non-renewable 0 0 Temporary Classroom Assignment 0 0 District Teaching 0 0 Temporary 0 0 Number of Core Academic Teachers with a Probationary Certificate Enrolled in an Alternative Certification https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015-16+federal+report+card&_program=perfrept.perfmast.sas&prgopt=20162ff 7/10

------------ Number of Teachers ------------ General ucation ucation Highly Qualified 3 0 Not Highly Qualified 0 0 Source: TEA Division of Federal and State ucation Policy Part V: Graduates Enrolled in Texas Institution of Higher ucation (IHE) This section provides the percentage of students who enroll and begin instruction at an institution of higher education in the school year (fall or spring semester) following high school graduation. The rate reflects the percent of total graduates during the 2012-13 school year who attended a public or independent college or university in Texas in the 2013-14 academic year. Year Enrolled in Higher ucation Campus District State 2013-14 70.3 68.6 57.5 2012-13 66.5 65.9 56.9 Source: Texas Higher ucation Coordinating Board Part VI: Statewide National Assessment of ucational Progress (NAEP) Results The most recent NAEP results for Texas are provided showing statewide reading and mathematics performance results and participation rates, disaggregated by student group. State Level: 2015 Percentages at NAEP Achievement Levels Basic Proficient Advanced Grade Subject Student Group Below Basic Grade 4 Reading Overall 36 64 31 7 n/a n/a n/a n/a 13 87 66 30 Black 49 51 17 2 Hispanic 44 56 22 3 White 18 82 50 13 Students with Disabilities 71 29 11 2 English Language Learners 59 41 12 2 National School Lunch Program 46 54 20 3 Mathematics Overall 14 86 44 8 n/a n/a n/a n/a https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015-16+federal+report+card&_program=perfrept.perfmast.sas&prgopt=20162ff 8/10

Grade Subject Student Group Basic Proficient Advanced Below Basic 3 97 82 36 Black 24 76 29 2 Hispanic 16 84 37 4 White 7 93 60 15 Students with Disabilities 41 59 18 2 English Language Learners 23 77 28 2 National School Lunch Program 19 81 30 2 Grade 8 Reading Overall 28 72 28 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a 12 88 55 12 Black 38 62 19 2 Hispanic 35 65 19 1 White 14 86 43 4 Students with Disabilities 70 30 5 n/a English Language Learners 71 29 2 n/a National School Lunch Program 36 64 18 1 Mathematics Overall 25 75 32 7 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5 95 67 25 Black 43 57 16 2 Hispanic 31 69 23 4 White 12 88 48 12 Students with Disabilities 62 38 8 1 English Language Learners 60 40 6 n/a National School Lunch Program 34 66 20 3 State Level: 2015 Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and Limited English Proficient Students Grade Subject Student Group Grade 4 Reading Students with Disabilities 72 Limited English Proficient 92 Mathematics Students with Disabilities 80 Limited English Proficient 95 Grade 8 Reading Students with Disabilities 81 Limited English Proficient 95 Mathematics Students with Disabilities 81 Limited English Proficient 90 Source: TEA Division of Student Assessment https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015-16+federal+report+card&_program=perfrept.perfmast.sas&prgopt=20162ff 9/10

https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015-16+federal+report+card&_program=perfrept.perfmast.sas&prgopt=20162 10/10