Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools

Similar documents
Shelters Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Evaluation of Teach For America:

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Kahului Elementary School


Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Educational Attainment

Raw Data Files Instructions

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

State of New Jersey

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Hokulani Elementary School

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Best Colleges Main Survey

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

University of Arizona

African American Success Initiative

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

12-month Enrollment

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Transportation Equity Analysis

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Bellehaven Elementary

PEIMS Submission 1 list

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

El Toro Elementary School

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Idaho Public Schools

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Conroe Independent School District

Hitchcock Independent School District. District Improvement Plan

Rural Education in Oregon

SAN JACINTO COLLEGE JOB DESCRIPTION

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

Apply Texas. Tracking Student Progress

African American Male Achievement Update

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

46 Children s Defense Fund

Transcription:

Part I: Student Achievement by Proficiency Level Texas Education Agency 2015 16 Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools Campus Name: CEDAR CREEK H S Campus ID: 011901002 District Name: BASTROP ISD This section provides the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) performance results for each subject area and grade level tested in the 2015 16 school year. These results include all students tested, whether or not they were in the accountability subset. African Special Econ State DistrictCampus AmericanHispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Ed Disadv Female Male Migrant STAAR At or Above Level II Satisfactory (2016) or Phase in 1 Level II (2015) End of Course English I 2016 63 56 51 45 45 75 * 63 24 47 25 58 45 * 2015 66 62 62 54 58 75 * * * 30 55 33 72 53 * English II 2016 66 61 59 45 56 74 * * 64 20 53 22 72 48 * 2015 69 66 65 63 60 84 * * 67 29 58 35 68 62 * Algebra I 2016 76 67 56 84 53 64 * 31 56 39 56 56 * 2015 77 74 62 47 63 66 * * 37 61 53 62 62 * Biology 2016 86 88 86 73 83 96 * 82 55 85 60 90 83 * 2015 88 94 93 100 90 99 * * * * 90 80 95 92 * U.S. History 2016 90 88 88 92 86 93 * * 100 43 84 69 88 89 * 2015 88 87 89 76 88 93 * * 100 52 86 80 89 89 * All Grades All Subjects 2016 74 66 66 67 62 80 75 * 65 32 62 38 72 61 80 2015 73 67 71 63 67 84 80 90 65 35 65 46 75 67 85 Reading 2016 72 64 55 45 50 74 * * 63 22 50 24 65 47 67 2015 74 68 63 59 59 79 * * 53 30 56 34 70 57 78 Mathematics 2016 75 67 56 84 53 64 * 31 56 39 56 56 * 2015 73 66 62 47 63 66 * * 37 61 53 62 62 * Science 2016 77 73 86 73 83 96 * 82 55 85 60 90 83 * 2015 75 68 93 100 90 99 * * * * 90 80 95 92 * Social Studies 2016 76 70 88 92 86 93 * * 100 43 84 69 88 89 * 2015 74 73 89 76 88 93 * * 100 52 86 80 89 89 * STAAR at Final Level II or Above All Grades All Subjects 2016 42 34 36 35 30 57 63 * 30 9 29 9 40 32 33 2015 38 31 38 28 32 59 40 80 41 11 31 8 42 34 31 Reading 2016 42 33 31 25 26 55 * * 26 7 26 4 40 24 33 2015 40 33 34 28 29 54 * * 24 8 27 6 42 28 22 Mathematics 2016 40 30 12 21 10 23 * 7 10 5 13 12 * 2015 36 27 16 7 14 25 * * 7 14 5 18 13 * Science 2016 44 40 52 45 45 75 * 55 18 44 20 57 49 * 2015 40 37 65 83 56 78 * * * * 56 5 66 63 * Social Studies 2016 45 40 56 58 50 72 * * 60 8 49 25 51 61 * 2015 41 38 57 29 50 73 * * 78 24 51 26 52 62 * STAAR at Level III Advanced All Grades All Subjects 2016 17 12 8 7 5 19 13 * 7 2 6 1 9 8 0 2015 14 10 9 5 6 18 0 20 15 2 6 1 10 8 0 Reading 2016 16 11 3 2 1 11 * * 4 1 2 0 6 1 0 2015 15 11 3 2 1 8 * * 0 0 1 0 5 1 0 https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015 16+Federal+Report+Card&_program 1/7

African Special Econ State DistrictCampus AmericanHispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Ed Disadv Female Male Migrant Mathematics 2016 17 12 3 0 3 5 * 4 2 1 1 4 * 2015 14 10 5 0 5 6 * * 1 4 1 6 4 * Science 2016 15 13 14 9 8 34 * 18 2 10 2 14 13 * 2015 14 13 27 0 23 38 * * * * 19 0 30 23 * Social Studies 2016 21 17 23 21 19 37 * * 20 0 17 6 19 28 * 2015 18 14 21 24 14 31 * * 44 7 16 3 14 27 * STAAR Participation (All Grades) All Tests 2016 99 100 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 99 99 99 100 99 100 2015 99 99 98 99 98 98 100 100 97 94 97 93 99 97 100 Reading 2016 99 100 99 100 99 99 * * 100 99 99 100 100 99 100 2015 99 99 97 98 97 96 100 100 94 89 96 88 98 96 100 Mathematics 2016 100 100 99 95 99 100 100 100 98 97 99 98 * 2015 99 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 100 100 Science 2016 99 99 99 100 100 99 * 100 98 99 98 100 99 * 2015 99 99 98 100 98 99 100 100 100 92 98 100 99 97 100 Social Studies 2016 98 99 100 100 100 100 * * 100 100 100 100 100 99 * 2015 99 99 99 100 99 100 100 100 100 100 99 100 99 99 100 STAAR Participation Results by Assessment Type for Students Served in Special Education Settings (All Grades) Reading Tests of Participants 2016 98 98 95 100 94 97 100 95 94 87 96 94 STAAR/EOC With No Accommodations 2016 13 14 12 8 7 28 33 12 8 4 10 13 STAAR/EOC With Accommodations 2016 73 78 78 92 82 59 67 78 81 79 80 77 STAAR Alternate2 2016 11 6 5 0 5 10 0 5 5 4 6 5 of Non Participants 2016 2 2 5 0 6 3 0 5 6 13 4 6 Mathematics Tests of Participants 2016 99 100 100 100 100 100 * 100 100 100 100 100 STAAR/EOC With No Accommodations 2016 12 15 11 20 8 13 * 11 7 11 10 11 STAAR/EOC With Accommodations 2016 75 78 84 80 84 87 * 84 86 79 86 82 STAAR Alternate2 2016 12 6 5 0 8 0 * 5 7 11 3 7 of Non Participants 2016 1 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. ' ' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. Part II: Student Achievement and State Academic Annual Measureable Objectives (AMOs) This section provides the STAAR performance results for each subject area tested in the 2015 16 school year. These results only include tested students who were in the accountability subset. This section also includes four year and five year graduation rates and participation rates on STAAR for reading and mathematics. Econ Special(Current & Total Total of Eligible Measures StudentsAmericanHispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Ed Monitored) + Met Eligible Met Performance Status State State Target 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Reading N N N Y N N N 1 7 14 Mathematics N N Y N N N 1 6 17 Writing 0 0 https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015 16+Federal+Report+Card&_program 2/7

Econ Special(Current & Total Total of Eligible Measures StudentsAmericanHispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Ed Monitored) + Met Eligible Met Science Y Y Y Y N Y 5 6 83 Social Studies Y Y Y Y N Y 5 6 83 Total 12 25 48 Performance Status Federal Federal Target 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Reading N N N n/a n/a n/a n/a N N N n/a Mathematics N N N n/a n/a n/a n/a N N N n/a Participation Status Target 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Reading Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 8 100 Mathematics Y Y Y Y Y Y 6 6 100 Total 14 14 100 Federal Graduation Status (Target: See Reason Codes) Graduation Target Met Y Y Y Y Y 5 5 100 Reason Code *** a a a a a Total 5 5 100 District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading Alternate 1 n/a Mathematics Alternate 1 n/a Total Overall Total 31 44 70 + Participation uses (Current), Graduation uses (Ever HS) *** Federal Graduation Rate Reason Codes: a = Graduation Rate Goal of 90 c = Safe Harbor Target of a 10 decrease in difference from the prior year rate and the Goal b = Four year Graduation Rate Target of 88 d = Five year Graduation Rate Target of 90 Blank cells above represent student group indicators that do not meet the minimum size criteria. n/a Indicates the student group is not applicable to System Safeguards. Students American Hispanic White American Indian https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015 16+Federal+Report+Card&_program 3/7 Asian Pacific Islander Races Econ Disadv Special Ed (Current & Monitored) (Current) Performance Rates Reading # at Level II Satisfactory 572 19 385 149 * * 14 372 31 73 n/a Total Tests 1,015 40 752 195 * * 22 736 137 244 196 at Level II Satisfactory 56 48 51 76 * * 64 51 23 30 n/a Mathematics # at Level II Satisfactory 194 ** 141 35 * 148 20 46 n/a Total Tests 333 ** 252 54 * 257 64 97 80 at Level II Satisfactory 58 83 56 65 * 58 31 47 n/a Writing # at Level II Satisfactory n/a Total Tests at Level II Satisfactory n/a Science # at Level II Satisfactory 286 ** 198 71 * 8 197 22 50 n/a Total Tests 325 ** 230 73 * 9 228 37 67 44 at Level II Satisfactory 88 73 86 97 * 89 86 59 75 n/a Social Studies # at Level II Satisfactory 312 21 218 66 * * * 200 16 39 n/a Total Tests 352 22 253 70 * * * 236 37 55 47 at Level II Satisfactory 89 95 86 94 * * * 85 43 71 n/a Participation Rates

Students American Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Races Econ Disadv Special Ed (Current & Monitored) (Current) White Asian Reading: 2015 2016 Assessments Number Participating 1,115 44 827 209 * * 27 807 155 n/a 238 Total Students 1,123 44 833 211 * * 27 814 157 n/a 238 Participation Rate 99 100 99 99 * * 100 99 99 n/a 100 Mathematics: 2015 2016 Assessments Number Participating 369 19 277 61 11 284 74 n/a 95 Total Students 374 20 281 61 11 289 74 n/a 98 Participation Rate 99 95 99 100 100 98 100 n/a 97 * Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. ** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked (regardless of size). Indicates there are no students in the group. n/a Indicates the student group is not applicable to System Safeguards. Students American Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Races Econ Disadv Special Ed (Ever HS) (Current) White Asian Federal Graduation Rates 4 year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9 12): Class of 2015 Number Graduated 239 12 141 79 * ** 137 23 26 n/a Total in Class 248 13 146 82 * ** 143 25 26 20 Graduation Rate 96.4 92.3 96.6 96.3 * 100.0 95.8 92.0 100.0 n/a 4 year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9 12): Class of 2014 Number Graduated 226 8 120 88 * * 5 123 18 23 n/a Total in Class 237 8 124 94 * * 6 133 24 25 8 Graduation Rate 95.4 100.0 96.8 93.6 * * 83.3 92.5 75.0 92.0 n/a 5 year Extended Graduation Rate (Gr 9 12): Class of 2014 Number Graduated 227 8 121 88 * * 5 124 18 23 n/a Total in Class 235 8 123 94 * * 5 131 23 24 7 Graduation Rate 96.6 100.0 98.4 93.6 * * 100.0 94.7 78.3 95.8 n/a District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading Mathematics * Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. ** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked (regardless of size). Indicates there are no students in the group. n/a Indicates the student group is not applicable to System Safeguards. Source: 2016 Accountability System Safeguards Report Part III: Priority and Focus Schools Priority schools are the lowest 5 of Title I served campuses based on performance in reading, mathematics and graduation rates. Priority schools include Tier I or Tier II TTIPS schools, campuses with graduation rates less than 60, and lowest achieving campuses based on All Students reading/math performance. Focus schools are 10 of Title I served campuses, not already identified as priority schools, that have the widest gaps between student group performance and safeguard targets. Campuses are ranked based on the largest gaps between student group reading/math performance and the annual measurable objectives (AMO) target of 83. Campuses were originally staged as priority and focus based on data from the 2013 Accountability Reports.Priority and focus schools having improved in performance and are no longer identified as improvement required for the August 2015 and 2016 ratingswill include a "Progress" label. All schools that do not meet that criteria will remain identified as priority or focus. Priority School Identification: No Focus School Identification: No Priority School Reason: N/A Focus School Reason: N/A A high performance reward school is identified as a Title I school with distinctions based on reading and math performance. In addition, at the high school level, a reward school is a Title I school with the highest graduation rates. A high progress school is identified as a Title I school in the top 25 in annual improvement; and/or a school in the top 25 of those demonstrating ability to close performance gaps based on system safeguards. The reward school identifications provided are for the 2015 2016 school year.identifications for the 2016 2017 school year are pending. High Performing School: No https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015 16+Federal+Report+Card&_program 4/7

High Progress School: No Source: TEA Division of School Improvement and Support Part IV: Teacher Quality Data Part IV A: of Teachers by Highest Degree Held Professional qualifications of all public elementary and secondary school teachers in the State of Texas. The distribution of degrees attained by teachers are shown as the percent of total Full Time Equivalent (FTE) count of teachers with no degree, bachelor s, master s, and doctorate degrees. Campus Number District State No Degree 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.0 Bachelors 71.0 70.3 75.5 74.7 Masters 29.1 28.8 23.2 23.6 Doctorate 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.6 Part IV B and C: Teachers with Emergency/Provisional Credentials, Highly Qualified (HQ) Teachers Low Poverty/ High Poverty Summary Reports The percentage of all public elementary and secondary school teachers teaching with emergency or provisional credentials, and the percentage of classes in the state not taught by highly qualified teachers disaggregated by high poverty compared to low poverty schools. For this purpose, high poverty means schools in the top quartile of poverty and low poverty means the bottom quartile of poverty in the state. Core Academic Subject Areas General Special Total Education Education Total Number of Teachers 73 9 82 Total Number of Classes 439 29 468 Number of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Number 439 29 468 100.00 100.00 100.00 Number of Classes Taught by Not Highly Qualified Teachers Number 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Number of Core Academic Teachers Who Are Teaching on the Following Permits Number of Teachers Elem (PK 6) secondary (7 12) Emergency (for certified personnel) 0 0 Emergency (for uncertified personnel) 0 0 Non renewable 0 0 Temporary Classroom Assignment 0 0 District Teaching 0 0 Temporary 0 0 Number of Core Academic Teachers with a Probationary Certificate Enrolled in an Alternative Certification Number of Teachers General Education Special Education Highly Qualified 6 0 Not Highly Qualified 0 0 Source: TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy Part V: Graduates Enrolled in Texas Institution of Higher Education (IHE) https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015 16+Federal+Report+Card&_program 5/7

This section provides the percentage of students who enroll and begin instruction at an institution of higher education in the school year (fall or spring semester) following high school graduation. The rate reflects the percent of total graduates during the 2012 13 school year who attended a public or independent college or university in Texas in the 2013 14 academic year. Year Enrolled in Higher Education Campus District State 2013 14 49.8 42.5 57.5 2012 13 43.6 40.0 56.9 Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Part VI: Statewide National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Results The most recent NAEP results for Texas are provided showing statewide reading and mathematics performance results and participation rates, disaggregated by student group. State Level: 2015 ages at NAEP Achievement Levels At or Above Basic At or Above Proficient At or Above Advanced Grade Subject Student Group Below Basic Grade 4 Reading Overall 36 64 31 7 Asian 13 87 66 30 Black 49 51 17 2 Hispanic 44 56 22 3 White 18 82 50 13 Students with Disabilities 71 29 11 2 English Language Learners 59 41 12 2 National School Lunch Program 46 54 20 3 Mathematics Overall 14 86 44 8 Asian 3 97 82 36 Black 24 76 29 2 Hispanic 16 84 37 4 White 7 93 60 15 Students with Disabilities 41 59 18 2 English Language Learners 23 77 28 2 National School Lunch Program 19 81 30 2 Grade 8 Reading Overall 28 72 28 2 Asian 12 88 55 12 Black 38 62 19 2 Hispanic 35 65 19 1 White 14 86 43 4 Students with Disabilities 70 30 5 n/a English Language Learners 71 29 2 n/a National School Lunch Program 36 64 18 1 Mathematics Overall 25 75 32 7 Asian 5 95 67 25 Black 43 57 16 2 Hispanic 31 69 23 4 White 12 88 48 12 Students with Disabilities 62 38 8 1 English Language Learners 60 40 6 n/a National School Lunch Program 34 66 20 3 State Level: 2015 Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and Limited English Proficient Students Grade Subject Student Group Grade 4 Reading Students with Disabilities 72 Limited English Proficient 92 Mathematics Students with Disabilities 80 Limited English Proficient 95 Grade 8 Reading Students with Disabilities 81 https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015 16+Federal+Report+Card&_program 6/7

Grade Subject Student Group Limited English Proficient 95 Mathematics Students with Disabilities 81 Limited English Proficient 90 Source: TEA Division of Student Assessment https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&year4=2015&year2=15&_debug=0&single=n&title=2015 16+Federal+Report+Card&_program 7/7