Report Card to the Public School Year

Similar documents
Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Shelters Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

John F. Kennedy Middle School

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

African American Male Achievement Update

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

State of New Jersey

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Best Colleges Main Survey

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Kahului Elementary School

Educational Attainment

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Hokulani Elementary School

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

Clark Lane Middle School

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

University of Arizona

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Cuero Independent School District

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

El Toro Elementary School

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

Transportation Equity Analysis

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

State Parental Involvement Plan

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Bellehaven Elementary

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

46 Children s Defense Fund

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Status of Latino Education in Massachusetts: A Report

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Emergency Medical Technician Course Application

Rules and Discretion in the Evaluation of Students and Schools: The Case of the New York Regents Examinations *

Raw Data Files Instructions

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School


Robert Bennis Elementary School

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

World s Best Workforce Plan

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Bellevue University Admission Application

Transcription:

North Slope Borough School District PO Box 169, Barrow, AK 99723 907-852-5311 www.nsbsd.org Report Card to the School Year 2013-2014 Report Cards for individual NSBSD schools and additional district-wide data can be found at www.nsbsd.org District Statistics Student Enrollment 2013-2014 2012-2013 October 1 Student Count 1714 1603 Enrollment Change from Prior Year 5.0-0.1 Enrollment at October 1, 2013 Total K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Alak School, Wainwright 136 12 16 10 14 10 13 11 6 13 7 10 6 8 Barrow High School, Barrow 207 68 58 44 37 Eben Hopson Middle School, Barrow 247 84 67 96 Fred Ipalook Elementary School, Barrow 511 100 88 77 93 83 70 Harold Kaveolook School, Kaktovik 52 8 2 3 5 7 2 2 3 7 2 4 4 3 Kali School, Point Lay 76 5 6 10 3 11 7 6 7 7 1 2 5 6 Kiita Learning Community, Barrow 44 6 14 24 Meade River School, Atqasuk 64 4 6 6 4 4 4 5 8 5 5 8 1 4 Nuiqsut Trapper School, Nuiqsut 91 9 7 13 10 4 10 10 6 3 3 5 2 9 Nunamiut School, Anaktuvuk Pass 87 11 4 9 8 4 5 6 8 7 5 5 6 9 Tikigaq School, Point Hope 199 19 17 23 22 18 19 16 12 13 14 8 7 11 NSBSD Total 1714 168 146 151 159 141 130 140 117 151 105 106 89 111 Attendance Rate K-8 Retention Rate Graduation Rate Four Year Cohort 2013-2014 2012-2013 86.2 87.0 0.2 0.4 48.1 70.4 Five Year Cohort High School Graduates Dropout Rate - Grades 7-12 Dropouts - Grades 7-12 71.5 52 8.8 61 62.0 76 6.7 45 Persistently Dangerous Schools: None

10.8 Percent 14.7 42.6 36.2 29.8 47.5 46.2 43.6 42.4 36.6 51.8 53.4 52.4 55.1 50.3 48.1 46.0 56.3 Percent 21.7 25.4 29.3 38.1 Percent 27.6 47.8 55.0 52.6 55.8 49.6 47.2 48.9 44.9 42.5 36.4 42.8 43.2 64.1 61.1 57.1 61.4 58.9 59.3 61.0 56.7 Percent 49.6 47.1 42.6 46.8 51.6 51.0 49.3 49.5 51.6 47.3 60.2 North Slope Borough School District Report Card 2013-2014 statutes require all students to take the Standards Based (SBA) in grades 3-10 in reading, writing, and math, unless exempted due to being a newly arrived immigrant. A science component of the SBAs was added in 2008 for grades 4, 8, & 10. The SBAs measure what students know and are able to do at their grade level in reading, writing, math, and science as compared to the Performance Standards/Grade Level Expectations. All high school students are required to take and pass the High School Graduation Qualifying Exam (HSGQE) to be eligible for a diploma. The first administration of this exam occurs in the spring of a student's 10th grade year when students take an integrated HSGQE and SBA test that results in both an SBA score and an HSGQE score for reading, writing, and math. Students must retake any portion of the HSGQE that is not passed until all three subjects are passed. The HSGQE requirement was repealed July 1, 2014. 100 SBA Exams Spring 2013 & 2014 Grades 3-10 READING 100 SBA Exams Spring 2013 & 2014 Grades 3-10 WRITING 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 0 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th Spring 2013 Spring 2014 Spring 2013 Spring 2014 100 SBA Exams Spring 2013 & 2014 Grades 3-10 MATH 100 SBA Exams Spring 2013 & 2014 Grades 4, 8, and 10 SCIENCE 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th Spring 2013 Spring 2014 0 4th 8th 10th Spring 2013 Spring 2014

Percent Percent Percent North Slope Borough School District Report Card 2013-2014 Spring 2014 SBA Exams - NSBSD & State Percent by Grade 100 90 80 READING NSBSD State 83.5 81.5 78.3 81.1 81.3 81.0 78.1 80.1 75.3 70 60 64.1 55.8 61.1 61.4 59.3 56.7 57.0 50 40 30 20 10 47.2 44.9 0 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade Grades 3-10 100 90 WRITING NSBSD State 80 70 76.7 76.9 76.8 70.4 72.9 75.7 72.9 75.9 74.7 60 50 40 51.6 47.1 43.2 42.6 49.3 51.6 47.3 45.1 30 27.6 20 10 0 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade Grades 3-10 100 90 MATH NSBSD State 80 70 60 75.2 74.2 56.3 70.5 67.3 65.9 68.3 61.5 63.9 68.4 50 40 30 42.6 36.2 29.8 43.6 50.3 42.4 36.6 42.7 20 10 0 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade Grades 3-10 Results do not inlcude students on the Alternate Assessment.

NSBSD Spring 2014 SBA Exams - NSBSD & State - Grades 3-10 Percent by Subgroup State READING NSBSD State WRITING NSBSD State MATH All Students Male Female AK Native/Amer Ind 56.6 51.8 61.6 49.1 58.3 80.1 76.6 83.7 45.3 38.8 52.0 36.6 51.0 74.7 68.9 81.0 42.7 38.6 47.2 35.1 47.6 68.4 66.9 70.0 Asian/Pacific Isl African American 79.6 78.1 74.1 71.0 75.4 68.0 72.0 68.0 54.0 Hispanic 81.7 85.7 77.4 66.3 Caucasian Multi-Ethnic LEP Not LEP Econ Disadvan Not Econ Disadvan Stu w/ Disabilities 23.3 39.8 37.2 64.1 46.8 64.1 48.2 78.7 69.5 88.7 83.9 85.5 89.7 29.4 34.0 18.6 32.9 52.4 53.8 42.1 71.1 63.0 85.1 78.4 80.1 85.5 29.7 30.1 17.8 60.2 30.7 48.5 56.2 52.4 35.7 84.4 79.1 70.6 73.3 79.6 Stu w/o Disabilities 62.9 85.5 50.4 80.3 47.5 74.0 Migrant Not Migrant 56.6 68.9 81.1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Percent Results for some subgroups cannot be published without releasing personally identifiable information. State results do not include students on the Alternate Assessment. 45.3 62.6 75.8 59.9 42.7 69.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent

Percent North Slope Borough School District Report Card 2013-2014 Spring 2013 & Spring 2014 High School Graduation Qualifying Exam (Grades 10, 11 & 12) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 High School Graduation Qualifying Exams Spring 2013 & 2014 10th Grade 60.2 60.7 37.5 48.4 62.1 Reading Writing Math 61.3 Note: The Grade 11 and 12 proficiency levels shown do not represent the overall proficiency levels for all 11th and 12th grade students. These tables include only students who are being retested in grades 11 and 12 because they had not passed one or more subjects of the HSGQE in 10th grade or subsequent attempts. Spring 2013 & 2014 HSGQE Not Not Reading - 11th & 12th Grade Retests 11th Grade Spr 2013 5 31.3 11 68.8 11th Grade Spr 2014 8 33.3 16 66.7 12th Grade Spr 2013 2 40.0 3 60.0 12th Grade Spr 2014 3 30 7 70 Writing - 11th & 12th Grade Retests 11th Grade Spr 2013 6 33.3 12 66.7 11th Grade Spr 2014 9 27.3 24 72.7 12th Grade Spr 2013 5 31.3 11 68.8 12th Grade Spr 2014 2 15.4 11 84.6 Math - 11th & 12th Grade Retests 11th Grade Spr 2013 2 12.5 14 87.5 11th Grade Spr 2014 4 15.4 22 84.6 12th Grade Spr 2013 4 30.8 9 69.2 12th Grade Spr 2014 1 8.3 11 91.7 S13 -- S14 S13-- S14 S13 -- S14 Effective July 1, 2014 implemented the new high school graduation requirement as defined by HB 278 and the Governor s Education Opportunity Act. It requires all grade 11 students take a College- or Career-Readiness Assessment (CCRA) to earn a high school diploma in. The state Department of Education & Early Development (EED) will pay for one administration of one assessment for each student. This requirement replaces the High School Graduation Qualifying Examination. A passing score is not a requirement for a diploma.

North Slope Borough School District 2013-2014 Performance on Students are assessed on the Standards Based (SBAs) in reading, writing, and math (grades 3-10), and in science (grades 4, 8, & 10). Student performance is reported at four different levels:,,, and Far. In the pages that follow, SBA results are reported first by grade level and then by subgroups for the district as a whole. Results do not include students on the Alternate Assessment. Number and Percent of Students at Proficiency Level Adv. Adv. Spring 2014 SBA Exams Reading Writing Math Far Far Adv. Adv. Far Far Adv. Adv. Far Far Grade 3 4298 44.8 3516 36.7 932 9.7 840 8.8 3241 33.7 4133 43.0 1958 20.4 282 2.9 3685 38.4 3540 36.8 1027 10.7 1355 14.1 Grade 4 3130 33.0 4295 45.3 1008 10.6 1052 11.1 2929 30.9 4358 46.0 1845 19.5 344 3.6 3702 39.1 3322 35.1 1152 12.2 1287 13.6 Grade 5 2858 30.8 4664 50.3 1154 12.4 602 6.5 3308 35.7 3806 41.1 1996 21.5 153 1.7 3391 36.5 3156 34.0 1608 17.3 1131 12.2 Grade 6 3327 36.1 3869 42.0 1571 17.1 445 4.8 3090 33.6 3384 36.8 1982 21.5 745 8.1 3293 35.7 2909 31.6 1404 15.2 1608 17.5 Grade 7 3746 39.8 3913 41.5 1227 13.0 533 5.7 1545 16.4 5318 56.5 1955 20.8 599 6.4 2987 31.7 3227 34.2 1824 19.3 1396 14.8 Grade 8 3861 41.4 3926 42.1 1219 13.1 319 3.4 836 9.0 6203 66.7 1767 19.0 496 5.3 2832 30.4 3538 37.9 1393 14.9 1568 16.8 Grade 9 4262 45.7 3288 35.3 1468 15.8 301 3.2 535 5.8 6234 67.1 1772 19.1 749 8.1 2891 31.1 2829 30.4 1683 18.1 1899 20.4 Grade 10 2065 24.0 4406 51.3 1743 20.3 378 4.4 258 3.0 6255 72.9 1647 19.2 424 4.9 1475 17.2 4000 46.7 1859 21.7 1236 14.4 Number and Percent of Students at Proficiency Level Spring 2014 SBA Exams Science Far Profidient Far Profidient Grade 4 1817 19.7 2866 31.1 2805 30.4 1732 18.8 Grade 8 2024 22.1 3223 35.2 1883 20.6 2025 22.1 Grade 10 2364 28.6 3024 36.6 1831 22.2 1045 12.6

. Spring 2014 SBA Grades 3-10 READING Far Total Tested Percent Tested Student Subgroup District State District State District State District State District District State All Students 12.2 37.1 44.8 43.0 28.2 13.9 14.8 6.0 997 97.7 98.3 Male 10.7 33.1 41.3 43.5 29.4 16.1 18.6 7.3 510 97.1 98.2 Female 13.8 41.3 48.4 42.4 26.9 11.6 10.9 4.7 487 98.4 98.4 Native/American Indian 7.0 15.9 42.2 42.4 33.4 27.2 17.4 14.4 762 96.8 97.9 Caucasian 59.4 49.8 40.6 40.2 0.0 7.3 0.0 2.6 33 97.1 98.3 Asian/Pacific Islander 30.1 29.2 49.5 48.9 11.8 16.6 8.6 5.3 93 100.0 99.0 African American 25.3 60 or more 48.8 Hispanic 33.3 48.4 13.5 4.8 40 or fewer 18.5 7.4 5 100.0 98.2 4 57.1 98.4 Multi-Ethnic 18.1 36.7 60.6 47.2 13.8 11.8 7.4 4.3 94 100.0 98.2 LEP Students 2.4 4.3 33.4 32.9 40.2 39.1 24.0 23.7 310 93.1 98.0 Not LEP Students 16.4 41.3 49.6 44.2 23.1 10.7 10.9 3.8 687 100.0 98.3 Econ. Disadvantaged 6.5 23.1 40.3 46.4 34.0 20.6 19.1 9.9 434 96.4 98.2 Not Econ. Disadvantaged 16.5 49.9 48.2 39.8 23.7 7.8 11.5 2.5 563 98.8 98.3 Students w/ Disabilities 0.7 10.8 22.8 37.4 37.9 31.9 38.6 19.9 159 97.5 97.3 Students w/o Disabilities 14.2 41.6 48.6 43.9 26.5 10.8 10.7 3.7 838 97.8 98.4 Migrant Students NA 22.9 NA 46.0 NA 21.1 NA 10.0 0 NA 98.5 Not Migrant Students 12.2 38.4 44.8 42.7 28.2 13.3 14.8 5.7 997 97.7 98.2 Spring 2014 SBA Grades 3-10 WRITING Far Total Tested Percent Tested Student Subgroup District State District State District State District State District District State All Students 6.5 21.2 38.7 53.5 42.0 20.1 12.9 5.1 1000 98.0 98.2 Male 4.3 16.2 34.4 52.7 43.1 24.0 18.2 7.1 515 98.1 98.1 Female 8.8 26.6 43.2 54.4 40.9 16.0 7.1 3.0 485 98.0 98.3 Native/American Indian 3.7 7.7 32.9 43.3 48.0 36.5 15.4 12.5 770 97.8 97.8 Caucasian 19.4 28.5 74.2 56.6 6.5 12.7 0.0 2.2 32 94.1 98.2 Asian/Pacific Islander 16.1 18.4 54.8 57.0 24.7 20.4 4.3 4.2 93 100.0 98.9 African American 14.4 40 or fewer 53.6 60 or more 25.9 6.1 5 100.0 98.0 Hispanic 28.6 19.5 57.1 57.9 14.3 18.8 0.0 3.8 7 100.0 98.2 Multi-Ethnic 14.4 22.5 56.7 55.9 22.2 17.7 6.7 3.8 90 95.7 98.1 LEP Students 1.3 3.4 23.9 29.5 54.5 47.9 20.2 19.2 311 93.4 97.9 Not LEP Students 8.7 23.5 45.0 56.6 36.6 16.6 9.7 3.3 689 100.3 98.2 Econ. Disadvantaged 3.0 12.9 30.7 50.1 50.7 28.8 15.6 8.3 435 96.7 98.1 Not Econ. Disadvantaged 9.1 28.8 44.8 56.7 35.3 12.3 10.8 2.3 565 99.1 98.2 Students w/ Disabilities 0.0 5.9 15.6 36.2 47.6 41.3 36.7 16.5 161 98.8 97.3 Students w/o Disabilities 7.6 23.8 42.7 56.5 41.0 16.5 8.7 3.2 839 97.9 98.3 Migrant Students NA 12.5 NA 50.1 NA 28.9 NA 8.4 0 NA 98.4 Not Migrant Students 6.5 22.0 38.7 53.8 42.0 19.3 12.9 4.8 1000 98.0 98.2

MATH Spring 2014 SBA Grades 3-10 Far Total Tested Percent Tested Student Subgroup District State District State District State District State District District State All Students 13.2 32.7 29.5 35.7 23.1 16.1 34.2 15.5 1007 98.7 98.2 Male 12.0 32.6 26.6 34.3 24.4 16.5 37.0 16.7 520 99.0 98.1 Female 14.4 32.7 32.8 37.3 21.7 15.7 31.1 14.2 487 98.4 98.3 Native/American Indian 8.9 15.7 26.1 31.9 25.1 22.0 39.9 30.4 774 98.3 97.9 Caucasian 54.8 42.9 32.3 36.2 3.2 12.4 9.7 8.5 32 94.1 98.1 Asian/Pacific Islander 29.0 29.4 43.0 38.6 12.9 17.3 15.1 14.7 93 100.0 98.8 African American 18.6 40 or fewer 35.4 60 or more 22.2 23.7 5 100.0 98.4 Hispanic 28.6 27.1 57.1 39.2 14.3 18.2 0.0 15.5 7 100.0 98.4 Multi-Ethnic 18.3 32.8 41.9 37.8 21.5 16.3 18.3 13.1 93 98.9 98.3 LEP Students 3.3 6.1 22.4 24.6 24.1 24.4 50.2 45.0 312 93.7 98.1 Not LEP Students 17.4 36.1 32.6 37.2 22.7 15.0 27.3 11.7 395 57.5 98.2 Econ. Disadvantaged 8.5 20.6 21.4 35.6 27.6 20.5 42.5 23.3 440 97.8 98.2 Not Econ. Disadvantaged 16.8 43.7 35.9 35.9 19.6 12.1 27.7 8.3 567 99.5 98.2 Students w/ Disabilities 2.0 10.3 14.1 25.4 17.4 23.6 66.4 40.7 163 100.0 97.5 Students w/o Disabilities 15.1 36.5 32.3 37.5 24.1 14.8 28.5 11.2 844 98.5 98.3 Migrant Students NA 23.0 NA 36.9 NA 18.7 NA 21.4 0 NA 98.3 Not Migrant Students 13.2 33.6 29.5 35.6 23.1 15.9 34.2 14.9 1007 98.7 98.2 SCIENCE Spring 2014 SBA Grades 4, 8, and 10 Far Total Tested Percent Tested Student Subgroup District State District State District State District State District District State All Students 4.5 23.3 17.8 34.2 34.6 24.5 43.1 18.0 356 92.7 95.0 Male 5.9 25.4 17.7 33.2 32.3 23.0 44.1 18.4 187 92.6 94.8 Female 3.0 21.1 18.0 35.3 37.1 26.0 41.9 17.7 169 92.9 95.3 Native/American Indian 1.9 8.8 12.9 25.0 35.0 29.2 50.2 37.0 265 91.4 94.8 Caucasian 7.7 33.6 69.2 38.8 23.1 19.4 0.0 8.2 13 92.9 94.4 Asian/Pacific Islander 9.7 14.6 32.3 30.3 35.5 31.5 22.6 23.7 31 96.9 97.2 African American 9.5 28.8 33.7 28.0 1 100.0 97.0 Hispanic 18.0 35.6 29.0 17.4 3 100.0 95.6 Multi-Ethnic 11.9 21.7 21.4 37.7 38.1 26.5 28.6 14.2 42 95.5 95.7 LEP Students 0.0 1.1 4.0 8.4 28.7 28.8 67.3 61.7 100 82.0 95.7 Not LEP Students 6.3 26.0 23.4 37.3 36.9 24.0 33.3 12.8 256 97.7 95.0 Econ. Disadvantaged 1.3 11.8 11.3 29.0 30.0 30.4 57.3 28.7 151 92.6 95.3 Not Econ. Disadvantaged 6.9 33.3 22.7 38.7 37.9 19.3 32.5 8.7 205 92.8 94.8 Students w/ Disabilities 0.0 6.5 6.7 18.2 24.4 31.1 68.9 44.2 49 90.7 93.7 Students w/o Disabilities 5.2 26.0 19.5 36.8 36.0 23.4 39.3 13.8 307 93.0 95.2 Migrant Students NA 12.5 NA 29.9 NA 30.2 NA 27.4 0 NA 96.3 Not Migrant Students 4.5 24.3 17.8 34.6 34.6 24.0 43.1 17.2 356 92.7 94.9 Results are not published when fewer than five students are tested or two or fewer students are reported in an individual cell. Note: NA indicates there were no students participating during this test administration.

Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) The Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is the only national test of what students know and can do. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 mandated state participation in NAEP reading and mathematics assessments in grades 4 and 8 every other year so that NAEP could serve as the common measure of student achievement. NAEP does not test each fourth or eighth grader in the state. A representative sample of schools is chosen to participate in the NAEP. No NAEP individual results are given for students or schools; only statewide results are reported. NAEP scores can be used to compare to the nation and to other states. NAEP assessments are designed to assess NAEP standards, also known as NAEP frameworks. NAEP does not assess students on the standards (grade level expectations). Standards Based (SBAs) are designed to assess Grade Level Expectations, and SBAs are administered to all students in grades 3-10. More information about the NAEP in can be found at http://www.eed.state.ak.us/tls/assessment/naep.html. There are three achievement levels for each grade assessed by NAEP: Basic,, and. on the NAEP indicates students "have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter." The following definitions apply to all subjects and all grades assessed by NAEP: Achievement-Level Policy Definitions Basic Partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at each grade Solid academic performance for each grade assessed. Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter, including subject-matter knowledge, application of such knowledge to real-world situations, and analytical skills appropriate to the subject matter. Superior performance. The charts on the following pages show how students' scores on the 2013 NAEP assessments compared to the public students' scores nationally.

. 2013 NAEP Grade 4 READING Basic Basic Student Subgroup All Students 8 6 26 22 33 30 33 42 White 11 10 33 31 34 34 21 25 Black 2 3 15 16 32 30 50 52 Hispanic 3 4 17 22 33 35 48 38 Asian American/Pacific Islander 18 3 33 15 28 31 21 51 American Indian/ Native 4 1 18 6 30 19 48 74 Eligible for Nat'l School Lunch Program 3 2 17 13 34 27 47 57 Students with Disabilities 2 1 9 6 20 16 69 78 English Language Learners 1 6 1 24 9 69 90 Rounds to zero READING Participation Rate Percentages Students with Disabilities 83 92 English Language Learners 92 97 2013 NAEP Grade 8 READING Basic Basic Student Subgroup All Students 4 3 31 28 42 40 23 29 White 5 5 39 39 41 40 15 16 Black 1 1 15 15 44 53 40 31 Hispanic 1 2 20 28 46 42 33 27 Asian American/Pacific Islander 9 2 41 21 35 43 15 34 American Indian/ Native 1 1 18 11 44 35 37 53 Eligible for Nat'l School Lunch Program 1 1 19 16 46 41 34 42 Students with Disabilities 8 5 30 26 62 69 English Language Learners 3 1 26 16 70 84 Rounds to zero READING Participation Rate Percentages Students with Disabilities 84 93 English Language Learners 90 96

2013 NAEP Grade 4 MATH Basic Basic Student Subgroup All Students 8 6 34 30 41 40 18 23 White 10 11 43 41 37 38 9 10 Black 1 2 17 20 48 50 34 28 Hispanic 2 3 24 30 47 44 27 23 Asian American/Pacific Islander 23 4 41 28 27 43 9 25 American Indian/ Native 2 1 22 12 46 37 30 50 Eligible for Nat'l School Lunch Program 2 2 23 20 47 43 27 35 Students with Disabilities 2 1 16 13 38 36 45 50 English Language Learners 1 13 8 45 27 41 65 Rounds to zero MATH Participation Rate Percentages Students with Disabilities 90 94 English Language Learners 96 98 2013 NAEP Grade 8 MATH Basic Basic Student Subgroup All Students 8 7 26 26 39 39 27 28 White 11 11 33 35 39 39 17 15 Black 2 4 12 17 38 38 49 42 Hispanic 3 4 18 20 41 46 38 30 Asian American/Pacific Islander 25 3 34 21 27 42 13 34 American Indian/ Native 3 2 18 13 38 35 40 49 Eligible for Nat'l School Lunch Program 3 2 17 17 41 38 39 43 Students with Disabilities 1 1 7 6 26 27 66 66 English Language Learners 1 4 2 25 21 69 78 Rounds to zero MATH Participation Rate Percentages Students with Disabilities 89 93 English Language Learners 93 98

Accountability Accountability Teacher Qualifications NCLB requires that all teachers who teach core subject area classes be highly qualified. Under rules approved by the Department of Education & Early Development, to be highly qualified a teacher must (1) have a posted major, the equivalent to a major (30 semester hours), advanced degree or advanced certification in the content area; (2) have passed a subject knowledge test(s) approved by the state (PRAXIS II); or (3) fulfill other requirements established by the state (HOUSSE). The District s Highly Qualified Teacher Plan was approved by the Department of Education and Early Development. The Plan outlines steps the District will take to assist teachers in their efforts to become Highly Qualified. Number of Teachers with Highest Degree Bachelors Masters Education Specialist Doctorate 111 66 0 0 School Core Classes Core Classes with Teachers with Teachers Schools are listed in order of highest Not Highly Highly poverty level (top) to lowest (bottom). Qualified Qualified Alak School, Wainwright 1 6.3 93.8 Meade River School, Atqasuk 1 0.0 100.0 Tikigaq School, Point Hope 0.0 100.0 Kali School, Point Lay 1 0.0 100.0 Nunamiut School, Anaktuvuk Pass 0.0 100.0 Kiita Learning Community, Barrow 0.0 100.0 Ipalook Elementary School, Barrow 0.0 100.0 Hopson Middle School, Barrow 0.0 100.0 Trapper School, Nuiqsut 0.0 100.0 Harold Kaveolook School, Kaktovik 0.0 100.0 Barrow High School, Barrow 0.0 100.0 All NSBSD 6.3 93.8 1 Title 1 School during 2013-14 school year Percentage of teachers in the district teaching with an Emergency Teacher Certificate is 0 because does not issue emergency certificates. The District had 0 Provisional Certficates. Additional information on teacher qualifications, including type of certification and college degree(s) is available from your school or district upon request. You may also request informaton on whether your child is provided service by paraprofessionals, and, if so, their qualifications.

Accountability School Performance Index Based on the School Performance Index (ASPI), gives each school a rating from one star to five stars. The ASPI index includes college and career ready indicators for schools with students in elementary and middle grade levels (K-8) and for schools with students in high school grade levels (9-12). The indicators receive different weights in the overall ASPI score as applicable to the different grade spans and most recently the alternative high schools. The academic achievement, school progress, and attendance rate indicators apply to all schools. At least 5 of the lowest performing Title I schools will be designated Priority Schools. At least 10 of the lowest performing Title I schools will be desginated Focus Schools; NSBSD does not have any Priority or School Performance Index Ratings Alak School, Wainwright Meade River School, Atqasuk Tikigaq School, Point Hope Kali School, Point Lay Nunamiut School, Anaktuvuk Pass Kiita Learning Community, Barrow Ipalook Elementary School, Barrow Hopson Middle School, Barrow Trapper School, Nuiqsut Harold Kaveolook School, Kaktovik Barrow High School, Barrow North Slope Borough School District Title I School: Two-Star Rating Title I School: One-Star Rating Two- Star Rating Title I School: Two-Star Rating Two-Star Rating Two-Star Rating Three-Star Rating Three-Star Rating One-Star Rating Three-Star Rating Three-Star Rating Teir III District - having 50 or more one- or two-star schools Schools Identified for Improvement for 2013-2014 Percent of District Schools Identified for Improvement: 100 CONSEQUENCES FOR ASPI STAR RATING All 1- and 2-star schools: District shall develop and implement school improvement plan to be submitted to EED, and notify parents. All 3-star schools: School shall prepare and implement a school plan, and notify parents. All 4- and 5-star schools: Schools must prepare a plan if: fail to meet AMO (2 years in a row); graduation rate declines; or participation rate falls less than 95 Tier I district: District having less than 25 one- or two-star schools. Receive universal level of support available to all schools and district. Tier II district: District having 25-49 one- or two-star schools. Receive state support, ovewrsight and technical assistance tailored to the needs of the district/schools. Tier III district: District having 50 or more one- or two-star schools. Receive the most state support based on student acheivement data. Receive a timetable to work on deficienies within district. Receive technical assistance tailored to the needs of the district and schools. Intervention by EED is possible if schools are not making progress and/or plans are not implemented as approved. The District is taking appropriate actions to improve curriculum and instruction, as well as providing the professional development activities necessary to support our efforts to improve student achievement. The 2013-14 District Improvement Plan was approved by the Department of Education and Early Development.

Accountability Attendance & Graduation Rates Student Subgroups Attendance Rate State 95 Graduation Rate State 90 All Students Male Female Native/American Indian Caucasian Asian/Pacific Islander African American Hispanic 86.2 48.1 86.1 46.2 86.3 50.0 85.0 40.0 92.3 50.0 91.9 85.7 96.3 NA 89.0 80.0 Multi-Ethnic 88.6 85.7 LEP Students Not LEP Students Econ. Disadvantaged Not Econ. Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Students without Disabilities Migrant Students Not Migrant Students 86.1 13.8 86.1 60.8 85.3 48.6 86.9 45.9 86.2 15.4 86.1 52.1 NA NA 86.2 48.1 Attendance percentages are based on students enrolled in grades K-12. Results are not published when there are fewer than five students in a subgroup. N/A indicates there are no students in this subgroup. Detailed assessment and ASPI results for school districts is available on the Department of Education & Early Development website. For assessment results at the state, district, or school level, go to: http://www.education.alaska.gov/tls/assessment/results.html For ASPI information for districts and schools, go to: http://www.eed.state.ak.us/akaccountability/ Individual school report cards are available from the school, district office, or on the NSBSD website at: www.nsbsd.org

Annual Measurable Objectives Accountability The new accountability system features two components: The School Performance Index (ASPI) and Annual Measureable Objective (AMO) targets. It effectively replaced the former Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) system that had been in place since 2002. The previous AYP system included goals set by the state and referred to a targeted percentage of students in grades 3 through 10 who performed at the proficient level or better on last year s state tests of language arts and mathematics. The new AMO targets are unique to each school, district, and subgroup based on their baseline year performance.

2013 2014 Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) Progress Report Department of Education & Early Development Prepared on August 28, 2014 District: North Slope Borough School District Reading Writing Math Subgroup 1 State District Percent of FAY Students or Above 3 Reading Met? 4 State District Percent of FAY Students or Above 3 Writing Met? 4 State District Percent of FAY Students or Above 3 All Students 83.83 65.50 57.96 No 79.17 59.00 46.85 No 74.50 59.42 43.97 No African American 78.67 N/A 80.00 Yes 73.50 N/A 40.00 N/A 62.67 N/A 20.00 N/A Native & American Indian 66.08 60.92 49.93 No 59.92 54.50 38.03 No 57.75 55.25 36.08 No Asian & Pacific Islander 81.00 81.75 80.90 No 78.58 71.33 73.03 Yes 74.08 71.33 74.16 Yes Caucasian 92.08 94.25 96.88 Yes 87.75 85.67 93.55 Yes 82.75 85.67 83.87 Yes Hispanic 84.17 91.67 100.00 Yes 79.92 100.00 100.00 Yes 72.75 83.33 80.00 Yes Two or more races 85.50 75.92 78.89 Yes 80.75 69.92 70.93 Yes 75.75 71.92 60.67 No Economically Disadvantaged 74.33 58.92 47.37 No 68.75 51.67 34.09 No 64.17 53.42 30.60 No Students w/disabilities (SWD) 2 57.42 36.50 23.94 No 52.33 32.83 19.31 No 47.50 37.50 16.55 No Limited English (LEP) 2 53.33 48.42 39.73 No 50.08 42.77 29.79 No 48.75 46.58 30.27 No Math Met? 4 Subgroup Participation Rate Attendance Rate Graduation Rate Enrolled Rate () Met? 6 Rate Met? 6 4 Year Rate 5 Year Rate All Students 1,020 99.31 Yes 86.19 No 48.15 71.56 No African American 5 100.00 Yes 96.33 Yes N/A 100.00 Yes Native & American Indian Met? 7 787 99.24 Yes 84.95 No 40.00 65.88 No Asian & Pacific Islander 93 100.00 Yes 91.94 No 85.71 100.00 Yes Caucasian 34 97.06 Yes 92.31 No 50.00 88.89 Yes Hispanic 7 100.00 Yes 89.00 No 80.00 0.00 Yes Two or more races 94 100.00 Yes 88.59 No 85.71 100.00 Yes Economically Disadvantaged 450 98.89 Yes 85.33 No 48.65 58.82 No Students w/disabilities (SWD) 2 144 100.00 Yes 86.19 No 15.38 50.00 No Limited English (LEP) 2 309 99.35 Yes 86.10 No 13.79 57.69 No NOTES: 1. If a subgroup has fewer than five students enrolled in tested grades, "N/A" has been entered for the proficiency percentage and Met? fields. 2. Students with Disabilities (SWD) and Limited English (LEP) subgroups include assessment scores of former SWD and former LEP students that are being monitored for two years. 3. Proficiency percentage is based on "Full Academic Year" (FAY) students enrolled from October 1 through the first day of testing in spring 2014. 4. The AMO target is met if either the state or the district target has been met. 5. The participation rate target is 95 percent if the number of enrolled students is greater than 40. If the number of enrolled students is 40 or less, all but two students must test. Subgroups with fewer than five students will reflect "N/A in the Met? field. 6. The attendance rate target is 95 percent for the district as a whole and for each subgroup with at least five students enrolled. 7. The graduation rate target is 90 percent for the district as a whole and for each subgroup with at least five members if the district enrolls students in grade 12. A district or subgroup with 10 or fewer students in the graduation cohort satisfies the graduation rate requirement if all but one of those students graduates.