State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR TM ) On-Track Measure Questions and Answers

Similar documents
Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Linking the Ohio State Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Evaluation of Teach For America:

School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Norms How were TerraNova 3 norms derived? Does the norm sample reflect my diverse school population?

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Shelters Elementary School

success. It will place emphasis on:

Pre-Algebra A. Syllabus. Course Overview. Course Goals. General Skills. Credit Value

WINSTON CHURCHILL HIGH SCHOOL. 9 th Grade Registration Information

Testing for the Homeschooled High Schooler: SAT, ACT, AP, CLEP, PSAT, SAT II

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Are You Ready? Simplify Fractions

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

The New York City Department of Education. Grade 5 Mathematics Benchmark Assessment. Teacher Guide Spring 2013

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013

Grade 6: Correlated to AGS Basic Math Skills

Financing Education In Minnesota

Bittinger, M. L., Ellenbogen, D. J., & Johnson, B. L. (2012). Prealgebra (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Wave III Education Data

Heritage High School Home of the Coyotes. Class of 2017 Registration for Senior Classes

Interpreting ACER Test Results

TESTING. Who Must Take the TSI Assessment Exam? Who Does Not Have to Take the TSI Assessment Exam? When Must a Student Take the TSI Assessment Exam?

GradinG SyStem IE-SMU MBA

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS

Cooper Upper Elementary School

International Advanced level examinations

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

Many instructors use a weighted total to calculate their grades. This lesson explains how to set up a weighted total using categories.

QUESTIONS and Answers from Chad Rice?

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

6 Financial Aid Information

Guide to the Uniform mark scale (UMS) Uniform marks in A-level and GCSE exams

Pearson Mymathlab Answer Key Math 110 Amu

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

Table of Contents PROCEDURES

PreAP Geometry. Ms. Patricia Winkler

Course Policies and Syllabus BUL3130 The Legal, Ethical, and Social Aspects of Business Syllabus Spring A 2017 ONLINE

School Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide

Math Grade 3 Assessment Anchors and Eligible Content

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Grade 5 + DIGITAL. EL Strategies. DOK 1-4 RTI Tiers 1-3. Flexible Supplemental K-8 ELA & Math Online & Print

AGS THE GREAT REVIEW GAME FOR PRE-ALGEBRA (CD) CORRELATED TO CALIFORNIA CONTENT STANDARDS

BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE ACADEMY WEEKLY INSTRUCTIONAL AGENDA 8 th Grade 02/20/ /24/2017

Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring SOSCA. Feedback Information

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

learning collegiate assessment]

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

OPTIMIZATINON OF TRAINING SETS FOR HEBBIAN-LEARNING- BASED CLASSIFIERS

Cooper Upper Elementary School

University of Exeter College of Humanities. Assessment Procedures 2010/11

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

AIS/RTI Mathematics. Plainview-Old Bethpage

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

2 nd grade Task 5 Half and Half

West Haven School District English Language Learners Program

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Mathematics Levels 12 14

Smiley Face Feedback Form

This scope and sequence assumes 160 days for instruction, divided among 15 units.

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

2014 State Residency Conference Frequently Asked Questions FAQ Categories

Jefferson County School District Testing Plan

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

NCEO Technical Report 27

Corpus Linguistics (L615)

Pleasant Hill Elementary

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

End-of-Module Assessment Task K 2

South Carolina English Language Arts

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

Lecture 1: Machine Learning Basics

Introduction to Ensemble Learning Featuring Successes in the Netflix Prize Competition

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Assessment booklet Assessment without levels and new GCSE s

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Georgia Department of Education

S T A T 251 C o u r s e S y l l a b u s I n t r o d u c t i o n t o p r o b a b i l i t y

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

IB Diploma Subject Selection Brochure

Quantitative Research Questionnaire

English Policy Statement and Syllabus Fall 2017 MW 10:00 12:00 TT 12:15 1:00 F 9:00 11:00

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

Platform for the Development of Accessible Vocational Training

General Microbiology (BIOL ) Course Syllabus

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

Distinguished Teacher Review

Background Checks and Pennsylvania Act 153 of 2014 Compliance. Frequently Asked Questions

Probability Therefore (25) (1.33)

Transcription:

State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR TM ) Measure Questions and Answers Defining the STAAR Measure 1. What is the STAAR on-track measure? The STAAR on-track measure provides information about whether a student is on track to be at or above the Level II standard in a future target year. Whether a student is on track or not is measured by using a student s gain score (the difference between the score a student achieved in the prior year and the score a student achieved in the current year). Individual students are then categorized as Not or toward the target year. 2. For what standards is the STAAR on-track measure calculated? In 2014, the STAAR on-track measure is calculated and reported for all of the Level II standards. This includes the phase-in 1, phase-in 2, and final recommended Level II standards. 3. For what grades and content areas is the STAAR on-track measure reported? The STAAR on-track measure will be reported for students in grades 4 through high school in reading/english and mathematics. In 2014, on-track measures are available only for reading in grades 4 7 and in mathematics for grades 4 8. The STAAR on-track measure will also be available for Algebra I and English II in future years. In order to calculate the STAAR on-track measure, three assessments covering the same content area must be available (previous year, current year, and target year). For example, on track can be calculated for grade 8 mathematics (current year assessment) because the previous year assessment was grade 7 mathematics and the target year assessment will be Algebra I, all three of these assessments measure mathematics. However, on track cannot be calculated for grade 8 reading because the next assessment in a traditional course-taking sequence will be English I, which includes both reading and writing content. Therefore, although the previous year assessment (grade 7 reading) and the current year assessment (grade 8 reading) cover the same content area, the target year assessment (English I) covers additional content and an on track measure cannot be calculated. In addition, the STAAR on-track measure cannot be calculated for English I since the previous year assessment (grade 8 reading) covers different content. 4. What are the STAAR on-track target years? The STAAR on-track measure target years are grade 5, grade 8, and STAAR end of course (EOC) assessments. The following table lists the current year assessment and the corresponding on-track target assessment for which the STAAR on-track measure is calculated. Italicized assessments are those where the STAAR on-track measure is not available in 2014 but will be available in future years. Spring 2014 Texas Education Agency Page 1 of 8

Mathematics English Reading / English Spanish Reading Target Target Target Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 5 Grade 8 Grade 5 Grade 8 Grade 6 Grade 8 Grade 6 Grade 8 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 8 Algebra I English II English III Algebra I Algebra II 5. How are the STAAR on-track classifications (Not and ) determined for vertically-scaled tests? The method for measuring on-track takes into account the differences between the performance standards on the vertical scale. This method assumes that gain scores observed this year will be repeated proportionately to the changes in the Level II standards (phase-in 1, phase-in 2, and final recommended) in future years. The STAAR on-track measure acknowledges that the changes in the standards across the vertical scale are not uniform and adjusts the expected gain accordingly for future years. Not Student s Prior Year Target Year L-II Standard Gain score required to be ( Value ) The STAAR on-track classifications are determined by comparing a student s gain score the difference between the student s current year score and prior year score to a target gain score ( Value ). See question 10 for more information about the calculation of the STAAR ontrack measure. 6. How are the STAAR on-track classifications (Not and ) determined for EOC assessments? The STAAR on-track measure for Algebra I is calculated using a z-score approach because grade 7 and 8 scores are measured on a different scale than that of Algebra I. Rather than using the units of the scales, which in this case are different from grades 7 and 8 to Algebra I, a z-score converts scores into standard deviation units that can be compared regardless of scale. Thus, student scores from Spring 2014 Texas Education Agency Page 2 of 8

grades 7 and 8 mathematics and the Algebra I Level II performance standard are converted to a z- score scale as follows: z = student score LII standard standard deviation This puts all of the values on the same scale so that an on-track measure can be generated. For example, Not Prior Year Gr 7 z-score Gr 8 z-score Algebra I Target z-score Gain scores can be measured on the z-score scale. If the gain score from grade 7 to grade 8 is repeated from grade 8 to Algebra I and the student achieves the target at the Level II standard, then the student is. This method is currently used to calculate the STAAR on-track measure for grade 8 mathematics, and will also be used to calculate the STAAR on-track measure in future years for Algebra I and English II. This approach determines the gain needed to be on track by equally dividing the distance between grade 7 to grade 8 and grade 8 to Algebra I. It is not necessary to divide the distance proportionally, as is the vertical-scale approach used for on-track to grades 5 and 8, because the z-score conversion already accounts for any non-uniform change in the Level II standards. 7. Are there any exceptions to the Not and definitions described above? Yes. There are some places on the STAAR scale, specifically at the extreme high and low ends of the scale, where the application of the Not and definitions would not be appropriate. At the extreme ends of the scale, unlike the rest of the scale, answering one more question correctly results in large differences in scale scores. For this reason, several places on the scale have been identified as exceptions to the Not and definitions. Students who maintained Level III performance from the prior year to the current year will be classified as being to all Level II standards in the target year. Students scoring at or below chance in the current year will be classified as being Not On Track to all Level II standards in the target year. Chance represents the score that could be reasonably obtained by guessing alone. For the reading and mathematics tests, chance is defined as ¼, or 25%, of the possible multiple-choice raw-score points since these questions have four answer options. The end of course (EOC) English tests also include short answer questions and essays that are then weighted and combined to compute the total-test score. For these tests, chance is defined as ¼, or 25%, of the possible multiple-choice points, plus the weighted value associated with summed scores of 2 on the essays (representing a rubric score of 1 from both readers), and scores of zero on the short answer questions. Spring 2014 Texas Education Agency Page 3 of 8

Applying the STAAR Measure 8. Is on-track measured for all students in Texas? On-track is measured only for students who take STAAR assessments. In 2014, there is no on-track measure for STAAR Modified, STAAR Alternate, or English language learners (ELLs) who test in English and are eligible for the ELL progress measure. No on-track measure is available for STAAR Modified since 2014 is the last year the STAAR Modified assessments will be administered. In 2016, after two years of data are available, the on-track measure can be calculated for the redesigned STAAR Alternate assessments. The ELL progress measure already incorporates on-track information so no additional indicator is needed. 9. Why do some students not receive an on-track measure? Only students who receive the STAAR progress measure receive the on-track measure. For the eligibility criteria for the STAAR progress measure, see the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) Progress Measure Questions and Answers document located at: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/workarea/linkit.aspx?linkidentifier=id&itemid=25769806844&libid=25 769806847 10. How can I calculate my student s STAAR on-track measure? In order to calculate a student s on-track measure, the following information is needed: Test information from the current year, including o STAAR progress measure o Grade level o Content area o Test language (English or Spanish) o Scale score o Level II performance standards (phase-in 1, phase-in 2, and final recommended) Test information from the prior year, including o Grade level o Content area o Test language (English or Spanish) o Scale score o Level II performance standards (phase-in 1, phase-in 2, and final recommended) Test information for the target, including o Grade level o Content area o Test language (English or Spanish) o Level II performance standards (phase-in 1, phase-in 2, and final recommended) Gain score = Current-year scale score Prior-year scale score Gain Score Spring 2014 Texas Education Agency Page 4 of 8

The following five steps are used to calculate on track for the Level II standard of interest. The five steps can be repeated to determine on track for each of the three Level II standards phase-in 1, phase-in 2, and final recommended. 1. Calculate the distance in scale score points that the student must progress from the prior year to the target year (Distance = Target year Level II standard Previous year scale score). Target Year Distance 2. Calculate the distance between the Level II standards from the prior year to the target year (Standards Distance = Target year Level II standard Previous year Level II standard). Target Year Standards Distance 3. Determine the proportion of the change in standards from the previous year to the current year (1 st year proportion = Current year Level II standard previous year Level II standard / Standards Distance). Current year Level II Previous year Level II /Standards Distance 4. Find the amount of gain that a student must achieve from the previous year to the current year in order to be to the target year ( Value = 1 st year proportion * Distance). Target Year Level II Standard Not Value Spring 2014 Texas Education Agency Page 5 of 8

5. Compare the student s gain score to the Value. If the gain score is greater than or equal to the Value, then the student is classified as. Otherwise, the student is classified as Not. Gain Score Not Target Year Level II Standard Value The following example shows in detail how the STAAR on-track measure is calculated for determining whether a grade 4 mathematics student is or Not to the final recommended level II standard of for grade 5 mathematics. In the example below, the student characteristics are as follows Grade Level II Final Standard Prior Year 3 1325 1529 4 1492 1599 Target Year 5 - Gain Score = 1492-1325 = 167 1325 1492 1. Calculate the distance in scale score points that the student must progress from the prior year to the target year. (Distance = Target year level II standard Previous year scale score = 1325 = 302) 1325 Distance = 302 2. Calculate the distance between the Level II standards from the prior year to the target year (Standards Distance = Target year Level II standard Previous year Level II standard = 1529 = 98). 1529 1325 Standards Distance = 98 Spring 2014 Texas Education Agency Page 6 of 8

3. Determine the proportion of the change in standards from the previous year to the current year (1 st year proportion = Current year Level II standard previous year Level II standard / Standards Distance = (1599 1529)/98 = 0.714). 1325 1529 1599 1 st year proportion = (1599 1529)/98 = 0.714 4. Find the amount of gain that a student must achieve from the previous year to the current year in order to be to the target year ( Value = 1 st year proportion * Distance = 0.714*302 = 216). 1325 Not Value= 216 5. Compare the student s gain score to the Value. Here, the gain score is not greater than the Value (167 < 216), therefore the grade 4 mathematics student is Not On Track to the grade 5 final recommended level II standard of. Gain Score = 167 Not Value= 216 Repeat this five-step process using the phase-in 1 and phase-in 2 Level II values in place of the final recommended Level II values to determine whether the student is on track to the grade 5 mathematics phase-in 1 and phase-in 2 Level II values. Reporting the STAAR Measure 11. How will the STAAR on-track measure be made available? In 2014, the STAAR on-track measure for phase-in 1, phase-in 2, and final recommended Level II will be included in district accountability files and within the district view of the student data portal. This information will not be reported on Confidential Student Reports (CSRs). Spring 2014 Texas Education Agency Page 7 of 8

Interpreting the STAAR Measure 12. How is the STAAR on-track measure useful to parents, teachers, and administrators? Scale scores and performance levels convey information about how a student performed in the current year. Progress measures communicate how much the student has improved from the prior year to the current year. The STAAR on-track measure provides additional information by determining whether the student s current performance level combined with the student s progress from last year to this year has the student on track to reach Level II performance (phase-in 1, phasein 2, and final recommended standards) in the target year. When used together, this information provides a more complete picture of the student s achievement. For example, a student may have achieved the phase-in 1 Level II standard and Met progress, but the student may not be to the phase-in 2 or final Level II standards in the target year. This information could help parents, teachers, and administrators identify students for early interventions to prevent them from falling behind in the future. STAAR Measure and Accountability 13. Is the STAAR on-track measure used for accountability? No. The STAAR on-track measure is not included in the accountability system. Development of STAAR Measure 14. Why did Texas develop and implement the STAAR on-track measure? Texas Education Code 39.034(d) mandates the development of a measure to determine the necessary annual amount of improvement required for a student to be prepared to perform satisfactorily on grade 5, grade 8, and EOC assessments. To meet these requirements, the Texas Education Agency developed the STAAR on-track measure. In doing so, the goal was to provide additional information about student performance that builds upon the existing STAAR progress measure. Spring 2014 Texas Education Agency Page 8 of 8