School Report Card for School Year

Similar documents
Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Shelters Elementary School

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Data Diskette & CD ROM

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

State of New Jersey

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

University of Arizona

Best Colleges Main Survey

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

46 Children s Defense Fund

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

12-month Enrollment

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

African American Male Achievement Update

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

El Toro Elementary School

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Raw Data Files Instructions

Bellehaven Elementary

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Educational Attainment


Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

LIM College New York, NY

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

Transportation Equity Analysis

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Legislative Counsel Bureau and Nevada Legislature 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV Equal Opportunity Employer

Hokulani Elementary School

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Communities in Schools of Virginia

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

PEIMS Submission 1 list

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Application for Postgraduate Studies (Research)

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

A Diverse Student Body

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

Level 1 Mathematics and Statistics, 2015

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

Kahului Elementary School

Transcription:

Report Card for 212-213 Year : Glennallen Elementary : Copper River Gradespan: K-5 Enrollment: 19 ASPI Score: 88.15 Star Rating: 4 Title I? No Title I Program: ed Assistance Accreditation: No A Title I school receives federal money to support low-achieving students. A wide Title I Program uses the money to improve the education for all students. A ed Assistance Title I Program uses the money to provide help for students who need it most. This Report Card presents information about the school s performance for the 212-213 school year. In May 213, Alaska received permission to replace the Adequate Yearly Progress system of No Child Left Behind with a new state system. The new accountability system is based on two prongs: the Alaska Performance Index (ASPI) for schools and the Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) targets for schools, districts, and the state. Under ASPI, each school receives a score on a 1-point scale and a star rating from 5-stars (highest) to 1-star. The ASPI score and star rating give an overall picture of how well the school is doing to prepare the students to be college-, career- and culturally ready graduates. The AMO targets have been revised with the goal that each school will reduce the percent of students not proficient on the reading, writing, and math tests by half at the end of six years. Each school will receive a report every year showing the percentage of students that were proficient on each test and whether the school has met the targets for the year. Copies of the 213 ASPI Report and the 213 AMO Report are found at the end of this Report Card. More information about the new system and the ASPI and AMO reports for schools can be found on the Department of Education & Early Development website at: education.alaska.gov. Click on the green star or the Accountability tab to find the ASPI and AMO reports. Click on the orange star or Support tab to find information about how schools are supported in writing and implementing school improvement plans. The Report Card and Report Cards are available from the school or district at: or on the district website at: Glennallen Elementary or Office www.crsd.us Form #5-14-1 Report Card Template 212-213 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Page 1

Information on Qualifications of Teachers Number of Teachers With Highest Degree: Bachelors Masters Ed Specialist Doctorate 5 3 Additional information on teacher qualifications, including type of certification and college degree(s) is available from your school or district upon request. You may also request information on whether your child is provided service by paraprofessionals, and, if so, their qualifications. Percentage of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers 1 The percentage of teachers in the school teaching with an Emergency Teacher Certificate is. Alaska does not issue emergency certificates to teachers. Other Information Grades KG-8 Retention Rate: 2.3 Number of High Graduates: Percentage Diploma HSGQE Waiver: Number of Diploma HSGQE Waiver: Grades 7-12 Dropout Rate: Number of Grade 7-12 Dropouts: Enrollment Change: 16.16 Enrollment Change Due to Transfers: 2.75 Students Survey Return Rate: 48.5 Parents Survey Return Rate: 57.6 Students Commenting: Parents Commenting: 28 Average Volunteer Hours Per Week: 1 Community Members Commenting: Persistently Dangerous : No /Business Partnerships: 22 Form #5-14-1 Report Card Template 212-213 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Page 2

All Students Tested Grades 3 1 READING Advanced Below Far Below Total ested Percent Tested Student Subgroup ALL STUDENTS 38.3 4.1 35.6 5 44.1 42.7 8.3 12.7 15.4 3.3 3 6.4 6 1 1 98 Female 47.1 47.3 39.8 47.1 42 42.2 2.9 8 13.1 2.9 2.7 4.9 34 1 99 98 Male 26.9 32.9 31.5 53.8 46.3 43.1 15.4 17.4 17.6 3.8 3.4 7.8 26 1 1 98 African American NA * 23.4 NA * 47.8 NA * 2.8 NA * 7.9 NA NA * 98 Alaska Native/American Indian 22.2 18.3 15 61.1 56 4.9 16.7 22 29 3.7 15.1 18 1 99 98 Asian/Pacific Islander * 22.2 27.7 * 55.6 47.2 * 11.1 19.3 * 11.1 5.9 * * 1 98 Caucasian 5 55.2 48.1 41.7 34.4 4.9 5.6 8 8.3 2.8 2.5 2.7 36 1 1 97 Hispanic NA 1 3.5 NA 48.7 NA 15.5 NA 5.4 NA NA * 98 Multi-Ethnic * 35.7 34.7 * 64.3 46.4 * 14 * 4.8 * * 1 98 Economically Disadvantaged 25 3.1 21.6 6 45.6 45.1 5 17.5 23 1 6.8 1.3 2 1 1 98 NOT Economically Disadvantaged 45 45.4 47.9 45 43.4 4.5 1 1.2 8.7 1 2.8 4 1 99 98 Students with Disabilities * 3.4 7.6 * 44.8 33 * 31 35.6 * 2.7 23.8 * * 1 97 Students WITHOUT Disabilities 39.3 44.1 39.7 51.8 44.1 44.1 8.9 1.7 12.4 1.1 3.8 56 1 1 98 LEP Students NA NA 3.3 NA NA 29.2 NA NA 42.3 NA NA 25.2 NA NA NA 97 NOT LEP Students 38.3 4.1 39.5 5 44.1 44.3 8.3 12.7 12.2 3.3 3 4.1 6 1 1 98 Migrant students * * 21 * * 44.3 * * 24 * * 1.7 * * * 98 NOT Migrant students 39 4.7 36.8 49.2 44.4 42.5 8.5 11.9 14.7 3.4 3.1 6 59 1 1 98 All Students Tested Grades 3 1 WRITING Advanced Below Far Below Total ested Percent Tested Student Subgroup ALL STUDENTS 33.3 24.1 19.5 5 56.2 54.3 16.7 18.4 21.7 1.3 4.6 6 1 1 98 Female 38.2 32 24.6 5 56 55.5 11.8 12 17.2 2.7 34 1 99 98 Male 26.9 16.1 14.5 5 56.4 53.3 23.1 24.8 25.9 2.7 6.3 26 1 1 98 African American NA * 12.7 NA * 53.9 NA * 27.9 NA * 5.5 NA NA * 98 Alaska Native/American Indian 22.2 8.3 6.9 5 62.4 43.1 27.8 26.6 39 2.8 1.9 18 1 99 98 Asian/Pacific Islander * 22.2 17.4 * 66.7 56.5 * 11.1 22.4 * 3.8 * * 1 97 Caucasian 38.9 35.6 26.2 47.2 48.5 58.4 13.9 15.3 13.3.6 2.1 36 1 1 98 Hispanic NA 5 16.9 NA 5 57.9 NA 21.8 NA 3.4 NA NA * 98 Multi-Ethnic * 14.3 2.8 * 85.7 55.7 * 2.3 * 3.2 * * 1 98 Economically Disadvantaged 3 18.4 11.3 45 53.4 5.1 25 25.2 31.4 2.9 7.2 2 1 1 98 NOT Economically Disadvantaged 35 27 26.7 52.5 57.7 58 12.5 14.8 13.5 2.2 4 1 99 98 Students with Disabilities * 3.4 * 41.4 33.6 * 48.3 46.4 * 1.3 16.7 * * 1 97 Students WITHOUT Disabilities 35.7 26.7 21.8 5 57.8 57.4 14.3 15.2 18.4 2.8 56 1 1 98 LEP Students NA NA 2.4 NA NA 27.6 NA NA 53.8 NA NA 16.1 NA NA NA 97 NOT LEP Students 33.3 24.1 21.5 5 56.2 57.6 16.7 18.4 17.8 1.3 3.1 6 1 1 98 Migrant students * * 1.4 * * 49.2 * * 32.7 * * 7.6 * * * 98 NOT Migrant students 33.9 24.4 2.2 5.8 56.9 54.8 15.3 17.6 2.7 1 4.3 59 1 1 98 Form #5-14-1 Report Card Template 212-213 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Page 3

All Students Tested Grades 3 1 MATHEMATICS Advanced Below Far Below Total ested Percent Tested Student Subgroup ALL STUDENTS 43.3 37.8 32.5 45 42.5 36.9 3.3 12 15.9 8.3 7.7 14.6 6 1 1 98 Female 47.1 41.3 33 41.2 4.7 37.7 2.9 1 15.8 8.8 8 13.4 34 1 99 98 Male 38.5 34.2 32 5 44.3 36.2 3.8 14.1 16 7.7 7.4 15.8 26 1 1 98 African American NA * 19.7 NA * 36.5 NA * 2.6 NA * 23.1 NA NA * 98 Alaska Native/American Indian 5 22.9 16 38.9 53.2 33.2 5.6 17.4 22 5.6 6.4 28.9 18 1 99 98 Asian/Pacific Islander * 22.2 3.9 * 66.7 38.3 * 16.7 * 11.1 14 * * 1 99 Caucasian 41.7 47.2 42 47.2 33.7 37.9 2.8 9.8 12.3 8.3 9.2 7.8 36 1 1 98 Hispanic NA 5 26.8 NA 5 39.4 NA 18.5 NA 15.3 NA NA * 98 Multi-Ethnic * 57.1 32.9 * 35.7 38.3 * 7.1 16.2 * 12.6 * * 1 98 Economically Disadvantaged 3 33 2.6 5 41.7 36.6 5 14.6 2.4 15 1.7 22.4 2 1 1 98 NOT Economically Disadvantaged 5 4.3 43 42.5 42.9 37.2 2.5 1.7 12 5 6.1 7.8 4 1 99 98 Students with Disabilities * 3.4 7.5 * 24.1 24.5 * 31 24.1 * 41.4 43.9 * * 1 97 Students WITHOUT Disabilities 44.6 41.5 36.2 46.4 44.4 38.8 3.6 1 14.7 5.4 4.1 1.3 56 1 1 98 LEP Students NA NA 5.3 NA NA 25.5 NA NA 24.8 NA NA 44.3 NA NA NA 98 NOT LEP Students 43.3 37.8 35.8 45 42.5 38.3 3.3 12 14.8 8.3 7.7 11 6 1 1 98 Migrant students * * 22.2 * * 36.7 * * 19.3 * * 21.9 * * * 98 NOT Migrant students 44.1 38.3 33.3 44.1 42.4 37 3.4 12.2 15.7 8.5 7.1 14 59 1 1 98 All Students Tested Grades 4, 8, & 1 SCIENCE Advanced Below Far Below Total ested Percent Tested Student Subgroup ALL STUDENTS 1 31.1 27.4 35 38.5 29.9 45 19.7 23.1 1 1.7 19.7 2 1 1 95 Female 1 28.1 25.2 3 37.5 3.6 4 21.9 24.8 2 12.5 19.5 1 1 1 95 Male 1 34.5 29.4 4 39.7 29.2 5 17.2 21.5 8.6 19.9 1 1 1 95 African American NA 11.6 NA 1 28.9 NA 3.8 NA 28.8 NA NA * 96 Alaska Native/American Indian * 9.5 1.5 * 38.1 2.6 * 28.6 28.2 * 23.8 4.7 * * 1 94 Asian/Pacific Islander NA 33.3 18 NA 66.7 27.8 NA 28.6 NA 25.5 NA NA * 97 Caucasian 14.3 43.7 38.8 42.9 38 33.7 42.9 14.1 18.1 4.2 9.3 14 1 1 95 Hispanic NA NA 2.3 NA NA 31.1 NA NA 28.2 NA NA 2.4 NA NA NA 97 Multi-Ethnic * 4 25.6 * 2 33.3 * 4 26.5 * 14.6 * * * 95 Economically Disadvantaged 17.6 14.2 33.3 35.3 25.4 5 26.5 29.1 16.7 2.6 31.3 6 1 1 95 NOT Economically Disadvantaged 14.3 36.4 38.2 35.7 39.8 33.5 42.9 17 18.2 7.1 6.8 1.1 14 1 1 96 Students with Disabilities * 6.8 * 37.5 18.1 * 12.5 26.8 * 5 48.3 * * 1 94 Students WITHOUT Disabilities 1.5 33.3 3.3 31.6 38.6 31.5 47.4 2.2 22.6 1.5 7.9 15.7 19 1 1 95 LEP Students NA NA 1.4 NA NA 6 NA NA 26 NA NA 66.6 NA NA NA 95 NOT LEP Students 1 31.1 3.2 35 38.5 32.5 45 19.7 22.8 1 1.7 14.6 2 1 1 95 Migrant students NA NA 14.8 NA NA 25.4 NA NA 29.3 NA NA 3.4 NA NA NA 96 NOT Migrant students 1 31.1 28.4 35 38.5 3.2 45 19.7 22.6 1 1.7 18.8 2 1 1 95 Form #5-14-1 Report Card Template 212-213 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Page 4

Two-Year Trend for Students Scoring or Above by Grade Level READING ASSESSMENTS WRITING ASSESSMENTS 1th 1th 9th 9th 8th 8th Grade Level 7th 6th Grade Level 7th 6th 5th 5th 4th 4th 3rd 3rd 2 4 6 8 1 Reading 12 13 Reading 11 12 2 4 6 8 1 Writing 12 13 Writing 11 12 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS 1th 9th 1th 8th Grade Level 7th 6th Grade Level 8th 5th 4th 4th 3rd 2 4 6 8 1 Math 12 13 Math 11 12 2 4 6 8 1 Science 12 13 Science 11 12 Form #5-14-1 Report Card Template 212-213 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Page 5

FALL 212 HSGQE Reading Writing Mathematics 11 * * * * * * * * * * * * 12 * * * * * * * * * * * * All Grades * * * * * * * * * * * * SPRING 213 HSGQE Reading Writing Mathematics 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * 11 * * * * * * * * * * * * 12 * * * * * * * * * * * * All Grades * * * * * * * * * * * * TerraNova - Reading Top Quartile Third Quartile Second Quartile Bottom Quartile 76-99 51-75 26-5 1-25 # # # # National Percentile Rank 5 21 28.6 21 28.6 21 28.6 21 38.1 67 7 * * * * * * * * * All Grades * * * * * * * * * TerraNova - Language Top Quartile Third Quartile Second Quartile Bottom Quartile 76-99 51-75 26-5 1-25 # # # # National Percentile Rank 5 21 28.6 21 9.5 21 33.3 21 28.6 62 7 * * * * * * * * * All Grades * * * * * * * * * TerraNova - Mathematics Top Quartile Third Quartile Second Quartile Bottom Quartile 76-99 51-75 26-5 1-25 # # # # National Percentile Rank 5 21 23.8 21 19. 21 42.9 21 14.3 57 7 * * * * * * * * * All Grades * * * * * * * * * Form #5-14-1 Report Card Template 212-213 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Page 6

ASPI Rating: **** ALASKA SCHOOL PERFORMANCE INDEX (ASPI): 212-213 Copper River Glennallen Elementary Grade Span PK - 6 Participation Rate Grades 3-1 6 Number Enrolled Number Tested Participation Rate 6 1 Met Participation Rate Yes Points None, acts as a trigger to achievement denominator. K-8 Performance Academic Achievement Progress (Subgroup must have 5> students to be considered) Reading Writing Count Pct Proficent Count Pct Proficent 53 88 5 83 53 88 95.73 9.26 86.33 Count Math Pct Proficent Growth All Growth-AK Native Growth-Econ Dis Growth-w/Disabilities Growth-LEP Points Weighting ASPI Points 87..35 3.45 94.24.4 37.7 Attendance Rate 91.81 8..25 2. 9-12 Performance Academic Achievement Progress (Subgroup must have 5> students to be considered) Reading Writing Math Count Pct Proficent Count Pct Proficent Count Pct Proficent Growth All Growth -AK Native Growth-Econ Dis Growth-w/Disabilities Growth-LEP Total K-8 Points 1. 88.15 Points Weighting ASPI Points.. Attendance Rate. Graduation Rate College Career Readiness WorkKeys Participation 4 Year 5 Year ^ - Results are suppressed to protect individual confidentiality. - Results do not meet minimum reporting thresholds or no students of the reported grade level were served. Total 9-12 Points K-8 Enrollment Ratio: 1. 9-12 Enrollment Ratio:...... Printed 9/5/213 ASPI Score 88.15

212 213 Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Printed on October 11, 213 : Glennallen Elementary : Copper River Title I : Yes Subgroup 1 Reading Writing Math Percent of FAY Students or Above 3 Reading Met? 4 Percent of FAY Students or Above 3 Writing Met? 4 Percent of FAY Students or Above 3 All Students 82.22 89.64 87.72 Y 77.8 78.9 84.21 Y 71.95 88.36 89.47 Y African American 76.53 7.85 58.93 Alaska Native & American Indian 62.69 79.19 83.33 Y 55.91 7.85 72.22 Y 53.53 83.32 88.89 Y Asian & Pacific Islander 79.1 76.44 71.49 Caucasian 91.29 95.51 9.91 N 86.53 82.13 87.88 Y 81.3 88.82 9.91 Y Hispanic 82.58 77.91 7.3 Two or more races 84.5 78.83 73.33 Economically Disadvantaged 71.77 76.8 85. Y 65.63 68.1 75. Y 6.58 8.11 8. Y Students w/disabilities (SWD) 2 53.16 69.48 47.57 38.86 42.25 54.17 Limited English (LEP) 2 48.67 45.9 43.63 Math Met? 4 Subgroup Participation Rate Attendance Rate Graduation Rate Rate () Met? 5 Rate Met? 6 4 Year Rate 5 Year Rate Met? 7 All Students 1 Y 91.81 N African American Alaska Native & American Indian 1 Y 9.22 N Asian & Pacific Islander 1 Caucasian 1 Y 92.6 N Hispanic Two or more races 1 94.1 N Economically Disadvantaged 1 Y 9.67 N Students w/disabilities (SWD) 2 1 89.43 N Limited English (LEP) 2 NOTES: 1. If a subgroup has fewer than five students enrolled in tested grades, "" has been entered for the proficiency percentage and Met? fields. 2. Students with Disabilities (SWD) and Limited English (LEP) subgroups include assessment scores of former SWD and former LEP students that are being monitored for two years. 3. Proficiency percentage is based on "Full Academic Year" (FAY) students enrolled from October 1 through the first day of testing in spring 213. 4. The AMO target is met if either the state or the school target has been met. 5. The participation rate target is 95 percent if the number of enrolled students is greater than 4. If the number of enrolled students is 4 or less, all but two students must test. Subgroups with fewer than five students will reflect " in the Met? field. 6. The attendance rate target is 95 percent for the school as a whole and for each subgroup with at least five students enrolled. 7. The graduation rate target is 9 percent for the school as a whole and for each subgroup with at least five members if the school enrolls students in grade 12.