ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 Mundelein Cons HSD 2 Mundelein, ILLINOIS 2 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. Starting in 29, charter school information is included in district statistics. STUDENTS RACIAL/ETHNIC BACKGROUND AND OTHER INFORMATION 52. 5. 3.2 8.3 37.5 23..5. Native Hawaiian /Pacific Islander. American Indian.3 Two or More Races 2.2 2.8 Percent Low- Income 3.3 8. Percent Limited- English- Proficient 3. 8.8 Percent IEP 6.. High Sch. Dropout Rate.6 2.7 Chronic Truancy Rate.8 3.2 Mobility Rate 8. 2.8 Attendance Rate 9.9 9. Total Enrollment 2,279 2,7,86 Low-income students come from families receiving public aid; live in institutions for neglected or delinquent children; are supported in foster homes with public funds; or are eligible to receive free or reduced-price lunches. IEP students are those students eligible to receive special education services. INSTRUCTIONAL SETTING Limited-English-proficient students are those students eligible for transitional bilingual programs. Mobility rate is based on the number of times students enroll in or leave a school during the school year. Chronic truants are students who are absent from school without valid cause for 8 or more of the last 8 school days. Total Enrollment is based on Home School. PARENTAL CONTACT* Percent STUDENT-TO-STAFF RATIOS Pupil- Teacher Elementary Pupil- Teacher Secondary Pupil- Certified Staff Pupil- Administrator 96. 22.6 8.9 5.2 3.6 6 2.3 * Parental contact includes parent-teacher conferences, parental visits to school, school visits to home, telephone conversations, and written correspondence. AVERAGE CLASS SIZE (as of the first school day in May) Grades K 5 6 7 8 9-2 2.8 9.2 TEACHER INFORMATION (Full-Time Equivalents) Native Hawaiian/ Pacific islander American Indian Two or More Races Unknown Male Female Total Number 93. 2.6.9 3. 7. 52.6 7 82. 6. 5..2...3 23. 76.9 28,262

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 2 TEACHER INFORMATION ( Continued ) : : All Schools High Poverty Schools Low Poverty Schools All Schools High Poverty Schools Low Poverty Schools Average Teaching Experience (Years) 3.3 3.2 3. 2.9 SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCES % of Teachers with Bachelor's Degrees 26. 39.5. 3.5 % of Teachers with Master's & Above 7. 6. 58.5 68. % of Teachers with Emergency or Provisional Credentials.9.6..2 % of Classes t Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers.8 3.3 The Child Left Behind Act requires that information for certain data elements be disaggregated by high- and low-poverty schools. Poverty (low-income) is defined on page of all report cards. High- and low-poverty schools include those in the top and bottom quarters of the poverty distribution of schools in the state. Disaggregated data are reported only if at least one school in your district falls within the high-poverty quarter and at least one school within the low-poverty quarter. TEACHER/ADMINISTRATOR SALARIES (Full-Time Equivalents) $2, $6, $2, $2,8 $9,759 Salaries and counts of staff are summed across a district based on the percentage of time that each individual is employed as a teacher or an administrator and may or may not reflect the actual paid salaries for the district. $8, $82,59 $6,978 $, $ Average Teacher Salary Average Administrator Salary EXPENDITURE BY FUNCTION 29- (Percentages) 7 6 5 3 2 5.7 7.5 29.8 3.5 2.8 7.7 3.7 3.2 Instruction General Administration Supporting Services Other Expenditures

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 3 REVENUE BY SOURCE 29- % % EXPENDITURE BY FUND 29- % % Local Property Taxes Other Local Funding General Aid Other Funding Federal Funding TOTAL $26,8,76 $,675,255 $868,677 $3,286,79 $,25,2 $33,837,87 79.2 5. 2.6 9.7 3.6 58.9 6..9 7.5 2. Education Operations & Maintenance Transportation Debt Service Tort Municipal Retirement/ Social Security Fire Prevention & Safety Site & Construction/ Capital Improvement TOTAL $25,999,2 $,923,723 $,5,83 $,35,7 $35,38 $877,7 $ $ $3,873,585 8.6 6..7.5. 2.8 72.9 6. 3.8 7.2.2.9 6. OTHER FINANCIAL INDICATORS 28 Equalized Assessed Valuation per Pupil 28 Total School Tax Rate per $ $76,3.7 ** ** 29- Instructional Expenditure per Pupil $7,88 $6,773 29- Operating Expenditure per Pupil $2,92 $,537 ** Due to the way Illinois school districts are configured, state averages for equalized assessed valuation per pupil and total school tax rate per $ are not provided. Equalized assessed valuation includes all computed property values upon which a district's local tax rate is calculated. Total school tax rate is a district's total tax rate as it appears on local property tax bills. Instructional expenditure per pupil includes the direct costs of teaching pupils or the interaction between teachers and pupils. Operating expenditure per pupil includes the gross operating cost of a school district excluding summer school, adult education, bond principal retired, and capital expenditures. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE ACT ASSESSMENT: GRADUATING CLASS OF 2* 36. 32. 28. 2. 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.9 2 2.8 2 2.2 2 2 6. 2. 8.. Composite English The number and percent of students taking the ACT are no longer reported since virtually every eleventh grade student takes the ACT as part of the PSAE. * Includes graduating students' most recent ACT Assessment scores from an ACT national test date or PSAE testing. Excludes the scores of students who took the test with special accommodations. averages for ACT data are based on regular public schools and do not include private and special purpose schools. HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE Gender Race / Ethnicity All Male Female Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander American Indian LEP Migrant Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged 82. 79.6 85.7 9.3 58.3 7 96. 93.3 3. 73. 67. 83.8 8.9 86.7 89. 7. 76.8 92.3 95.7 77.7 8. 67.7 66.2 75. Two or More Races

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 29 NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS (NAEP) NAEP is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education and administered to students in grade, 8, and 2. Only grade and 8 results are required to be reported. Achievement levels reflect what students should know and be able to do. Based on recommendations from policymakers, educators, and members of the general public, the Governing Board for NAEP sets specific achievement levels for each subject area and grade. To provide a context for interpreting student performance, NAEP results are reported as percentages of students performing below the Basic level, at or above the Basic and Proficient levels, and at the Advanced level. Basic denotes partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at a given grade. Proficient represents solid academic performance. Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter. Advanced represents superior performance. The four achievement levels (below basic, basic, proficient, and advanced) are reported as level through level, respectively. Please note that only state results are reported. Grade Grade - All Levels 35.3 32. 23.7 8.6 2..9 3.9 6.7 Grade - Racial/Ethnic Background Levels 22. 3.2 3.8 2. 9.5 38.9 2. 9.5 59.8 28.8.. 5.8 3.3.3.6 52. 32. 3.5 2. 28. 5.7 8.8.5 9.2 27. 36.2 27. 3. 23.9 8. 25. American Indian Grade - Limited-English-Proficient Levels 7.3 22.3 6.6.8 7.2 2.2 9.8.8 Grade - Students with Disabilities Levels 67.2 8..6. 38.2 38.6 9.3 3.9 Grade - Economically Disadvantaged Levels 53. 3.7 3..8 3.2 7.9 6.8. Grade - NAEP Participation Rates Limited English Proficient 79.5 85.3 Students with Disabilities 8.6 88.2

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 5 Grade 8 Grade 8 - All Levels 23.5 3.8 3. 2.3 27. 39.5 25.9 7.2 Grade 8 - Racial/Ethnic Background Levels 3.9 3.8 39...6.6 33.6.2 6..6.2 58.6 32.6 8. 3.9 6.7 8..3.6 2. 5.9. 7.6 32.5 52. 7.8.8 29.6.6 9. American Indian Grade 8 - Limited-English-Proficient Levels 72. 23.5.5 68.3 2.3 7..3 Grade 8 - Students with Disabilities Levels 62.9 27.2 9.6.3 62.2 29.9 6.9. Grade 8 - Economically Disadvantaged Levels..6 5.7 6.9 38.6 2.8.7 Grade 8 - NAEP Participation Rates Limited English Proficient 76. 8. Students with Disabilities 78. 8.3

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 OVERALL STUDENT PERFORMANCE 6 These charts present the overall percentages of state test scores categorized as meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards for your district and the state. They represent your district's performance in reading, mathematics, and science. OVERALL PERFORMANCE - ALL STATE TESTS 8 76. 76.5 6 56. 57.9 29-2- 2 OVERALL PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) PERFORMANCE 8 6 55.8 56.8 53. 5 29-2- 2 OVERALL ILLINOIS ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT (IAA) PERFORMANCE 97.8 8 6 66.2 29-2- 2 IAA scores in the Progressing and Attaining performance levels count the same, respectively, as scores on other state assessments that meet or exceed Standards.

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 7 PSAE PERFORMANCE These charts provide information on attainment of the Illinois Learning Standards. They show the average scores and also the percents of student scores meeting or exceeding Standards in reading, mathematics, and science on PSAE. PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) - Average Scores 2 8 6 56 55 56 56 58 57 57 56 59 58 58 57 29-2- 2 PSAE scores range from 2 to 2. PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) - Percents Meeting or Exceeding Standards 8 6 5.3 5.8 5. 5. 58.9 59.2 52.7 5.3 5.3 56.3 52. 9.2 29-2- 2 Number of students in this with PSAE scores in 2: 59

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 8 IAA PERFORMANCE These charts provide information on attainment of the Illinois Learning Standards. They show the percents of student scores meeting or exceeding Standards for the grades and subjects tested on IAA. IAA Grade 93.3 8 7.8 68.2 73. 72. 77.2 7.9 6 2 29-2- PERFORMANCE ON STATE ASSESSMENTS Federal law requires that student achievement results for reading, mathematics, and science for schools providing Title I services be reported to the general public. The Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) is administered to students in grades 3 through 8. The Prairie Achievement Examination (PSAE) is administered to students in grade. The Illinois Alternate Assessment (IAA) is administered to students with disabilities whose Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) indicate that participation in the ISAT or PSAE would not be appropriate. Students with disabilities have an IEP ( Child Left Behind Act). An IEP is a written plan for a child with a disability who is eligible to receive special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. and are tested in grades 3 through 8, and. is tested in grades, 7, and. In order to protect students' identities, test data for groups of fewer than ten students are not reported. PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS NOT TESTED IN STATE TESTING PROGRAMS FOR READING Gender Racial/Ethnic Background All Male Female Native Hawaiian /Pacific Islander American Indian Two or More Races LEP Migrant Economically Students with Disadvantaged Disabilities *Enrollment 568 29 277 3 7 9 33 9 87 63.3 5.9...8 *Enrollment,75,993 55,552 525,225. 55,77. 97,979 2,338.3,33.9 976 3,35. 29,668 65,98 276. 5,7.9 522,525 * Enrollment as reported during the testing windows for grades 3-8 and. Number of LEP Students who have attended schools in the U.S. for less than 2 months and are not assessed on the 's reading/language arts test:

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 9 PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS NOT TESTED IN STATE TESTING PROGRAMS FOR MATHEMATICS Gender Racial/Ethnic Background All Male Female Native Hawaiian /Pacific Islander American Indian Two or More Races LEP Economically Students with Disadvantaged Migrant Disabilities *Enrollment 568 29.3 277 3 7 5.9 9. 33 9 87. 63.8 *Enrollment,77,7. 55,9 526,. 555,55. 98,36 2,999.3,62 98. 3,32 29,68. 67,235. 282. 5,2.9 523,732 * Enrollment as reported during the testing windows for grades 3-8 and. PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS NOT TESTED IN STATE TESTING PROGRAMS FOR SCIENCE Gender Racial/Ethnic Background All Male Female Native Hawaiian /Pacific Islander American Indian Two or More Races LEP Economically Students with Disadvantaged Migrant Disabilities *Enrollment 568 29.3 277 3 7 5.9 9. 33 9 87. 63.8 *Enrollment 6,53.8 23,56.9 225,88 2,336.6 8,536.3,76 9,8.5,39.8 2,8 23,78 23 63,69. 2,96.9 * Enrollment as reported during the testing windows for grades, 7, and. PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) The following tables show the percentages of student scores in each of four performance levels. These levels were established with the help of Illinois educators who teach the grade levels and learning areas tested. Due to rounding, the sum of the percentages in the four performance levels may not always equal. Level -- Academic Warning - Level 2 -- Below Standards - Level 3 -- Meets Standards - Level -- Exceeds Standards - Student work demonstrates limited knowledge and skills in the subject. Because of major gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills ineffectively. Student work demonstrates basic knowledge and skills in the subject. However, because of gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills in limited ways. Student work demonstrates proficient knowledge and skills in the subject. Students effectively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems. Student work demonstrates advanced knowledge and skills in the subject. Students creatively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems and evaluate the results. Grade Grade - All Levels.5. 33.7 38.9 7. 7.8. 8. 32.8 38.7 53.6 3. 5.6 8.2 7.8 8.6 35.9 2.2 7.5 39.6 8.7 9.6

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 Grade - Gender Male Levels.6 2.7 3. 7.5 39.3 38.2 6.8 9.8.6 27.5 55. 35.9 3.3 7..2 9.6 9. 3 8.2 38.6. 2. 2.3 Female 8.2 7.5 36. 38.5 6.5 3.2 8.9.9 5.9 9. 38.3.5 5.7 2.9. 6.2 5.9 8. 2. 5.8 6.8 39.2 5.2 6.9 Grade - Racial/Ethnic Background Levels Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander American Indian Two or More Races 7.5 23. 58.3..9 2 66. 8.5.9 23.8 58.3 3. 6. 29.6 9..9 5.3 29.8 53.5...3 5.. 2.9 5 7. 2. 6.3.3 28.6 57..3 8.5 56.7 23.2.6 23. 56.8 9.6.6 9.9 63.2 6.2 7.3 5.8 29.7 2.2 2. 5.6 32. 2. 57.8 28.6..7 52. 3. 3.2 5.9 33..9.9 58. 27.7 2.2 3. 27.3 57.6 2. 3. 9. 75.8 2. 2.2 66.7 2. 6.7 27.3 6.3 9.7 3.2 9. 52. 25.7 3.9 25.7 9.3 2.2 2.5 2. 36.7 8..9 2.5.3 5.3 8.6 8. 38. 5.3 7.6 35.9 3.6 2.9 8. 3.8.6 6.6 5.8. 6.7 7.3 2.9 9.6 38.7 8.8 8.5 38.6. 8.7 6.5.2.8.5 Grade - Limited-English-Proficient Levels 55.5 6. 3.3.3 35.8 7 5.3 2.8.2 35.9 5 57.7 6.2.2 Grade - Students with Disabilities Levels IEP 53.5 28.2 8.3 6.5 37.9 3. 2.2 36.6 6. 53.5 9.9.8.2.9 36.6 39.6 7.9. 6.9.5. 2. n-iep 5.2 5.2 3.5 39. 5.3.3 9.. 3.8 5.2 29.7 38.3 6 7. 6.5 9. 3.6.5 3..6 52.5 3. 9.8.6 Grade - Economically Disadvantaged Levels Free/Reduced Price Lunch 9.5 2 5 3 27.3 3.2 2.3 2 53.2 3 33..3 3. 2 6. 3 25.3.3 t Eligible 7. 53. 27.3 2.6 7.8 53. 27.3.5 5.6 59. 23.6.8 8. 27.3 5.7 9.6 6.3 2.8 6.5 7.3 5.8 26.3 56.2.6 5.5 29.7 9. 5. 5. 29. 53. 2.5. 3.3 5.6

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 ILLINOIS ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT (IAA) The Illinois Alternate Assessment (IAA) is administered to students with disabilities whose Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) indicate that participation in the ISAT or PSAE would not be appropriate. The table below presents the percentages of student scores in each of four performance levels. Level -- Entry - Students do not demonstrate knowledge and skills in the subject through links to the Illinois Learning Standards. Level 2 --Foundational- Students demonstrate emerging knowledge and skills in the subject as linked to the Illinois Learning Standards. Students exhibit an ability to reproduce knowledge and skills. Level 3 -- Satisfactory - Students demonstrate basic knowledge and skills in the subject through links to the Illinois Learning Standards. Students exhibit an ability to associate their knowledge and skills. Level -- Mastery - Students demonstrate knowledge and skills in the subject through links to the Illinois Learning Standards. Students exhibit the ability to apply their knowledge and skills. Grade Grade - All Levels 6.7 26.7 66.7 26.7 73.3 3.3 86.7 2.6 9.2 39. 28.8.2 3.7 9.8 22.3 2.8 2.3 25. 9.6 Grade - Gender Male Female Levels 2 8 2 8 9 2.3 7.6 3 5.2 2.7 7.7 2. 3.3 2.5 22.7 5. 2.7 7.3 2. 27.8 2.8.6 52.9 9.8.9.5 29. 7.6 Grade - Racial/Ethnic Background Levels Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander American Indian Two or More Races.6 8.7 38.6 3. 3. 3.8 5 22.3..2 23.6 52.. 8.9 2.5 27.6 5.2 2.7 5.8 2..3.8 26.8 9. 6. 9.5 38.2 26.3 3.9 3. 8.7 2.3.5.9 26.7 6.9 22.2 7.8 3. 28.9 2.. 2. 22.7 9. 3.8 36. 8.3 6.7 58.3 6.7 8.3 8.3 5 33.3 8.3 25. 66.7 6.7 2 3 33.3 3.3 26.7 36.7 23.3 6.7 2 3 26.7 6.7

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 2 2 ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) INFORMATION Is this district making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? Has this district been identified for Improvement according to the AYP specifications of the federal Child Left Behind Act? Yes Is this district making AYP in? 2-2 Federal Improvement Status Corrective Action Year 3 Is this district making AYP in? 2-2 Improvement Status Academic Watch Status Year 5 Percent Tested on Tests Percent Meeting/Exceeding Standards * Other Indicators Attendance Rate Graduation Rate % Met AYP % Met AYP % Safe Harbor Target ** Met AYP % Safe Harbor Target ** Met AYP % Met AYP % Met AYP AYP Minimum Target 95. 95. 85. 85. 9. 82. All 99.5 Yes 99.5 Yes 56.9 6. 82. Yes Yes Yes 7.8 69. Yes 76. 7.2 Yes 9.3 99. Yes 99. Yes 3.2 37. 35.3. 7 Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander American Indian Two or More Races LEP Students with Disabilities 98.9 Yes 98.9 Yes 32. 23. 25.9 2. 73. Economically Disadvantaged 98.2 Yes 98.2 Yes 33.3 3.9 36.7.8 67. Four Conditions Are Required For Making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP):. At least 95% tested in reading and mathematics for every student group. If the current year participation rate is less than 95%, this condition may be met if the average of the current and preceding year rates is at least 95%, or if the average of the current and two preceding years is at least 95%. Only actual participation rates are printed. If the participation rate printed is less than 95% and yet this school makes AYP, it means that the 95% condition was met by averaging. 2. At least 85% meeting/exceeding standards in reading and mathematics for every group. For any group with less than 85% meeting/exceeding standards, a 95% confidence interval was applied. Subgroups may meet this condition through Safe Harbor provisions.*** 3. At least 9% attendance rate for non-high schools and at least 82% graduation rate for high schools. * Includes only students enrolled as of 5//2. ** Safe Harbor Targets of 85% or above are not printed. ***Subgroups with fewer than 5 students are not reported. Safe Harbor only applies to subgroups of 5 or more. In order for Safe Harbor to apply, a subgroup must decrease by % the percentage of scores that did not meet standards from the previous year plus meet the other indicators (attendance rate for non-high schools and graduation rate for high schools) for the subgroup. For subgroups that do not meet their Safe Harbor Targets, a 75% confidence interval is applied. Safe Harbor allows schools an alternate method to meet subgroup minimum targets on achievement.

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 3

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 FEDERAL SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT STATUS Below is a list of the Title I funded schools in the district that are in Federal School Improvement Status as defined by the federal Child Left Behind Act of 2. Number of schools in this district: Number of Title I schools: Number of Title I schools in Federal School Improvement Status: Percent of schools in Federal School Improvement Status: % Years in School School ID School Name Improvement 3923 Mundelein Cons High School 5

3-9-2-3- Mundelein Cons HSD 2 5 2 DIFFERENTIATED ACCOUNTABILITY CLASSIFICATION The Differentiated Accountability Classification for the district is: Comprehensive Is this district making AYP in the "ALL" subgroup in reading? Is this district making AYP in the "ALL" subgroup in math? In 28, the Illinois Board of Education was one of 6 states to be chosen by the US Department of Education to participate on the Differentiated Accountability Pilot Program. The Differentiated Accountability classification applies only to districts in federal improvement status that do not make AYP. The classification is a descriptor (i.e., focused or comprehensive) that is added to a district s improvement status. Current Title I requirements do not change. The classification assists in distinguishing between districts that need focused supports verses more comprehensive interventions. If a district does make AYP in ALL-student group in both reading and math, this district will be classified as a focused district; otherwise, the district will be identified as a comprehensive district.