ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Similar documents
ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Shelters Elementary School

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Financing Education In Minnesota

State of New Jersey

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

AYP: Adequate Yearly Progress

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

African American Male Achievement Update

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

El Toro Elementary School

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Cuero Independent School District

Transportation Equity Analysis

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Best Colleges Main Survey

Rural Education in Oregon

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

State Parental Involvement Plan

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

HIGH SCHOOL PREP PROGRAM APPLICATION For students currently in 7th grade

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

University of Arizona

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Grant/Scholarship General Criteria CRITERIA TO APPLY FOR AN AESF GRANT/SCHOLARSHIP

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

46 Children s Defense Fund

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Hokulani Elementary School

PUBLIC SCHOOL OPEN ENROLLMENT POLICY FOR INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL DISTRICT

Mooresville Charter Academy

Scholarship Reporting

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS

Trends & Issues Report

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Bellehaven Elementary

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Educational Attainment

Transcription:

East Alton-Wood River CHSD Wood River, ILLINOIS ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. Starting in 9, charter school information is included in district statistics. STUDENTS RACIAL/ETHNIC BACKGROUND AND OTHER INFORMATION 9.8 5.8 3. 8.8.. Asian/ Pacific Islander.6. Native American.. Multi racial /Ethnic.8.9 Percent Low- Income 5.9 5. Percent Limited- English- Proficient. 7.6 Percent IEP 9. 3. High Sch. Dropout Rate 6. 3.8 Chronic Truancy Rate 5.6 3.6 Mobility Rate 5. 3. Attendance Rate 9.8 93.9 Total Enrollment 6,6,3 Low-income students come from families receiving public aid; live in institutions for neglected or delinquent children; are supported in foster homes with public funds; or are eligible to receive free or reduced-price lunches. IEP students are those students eligible to receive special education services. Limited-English-proficient students are those students eligible for transitional bilingual programs. Mobility rate is based on the number of times students enroll in or leave a school during the school year. Chronic truants are students who are absent from school without valid cause for 8 or more of the last 8 school days. INSTRUCTIONAL SETTING PARENTAL CONTACT* Percent STUDENT-TO-STAFF RATIOS Pupil- Teacher Elementary Pupil- Teacher Secondary Pupil- Certified Staff Pupil- Administrator. 96. 9.5 8..5 3.3 8.6 3.8 * Parental contact includes parent-teacher conferences, parental visits to school, school visits to home, telephone conversations, and written correspondence. AVERAGE CLASS SIZE (as of the first school day in May) Grades K 3 5 6 7 8 9-7.9 9.7 TEACHER INFORMATION (Full-Time Equivalents) Asian/ Pacific Islander Native American Male Female Total Number..... 3.6 65. 85. 8. 5... 3. 77. 3,5

TEACHER INFORMATION ( Continued ) : All Schools High Poverty Schools Low Poverty Schools : All Schools High Poverty Schools Average Teaching Experience (Years) 9.6.7. % of Teachers with Bachelor's Degrees 59.3. 3.8 % of Teachers with Master's & Above 38.3 57. 55.7 % of Teachers with Emergency or Provisional Credentials..5. % of Classes t Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers..7. The Child Left Behind Act requires that information for certain data elements be disaggregated by high- and low-poverty schools. Poverty (low-income) is defined on page of all report cards. High- and low-poverty schools include those in the top and bottom quarters of the poverty distribution of schools in the state. Disaggregated data are reported only if at least one school in your district falls within the high-poverty quarter and at least one school within the low-poverty quarter. Low Poverty Schools. 3.6 65... SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCES TEACHER/ADMINISTRATOR SALARIES (Full-Time Equivalents) $, $6, Salaries and counts of staff are summed across a district based on the percentage of time that each individual is employed as a teacher or an administrator and may or may not reflect the actual paid salaries for the district. $, $,7 $9,9 $8, $, $ $57,98 $63,96 Average Teacher Salary Average Administrator Salary EXPENDITURE BY FUNCTION 8-9 (Percentages) 7. 6. 5. 7. 6.. 3.. 8.3 3. 7.7 8.5.. 6.7 3. Instruction General Administration Supporting Services Other Expenditures

3 REVENUE BY SOURCE 8-9 % % EXPENDITURE BY FUND 8-9 % % Local Property Taxes Other Local Funding General Aid Other Funding Federal Funding TOTAL $,59,37 $93,397 $,37,5 $9,79 $,3,38 $8,3,56 53.5. 5.7 5..6 58. 6.9.5 8.3.9 Education Operations & Maintenance Transportation Debt Service Tort Municipal Retirement/ Social Security Fire Prevention & Safety Site & Construction/ Capital Improvement TOTAL $5,569,7 $37,9 $6,66 $,98, $378,737 $,635 $,39 $ $7,87,58 7..7.6..8... 69.6 7.9 3.8 7...8.8 7.9 OTHER FINANCIAL INDICATORS 7 Equalized Assessed Valuation per Pupil 7 Total School Tax Rate per $ $5,739.8 ** ** 8-9 Instructional Expenditure per Pupil $6,55 $6,83 8-9 Operating Expenditure per Pupil $,97 $,97 ** Due to the way Illinois school districts are configured, state averages for equalized assessed valuation per pupil and total school tax rate per $ are not provided. Equalized assessed valuation includes all computed property values upon which a district's local tax rate is calculated. Total school tax rate is a district's total tax rate as it appears on local property tax bills. Instructional expenditure per pupil includes the direct costs of teaching pupils or the interaction between teachers and pupils. Operating expenditure per pupil includes the gross operating cost of a school district excluding summer school, adult education, bond principal retired, and capital expenditures. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE ACT ASSESSMENT: GRADUATING CLASS OF * 36. 3. 8... 8..5 9.9 6.9 7.6.5 8.7.6 8..3 6.. 8... Composite English The number and percent of students taking the ACT are no longer reported since virtually every eleventh grade student takes the ACT as part of the PSAE. * Includes graduating students' most recent ACT Assessment scores from an ACT national test date or PSAE testing. Excludes the scores of students who took the test with special accommodations. averages for ACT data are based on regular public schools and do not include private and special purpose schools. HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE Gender All Male Female Race / Ethnicity Asian/ Pacific Islander Native American Multi racial /Ethnic LEP Migrant Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged 8.9 73.3 87.8 8.6 5. 5. 66.7 8.3 87.8 87.3 88. 93.3 78. 79. 78. 79.3

9 NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS (NAEP) NAEP is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education and administered to students in grade, 8, and. Only grade and 8 results are required to be reported. Achievement levels reflect what students should know and be able to do. Based on recommendations from policymakers, educators, and members of the general public, the Governing Board for NAEP sets specific achievement levels for each subject area and grade. To provide a context for interpreting student performance, NAEP results are reported as percentages of students performing below the Basic level, at or above the Basic and Proficient levels, and at the Advanced level. Basic denotes partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at a given grade. Proficient represents solid academic performance. Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter. Advanced represents superior performance. The four achievement levels (below basic, basic, proficient, and advanced) are reported as level through level, respectively. Please note that only state results are reported. Grade Grade - All Levels 3 3 35.3 3. 3.7 8.6..9 3.9 6.7 Grade - Racial/Ethnic Background Levels 3 3. 3. 3.8. 9.5 38.9. 9.5 59.8 8.8.. 5.8 3.3.3.6 5. 3. 3.5. 8. 5.7 8.8.5 Asian/Pacific Islander 9. 7. 36. 7. 3. 3.9 8. 5. Native American Grade - Limited-English-Proficient Levels 3 7.3.3 6.6.8 7. 3. 9.8.8 Grade - Students with Disabilities Levels 3 67. 8..6. 38. 3 38.6 9.3 3.9 Grade - Economically Disadvantaged Levels 3 53. 3.7 3..8 3. 3 7.9 6.8. Grade - NAEP Participation Rates Limited English Proficient 79.5 85.3 Students with Disabilities 8.6 88.

5 Grade 8 Grade 8 - All Levels 3 3 3.5 3.8 3..3 7. 39.5 5.9 7. Grade 8 - Racial/Ethnic Background Levels 3 3 3.9 3.8 39. 3..6.6 33.6. 6. 3.6.. 58.6 3.6 8..7 3.9 6.7 8..3.6. 5.9. Asian/Pacific Islander 7.6 3.5 5. 7.8.8 9.6.6 9. Native American Grade 8 - Limited-English-Proficient Levels 3 3 7. 3.5.5. 68.3.3 7..3 Grade 8 - Students with Disabilities Levels 3 3 6.9 7. 9.6.3 6. 9.9 6.9. Grade 8 - Economically Disadvantaged Levels 3 3. 3.6 5.7.5 6.9 38.6.8.7 Grade 8 - NAEP Participation Rates Limited English Proficient 76. 8. Students with Disabilities 78. 8.3

OVERALL STUDENT PERFORMANCE 6 These charts present the overall percentages of state test scores categorized as meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards for your district and the state. They represent your district's performance in reading, mathematics, and science. OVERALL PERFORMANCE - ALL STATE TESTS 8 75.5 76. 6..5 8-9 9- OVERALL PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) PERFORMANCE 8 6.6 39. 53. 53. 8-9 9-

7 PSAE PERFORMANCE These charts provide information on attainment of the Illinois Learning Standards. They show the average scores and also the percents of student scores meeting or exceeding Standards in reading, mathematics, and science on PSAE. PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) - Average Scores 8 6 5 5 57 56 5 9 57 57 53 5 57 58 8-9 9- PSAE scores range from to. PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) - Percents Meeting or Exceeding Standards 8 6 9..6 56.9 5. 37. 3. 5.6 5.7 35.5.3 5.5 5. 8-9 9- Number of students in this with PSAE scores in :

8 PERFORMANCE ON STATE ASSESSMENTS Federal law requires that student achievement results for reading, mathematics, and science for schools providing Title I services be reported to the general public. The Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) is administered to students in grades 3 through 8. The Prairie Achievement Examination (PSAE) is administered to students in grade. The Illinois Alternate Assessment (IAA) is administered to students with disabilities whose Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) indicate that participation in the ISAT or PSAE would not be appropriate. Students with disabilities have an IEP ( Child Left Behind Act). An IEP is a written plan for a child with a disability who is eligible to receive special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. and are tested in grades 3 through 8, and. is tested in grades, 7, and. In order to protect students' identities, test data for groups of fewer than ten students are not reported. PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS NOT TESTED IN STATE TESTING PROGRAMS FOR READING AND MATHEMATICS All Male Gender Female Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/ Pacific Islander Native American Multi racial /Ethnic LEP Migrant Economically Students with Disadvantaged Disabilities *Enrollment 6 57 69 9 63.8.8.8.8...8.8 3. 3..6.6 *Enrollment,68,.. 55,78.3.3 5,5.. 565,375 99,7 9,899,975..5.....5...,39 36,3 67,9...3.3 36.9.9 5,7.5.5 53,.3.3 * Enrollment as reported during the testing windows for grades 3-8 and. PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS NOT TESTED IN STATE TESTING PROGRAMS FOR SCIENCE ONLY All Gender Male Female Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/ Pacific Islander Native American Multi racial /Ethnic LEP Migrant Economically Students with Disadvantaged Disabilities *Enrollment 6.8 57.8 69..8 9 3. 63.6 *Enrollment 9,9. 8,53.5,563.3,35. 8,93. 88,35.5 9,39.3 898.,65.3 3,83.5 5.9 6,75.9,59.6 * Enrollment as reported during the testing windows for grades, 7, and.

9 PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION (PSAE) The following tables show the percentages of student scores in each of four performance levels. These levels were established with the help of Illinois educators who teach the grade levels and learning areas tested. Due to rounding, the sum of the percentages in the four performance levels may not always equal. Level -- Academic Warning - Level -- Below Standards - Level 3 -- Meets Standards - Level -- Exceeds Standards - Student work demonstrates limited knowledge and skills in the subject. Because of major gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills ineffectively. Student work demonstrates basic knowledge and skills in the subject. However, because of gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills in limited ways. Student work demonstrates proficient knowledge and skills in the subject. Students effectively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems. Student work demonstrates advanced knowledge and skills in the subject. Students creatively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems and evaluate the results. Grade Grade - All Levels 3 3 3. 9..3 37. 3...7 9.9.5.6 6.3 36.7 8.9. 3.3.3 9.9 9.7 8.8 37.9.3.6..8 Grade - Gender Male Levels..3 3. 35. 37.3.9. 9.5..9 3 5. 5.9 3.. 3.7.5.. 3 57. 3.5 3.6.5. 3.7 Female 9. 6.8 38.8 36.7 9.3 6. 3.... 3.3 39. 3.3. 3. 8. 9. 9.3.8. 9.3.7. 7.9 Grade - Racial/Ethnic Background Levels 3 Asian/Pacific Islander Native American Multiracial/Ethnic.7.5 3..7.6 5.7 9.3 3. 9.5 8.3.. 5.3 9. 5. 3.5 5.7 9.6 5. 3.8.8 9. 5.9.9 7. 55. 6..6 6. 53.5 9.5.9 3. 57. 8.8.9 5.6 5. 3.7.5 5.5 5.7 3.. 6. 5. 7.5. 6. 8. 8.7 7. 3.6 9. 5. 7..5.5 9.8.3 8.3 37. 3.9.9.6 37.3.6 9.6. 37.6.9 9. 7. 35. 6.. 3 3 9.3 38. 3.6 9. 8. 37...5

Grade - Students with Disabilities Levels 3 IEP 5. 5.8...7.8.. 75. 5.8 3 5...9... 37.5. 3 6.5. 3.9.9.. n-iep. 5.. 36.3 53.6 7.7..8 8. 6.3 5.5 36. 36. 6... 3. 5.7 5. 37. 5.5 5.3..8 Grade - Economically Disadvantaged Levels Free/Reduced Price Lunch 9.. 3 37.9.7. 6.6 3 9.3. 3.8 8.3 3 37.9. t Eligible 6. 5.7 9.5.. 5.9 7.. 8.9 5. 5.. 9.5.3 7.6.6 9. 6. 8.6 6.3 6.3 9... 5. 9. 5.. 5.5 8.9 5.9.8.7 9. 5.6 5.5

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) INFORMATION Is this district making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? Has this district been identified for Improvement according to the AYP specifications of the federal Child Left Behind Act? Yes Is this district making AYP in? - Federal Improvement Status Corrective Action Year Is this district making AYP in? - Improvement Status Academic Watch Status Year Percent Tested on Tests Percent Meeting/Exceeding Standards * Other Indicators Attendance Rate Graduation Rate % Met AYP % Met AYP % Safe Harbor Target ** Met AYP % Safe Harbor Target ** Met AYP % Met AYP % Met AYP AYP Minimum Target 95. 95. 77.5 77.5 9. 8. All 99. Yes 99. Yes 7.3 35.7 8.9 Yes 99. Yes 99. Yes 8. 5. 36. 3. 8.6 Asian/Pacific Islander Native American Multiracial /Ethnic LEP Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged 98. Yes 98. Yes.6 5. Yes 35.7 3. Yes 8.3 Four Conditions Are Required For Making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP):. At least 95% tested in reading and mathematics for every student group. If the current year participation rate is less than 95%, this condition may be met if the average of the current and preceding year rates is at least 95%, or if the average of the current and two preceding years is at least 95%. Only actual participation rates are printed. If the participation rate printed is less than 95% and yet this school makes AYP, it means that the 95% condition was met by averaging.. At least 77.5% meeting/exceeding standards in reading and mathematics for every group. For any group with less than 77.5% meeting/exceeding standards, a 95% confidence interval was applied. Subgroups may meet this condition through Safe Harbor provisions.*** 3. At least 9% attendance rate for non-high schools and at least 8% graduation rate for high schools. * Includes only students enrolled as of 5//9. ** Safe Harbor Targets of 77.5% or above are not printed. ***Subgroups with fewer than 5 students are not reported. Safe Harbor only applies to subgroups of 5 or more. In order for Safe Harbor to apply, a subgroup must decrease by % the percentage of scores that did not meet standards from the previous year plus meet the other indicators (attendance rate for non-high schools and graduation rate for high schools) for the subgroup. For subgroups that do not meet their Safe Harbor Targets, a 75% confidence interval is applied. Safe Harbor allows schools an alternate method to meet subgroup minimum targets on achievement.

FEDERAL SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT STATUS Below is a list of the Title I funded schools in the district that are in Federal School Improvement Status as defined by the federal Child Left Behind Act of. Number of schools in this district: Number of Title I schools: Number of Title I schools in Federal School Improvement Status: Percent of schools in Federal School Improvement Status:.% Years in School School ID School Name Improvement 576 East Alton-Wood River High Sch 8

3 DIFFERENTIATED ACCOUNTABILITY CLASSIFICATION The Differentiated Accountability Classification for the district is: Comprehensive Is this district making AYP in the "ALL" subgroup in reading? Is this district making AYP in the "ALL" subgroup in math? In 8, the Illinois Board of Education was one of 6 states to be chosen by the US Department of Education to participate on the Differentiated Accountability Pilot Program. The Differentiated Accountability classification applies only to districts in federal improvement status that do not make AYP. The classification is a descriptor (i.e., focused or comprehensive) that is added to a district s improvement status. Current Title I requirements do not change. The classification assists in distinguishing between districts that need focused supports verses more comprehensive interventions. If a district does make AYP in ALL-student group in both reading and math, this district will be classified as a focused district; otherwise, the district will be identified as a comprehensive district.