Stonegate Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Engage Educate Empower

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Shelters Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Val Verde Unified School District

Hokulani Elementary School

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Cuero Independent School District

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

State Parental Involvement Plan

Cooper Upper Elementary School

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Kahului Elementary School

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Val Verde Unified School District

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

African American Male Achievement Update

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Transportation Equity Analysis

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Educational Attainment

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

CDS Code

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Conroe Independent School District

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Organization Profile

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

World s Best Workforce Plan

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

3/6/2009. Residence Halls & Strategic t Planning Overview. Residence Halls Overview. Residence Halls: Marapai Supai Kachina

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

SCHOOL. Wake Forest '93. Count

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Best Colleges Main Survey

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

Geographic Area - Englewood

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Student Transportation

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

Updated: December Educational Attainment

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

Transcription:

Stonegate Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2014-15 School Year Published During 2015-16 By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC). The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners. Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. About This School Contact Information (Most Recent Year) School Contact Information School Name------- Street------- Stonegate Elementary School 100 Honors City, State, Zip------- Irvine, CA 92620 Phone Number------- (949) 936-6450 Principal------- E-mail Address------- s Served K-6 Harmony Hager harmonyhager@iusd.org CDS Code 30-73650-6096192 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Stonegate Elementary School Page 1 of 13

District Contact Information District Name------- Irvine Unified School District Phone Number------- (949) 936-5000 Superintendent------- Mr. Terry Walker E-mail Address------- TerryWalker@iusd.org Web Site------- www.iusd.org School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year) Stonegate Elementary School is a family-friendly school, where children and learning are our first priorities. We have a strong sense of purpose and provide a stable, secure environment where parents and families feel at home and know their children will receive the best possible education. We are committed to educating the whole child through a strong academic focus, curriculum consistency among grade levels, high behavior standards, and consistent discipline. In addition, we help prepare students ethically, socially, and technologically for success in our global society. We are an eco-friendly Green school and utilize the latest technology to enhance learning throughout the school. Each classroom is equipped with a variety of interactive technologies to enhance instruction and the student learning experience. In our media center, computer lab areas and library students enjoy access to advance technology tools as well. In 2013, Stonegate was awarded The National Blue Ribbon from the U.S. Department of Education and in 2013 and 2009, Stonegate received the California Distinguished School Award from the California State Department of Education. We are very proud of these accomplishments as it represents our dedication to the children and families in our community. Moving forward, we continue to focus on the needs and development of students and supporting our many new families and our growing community. We are all very proud to be called Stonegate Hawks. Student Enrollment by Level (School Year 2014-15) Number of Level Students Kindergarten 123 1 150 2 180 3 179 4 164 5 162 6 164 Total Enrollment 1,122 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Stonegate Elementary School Page 2 of 13

Student Enrollment by Group (School Year 2014-15) Student Percent of Group Total Enrollment Black or African American 0.8 Asian 65.4 Filipino 3.9 Hispanic or Latino 5.3 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.2 White 17.7 Two or More Races 6.7 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 7.3 English Learners 23 Students with Disabilities 5.3 Foster Youth 0.1 A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair. Teacher Credentials Teachers School District 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2015-16 With Full Credential 37.6 39 37 1352.99 Without Full Credential 0 0 0 0 Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0 0 0 108.806 Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Indicator 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 0 0 0 Total Teacher Misassignments * 0 0 0 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 0 Note: Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2014-15) Location of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers This School 100.0 0.0 All Schools in District 100.0 0.0 High-Poverty Schools in District 100.0 0.0 Low-Poverty Schools in District 100.0 0.0 Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Stonegate Elementary School Page 3 of 13

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2015-16) Year and month in which data were collected: September 2015 Core Curriculum Area Reading/Language Arts Mathematics Science History-Social Science Health Visual and Performing Arts Textbooks and Instructional Materials/ Year of Adoption All students are provided an individual textbook or instructional material as determined by textbook software in September, 2015. All textbooks purchased are state-adopted, and are standards aligned. All students are provided an individual textbook or instructional material as determined by textbook software in September, 2015. All textbooks purchased are state-adopted, and are standards aligned. All students are provided an individual textbook or instructional material as determined by textbook software in September, 2015. All textbooks purchased are state-adopted, and are standards aligned. All students are provided an individual textbook or instructional material as determined by a survey conducted in September 2015. All textbooks purchased are state-adopted, and are standards aligned. All students are provided an individual textbook or instructional material as determined by textbook software in September, 2015. All textbooks purchased are state-adopted, and are standards aligned. All students are provided an individual textbook and/or instructional material. From Most Recent Adoption? Percent of Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy Yes 0% Yes 0% Yes 0% Yes 0% Yes 0% Yes 0% 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Stonegate Elementary School Page 4 of 13

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year) Stonegate is a brand new school facility where construction was completed in August 2009. This 2009-10 school year is our first. There are no immediate plans for physical additions to the school and there is no need at this time for any repairs beyond the scope general maintenance. School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: July 2015 Repair Status Good Fair Poor Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences Overall Facility Rating (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: July 2015 Exemplary Good Fair Poor Overall Rating B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP], Science California s Tests); and The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results for All Students (School Year 2014-15) Subject Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State s (grades 3-8 and 11) School District State English Language Arts/Literacy 87 77 44 Mathematics 88 74 33 Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Stonegate Elementary School Page 5 of 13

CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA) Disaggregated by Student Groups, s Three through Eight and Eleven (School Year 2014-15) Student Group Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Not Met Percent of Students Nearly Met Met Exceeded All Students 3 181 178 98.3 3 15 27 56 4 167 162 97.0 4 10 21 65 5 165 157 95.2 3 8 34 56 6 165 162 98.2 3 7 35 55 Male 3 88 48.6 3 19 28 49 4 98 58.7 5 12 24 58 5 77 46.7 4 5 36 55 6 94 57.0 4 6 44 46 Female 3 90 49.7 2 10 26 62 4 64 38.3 3 6 16 75 5 80 48.5 1 10 31 58 6 68 41.2 1 7 24 68 Black or African American 4 1 0.6 -- -- -- -- 5 1 0.6 -- -- -- -- 6 2 1.2 -- -- -- -- Asian 3 123 68.0 3 13 24 60 4 100 59.9 2 8 16 74 5 103 62.4 2 5 32 61 6 107 64.8 2 5 35 59 Filipino 3 9 5.0 -- -- -- -- 4 5 3.0 -- -- -- -- 5 5 3.0 -- -- -- -- 6 11 6.7 9 0 36 55 Hispanic or Latino 3 8 4.4 -- -- -- -- 4 11 6.6 18 9 36 36 5 9 5.5 -- -- -- -- 6 7 4.2 -- -- -- -- White 3 26 14.4 0 23 35 42 4 35 21.0 9 17 26 49 5 30 18.2 0 13 43 43 6 27 16.4 0 7 52 41 Two or More Races 3 12 6.6 0 17 42 42 4 10 6.0 -- -- -- -- 5 9 5.5 -- -- -- -- 6 8 4.8 -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 3 7 3.9 -- -- -- -- 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Stonegate Elementary School Page 6 of 13

Student Group Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Not Met Percent of Students Nearly Met Met Exceeded 4 15 9.0 20 20 27 33 5 13 7.9 0 15 31 54 6 14 8.5 0 7 50 43 English Learners 3 45 24.9 9 13 33 44 4 32 19.2 16 16 25 44 5 30 18.2 3 3 53 40 6 16 9.7 13 19 44 25 Students with Disabilities 3 13 7.2 8 31 23 38 4 16 9.6 19 6 19 56 5 7 4.2 -- -- -- -- 6 11 6.7 27 36 18 18 Foster Youth 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- 6 -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics Disaggregated by Student Groups, s Three through Eight and Eleven (School Year 2014-15) Student Group Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Not Met Percent of Students Nearly Met Met Exceeded All Students 3 181 177 97.8 2 8 38 52 4 167 165 98.8 2 8 31 59 5 165 159 96.4 3 14 25 57 6 165 163 98.8 4 6 18 72 Male 3 88 48.6 2 8 36 53 4 99 59.3 1 5 34 60 5 78 47.3 1 8 26 65 6 95 57.6 4 7 17 72 Female 3 89 49.2 1 9 39 51 4 66 39.5 3 14 26 58 5 81 49.1 5 21 25 49 6 68 41.2 3 3 21 74 Black or African American 4 1 0.6 -- -- -- -- 5 1 0.6 -- -- -- -- 6 2 1.2 -- -- -- -- 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Stonegate Elementary School Page 7 of 13

Student Group Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Not Met Percent of Students Nearly Met Met Exceeded Asian 3 123 68.0 2 9 32 58 4 103 61.7 2 1 26 71 5 105 63.6 1 10 23 66 6 108 65.5 3 3 13 81 Filipino 3 8 4.4 -- -- -- -- 4 5 3.0 -- -- -- -- 5 5 3.0 -- -- -- -- 6 11 6.7 9 9 9 73 Hispanic or Latino 3 8 4.4 -- -- -- -- 4 11 6.6 9 27 36 27 5 9 5.5 -- -- -- -- 6 7 4.2 -- -- -- -- White 3 26 14.4 0 8 58 35 4 35 21.0 0 20 43 37 5 30 18.2 10 27 20 43 6 27 16.4 4 7 26 63 Two or More Races 3 12 6.6 8 8 33 50 4 10 6.0 -- -- -- -- 5 9 5.5 -- -- -- -- 6 8 4.8 -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 3 7 3.9 -- -- -- -- 4 16 9.6 6 25 44 25 5 13 7.9 8 23 38 31 6 14 8.5 0 7 29 64 English Learners 3 45 24.9 2 7 42 49 4 35 21.0 9 6 43 43 5 31 18.8 0 13 42 45 6 17 10.3 18 6 18 59 Students with Disabilities 3 13 7.2 0 23 38 38 4 16 9.6 6 13 31 50 5 7 4.2 -- -- -- -- 6 11 6.7 36 18 18 27 Foster Youth 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- 6 -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Stonegate Elementary School Page 8 of 13

Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. California s Tests for All Students in Science (Three-Year Comparison) Subject Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) School District State 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 95 96 93 87 88 88 59 60 56 Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. California s Tests Results by Student Group in Science (School Year 2014-15) Student Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced All Students in the LEA 88 All Students at the School 93 Male 96 Female 92 Black or African American -- Asian 98 Filipino Hispanic or Latino -- -- White 90 Two or More Races -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- English Learners 96 Students with Disabilities 84 Foster Youth -- Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2014-15) Level Percent of Students Meeting Fitness s Four of Six s Five of Six s Six of Six s ---5--- 10.60 24.40 58.10 Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Stonegate Elementary School Page 9 of 13

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement (Most Recent Year) Stonegate has a very active core group of parents and their involvement is paramount to the core values of our school. We strongly encourage all parents to join and participate in the Parent Teacher Association (PTA). Parents are also encouraged to become involved in any and all school related events. Parents who volunteer in classrooms, the library, and other areas of the school provide a valuable service that is greatly appreciated. Please contact your child s teacher or the main office for opportunities to volunteer and/or other information regarding participating in our overall school community. State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety. Suspensions and Expulsions Rate School District State 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Suspensions------- 0.00 0.16 0.09 1.96 1.33 1.37 5.07 4.36 3.80 Expulsions------- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.13 0.10 0.09 School Safety Plan (Most Recent Year) A part of our emphasis on ensuring a safe environment for our children is training the staff in disaster preparedness, such as first aid and search and rescue techniques. Earthquake and fire drills are also conducted regularly to familiarize our students with effective emergency responses. Stonegate has developed a comprehensive Safe School Plan. Our plan is evaluated yearly and amended, as needed by the SSC or school safety planning committee. Key elements of the plan include: 1. Assessing the current status of school crime committed on the school campus and at school-related functions, 2a. Child Abuse Reporting Procedures, 2b. Disaster Procedures-Routine and Emergency, 2c. Policies for Suspension, Expulsion and Mandatory Expulsion, 2d. Procedures for Notification of Staff Regarding Dangerous Students, 2e. Policies on Sexual Harassment, 2f. Policy Relating to School Dress Code (especially gangrelated apparel), 2g. Procedures for Safe Ingress and Egress of Pupils, Parents, and School Employees To and From School, 2h. Procedures that Create a Safe and Orderly Environment Conducive to Learning at School, 2i. Rules and Procedures on School Discipline. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Stonegate Elementary School Page 10 of 13

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2014-15) AYP Criteria School District State Made AYP Overall Yes No Yes Met Participation Rate: English-Language Arts Yes Yes Yes Met Participation Rate: Mathematics Yes Yes Yes Met Percent Proficient: English-Language Arts N/A N/A N/A Met Percent Proficient: Mathematics N/A N/A N/A Met Attendance Rate Yes Yes Yes Met Graduation Rate N/A No Yes Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2015-16) Program Improvement Status Indicator School District First Year of Program Improvement 2012-2013 Year in Program Improvement* Year 3 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 7 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 46.7 Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) Level Avg. Class Size 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Number of Classes Avg. Number of Classes Avg. Number of Classes Class Class 1-20 21-32 33+ Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Size 1-20 21-32 33+ K 29 4 32 3 2 31 4 1 30 5 30 6 30 5 2 28 5 31 6 30 6 3 31 5 32 5 30 6 4 34 4 35 4 33 1 4 5 34 3 35 5 32 3 2 6 34 4 36 4 33 1 4 Note: Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class). In PI 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Stonegate Elementary School Page 11 of 13

Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2014-15) Title Number of FTE Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor Academic Counselor------- 0 0 Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) 0.6 N/A Library Media Teacher (Librarian) 0.625 N/A Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) 0.625 N/A Psychologist------- 0.8 N/A Social Worker------- 0 N/A Nurse------- 0.4 N/A Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 1.0 N/A Resource Specialist------- 1.0 N/A Other------- 0 N/A Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14) Level Total Expenditures Per Pupil Supplemental/ Restricted Basic/ Unrestricted Average Teacher Salary School Site------- $3,678 $152 $3,525 $73,566 District------- N/A N/A $4,650 $75,749 Percent Difference: School Site and District N/A N/A -24.2-2.9 State------- N/A N/A $5,348 $72,971 Percent Difference: School Site and State N/A N/A -34.1 0.8 Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2014-15) The Local Control Funding Formula has replaced California s previous method of allocating funds to school districts. In place of more than 40 specific funding categories, the new model has essentially established three sources of state funding with increased local discretion to determine how best to spend those funds in the service of students. All districts now start with a base level of perstudent funding that varies slightly depending on grade levels. Then there s supplemental funding, which adds 20 percent of the base for each English-language learner, low-income student and foster youth. Finally, there s a third pot called a concentration grant that is equal to 50 percent of the entire base. But that s only for schools and districts where English-learners, low-income students and foster youth exceed 55 percent of the total enrollment, and IUSD isn t eligible. Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14) Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $41,630 $43,165 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $74,349 $68,574 Highest Teacher Salary $96,107 $89,146 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $119,550 $111,129 Average Principal Salary (Middle) $127,346 $116,569 Average Principal Salary (High) $142,899 $127,448 Superintendent Salary $249,900 $234,382 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 39% 38% Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5% 5% For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Stonegate Elementary School Page 12 of 13

Professional Development (Most Recent Three Years) The Stonegate staff is highly dedicated to ongoing professional growth. Each year our teachers participate in eighteen hours of professional development. The division of those hours varies from year-to-year. For this school year, twelve hours of professional development will take place during two pupil free days. The remaining four hours will be spent in after school hour sessions. We focused on the implementation and strategies around Common Core integration and Positive Behavior Interventions and Support (PBIS). In addition, our continued focus on Professional Learning Communities and the integration of technology was at the forefront of our professional learning. The PLC process and planning days provided strong support for staff as we attended to the goals for the year. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Stonegate Elementary School Page 13 of 13