Focus of this Inquiry

Similar documents
Transportation Equity Analysis

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

12-month Enrollment

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Shelters Elementary School

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Educational Attainment

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

University of Arizona

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Denver Public Schools

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Raw Data Files Instructions

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Legislative Counsel Bureau and Nevada Legislature 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV Equal Opportunity Employer

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

520 HISTORY.ORG CIVICS HOW DO PEOPLE WORK TOGETHER TO SOLVE PROBLEMS?

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Best Colleges Main Survey

2018 Great Ideas Conference SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

New Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Cooper Upper Elementary School

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

ROSETTA STONE PRODUCT OVERVIEW

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Kahului Elementary School

Please complete these two forms, sign them, and return them to us in the enclosed pre paid envelope.

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Fruitvale Station Shopping Center > Retail

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Hokulani Elementary School

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Campus Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Clark Lane Middle School

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

46 Children s Defense Fund

Annual Diversity Report

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

AYP: Adequate Yearly Progress

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

THIS KIT CONTAINS ALL THE INFORMATION YOU NEED

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Measuring Being Bullied in the Context of Racial and Religious DIF. Michael C. Rodriguez, Kory Vue, José Palma University of Minnesota April, 2016

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent


Transcription:

As We Begin the Next Year s ERSEA Process, We Are Using the Cycle of Inquiry to Understand If We Are Reaching the Highest-Need Populations in Pursuit of Eliminating the Opportunity Gap Focus of this Inquiry Who are we serving in our early learning program? Are we serving those children most likely to be affected by the opportunity gap? Are there populations that we are serving too little? Too much? What else do we need to know to understand if we are serving the right populations to achieve our mission? How does this information relate to our work to reach children most likely to be affected by the opportunity gap? 2012 Public Consulting Group, Inc. 1

To Better Understand the Children and Families Served by Our Early Learning Program, We Compared Our Program Demographics Overall and by Region to the High-Need Elementary Schools in our Region and Sub-Regions PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools includes Title I-eligible schools that serve grades PK/K in districts where PSESD has at least one early learning site:* Auburn (Region 2) Bellevue (Region 4) Bethel (Regions 1, 5) Clover Park (Regions 1, 2, 5) Eatonville (Region 1) Enumclaw (Regions 1, 2) Federal Way (Regions 2, 3) Fife (Region 1) Franklin Pierce (Regions 1, 2) Highline (Regions 3, 4) Issaquah (Region 4) Kent (Regions 2, 3) Lake Washington (Region 4) Northshore (Region 4) Orting (Region 1) Peninsula (1) Puyallup (1, 2) Renton (3) Riverview (4) Shoreline (3) Skykomish (4) Snoqualmie Valley (4) Steilacoom (2) Sumner (1) Tacoma (1, 2, 5) Tahoma (3) Tukwila (3) University Place (1, 2) White River (1) *Note that Seattle schools are excluded give the size of Seattle schools and the fact that only one small PSESD early learning site is located in Seattle. Where districts are part of more than one district, the district s Title I-eligible schools are included in each regional analysis. The number and size of PSESD EL sites in each school district vary widely. Title I-eligible schools are based on FPRL percentage in a school. All schools at or above 75% FRPL are required to receive Title I funds; 2 schools at or above 35% FRPL are Title I eligible, unless the district average FRPL is less than 35% in which case schools with FRPL % down to the district average are eligible. Title I funding is determined by each district, typically based on FRPL percentage and grand span.

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, the as a Whole Serves a Larger Proportion of Black/African American and Multiracial Children and a Smaller Proportion of White and Asian Children PSESD Title I-Eligible School Enrollment and Early Learning Program Enrollment, by Race White Black/African American Two or More Races American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 10.4% 16.5% 10. 12.5% 5. 6.2% 11.1% 5.7% 2.6% 2.4% 39. 60.9% Other Race (ELMS) 2.3% (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment as of Dec 2013 = 4,456) PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (excludes Seattle) (2012-13 Enrollment = 117,009) Note: 10.3% of child records had unspecified as racial category; another 5.1% of children enrolled in the PSESD EL program did not have race data entered The new enrollment form that asks families to self-identify the race/ethnicity of their children may affect the number of families not reporting racial/ethnic categories. 3 Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, the as a Whole Serves a Larger Proportion of Hispanic Children and a Smaller Proportion of Children on IEPs or Receiving Special Education 10 Learning Program Enrollment, by Ethnicity 38.1% 22.2% 57.5% 77.8% 15% 1 5% Learning Program Enrollment, by Child Needs (IEP/Special Ed and Foster Care) 6.4% 14.1% 2.7% TBD Note: 4.4% of PSESD EL children did not have ethnicity data entered (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment as of Dec 2013 = 4,456) PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (excludes Seattle) (2012-13 Enrollment = 117,009) Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from 4

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, the as a Whole Serves a Larger Proportion of Children with Spanish, Somali, and Amharic as a Home Language and a Smaller Proportion of Children with Vietnamese, Russian, and Ukrainian as a Home Language 65.5% 57.1% PSESD Title I-Eligible School Enrollment (ELL Students) and Early Learning Program Enrollment (Children with Home Language other than English), by Home Language 8.7% 3.6% 3.4% 6.3% 3.2% 0.7% 2.6% 1.7% 2.5% 4. 1.6% 2.2% 0.8% 1.7% 0.5% 3.2% 0.5% 2. 0.3% 1.5% 0.3% 1.7% 10.1% 13.7% (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment as of Dec 2013 of children with home language other than English = 1,890) 43 children had no home language identified and are not included in the denominator Other includes 10 languages for PSESD EL children, and 174 for Title I School ELL Students PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (excludes Seattle) (2012-13 Enrollment of ELL Students = 19,452) 0.4% ELL students had English as home language; 0.3% had no home language identified Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from 5

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 1 Serves a Larger Proportion of Multiracial, American Indian, and Pacific Islander Children and a Smaller Proportion of White, Black/African American, and Asian Children Region 1 PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools includes Title I-eligible schools that serve grades PK/K in districts where PSESD has at least one early learning site: Bethel Clover Park Eatonville Enumclaw Fife Franklin Pierce Orting Peninsula Puyallup Sumner Tacoma University Place White River The number and size of PSESD EL sites in each school district vary widely. White Two or More Races Black/African American American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Native Hawaiian/Other PI Other Race (ELMS) 9.5% 14.5% 11.5% 8.8% 2.4% 3.5% 5.5% 2.2% 2.6% 3.2% 1.9% (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment = 1,075) PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (2012-13 Enrollment = 47,520) PSESD Title I-Eligible School Enrollment and Early Learning Program Enrollment, by Race 54.9% 68.4% Note: 10.3% of child records had unspecified as racial category; another 0.7% of children enrolled in the PSESD EL program did not have race data entered. 0.1% of Title- I-eligible school students did not have race data provided 6 Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 1 Serves a Larger Proportion of Hispanic Children and a Smaller Proportion of Children on IEPs or Receiving Special Education 10 Learning Program Enrollment, by Ethnicity 30.7% 19.2% 80.7% 68.6% 15% 1 5% Learning Program Enrollment, by Child Needs (IEP/Special Ed and Foster Care) 7.1% 15. 2.5% TBD Note: 0.7% of PSESD EL children did not have ethnicity data entered (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment = 1,075) PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (2012-13 Enrollment = 47,520) Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from 7

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 1 Serves a Larger Proportion of Children with Spanish as a Home Language and a Smaller Proportion of Children with Vietnamese, Russian, Samoan, and Cambodian as a Home Language 10 82.8% 66.5% PSESD Title I-Eligible School Enrollment (ELL Students) and Early Learning Program Enrollment (Children with Home Language other than English), by Home Language 4.2% 5.8% 2.1% 6.1% 2.1% 3.5% 2.1% 0.4% 0.8% 1.2% 0. 0.2% 0. 0.1% 0.4% 1.8% 0. 5.1% 0. 1.8% 0. 1.7% 5.4% 5.4% (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment as of Dec 2013 of children with home language other than English = 239) 2 children had no home language identified and are not included in the denominator Other includes 10 languages for PSESD EL children, and 174 for Title I School ELL Students PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (excludes Seattle) (2012-13 Enrollment of ELL Students = 4,343) 0.1% ELL students had English as home language; 0.3% had no home language identified Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from 8

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 2 Serves a Larger Proportion of Multiracial, Black/African American, and American Indian Children and a Smaller Proportion of White and Asian Children Region 2 PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools includes Title I-eligible schools that serve grades PK/K in districts where PSESD has at least one early learning site: Auburn Bethel Clover Park Enumclaw Federal Way Franklin Pierce Kent Puyallup Steilacoom Tacoma University Place The number and size of PSESD EL sites in each school district vary widely. White Two or More Races Black/African American American Indian/Alaskan Native Native Hawaiian/Other PI Asian Other Race (ELMS) 5.1% 6.9% 3.3% 3.3% 9. 2.6% 4.7% 10.8% 18.3% 12.7% 15. (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment = 1,030) PSESD Title I-Eligible School Enrollment and Early Learning Program Enrollment, by Race 38. 59.2% PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (2012-13 Enrollment = 68,042) Note: 10.3% of child records had unspecified as racial category; another 1% of children enrolled in the PSESD EL program did not have race data entered 9 Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 2 Serves a Larger Proportion of Hispanic Children and a Smaller Proportion of Children on IEPs or Receiving Special Education Learning Program Enrollment, by Ethnicity Learning Program Enrollment, by Child Needs (IEP/Special Ed and Foster Care) 10 39. 23. 77. 60.5% 15% 1 5% 6.5% 14.3% 3.2% TBD Note: 0.5% of PSESD EL children did not have ethnicity data entered (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment = 1,030) PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (2012-13 Enrollment = 68,042) Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from 10

10 Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 2 Serves a Larger Proportion of Children with Spanish as a Home Language and a Smaller Proportion of Children with All Other Languages as a Home Language 84.9% 58.1% PSESD Title I-Eligible School Enrollment (ELL Students) and Early Learning Program Enrollment (Children with Home Language other than English), by Home Language 2. 5.2% 2. 5.1% 1.3% 2.3% 1.3% 1.8% 1. 2.8% 0.7% 2.5% 0.3% 4.7% 0.3% 1.7% 0. 2.7% 0. 1.5% 0. 0.3% 6.2% 10.7% (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment as of Dec 2013 of children with home language other than English = 305) 4 children had no home language identified and are not included in the denominator Other includes 10 languages for PSESD EL children, and 174 for Title I School ELL Students PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (excludes Seattle) (2012-13 Enrollment of ELL Students = 10,974) 0.3% ELL students had English as home language; 0.3% had no home language identified Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from 11

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 3 Serves a Larger Proportion of Black/African American Children and a Smaller Proportion of White, Asian, American Indian, Multiracial and Native Hawaiian/PI Children Region 3 PSESD Title I- Eligible Schools includes Title I-eligible schools that serve grades PK/K in districts where PSESD has at least one early learning site*: Federal Way Highline Kent Renton Tahoma Tukwila *excludes Seattle The number and size of PSESD EL sites in each school district vary widely. White Black/African American Two or More Races Asian American Indian/Alaskan Native Native Hawaiian/Other PI Other Race (ELMS) PSESD Title I-Eligible School Enrollment and Early Learning Program Enrollment, by Race 10.6% 4.9% 3.4% 2. 1.7% 13.4% 24.8% 11.1% 8.9% 16.2% 8.3% 31.4% 45.2% (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment = 1,213) PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (excludes Seattle) (2012-13 Enrollment = 41,729) Note: 9.5% of child records had unspecified as racial category; another 8.5% of children enrolled in the PSESD EL program did not have race data entered. 0.1% of Title- I-eligible school students did not have race data provided Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from 12

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 3 Serves a Larger Proportion of Hispanic Children and a Smaller Proportion of Children on IEPs or Receiving Special Education 10 Learning Program Enrollment, by Ethnicity 37.6% 28. 72. 53.8% 15% 1 5% Learning Program Enrollment, by Child Needs (IEP/Special Ed and Foster Care) 5. 13.4% 2.1% TBD Note: 8.6% of PSESD EL children did not have ethnicity data entered (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment = 1,213) PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (excludes Seattle) (2012-13 Enrollment = 41,729) Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from 13

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 3 Serves a Larger Proportion of Children with Somali or Arabic as a Home Language, a Smaller Proportion of Children with Vietnamese and Ukrainian as a Home Language, and a Similar Proportion of Children with Spanish as a Home Language 53.2% 54.3% PSESD Title I-Eligible School Enrollment (ELL Students) and Early Learning Program Enrollment (Children with Home Language other than English), by Home Language 16.5% 6. 3.7% 2. 3.1% 3.1% 2.5% 7.4% 2.2% 3.2% 1.9% 1.1% 1.2% 3.6% 0.6% 1.8% 0.4% 1.4% 0.4% 0.9% 0.1% 1.3% 14. 13.3% (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment as of Dec 2013 of children with home language other than English = 678) 25 children had no home language identified and are not included in the denominator Other includes 10 languages for PSESD EL children, and 174 for Title I School ELL Students PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (excludes Seattle) (2012-13 Enrollment of ELL Students = 11,009) 0.4% of ELL students had English as home language; 0.2% had no home language identified Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from 14

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 4 Serves a Larger Proportion of Black/African American and American Indian Children and a Smaller Proportion of White and Asian Children Region 4 PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools includes Title I- eligible schools that serve grades PK/K in districts where PSESD has at least one early learning site: Bellevue Highline Issaquah Lake Washington Northshore Riverview Shoreline Skykomish Snoqualmie Valley White Black/African American Asian American Indian/Alaskan Native Two or More Races Native Hawaiian/Other PI Other Race (ELMS) PSESD Title I-Eligible School Enrollment and Early Learning Program Enrollment, by Race 1.8% 1.5% 1.4% 6.2% 13.5% 9.6% 6.5% 9.5% 9.2% 8.3% 17.2% 31.6% 62.8% The number and size of PSESD EL sites in each school district vary widely. (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment = 998) PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (2012-13 Enrollment = 33,873) Note: 11.6% of child records had unspecified as racial category; another 9.2% of children enrolled in the PSESD EL program did not have race data entered Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from 15

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 4 Serves a Larger Proportion of Hispanic Children and a Smaller Proportion of Children on IEPs or Receiving Special Education Learning Program Enrollment, by Ethnicity Learning Program Enrollment, by Child Needs (IEP/Special Ed and Foster Care) 10 44.3% 49. 23.6% 76.4% 15% 1 5% 6.5% 14.2% 2.5% TBD Note: 6.7% of PSESD EL children did not have ethnicity data entered (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment = 998) PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (2012-13 Enrollment = 33,873) Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from 16

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 4 Serves a Larger Proportion of Children with Somali or Amharic as a Home Language and a Similar Proportion of Children with Spanish or Vietnamese as a Home Language 60.9% 60.6% PSESD Title I-Eligible School Enrollment (ELL Students) and Early Learning Program Enrollment (Children with Home Language other than English), by Home Language 8.1% 2.9% 7.6% 1.4% 5.8% 6.1% 2.8% 2.1% 1.8% 1.5% 1.6% 2. 0.5% 1.4% 0.5% 0.7% 0.2% 1.6% 0. 1.1% 0. 0.4% 10.2% 17.3% (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment as of Dec 2013 of children with home language other than English = 616) 3 children had no home language identified and are not included in the denominator Other includes 10 languages for PSESD EL children, and 174 for Title I School ELL Students PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (excludes Seattle) (2012-13 Enrollment of ELL Students = 6,131) 0.8% of ELL students had English as home language; 0.2% had no home language identified Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from 17

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 5 Serves a Larger Proportion of Multiracial and American Indian Children and a Smaller Proportion of White, Black/African American, and Asian Children Region 5 PSESD Title I- Eligible Schools includes Title I-eligible schools that serve grades PK/K in districts where PSESD has at least one early learning site: Bethel Clover Park Tacoma Excludes Peninsula School District (where WCCW EHS program is located) White Two or More Races American Indian/Alaskan Native Black/African American Asian Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander PSESD Title I-Eligible School Enrollment and Early Learning Program Enrollment, by Race 3.3% 10. 6.9% 2.9% 3.2% 0.7% 7.7% 15.7% 16.1% 10. 42.1% 62.8% (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment = 140) PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (2012-13 Enrollment = 28,487) Note: 8.6% of child records had unspecified as racial category; another 1 of children enrolled in the PSESD EL program did not have race data entered 18 Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 5 Serves a Larger Proportion of Hispanic Children and Children in Foster Care and a Modestly Smaller Proportion of Children on IEPs or Receiving Special Education Learning Program Enrollment, by Ethnicity Learning Program Enrollment, by Child Needs (IEP/Special Ed and Foster Care) 10 48.6% 21. 44.3% 79. 15% 1 5% 10.7% 14. 5.7% TBD Note: 7.1% of PSESD EL children did not have ethnicity data entered (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment = 140) PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (2012-13 Enrollment = 28,487) Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from 19

Compared to Local Title I-Eligible Schools, Region 5 Serves a Larger Proportion of Children with Spanish and Arabic as a Home Language, a Smaller Proportion of Children with Vietnamese, Russian, Samoan, or Tagalog, and a Similar Proportion with Cambodian and Korean as a Home Language 10 86.5% 62.7% PSESD Title I-Eligible School Enrollment (ELL Students) and Early Learning Program Enrollment (Children with Home Language other than English), by Home Language 5.8% 6.5% 1.9% 1.3% 1.9% 0.8% 0. 7.7% 0. 6.3% 0. 3.9% 0. 2.2% 0. 1.6% 0. 0.3% 0. 0.2% 0. 0.1% 3.8% 6.1% (2013-14 Cumulative enrollment as of Dec 2013 of children with home language other than English = 52) 9 children had no home language identified and are not included in the denominator PSESD Title I-Eligible Schools (excludes Seattle) (2012-13 Enrollment of ELL Students = 2,950) of ELL students had English as home language; 0.3% had no home language identified 20 Sources: OSPI for Title I-eligible school data, ChildPlus and ELMS for data. Data for is from 2013-14, and from

Small Group Discussion In small groups, we will discuss the data for the Early Learning program as a whole (slides 2-5), and for the region of your small group. (Everyone should be sitting at a table with others from the same region.) Which of these findings confirms what you already knew, or what you would have expected? What surprised you? What does this information spark for you in terms of your work? How is it relevant to your work? What questions does the data bring up for you? What additional information or analysis would you like to see to deepen the inquiry and think about implications? Use flipcharts to note 1) surprises, 2) relevance to your work, and 3) questions/other data you d like to see. Each group will share back with the larger group. 21