Areas to investigate. Writing progress was in the top quintile (20%) for at least two years

Similar documents
Plans for Pupil Premium Spending

Ferry Lane Primary School

Approval Authority: Approval Date: September Support for Children and Young People

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

Pupil Premium Grants. Information for Parents. April 2016

Inspection dates Overall effectiveness Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school

CARDINAL NEWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL

Newlands Girls School

Archdiocese of Birmingham

Eastbury Primary School

Short inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ

PUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

Alma Primary School. School report. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. Inspection dates March 2015

Tutor Trust Secondary

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

Applications from foundation doctors to specialty training. Reporting tool user guide. Contents. last updated July 2016

Cottesmore St Mary Catholic Primary School Pupil premium strategy

Effective Pre-school and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11)

Milton Keynes Schools Speech and Language Therapy Service. Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust. Additional support for schools

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

St Philip Howard Catholic School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Putnoe Primary School

Archdiocese of Birmingham

Oasis Academy Coulsdon

Woodlands Primary School. Policy for the Education of Children in Care

DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS

Shelters Elementary School

Pentyrch Primary School Ysgol Gynradd Pentyrch

Oasis Academy South Bank

This has improved to above national from 95.1 % in 2013 to 96.83% in 2016 Attainment

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Pupil Premium Impact Assessment

5 Early years providers

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

St Matthew s RC High School, Nuthurst Road, Moston, Manchester, M40 0EW

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Diary Dates Half Term First Day Back Friday 4th April

DFE Number: 318/3315 URN Number: Headteacher: Mrs C. Moreland Chair of Governors: Mrs. D. Long

Preparing for the School Census Autumn 2017 Return preparation guide. English Primary, Nursery and Special Phase Schools Applicable to 7.

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Allington Primary School Inspection report - amended

Total amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:

or by at:

Teacher of Art & Design (Maternity Cover)

Changes to GCSE and KS3 Grading Information Booklet for Parents

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Educational Attainment

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE. Full terms and conditions of use:

Creative Media Department Assessment Policy

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

Head of Maths Application Pack

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

Best Colleges Main Survey

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Serious doubts about school effectiveness Stephen Gorard a a

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

The Curriculum in Primary Schools

St Matthew s RC High School

East Riding of Yorkshire SACRE Report 2012/13

École Jeannine Manuel Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DN

Bellehaven Elementary

APPLICANT S INFORMATION PACK

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND

Family Liaison Officer. Sports Coach. Play Therapist. Breakfast Club Leader. Afterschool Club. Senior Midday Supervisor. Road Crossing Patrol

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring SOSCA. Feedback Information

Guide for primary schools

Financing Education In Minnesota

Investigating the Relationship between Ethnicity and Degree Attainment

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Summary: Impact Statement

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

Application for Postgraduate Studies (Research)

Rwanda. Out of School Children of the Population Ages Percent Out of School 10% Number Out of School 217,000

Assessment booklet Assessment without levels and new GCSE s

SEN INFORMATION REPORT

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Local authority National Indicator Map 2009

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Woodhouse Primary School Sports Spending

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne

Using Proportions to Solve Percentage Problems I

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Kenya: Age distribution and school attendance of girls aged 9-13 years. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 20 December 2012

Horizon Community College SEND Policy. Amended: June 2017 Ratified: July 2017

SEND INFORMATION REPORT

Evaluation of pupil premium grant expenditure 2015/16 Review Date: 16th July 2016

Transcription:

Primary A Inspection Data Summary Report Areas to investigate KS2 progress Reading progress was in the top quintile (2%) for at least two years for all pupils, middle prior attainers and disadvantaged pupils. Writing progress was in the top quintile (2%) for at least two years for all pupils, middle prior attainers and high prior attainers. Mathematics progress was in the top quintile (2%) for at least two years for all pupils and middle prior attainers. Progress in writing was significantly above average and in the highest 1%. KS2 attainment In 218, reading, writing and mathematics attainment of the expected standard was at or above national for prior attainment groups: middle, high. In 218, 87% of pupils achieved the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics, 23 percentage points above the national proportion. This was a statistically significant difference. The three-year average reading attainment score (18.3) was in the top 1%. The three-year average mathematics attainment score (17.) was in the top 1%. KS1 attainment There were no meaningful trends or differences for this measure. Phonics in 218 The average mark for pupils not meeting the phonics expected standard in year 1 was 18. Notes: The majority of areas to investigate will not appear for small cohorts, and some are based on data not contained in this report. Progress measures are based on adjusted progress scores. Page 1

Primary A Inspection Data Summary Report Areas to investigate Behaviour There were no permanent exclusions in the last three years. The national average in each of these years was zero. In 216/17, there were no fixed term exclusions. The national average rate for schools with a similar level of deprivation was.38%. In 216/17, there were no repeat exclusions. The national average rate for schools with a similar level of deprivation was.18%. Notes: The majority of areas to investigate will not appear for small cohorts, and some are based on data not contained in this report. Progress measures are based on adjusted progress scores. Page 2

Primary S Inspection Data Summary Report School context in 218 Phase of education: Primary Headteacher: Bill James Pupils: 48 Gender: Mixed Deprivation Quintile: Lowest 4% (.1) Ethnicity Local authority: Hampshire Admissions policy: Not applicable Ages: 4-11 Denomination: Roman Catholic Special needs provision: The largest ethnic groups are: White - British (63.1%), White - any other White background (12.%), Asian or Asian British - Indian (6.7%), Asian or Asian British - any other Asian background (3.9%),Black or Black British - African (4.6%). This school has 14 out of 17 possible ethnic groups. The average number of groups for this phase of education is 9. Number on roll Girls The school was in the top 2% of all schools for the number of pupils (48). The percentage of girls in year 1 (8%) and year 2 (6%) was higher than all other year groups. Ever 6 FSM %: 7. English additional language %: 19.8 SEN support %: 24. SEN with EHC plan %: 1.2 The percentage of girls in year 3 (4%) was lower than all other year groups. The school was in the lowest 2% of all schools for the proportion of FSM (7.%). There were no children looked after in the school. English as an Additional Language There was nothing significant to report for this group. Notes: Context sentences provide background information for inspectors. This is historic data for pupils as of the January 218 census. For example year in 218 is the school s current year 6 cohort. Ethnicity and CLA sentences appear for every school. For further information on methodology see www.gov.uk/government/collections/using-ofsteds-inspection-dashboard Page 3

Primary S Inspection Data Summary Report School context 218 Special Educational Needs The school was in the top 2% of all schools for the proportion of SEN support (24.%). The percentage of SEN in year 1 (4%) was higher than all other year groups. The percentage of SEN in year (21%) was lower than all other year groups. Prior Attainment Pupil prior attainment was well above the national comparator for the following: Reading (year 4), Mathematics (year 4) Notes: Context sentences provide background information for inspectors. This is historic data for pupils as of the January 218 census. For example year in 218 is the school s current year 6 cohort. Ethnicity and CLA sentences appear for every school. For further information on methodology see www.gov.uk/government/collections/using-ofsteds-inspection-dashboard Page 4

Key Relative stage 2 Relative progress for the past three years Progress quintiles based on rank of progress score () Cohort Significantly above national Significantly below national Reading Bottom 2% Top 2% Q Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Writing Bottom 2% Top 2% Q Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Mathematics Bottom 2% Top 2% Q Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Overall 216 (66) Overall 217 (68) Overll 218 (69) Low at KS1 216 (6) Low at KS1 217 () Low at KS1 218 (4) Middle at KS1 216 (36) Middle at KS1 217 (37) Middle at KS1 218 (3) High at KS1 216 (24) High at KS1 217 (26) High at KS1 218 (3) 216 (11) 217 (7) 218 (6) (66) (68) (69) (6) () (4) (36) (37) (3) (24) (26) (3) (11) (7) (6) (66) (68) (69) (6) () (4) (36) (37) (3) (24) (26) (3) (11) (7) (6) Notes: Statistical significance for disadvantaged pupils is against the national for other pupils. Change in methodology or calculations is indicated by a dotted line. Quintiles for 218 are based on adjusted progress scores. Previous years are based on unadjusted. Significance is only flagged for cohorts greater than 1. For cohorts of 1 or less information is greyed out. For further information on methodology see www.gov.uk/government/collections/using-ofsteds-inspection-dashboard Page

Key Reading stage 2 Reading progress in 218 Reading progress scatterplot Bottom 1% Top 1% Other national Significantly above national and in top 1% Significantly below national and in bottom 1% Other SEN Not SEN Low at KS1 Middle at KS1 High at KS1-11 11 Progress 3.1. 4. 1.8 2.9 National...../.3 Number of pupils included 69 4 3 3 6 Number of adjusted pupils Key stage 2 progress Below average Above average 2 16 12 8 4-4 -8-12 -16 National -11 Average progress 11 Note: nationals are shown as all/other -2 1 1 2 Key stage 1 prior attainment 2 Notes: Progress measures are based on adjusted progress scores. Significance is only flagged for cohorts greater than 1. For cohorts of 1 or fewer, information is shown in grey. Prior attainment is based on overall KS1 attainment. For further information on methodology see www.gov.uk/government/collections/using-ofsteds-inspection-dashboard Page 6

Key Writing stage 2 Writing progress in 218 Writing progress scatterplot Bottom 1% Top 1% Other national Significantly above national and in top 1% Significantly below national and in bottom 1% Other SEN Not SEN Low at KS1 Middle at KS1 High at KS1-1 1 Progress 2.8-4.4 2.9 3.7.2 National...../.2 Number of pupils included 69 4 3 3 6 Number of adjusted pupils Key stage 2 progress Below average Above average 2 16 12 8 4-4 -8-12 -16 National -1 Average progress 1 Note: nationals are shown as all/other -2 1 1 2 Key stage 1 prior attainment 2 Notes: Progress measures are based on adjusted progress scores. Significance is only flagged for cohorts greater than 1. For cohorts of 1 or fewer, information is shown in grey. Prior attainment is based on overall KS1 attainment. For further information on methodology see www.gov.uk/government/collections/using-ofsteds-inspection-dashboard Page 7

Key Mathematics stage 2 Mathematics progress in 218 Mathematics progress scatterplot Bottom 1% Top 1% Other national Significantly above national and in top 1% Significantly below national and in bottom 1% Other SEN Not SEN Low at KS1 Middle at KS1 High at KS1-9 9 Progress 2. 3. 3.2 1. -.6 National...../.3 Number of pupils included 69 4 3 3 6 Number of adjusted pupils Key stage 2 progress Below average Above average 2 16 12 8 4-4 -8-12 -16 National -9 Average progress 9 Note: nationals are shown as all/other -2 1 1 2 Key stage 1 prior attainment 2 Notes: Progress measures are based on adjusted progress scores. Significance is only flagged for cohorts greater than 1. For cohorts of 1 or fewer, information is shown in grey. Prior attainment is based on overall KS1 attainment. For further information on methodology see www.gov.uk/government/collections/using-ofsteds-inspection-dashboard Page 8

Key R stage 2 in 218 Reading scaled scores 218 This chart shows the distribution of total marks achieved by pupils in the school compared to the national. National level Not achieved expected standard Achieved expected standard Cohort = 7 One pupil relates to 1.4 percentage points. In 218, 93% of pupils achieved the expected standard, 18 percentage points above the national. This was a statistically significant difference. 8 7 6 Number of pupils 4 3 2 1 8+ 9+ 1+ 11+ 12+ Expected standard Reading scaled score Notes: The plotted national line is the national reading percentage multiplied by the school reading attainment cohort at each average scaled score interval. For further information on methodology see www.gov.uk/government/collections/using-ofsteds-inspection-dashboard Page 9

Key M stage 2 in 218 Mathematics scaled scores 218 This chart shows the distribution of total marks achieved by pupils in the school compared to the national. National level Not achieved expected standard Achieved expected standard Cohort = 7 One pupil relates to 1.4 percentage points. In 218, 93% of pupils achieved the expected standard, 17 percentage points above the national. This was a statistically significant difference. 8 7 6 Number of pupils 4 3 2 1 8+ 9+ 1+ 11+ 12+ Expected standard Mathematics scaled score Notes: The plotted national line is the national mathematics percentage multiplied by the school mathematics attainment cohort at each average scaled score interval. For further information on methodology see www.gov.uk/government/collections/using-ofsteds-inspection-dashboard Page 1

Key stage 1 in 218 Reading Writing Expected+ % Greater depth % National for all pupils Other national Expected+ % Greater depth % National for all pupils Other national 2 4 6 8 1 % diff Diff No Cohort 2 4 6 8 1 % diff Diff No Cohort 7 9 6 7 7 7 7 7-3/-39-26/-29-1/-1-1/-1-3/-34-16/-18-1/-1 / 2 Mathematics 4 6 8 1 Science 2 4 6 8 1 Expected+ % Greater depth % National for all pupils Other national Expected+ % National for all pupils Other national 2 4 6 8 1 % diff 8 11 Diff No 7 Cohort 7 7 2 4 6 8 1 % diff 2-23/-26 Diff No 1-1/-1 Cohort 7-36/-4-22/-2-1/-1-1/-1 2 4 6 8 1 2 4 6 8 1 Note: 'Diff no' value shows the number of pupils that the difference between school and national represents, and is always rounded down to a whole number. nationals are shown as all/other (other relates to pupils who are not defined as disadvantaged). For science the only outcome of the teacher assessment was whether pupils met the expected standard. For further information on methodology see www.gov.uk/government/collections/using-ofsteds-inspection-dashboard Page 11

Phonics Y in 218 Year 1 phonics marks 218 This chart shows the distribution of total marks achieved by pupils in the school compared to the national. National level Not achieved expected standard Achieved expected standard Cohort = 62 One pupil relates to 1.6 percentage points. In 218, 82% of pupils achieved the expected standard, in line with the national proportion. 7 6 Number of pupils 4 3 2 1 + 1+ 2+ 3+ 4+ Expected standard Total marks gained Notes: The plotted national line is the national phonics attainment percentage at each phonics mark multiplied by the whole school phonics attainment cohort. The expected standard for phonics is 32+. For further information on methodology see www.gov.uk/government/collections/using-ofsteds-inspection-dashboard Page 12