End-of-Course Tests Spring 2009 April 27, 2009 June 5, 2009

Similar documents
College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Jefferson County School District Testing Plan

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Idaho Public Schools

Transportation Equity Analysis

African American Male Achievement Update

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

New Hanover County Schools Announce the Results for the READY Assessments and Report the Highest Graduation Rate to Date

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

World s Best Workforce Plan

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

Cooper Upper Elementary School

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Shelters Elementary School

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

Georgia Department of Education

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

Reteach Book. Grade 2 PROVIDES. Tier 1 Intervention for Every Lesson

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Student Learning Objectives Overview for New Districts

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

Kahului Elementary School

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

Testing Schedule. Explained

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

Florida A&M University Graduate Policies and Procedures

Restorative Measures In Schools Survey, 2011

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Native American Education Board Update

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Hokulani Elementary School

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

ADVANCED AND HONORS DIPLOMAS (BEGINNING WITH THE GRADUATING CLASS OF 2013)

HIGH SCHOOL PREP PROGRAM APPLICATION For students currently in 7th grade

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE (HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING)

FLORIDA. -Mindingall. Portilla Dr. Wilbert. endent of School. Superinte. Associate Curriculum. Assistant

Robert Bennis Elementary School

AB 167/216 Graduation. kids-alliance.org/programs/education. Alliance for Children s Rights

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

Principal vacancies and appointments

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

A Pilot Study on Pearson s Interactive Science 2011 Program

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

STEM SMART Workshop Las Vegas - Sept 19, 2012

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Answer Key For The California Mathematics Standards Grade 1

Educational Attainment

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Pierce County Schools. Pierce Truancy Reduction Protocol. Dr. Joy B. Williams Superintendent

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

46 Children s Defense Fund

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Mathematics Levels 12 14

Executive Summary. DoDEA Virtual High School

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Data Diskette & CD ROM

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

AIS/RTI Mathematics. Plainview-Old Bethpage

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Welcome Parents! Class of 2021

Albany Technical College Overview Goals Student Success and Implementation Team Conclusion Next Steps...

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Transcription:

TESTING BRIEF End-of-Course Tests Spring 9 April 27, 9 June 5, 9 Georgia law (O.C.G.A. -2-281) states the State Board of Education shall adopt end-ofcourse assessments for students in grades 9 through 12 for all core subjects to be determined by the state board. The purposes of the End-of-Course Tests are to assess student achievement in either the Georgia Performance Standards (GPS) or the Quality Core Curriculum (QCC) in the designated core courses and to provide diagnostic data to improve student achievement. Definitions for student achievement as defined by Georgia teachers at the Meets Standard performance level and the Exceeds Standard performance level are outlined in the EOCT Interpretive Guide and on the Individual Student Report for each content area. The EOCT assess only a sample of the knowledge and skills that educators agree comprise a complete curriculum for each subject. Georgia students have opportunities to learn and are expected to master much more than the tests address. The Georgia Performance Standards are the source of the knowledge and skills assessed on the End-of-Course Tests in the content areas of English language arts, Science and Social Studies. As the high school mathematics curriculum transitions to GPS, the Algebra I and Geometry courses and EOCT are being replaced by Mathematics I and Mathematics II. Administration of the End-of-Course Tests supports goal 1 of the Superintendent s Strategic Plan: Increase high school graduation rate, decrease high-school dropout rate, and increase postsecondary enrollment rate. This is achieved through providing an effective assessment system that is aligned with the Georgia Performance Standards and designed to improve student achievement. 1

KEY FINDINGS LANGUAGE ARTS NINTH GRADE LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION o Seventy-six (76) percent of Georgia s ninth grade students met or exceeded the standard for Ninth Grade Literature and Composition. o When comparing the Spring 9 scores to the Spring 8 scores, the percent of students meeting or exceeding the standard increased by three (3) percentage points in Ninth Grade Literature and Composition. o The percent of students achieving the Exceeds standard performance level in Ninth Grade Literature and Composition increased by nine (9) percentage points from Spring 8 to Spring 9 o The 9 Strategic Plan target for the percentage of students meeting and exceeding the Ninth Grade Literature and Composition standard on the EOCT was 74%. This target was exceeded. AMERICAN LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION o Eighty-six (86) percent of Georgia s students met or exceeded the standard for American Literature and Composition. o When comparing the Spring 9 scores to Spring 8, the percent of students meeting or exceeding the standard increased by two (2) percentage points in American Literature and Composition. o The percent of students achieving the Exceeds standard performance level in American Literature remained the same from Spring 8 to Spring 9. o The 9 Strategic Plan target for the percentage of students meeting and exceeding the American Literature and Composition standard was 85%. This target was exceeded. 2

KEY FINDINGS SCIENCE BIOLOGY o Sixty-four (64) percent of Georgia s students met or exceeded the standard for Biology. o When comparing the Spring 9 scores to Spring 8, the percent of students meeting or exceeding the standard increased by two (2) percentage points in Biology. o The percent of students achieving the Exceeds standard performance level in Biology increased by four (4) percentage points in Biology from Spring 8 to Spring 9. o The 9 Strategic Plan target for the percentage of students meeting and exceeding the Biology standard on the EOCT was 63%. This target was exceeded. PHYSICAL SCIENCE o Sixty-seven (67) percent of Georgia s students met or exceeded the standard for Physical Science. o When comparing the Spring 9 scores to the Spring 8, the percent of students meeting or exceeding the standard increased by four (4) percentage points in Physical Science. o The percent of students achieving the Exceeds standard performance level in Physical Science increased by one (1) percentage point in Physical Science from Spring 8 to Spring 9. o The 9 Strategic Plan target for the percentage of students meeting and exceeding the Physical Science standard on the EOCT was 64 %. This target was exceeded. 3

KEY FINDINGS SOCIAL STUDIES U.S. HISTORY o Sixty () percent of Georgia s students met or exceeded the standard for U.S. History. o When comparing the Spring 9 scores to the spring 8, the percent of students meeting or exceeding the standard increased by one (1) percentage point in U. S. History. o The percent of students achieving at the Exceeds standard performance level in U.S. History increased by five (5) percentage points from Spring 8 to Spring 9. o The 9 Strategic Plan target for the percentage of students meeting and exceeding the U. S. History standard on the EOCT was %. This target was met. ECONOMICS/BUSINESS/FREE ENTERPRISE o Sixty-eight (68) percent of Georgia s students met or exceeded the standard for Economics/Business/Free Enterprise. o When comparing the Spring 9 scores to the spring 8, the percent of students meeting or exceeding the standard remained the same in Economics. o The percent of students achieving at the Exceeds standard performance level in Economics increased by three (3) percentage points from Spring 8 to Spring 9. o The 9 Strategic Plan target for the percentage of students meeting and exceeding the Economics standard on the EOCT was 7%. This target was not met. 4

KEY FINDINGS - MATHEMATICS ALGEBRA I o Forty () percent of Georgia s students met or exceeded the standard for Algebra I. o When comparing the Spring 9 scores to the spring 8, the percent of students meeting or exceeding the standard decreased by fifteen (15) percentage points in Algebra I. o The percent of students achieving at the Exceeds standard performance level in Algebra I decreased by fifteen (15) percentage points from Spring 8 to Spring 9. o The 9 Strategic Plan target for the percentage of students meeting and exceeding the Algebra I standard on the EOCT was 65%. This target was not met. GEOMETRY o Forty (47) percent of Georgia s students met or exceeded the standard for Geometry. o When comparing the Spring 9 scores to the spring 8, the percent of students meeting or exceeding the standard decreased by fourteen (14) percentage points in Geometry. o The percent of students achieving at the Exceeds standard performance level in Geometry decreased by fourteen (14) percentage points from Spring 8 to Spring 9. o The 9 Strategic Plan target for the percentage of students meeting and exceeding the Geometry standard on the EOCT was 65%. This target was not met. Participants in the Algebra I and Geometry EOCT represent a smaller group of students that were enrolled in high school prior to Fall 8. These two tests are aligned to the Quality Core Curriculum (QCC) and will continue to be available until the 1/11 school year. As the high school mathematics curriculum transitions to GPS, the Algebra I and Geometry courses and EOCT will be replaced by Mathematics I and Mathematics II. During the 8/9 school year, Mathematics I and Mathematics II were field tested and no results at any level (state, system, school, or student) are available. Students were granted a waiver for the 15% grade requirement for the 8/9 school year. To provide information about the Mathematics I EOCT, GaDOE is releasing thirty (3) items along with item level data the percent of students who selected each response option. Each system and school will receive an item level data report. Additionally, each item has been annotated by the Mathematics curriculum staff. 5

KEY FINDINGS ECIAL POPULATIONS When comparing the Spring 9 scores to Spring 8, the percent of English Language Learners (ELL) students meeting or exceeding the standards increased across multiple subject specific tests: o In Ninth Grade Literature and Composition the percent of ELL students meeting or exceeding the standards increased by eleven (11) percentage points. o In American Literature and Composition the percent of ELL students meeting or exceeding the standards increased by ten (1) percentage points. o In Biology the percent of ELL students meeting or exceeding the standards increased by three (3) percentage points. o In Physical Science the percent of ELL students meeting or exceeding the standards increased by five (5) percentage points. o In U.S. History the percent of ELL students meeting or exceeding the standards increased by seven (7) percentage points. o In Economics the percent of ELL students meeting or exceeding the standards increased by one (1) percentage point. When comparing the Spring 9 scores to Spring 8, the percent of Students with Disabilities meeting or exceeding standards increased across multiple subject specific tests: o In Ninth Grade Literature and Composition the percent of Students with Disabilities meeting or exceeding the standards increased by five (5) percentage points. o In American Literature and Composition the percent of Students with Disabilities meeting or exceeding the standards increased by four (4) percentage points. o In Biology the percent of Students with Disabilities meeting or exceeding the standards increased by two (2) percentage points. o In Physical Science the percent of Students with Disabilities meeting or exceeding the standards increased by three (3) percentage points. 6

Percent in Performance Level (All Students) - EOCT Spring 9 Performance Ninth Grade American Biology Physical U.S. Economics Algebra I Literature and Literature and Science History Level Composition Composition Does Not Meet 24 14 36 33 32 53 Meets Standard 47 58 39 38 33 29 34 Exceeds Standard 29 28 25 29 27 28 11 13 Geometry ALL Students Spring 9: Percent in Performance Level 1 8 24 47 29 14 58 28 36 39 25 33 38 29 3327 32 28 29 11 53 34 13 DNM Meets Exceeds Ninth Grade Literature American Literature Biology Physical Science US History Economics Algebra I Geometry 7

Historical Performance of Students on the Georgia EOCT Percent of Students Meeting and Exceeding Standard on EOCT Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 Ninth Grade Literature 73 74 76 American Literature 84 83 86 Biology 62 62 64 Physical Science 63 64 67 U.S. History 59 49 Economics 68 7 68 Algebra I 55 Geometry 61 51 47 EOCT Historical Comparisons 1 84 83 86 8 73 74 76 62 62 64 63 64 67 59 49 68 7 68 55 61 51 47 Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 Ninth Grade Literature American Literature Biology Physical Science US History Economics Algebra I Geometry 8

Historical Performance by Subject on the Georgia EOCT Ninth Grade Literature and Composition Performance Level Does Not Meet Meets 8 Percent of Students WI 8 9 27 26 24 53 5 47 1 8 Ninth Grade Literature & Composition 27 26 24 53 5 47 29 24 DNM Meets Exceeds 8 WI8 9 Exceeds 24 29 American Literature and Composition Performance Level 8 Percent of Students WI 8 9 Does Not Meet 16 17 14 Meets 56 58 58 Exceeds 28 24 28 American Literature & Composition 1 8 56 58 58 28 24 28 1617 14 DNM Meets Exceeds 8 WI8 9 9

Historical Performance by Subject on the Georgia EOCT Biology Biology Performance Level 8 Percent of Students WI 8 9 Does Not Meet 38 38 36 1 8 3838 36 45 39 21 17 25 8 WI8 9 Meets 45 39 DNM Meets Exceeds Exceeds 21 17 25 Performance Level Physical Science 8 Percent of Students WI 8 9 Does Not Meet 37 36 33 Meets 35 35 38 1 8 Physical Science 37 36 33 35 35 38 2829 29 DNM Meets Exceeds 8 WI8 9 Exceeds 28 29 29 1

Historical Performance by Subject on the Georgia EOCT Performance Level U.S. History 8 Percent of Students WI 8 9 Does Not Meet 41 51 Meets 37 34 33 Exceeds 22 15 27 1 8 51 41 US History 37 34 33 22 15 27 DNM Meets Exceeds 8 WI8 9 Performance Level Economics 8 Percent of Students WI 8 9 Does Not Meet 32 3 32 Meets 44 45 1 8 Economics 32 3 32 4445 2525 28 DNM Meets Exceeds 8 WI8 9 Exceeds 25 25 28 11

Historical Performance by Subject on the Georgia EOCT Performance Level Algebra I 8 Percent of Students WI 8 9 Does Not Meet 45 Meets 29 29 29 Exceeds 26 12 11 1 8 Algebra I 45 29 29 29 26 12 11 DNM Meets Exceeds 8 WI8 9 Performance Level Geometry 8 Percent of Students WI 8 9 Does Not Meet 39 49 53 Meets 34 36 34 Exceeds 27 15 13 1 8 Geometry 49 53 39 34 36 34 27 15 13 DNM Meets Exceeds 8 WI8 9 12

Historical Performance of Sub-Groups on the Georgia EOCT Ninth Grade Literature Percent of Students Meeting and Exceeding Standard & Composition Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 Change from 8 to 9 All Students 73 74 76 +3 English Language Learners 24 39 35 +11 Students with Disabilities 33 38 38 +5 Asian 87 85 87 No Change Black 64 66 +6 Hispanic 63 7 67 +4 Native American/Alaskan 69 65 78 +9 White 84 84 86 +2 Multiracial 79 72 75-4 Ninth Grade Literature & Composition 1 Percent Meets or Exceeds 9 8 7 5 3 73 74 76 39 38 38 35 33 24 87 85 87 7 64 66 67 63 69 65 78 84 84 86 79 75 72 1 Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 13

Historical Performance of Sub-Groups on the Georgia EOCT American Literature Percent of Students Meeting and Exceeding Standard & Composition Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 Change from 8 to 9 All Students 84 83 86 +2 English Language Learners 43 43 53 +1 Students with Disabilities 49 52 53 +4 Asian 88 86 91 +3 Black 75 76 79 +4 Hispanic 74 77 79 +5 Native American/Alaskan 87 92 89 +2 White 91 9 92 +1 Multiracial 88 76 85-3 American Literature & Composition Percent Meets or Exceeds 1 9 8 7 5 3 86 84 83 53 52 53 49 43 43 91 88 86 79 79 75 76 77 74 92 89 87 91 92 9 88 76 85 1 Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 14

Historical Performance of Sub-Groups on the Georgia EOCT Biology Percent of Students Meeting and Exceeding Standard Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 Change from 8 to 9 All Students 62 62 64 +2 English Language Learners 26 26 29 +3 Students with Disabilities 29 32 31 +2 Asian 81 78 82 +1 Black 45 47 47 +2 Hispanic 52 52 54 +2 Native American/Alaskan 65 64 63-2 White 77 78 79 +2 Multiracial 67 56-7 Biology 1 Percent Meets or Exceeds 9 8 7 5 3 1 62 62 64 26 26 29 29 32 31 81 82 78 45 47 47 52 52 54 65 64 63 77 78 79 67 56 Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 15

Historical Performance of Sub-Groups on the Georgia EOCT Physical Science Percent of Students Meeting and Exceeding Standard Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 Change from 8 to 9 All Students 63 64 67 +4 English Language Learners 38 42 43 +5 Students with Disabilities 34 37 37 +3 Asian 78 76 82 +4 Black 49 53 55 +6 Hispanic 57 58 64 +7 Native American/Alaskan 61 69 68 +7 White 78 76 81 +3 Multiracial 68 57 62-6 1 Physical Science Percent Meets or Exceeds 9 8 7 5 3 1 67 63 64 42 43 38 37 37 34 82 78 76 53 55 49 64 57 58 69 68 61 81 78 76 68 62 57 Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 16

Historical Performance of Sub-Groups on the Georgia EOCT U.S. History Percent of Students Meeting and Exceeding Standard Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 Change from 8 to 9 All Students 59 49 +1 English Language Learners 19 21 26 +7 Students with Disabilities 29 27 29 No Change Asian 76 61 78 +2 Black 41 33 43 +2 Hispanic 49 44 5 +1 Native American/Alaskan 69 64-9 White 74 64 74 No Change Multiracial 62 44 59-3 1 U.S. History 9 Percent Meets or Exceeds 8 7 5 3 1 59 49 26 19 21 29 27 29 76 61 78 41 33 43 49 5 44 74 74 69 64 64 62 44 59 Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 17

Historical Performance of Sub-Groups on the Georgia EOCT Economics Percent of Students Meeting and Exceeding Standard Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 Change from 8 to 9 All Students 68 7 68 No Change English Language Learners 38 35 39 +1 Students with Disabilities 36 41 36 No Change Asian 83 83 83 No Change Black 5 56 52 +2 Hispanic 63 61 61-2 Native American/Alaskan 71 74 72 +1 White 82 82 81-1 Multiracial 7 66 65-5 1 Economics Percent Meets or Exceeds 9 8 7 5 3 1 68 7 68 38 39 35 41 36 36 83 83 83 56 5 52 63 61 61 74 71 72 82 82 81 7 66 65 Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 18

Historical Performance of Sub-Groups on the Georgia EOCT Algebra I Percent of Students Meeting and Exceeding Standard Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 Change from 8 to 9 All Students 55-15 English Language Learners 47 31 31-16 Students with Disabilities 28 22-6 Asian 78 55 58 - Black 41 32 31-1 Hispanic 56 39-17 Native American/Alaskan 57 46 33-24 White 69 52 49 - Multiracial 38 38-22 1 Algebra I Percent Meets or Exceeds 9 8 7 5 3 1 55 47 31 31 28 22 78 58 55 41 32 31 56 57 46 39 33 69 52 49 38 38 Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 19

Historical Performance of Sub-Groups on the Georgia EOCT Geometry Percent of Students Meeting and Exceeding Standard Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 Change from 8 to 9 All Students 61 51 47-14 English Language Learners 47 36 37-1 Students with Disabilities 3 26 22-8 Asian 83 71 68-15 Black 41 34 3-11 Hispanic 56 47 45-11 Native American/Alaskan 69 61 53-16 White 79 67 66-13 Multiracial 65 44-21 1 Geometry Percent Meets or Exceeds 9 8 7 5 3 1 61 51 47 47 36 37 3 26 22 83 71 68 41 34 3 56 47 45 69 61 53 79 67 66 65 44 Spring 8 Winter 8 Spring 9 -

Number of Tests Administered Spring 9* Total Number Electronic 9 th Literature 99,844 23,568 American Literature 82,898 21,578 Algebra I 26,152 5,286 Geometry 64,231 1,83 U.S. History 86,251 24,545 Economics 49,293 18,835 Physical Science 53,65 7,559 Biology 113,682 28,225 TOTAL 575,416 139,679 * Figures include February and March online mid-month administrations Winter 8* Total Number Electronic 9 th Literature & Comp. 3,682 5,228 American Literature 27,72 6,22 Algebra I 34,936 7,64 Geometry 23,569 3,525 U.S. History 25,625 6,157 Economics 49,149 18,3 Physical Science 14,914 3,729 Biology,38 3,83 TOTAL 226,957 53,868 * Figures include August, September, October, and November online mid-month administrations Spring 9 Mid-Month Electronic February 9 March 9 Mid-Month Totals 9 th Literature & Comp 398 36 74 American Literature 427 332 759 Algebra I 345 319 664 Geometry 279 221 5 U.S. History 363 276 639 Economics 521 2,962 3,483 Physical Science 384 34 688 Biology 384 288 672 Totals 3,11 5,8 8,19 21