Our mission is to ensure that all students are successful learners. Adopted: November 5, 2007 Revised: November 9, 2009

Similar documents
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

Cuero Independent School District

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

KDE Comprehensive School. Improvement Plan. Harlan High School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

School Leadership Rubrics

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Robert Bennis Elementary School

Trends & Issues Report

Transportation Equity Analysis

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Collegiate Academies Response to Livingston School Facility RFA Submitted January 23, 2015

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Hokulani Elementary School

School Data Profile/Analysis

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

The School Report Express. FYI Picayune

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

THE CLASS OF Congratulations!

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

State Parental Involvement Plan

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

Mark Keppel High School

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Mooresville Charter Academy

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Geographic Area - Englewood

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

Academic Advising and Career Exploration. PLTW State Conference 2015 Bayless School District

CURRENT POSITION: Angelo State University, San Angelo, Texas

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

DAS-REMI District Accountability System Reporting, Evaluating, and Monitoring Instrument for the P2E2020SBP

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Wisconsin Youth Apprenticeship. Historical Overview

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Kannapolis Charter Academy

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Denver Public Schools

Strategic Improvement Plan

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

ASCD Recommendations for the Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind

PEIMS Submission 1 list

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Wright Middle School Charter For Board and District review Final Draft, May 2001

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Executive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School

DELAWARE CHARTER SCHOOL ANNUAL REPORT

The Impacts of Regular Upward Bound on Postsecondary Outcomes 7-9 Years After Scheduled High School Graduation

TSI Operational Plan for Serving Lower Skilled Learners

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

4 Subgroup scores. 1 Index scores and Trend SPS indictors

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Pyramid. of Interventions

Cooking Matters at the Store Evaluation: Executive Summary

Volunteer State Community College Budget and Planning Priorities

African American Male Achievement Update

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Seventh Grade Course Catalog

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. Education Leadership Program Course Syllabus

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Transcription:

Our mission is to ensure that all students are successful learners 2008 2013 Adopted: November 5, 2007 Revised: November 9, 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS AURORA R-VIII SCHOOLS MISSION STATEMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 AURORA R-VIII SCHOOLS BELIEF STATEMENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANNING PROCESS------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN COMMITTEE ---------------------------------------------------------- 3 ANALYSIS OF INTERNAL/EXTERNAL FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 AURORA R-VIII STRENGTHS AND CHALLENGES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 CSIP GOALS AND STRATEGIES: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT GOAL #1: All district students will consistently exceed Missouri averages in all subjects, grade levels, and student sub-groups on the Annual Performance Report. Strategy A: The district will utilize results of standardized tests and common assessments to improve instruction and provide additional support for all learners. --------------------------------- 7 Strategy B: The district will develop and implement a high level of instructional expectations for staff and students. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 FINANCIAL PLANNING GOAL #2: Maintain a sound fiscal plan for the long-term financial stability of the district budget. Strategy A: The district will develop and implement a formal financial plan for program changes to reduce costs and minimize the impact on the educational programs. ------------------------------ 9 FACILITIES PLANNING GOAL #3: The district will maintain and establish state-of-the-art facilities and technology. Strategy A: The district will develop and implement a 3-5 year facility and technology plan addressing the facility and technology needs of the district. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 IMPLEMENTING, MONITORING AND EVALUATION ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 11

AURORA R-VIII SCHOOLS MISSION STATEMENT Our mission is to ensure that all students are successful learners. AURORA R-VIII SCHOOLS BELIEF STATEMENTS The community of Aurora R-VIII School District believes that: All children can learn. Schools must provide opportunities for success. Everyone deserves respect and everyone shows respect. The school district promotes a sense of community. Everyone has individual value. s are the most integral part of their children s education. All people should recognize the importance in high moral and ethical standards. The decision-making process should involve the stakeholders. The community must value education. Description of the Planning Process This Comprehensive School Improvement Plan (CSIP) addresses concerns from meetings with parents, staff, patrons and students as well as data gathered from many sources by noting strategies that will help the district meet the needs of all students. The Comprehensive School Improvement Committee meets annually to discuss the district s strengths and areas of concern. The Committee monitors progress for each of the goals, analyzing the available data and making recommendations for improvement. The CSIP is presented to the Board of Education annually for review and approval. 2

2007 Comprehensive School Improvement Plan Committee* Member Rebecca Jung Chad Kessinger Krisha Kessinger Jeramie Grosenbacher Noelle Harmon Tammy Wallace Tony D Andrea Jay Lewis Dr. Dale Slagle Lucy Lyon Brenda Lakin Tiffany Means Carolyn Swartz Eric Seifried Dan Decker Kim Mobley Jill Garoutte Bill Kirby Christi Thomas Ben Abramovitz Paula Seal Emily Neyer Sandra Thrasher Katie Speight Teresa Murphy Representing Community Member Superintendent Assistant Superintendent Special Services Director Board Member Board Member Board Member High School Principal High School Teacher High School Teacher Junior High Principal Junior High Teacher Robinson Intermediate Principal Robinson Elementary Principal Robinson Elementary Teacher Pate Early Childhood Principal Pate Early Childhood Teacher K-12 English Language Learners *2009 Committee: Debbie Keener, parent; Jeramie Grosenbacher, parent; Paula Johnson, parent; Gayle Heath, parent; Ann Meyer, parent; Delia Cunningham, parent; Carolyn Swartz, Board member; Debbie Brechbuhler, teacher; Sandra Thrasher, Pate Principal; Sherri Lewis, teacher; David Miller, HS Principal; Don Wright, IT Tech; Karla Shiveley, 3

teacher; Gary Crim, teacher; Christi Thomas, teacher; Julie Chappell, teacher; Lucy Lyon, Assistant Superintendent; Brenda Lakin, Special Services Director; Dan Decker, Superintendent Internal Analysis Sources of internal assessment data Analysis of Internal/External Factors District Evaluation of programs Staff Surveys Achievement assessment results Disaggregated MAP scores Dropout data Persistence to graduation data Attendance data Professional Development Plan Career Ladder Plan Title I School Wide Plan Consolidated Federal Grants Application Safe and Drug Free Schools Survey results External Analysis Sources of external assessment data MSIP Review report Demographic data Technology surveys State and Federal requirements District Annual Performance Report District Special Education Annual Performance Report 4

Aurora R-VIII Strengths and Challenges Strengths: Challenges: 1. Qualified and dedicated staff 2. Commitment to providing quality education 3. Large offering of credits at the high school and exploratory classes for 7 th -8 th grades 4. Strong benefit package for employees 5. Wide variety of extracurricular and co-curricular activities 6. Comprehensive Special Education program that is highly integrated with regular education 7. School district has strong support of the community 8. Commitment to providing a safe environment 9. Up-to-date transportation system 10. Effective s as Teachers program 11. Strong commitment to long term building program 12. District wide parent-teacher communication 13. Wide variety of vocational offerings 14. Special Education forms and etc. web-based to reduce paper work and increase efficiency 15. Articulation agreement with Ozark Technical College to provide options for college bound students 16. Opportunity to access dual credit 17. Large number of vocational students are placed or are continuing education 18. Commitment to continue low staff to student ratio 19. Review of district s CSIP 1. At risk children 2. Persistence to graduation especially in special education 3. Academic achievement in MAP areas especially subgroups of ELL and special education 4. Drop out rate especially in special education 5. Influx of transient, low income or non-english speaking students 6. Handicap accessibility at the Central Office classrooms 7. Adequate facility space for physical education at Robinson Elementary and Intermediate 5

Great strides have been made over the past ten years in the following areas: 1. Professional development provided the staff with help to integrate differentiated instructional strategies into their instruction. 2. District provided training for new teachers and others in Step Up to Writing. 3. Attendance at summer school was recommended for students reading more than one grade level below grade placement. 4. The district attempted to ensure that the DESE state standards for teacher/student ratio were followed. 5. The district continued to research scientific based interventions for students reading below grade level (i.e. looping, Reading Recovery, etc.). 6. The district has implemented a district-operated preschool program. 7. The district utilizes the Southwest Area Career Center to meet the needs of all students. 8. At each attendance center, transitional activities have been planned for new students. 9. At each attendance center, transitional activities were provided between grade levels and buildings. 10. Eighth graders have completed a proposed high school course plan by the end of each year. 11. The district and attendance centers publicized the importance of good attendance. 12. All buildings focused on positive building climates and incentive programs to maintain a high level of attendance (i.e. test exemptions on finals, academic achievement awards, etc.). 13. The effectiveness of incentive programs was reviewed quarterly with revisions as needed. 14. Curriculum aligned to Missouri Standards 15. Focused professional development to meet the needs of the staff 6

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Goal # 1: All district students will consistently exceed Missouri averages in all subjects, grade levels, and student sub-groups on the Annual Performance Report. Measurable Objective: District students (including NCLB designated sub-groups of economically disadvantaged, major racial and ethnic groups, students with disabilities, and ELL students) will exceed Missouri averages in all subjects, grade levels, and student subgroups on the Annual Performance Report (MAP, End-of-course exams, ACT, Advance Course Enrollment, Career Education Course Enrollment, College Placement, Graduation Rate, and Attendance Rate). How Objective will be measured: Annual Performance Report results will be analyzed. Strategy: A) The district will utilize results of standardized tests and common assessments to improve instruction and provide additional support for all learners. Standard/ Indicator Action Number Action to be Taken 6.2.2, 1 Require and monitor progress on the development of 6.2, power standards/essential skills, pacing guides, and, 6.7.2 at a minimum, 4 common assessments for each 7.1.2 subject area and grade level. 6.2.6 2 Fully implement a comprehensive intervention system to improve the performance of students who are struggling 6.2.6 3 Research best practices, recommend, and implement opportunities for accelerated curriculum for students Person Responsible Asst. Supt. Staff Supt. Asst. Supt Staff Start Date Date Completed Funding Sources 11/08 05/10 PD funds District funds Title Funds 1/09 05/10 District funds PD Funds Federal Funds 1/10 08/10 District funds PDC funds 7

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Strategy: B) The district will develop and implement a high level of instructional expectations for staff and students. Standard/ Indicator Action Number Action to be Taken 6.2.3, 6.3 1 Implement program changes for the English language learners 6.2.3, 6.3, 7.1 6.2.4, 6.3.4 2 Implement program changes for the special education students 3 Research, recommend, and implement program changes targeting potential drop-outs with an emphasis on appropriate and timely intervention 6.3.3, 6.5 4 Research, recommend, and implement alternative programming and scheduling to meet the needs of all students (accelerated curriculum/basic curriculum) Person Responsible Asst. Supt ELL teacher Asst. Supt. Spec. Ed. Director Staff Staff Asst. Supt. Teachers Start Date Date Completed Funding Sources 1/10 5/10 District Funds Federal funds 1/10 5/10 District funds PD funds Federal funds 1/10 08/10 District funds Federal funds 1/10 08/10 District funds IDEA funds PD funds 8

FINANCIAL PLANNING Goal # 2: Maintain a sound fiscal plan for the long-term financial stability of the district budget. Measurable Objective: The district will develop a budget plan to address rising costs and future priorities. How Objective will be measured: Establish a 3-year budget plan. Strategy: A) The district will develop and implement a formal financial plan for program changes to reduce costs and minimize the impact on the educational programs. Standard/ Indicator Action Number Action to be Taken 8.5, 8.6 1 The district will establish a comprehensive 3- year district-wide financial plan that will include program changes to reduce costs while maintaining a highly qualified staff and providing a solid education for all students. Person Responsible Bd. of Ed. Supt. Start Date Funding Date Completed Sources 1/10 05/10 District funds 9

FACILITIES PLANNING Goal # 3: The district will establish and maintain state-of-the-art facilities and technology. Measurable Objective: A 5-year plan will be developed and implemented on long- and short-range facility and technology priorities for the district. How Objective will be measured: The district will establish the priorities and monitor the progress of long- and short-range facility and technology needs. Strategy: A) The district will develop and implement a 3-5 year facility and technology plan addressing the facility and technology needs of the district. Standard/ Indicator Action Number Action to be Taken Person Responsible Start Date Date Completed Funding Sources 8.9.1 1 Generate a long-range technology plan to identify short- and long-term technology priorities for the district for the next 5 years. Supt Tech Director 1/10 05/10 District funds 6.7, 6.4 2 Integrate and implement technology into the curriculum at all levels. 8.10, 8.11 3 Revise Facility Plan to include potential projects for the next five years with cost projections. Asst. Supt. Staff Asst. Supt. Staff 1/10 08/10 District Funds Federal funds 1/10 08/10 District Funds Federal funds 10

Implementing, Monitoring and Evaluation The Aurora R-VIII Board of Education implemented the original Comprehensive School Improvement Plan following approval on November 5, 2008. An annual review and revision of the CSIP is the responsibility of the CSIP committee as listed in this document. The review will occur in the fall of each year. During the review, the committee will examine information related to accomplishment of the goals and strategies outlined in the CSIP. In addition to reports from district administrators, questionnaires and surveys will be utilized to obtain input. Groups surveyed could include parents, students, teachers, community members and business leaders. Any needed revisions will be recommended by the committee. A revised CSIP will be presented to the Board of Education for their approval each year. 11