These regulations make no distinction for assessment purposes between students on different modes of attendance.
|
|
- Darlene Bradley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 These Regulations govern assessments for students who are commencing or who have moved at the beginning of 2009/2010 to an undergraduate programme which has modules with 15 credits or a multiple of 15 credits. There are a few programmes in the University which moved to a 15 credit structure in 2008/2009. Students taking these programmes will also be subject to these Regulations. Standard Undergraduate Assessment Regulations Version 4 J 1 J 1.1 J 1.2 J 1.3 J 1.3 J 1.4 Introduction These regulations are standard assessment regulations for programmes of study leading to the awards of the University shown at J 2 below. All programmes of study which lead to those awards are governed by these assessment regulations, except where Senate has agreed that a particular programme of study may be exempt from all or part of these requirements. Where such an exemption has been granted alternative assessment regulations will be published in the Student Course Handbook. Where deviation from these regulations is necessary in order to satisfy professional requirements, for example those of a Professional, Statutory or Regulatory Body, the relevant Student Course Handbook will provide details of the alternative regulation(s). These regulations make no distinction for assessment purposes between students on different modes of attendance. These regulations only apply to assessments conducted for the purposes of establishing credit, determining the right to progress or determining an award. Where indicated, students should refer to the appropriate Student Course Handbook for further details of the assessment requirements for their programme of study. J 2 J 2.1 Maximum Registration Periods For each award of the University there is a limit on the period for which a student may be registered for that award, as listed below. Where a student is admitted to a programme of study with exemption or with academic credit the maximum registration period for that student will be shortened. In such cases the maximum registration period will be calculated by deducting the maximum time permitted to reach the point at which the student is to be admitted from the normal maximum registration period for the award. Award Foundation Certificate Certificate in Professional Studies Maximum Period 3 years 2 years July
2 Certificate of Higher Education (Cert HE) Diploma in Professional Studies Foundation Degree Diploma of Higher Education (Dip HE) Advanced Diploma in Professional Studies Top-up Degree Bachelor s Degree Bachelor s Degree with Honours requiring 360 credits Bachelor s Degree with Honours requiring 480 credits Graduate Certificate (Grad Cert) Graduate Diploma (Grad Dip) 3 years 2 years 5 years 5 years 2 years 3 years 7 years 7 years 9 years 2 years 3 years In order to comply with the requirements of a professional or statutory body the Student Course Handbook may specify a shorter maximum registration period for a particular programme of study. J 2.2 J 2.3 J 3 J 3.1 There is no minimum registration period for any of the awards governed by these regulations. Where a student has formally interrupted his or her studies, the period of interruption of study will be included in the student s registration period for the purposes of calculating his or her maximum period of registration under these regulations. In order to record a formal interruption of studies the student must complete and return to the Faculty Office a Student Changes E3 Form (see also E2.17.3). Expiry of Maximum Registration Period All students should aim to complete their programme of study within the maximum registration period. It is acknowledged, however, that there will be students who do not complete within that timeframe. A student whose maximum registration period for the award has expired may request to proceed on the programme of study on which he or she has been registered. Such a student cannot proceed without some re-assessment of the currency of his or her previous learning. Such re-assessment may result in no, part, or full academic credit being granted for the student's previous July
3 study on the programme concerned. The assessment of students for academic credit is the responsibility of the Examination Board but, in the case of part-time students only, responsibility for a decision to allow a student to proceed with full academic credit may be delegated to the Course Director. Where full academic credit has been granted the student may proceed on the programme of study. Where full academic credit is not granted the student may not proceed on the programme until full academic credit has been obtained, usually by undertaking further study at the same or a lower level of attainment to that reached previously. The decision on whether to readmit a student to an earlier stage of the same programme on which he or she was previously enrolled in order to obtain the missing credit is a matter for the Board of Studies or those nominated to act on its behalf. J 3.2 The University cannot extend a maximum registration period which is specified by a professional or statutory body for a particular programme of study. J 4 J 4.1 J 4.2 J 4.3 J 4.4 J 4.5 J 4.6 J 4.7 Modules All undergraduate programmes of study consist of a series of modules. A module is a discrete block of study with its own objectives, syllabus, learning outcomes and assessment requirements. The modules which form a programme of study are described in the Student Course Handbook. Each module is assigned a credit value and level within an individual programme. More information about the credit rating and level of modules is given in J 5 and J 6 below. Modules must be classified as core or optional within a particular programme. The Student Course Handbook will define whether modules are core or optional in a particular programme of study. All core modules within a student s programme of study are compulsory. Programme teams may specify modules within a programme which are essential to the integrity of one or more of the awards governed by these regulations. These essential modules must be completed successfully in order to satisfy the requirements for that award and therefore they cannot be compensated. Such modules will be identified in the Student Course Handbook. An optional module is one selected by a student from a set of modules specified in the Student Course Handbook. The number of optional modules a student must successfully complete in order to qualify for the award is also specified in the Student Course Handbook. Where appropriate an optional module may be specified as a pre-requisite module for another optional module provided it satisfies the criteria set out in J 3.6 below. A pre-requisite module is one which must have been successfully completed before a module or modules for which it is specified as a pre-requisite can be studied in a subsequent level. A module is defined as a pre-requisite because it is essential for students to complete it successfully as preparation for study of the subsequent module; therefore, a module cannot be designated a pre-requisite for a later module July
4 to which its subject content is not linked directly. Where a programme contains prerequisite modules they are identified in the Student Course Handbook. J 4.7 J 4.8 A co-requisite module is one which must be taken in conjunction with another specified module during the same semester. Co-requisite modules are identified in the Student Course Handbook. The Student Course Handbook may also specify excluded combinations of modules. Excluded combinations are modules which may not be taken as part of the same programme of study. J 5 J 5.1 J 5.2 J 5.3 J 5.4 J 5.5 J 5.6 The Credit Framework All programmes of study which lead to the awards governed by these regulations are credit rated. Awards are obtained by accumulating a specified number of these credits (see J 8.1 below). Credits are awarded in accordance with the University s framework for credit accumulation and transfer which accords with the systems used by many other British universities and can be easily translated to the systems used by European universities. Each module has a credit rating. A standard size module has 15 credits which represents 150 notional learning hours. Individual students may take more or less time to achieve the outcomes of a particular module, thus this figure is merely indicative. A programme of study may contain double modules (30 credits) or triple modules (45 credits) etc and, exceptionally, when a programme is approved the inclusion of modules with a lower credit rating may be agreed where that is appropriate to the particular aims and learning outcomes. Details of the credit rating of each module within a programme are given in the Student Course Handbook. In order to be awarded the credits associated with a module a student must successfully complete the assessment associated with that module, satisfying the requirements for a pass mark set out at J 9 below. Where failure in a module has been compensated, the credits associated with the compensated module will be added to the credits achieved by the student for the purposes of calculating eligibility for an award (see J 16 below). Some undergraduate programmes of study include work-based learning which is assessed and has a credit rating. Details of any work-based learning are given in the Student Course Handbook which will also explain the assessment process and the amount of credit allocated to these modules. If a student has been granted academic credit through APL these credits count towards the total number of credits required for the award. The regulations governing the granting of academic credit are set out in Section D above. July
5 J 6 J 6.1 Levels Modules are also assigned a level within each programme of study. The level represents the position of the module in the curriculum in terms of the sophistication of the knowledge, understanding and skills that a student is required to demonstrate to achieve the learning outcomes. Modules which contribute to the awards governed by these regulations are designated levels as set out in the descriptor for each award in Section B of Part 1. J 7 J 7.1 J 7.2 J 7.3 Module Assessment Modules are assessed by the methods and criteria described in the syllabus provided in the Student Course Handbook. A schedule of assessment will be published to students at the start of each module or combination of modules. The schedule will provide information about the nature and timing of assessment for the module or combination of modules. The following limits have been placed upon the number of assessments permitted per module: Modules with a credit rating of less than 15 shall include one item of assessment only; and Modules with a credit rating of 15 or more may include up to two items of assessment. The assessment method(s) for each item of assessment will be defined in the schedule of assessment. The method used to assess each item of assessment will vary according to the nature of the module and may include, for example, an examination (including open-book), presentation, coursework, log-book, project, laboratory test or clinical test etc. J 7.4 J 7.5 Senate may accept a recommendation from a panel established to consider the approval or review and re-approval of a programme of study to allow a module to include more assessments than would normally be possible under J 7.3 above. Such a proposal may also be approved through a Faculty s minor change processes. In these cases, the nature and size of the additional item(s) of assessment will be explained in the Student Course Handbook. The use of additional grading schemes to supplement the information provided to students about their assessed work is permitted. Where such a scheme is operated it will be described in the relevant Student Course Handbook. July
6 J 8 J 8.1 J Eligibility for awards Credit Requirements In order to satisfy the requirements for an award, students must have been awarded the credits shown in the table below. Where a student has been admitted with academic credit to an undergraduate programme the amount of credit required for an award will be reduced by the number of credits with which the student has been admitted. The regulations governing the admission of students with academic credit are given in Section D of Part 1 of the Academic Regulations and Policies. Award Minimum credit needed to satisfy the requirements of the award Foundation Certificate 120 credits at level 3; Certificate in Professional 60 credits at level 4 Studies 1 Level 3 credits cannot contribute to any other award governed by these regulations. Certificate of Higher Education 120 credits at level 4 or above 2 (Cert HE) 1 Diploma in Professional Studies 1 a minimum of 60 credits at level 5 Foundation Degree 1 Diploma of Higher Education (Dip HE) credits of which at least 120 must be at level credits of which at least 120 must be at level 5 or above 2 Advanced Diploma in Professional Studies 1 a minimum of 60 credits at level 6 Bachelor s Degree 1 Bachelor s Degree with Honours 300 credits of which at least 60 must be at level 6 and not more than 120 at level credits of which at least 120 must be at level 6 and not more than 120 at level 4 1 Available as an aegrotat award. Where, in order to comply with the requirements of a professional or accrediting body, an aegrotat award is not available for a particular programme of study this will be specified in the Student Handbook. 2 When an Examination Board is considering a student s results for an award, credits achieved for Level 5 or 6 modules may be counted towards the award of a Cert HE or a Dip HE provided the student has met the requirements for that award. July
7 Graduate Certificate (Grad 60 credits at Level 6 Cert) 1 Graduate Diploma (Grad Dip) credits at Level 6 Certain programmes of study which lead to the award of Bachelor s Degree with Honours require 480 credits of which at least 240 must be at level 6 and not more than 120 at level 4. The relevant Student Course Handbook will include details. J 8.2 J J J Joint Degrees and awards with a major or minor Some programmes of study leading to the award of Bachelor s degree with Honours permit students to undertake specified modules in order to gain a joint honours award. In order to qualify for a joint honours award the student s programme of study must have included modules equivalent to 60 credits in each of the joint subjects at levels 5 and 6. Some undergraduate programmes of study permit students to undertake specified modules in order to gain an award with a major or minor. To qualify for a major the student s programme of study must include modules in the major subject equivalent to at least 75 credits from level 5 or 6 for the award of Diploma of Higher Education, 105 credits at level 5 and 6 for the award of Bachelor s Degree or 135 credits from level 5 and 6 for a Bachelor s Degree with Honours. In order to qualify for a minor the student s main study must be combined with modules in the minor subject which are equivalent to at least 30 credits from level 5 or 6 for the award of Diploma of Higher Education, 60 credits from Level 5 and 6 for the award of Bachelor s Degree or 75 credits from Level 5 and 6 for the award of Bachelor s Degree with Honours. An award with a minor shall not be made where a student's profile includes modules in the minor subject that equal or exceed the credits required for a major or joint award. In such cases a joint award or an award with a major may be made if this is permitted under the regulations for the programme concerned. J Where a student joins an undergraduate programme partway through Level 5 or 6, major/minor awards should be calculated as follows: If the student joins the programme with 60 level 5 credits, the student s programme of study must include modules in the major subject equivalent to at least 90 credits from level 5 and 6 for the award of Bachelor s Degree with honours. In order to qualify for a minor the student s main study must be combined with modules in the minor subject which are equivalent to at least 45 credits at Level 5 or 6 (see also J17.8 below).; If a student joins the programme at the start of Level 6, the programme of study must include modules in the major subject equivalent to at least 75 level July
8 6 credits for the award of Bachelor s Degree with Honours. In order to qualify for a minor the student s main study must be combined with modules in the minor subject which are equivalent to at least 30 credits at level 6 for the award of Bachelor s Degree with Honours (see also J17.9 below). An award with a minor shall not be made where a student's profile includes modules in the minor subject that equal or exceed the credits required for a major or joint award. In such cases a joint award or an award with a major may be made if this is permitted under the regulations for the programme concerned. J The following awards are available with major and minor awards: Diploma of Higher Education Foundation Degree Bachelor s Degree Bachelor s Degree with Honours J 9 J 9.1 J Marks Marks for items of assessment Marks assigned by examiners for each item of assessment are expressed as a percentage and in whole numbers. J 9.2 Pass mark for a module J The pass mark for a module with one item of assessment is 40%. J In modules which have more than one item of assessment a pass will be awarded where: the overall average of the marks achieved for the items of assessment is 40% or more; and the mark in each separate item of assessment is not less than 30%. In calculating the overall average mark for a module the marks attributed to each item of assessment will be weighted equally unless a different weighting has been specified in the Student Course Handbook J J Where the process of calculating the overall weighted average mark for a module results in a mark which is not a whole number, that mark will be expressed to one decimal place except where the overall weighted average expressed to one decimal place is between 39.5% and 39.9%. In these cases the overall average mark will be rounded up. Where a different pass mark is required in order to meet requirements of a professional body this will be specified in the Student Course Handbook. July
9 J If it is agreed at the point of programme approval or via a Faculty s minor change procedures that a module is to be marked on a pass/fail basis this will be specified in the Student Course Handbook. J 10 J 10.1 J 10.2 Notification of Marks to Students Marks will remain provisional until they have been confirmed by the relevant Examination Board. A final transcript which accords with the University s standard template for the transcript of learning and achievement will be issued when an award is confirmed. J 11 J 11.1 J 11.2 J 11.3 J 11.4 J 11.5 Late Coursework It is the responsibility of students to submit work for assessment as required. Information about the nature and timing of assessment will be published to students in accordance with J 7.1 and J 7.2 above. The Student Course Handbook will also define those items of assessment which are classified as coursework. Where a student submits his or her first attempt at an assessment after the published deadline the maximum mark available will be 40% provided it is submitted no more than 5 working days after the published deadline. Work submitted more than 5 working days after the published deadline will not be marked and the student will be deemed to have failed an attempt at the assessment. Where a student submits a re-assessment attempt after the published deadline the student will be deemed to have failed the re-assessment and the coursework will be returned to the student unmarked. A student who is unable to meet a coursework deadline because of exceptional circumstances may request either an extension to the coursework deadline or to defer the assessment (see J12). J 12 J 12.1 Claims to defer assessment or to request a coursework extension because of Exceptional Circumstances A student who is unable to attend an examination or other form of assessment or to meet a coursework deadline because of exceptional circumstances may make a request either to: defer the attempt at the assessment(s) to a later date; or be granted an extension to complete coursework. J 12.2 The regulations and procedures for requests to defer an assessment or to be granted an extension are described in Part II of the Academic Regulations and July
10 Policies. Guidance for students is also published in Part II which describes the type of circumstances that may be seen as exceptional and the nature of evidence that will be required to determine the validity of a request to defer an assessment or be granted an extension. J12.3 If a student with disabilities has a Support Statement recommending additional time to complete coursework, the student may be granted an alternative deadline in accordance with the policy and procedures set out in Part II. The granting of additional time to complete the coursework does not affect the student s right to submit a request for a deferral of assessment or an extension on the grounds of exceptional circumstances provided the student s request is based on exceptional circumstances which have not already been taken into account in the Support Statement. J 13 Progression J 13.1 Progression from Level 3 to Level 4 J In order to progress from level 3 to level 4 a student must have been awarded 120 credits at level 3. J 13.2 Progression from Level 4 upwards J In order to progress to the next level a student must have successfully completed modules worth 90 credits or more in the level. J Therefore, a student who has failed modules worth more than 30 credits in a level will not be permitted to progress to the next level until the requirements laid down in J above have been met. J A student who has satisfied the requirements set out in J above, may be permitted to study modules from different levels concurrently provided the limitations on module registration set down in J 14.1 are not exceeded. J A student will not be permitted to commence study of a module for which he or she has not already completed successfully a module identified as a pre-requisite for that module. J 14 Provisions in the Event of Failure Flowcharts summarising the re-assessment process defined in Regulations J 14.1 to J 14.5 can be found in Annex 1 below. J 14.1 General Provisions J A student who has failed a module or modules may be registered for assessment in modules equivalent to a maximum of 150 credits in any one year in order to retrieve the failed module(s). The student will be required to re-register for assessment in the failed module or modules before being permitted to register for new modules. Thus, where a student is to re-study a module concurrently with new modules and July
11 there is a timetable clash between the module to be re-studied and a new module it is the module being re-studied in which the student will be registered. J The maximum mark which can be awarded for a module after re-assessment is 40% irrespective of the academic merits of the re-assessed work. This mark will be used for the purposes of determining the differentiation or classification of an award. J Where a decision has been taken to cease to offer a module, the Faculty will schedule three re-assessment opportunities for the final cohort, which will include a requirement to re-study the module for those students who fail at referral (see J 14.3). Students will be eligible to submit claims to defer an assessment or claim a coursework extension because of exceptional circumstances in respect of each attempt at assessment in such a module (see Procedures for the Procedures for the Consideration of Exceptional Circumstances in Part II). Students will be offered the choice of registering for a replacement module, rather than repeating the module which is being phased out. Any attempt at this alternative module will be regarded as a re-assessment. The maximum mark which can be awarded after reassessment in the replacement module is 40% irrespective of the academic merits of the re-assessed work. This mark will be used for the purposes of determining the differentiation or classification of an award. J A student cannot demand re-assessment or the right to re-study to retrieve failure in a module which is no longer current in the programme. The Examination Board will make such special arrangements as it deems appropriate in cases where it is not practicable for students to be re-assessed in the same module and by the same methods as before. J A student will not be permitted to repeat the assessment for an item of assessment, module or modules he or she has already completed successfully in order to improve the mark. J Where a student has failed an optional module or modules he or she will be permitted to substitute alternative optional modules, provided such modules are available. The actual mark achieved for the assessment of the new module will be used for the purposes of calculating the differentiation or classification of an award. Failed substitute modules cannot subsequently be substituted (see Flowchart 2 at Annex 1 below). J 14.2 Referral J A student who fails a module or modules at the first attempt will be referred in the item(s) of assessment he or she has failed. The re-assessment will take place on the next occasion the module is assessed. J Where a module includes more than one item of assessment a student will not be required to be referred in an item he or she has passed. The mark achieved in the passed item will be used along with the mark achieved after re-assessment of the failed item to calculate the overall weighted average mark for the module. The mark achieved in a re-assessed item of assessment must be 30% or more and must be sufficient to raise the overall weighted average mark for the module to July
12 40%. Where a student has failed more than one item of assessment in a module he or she will be registered automatically for re-assessment in the failed items of assessment. If the mark achieved after re-assessment in an item of assessment is lower than that achieved at the previous attempt, the higher mark achieved will be used to calculate the overall weighted average mark for the module. J 14.3 Re-studying modules J Where a student at the referral attempt either: fails the module(s); or fails either to attend the examination/assessment task or to submit coursework in which he or she was referred he or she will be required to register automatically to re-study the module(s). The Learning Agreement will define how the student will re-study to recoup failure (see J 14.5) J The student will be required to complete all of the items of assessment in the module. Assessment marks from a previous attempt cannot be carried forward. J 14.4 Re-assessment after re-studying J Where a student after re-studying a module either: fails the module(s); or fails either to attend the examination/assessment task or to submit re-assessment coursework he or she will be referred for one final attempt at re-assessment in the module on the next occasion the module is assessed. J Where a module includes more than one item of assessment a student will not be required to be referred in an item he or she has passed after re-study. The mark achieved in the passed item will be used along with the mark achieved after reassessment of the failed item to calculate the overall weighted average mark for the module. The mark achieved in a re-assessed item of assessment must be 30% or more and must be sufficient to raise the overall weighted average mark for the module to 40%. Where a student has failed more than one item of assessment in a module after re-study he or she will be registered automatically for re-assessment in the failed items of assessment. If the mark achieved after re-assessment in an item of assessment is lower than that achieved at the second re-assessment attempt (i.e. after re-study), the higher mark achieved will be used to calculate the overall weighted average mark for the module. July
13 J 14.5 Learning Agreements J If a student has failed a module or modules a written agreement with the student, called a Learning Agreement, will be drawn up. The Learning Agreement will specify: the module(s) the student has failed and needs to retrieve; whether the student is required to re-study the module; where a student is to re-study a module or modules, the number of new modules which the student will study concurrently; the support the student will receive in retrieving the failed module; and the date(s) at which a student will be required to be re-assessed. J If, after the next assessment attempt, the student still has a failed module or modules to retrieve a new Learning Agreement will be agreed with the student. J If the student fails either to attend the examination/assessment task or to submit reassessment coursework by the date(s) agreed he or she will be deemed to have failed that opportunity for re-assessment unless a claim to defer the assessment has been upheld. J 15 J 15.1 J 15.2 Withdrawal from the programme Where a student withdraws before completing his or her programme, the student will be entitled to receive an interim award provided that the requirements for that award have already been met. Where an interim award is not available this will be specified in the Student Course Handbook. A student who fails again after exhausting the right to re-assessment afforded under J 14 above will be given the opportunity either: to accept the conferment of the highest level of interim award for which he or she has satisfied the requirements, in which case the student will be withdrawn from the programme; or to transfer his or her registration to an appropriate alternative programme for which he or she can still satisfy the requirements, where such a programme is available. J 15.3 An Examination Board may withdraw a student who has been required to re-study and who, despite warnings, has failed to meet the requirements to attend/engage in the module as set out in the Learning Agreement. If the student has already satisfied the requirements for an interim award he or she will be given the opportunity to accept that award. July
14 J 15.4 A student who fails to satisfy the assessment requirements for his or her programme within the maximum permitted registration period for the award will be withdrawn from the programme (see J 3 above). J 16 J 16.1 J 16.2 J 16.3 J 16.4 Compensation Compensation is the process by which an Examination Board, in consideration of a student s overall performance, recommends that credit be awarded for a module in which a student has failed to satisfy the assessment criteria. Compensation is only applied when the conditions in J 16.4 to J 16.6 below have been met. The compensation regulations will be invoked by the Examination Board when the student s results are considered at the end of each level and/or for an award. An Examination Board is not permitted to compensate failure in any module forming part of a programme of study that contributes to an award containing fewer than 120 credits. The maximum number of credits that may be compensated at the end of each level of each award is stated below. A student cannot be compensated in a module and referred for re-assessment/re-study in another module at the same level at the same meeting of the Examination Board. Thus, where a student has failed in modules exceeding the volumes of credit stated below no failed module will be compensated. Foundation Certificate Modules equivalent to a maximum of 30 credits may be compensated at the end of level 3. Certificate of Higher Education Modules equivalent to a maximum of 30 credits may be compensated at the end of level 4. Diploma of Higher Education and Foundation Degree Modules equivalent to a maximum of 30 credits may be compensated at the end of level 4. Modules equivalent to a maximum of 15 credits may be compensated at the end of level 5. Bachelor s Degree Modules equivalent to a maximum of 30 credits may be compensated at Level 4. July
15 Modules equivalent to a maximum of 15 credits may be compensated at Level 5 or 6. Compensation will not be permitted at Level 5 or 6 where a student has failed modules worth more than 15 credits within the level. Bachelor s Degree with Honours Modules equivalent to a maximum of 30 credits may be compensated at Level 4. Modules equivalent to a maximum of 15 credits may be compensated at the end of level 5. Modules equivalent to a maximum of 30 credits may be subject to compensation by the end of level 6. This total must include any level 5 modules that were compensated at the end of level 5. 3 Compensation will not be permitted at Level 6 where a student has failed modules equivalent to more than 30 credits over Levels 5 and 6. This total of failed modules must include any modules compensated at the end of Level 5. 4 Level 6 top-up degrees Modules equivalent to a maximum of 15 credits at level 6 may be compensated. Certificate in Professional Studies Diploma in Professional Studies Advanced Diploma in Professional Studies An Examination Board is not permitted to compensate failure in any module forming part of a programme of study that contributes to the award of Certificate in Professional Studies, Diploma in Professional Studies or Advanced Diploma in Professional Studies. 3 In programmes which lead to the award of Bachelor s degree with Honours and require 360 credits at Levels 5 and 6, a student may be compensated in modules equivalent to 15 credits when he or she has taken modules equivalent to 120 credits at Level 5; when a student has taken modules equivalent to 120 credits at Level 6 he or she may be compensated in modules equivalent to 15 credits; when a student has 240 credits at Level 6 he or she may be compensated in modules equivalent to 30 credits but this total must include any Level 6 credits already compensated. 4 In programmes which lead to the award of Bachelor s degree with Honours and require 360 credits at Level 5 and 6, compensation will not be permitted when a student has taken 240 credits at Level 6 and has failed modules equivalent to more than 30 credits over Level 6. This total of failed modules must include any modules compensated at the end of the first 120 credits at Level 6. July
16 Graduate Certificate An Examination Board is not permitted to compensate failure in any module forming part of a programme of study that contributes to the award of Graduate Certificate. Graduate Diploma Modules equivalent to a maximum of 15 credits at level 6 may be compensated. J 16.5 To be eligible for compensation a student must have achieved: an overall average mark of 45% or above in all of the modules that contribute to the level; 5 and an overall weighted average mark of 29.5% or above in the module for which compensation is being considered. J 16.6 J 16.7 J 16.8 J 16.9 Compensation will be applied to a module in which the student has been reassessed if the mark awarded after re-assessment is sufficient to meet the requirements laid down in J 16.5 above. The Student Course Handbook will identify modules in which failure cannot be compensated. Optional modules cannot be identified as ineligible for compensation except where the module concerned serves as a pre-requisite for another module in a particular student s programme. Modules in which failure has been compensated cannot be used as pre-requisites for subsequent modules. Where a student has elected to substitute an alternative optional module for an optional module that has been failed, the actual mark achieved in the assessment of the alternative module will be used to calculate the student s entitlement to compensation. J Where failure in a module has been compensated, the credits associated with the compensated module will be added to the credits achieved by the student for the purposes of determining progression or calculating eligibility for an award. J Where failure in a module has been compensated, the actual mark achieved by the student will be used for the purposes of calculating the differentiation or classification of the award. J At Levels 5 and 6, a student may decline to have failure in a module or modules compensated and may elect to be re-assessed instead with a view to improving the mark or marks awarded to 40% for the purposes of calculating the differentiation or 5 Where compensation is applied at Level 6 on a Bachelor s Degree or Bachelor s Degree with Honours programme a student must have achieved an overall average mark of 45% or above in all modules that contribute to Level 5 and Level 6 combined July
17 classification of the award. A student electing to be re-assessed must notify the Faculty in writing within three weeks of publication of the results. 6 Where a student fails again after such re-assessment, the mark(s) achieved in the re-assessment will be used to calculate the student s eligibility for compensation unless the mark(s) achieved after re-assessment is lower than that previously achieved in which case the higher mark will be used. J 17 The Classification of Honours Degrees J 17.1 For Bachelor s Degrees with Honours which require a student to be awarded 360 credits the classification of the award will be calculated as described below. Senate may accept a recommendation from a panel established to consider the approval or review and re-approval of a programme of study to allow a method of classification based solely on the overall average of Level 6 modules equivalent to 120 credits where this is more appropriate to the particular discipline. 7 J 17.2 J 17.3 The Examination Board will consider the overall average of the best Level 5 marks achieved in modules equivalent to 30 credits and the best Level 6 marks in modules equivalent to 90 credits. 8 In calculating the overall average mark, module marks will be weighted in proportion to their credit value. Marks to one decimal place will be totalled for the calculation and the overall average mark will be expressed as a whole number. In order to express the total percentage mark as a whole number fractions of.5 and above will be rounded up, anything below.5 will be rounded down. This total will determine the degree classification as shown in the following table: 6 The arrangements for providing notification will be published to students affected by this regulation. 7 In the case of awards of Bachelor s Degree with Honours that require students to be awarded 480 credits, the method agreed on behalf of the Senate to calculate the classification of honours awards will be recorded in the relevant Student Handbook. 8 For students who were awarded marks for Level 5 or Level 6 work on their programme before the start of 2009/10 the classification of the award will be calculated from whichever of the following two calculation methods produces the highest mark: Method 1 the overall average of the marks achieved for level 5 and level 6 modules equivalent to 240 credits. Where students have a mixture of 12 and 15 credits within a level the total number of credits achieved may amount to slightly more or less than 240 credits. An adjustment will be made to take this difference into account in the calculation. Method 2 the overall average of the marks achieved in level 6 modules equivalent to 90 credits. For the purposes of calculating the overall average mark the highest marks achieved by the student in level 6 modules equivalent to 90 credits will be used. In respect of non-standard size modules a single module equivalence will be calculated and used for the purposes of determining the student s overall average mark. Where students have a mixture of 12 and 15 credits within Level 6 an adjustment will be made to take this into account in the calculation. July
18 Honours Classification First Class Total percentage mark 70% or above Second Class Honours Division I % Second Class Honours Division II 50 59% Third Class 40 49% J 17.4 Where failure in a Level 5 or 6 module has been compensated (see J 15 above) the actual mark achieved by the student will be used to calculate the classification of the award. J 17.5 Where a student has been admitted with academic credit partway through level 5, the degree classification will be based solely upon the marks achieved in the modules the student is required to complete on the programme in order to qualify for the award and will be calculated in accordance with J 17.2 to J 17.3 above. J 17.6 J 17.7 Where a student has been admitted to a Level 6 top-up degree or admitted with academic credit to the start of Level 6 the classification of the award will be based solely upon the marks achieved in the modules the student is required to complete on the programme in order to qualify for the award. Where a student has undertaken approved study at an overseas institution as part of an exchange programme, the results achieved in the modules studied abroad will be excluded for the purposes of calculating the honours classification. Thus the calculation of the honours classification will be based upon the student s performance in all other Level 5 and 6 modules, calculated in accordance with J17.2 to J 17.3 above. J 18 J 18.1 J 18.2 Awards with Commendation or Distinction Certain awards include provision for the award to be conferred with Commendation or Distinction. The requirements which must be satisfied for an award with Commendation or Distinction are set out at J 18.3 to J 18.6 below. The following awards are available with Commendation or Distinction: Foundation Certificate Certificate of Higher Education Diploma of Higher Education Foundation Degree Bachelor s Degree Graduate Diploma July
19 J 18.3 J 18.4 J 18.5 J 18.6 An award with Commendation will be made to students who satisfy the requirements for the award and achieve an overall average mark of between 60% - 69% at the credit value and levels specified in the table below. An award with Distinction will be made to students who satisfy the requirements for the award and achieve an overall average mark of 70% or above at the credit value and levels specified in the table below. Where module marks are averaged for the purposes of determining eligibility for an award with Commendation or Distinction, marks to one decimal place will be totalled for the calculation but the overall average mark will be expressed as a whole number. In order to express the overall average mark as a whole number fractions of.5 and above will be rounded up, anything below.5 will be rounded down. Where a student has been admitted with academic credit the differentiation of the award will be based solely upon the marks achieved in the modules the student was required to complete on the programme in order to qualify for the award. Award Credit value used for calculating average Additional rule for particular award Foundation Certificate 120 credits at Level 3 Certificate of Higher Education 120 credits at Level 4 Diploma of Higher Education 120 credits at Level 5 and/or Level 6 Foundation Degree 120 credits at level 5 Where completed modules from Level 5 and Level 6 total more than 120 credits, the calculation will be based upon the marks achieved in the candidate s best modules equivalent to at least 120 credits. Bachelor s Degree requiring 300 credits Bachelor s Degree requiring 360 credits 180 credits at Level 5 and 6 Where completed modules at Level 5 and Level 6 total more than 180 credits, the calculation will be based upon the marks achieved in the candidate s best modules equivalent to at least 180 credits. The method agreed on behalf of the Senate to calculate the differentiation will be recorded in the relevant Student Handbook Graduate Diploma 120 credits at Level 6 July
20 J 19 Cheating The procedures to be followed in cases of alleged cheating are governed by the Student Disciplinary Procedure given in Part II. J 20 Representations by Students Against Academic Decisions The procedures to be followed for representations by students against academic decision where there has been a material irregularity in the conduct of the assessment or the Examination Board are described in Part II. July
21 MODULE ASSESSMENT (1 st attempt) Annex 1 to Section J Full mark obtained. Module passed and credit awarded. PASS Pass? FAIL Module failed. Student referred for re-sit. Learning Agreement agreed. (2 nd attempt) Mark Capped at 40%. Module passed and credit awarded. PASS Pass? FAIL Module failed. Student registered to re-study entire module. Learning Agreement reviewed. (1 st re-study attempt) PASS Pass? FAIL Re-studied module failed. Student has one final attempt to re-sit. Learning Agreement reviewed. PASS Pass? FAIL Final attempt at module failed. Withdraw or transfer to another programme. Flowchart 1: Quick Reference Flow Chart- For Re-Sit/Re- Study of Failed Core Modules July
22 OPTIONAL MODULE ASSESSMENT. (1 st Attempt) Flowchart 2: Quick Reference Flow Chart- For Re-Sit/ Re-Study Of Failed Optional Modules PASS Pass? FAIL Module failed. Re-sit or substitute with alternative optional module? SUBSTITUTE Commence study on new substituted module. (1 st attempt not capped) Student restarts as if for the first time* RE-SIT SUBSTITUTE Full mark obtained. Module passed and credit awarded. PASS Re-sit module (2 nd attempt). Learning Agreement agreed** Pass? FAIL Module failed. Re-study module or substitute with alternative optional module? RE-STUDY Re-study module. Learning Agreement reviewed (1 st re-study attempt) Pass? FAIL SUBSTITUTE Module failed. Re-sit module (final attempt) or substitute PASS RE-SIT Mark capped at 40%. Module passed and credit awarded. Re-sit module. Learning Agreement reviewed (Final attempt) PASS Pass? FAIL * Students may elect to substitute optional modules on ONE occasion only and only where alternative optional modules are available. See relevant Student Handbook for details of optional module availability. ** Where students fail a module Learning Agreements would be required to be agreed before re-commencing study. Withdraw; transfer to another programme where possible; or substitution permitted if not taken previously. July
University of Exeter College of Humanities. Assessment Procedures 2010/11
University of Exeter College of Humanities Assessment Procedures 2010/11 This document describes the conventions and procedures used to assess, progress and classify UG students within the College of Humanities.
More informationDegree Regulations and Programmes of Study Undergraduate Degree Programme Regulations 2017/18
Degree Regulations and Programmes of Study Undergraduate Degree Programme Regulations 2017/18 A General Undergraduate Degree Regulations Compliance 1 Compliance and concessions 2 Head of College authority
More informationGeneral rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014
General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014 Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1 General rules 2 1.2 Objective and scope 2 1.3 Organisation of the
More informationAnglia Ruskin University Assessment Offences
Introduction Anglia Ruskin University Assessment Offences 1. As an academic community, London School of Marketing recognises that the principles of truth, honesty and mutual respect are central to the
More informationMaster of Philosophy. 1 Rules. 2 Guidelines. 3 Definitions. 4 Academic standing
1 Rules 1.1 There shall be a degree which may be awarded an overall grade. The award of the grade shall be made for meritorious performance in the program, with greatest weight given to completion of the
More information22/07/10. Last amended. Date: 22 July Preamble
03-1 Please note that this document is a non-binding convenience translation. Only the German version of the document entitled "Studien- und Prüfungsordnung der Juristischen Fakultät der Universität Heidelberg
More informationvalue equivalent 6. Attendance Full-time Part-time Distance learning Mode of attendance 5 days pw n/a n/a
PROGRAMME APPROVAL FORM SECTION 1 THE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1. Programme title and designation Orthodontics 2. Final award Award Title Credit ECTS Any special criteria value equivalent MSc Orthodontics
More informationGeneral study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology
Date of adoption: 07/06/2017 Ref. no: 2017/3223-4.1.1.2 Faculty of Social Sciences Third-cycle education at Linnaeus University is regulated by the Swedish Higher Education Act and Higher Education Ordinance
More informationREGULATIONS RELATING TO ADMISSION, STUDIES AND EXAMINATION AT THE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOUTHEAST NORWAY
REGULATIONS RELATING TO ADMISSION, STUDIES AND EXAMINATION AT THE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOUTHEAST NORWAY Authorisation: Passed by the Joint Board at the University College of Southeast Norway on 18 December
More informationDEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE (HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING)
STATUTE ENG31 DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE (HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING) 1. For admission as a candidate for the degree of Master of Science (Human Factors Engineering), a person must: be a graduate of this
More informationProgramme Specification (Postgraduate) Date amended: 25 Feb 2016
Programme Specification (Postgraduate) Date amended: Feb 06. Programme Title(s): Sc and Postgraduate Diploma in Software Engineering for Financial Services, Sc Software Engineering for Financial Services
More informationPROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Foundation Degree in Ophthalmic Dispensing Award Foundation Degree School School of Health Sciences Department or equivalent Division of Optometry and Visual
More informationBachelor of International Hospitality Management, BA IHM. Course curriculum National and Institutional Part
Bachelor of International Hospitality Management, BA IHM Course curriculum 2016-2018 August 2016 0 INDHOLD 1. curriculum framework... 4 1.1. Objective of the study programme... 4 1.2. Title and duration...
More informationUndergraduate Degree Requirements Regulations
Undergraduate Degree Requirements Regulations LSU has the responsibility to protect its educational mission and the health and safety of its community and of the property therein, through regulating the
More informationTeaching and Examination Regulations Master s Degree Programme in Media Studies
Teaching and Examination Regulations 2016 Master s Degree Programme in Media Studies Erasmus School of History, Culture and Communication Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam Table of Contents Page Section 1
More informationAcademic Advising Manual
Academic Advising Manual Revised 17 July 2013 1 Academic Advising Manual Table of Contents I. Academic Advising Mission Statement. 3 II. Goals and Responsibilities of Advisors and Students 3-5 III. Characteristics
More informationEducation and Examination Regulations for the Bachelor's Degree Programmes
Education and Examination Regulations for the Bachelor's Degree Programmes Nijmegen School of Management 2012-2013 Business Administration Public Administration Economics and Business Economics Political
More informationContents I. General Section 1 Purpose of the examination and objective of the program Section 2 Academic degree Section 3
Examination Regulations for the Masters Degree Program in Applied Neurosciences in Sports & Exercise in the Faculty of Natural Sciences at Paderborn University of xx.xx.xxxx On the basis of Section 2 para.
More informationPUTRA BUSINESS SCHOOL (GRADUATE STUDIES RULES) NO. CONTENT PAGE. 1. Citation and Commencement 4 2. Definitions and Interpretations 4
1 PUTRA BUSINESS SCHOOL (GRADUATE STUDIES RULES) TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY NO. CONTENT PAGE 1. Citation and Commencement 4 2. Definitions and Interpretations 4 PART 2 STUDY PROGRAMMES 3. Types
More informationQUEEN ELIZABETH S SCHOOL
QUEEN ELIZABETH S SCHOOL Admissions Criteria and Information a Guide for Parents September 2017 Admissions Queen Elizabeth s School Queen s Road, Barnet, Hertfordshire, EN5 4DQ Telephone Number 020 8441
More informationSixth Form Admissions Procedure
University of Birmingham School Sixth Form Admissions Procedure September 2018 University of Birmingham School Sixth Form Admission Procedures Review Frequency Review date Governing Committee Approved
More informationGuidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications
Annex 1 APPROVED by the Management Board of the Estonian Research Council on 23 March 2016, Directive No. 1-1.4/16/63 Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications 1. Scope The guidelines
More informationUNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM CODE OF PRACTICE ON LEAVE OF ABSENCE PROCEDURE
UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM CODE OF PRACTICE ON LEAVE OF ABSENCE PROCEDURE 1 Index of points 1. Introduction 2. Definition of Leave of Absence 3. Implications of Leave of Absence 4. Imposed Leave of Absence
More informationAdmission ADMISSIONS POLICIES APPLYING TO BISHOP S UNIVERSITY. Application Procedure. Application Deadlines. CEGEP Applicants
Admission General inquiries from prospective students should be directed to: Recruitment Office Bishop s University 2600 College Street Sherbrooke, Quebec J1M 1Z7 Tel. 819-822-9600 ext. 2681 or 1 877-822-8200
More informationTITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION
ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 25 TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : PERSONNEL Section 25.10 Accredited Institution PART 25 CERTIFICATION
More informationAccreditation of Prior Experiential and Certificated Learning (APECL) Guidance for Applicants/Students
Accreditation of Prior Experiential and Certificated Learning (APECL) Guidance for Applicants/Students The following guidance notes set provide an overview for applicants and students in relation to making
More informationDIPLOMA IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LITERATURE PROGRAMME
DIPLOMA IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LITERATURE PROGRAMME Dept. of Language Studies This booklet contains important information about the Diploma in English Language & Literature Programme. Please read it carefully
More informationStudent Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling
Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling Title: Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling Author: Academic Dean Approved by: Academic Board Date: February 2014 Review date: February
More informationGuidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications
Annex 1 APPROVED by the Management Board of the Estonian Research Council on 23 March 2016, Directive No. 1-1.4/16/63 Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications 1. Scope The guidelines
More informationSTUDENT CHARTER INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ET/A ENSCHEDE, 31 AUGUST 2017
- STUDENT CHARTER INDUSTRIAL DESIGN 2017 2018 ET/A-17.8770 ENSCHEDE, 31 AUGUST 2017 PREFACE This document is part of the student charter for Industrial Design. The student charter contains a description
More informationUSC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING APPOINTMENTS, PROMOTIONS AND TENURE (APT) GUIDELINES Office of the Dean USC Viterbi School of Engineering OHE 200- MC 1450 Revised 2016 PREFACE This document serves as
More informationRecognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy Scope This policy is applicable to Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd, (KBS) and applies to individuals enrolled in KBS courses. Purpose Recognition of Prior Learning
More informationUNIVERSITY OF ESSEX UNDERGRADUATE RULES OF ASSESSMENT
UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX UNDERGRADUATE RULES OF ASSESSMENT (Academic Year 2008-2009) 3. Three-Year Honours Degrees (Including Degrees with a Preliminary Stage) 3.1 PROGRESSION 3.1.1 In der to progress from
More informationDoctor in Engineering (EngD) Additional Regulations
UCL Academic Manual 2016-17 Chapter 8: Derogations and Variations Doctor in Engineering (EngD) Additional Regulations Contact: Lizzie Vinton, Assessment Regulations and Governance Manager, Academic Services,
More informationRecognition of Prior Learning
Page 1 of 19 Recognition of Prior Learning ACADEMIC POLICY Approved by Academic Council on 25 th April 2012 Version number: v5 Last updated: 25 th April 2012 Page 2 of 19 Policy Title Recognition of Prior
More informationProgramme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate
Programme Specification MSc in International Real Estate IRE GUIDE OCTOBER 2014 ROYAL AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, CIRENCESTER PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc International Real Estate NB The information contained
More informationCourse and Examination Regulations
OER Ma CSM 15-16 d.d. April 14, 2015 Course and Examination Regulations Valid from 1 September 2015 Master s Programme Crisis and Security Management These course and examination regulations have been
More informationPROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1 Awarding Institution Newcastle University 2 Teaching Institution Newcastle University 3 Final Award MSc 4 Programme Title Digital Architecture 5 UCAS/Programme Code 5112 6 Programme
More informationInstructions concerning the right to study
INSTRUCTIONS 1(10) THE RIGHT TO STUDY Instructions concerning the right to study 1. Purpose of the instructions 2. Application procedures 3. Transfer applications 4. Compulsory annual registration 5. Maximum
More informationConditions of study and examination regulations of the. European Master of Science in Midwifery
Conditions of study and examination regulations of the European Master of Science in Midwifery Midwifery Research and Education Unit Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hannover Medical School September
More informationREGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -
REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY September 2013 - i - REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY Approved by CIT Academic Council, April 2013 - ii - TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION: THE RESEARCH
More informationMay 2011 (Revised March 2016)
PROTOCOL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ERASMUS AND STUDY ABROAD IN TSM TSM Management Committee - Sub-Committee on TSM Erasmus and Study Abroad 2015/16 May 2011 (Revised March 2016) Contents Protocol for the Management
More informationDIPLOMA IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LITERATURE PROGRAMME
1 DIPLOMA IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LITERATURE PROGRAMME Dept. of Language Studies This booklet contains important information about the Diploma in English Language & Literature Programme. Please read it carefully
More informationRedeployment Arrangements at Primary Level for Surplus Permanent & CID Holding Teachers
Redeployment Arrangements at Primary Level for Surplus Permanent & CID Holding Teachers March 2017 This document relates only to the main redeployment panels set out below i.e. Main Panels on which surplus
More information2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007
Please note: these Regulations are draft - they have been made but are still subject to Parliamentary Approval. They S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND The Further
More informationMSc Education and Training for Development
MSc Education and Training for Development Awarding Institution: The University of Reading Teaching Institution: The University of Reading Faculty of Life Sciences Programme length: 6 month Postgraduate
More informationDirectorate Children & Young People Policy Directive Complaints Procedure for MOD Schools
Directorate Children & Young People Policy Directive 3.2.8 Complaints Procedure for MOD Schools Version 2.0 January 2017 Preface Authorisation 1. This DCYP Policy Directive has been authorised for use
More informationHARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification
HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification 1 Awarding Institution: Harper Adams University 2 Teaching Institution: Askham Bryan College 3 Course Accredited by: Not Applicable 4 Final Award and Level:
More informationResearch Training Program Stipend (Domestic) [RTPSD] 2017 Rules
Research Training Program Stipend (Domestic) [RTPSD] 1. BACKGROUND RTPSD scholarships are awarded to students of exceptional research potential undertaking a Higher Degree by Research (HDR). RTPSDs are
More informationIUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct
IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct Preamble IUPUI disciplinary procedures determine responsibility and appropriate consequences for violations
More informationTHE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy
The Queen s Church of England Primary School Encouraging every child to reach their full potential, nurtured and supported in a Christian community which lives by the values of Love, Compassion and Respect.
More informationGeneral syllabus for third-cycle courses and study programmes in
ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY This is a translation of a Swedish document. In the event of a discrepancy, the Swedishlanguage version shall prevail. General syllabus for third-cycle courses and study programmes in
More informationConcept: laid down by the Executive Board on 15 February 2017 and adopted by the General Council.
PROGRAMME AND EXAMINATION REGULATIONS Safety and Security Management Studies (SSMS) The Hague University of Applied Sciences 2017-2018 Concept: laid down by the Executive Board on 15 February 2017 and
More informationGRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D.
GRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D. 05/15/2012 The policies listed herein are applicable to all students
More informationCode of Practice on Freedom of Speech
Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech Rev Date Purpose of Issue / Description of Change Equality Impact Assessment Completed 1. October 2011 Initial Issue 2. 8 th June 2015 Revision version 2 28 th July
More informationLevel 6. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) Fee for 2017/18 is 9,250*
Programme Specification: Undergraduate For students starting in Academic Year 2017/2018 1. Course Summary Names of programme(s) and award title(s) Award type Mode of study Framework of Higher Education
More informationLEARNING AGREEMENT FOR STUDIES
LEARNING AGREEMENT FOR STUDIES The Student Last name (s) First name (s) Date of birth Nationality 1 Sex [M/F] Academic year 20../20.. Study cycle 2 Phone Subject area, Code 3 E-mail The Sending Institution
More informationAGENDA ITEM VI-E October 2005 Page 1 CHAPTER 13. FINANCIAL PLANNING
Page 1 CHAPTER 13. FINANCIAL PLANNING Subchapter F. FORMULA FUNDING AND TUITION CHARGED FOR REPEATED AND EXCESS HOURS OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS Section 13.100. Purpose. 13.101. Authority 13.102. Definitions.
More informationBSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)
BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study) The London Institute of Banking & Finance is a registered charity, incorporated by Royal Charter. Programme Specification 1. GENERAL
More informationPolicy Manual Master of Special Education Program
Policy Manual Master of Special Education Program Director Dr. Eric Michael Warfield Hall - Room 309 717-262-3109 eric.michael@wilson.edu Web Address http://www.wilson.edu/master-special-education Program
More informationwith effect from 24 July 2014
Doctoral Degree Regulations for the Award of the Doctoral Degree Dr. rer. pol. at the University of Bremen and for Students of the Bremen International Graduate School for Social Sciences (BIGSSS) the
More informationP920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning
P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Peterborough Regional College is committed to ensuring the decision making process and outcomes for admitting students with prior
More informationPROGRAMME AND EXAMINATION REGULATIONS
PROGRAMME AND EXAMINATION REGULATIONS International Financial Management & Control The Hague University of Applied Sciences 2017-2018 Laid down by the Executive Board on 15 February 2017 and adopted by
More informationUCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs
UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs I. General A. Purpose An endowed chair provides funds to a chair holder in support of his or her teaching, research, and service, and is supported by a
More informationSTUDENT HANDBOOK ACCA
STUDENT HANDBOOK ACCA 2016-2017 1 Welcome note Dear ACCA Students, Thank you for choosing to study towards your ACCA qualification with Career Enhancement Centre (CEC) a division of City University College
More informationExamination Rules University College Absalon
Examination Rules University College Absalon Updated in august 2017 Table of contents... 1 Examination Rules... 1 University College Absalon... 1 1. Introduction... 1 2. Objectives and scope of application,
More informationAcademic Regulations Governing the Juris Doctor Program 1
Academic Regulations Governing the Juris Doctor Program 1 Revised August 2017 Table of Contents 1 DEGREE REQUIREMENTS... 6 1.1 Academic Credits... 6 Minimum... 6 In-Class (or Direct Faculty Instruction)
More informationExclusions Policy. Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May OAT Model Policy
Exclusions Policy Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May 2018 OAT Model Policy 1 Contents Action to be invoked by Senior Staff in Serious Disciplinary Matters 1. When a serious incident occurs,
More informationProgramme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT
Programme Specification BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT D GUIDE SEPTEMBER 2016 ROYAL AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, CIRENCESTER PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT NB The information contained
More informationVI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status
University of Baltimore VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status Approved by University Faculty Senate 2/11/09 Approved by Attorney General s Office 2/12/09 Approved by Provost 2/24/09
More informationCOURSE HANDBOOK 2016/17. Certificate of Higher Education in PSYCHOLOGY
COURSE HANDBOOK 2016/17 Certificate of Higher Education in PSYCHOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2016 2 WELCOME TO NEW STUDENTS On behalf of all the staff of the Department of Psychological Sciences, may I welcome you
More informationMANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM
MANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM Article 1. Definitions. 1.1 This management charter uses the following definitions: (a) the Executive Board : the Executive Board of the Foundation,
More informationTHE UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES Faculty of Medical Sciences, Mona. Regulations
THE UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES Faculty of Medical Sciences, Mona Regulations MB BS Medical Undergraduate Programme (including the degree of B Med Sci) 1. Entry Requirements...5 2. Qualifications for
More informationPharmaceutical Medicine
Specialty specific guidance on documents to be supplied in evidence for an application for entry onto the Specialist Register with a Certificate of Eligibility for Specialist Registration (CESR) Pharmaceutical
More informationPost-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities
Post-16 transport to education and training Statutory guidance for local authorities February 2014 Contents Summary 3 Key points 4 The policy landscape 4 Extent and coverage of the 16-18 transport duty
More informationSpring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview
Overview Ohio Senate Bill 311 allows alternate pathways for those students who are eligible to receive high school credit through the use of Credit Flexibility Plans (CFPs). Spring Valley Academy students
More informationCOLLEGE OF INTEGRATED CHINESE MEDICINE ADMISSIONS POLICY
Page 1 of 5 COLLEGE OF INTEGRATED CHINESE MEDICINE ADMISSIONS POLICY Purpose of the admissions policy The purpose of the College Admissions Policy is to ensure that the applicant: Has the academic abilities
More informationQUEEN S UNIVERSITY BELFAST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DENTISTRY AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES ADMISSION POLICY STATEMENT FOR MEDICINE FOR 2018 ENTRY
QUEEN S UNIVERSITY BELFAST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DENTISTRY AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES ADMISSION POLICY STATEMENT FOR MEDICINE FOR 2018 ENTRY Introduction It is the policy of the University that all candidates
More informationQUEEN S UNIVERSITY BELFAST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DENTISTRY AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES ADMISSION POLICY STATEMENT FOR DENTISTRY FOR 2016 ENTRY
FINAL QUEEN S UNIVERSITY BELFAST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DENTISTRY AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES ADMISSION POLICY STATEMENT FOR DENTISTRY FOR 2016 ENTRY 1. Introduction It is the policy of the University that all
More informationCÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #8
www.cegep-heritage.qc.ca 8 CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #8 COMING INTO FORCE: November 29, 1994 REVISED: June 20, 2013 ADMINISTRATOR: Director of Student Services Preamble The present policy is established
More informationRules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools
Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools Table of Contents I. Scope and Authority...49 Rule 1: Scope and Purpose... 49 Rule 2: Council Responsibility and Authority with Regard to Accreditation Status...
More informationCourse Brochure 2016/17
BEng honours Chemical Engineering By distance learning Accredited by the Course Brochure 2016/17 1 The contents of this prospectus are, as far as possible, up to date and accurate at the date of publication.
More informationORDINANCES FOR BTECH PROGRAMS For details please visit at the following link: http://www.iiitd.ac.in/sites/default/files/docs/education/btech-ordinances.pdf 1 REGULATIONS FOR BTECH PROGRAMS 1 General (1)
More informationI. General provisions. II. Rules for the distribution of funds of the Financial Aid Fund for students
Rules and Regulations for the calculation, awarding and payment of financial aid for full-time and part-time students with awarding criteria and procedures at the Warsaw Film School I. General provisions
More informationSchool Participation Agreement Terms and Conditions
School Participation Terms and Conditions For schools enrolling students into online IB Diploma Programme courses This is a contract where it is agreed as follows: 1. Interpretations and Definitions The
More informationFaculty of Social Sciences
Faculty of Social Sciences Programme Specification Programme title: BA (Hons) Sociology Academic Year: 017/18 Degree Awarding Body: Partner(s), delivery organisation or support provider (if appropriate):
More informationPROGRAMME AND EXAMINATION REGULATIONS
PROGRAMME AND EXAMINATION REGULATIONS Industrial Design Engineering [Open] Innovator The Hague University of Applied Sciences 2017-2018 Laid down by the Executive Board on 26-06-2017 after adoptation by
More informationMaster in Science in Chemistry with Biomedicine - UMSH4CSCB
Master in Science in Chemistry with Biomedicine - UMSH4CSCB Academic year modifications to take effect 2016/7 Description and rationale for changes Please describe as clearly and precisely as possible
More informationSoutheast Arkansas College 1900 Hazel Street Pine Bluff, Arkansas (870) Version 1.3.0, 28 July 2015
Southeast Arkansas College 1900 Hazel Street Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71603 www.seark.edu (870) 543-5900 Version 1.3.0, 28 July 2015 Concurrent Credit Student Handbook 2015/16 Table of Contents What is Concurrent
More informationRULES AND GUIDELINES BOARD OF EXAMINERS (under Article 7.12b, section 3 of the Higher Education Act (WHW))
RULES AND GUIDELINES BOARD OF EXAMINERS (under Article 7.12b, section 3 of the Higher Education Act (WHW)) 2011-2012 MASTER OF SCIENCE CIVIL ENGINEERING DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Rules and Guidelines
More informationStudy Board Guidelines Western Kentucky University Department of Psychological Sciences and Department of Psychology
Study Board Guidelines Western Kentucky University Department of Psychological Sciences and Department of Psychology Note: This document is a guide for use of the Study Board. A copy of the Department
More information(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.
16 KAR 7:010. Kentucky Teacher Internship Program. RELATES TO: KRS 156.101, 161.028, 161.030, 161.048, 161.095 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: KRS 161.028(1)(a), 161.030 NECESSITY, FUNCTION, AND CONFORMITY: KRS 161.030(5)
More informationMMU/MAN: MASINDE MULIRO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
MMU/MAN: 502001 MASINDE MULIRO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EXAMINATION HANDBOOK 2014 2019 2 VISION To be a centre of Excellence in Science and Technology responsive to development needs of society
More informationPROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1 Awarding Institution Newcastle University 2 Teaching Institution Newcastle University 3 Final Award M.Sc. 4 Programme Title Industrial and Commercial Biotechnology 5 UCAS/Programme
More informationADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY
ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY William Carter, Director of Admission College Hall 140. MSC 128. Extension 2315. Texas A&M University-Kingsville adheres to high standards of academic excellence and admits
More informationFlorida A&M University Graduate Policies and Procedures
Florida A&M University Graduate Policies and Procedures Each graduate program has a different mission, and some programs may have requirements in addition to or different from those in the Graduate School.
More informationSection 3 Scope and structure of the Master's degree programme, teaching and examination language Appendix 1
Degree Programme and Examination Regulations for the Elite Master s degree programme Standards of Decision-Making Across Cultures (SDAC) of the Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Theology of Friedrich-Alexander-Universität
More informationPROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UWE UWE. Taught course. JACS code. Ongoing
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION Section 1: Basic Data Awarding institution/body Teaching institution Delivery Location(s) Faculty responsible for programme Modular Scheme title UWE UWE UWE: St Matthias campus
More informationSeries IV - Financial Management and Marketing Fiscal Year
Series IV - Financial Management and Marketing... 1 4.101 Fiscal Year... 1 4.102 Budget Preparation... 2 4.201 Authorized Signatures... 3 4.2021 Financial Assistance... 4 4.2021-R Financial Assistance
More informationHenley Business School at Univ of Reading
MSc in Corporate Real Estate For students entering in 2012/3 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date of specification: Programme
More information