Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

Transcription

1 Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) Kaiserstrasse 76 Karlsruhe Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) Sehr geehrter Herr Prof. Dr. Alexander Mädche (PERSÖNLICH) Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden Sehr geehrter Herr Prof. Dr. Mädche, mit diesem Schreiben erhalten Sie die Ergebnisse der automatisierten Auswertung Ihrer Lehrveranstaltung Digital Transformation of Service Systems. Ihre Lehrveranstaltung Digital Transformation of Service Systems hat den Lehrqualitätsindex LQI = 00. Die Auswertung zu Ihrer Lehrveranstaltung gliedert sich in folgende Abschnitte: Zu Beginn der Auswertung werden die Ergebnisse der Befragung in Form von Häufigkeitstabellen dargestellt. Bei allen Fragen wird die Anzahl der abgegebenen Antworten (n) angezeigt. Bei den er- Skalafragen finden Sie zusätzlich neben dem Histogramm den Mittelwert (mw) und die Standardabweichung (s) der jeweiligen Frage. Neben manchen Fragen finden Sie zudem ein Ampelsymbol abgebildet. Diese Fragen dienen der Qualitätssicherung der Lehre. Im vorletzten Teil werden sämtliche er-skalenfragen in einem Profilliniendiagramm abgebildet. Zuletzt sind die Antworten zu den offenen Fragen aufgelistet. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Ihr Evaluationsteam

2 Prof. Dr. Alexander Mädche Digital Transformation of Service Systems () Erfasste Fragebögen = 7 Periode: WS 7/8 Prof. Dr. Alexander Mädche, Digital Transformation of Service Systems Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen Legende Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Std.-Abw. Mittelwert Fragetext Linker Pol % % Rechter Pol n=anzahl mw=mittelwert s=std.-abw. E.=Enthaltung Skala Histogramm Qualitätsindex Erklärung der Ampelsymbole Der Mittelwert liegt unterhalb der Qualitätsrichtlinie. Der Mittelwert liegt im Toleranzbereich der Qualitätsrichtlinie. Der Mittelwert liegt innerhalb der Qualitätsrichtlinie.. Questions concerning the studies.) Which program do you study? Production and Operations Management n=7 Management of Product Development Electronic Systems Engineering and Management Service Management and Engineering 76.% Financial Engineering.% Green Mobility Engineering Energy Engineering and Management MBA Fundamentals Program Technical Short Courses.) How many hours per week have you put, on average, into your preparation and follow-up for this course, so far? none < h 6.% < h.% < h.% < h.% < h 8.8% <6 h 6.% 6<7 h.% 7 h and more n=6. Questions concerning the lectures EvaSys Auswertung Seite

3 Prof. Dr. Alexander Mädche, Digital Transformation of Service Systems.) My commitment to this course is reflected by: (multiple choice) regular attendance 9.% constant taking of notes 8.8% active contributions 76.% regular studying at home.% study group attendance 8.% reading of the recommended literature.8% work through scripts/materials 9.% tutorial/exercise attendance 7.% internet research.% n=7.) How do you assess the participation of your colleagues in the course? very intensive 6,7% 9,%,9% very small n=7 mw=, s=0,6.) How much do you enjoy attending this course? very much 8,8%,%,9% n=7 mw=,7 s=0,6.) Coordination of the contents of this course with that of other courses in my curriculum is,% 6,7%,% 6,7% n= mw=,7 s=0,96 Please rate the lecture regarding to the following aspects:.) Contents very easy 9,% 8,8%,8% very difficult n=7 mw=,8 s=0,6.6) Scope little 7,% 7,%,9% much n=7 mw=,9 s=0,6.7) Previous knowledge required little,%,8% %,% 6,% much n=6 mw=,6 s=,09.8) Speed too slow 76,%,8%,8% too fast n=7 mw=, s=0,7.9) Clairity (helpful examples) very clear 7,% 9,%,8%,8% very abstract n=7 mw=,88 s=,0.0) Suitability of teaching and learning materials 7,%,%,8% n=7 mw=,6 s=0,7.) Do you understand the importance of the course contents to your further studies? very clearly 7,%,% 7,6% n=7 mw=,7 s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite

4 Prof. Dr. Alexander Mädche, Digital Transformation of Service Systems.) The course enhances (multiple choice) my practical competences 76.% n=7 transfer and application of the lessons learned to other contexts 70.6% my analytical capacities.% my own initiative 7.% my capacity to cooperate 76.% my independent working skills 9.%.) I learn a lot during this course completely true,% 8,8% n=6 mw=,88 s=0,7.) Was the lecture material of good quality,% 6,7%,8% n=7 mw=,88 s=0,6.) Were you able to understand the lecturer in terms of language 8,% 7,6% n=7 mw=,8 s=0,9.6) Were you content with the rate of interactive elements such as team work, case studies and exercises in the lecture? very much 8,8% 9,%,9%,9% n=7 mw=,9 s=0,87. Questions concerning the room conditions.) The size of the room in comparison to the number of course participants is appropriate 70,6%,%,9% inappropriate n=7 mw=, s=0,6.) The acoustics in this room is 7,%,9% n=7 mw=, s=0,.) View conditions in this room are 7,% 7,%,9% n=7 mw=,9 s=0,6. Monitoring.) Please rate the course as a whole n=6 mw=, s=0,.) How large is the the amount of work for this course? very small,%,8% % very large n=6 mw=,9 s=0,77.) The amount of work required for this course is... adequate,% 9,%,%,9% inadequate n=7 mw=,9 s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite

5 Prof. Dr. Alexander Mädche, Digital Transformation of Service Systems.) How is the course structured? very well 9,% 8,8%,9%,9% ly n=7 mw=,88 s=0,78.) Does the lecturer appear dedicated and motivated during the course? 8,8%,%,9% n=7 mw=, s=0,8.6) Is the lecturer responsive to questions and concerns of the students? 6,%,% 6,% n=6 mw=, s=0,8 Thank you for your cooperation! For more information see: EvaSys Auswertung Seite

6 Prof. Dr. Alexander Mädche, Digital Transformation of Service Systems Profillinie Teilbereich: Name der/des Lehrenden: Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: (Name der Umfrage) 0. WS 07/8 Hector School Prof. Dr. Alexander Mädche Digital Transformation of Service Systems Verwendete Werte in der Profillinie: Mittelwert. Questions concerning the lectures.) How do you assess the participation of your colleagues in the course? very intensive very small n=7 mw=,.) How much do you enjoy attending this course? very much n=7 mw=,7.) Coordination of the contents of this course with that of other courses in my curriculum is n= mw=,7.) Contents very easy very difficult n=7 mw=,8.6) Scope little much n=7 mw=,9.7) Previous knowledge required little much n=6 mw=,6.8) Speed too slow too fast n=7 mw=,.9) Clairity (helpful examples) very clear very abstract n=7 mw=,88.0) Suitability of teaching and learning materials n=7 mw=,6.) Do you understand the importance of the course contents to your further studies? very clearly n=7 mw=,7.) I learn a lot during this course completely true n=6 mw=,88.) Was the lecture material of good quality n=7 mw=,88.) Were you able to understand the lecturer in terms of language n=7 mw=,8.6) Were you content with the rate of interactive elements such as team work, case studies and exercises in the lecture? very much n=7 mw=,9. Questions concerning the room conditions.) The size of the room in comparison to the number of course participants is appropriate inappropriate n=7 mw=,.) The acoustics in this room is n=7 mw=,.) View conditions in this room are n=7 mw=,9. Monitoring.) Please rate the course as a whole n=6 mw=,0.) How large is the the amount of work for this course? very small very large n=6 mw=, EvaSys Auswertung Seite

7 Prof. Dr. Alexander Mädche, Digital Transformation of Service Systems.) The amount of work required for this course is... adequate inadequate.) How is the course structured? very well ly n=7 mw=,9 n=7 mw=,88.) Does the lecturer appear dedicated and motivated during the course? n=7 mw=,.6) Is the lecturer responsive to questions and concerns of the students? n=6 mw=, EvaSys Auswertung Seite 6

8 Mario Nadj, Digital Transformation of Service Systems Mario Nadj Digital Transformation of Service Systems (7) Erfasste Fragebögen = 6 Periode: WS 7/8 Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen Legende Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Std.-Abw. Mittelwert Fragetext Linker Pol % % Rechter Pol n=anzahl mw=mittelwert s=std.-abw. E.=Enthaltung Skala Histogramm Qualitätsindex Erklärung der Ampelsymbole Der Mittelwert liegt unterhalb der Qualitätsrichtlinie. Der Mittelwert liegt im Toleranzbereich der Qualitätsrichtlinie. Der Mittelwert liegt innerhalb der Qualitätsrichtlinie.. Questions concerning the studies.) Which program do you study? Production and Operations Management n= Management of Product Development Electronic Systems Engineering and Management Service Management and Engineering 7.% Financial Engineering 8.6% Green Mobility Engineering Energy Engineering and Management MBA Fundamentals Program Technical Short Courses.) How many hours per week have you put, on average, into your preparation and follow-up for this course, so far? none < h < h < h 7.7% < h 8.% < h.% <6 h 7.7% 6<7 h.% 7 h and more.% n=. Questions concerning the lectures EvaSys Auswertung Seite

9 Mario Nadj, Digital Transformation of Service Systems.) My commitment to this course is reflected by: (multiple choice) regular attendance 87.% constant taking of notes 68.8% active contributions 8.% regular studying at home % study group attendance 87.% reading of the recommended literature work through scripts/materials.8% tutorial/exercise attendance internet research n=6.) How do you assess the participation of your colleagues in the course? very intensive 66,7%,% very small n= mw=, s=0,9.) How much do you enjoy attending this course? very much 6,%,% 6,% n=6 mw=, s=0,8.) Coordination of the contents of this course with that of other courses in my curriculum is 6,%,%,% 7,7% n= mw=,69 s=,0 Please rate the lecture regarding to the following aspects:.) Contents very easy 6,% 8,8%,%,8% very difficult n=6 mw=, s=0,96.6) Scope little 6,%,8%,8% 6,% much n=6 mw=, s=0,7.7) Previous knowledge required little 6,7% 6,7% 6,7% much n= mw=, s=,.8) Speed too slow 66,7%,% too fast n= mw=,7 s=0,7.9) Clairity (helpful examples) very clear,%,%,% very abstract n= mw=,87 s=,.0) Suitability of teaching and learning materials 6,%,8% n=6 mw=, s=0,.) Do you understand the importance of the course contents to your further studies? very clearly 6,7%,% n= mw=,67 s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite

10 Mario Nadj, Digital Transformation of Service Systems.) The course enhances (multiple choice) my practical competences 87.% n=6 transfer and application of the lessons learned to other contexts my analytical capacities.8% my own initiative 6.% my capacity to cooperate 68.8% my independent working skills 7.%.) I learn a lot during this course completely true 6,7%,% n= mw=,67 s=0,7.) Was the lecture material of good quality 68,8% % 6,% n=6 mw=,8 s=0,6.) Were you able to understand the lecturer in terms of language 9,8% 6,% n=6 mw=,06 s=0,.6) Were you content with the rate of interactive elements such as team work, case studies and exercises in the lecture? very much 8,% 6,7% n= mw=, s=0,8. Questions concerning the room conditions.) The size of the room in comparison to the number of course participants is appropriate 7,% 6,7% inappropriate n= mw=,7 s=0,6.) The acoustics in this room is 6,% 6,7% n= mw=,7 s=0,6.) View conditions in this room are 6,% 7,% 6,% n=6 mw=, s=0,6. Monitoring.) Please rate the course as a whole 7,% 6,7% n= mw=,7 s=0,6.) How large is the the amount of work for this course? very small 7,% 7,%,9%,9% very large n= mw=, s=0,89.) The amount of work required for this course is... adequate,8% 0,8%,% inadequate n= mw=,6 s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite

11 Mario Nadj, Digital Transformation of Service Systems.) How is the course structured? very well 7,%,%,% ly n= mw=, s=0,7.) Does the lecturer appear dedicated and motivated during the course? 0 n= mw= s=0.6) Is the lecturer responsive to questions and concerns of the students? 9,% 6,7% n= mw=,07 s=0,6 Thank you for your cooperation! For more information see: EvaSys Auswertung Seite

12 Mario Nadj, Digital Transformation of Service Systems Profillinie Teilbereich: Name der/des Lehrenden: Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: (Name der Umfrage) 0. WS 07/8 Hector School Mario Nadj Digital Transformation of Service Systems Verwendete Werte in der Profillinie: Mittelwert. Questions concerning the lectures.) How do you assess the participation of your colleagues in the course? very intensive very small n= mw=,.) How much do you enjoy attending this course? very much n=6 mw=,0.) Coordination of the contents of this course with that of other courses in my curriculum is n= mw=,69.) Contents very easy very difficult n=6 mw=,.6) Scope little much n=6 mw=,0.7) Previous knowledge required little much n= mw=,0.8) Speed too slow too fast n= mw=,7.9) Clairity (helpful examples) very clear very abstract n= mw=,87.0) Suitability of teaching and learning materials n=6 mw=,.) Do you understand the importance of the course contents to your further studies? very clearly n= mw=,67.) I learn a lot during this course completely true n= mw=,67.) Was the lecture material of good quality n=6 mw=,8.) Were you able to understand the lecturer in terms of language n=6 mw=,06.6) Were you content with the rate of interactive elements such as team work, case studies and exercises in the lecture? very much n= mw=,. Questions concerning the room conditions.) The size of the room in comparison to the number of course participants is appropriate inappropriate n= mw=,7.) The acoustics in this room is n= mw=,7.) View conditions in this room are n=6 mw=,0. Monitoring.) Please rate the course as a whole n= mw=,7.) How large is the the amount of work for this course? very small very large n= mw=, EvaSys Auswertung Seite

13 Mario Nadj, Digital Transformation of Service Systems.) The amount of work required for this course is... adequate inadequate.) How is the course structured? very well ly n= mw=,6 n= mw=,0.) Does the lecturer appear dedicated and motivated during the course? n= mw=,00.6) Is the lecturer responsive to questions and concerns of the students? n= mw=, EvaSys Auswertung Seite 6