ACADEMIC REGULATIONS

Transcription

1 ACADEMIC REGULATIONS FOR UNDERGRADUATE AWARDS 1. Introduction 1.1 This document sets out the regulations for the taught programmes of study with the Medway School of Pharmacy leading to joint awards of the University of Greenwich and the University of Kent. They will apply to all students registered for taught programmes regardless of the University of registration. However, in general these regulations reflect the academic regulations of the Primary Administering University (PAU) the University of Kent. 1.2 The programmes will be delivered by the conjoint Medway School of Pharmacy. Academic and administrative management of the School and programme will be the responsibility of the joint Planning Group, consisting of senior representatives of both Universities and the Head of School. 2. School Responsibility to Student 2.1 Personal Academic Support System Students will receive academic support and guidance through the School network of personal tutors Personal Tutor. Each student will be allocated a personal tutor for pastoral care. This is in line with the general regulations of the Primary Administering University Code of Practice (see Students will be informed of the roles of their personal tutors as well as module convenors, year tutors and programme leaders All new students will be advised to make contact with their personal tutor within the first month of registration. Thereafter contact will be maintained to meet student need but will be a minimum of once per term. Distance learning students will meet their personal tutor at induction and maintain contact by agreed arrangements. 1

2 2.1.4 All students will receive individual information with details of their: Programme, year/stage, ID Programme leader Year coordinator Personal tutor The University of Kent Student Data System (SDS) provides details of tutee marks for personal tutors. Coursework marks are also available to students on SDS; examination and project marks are made available online only following the Board of Examiners. All students will also receive results by post. 2.2 Assessment Feedback For direct learning students all coursework must be submitted, with header sheets through the School Reception. This will ensure accurate records of submission are kept. Coursework in the form of tests are specifically excluded from these arrangements. Some practical reports are excluded from these arrangements. For distance learning students all assessments will be submitted to the Distance Learning Administrator who will maintain records of each submission A structured assessment form will be used to provide feedback to both direct and distance learning students All coursework assignment dates will be set in writing and in a timely manner to ensure that students are able to prepare effectively and manage their time. Students will also be given dates by which coursework will be returned. For distance learning students these dates will be agreed between the student and the tutor. For Direct Learning Students: For examined modules, no associated coursework assignments should normally be set after Week 8 within a term, to allow time for submission, marking and feedback All coursework should be marked and returned, with feedback within three weeks of the submission deadline during term time, in line with the Student Charter The practical elements of a module should have a final submission date, given in writing, which is two weeks after completion of the last practical exercise, or at the end of the term, as appropriate. This should use a header sheet, and go through the School Reception. It will be a formal requirement of the School that all practical elements must have some intermediate feedback and assessment The effectiveness of feedback is monitored through the Medway School of Pharmacy Student-Staff Liaison Committee, the University Student Satisfaction Survey and the National Student Survey. 2

3 2.3 Assessment Criteria It is acknowledged that tutors give verbal advice about criteria for assessment. However this must be supported by written advice which may take one or more of the following forms: Reference to which module learning outcomes are being tested Use of a pro forma describing specific criteria used for assessment Use of standard marks forms which contain the assessment scheme used (e.g. project and case study report forms) Standard handouts e.g. on how essays are assessed or how to give an oral presentation. Use of marked student answers as exemplars of good work In order to support students appreciation of what is expected of them they will be provided with information on a number of guidelines and resources, such as: Referencing ( The Student Learning Advisory service ( Assignment Survival Kit ( Plagiarism ( The Students Charter ( pdf) No modification of the assessment procedures is acceptable without the written permission of the Programme Leader and School Director of Learning and Teaching. 2.4 Translation dictionaries The policy of the Medway School of Pharmacy, in line with the Universities of Kent and Greenwich Undergraduate Academic Regulations and the proposed educational standards of the new Pharmacy regulatory body, does not normally permit the use of translation dictionaries in coursework assessments and examinations. 3. Responsibilities of Students 3.1 Intermission Procedures These are to be followed when a student admitted to a programme wishes to interrupt their programme of study for a prescribed period of time. It is important that students read the guidance about intermission available on the website for the Office for Quality Assurance and Validation, ( before making an application to intermit. The intermissions form should be completed and submitted to the Head of School prior to withdrawal from the University registration system. International students may want to seek advice from the International Office staff as there may be implications for their visa. 3

4 3.2 Attendance and Progression Direct learning students are required to demonstrate a commitment to their programme of study by regular attendance at lectures, laboratory classes, seminars and workshops and successful completion of summative and formative assessment tasks. The summative assessment for a programme of study, will normally involve a variety of assessment methods. These may include formal written examinations, practicebased assessments, laboratory reports, coursework, multiple choice questions, group projects, seminar presentations and case studies. Each module has a clearly defined assessment requirement, which must be completed before the student can pass the module and obtain the credits. In addition to the summative assessment, each module may have a requirement in terms of formative assessment tasks. These are designed to provide students with feedback on their performance and to enable staff to identify areas where remedial work may be required. Formative assessment tasks may take the form of essays, laboratory reports or case vignettes Distance learning students are required to attend the study days unless a specific exemption has been granted by the Programme Leader on demonstration of prior learning in the area. 3.3 Communication with the Board of Examiners. It is the responsibility of students to attend examinations and to submit work for assessment as required and to provide documentary evidence in advance of the examiners meeting, including any relevant information on personal circumstances which may have affected their performance and which they wish the examiners to take in account. Students should submit a completed concession claim form through the School reception. If a student fails to attend examinations or to submit work for assessment without good cause, the examiners have the authority to deem the student to have failed the assessments concerned. If a student fails without good cause to provide the examiners in advance of their meeting with information about any personal circumstances that may have affected their performance in assessments, any subsequent appeal on these grounds may be rejected. 3.4 Appeals. If a student wishes to appeal, he or she should complete and submit the form for appeals against recommendations of Boards of Examiners. (see Cheating and Plagiarism. There are various forms of academic dishonesty but this will normally refer to cheating in examinations or presenting work for assessment which does not represent the student's own efforts. All examples of cheating or plagiarism will be penalised, as described in the Academic Regulations of the PAU ( 3.6 Health and Safety. In accordance with the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and regulations made under it, it is University Policy to take all reasonably practicable steps to ensure the health, safety and welfare of all University personnel, students, visitors and members of the public who are, or may be, affected by its activities. This is achieved by: The provision and maintenance of safe and healthy working conditions. Properly maintained and guarded machinery. 4

5 The operation, design and maintenance of safe systems of work. Provision of information, training and supervision appropriate to the University's activities Safety is the concern of both staff and students. The University is responsible for providing a safe working environment but students are responsible for observing the University rules and for conducting laboratory and fieldwork in a safe manner The Head of School will have the authority to deny a student access to laboratories and/or field trips if the student fails to comply with any notified safety rules. 4. The Undergraduate Board of Examiners 4.1 The terms of reference of the Boards of Examiners are as per the Regulations for taught awards for the PAU (see Composition of Board of Examiners. The Board of Examiners should consist of the following: Head of School (Chair) or nominee Director of Learning and Teaching Programme Leader Programme Teaching Team External Examiners School Quality Assurance Officer/Senior Administrator Head of Assessment and Examinations The External Examiner. The role of the External Examiner is defined in Annex K of the code of Practice for Quality assurance of Taught Programmes of the PAU (see 5. The Conferment of Awards 5.1 The Undergraduate Board of Examiners may make recommendations for the conferment of the following awards: Certificate of Higher Education Diploma of Higher Education Foundation Degree Pharmacy Practice Foundation Degree Medicines Management BSc Pharmaceutical Studies (at least 300 credits) BSc (Hons) Pharmaceutical Studies (at least 360 credits) Master of Pharmacy A Certificate of Higher Education will be awarded if a student successfully completes the Stage 1 on a Degree programme, or its equivalent (at least 120 credits at Level 4 or above), but does not continue into Stage 2, or if the candidate fails the second year assessment and does not retrieve the failure A Diploma of Higher Education will be awarded if a student successfully completes Stages 1 and 2 on an Honours Degree programme, or its equivalent (at least 240 credits, of which at least 90 must be at Level 5 or above), but does not progress into 5

6 Stage 3, or if the candidate fails to obtain a degree after the Stage 3 assessment and does not retrieve the failure A Foundation Degree will be awarded if a student successfully completes 240 credits, of which at least 90 must be at Level 5 of an approved Foundation degree programme. Alternatively the student may transfer with academic guidance, to an appropriate Bachelor degree within the University of Greenwich or the University of Kent BSc (Ordinary). A candidate who completes Stages 1-3 of full-time study on the MPharm programme, (at least 300 credits, of which at least 180 credits must be at level 5 or above, including at least 60 at Level 6), but does not progress into the final year may be eligible for the award of a BSc degree Pharmaceutical Studies, or may be permitted to undertake additional courses in order to qualify for a BSc (Hons) degree (to be determined), subject to the appropriate regulations of that programme. This is a terminal award and the student will not be allowed entry into Stage 4 of the MPharm programme BSc (Hons). A candidate who successfully completes stages 1-3 of full-time study on the MPharm programme, (at least 360 credits, of which at least 210 credits must be at level 5 or above, including at least 90 at Level 6 or above), but does not progress into, or complete, the final year may be eligible for the award of a BSc (Hons) degree Pharmaceutical Studies, or may be permitted to undertake additional courses in order to qualify for a BSc (Hons) degree (to be determined), subject to the appropriate regulations of that programme. This is a terminal award and the student will not be allowed entry into Stage 4 of the MPharm programme An MPharm will be awarded if a student successfully completes 480 credits with at least 90 credits at level 5, 120 credits at Level 6 and 120 credits at Level It should be noted that the MPharm is the only recognised qualification that will allow registration with the regulatory body for Pharmacy Once a recommendation for award has been approved on behalf of Senate, the graduand will be invited to attend the Joint Awards Ceremony. 6. Minimum and Maximum Registration Periods The period of registration normally permitted for programmes shall be: Minimum Maximum Certificate of Higher Education 1 year 2 years Diploma of Higher Education 2 years 6 years Foundation Degree 2 years 6 years Honours Degree (Full-time) 3 years 8years MPharm (Full-time) 4 years 6 years These time limits include any period of intermission and any period of time in which a student is repeating part of the programme of study and apply to both full time and part time students. The MPharm degree must be completed within 6 years to be recognised by the regulatory body for registration purposes. 6

7 7. Compensation, Condonement, Referral and Deferral 7.1 Compensation A student who fails up to 25% of the credits for a stage may receive compensation for that failure and be awarded credits for the module, at the discretion of the Board of Examiners, provided that they have a good overall performance, normally defined as an average stage mark of 50% or more, and provided that there is evidence to show that the programme learning outcomes have been achieved and the mark for any individual module is within five percentage points of the pass mark. (i.e. the achievement of a mark in the range 35%-39%) The marks achieved for such modules will not be adjusted but transcripts will indicate modules for which credits have been awarded via compensation Compensation is not permitted in relation to MPharm courses PP1 to PP4 which relate to pharmacy practice, law and ethics as these courses have a 50% pass mark as required by the regulatory body. 7.2 Condonement If a candidate fails a module due to illness or other mitigating circumstances, the Board of Examiners may refer the student to the next assessment opportunity or condone the failure and award credits for the module up to a limit of 25% of a stage of a programme of study, (30 credits for a year of full-time study), provided that: There is evidence to show the programme learning outcomes have been achieved, and provided the student has submitted written medical or other evidence to substantiate any claim of illness or other mitigating circumstances. This process follows the criteria for concession claim procedures as required by the PAU The marks achieved for such modules will not be adjusted to take account of the mitigating circumstances but transcripts will indicate modules for which credits have been awarded via condonement Condonement is not permitted in relation to MPharm courses PP1 to PP4 which relate to pharmacy practice, law and ethics as these courses have a 50% pass mark as required by the regulatory body A student cannot be condoned or compensated for more than 60 credits across the MPharm programme. 7.3 Referral Where a student has not achieved the learning outcomes of a stage of the programme, the Board of Examiners may permit further assessment in failed modules. The Board will specify which elements of assessment the student is required to undertake. The Board may prescribe whatever form of assessment it considers suitable for the circumstances of the case in order to ensure that there is sufficient evidence to support the judgement that the programme learning outcomes have been achieved. 7

8 7.3.2 Where a student is required to be reassessed in a module, this will normally take place at the next available opportunity, and before progressing to the next stage of the programme. Students will not be permitted to carry trailing credits Subject to the specified requirements for a Stage, only two attempts per module will normally be permitted. However at the discretion of the Board of Examiners and in exceptional circumstances, one further attempt may be permitted Where a student is deemed academically indolent (has failed more than 2 modules and attained an overall stage mark of less than 30%), the student will normally be required to withdraw from the programme The Board of Examiners shall not unreasonably withhold permission for a student to be reassessed. However, if it is established that a student has cheated or otherwise attempted to gain an unfair advantage the Board may fail the student without the opportunity of reassessment A student for reassessment should not be able to demand to be reassessed in elements that are no longer current. The Board of Examiners may, at its discretion, make such special arrangements as it deems appropriate in cases where it is impracticable for students to be reassessed in the same elements and by the same methods as at the first attempt. 7.4 Threshold Marks A student is required to achieve a minimum threshold mark of 35% of the total marks available (45% for pharmacy practice modules) in each individual part (coursework and examination) of the summative assessments for a module. 7.5 Deferral If the Board of Examiners agrees that a student has provided the Board with sufficient evidence as to why an examination or assessment has been missed or a poor mark attained, then the Board can recommend that the student be allowed to resit the assessment or examination without penalty. 8. Coursework 8.1 Submission of Late Coursework If coursework is received later than the deadline specified, a mark of zero will be recorded for that work. Where the work is later submitted, and a concessionary plea is made, the Chair of the Board of Examiners shall decide whether a prima facie case exists and, if he/she so decides, the work shall be marked in the normal manner. 8.2 Coursework capping policy 8

9 Failure by a student to meet the required 80% attendance for practical and workshop sessions within a module, without valid reasons of extenuation, will normally result in a capped coursework mark of 40% or 50% for pharmacy practice modules. 9. Foundation Degree Stage A student will be required to gain 120 credits of which at least 30 credits must be at Level 5. Levels are defined within the University of Kent Credit Framework for Taught Programmes: Annex 2 and applied by the Student Data System (SDS). 9.2 The summative assessment requirements at Stage 1 will be dictated by the nature of the modules studied. Each module has a discrete assessment requirement that will enable the Board of Examiners to determine whether or not a student has achieved the learning outcomes for that module. 9.3 Credits will be awarded for those courses in which a mark of 40% (or 50% for PP1) of the total marks available from the summative assessments has been achieved by meeting the learning outcomes of the module. 10. Foundation Degree Stage A student will be required to gain 120 credits of which at least 60 must be at Level 5. Levels are defined within the University of Kent Credit Framework for Taught Programmes: Annex 2 and applied by the Student Data System (SDS) The summative assessment requirements at Stages 1 and 2 will be dictated by the nature of the modules studied. Each module has a discrete assessment requirement that will enable the Board of Examiners to determine whether or not a student has achieved the learning outcomes for that module Credits will be awarded for those modules in which a mark of 40% of the total marks available from the summative assessments has been achieved by meeting the learning outcomes of the module. 11 MPharm Stage A student will be required to gain 120 credits of which at least 90 must be Level 4 or above. The 120 credits must normally include credits for all Stage 1 core courses. Levels are defined within the University of Kent Credit Framework for Taught Programmes: Annex 2 and applied by the Student Data System (SDS) Stage 1 is qualifying in nature and the summative assessment results will not contribute towards the classification of the final award The summative assessment requirements at Stage 1 will be dictated by the nature of the modules studied. Each module has a discrete assessment requirement that will enable the Board of Examiners to determine whether or not a student has achieved the learning outcomes for that module. 9

10 11.4 Credits will be awarded for those modules in which a mark of at least 40% (or 50% for course PP1 on the MPharm programme) of the total marks available from the summative assessments has been achieved by meeting the learning outcomes of the module. 12. MPharm Stage A student will be required to gain 120 credits of which at least 90 must be Level 5 or above. The 120 credits must normally include credits for all Stage 2 core modules The summative assessment requirements at Stage 2 will be dictated by the nature of the modules studied. Each module has a discrete assessment requirement that will enable the Board of Examiners to determine whether or not a student has achieved the learning outcomes for that module Credits will be awarded for those modules in which at least 40% of the total marks available (or 50% for module PP2 on the MPharm programme) from the summative assessments has been achieved, by meeting the learning outcomes of the module. In order to progress to Stage 3 of the MPharm programme, students must normally obtain 240 credits by passing appropriate modules at Stages 1 and The summative assessment results for Stage 2 will contribute 10% towards the classification of the final award. The results will be reviewed by the External Examiners. 13. MPharm Stage A student will be required to gain 120 credits of which 90 credits must be at Level 6 or above. The 120 credits must normally include credits for all Stage 3 core modules The summative assessment requirements at Stage 3 will be dictated by the nature of the modules studied. Each module has a discrete assessment requirement that will enable the Board of Examiners to determine whether or not a student has fulfilled the objectives of that module Credits will be awarded for those modules in which at least 40% of the total marks available (or 50% for course PP3 on the MPharm programme) from the summative assessments has been achieved, by meeting the learning outcomes of the module The summative assessments at Stage 3 will contribute 40% towards the classification of the final award. The results will be reviewed by the External Examiners A student who fails modules up to a maximum value of 60 credits at the completion of Stage 3 may be considered for the award of a BSc (Non-Honours) Pharmaceutical Studies. This will be considered as a terminal award and the student will not be allowed entry into Stage 4 of the MPharm programme In cases where a student fails modules to a value of more than 60 credits at the first attempted completion of Stage 3, s/he may be required to transfer, with academic 10

11 guidance, to an appropriate BSc programme offered within the University of Greenwich (UoG) or the University of Kent (UoK). 14. MPharm Stage A student will be required to gain 120 credits of which at least 120 credits must be at Level The summative assessment requirements at Stage 4 will be dictated by the nature of the modules studied. Each module has a discrete assessment requirement that will enable the Board of Examiners to determine whether or not a student has fulfilled the objectives of that module Subject to the requirements of 7.4.1, credits will be awarded for modules in which at least 40% of the total marks available (or 50% for the PP4 module on the MPharm programme) from the summative assessments has been achieved, by meeting the learning outcomes of the module The summative assessments at Stage 4 will contribute 50% towards the classification of the final award. The results will be moderated by the External Examiners In cases where a student fails modules to a value of more than 20 credits at the first attempted completion of Stage 4, the Board of Examiners will take into account the degree of failure before deciding that, either: (a) Or (b) The student should be re-assessed in the failed modules in a manner determined by the Board; The student should be awarded the BSc (Hons) Pharmaceutical Studies to be determined, (having made good any deficiencies in the requirements for this award) Students shall normally have an opportunity for reassessment once only, to be completed within two years of the original failure. Students who fail on reassessment may be required to leave the programme, unless the Board of Examiners, at its discretion, allows a further re-assessment in a manner and at a date, which it shall determine. 15. Examination Regulations for the Award of the MPharm (Pharmacy) Degree Candidates who meet the requirements to pass Stage 4 will be eligible for the award of the MPharm (Pharmacy). The classifications for the MPharm will follow those for a BSc (Hons) degree: First Class Honours 70% and above Upper Second Class Honours 60% - 69% Lower Second Class Honours 50% - 59% Third Class Honours 40% - 49% 11

12 15.1 It must be noted that the award of an Aegrotat degree is NOT recognised for registration purposes by The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. 16. Examination Regulations for the Award of Foundation Degrees The classifications for the Foundation Degrees will be as follows: Pass 40-59% Merit 60-69% Distinction 70% 17. Accreditation of Prior Certificated and Experiential Learning (APL/APEL) Approval of accreditation of prior learning will follow the procedures of the PAU. 18. Direct Entry onto the MPharm Programme Consideration for direct entry to the programme is dependent on grades achieved by a student on a current programme. All direct entry applications will be scrutinised by the Programme Leader and/or the academic admissions tutor prior to the offer of a place on the Programme. References: The University of Kent Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes of Study Credit Framework for Taught Programmes Academic Discipline Procedures External Examiners Concessions Applications and Appeals against Recommendations of Boards of Examiners Standing orders on Academic Review Procedures 12