Department Annual Report & Program Review

Transcription

1 Department Annual Report & Program Review Department: Radiologic Technology Program Document Prepared By: Deb Nordman Julie Lackscheide

2 Department Information Annual Updates Review & Documentation: Current year goals 1. Complete Academic Program Review The Academic Program Review process is completed. Goal successfully met. 2. New classroom and lab refinement Scenarios gained through our 2013 Clinical Instructor Retreat were implemented regarding our new Radiology rooms and the c arm using the new phantom. Several new additions to our laboratory allowed us to improve teaching effectiveness. The three new upright simulation buckeys and the five simulation tables allow us to observe and assist students as they practice in an open area. All laboratory image testing is now performed on the additional four computers we received for the new laboratory. The additional space allows us to now hold laboratory and lecture classes at the same time. This greatly enhances our scheduling abilities. 3. Online course development of GH 111 The online course development of GH 111 has been approves and will be completed the first summer session of Revise CLEP test for GH 110 The CLEP test for GH 110 has been completed, reviewed, and implemented. 5. Plan and implement Clinical Instructor Retreat The Clinical Instructor Retreat is an eight hour meeting with all of our clinical site instructors. During this meeting, we work on updates and/or improvements to the program. These improvements/updates have included the building of scenarios specific to difficult concepts and exams, standardized technique chart, implementation of second shift schedules, audio conference with our new online documentation program (Trajecsys), and updating our clinical competency environments. We are very grateful for our clinical instructor s willingness to complete this work. The meeting is held off campus, lunch is provided, and a team building activity is performed in the afternoon. 6. Attend AEIRS Conference Providence, RI The AEIRS (Association of Educators in Imaging and Radiologic Sciences) Conference was attended in July of 2014 by Julie Lackscheide and Deb Nordman in Providence, RI. Each received 10.5 continuing education credits. 7. Attend RSNA with first and second year students The RSNA (Radiological Society of North America) conference was attended in December of 2014 by first year students, second year students, Deb Nordman, and Julie Lackscheide. This is the largest medical conference in the world. Program officials rent a charter bus and leave the college at 7 am and return at 11 pm.

3 Goals for next year 1. Implement Trajecsys (online documentation program) for clinical education 2. Incorporate C arm education (New Equipment) into RT 110 Lab 3. Recording of existing scenario laboratory work 4. Introduce new infant phantom into laboratory courses 5. Plan and implement Clinical Instructor Retreat 6. Attend RSNA with first and second year students 7. Attend AEIRS Conference San Antonio, TX Internal collaborations and partnerships Occupational Therapy Assisting students worked with Rad Tech students to inform them of proper weight and distribution of backpacks. Culinary students came to the Radiology Department to help host the Bone Buddies Toy Clinic. Rad Tech students created activities for children regarding radiology and the study of bones, while the Culinary students provided supplies and skills needed for decorating skeleton cookies. Additionally, radiology students worked with job training for their academic service learning. External collaborations and partnerships The Bone Buddies Bone Clinic invited the Pre k students from the David D. Hunting YMCA to our Radiology Lab. Children participated in a variety of activities presented by GRCC s Rad Tech and Culinary students. Additionally, our second year students performed academic service learning through Habitat for Humanity. Also, Radiology students spoke at Kent Career and Technical Center regarding the field of Radiology. All students participated in the 100 Years of Giving Project. Students collected 100 items of winter clothing that were later donated to Mel Trotter Ministries. The Rad Tech department sends its students to five area hospitals for clinical rotations. We enjoy an excellent relationship with each of the sites. They are as follows: Mercy Health Grand Rapids, Spectrum Health Blodgett, Metro Health Grand Rapids, Spectrum Health Zeeland and Holland Hospital. Departmental needs for support from other departments within the college The department will need educational media support this summer regarding our recording media for the quantum radiography room. We will also need IT support for our new ipads and software applications. We will be beginning to move our current clinical forms from paper to an online format using Trajecsys. This may require additional IT support. We are working to obtain new clinical sites and will need the continued support from the Vice President. We will also need the Vice President s support regarding faculty pay for clinical credits. Program accreditation Updates In our last accreditation (2010) through the Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology (JRCERT), we received the highest award of eight

4 years. Last year (2014) we completed a successful interim report which maintains our accreditation until Description of departmental advising plan and outcomes Advising sessions are provided to prospective and enrolled students interested in learning more about the GRCC Radiologic Technology Program. Students may attend these sessions on a walk in basis and will be able to speak directly to a Radiologic Technology faculty member in 502 College Park Plaza. Sessions will be available during the fall and winter semesters at the following times: June 17, AM 12 PM July 15, PM 2 PM September 25, PM 3 PM October 23, PM 3 PM November 24, AM 12 PM January 20, AM 1 PM February 18, AM 1 PM March 11, AM 11 AM April 22, AM 11 AM June 16, AM 12 AM July 07, 11:30 AM 1:30 PM Academic advising days typically included three to 10 students per session. One of the winter sessions included a counseling representative, Karen Murphy. We would like to continue to include a counseling representative once in each semester. Although these scheduled advising days are helpful to students, we spend a great deal of time advising students on a spontaneous one to one basis. In addition to that, we participate in health career visitations from local high schools. We also had representation at several health career fairs. The Program Director also attends a Counseling department meeting and the Enrollment Center s department meeting to keep all parties up to date. Departmental professional development activities The Association of Educators in Imaging Radiologic Sciences (AEIRS) conference and Radiologic Society of North America (RSNA) conference are attended yearly by both full time

5 Rad Tech faculty. The AEIRS conference provides us with current educational tools and concepts. The RSNA is the largest medical conference in the world. Faculty are introduced to state of theart equipment and technology for use in the field of Radiography. Both full time Radiologic Technology faculty also, remain current in the field by completing directed readings through the American Society of Radiologic Technologists. The Program Director works with all second year students each summer to remain current with the clinical sites equipment. Student Awards Stacy Holtsclaw and Jonathan Gritter both received Radiologic Technology scholarships for the academic year. Stacy Holtsclaw also received the Delta Pi Alpha award for her academic success. Other department updates We are adding an additional RT 100 Introduction to Patient Care and Radiologic Sciences. We are adding this course to improve student readiness. This past year we have updated eight courses through the new Curriculog system. Through this process, we have revised outcomes and updated content. Additionally, the Rad Tech Program has updated their prerequisite requirement for BI 121 and BI 122. We will be following the Biology Department s lead by requiring a C or better instead of C. This change will allow students to transfer the course to higher institutions. The Rad Tech Department faculty are a very cohesive unit. We work very well together and resolve problems efficiently. Evaluation Questions: 1. Were the department goals for this year successfully met? Please explain. Yes, the department goals for this year have been successfully met. See review and documentation for current year goals above. 2. Is the Advising Plan working well? What have the outcomes been for student advising? Yes, the advising plan is working well. Students have been very receptive to the scheduled advising days and students have not requested additional time. We feel that this is due to our flexibility with advising and meeting students needs immediately. See outcomes above. Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Annual Goals Yes No External Collaborations & Partnerships Yes No

6 Internal Collaborations & Partnerships Yes No Accreditation Yes No Departmental Advising Yes No Faculty & Staff Annual Updates Review & Documentation: Faculty Credentials & Certifications Faculty & Staff All four faculty members are Registered Radiologic Technologists and three of the four have their master s degrees, while the fourth is working to complete their degree. All faculty are also members of the ASRT. The two full time faculty are members of AEIRS. Professional Development Activities This past year we have updated eight courses through the new Curriculog system. Through this process, we have revised outcomes and updated content. Additionally, the Rad Tech Program has updated their prerequisite requirement for BI 121 and BI 122. We will be following the Biology Department s lead by requiring a C or better instead of C. This change will allow students to transfer the course to higher institutions. Perkins: The Association of Educators in Imaging Radiologic Sciences (AEIRS) conference is attended yearly by both full time Rad Tech faculty. This conference provides us with current educational tools and concepts. The Clinical Instructor Retreat focused on the implementation of second shift rotations for first year students. Clinical instructors brought a potential template for implementation and hours needed to meet the JRCERT requirements. We also held a phone conference with a representative from Trajecsys. This is an online documentation storage company. The representative covered all aspects of the program and how to implement. We will be working with him this summer regarding the forms that will be implemented. Every year, this is the time we used to review and revise current policies. EOL/Release Time Work EOL release time work included the following: Maintaining and distributing clinical forms to students and clinical instructors. All clinic forms have been posted on a program wide Blackboard page. Update clinical handbook. The clinical handbook was updated based on decisions that were made in the Fall Clinical Instructor Retreat.

7 Maintaining and distributing clinical forms to students and clinical instructors. Creating a general Rad Tech Student page on Blackboard to upload all student documents. Communicating with clinical instructors on a regular basis. Clinical instructor a Skype Consortium meeting January 30, 2014 due to weather Set up MRI interview team for February and updated application forms Reviewed all MRI applications and calculated packets Coordinated interview dates with students and staff Interviewed all seven candidates, accepted four students for 2014/15 cohort Planned and hosted Orientation for all students and MRI Consortium Members Updated MRI website access to Blackboard. GH 110 and GH 111 have been approved for Curriculog. A GH Department meeting was held on Wednesday, January 7, 2015 from 10:30 11:30 Jennifer Riggs has completed her first course of GH 111. The semester has gone very well. Mary Godfrey will develop the online GH 111 course in the summer of A new Clep test was developed by Matt Mekkes for GH 110. Received approval for Mary Godfrey to develop an online course for pay. GH 110 and 111 are current in Curriculog. Jennifer Riggs is preparing for GH 111 Winter semester Fall department meeting August 20, 2014 Increased online delivery and instruction Updated the GRCC Admission flyer Changed the admissions application date to an earlier time (October 1, 2014) MRI meeting at KCC, see minutes Offered to have Julie teach the Cross Sectional Imaging course Updated website information per JRCERT Increased advising times Faculty & Staff Accomplishments/Awards Our accomplishments are as follows: Move the entire department from the second floor to the third floor of the Cook Building. Completed in service regarding operation of all new equipment. Manage completion of punch list. Successful Bone Buddies Clinic (external collaboration with the YMCA of Grand Rapids and internal collaboration with the Culinary Department). Completed Backpack Training for all first year students (internal collaboration with OTA).

8 One hundred clothing items to Warm Your Bones were collected for the 100 year anniversary and donated to Mel Trotter Ministries. Completed Service Learning with Habitat for Humanity (external collaboration) and Work Training (internal collaboration). Orientation meeting for all students and college representatives in the MiRIS (Michigan Radiology Imaging Services) Consortium. Clinical Instructor Retreat Faculty Development for Upcoming Year Rad Tech Department will need the following: In service regarding the upgrade to the Fuji processor. Follow up in service regarding laboratory media service. May need IT support regarding move to online data storage program. Evaluation Questions: 1. Can course assignments be made and scheduled based on the availability of credentialed faculty? Yes, course assignments can be made and scheduled based on the availability of credentialed faculty. 2. Is the number of departmental faculty that are certified to teach online and through Academic Service Learning sufficient to achieve the curricular and delivery needs of the department? Yes, the number of departmental faculty that are certified to teach online and through Academic Service Learning is sufficient to achieve the curricular and delivery needs of the department. Both full time faculty are online certified. 3. Do the number and ratio of Full time/adjunct faculty support the goals of the department? Yes, the number and ratio of Full time/adjunct faculty support the goals of the department. However, we have no backup faculty should someone be ill or unable to work for any reason. We are in the process of searching for an additional adjunct. 4. Is the professional development faculty and staff are receiving sufficient for them to maintain currency in their field and area(s) of expertise? Yes, the professional development received by faculty and staff is sufficient to remain current in their fields of expertise.

9 5. Are additional faculty or faculty development resources needed to support the goals of the department over the next four years? Yes, we are searching for an additional adjunct faculty. Faculty development resources are not needed at this time. Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Faculty credentialing Yes No Faculty online certification Yes No Academic Service Learning Yes No Ratio Fulltime/Adjunct faculty Yes No Faculty professional development Yes No Resources Yes No

10 Radiologic Technology, A.A.A.S. Mission/Purpose, Target Audience & Admissions/Pre Requisite Skills Mission/Purpose Review & Documentation: As part of our Accreditation process our Mission Statement and Program Goals were reviewed by the Advisory Board in February 2013 and recorded, updated and approved in November of These documents are reviewed to ensure alignment with the GRCC Mission Statement and the requirement of our accrediting body. PREVIOUS MISSION STATEMENT: The mission of the Grand Rapids Community College Radiologic Technology Program is to demonstrate radiographic skills, critical thinking skills, communication skills, apply radiation safety, patient care, professional attitudes, and lifelong learning characteristics that will prepare students for entry into the workforce of diagnostic medical imaging as a registry eligible radiographer. CURRENT MISSION STATEMENT: The mission of the Grand Rapids Community College Radiologic Technology Program is to educate students in radiographic, critical thinking, and communication skills, while applying radiation safety, patient care, professional attitudes, and lifelong learning characteristics that will prepare students for entry into the workforce of diagnostic medical imaging as a registry eligible radiographer. PREVIOUS PROGRAM GOALS: Program Goals Upon completion of the Radiologic Technology Program at Grand Rapids Community College, the student will be able to: Goal #1 Students will demonstrate critical thinking abilities when solving clinical problems Goal #2 Students will demonstrate appropriate communication skills. Goal #3 The student/graduates will be clinically competent. Goal #4 Students will demonstrate professional growth and development. CURRENT PROGRAM GOALS: Upon completion of the Radiologic Technology Program at Grand Rapids Community College, the student will be able to: Goal #1 Demonstrate critical thinking abilities when solving clinical problems. Goal #2 Demonstrate appropriate communication skills. Goal #3 Apply radiation safety principles when performing radiographic procedures. Goal #4 Demonstrate professional behaviors. AAAS/Certificate Programs

11 GRCC MISSION STATEMENT: GRCC is an open access college that prepares individuals to attain their goals and contribute to the community. Evaluation Question: Does the purpose/mission statement clearly identify why the program exists, and how it prepares students? As described above our Mission Statement and Program Goals clearly defines why the program exists and how it prepares students for their role in the community. Target Audience & Program Admission Review & Documentation: Starting with the fall 2014 semester, the Rad Tech department has updated the curriculum to align with Michigan Transfer Agreement (MTA) requirements by including a humanities course in the program. Additionally, we will require students to obtain a C instead of a C for Biology 121 and Biology 122. Our admission standards must coincide with our national accrediting body the Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology (JRCERT). Students wishing to pursue the Radiologic Technology Program must complete the following admission requirements: The student will provide the following to the Admission s Office: A completed GRCC application designating Radiologic Technology A copy of their high school transcript designating 2.0 GPA or higher*, or GED and college transcript *Students who do not have a 2.0 GPA at the high school and/or college level will be asked to take the following courses: MA 098 Math for College Students RD 097 Introduction to College Reading or RD 098 College Reading PY 101 Learning to Adjust to College EN 097 Academic Foundations English I **Biology course must have a lab component; BI 103 General Botany is not acceptable Completion of one year of high school algebra with a grade of C or better Completion of the GRCC mathematics assessment test & score at least 80% Completion of the GRCC reading assessment test score at least at the 12 th grade level Earn a grade of C or higher in BI121 & BI122. (Effective Fall 2015) In order to be eligible for graduation, Radiologic Technology students must: earn a minimum cumulative GPA of 2.0 in the prescribed Radiologic Technology curriculum. AAAS/Certificate Programs

12 Demographics of Students in Program, Fall 2010 to Fall Radiologic Technology % Female 64% 76% 69% 62% 64% % Male 36% 24% 31% 38% 36% % Fulltime 7% 6% 2% 2% 50% % Parttime 93% 94% 98% 98% 50% Average Age % American Indian 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% % Asian 0% 2% 2% 4% 5% % Black 0% 4% 4% 4% 2% % Hispanic 5% 4% 0% 4% 7% % White 93% 85% 90% 86% 86% % Unknown 2% 6% 4% 2% 0% Evaluation Questions: 1. Has the target audience for the program been identified? Is the program attracting and appropriately serving the target audience? GRCC s Radiologic Technology Program continues to attract a diverse population of students. 2. Does the program composition (demographics) reflect the defined target population(s)? Why or why not? Within our program from years 2010 to 2014, we have had a 10% minority representation. This however does not reflect the diversity of the Kent Intermediate School District. Every year, the RT Program does enroll a large percentage of nontraditional (male) students. 3. If there are admissions criteria, academic standards, or assessment requirements for the program, are they appropriate and do they facilitate program and student success (based on your review of external data and course success data)? As noted above, we have outlined the admissions criteria for the RT Program. The program currently has an 89% completion rate and a 93.3% national certification five year averages. Our benchmark for program completion is 75% and the benchmark for national certification is 85%. 4. Are changes to the admissions or waitlist processes needed? Our waitlist is currently three to four years. Increasing the number of clinic placements each year would help decrease this wait time. We currently are taking 23 students each fall. We are the only open door Radiologic Technology Program in Western Michigan; all others have a competitive application process. AAAS/Certificate Programs

13 Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Mission/Purpose Yes No Target Audience Yes No Program Admissions Yes No Program Enrollment & Student Progress Review & Documentation: New Student Enrollment Program Data The program is restricted to accepting students based on the number of clinical sites available for placement. We have recently lost one clinical site (2013) due to contract negotiation issues. This meant a decline of three available placement sites. In addition, two of our sites asked to reduce their student numbers by one. We are now accepting 23 students each fall. Our accrediting body also requires 75% of our graduating class to be employed within twelve months of graduation. Currently our wait list remains at approximately three to four years. *The Rad Tech Program will not have new student enrollment since every student has been on the wait list for approximately two to three years and must complete the Biology courses prior to being placed on the wait list. Plan New Students (First Time in Any College) New Student Enrollment by Program, Fall 2010 to Fall 2014 Description Radiologic Technology Total Student Enrollment Total Workforce Development 1,273 1,198 1,170 1,100 1,042 Total student enrollment from 2010 to 2014 has declined for the following reasons: Due to the economy, our student employment rates declined. At this time, our accreditation required a 75% employment rate per year (It is now a five year average). Student enrollment was lowered to match employment. In 2013, the program lost North Ottawa Community Hospital due to a contract issue. Three clinical sites requested to take one student less in 2013 and AAAS/Certificate Programs

14 Plan Description Enrollment by Program, Fall 2010 to Fall Radiologic Technology Student Progress Total Workforce Development 7,530 7,202 7,094 6,876 6,761 The Rad Tech student Retention/Graduation rate for this group (2013/2014) is at 90%. This is a successful rate for all intents and purposes. However, this data does not drill down to the specifics of our student population. We have both first and second year students attending. Some students have stopped out while others have returned. We have consistently maintained a high retention/graduation rate as required by a benchmark of 75% for our accreditation. Student Progress Plan Code Description N Students Graduated Graduated/ Transferred Transferred Still Here Left Ed Grad/Transfer/ Still Here 305 Radiologic Technology % Total Workforce Development 9, ,091 4,132 3,851 60% Number of Graduates by Year Academic Year Plan Description Radiologic Technology Total Workforce Development Evaluation Questions: 1. Is the program consistently attracting new students? As demonstrated by our three to four year wait list, the RT Program is consistently attracting new students. 2. Is the enrollment trend meeting established targets, ensuring program viability? If targets for enrollment have not been established, what should they be? What could be done to increase enrollment (if this is found to be necessary)? The waitlist currently fulfills our 23 spots during enrollment each fall. Our target for enrollment could be increased if we were able to establish additional clinical placements as stated prior. 3. Do students appear to be progressing through the program well? Are there concerns in this area? AAAS/Certificate Programs

15 Perkins Data In the last two years, we have had a decrease in completion rate by approximately an average of 19%. We are tracking this trend, but for the majority of these withdrawals they were due to personal reasons, not academic or non interest. 4. Is the yearly ratio of the number of students enrolled to the number of graduates appropriate given program goals? Why or why not? Even though our number of student withdrawals has slightly increased over the past two years, we are still meeting our 75% benchmark requirement for accreditation. Review & Documentation: Performance Levels CORE INDICATOR (Perkins IV) State Performance Level Expected Program Met Standard? 1P1: % of CTE concentrators who passed technical skill assessments that are aligned with industry-recognized standards, if available and appropriate, during the reporting year (that can be identified - *2P1: % of CTE concentrators who received an industry-recognized credential, a certificate, or a degree during the reporting year. 3P1: % of CTE concentrators who remained enrolled in their original postsecondary institution or transferred to another 2- or 4- year postsecondary institution during the reporting year and who were enrolled in postsecondary education in the fall of the previous reporting year. 92% 96% YES 29% 97.50% YES 71% 96.67% YES AAAS/Certificate Programs

16 4P1: % of CTE concentrators who were placed or retained in employment, or placed in military service or apprenticeship programs in the 2nd quarter following the program year in which they left postsecondary education (i.e., unduplicated placement status for CTE concentrators who graduated by June 30, 2008 would be assessed between October 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008). 5P1: % of CTE participants from underrepresented gender groups who participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year. 5P2: % of CTE concentrators from underrepresented gender groups who completed a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year. 71% 100% YES 23.70% 38.29% YES 20.70% 33.33% YES PERKINS: Student Participation in Nontraditional Fields 5P1: GRCC s Radiologic Technology Program has traditionally had a large representation of male students participate in the program. PERKINS: Credential, Certificate, or Degree Attainment 2P1: GRCC s Radiologic Technology Program is consistently above the state benchmark of 29% with a 97.5%. PERKINS: Student Completion in Nontraditional Fields 5P2: Of the large male population within the RT Program, we consistently meet the state performance benchmark of the core indicator. PERKINS: Student Placement 4P1: The program must maintain a 75% five year average placement rate to remain compliant with accreditation. The five year average from 2009 through 2013 was 79.5%. This number reflects the poor economy in previous years, and has improved immensely since AAAS/Certificate Programs

17 PERKINS: Student Retention and Transfer 3P1: As illustrated above, GRCC s Radiologic Technology Program is always above the states benchmark of 71% with an 88.4%. PERKINS: Technical 1P1: as illustrated in the above table, for the past five years, GRCC s Radiologic Technology Program has been above the state performance level which is summarized in category 1P1. PERKINS: Skills Attainment 1P1: As shown above, GRCC s Radiologic Technology Program has been above the state performance level which is summarized as one category in 1P1. Evaluation Questions: 1. To what extent are the targets for core program indicators (Student Participation in Nontraditional fields, Student Retention & Transfer, Credential, Certificate, Degree Attainment, Student Completion in non traditional fields, Student Placement, Technical Skills Attainment) being met? Course Data All of the Perkins Core Indicators are at or above state levels consistently. 2. Are the various sub populations meeting the targets at the same rate? Due to the fact that the data did not represent the Perkin s Core Indicators, our assessment was completed by program faculty. This general assessment demonstrated very little difference between race and gender. It has been our experience that those individuals that have withdrawn from our program have been older students and/or students who have not attended classes for many years. Review & Documentation: The following information refers to the course data that was provided in the course data packet. One factor that should be addressed regarding the data is the grading scale. The grading scale that is used within the program is not the standard grading scale for the college, and not the grading scale that is believed to be provided in the report (A=92 100, B=90 84, and C=75 83). This data does outline all courses, including summer, that are within the program however, the data does not appear to be accurate. For example, in RT 232, it states that 96% of students passed that course; however, there were zero withdrawals. Further clarification regarding withdrawals verses failing would be helpful to determine decline in enrollment from course to course. AAAS/Certificate Programs

18 Course Enrollment by Semester Overall, course enrollment in all RT courses remains high and very consistent, as shown in the table. Even though curriculum has evolved and continues with increased difficulty, there is consistent enrollment through the duration of the program. Departmental meetings discuss retention and strategies for improvement are discussed in monthly meetings. Course Success Rates As stated above, successful passing rates within the program data are not clearly defined. There is a discrepancy between the grading scale used and the RT Program scale. Based on our program effectiveness data, the program has a five year average (see below) completion rate of 90.6%. While this data does not break down the enrollment success for each course, it does accurately define how many students complete the program. Additionally the enrollment numbers in this data set do not appear to be accurate. Program Effectiveness Data Year # of Students # of Students Enrolled Completing Percent % % % % % AAAS/Certificate Programs

19 II. Course Data A. Historical Course Enrollment and Success (Earned Grades* by Course, by Year) 1. Summary Course Enrollment A to C Withdrew Enrollment A to C Withdrew Enrollment A to C Withdrew Enrollment A to C Withdrew RT % 0% % 0% 28 96% 0% % 0% RT % 0% 27 96% 0% 28 89% 0% % 0% RT % 0% % 0% 28 96% 0% % 0% RT % 4% % 0% % 0% 24 96% 4% RT % 4% % 0% % 0% 24 96% 4% RT % 4% 24 96% 0% % 0% 24 88% 4% RT % 0% 27 96% 0% % 0% % 0% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% 24 96% 4% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% 24 96% 4% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% 24 96% 4% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% % 0% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% % 0% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% % 0% RT % 0% % 0% 23 96% 0% 25 96% 4% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% % 0% RT % 0% 27 96% 0% 26 96% 0% MRI No course history available yet. Total GRCC 72% 13% 72% 12% 74% 11% 74% 8% *Does not include I (Incomplete), D or E AAAS/Certificate Programs

20 Demographics of Students in Program, Fall 2010 to Fall Radiologic Technology % Female 64% 76% 69% 62% 64% % Male 36% 24% 31% 38% 36% % Fulltime 7% 6% 2% 2% 50% % Parttime 93% 94% 98% 98% 50% Average Age % American Indian 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% % Asian 0% 2% 2% 4% 5% % Black 0% 4% 4% 4% 2% % Hispanic 5% 4% 0% 4% 7% % White 93% 85% 90% 86% 86% % Unknown 2% 6% 4% 2% 0% Evaluation Questions: 1. What does the course enrollment by semester data tell you? As discussed above, RT course enrollment remains very high and consistent over the last five years. Slight ups and downs in enrollment could be related to academic performance or personal reasons for withdrawal. 2. Are students passing courses at the appropriate rates? If not, which courses are of concern and what should be done about this? The definition of appropriate rate would be difficult to answer given the Radiologic Technology Program is not structured as other programs within the college. There is one cohort of students that starts each fall, and they proceed through a defined set of sequenced courses. For each student to proceed within the program, they must pass the courses in the prior sequence. If a student withdrawals from the program, they have to wait until that semester starts the next year to re enter. As for any courses that appear to be an issue in success, there are no specific courses that stand out with failing grades. The way that the program is set up accommodates those with personal conflicts to withdrawal from the program and potentially return one year later. This scenario can be difficult due to the fact that students have been out of the program for almost one year. In an effort to alleviate this, the program requires each student who wishes to re enter to develop an action plan regarding what efforts they will take to be successful. The courses that appear to have the highest drop in enrollment are first year courses. These are the first classes taken in the RT Program, therefore some students are finding out they are not able to maintain the high academics and time commitment needed to complete the program. One change that has been made as of summer of 2014, each student will take the RT 100 Introduction to Radiologic Sciences and Patient Care course. We will also, offer an additional RT 100 course starting in fall We are hoping this course will allow the students an earlier opportunity to determine if this program is right for them. AAAS/Certificate Programs

21 3. Are the Course Success Rates the same for the various sub group populations? If not, where are the areas of concern and what should be done about this? Yes, the Course Success Rates are the same for the various sub group populations. Due to our high retention rates, there is little or no significant difference in success rates for each course in the Radiologic Technology Program. Program Outcomes Review & Documentation: Program Outcomes 1. Student will complete the program. 2. Employers will be satisfied with the performance of newly hired technologists. 3. Graduates will be satisfied with their results. 4. Students seeking employment will be gainfully employed within six months postgraduation. 5. Students will pass the national certification examination on the first attempt. Data for Program Outcomes Attached. AAAS/Certificate Programs

22 Program Effectiveness Measures #1 Students will complete the program. #2 Employers will be satisfied with the performance of newly hired technologists. Measurement Tool Benchmark Timeframe Responsible Party Results Graduation roster 75% out of 100% End of program Program Director : 97% : 90% : 81% : 86% Employer Survey Question # out of a 4 point scale 6 months postgraduation (or upon completion by all) Program Director : : NA : : NA #3 Graduates will be satisfied with their results. Graduate Survey Question #8, Section B 3.5 out of a 5 point scale 6 months postgraduation Program Director : : : : NA #4 Students seeking employment will be gainfully employed within 6 months postgraduation. #5 Students will pass the national certification examination on the first attempt. Graduate Survey Question #3 National Certification Exam 1 st time pass rate 75% out of 100% 85% out of 100% 6 months postgraduation 6 months postgraduation (or upon completion by all) Program Director 2009 Grads: 64.2% 2010 Grads: 78.3% 2011 Grads: 80.0% 2012 Grads: 95.0% 2013 Grads: 80.0% 5 yr. Avg = 79.50% Program Director : 96% : 94% : 88% : 95% : 96% 5 yr. Avg = 93.8% AAAS/Certificate Programs

23 Students will complete the program: The current five year average for program completion is 88.4%. Our benchmark for accreditation is greater than or equal to 85%. Employers will be satisfied with the performance of newly hired technologists: Our average for the last four years is 3.53 out of four. The benchmark is greater than or equal to 2.5 on a four point scale. Graduates will be satisfied with their results: Our average for the last four years is 4.18 out of five. The benchmark is greater than or equal to 3.5 on a five point scale. Students seeking employment will be gainfully employed within six months post graduation: The five year average is 79.5% out of 100%. The benchmark is greater than or equal to 75% out of 100%. Starting with 2014, this will be measured at 12 months post graduation. Students will pass the national certification examination on the first attempt: The five year average is 93.8% out of 100%. The benchmark is greater than or equal to 85% out of 100%. The national average pass rate for 2010 to 2014 is 91.3%. We are consistently above the national average for pass rates. Evaluation Questions: 1. Are these Program Outcomes appropriate given the target audience and intent for the program? If not, please list what the new Program Outcomes should be. Yes, the program outcomes are appropriate given the target audience and intent for the program. Students must pass the national registry exam to be employed as a radiographer. We are consistently above the national average for pass rates. 2. What does the data trend for the Program Outcomes tell you? What are the implications for these data? The data trend for the Program Outcomes tells us that students are gaining the knowledge they need to successfully pass the registry exam and gain employment as a registered radiographer. Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: New Student Enrollment Yes No Total Student Enrollment Yes No Student Progress Yes No AAAS/Certificate Programs

24 Student Participation in Nontraditional Fields Yes No Credential, Certificate, or Degree Attainment Yes No Student Completion in Nontraditional Fields Yes No Student Placement Yes No Student Retention and Transfer Yes No Technical Skills Attainment Yes No Course enrollment by semester Yes No Course Success Rates Yes No Program Outcomes Yes No History Program Curriculum Review & Documentation: Revisions within the Radiologic Technology program are performed on course by course basis. Each course is reviewed and revised accordingly, per the CARP/Curriculog schedule. In addition to those scheduled updates, we make additional revisions as needed by our accrediting body, Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology (JRCERT), clinical site feedback, advisory board feedback, technology advancements, and professional development. In our last accreditation (2010), we received the highest award of eight years. Last year (2014) we completed a successful interim report which maintains our accreditation until External Standards & Certifications Review & Documentation: External Standards Our program adheres to our accrediting body, JRCERT, curriculum standards. Challenge Exams There are no challenging exams within the Radiologic Technology Program courses. There is a challenge exam for GH 110 Medical Terminology. Curriculum Crosswalk The curriculum within the Radiologic Technology Program continues to reinforce learning from previous courses. Our accreditation standards are very specific, and we must meet or exceed program goals and student learning outcomes. By completing the curriculum crosswalk, we have documented that every topic from our accrediting body is covered in one or more courses. Equivalent Courses Transfer Institutions Specific Radiologic Technology courses are only transferable as credit to another Radiologic Technology Program. Additionally, several four year colleges will include the Radiologic Technology Curriculum as credit towards undergraduate degrees. AAAS/Certificate Programs

25 Program and Course Certifications The Radiologic Technology Program prepares students to sit for the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists exam, which is a national registry. Evaluation Questions: 1. To what extent is the program curriculum aligned with the K 12 standards? Are the current courses well aligned with the K 12 expectations? Are textbooks and student materials in the initial coursework at the appropriate level given their high school preparation? If there is not alignment, identify the gaps. If there is duplication, secondary to postsecondary, identify the opportunity for articulated credits. We currently do not align the program curriculum with the K 12 standards and expectations. 2. To what extent is the program curriculum aligned with external professional standards (Industry, State, or National)? Are the current courses within the program or discipline appropriately and sufficiently addressing external standards? What changes should be made to ensure alignment? Are new courses needed? Do additional competencies from the standards need to be added or eliminated in courses? Please explain. See above. As demonstrated by the curriculum crosswalk, all courses within the Radiologic Technology Program appropriately and sufficiently address external standards (JRCERT). Program Learning Outcomes Review & Documentation: Program outcomes within the Radiologic Technology Program are identified as program goals in our outcomes assessment plan. Goal 1: Student will demonstrate critical thinking abilities when solving critical problems. Goal 2: Student will demonstrate appropriate communication skills. Goal 3: Student/graduate will be clinically competent. Goal 4: Student will demonstrate professional growth and development. Evaluation Question: 1. Do the Program Learning Outcomes reflect the demonstrable skills, knowledge, and attitudes expected of students by the end of the program? Are they aligned with the standards identified in previous work? Are they clearly stated and measurable? If not, what changes are suggested? Document the revised Program Learning Outcomes here. The program learning outcomes reflect the demonstrable skills, knowledge, and attitudes expected of students by the end of the program. The Radiologic Technology Program learning outcomes (goals) are aligned with accrediting body (JRCERT). The outcomes (goals) are clearly stated and each program outcome (goal) has at least two student outcomes that have specific measurement tools and benchmarks. The program further delineates a AAAS/Certificate Programs

26 time frame for each outcome (goal) and states which program individual is responsible for the data collection. This outcomes assessment plan is reviewed, and revised if necessary, at the end of each academic year and is aligned with our accreditation annual report. The outcomes assessment plan tracks data for over a five year period. The outcomes assessment plan is attached. AAAS/Certificate Programs

27 Outcomes Assessment Plan Radiologic Technology Program Fall Winter 2014 The Radiologic Technology program at Grand Rapids Community College will provide a quality and diverse education that enables our graduates to become a valuable member of the health care team. Goal 1: Student will demonstrate critical thinking abilities when solving clinical problems. Outcome #1 Measurement Tool Benchmark Timeframe Responsible Party Results Student adapts correctly to mobile/trauma radiographic exams. RT 212 Test #2 Trauma/Mobile/Surgery (Radiographic Positioning) RT 232 Average of Mobile Comps (Clinical course specific to mobile/surgical competencies) Average 80% out of 100% Average 80% out of 100% 5 th Semester Didactic Instructor : 93.68% : 83.11% : 88.08% : 93.18% : 91.75% 6 th Semester Clinical Coordinator : 99.4% : 99.6% : 99.2% : 99.5% : 99.8% Outcome #2 Measurement Tool Benchmark Timeframe Responsible Party Results Student modifies exam for non-routine patient (wheelchairs, stretcher, trauma, etc.) RT 100 Test #2 (Orientation to Healthcare-Didactic course/care and communication of patient) RT 131 Clinical Course Final Competency Evaluation (Average of Competencies) Average 80% out of 100% Average 80% out of 100% 1 st Semester Didactic Instructor : 86.00% : 80.07% : 88.42% : 95.19% : 89.82% 6 th semester Clinical Coordinator : 98.64% : 95.47% : 97.97% : 98.05% : NA AAAS/Certificate Programs

28 Action/Analysis Goal 1: SLO 1 Tool 1: There was a small drop in the data over the five years, but the data remains above the benchmark of 80%. This is consistent with their board scores in radiographic positioning. In winter semester 2014, we have made some changes in the curriculum regarding implementing scenarios in trauma, along with dedicating additional time working with the c-arm. The responses from the students have been very positive (See Objective 5.4). SLO 1 Tool 2: Over the five year period, the mobile competency average has remained very high. While this score remains high, we still have students vocalize their lower levels of confidence in surgical exams. To remedy this, we have implemented additional time working with the c-arm (See Objective 5.4). SLO 2 Tool 1: The benchmark of 80% for this course has been consistently met over the five year period with significant increase in the past two years. Patient care and communication has been a routinely high scoring board category. SLO 2 Tool2: The data for RT 131 competencies remains consistently high over the four year period. This data is in alignment with the students' high board scores within patient care and radiographic positioning. AAAS/Certificate Programs

29 Goal 2: Student will demonstrate appropriate communication skills. Outcome #l Measurement Tool Benchmark Timeframe Responsible Party Results Student will be able to RT 210 Lab (Average of Average 80% out of 6 th semester Clinical Coordinator : 98.30% demonstrate effective second year Peer 100% oral communication Positioning Tests) skills *New Tool for Cycle will be: RT rd Peer Positioning Test-Patient Communication Average 80% out of 100% 4 th semester Didactic Instructor : 98.63% : 94.40% : 97.09% : 91.40% Measurement Tool Benchmark Timeframe Responsible Party Results Outcome #2 RT 213 Test #1 Average 80% 5 th semester Didactic Instructor : 88.68% *New Tool for Cycle Average 80% out of 2 nd semester Didactic Instructor : 88.00% will be: RT 100% 113 Lab Response to Patient Inquiry Regarding Radiation Risk Students will be able to demonstrate effective written communication skills. Action/Analysis Goal 2: RT 213 Cover Letter Average 80 % out of 100% RT 213 Resume Average 80 % out of 100% 5 th Semester Didactic Instructor : 93.32% : 91.60% : 89.10% (averaged with resume) : 94.64% : 94 35% 5 th Semester Didactic Instructor : 92.25% : 90.20% : 89.10% (averaged with resume) : 93.32% : 94.98% AAAS/Certificate Programs

30 SLO 1 Tool 1: The benchmark for this SLO of communication has been met with 80% or higher. Patient communication is an area that students consistently score high on their board exam. SLO 1 Tool2: The data for this measurement tool has consistently exceeded the benchmark. This measurement tool is towards the end of the program and students have refined their communication skills. SLO 2 Tool 1: There is a new measurement tool for this student learning objective along with a new instructor and curriculum. The data for this measurement tool has consistently exceeded the benchmark with a small increase in the middle of the five year period (See Objective 5.4). SLO 2 Tool2: The average score for this measurement tool met the benchmark with a dip in the cohort. This cohort scored lower on most testing areas within the program. This appears to be an isolated incident related to this cohort. SLO 2 Tool3: The average score for this measurement tool met the benchmark with a dip in the cohort. This cohort scored lower on most testing areas. This also appears to be an isolated incident related to this cohort. AAAS/Certificate Programs

31 Goal 3: Student/Graduate will be clinically competent. Outcome #l Measurement Tool Benchmark Timeframe Responsible Party Results Student will apply RT 207 (Radiation Average 80% out of 4 th Semester Didactic Instructor : 98.0% radiation safety Protection) Final Grade 100% : 94.0% according to ALARA principles : 92.2% : 92.0% : 93.3% RT 232 Final Student Average 8 out of a 10 6 th Semester Clinical Coordinator : 8.43 Progress Evaluation: point scale : 9.76 Safety Concepts # : : : 9.76 Outcome #2 Measurement Tool Benchmark Timeframe Responsible Party Results Students/Graduates will demonstrate positioning skills. RT 112 Lab (Average of First Year Peer Positioning Tests) RT 232 Final Clinical Competency Evaluation (Positioning Skills #6) Average 8 on a 10 point scale Average 8 on a 10 point scale 2 nd Semester Didactic Instructor : : : : : th Semester Clinical Coordinator : : : : : 9.70 Outcome #3 Measurement Tool Benchmark Timeframe Responsible Party Results Students/Graduates will RT 113 Final Exam Average 80 % 2 nd Semester Didactic Instructor : 84.13% select appropriate technical factors. *New Tool for Cycle will be: RT out of 100% Average 80 % out of 100% 5 th Semester Didactic Instructor : 82.71% : 71.30% 212 Lab Technique : 86.50% Chart : 94.39% AAAS/Certificate Programs

32 RT 232 Final Clinical Evaluation Radiographic Qualities and Techniques #5. Student evaluated by clinical instructor and minimum of 3 technologists. Average 8 on a 10 point scale 6 th Semester Clinical Coordinator : : : : : 9.57 Action/Analysis Goal 3: SLO 1 -Tool 1: The benchmark for this measurement tool has been consistently met with a small dip over the five year period. SLO 1 -Tool 2: The data for this category has maintained well for a benchmark of eight out of a ten point scale with a decrease in the cohort. However, based on the years prior, and since, it seems to be an isolated incident. SLO 2- Tool1: The data for this measurement tool is consistently high, with the exception of the dip in data in the cohort. Typically, this is very high, but since there is a decrease within the current cohort, we will monitor this closely. SLO 2 -Tool 2: The benchmark for this measurement tool has been met. These data values are consistent with board scores within the patient positioning and anatomy categories. SLO 3- Tool1: The benchmark for this measurement tool was consistently met with the exception of the cohort. Again, this same cohort tested lower in most areas. The scores have improved with the two following cohorts. SLO 3 -Tool 2: The data for this measurement tool is consistently high over the four year period. This is the final clinical course where students are the most confident in their techniques. AAAS/Certificate Programs

33 Goal 4: Student will demonstrate professional growth and development. Outcome #l Measurement Tool Benchmark Timeframe Responsible Party Results Student will exhibit Average 2: 8 on a 10 professional attributes point scale in the clinical setting. RT 232 Final Clinical Evaluation Professional Conduct #7 AAAS/Certificate Programs th Semester Clinical Coordinator : : : : : 9.77 RT 232 Behavioral Assessment. Meets Standards or Needs Improvement with Action Plan All students at "meet standards" level in all areas upon completion or necessary action plan 6 th Semester Clinical Coordinator : 100% at meets standards : 100% at meets standards : 100% at meets standards : 100% at meets standards : 100% at meets Outcome #2 Measurement Tool Benchmark Timeframe Responsible Party Results Students will determine the importance of continued professional development. RT212 *New Tool Test Additional Modalities- Final RT 100 Test# 1 Average 2: 8 on a 10 point scale Average score 2: 80 % out of100% 5 th Semester Didactic Instructor : : : : : st Semester Didactic Instructor : 91.81% : 85.93% : 84.14% : 87.00% : 83.00% Action/Analysis Goal 4: SLO 1 -Tool 1: The benchmark on this measurement exceeds the eight out of ten for the past four years. This is consistent with the Program Effectiveness Outcome 2 related to employer's satisfaction with program graduates. SLO Tool2: This measurement tool has been at 100% of the cohorts meeting standards the entire five years. This, also, is consistent with the Program Effectiveness Outcome 2 related to employer's satisfaction with program graduates. SLO 2 Tool1: This measurement has maintained the benchmark score of2: eight on a ten point scale, with a small decrease in score the 2014 year. SLO 2 Tool2: We have maintained our average score above 80%, with a slight decrease in scores over the five year span.

34 Program Structure & Sequence Review & Documentation: In order to be eligible for admission into the Radiologic Technology program, students must: 1. Be a high school graduate or have passed the high school equivalency GED (General Educational Development) Test. 2. Have a high school GPA of at least Have completed in high school a one year course in algebra with at least a grade of C or better. (Suitable equivalent courses are available at GRCC for college credit.) 4. Score at least 40 on the algebra and 76 on the Health algebra test. 5. Score at least 74 on the Health reading test. 6. Complete and earn a grade of C or higher in BI 121 and BI 122 (Effective Fall 2015). Successful completion is defined as a grade of C or better within two attempts. A withdrawal from a course = one attempt. 7. Complete a 7 panel drug screen 8. Complete criminal background check process. Students will not be placed on the wait list until cleared by GRCC police. 9. Students will complete an additional criminal background check and drug screen before starting the program. To be eligible for graduation, students must complete their program within five years from taking the first course in the designated program. In addition to tuition, fees and books there are also costs for uniforms, etc. Estimates of additional costs may be obtained from the Health Program Office. Individuals who have a history of chemical, latex or other sensitivities and/or allergies which occur in the work or clinical environment should be aware such conditions will limit the applicant's ability to complete the clinical requirements of the GRCC health programs. Specific requirements must be met for graduation from each respective GRCC health program. Individuals who elect not to have the hepatitis B vaccination series should be aware such conditions may limit the applicant's ability to complete the clinical requirements of the GRCC health programs. Specific requirements must be met for graduation from each respective GRCC health program. Students with felony convictions or certain misdemeanors will be prevented from participating in clinical experiences and taking state or national licensure and registry examinations. AAAS/Certificate Programs

35 Effective, 2006, federal and state laws require students assigned to long term care facilities, psychiatric agencies, nursing homes, county medical care facilities and homes for the aged to have criminal background checks. GRCC will secure student s consent to perform these criminal checks and release the findings to the facility. The necessary physical functions include: 1. Physical Strength The student will assist in transferring patients from wheelchairs and beds to X ray tables and vice versa. Patients may be comatose, paralyzed or suffering from some degree of incapacity. The student may have to move heavy equipment, such as a portable X ray machine, to different locations. 2. Mobility In the course of performing duties in radiography, the student will be expected to stand and reach overhead to position the X ray tube hanging from the ceiling; move quickly in an emergency; and be able to perform work while standing for long periods of time. 3. Hearing The student must have the ability to hear faint sounds from a distance of 15 feet the approximate distance between the control panel of exposure switches and the X ray table where the patient is being placed. He/she must also be able to hear faint signals emitted by a dysfunctioning machine. 4. Visual Discrimination The student must have vision that enables him/her to differentiate changing colors of X ray images and to read markings on dials, monitors etc. 5. Coordination Good motor skills, eye hand coordination skills, and sensory function in at least one upper limb are needed to align body parts of a patient with the image receptor. Some of the other functions requiring dexterity include filling syringes, putting on surgical gloves, and manipulating locks on equipment. 6. Manual Dexterity Gross motor skills such as standing, walking, and lifting are all required to perform the duties of a Radiologic Technologist. In addition, fine motor skills are needed (such as the ability to make insertion of IV lines, calibrate equipment, draw blood, and so on). 7. Communication Skills The student must be able to communicate orally and in writing. For example, he/she must be able to read and give directions and instructions clearly and to accurately record health data from patients. The Radiologic Technology program is a two year program and requires attendance for four semesters and two summer sessions. Pre Program Requirements BI 121 Human Anatomy and Physiology 1 (4/5) (Lecture 3 / Lab 2 / Clinic 0) *** BI 122 Human Anatomy and Physiology 2 (4/5) (Lecture 3 / Lab 2 / Clinic 0) *** Total Pre Program Credits: 8 AAAS/Certificate Programs

36 First Year Summer (Required) RT 100 Orientation to Health Care (2/2) (Lecture 2 / Lab 0 / Clinic 0) Total Credits: 2 First Semester GH 110 Medical Terminology 1 (2/2) (Lecture 2 / Lab 0 / Clinic 0) ** WE Wellness (1/2) (Lecture 2 / Lab 0 / Clinic 0) ** RT 110 Radiographic Positioning 1 (4/5) (Lecture 3 / Lab 2 / Clinic 0) RT 111 Radiographic Exposure 1 (3/5) (Lecture 3 / Lab 2 / Clinic 0) RT 240 Cross Sectional Imaging (2/2) (Lecture 2 / Lab 0 / Clinic 0) (new change) PL 206 Biomedical Ethics or other humanities (2/2) (new change) Total Credits: 14 Second Semester EN 100 College Writing (3/4) OR EN 101 English Composition 1 (3/3) RT 112 Radiographic Positioning 2 (4/5) (Lecture 3/ Lab 2/ Clinic 0) RT 113 Radiographic Exposure 2 (3/5) (Lecture 3/ Lab 2/ Clinic 0) RT 130 Clinical Practicum in Radiologic Technology 1 (3/3) (Lecture 0/ Lab 0/ Clinic 15) RT 211 Survey of Medical Surgical Diseases (2/2) (Lecture 2 / Lab 0 / Clinic 0) Total Credits: 18 Summer (Required) RT 131 Clinical Practicum in Radiologic Technology 2 (4/4) (Lecture 0 / Lab 0 / Clinic 37.5) Total Credits: 4 Second Year Third Semester EN 102 English Composition 2 (3/3) (Lecture 3 / Lab 0 / Clinic 0) ** AAAS/Certificate Programs

37 S 110 Survey of American Government (3/3) (Lecture 3 / Lab 0 / Clinic 0) ** RT 207 Radiation Protection (2/2) (Lecture 2 / Lab 0 / Clinic 0) RT 210 Radiographic Positioning 3 (4/5) (Lecture 3 / Lab 2 / Clinic 0) RT 230 Clinical Practicum in Radiologic Technology 3 (3/3) (Lecture 0 / Lab 0 / Clinic 22.5) Total Credits: 15 Fourth Semester PY 201 General Psychology (3/3) (Lecture 3 / Lab 0 / Clinic 0) ** RT 212 Radiographic Positioning 4 (4/5) (Lecture 3 / Lab 2 / Clinic 0) RT 213 Radiologic Leadership Skills (2/2) (Lecture 2 / Lab 0 / Clinic 0) RT 215 Physics of X ray (4/5) (Lecture 3 / Lab 2 / Clinic 0) RT 231 Clinical Practicum in Radiologic Technology 4 (3/3) (Lecture 0 / Lab 0 / Clinic 24) Total Credits: 16 Summer II (Required) RT 232 Clinical Practicum in Radiologic Technology 5 (4/4) (Lecture 0 / Lab 0 / Clinic 37.5) Total Credits: 4 Total Credits: 78 In order to be eligible for graduation, Radiologic Technology students must earn a minimum cumulative GPA of 2.0 in the prescribed Radiologic Technology curriculum. * Meeting Time: The number of class hours of attendance required per week. ** These Arts and Sciences courses may be taken prior to admission to the Radiologic Technology program. # Clinical observation is required during the summer preceding entry into the Radiologic Technology program. ***BI 121 and BI 122 must be completed with a C or higher. AAAS/Certificate Programs

38 Transfer Opportunities: The Transfer Guide for many bachelor s degree majors offered at Michigan colleges and universities is available at the Counseling and Career Center and online at Evaluation Questions: 1. What changes to the program structure are being proposed to ensure that the target student population and current student population (traditional, transfer, and/or adult learners) are successful? Please explain. Recent changes to the structure of the program include requiring a C or better in BI 121 and BI 122 as opposed to a C. We are hoping this higher standard will ensure that students will be more prepared to meet the demands of the program. The requirement of a C or better in each Radiologic Technology course, versus a 2.0 cumulative GPA within the program, aligns more closely with individual course requirements. Since the courses within the program are taken in sequence, students are not allowed to continue should they receive a grade below C. 2. Have general education courses been purposefully integrated into the program? How do the general education courses impact the expected learning outcomes for students? The general education courses have been purposefully integrated within the program. It is typical for our students to complete the general education courses prior to entering the program. The general education courses provide a platform that the Radiologic Technology courses can build on. Several general education courses allow students to gain information prior to entering the program that will increase their likelihood of success. Several of these courses include: BI 121, BI 121, Algebra, English, and Psychology and new this fall, a Humanities course. 3. Do the Program Learning Outcomes for the degree reflect the increased learning that the general education courses provide? Will the selected general education courses help students return to college to continue in this field if they choose to do so? As referenced above, general education courses provide a foundation for the Radiologic Technology Program. Yes, the selected general education courses will be helpful to students who chose to continue their education. Many four year colleges accept all of our general education courses and give credit for our Radiologic Technology courses towards a bachelor s degree within this field. 4. Which courses need to have pre requisite courses added to the CARP document? At this time, there are no prerequisite courses that need to be added to the Curriculog document. 5. Are all four of the ILOs and associated competencies integrated into the program? Do students have the opportunity to build the knowledge, skills, and attitudes associated with the ILOs throughout the program? AAAS/Certificate Programs

39 All four of the ILOs and associated competencies are integrated into the Radiologic Technology Program and are demonstrated in the outcomes assessment plan. Students have the opportunity to build the knowledge, skills, and attitudes associated with the ILOs throughout the program. Curriculum Delivery Review & Documentation: Courses Approved for Online Delivery Medical Terminology 1 is the only required Radiologic Technology course that is offered online and face to face. Honors Courses There are no honors courses within the Radiologic Technology Program. Study Away Courses There are no study away courses within the Radiologic Technology Program. Evaluation Questions: 1. Is experiential learning, including internships and academic service learning, systematically embedded into the courses? Are the current experiential learning opportunities sufficient? Please explain. Experiential learning is demonstrated within multiple laboratory courses. Academic Service Learning is consistently completed in the fall of the second year. The Radiologic Technology students also complete over 1,200 hours of clinical experience in five semesters at our affiliated hospital sites. The Radiologic Technology laboratory is fortunate to have two digital energized rooms and two computed radiography rooms. It also, has an energized c arm and surgery table. Additionally, there are five non energized simulation tables. The laboratory has its own dedicated classroom with recording capabilities. 2. Are the online offerings (courses & number of sections) sufficient to meet student and programmatic needs? The Radiologic Technology Program is an applied science. Therefore, the online environment would not provide the needed hands on practice and skills. 3. Are the honors and study away offering sufficient for the program? N/A AAAS/Certificate Programs

40 Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Program structure Yes No Curriculum alignment with external professional standards Yes No Curriculum Alignment K 12 Yes No Program Learning Outcomes Yes No Course offerings Yes No General Education Yes No Honors Program Yes No Study Away Program Yes No Internship Yes No Academic Service Learning Yes No Course sequencing Yes No Pre requisites Yes No Online Offerings (courses & programs) Yes No AAAS/Certificate Programs

41 Assessment of Student Learning Program Learning Outcome(s) Assessed in ILO Measure Findings/ Improvements/Impact Status Spring 2015 We will be assessing the 2015 graduates scores on the national registry exam. We will not have all information until the end of Several courses have been updated and additional information included in the courses to help improve scores on two specific categories on the exam. AAAS/Certificate Programs

42 Job and wage forecasts/employment Preparing for the Future Review & Documentation: Students are prepared for an entry level position upon successful completion of the national registry exam. Our national registry scores are consistently above the national average and our program benchmark. Employment rates have steadily improved since the year Our current five year average placement rate is 80%. The last three year placement rates have been at 80% or above. Our students enjoy a somewhat higher wage rate due to obtaining positions in large area hospitals where the wages are at a higher level. Job and Wage forecasts See Regional Employment Forecasts and Program Effectiveness Measures. It should be noted that the regional forecast is limited to internet postings only and does not include internal postings, which many of our graduates fill. Our Program Effectiveness Measures reflect that data more accurately. Environmental Scanning/Trends See Regional Employment Forecasts and Program Effectiveness Measures. Wages and employment rates are currently on the rise in the field of Radiologic Technology. The program could admit more students with additional clinical sites. Evaluation Questions: 1. Are students obtaining employment upon graduation at satisfactory rates? Yes, students are obtaining employment upon graduation at satisfactory rates. Our current five year average placement rate is above our benchmark (75%) at 80%. 2. Do the job projections and wages data suggest that this program will be viable over the next four years? See Regional Employment Forecast. Again it should be noted that this only includes internet postings and not the internal posting that our students will likely fill. 3. Is the number of graduates aligned with the market need (job forecasts/transfer institutions)? Yes, the number of graduates aligned with the market need. The last several years have had exceptionally high placement rates. Peer Institutions Review & Documentation: GRCC and peer institutions all prepare students for entry level positions after successfully completing the national registry in Radiologic Technology. The timing of the curriculum varies by institution. GRCC provides curriculum and then application through clinical experience throughout the two year program. AAAS/Certificate Programs

43 Some institutions provide the entire curriculum in the first year of the program and students attend clinicals for the entire second year. Evaluation Questions: 1. Are peer institutions offering this program at the same level (certificate, associate s degree)? Is the program offered at a bachelor s degree? If so, could a pre major program be created? Yes, peer institutions offer this program at an associate s level. 2. Are there any institutions with whom GRCC could explore articulation agreements? The program currently enjoys an articulation agreement with Grand Valley State University towards a bachelor s degree. Facilities & Equipment Review & Documentation: PROE Student Survey Results N/A Data not available Advisory Board Survey Results Q1: Instructional program content and quality In all four categories, the survey results are at or above four on a five point scale. Q2: Instructional facilities This question was a difficult question to answer since the advisory board is not in our classroom spaces on a weekly basis. Many responses were Don t Know. Q3: Follow up on program completers and leavers (students with marketable skills) Again, this category had Don t Know, but all other responses were at or above four on a five point scale. We believe this is due to the fact that several respondents were not actual employers. Q4: How could this program be improved There were no responses to this question. Program Planning The hiring of an additional adjunct faculty will decrease the credit load and allow for a backup to all faculty. Evaluation Questions: 1. What did you learn from the PROE Student Survey results? Will you take any actions with the program as a result of what you have learned? N/A Data not available AAAS/Certificate Programs

44 2. What did you learn from the Advisory Board Survey results? Will you take any actions with the program as a result of what you have learned? The advisory board survey results demonstrate above average ratings for each category. 3. Are the resources sufficient to meet identified needs and goals for the next four years? Please explain. Yes, the resources are sufficient to meet identified needs and goals for the next four years. The department has recently been upgraded (see below regarding equipment and facilities). Resources needed for continued support are as follows: The college provides good financial support to the RT program. GRCC allocates funds each fiscal year from July 1 to June 30 for operating expenses. The RT program s budget for the fiscal year was $19, with total personnel expenditures of $340, The RT program s budget for the fiscal year was $32, with total personnel expenditures of $348, to date. The RT Program s budget for the fiscal year was $28, with total personnel expenditures of $341, to date. Total expenditures were $370, o Note: Monies were added to the budget to accommodate possible financial obligations for the MRI Consortium of which GRCC is a member. The Michigan State Department of Education provides Perkins Grant money to improve occupational program s equipment needs. Equipment request s for funds is dependent on meeting the requirements of the grant. Additionally, the Perkins Grant provides funds for Professional Development. The grant provided approximately $1, for two faculty in the fiscal year. The college supports two full time faculty and two adjunct faculty. In addition, the program utilizes five clinical sites with a total of nine clinical instructors. The college also provides funding for faculty Professional Development activities. The faculty s contractual agreement provides two days per year leave of absence and faculty received an allocation of $ for the year The GRCC Library purchases media instructional materials, books and periodicals from their own budget. The Library staff works closely with the RT faculty making sure that there are current radiologic technology books and computer software applicable to our field. IIPD awards provide Michigan state grant monies for Professional Development. Awards are given based on merit and approval by the IIPD committee. The college provides two faculty in service days each academic year focusing on college assessment, curriculum development, professional development and teacher evaluation. A faculty member may request self improvement through study, leave of absence (sabbatical leave) for one semester upon approval of the Sabbatical committee according to the faculty contract. There are no factors that might hinder the institution s ability to demonstrate sound financial commitment to the program s mission and goals. 4. Are the facilities and equipment adequate to facilitate teaching and learning? Please explain. AAAS/Certificate Programs

45 Yes, the facilities and equipment are sufficient to meet the needs of the program. The department recently moved to a totally renovated floor. The department now includes additional space with both a lecture and a laboratory classroom. We now have five, as opposed to four, non energized simulation tables, along with three upright positioning buckeys. We now have an additional energized radiographic room, which makes a total of four rooms. Two radiographic rooms were transferred as is. The third room was upgraded from a Computed Radiography (CR) to a Digital Radiography (DR)/CR room. In addition, we have a brand new DR/CR room. This room also includes a brand new C arm and C arm positioning table. We now have four stationary computers within the lab and media capabilities within the laboratory and the updated CR/DR room. The laboratory purchased an additional adult positioning phantom and is currently waiting to receive the pediatric positioning phantom. The Fuji CR film processor has been upgraded. Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Job & Wage Forecasts Yes No Collaboration Opportunities with Peers Yes No Program Planning Yes No Securing resources for course development/administration Yes No Facilities/equipment upgrades Yes No *We are very grateful for our recent upgrades. Other: Yes No Other: Yes No Other: Yes No Other: Yes No Curriculum Crosswalk Work Products AAAS/Certificate Programs

46 B. Regional Employment Forecasts Includes the following counties: Allegan Barry Ionia Kent Lake Mason Mecosta Montcalm Muskegon Newaygo Oceana Osceola Ottawa SOC Description Radiologic Technologists Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists 2013 Jobs 2014 Jobs 2018 Jobs Change % Change Annual Openings Median Hourly Earnings 979 1,005 1, % 39 $ % 6 $30.55 SOC Hourly Earnings Range $ $30.77 Average Monthly Postings^ Average Monthly Hires^ Annual # of Job Postings! Regional Completions (2013) Typical Entry Level Education Associate's degree Age Age % of Occupation % $ $ Associate's degree 22 14% EMSI, Analyst 2014 ^EMSI, Job Postings Analytics 2014! Burning Glass, Labor Insights Jobs, 2014! The number of annual job posting was reduced by 20% to compensate for duplicate ads AAAS/Certificate Programs

47 #1 Students will complete the program. #2 Employers will be satisfied with the performance of newly hired technologists. Program Effectiveness Measures Measurement Tool Benchmark Timeframe Responsible Party Results Graduation roster 75% out of 100% End of program Program Director : 97% : 90% : 81% : 86% Employer Survey Question # out of a 4 point scale 6 months postgraduation (or upon completion by all) Program Director : : NA : : NA #3 Graduates will be satisfied with their results. Graduate Survey Question #8, Section B 3.5 out of a 5 point scale 6 months postgraduation Program Director : : : : NA #4 Students seeking employment will be gainfully employed within 6 months postgraduation. #5 Students will pass the national certification examination on the first attempt. Graduate Survey Question #3 National Certification Exam 1 st time pass rate 75% out of 100% 85% out of 100% 6 months postgraduation 6 months postgraduation (or upon completion by all) Program Director 2009 Grads: 64.2% 2010 Grads: 78.3% 2011 Grads: 80.0% 2012 Grads: 95.0% 2013 Grads: 80.0% 5 yr. Avg = 79.50% Program Director : 96% : 94% : 88% : 95% : 96% 5 yr. Avg = 93.8% AAAS/Certificate Programs

48 Data Packet for Academic Program Review 305 Radiologic Technology (AAAS) (CIP ) 383 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Certificate) (CIP ) Radiologic Technology and MRI Certificate Data Packet for Program Review,

49 Table of Contents I. Program Enrollment and Student Progress A. Enrollment 1. All Students 2. Demographics of Students Enrolled in Program 3. New Students (First Time in Any College) B. Student Progress C. Number of Graduates II. Course Data A. Course Enrollment and Success 1. Summary 2. Demographic Detail III. Perkins Data IV. Employment A. Graduate Employment Rates B. Regional Employment Forecasts V. Completions at Transfer and Other Two Year Schools VI. Definitions Radiologic Technology and MRI Certificate Data Packet for Program Review,

50 I. Program Enrollment and Student Progress A. Enrollment 1. All Students Enrollment by Program, Fall 2010 to Fall Plan Description 305 Radiologic Technology MRI Certificate n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 Total Workforce Development 7,530 7,202 7,094 6,876 6, Demographics of Students in Program, Fall 2010 to Fall Radiologic Technology % Female 64% 76% 69% 62% 64% % Male 36% 24% 31% 38% 36% % Fulltime 7% 6% 2% 2% 50% % Parttime 93% 94% 98% 98% 50% Average Age % American Indian 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% % Asian 0% 2% 2% 4% 5% % Black 0% 4% 4% 4% 2% % Hispanic 5% 4% 0% 4% 7% % White 93% 85% 90% 86% 86% % Unknown 2% 6% 4% 2% 0% 385 MRI Certificate % Female % Male % Fulltime % Parttime Not applicable/new program Average Age % American Indian % Asian % Black % Hispanic % White % Unknown Radiologic Technology and MRI Certificate Data Packet for Program Review,

51 A. Enrollment (Cont.) 3. New Students (First Time in Any College) New Student Enrollment by Program, Fall 2010 to Fall 2014 Plan Description Radiologic Technology MRI Certificate n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Total Workforce Development 1,273 1,198 1,170 1,100 1,042 B. Student Progress* Plan Code Description N Students Graduated Graduated/ Transfered Transfered Still Here Left Ed Grad/Transfer/ Still Here 305 Radiologic Technology % 385 MRI Certificate n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Total Workforce Development 9, ,091 4,132 3,851 60% * One year progress measure; i.e., the fall 2014 status of students who were enrolled in the program in the academic year. C. Number of Graduates, by Year Academic Year Plan Description Radiologic Technology MRI Certificate n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Total Workforce Development Radiologic Technology and MRI Certificate Data Packet for Program Review,

52 II. Course Data A. Historical Course Enrollment and Success (Earned Grades* by Course, by Year) 1. Summary Course Enrollment A to C Withdrew Enrollment A to C Withdrew Enrollment A to C Withdrew Enrollment A to C Withdrew RT % 0% % 0% 28 96% 0% % 0% RT % 0% 27 96% 0% 28 89% 0% % 0% RT % 0% % 0% 28 96% 0% % 0% RT % 4% % 0% % 0% 24 96% 4% RT % 4% % 0% % 0% 24 96% 4% RT % 4% 24 96% 0% % 0% 24 88% 4% RT % 0% 27 96% 0% % 0% % 0% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% 24 96% 4% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% 24 96% 4% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% 24 96% 4% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% % 0% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% % 0% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% % 0% RT % 0% % 0% 23 96% 0% 25 96% 4% RT % 0% % 0% % 0% % 0% RT % 0% 27 96% 0% 26 96% 0% MRI No course history available yet. Total GRCC 72% 13% 72% 12% 74% 11% 74% 8% *Does not include I (Incomplete), D or E Radiologic Technology and MRI Certificate Data Packet for Program Review,

53 Winter 2013 Course Completion/Success RT ### Success is defined as grades of A through C All Students in RT ### (TBD) Race/ Ethnicity Number Course Enrollments White non Hispanic Black non Hispanic Hispanic Asian / Pacific Islander Native American No response or other Total Number Successful Course Enrollments Percent Successful Course Enrollments Age Less than or older Total Number Course Enrollments Number Successful Course Enrollments Percent Successful Course Enrollments Gender Female Male Total Number Course Enrollments Number Successful Course Enrollments Percent Successful Course Enrollments Pell Pell No Pell Total Number Course Enrollments Number Successful Course Enrollments Percent Successful Course Enrollments Radiologic Technology and MRI Certificate Data Packet for Program Review,

54 Radiologic Technology ( ) CORE INDICATOR 1P1: % of CTE concentrators who passed technical skill assessments that are aligned with industry recognized standards, if available and appropriate, during the reporting year (that can be identified) 2P1: % of CTE concentrators who received an industry recognized credential, a certificate, or a degree during the reporting year. 3P1: % of CTE concentrators who remained enrolled in their original postsecondary institution or transferred to another 2 or 4 year postsecondary institution during the reporting year and who were enrolled in postsecondary education in the fall of the previous reporting year. 4P1: % of CTE concentrators who were placed or retained in employment military service or apprenticeship programs in the 2nd quarter following the program year in which they left postsecondary education (i.e., unduplicated placement status for CTE concentrators who graduated by June 30, 2011 would be assessed between October 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011). 5P1: % of CTE participants from underrepresented gender groups who participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year. 5P2: % of CTE concentrators from underrepresented gender groups who completed a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year. State Goal III. Perkins Data GRCC Program State Goal GRCC Program State Goal GRCC Program 85.25% % 91.08% 96.15% 92% 96.00% 28.25% 84.38% 26.93% % 29% 95.56% 60.25% 45.00% 70.00% 96.43% 71% 86.21% 43.25% % 70.00% % 71% % 16.75% 36.07% 23.62% 22.41% 23.70% 30.77% 13.25% N/A 20.65% 12.56% 20.70% 22.73% State Goal GRCC Program Radiologic Technology and MRI Certificate Data Packet for Program Review,

55 Note: Shaded cells indicate that state goal was not reached by this program. Radiologic Technology and MRI Certificate Data Packet for Program Review,

56 IV. Employment A. Graduate Employment Rates (From the survey mailed to alumni. The question asks for the graduates status in October following the academic year in which they graduated. ) Plan 305 (Radiologic Technology) Response rate #/# = #% #/# = #% Employed in a job related to the program taken at GRCC Continuing education and EMPLOYED in a job related to the program taken at GRCC *Number of survey respondents/number of surveys mailed Radiologic Technology and MRI Certificate Data Packet for Program Review,

57 B. Regional Employment Forecasts Includes the following counties: Allegan Barry Ionia Kent Lake Mason Mecosta Montcalm Muskegon Newaygo Oceana Osceola Ottawa SOC Description Radiologic Technologists Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists 2013 Jobs 2014 Jobs 2018 Jobs Change % Change Annual Openings Median Hourly Earnings 979 1,005 1, % 39 $ % 6 $30.55 SOC Hourly Earnings Range $ $30.77 Average Monthly Postings^ Average Monthly Hires^ Annual # of Job Postings! Regional Completions (2013) Typical Entry Level Education Associate's degree Age Age % of Occupation % $ $ Associate's degree 22 14% EMSI, Analyst 2014 ^EMSI, Job Postings Analytics 2014! Burning Glass, Labor Insights Jobs, 2014! The number of annual job posting was reduced by 20% to compensate for duplicate ads Radiologic Technology and MRI Certificate Data Packet for Program Review,

58 V. Completions, Comparisons CIP Radiologic Technology/Science Radiographer Numbers of Degrees/Certificates Awarded at Other MI Institutions CIP , Number of Completions , by Award Level Award Level Institution Name Less Than One Year Associate s Degree Bachelor s Degree Grand Rapids Community College 26 Henry Ford Community College 23 Jackson College 17 Lake Michigan College 15 Lansing Community College 1 25 Northern Michigan University 9 Oakland University 2 Siena Heights University 65 Source: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (as reported by institutions) Radiologic Technology and MRI Certificate Data Packet for Program Review,