Student Financing of Undergraduate Education:
|
|
- Robert Cummings
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Student Financing of Undergraduate Education: Statistical Analysis Report U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement NCES
2 Student Financing of Undergraduate Education: Statistical Analysis Report U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement NCES July 2002 Lutz Berkner Ali Berker Kathryn Rooney Katharin Peter MPR Associates, Inc. Andrew G. Malizio Project Officer National Center for Education Statistics
3 U.S. Department of Education Rod Paige Secretary Office of Educational Research and Improvement Grover J. Whitehurst Assistant Secretary National Center for Education Statistics Gary W. Phillips Deputy Commissioner The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data related to education in the United States and other nations. It fulfills a congressional mandate to collect, collate, analyze, and report full and complete statistics on the condition of education in the United States; conduct and publish reports and specialized analyses of the meaning and significance of such statistics; assist state and local education agencies in improving their statistical systems; and review and report on education activities in foreign countries. NCES activities are designed to address high priority education data needs; provide consistent, reliable, complete, and accurate indicators of education status and trends; and report timely, useful, and high quality data to the U.S. Department of Education, the Congress, the states, other education policymakers, practitioners, data users, and the general public. We strive to make our products available in a variety of formats and in language that is appropriate to a variety of audiences. You, as our customer, are the best judge of our success in communicating information effectively. If you have any comments or suggestions about this or any other NCES product or report, we would like to hear from you. Please direct your comments to: July 2002 National Center for Education Statistics Office of Educational Research and Improvement U.S. Department of Education 1990 K Street NW Washington, DC The NCES World Wide Web Home Page address is The NCES World Wide Web Electronic Catalog is: Suggested Citation U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. Student Financing of Undergraduate Education: , NCES by Lutz Berkner, Ali Berker, Kathryn Rooney, and Katharin Peter. Project Officer: Andrew G. Malizio. Washington, DC: For ordering information on this report, write: U.S. Department of Education ED Pubs P.O. Box 1398 Jessup, MD Or call toll free ED Pubs Content Contact: Aurora D Amico (202) Aurora.D Amico@ed.gov
4 Executive Summary During the academic year, about 16.5 million 1 undergraduates were enrolled in postsecondary institutions for all or part of the year, as full- or part-time students. More than onehalf (55 percent) of them received some type of financial aid from federal, state, institutional, or other sources to meet their educational expenses, receiving, on average, $6,200 (figure A). This report describes the financing of undergraduate education by students who were enrolled in U.S. postsecondary institutions during the academic year. It is based on data from the National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:2000), the fifth in a series of surveys conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), U.S. Department of Education. Each NPSAS survey is a comprehensive nationwide study to determine how students and their families pay for postsecondary education. The two major types of financial aid awarded to students are grants and loans. In , 44 percent of all undergraduates received grants, for an average of $3,500. Twenty-nine percent of all undergraduates received student loans, averaging $5,100. In addition, 5 percent of all undergraduates held work-study jobs, earning an average of $1,700, and 7 percent received other Figure A. Percentage distribution of all undergraduates according to aid package, percentage receiving different types of aid, Figure 1. and average amount of aid for aided students: No aid Aided, no loans $2,900 45% 7% 27% 22% Loans and other aid $10,600 All undergraduates Aid type Percent Average Grants 44 $3,500 Loans 29 $5,100 Work-study 5 $1,700 Other 7 $4,700 Any aid 55 $6,200 Loans only $5,200 NOTE: Loans only include loans to students. Parent PLUS loans are categorized as other aid. Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:2000). 1 Data not shown. This estimate is for undergraduates enrolled at any time in , and is therefore higher than the total fall enrollment. iii
5 Executive Summary types of aid, including veteran s benefits, job training and vocational rehabilitation funds, and federal PLUS loans to parents. Many undergraduates received more than one type of financial aid in their aid package. As shown in figure A, for 7 percent of all undergraduates, student loans were the only type of financial aid received; 22 percent took out loans but were also awarded grants or other aid; and 27 percent had aid packages that included grants, work-study, or other aid, but no loans. Those who had aid packages consisting of loans and other aid averaged $10,600 in total aid, compared with $5,200 for those with loans only and $2,900 for those without loans. Thirty-nine percent of all undergraduates were enrolled full time for a full academic year in , but the proportion varied by type of institution, from more than one-half of the undergraduates at 4-year institutions to about onefifth at public 2-year institutions. Figure B shows that among full-time, full-year undergraduates, about three-fourths (73 percent) relied on some type of financial aid to help pay for their postsecondary education, receiving an average of $8,500. Tuition and the Total Price of Attendance Within an institution, full-time, full-year students usually have the highest educational expenses because they are charged the full tuition price and incur other education-related expenses for a full academic year. As shown in figure C, the tuition and fees for full-time, full-year undergraduates in averaged about $1,600 at public 2-year institutions, $4,300 at public 4-year institutions, $8,900 at private for- Figure B. Percentage distribution of full-time, full-year undergraduates according to aid package, percentage receiving different Figure 1. types of aid, and average amount of aid for aided students: Aided, no loans $4,700 No aid Loans only $5,600 28% 10% 27% 36% Loans and other aid $12,100 Full-time, full-year undergraduates Aid type Percent Average Grants 59 $4,900 Loans 45 $5,400 Work-study 11 $1,700 Other 10 $6,000 Any aid 73 $8,500 NOTE: Loans only include loans to students. Parent PLUS loans are categorized as other aid. Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding. Full-time, full-year students represent 39 percent of all undergraduates. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:2000). iv
6 Executive Summary Figure C. Average tuition and fees, nontuition expenses, and total price of attendance for full-time, full-year undergraduates, Figure 2. by type of institution attended: Amount $28,000 $24,000 $23,600 $20,000 $16,000 $12,000 $8,000 $4,000 $0 $9,100 7,500 1,600 $12,600 8,400 4,300 8,600 15,000 Public 2-year Public 4-year Private not-for-profit 4-year $18,400 9,400 8,900 Private for-profit Price of attendance Nontuition Tuition and fees NOTE: Nontuition expenses are based on institutional student budget estimates and include room and board, books and supplies, transportation, and personal expenses while enrolled. Amounts may not sum to totals due to rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:2000). profit institutions, and $15,000 at private not-forprofit 4-year institutions. The tuition and fees at any particular institution within these sectors may vary considerably from these averages. The total price of attendance is the sum of tuition and fees and estimated nontuition expenses such as room and board, books and supplies, transportation, and personal expenses while enrolled. For full-time, full-year undergraduates, the average total price of attendance in was $9,100 at public 2-year institutions, $12,600 at public 4-year institutions, $18,400 at private for-profit institutions, and $23,600 at private notfor-profit 4-year institutions. Tuition and fees and nontuition expenses for the 62 percent of undergraduates enrolled part time or part year are much lower than these amounts. Financial Aid, Price of Attendance, and Income The percentage of undergraduates receiving financial aid increased as the price of attendance rose, while the percentage receiving aid decreased as family income rose. These two patterns reflect the need analysis formula used to award financial aid. With the exception of some merit-based scholarships and some loan programs (notably, federal unsubsidized Stafford and PLUS loans), most financial aid programs are need based. Lowincome students who have limited resources will usually qualify for need-based aid at any price of attendance; high-income students will only qualify for need-based aid if they are attending institutions with a high price of attendance. About three-fourths of all low-income dependent undergraduates (those with a family income of less than $30,000) received financial aid in , compared with about one-half (48 percent) v
7 Executive Summary of high-income dependent undergraduates (those with a family income of more than $80,000). Financial Aid by Type of Institution Attended The percentage of undergraduates receiving financial aid, the types of aid received, and the average amounts varied by the type of institution attended, as shown in figure D. At public 2-year institutions, 38 percent of all undergraduates received financial aid in , with an average award of $2,300. One-third (33 percent) of the public 2-year students received a grant (averaging $1,600), and 7 percent took out a student loan (averaging $3,300). These percentages and average amounts were lower than those in any other sectors, reflecting the lower tuition and the high percentage of part-time and part-year students (81 percent) at public 2-year institutions. At public 4-year institutions, 62 percent of all undergraduates received financial aid, with an average award of $6,200. The percentage awarded grants was higher than the percentage taking out student loans (46 vs. 40 percent), but the average grant amount was lower than the average loan amount ($3,200 vs. $4,800). At private not-for-profit 4-year institutions, 76 percent of all undergraduates received financial aid, and the average amount was $11,600. About two-thirds of undergraduates (66 percent) had grants, and one-half took out student loans. The average grant amount was higher than the average loan amount ($7,000 vs. $6,200). At private for-profit institutions, 85 percent of undergraduates received financial aid, including 67 percent with loans and 60 percent with grants. Students enrolled at private for-profit institutions were more likely to be low income than those at the other types of institutions. Figure D. Percentage of all undergraduates receiving any aid, grants, or loans and average amounts received by aided Figure 6. students, by type of institution attended: Any aid Grants Loans Percent Public 2-year Public 4-year Private not-for-profit 4-year Private for-profit Average total aid* $2,300 $6,200 $11,600 $7,200 Average grants $1,600 $3,200 7,000 2,700 Average loans $3,300 $4,800 6,200 5,800 *Includes types of aid other than grants and loans. NOTE: Loans only include loans to students. Parent PLUS loans are categorized as other aid. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:2000). vi
8 Executive Summary The Sources of Financial Aid As shown in figure E, undergraduates with loans were most likely to receive them from the federal government: in , the percentage of undergraduates taking out federal loans (28 percent) was much higher than the percentages borrowing through state (1 percent), institutional (1 percent), and private commercial or nonprofit sources (3 percent). Undergraduates with grants, on the other hand, were more likely to receive them from a variety of sources. More undergraduates were awarded grants from the federal government (23 percent) than from any other source, but 17 percent received grants from institutional sources, 14 percent from state sources, and 7 percent from private sources. Low-income dependent undergraduates were more likely to receive grants from the federal government than from any other source. Middle-income dependent undergraduates were more likely to receive grants from state and institutional sources than from federal or private sources. High-income dependent undergraduates were more likely to receive grants from state, institutional, and private sources than from federal sources. Both low-income and middle-income independent undergraduates were more likely to receive grants from the federal government than from any other source. Among all undergraduates, federal grants were awarded to 17 percent of those at public 2-year institutions, about one-quarter of those at public and private not-for-profit 4-year institutions, and 53 percent of those at private for-profit institutions. At private not-for-profit 4-year Figure E. Percentage of all undergraduates receiving grants or loans and average amounts received by aided students, Figure 6. by source of funds: Percent aided Grants Loans Any source Federal State Institutional Private Average total aid* Average grants Average loans $6,200 3,500 5,100 $5,200 2,100 4,600 $1,800 1,700 3,900 $3,800 3,700 2,400 $3,200 2,100 5,100 *Includes types of aid other than grants and loans. NOTE: Loans only include loans to students. Parent PLUS loans are categorized as other aid. Employer tuition reimbursements are not shown separately, but are included in total grants. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:2000). vii
9 Executive Summary institutions, 46 percent of all undergraduates received institutional grants, a higher percentage than at any other type of institution. Undergraduates at these institutions also received a larger average institutional grant award ($6,600) than those at any other type of institution. undergraduates ($5,500 vs. $3,800). Among dependent Stafford borrowers, 69 percent borrowed the maximum annual amount. Among independent borrowers, whose annual loan limits were about double those for dependent borrowers, 27 percent borrowed the maximum. Student Loans Among undergraduates who borrowed in , nearly all (97 percent) took out federal student loans; 13 percent took out nonfederal loans, usually in combination with federal loans. The average federal student loan was $4,600. The largest source of federal student loans is the Stafford loan program, which offers students two types of loans, subsidized and unsubsidized. Subsidized Stafford loans are awarded on the basis of need and are interest free to students while they are enrolled. Unsubsidized Stafford loans require no need test, but charge interest while students are enrolled. Depending on their financial need, students may receive subsidized loans, unsubsidized loans, or both types. Stafford loans have annual loan limits that vary by students class level and dependency status. Students may borrow more at higher class levels, and independent students may borrow about double the amount available to dependent students at the same class level. About one-half (48 percent) of Stafford borrowers took out need-based subsidized loans only, 17 percent took out unsubsidized loans only, and 36 percent took out both. Independent undergraduates were more likely than dependent undergraduates to take out a combination of subsidized and unsubsidized loans (58 percent vs. 21 percent), and the average Stafford loan was higher for independent than for dependent Student Borrowing at Different Types of Institutions The student loans that undergraduates took out to pay for educational expenses in may only represent a portion of the cumulative amount that they had borrowed for their undergraduate education. Among all undergraduates enrolled in postsecondary education, 42 percent had borrowed through the federal student loan programs at some time, either in that academic year or in prior years, with an average cumulative amount of $9,900. Among the seniors who received a bachelor s degree at any 4-year institution in , 62 percent had taken out a federal student loan at some time, and for those students, the average cumulative amount was $16,900. While only 7 percent of all public 2-year undergraduates took out a federal student loan in (borrowing an average of $3,100), 23 percent had taken out a federal student loan at some time, either in the academic year or earlier, borrowing a cumulative amount of $6,300, on average. Many students had already repaid their federal loans, probably because they had borrowed only in prior years and had spells in which they were not enrolled; 17 percent still had outstanding federal loan debts. About one-half (52 percent) of all undergraduates attending public 4-year institutions in had borrowed through the federal student loan programs at some time, averaging a cumulative amount of $11,000 in federal loans. viii
10 Executive Summary Sixty percent of those who attained a bachelor s degree at a public 4-year institution in had taken out a federal student loan at some time as an undergraduate, with a cumulative average of $16,100 in federal loans. At private not-for-profit 4-year institutions, 61 percent of the undergraduates had received a federal student loan at some time, with a cumulative average of $12,000. About two-thirds (66 percent) of the graduating seniors at private not-for-profit 4-year institutions had borrowed through the federal student loan programs as an undergraduate, having received $18,000, on average, by the completion of their bachelor s degrees. Summary Financial aid played a major role in the financing of undergraduate postsecondary education in More than one-half of all undergraduates received some type of financial aid. More undergraduates received grants than loans to help pay for their education, but the average grant amount was less than the average amount borrowed. The average amounts of financial aid, however, varied considerably by the type of institution and price of attendance, as well as the attendance status and family income of the student. At public 2-year institutions, where students had a lower average price of attendance, most of the aided students did not take out student loans. At private not-for-profit 4-year institutions, where students had a higher average price of attendance, about one-half of undergraduates took out student loans, but most of them also received a substantial amount of grant aid. More undergraduates received grants from the federal financial aid programs than from any other single source, but states, postsecondary institutions, and private organizations were also important sources of grant aid to undergraduates. Low-income dependent undergraduates were more likely to receive federal grants; middle-income dependent undergraduates were more likely to receive grants from state and institutional sources than from federal sources. High-income dependent undergraduates were more likely to receive grants from state, institutional, and private sources than from federal sources. Nearly all of the undergraduates who borrowed, however, took out loans through the federal student loan programs. On average, undergraduates borrowed about $5,100 to pay for educational expenses in The cumulative federal loan amounts that undergraduates had ever borrowed were about twice this amount. Two-fifths of all undergraduates enrolled in had borrowed through the federal student loan programs at some time, and their average cumulative federal loan was almost $10,000. Three-fifths of all the graduating seniors at 4-year institutions in had borrowed through the federal student loan programs at some time, and their average cumulative federal loan was almost $17,000. ix
11 Foreword This report describes the tuition, total price of attendance, and financial aid received by undergraduates who were enrolled in U.S. postsecondary institutions during the academic year. It is based on data from the National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:2000), the fifth in a series of surveys conducted by the U.S. Department of Education. Each NPSAS survey is a comprehensive nationwide study to determine how students and their families pay for postsecondary education. The report begins with a discussion of the percentage of undergraduates receiving various types of financial aid, the sources of the aid, and the average award amounts in The focus is on loans and grants at the four major types of institutions where undergraduates were enrolled: public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit postsecondary institutions. In addition to the loans received in , there is also a description of the cumulative amount of federal loans that students had ever borrowed as undergraduates. The report includes a compendium of tables that describe tuition, total price of attendance, and the various types and sources of financial aid in more detail by institutional and student characteristics. To facilitate comparisons, the compendium tables are numbered the same as in the NPSAS:1996 undergraduate financing descriptive report. The estimates presented in the report were produced using the NCES Data Analysis System (DAS), a microcomputer application that allows users to specify and generate tables for the NPSAS:2000 undergraduate survey. The DAS produces the design-adjusted standard errors necessary for testing the statistical significance of differences in the estimates. For more information on the DAS, readers should consult appendix B of this report. x
12 Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank all those who contributed to this report. At MPR Associates, Laura Horn and Susan Choy reviewed the analysis at various stages and provided many good suggestions. Barbara Kridl supervised the production of the report; Andrea Livingston edited it; Francesca Tussing and Wes Nations formatted the tables, prepared the graphics, and assembled the final report. We would like to thank our project officer, Andrew Malizio, for his guidance throughout all stages of the NPSAS:2000 project. Paula Knepper and Tracy Hunt-White provided a careful and thorough technical review of the text and tables. We would also like to thank the following for reviewing the final report and providing helpful comments: Dennis Carroll, Marilyn McMillen, and Laurence Ogle at NCES; Kent Phillippe of the American Association of Community Colleges; and Jacqueline King of the American Council on Education. xi
13 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
14 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary... iii Foreword... x Acknowledgments... xi List of Tables... xiv List of Figures... xxii Financial Aid in Introduction... 1 Tuition and the Price of Attendance in Financial Aid, Price of Attendance, and Income... 6 Financial Aid by Type of Institution Attended... 8 The Sources of Financial Aid Student Loans Student Borrowing at Different Types of Institutions Conclusion References Table Compendium Section 1: Supplemental Text Tables Section 2: Tuition and Price of Attendance Section 3: Financial Aid Section 4: Net Price and Need Section 5: Student Characteristics Appendix A Glossary Appendix B Technical Notes and Methodology xiii
15 List of Tables Table Page COMPENDIUM TABLES Section 1: Supplemental Text Tables 1.0 Percentage distribution (by columns) of undergraduates according to selected characteristics, by type of institution attended: Grants, loans and total aid by institution type 1.1-A Percentage of undergraduates receiving any aid, any grants, or any loans, and average amount received B 1.1-C Percentage of undergraduates in public 2-year institutions receiving any aid, any grants, or any loans, and average amounts received Percentage of undergraduates in public 4-year institutions receiving any aid, any grants, or any loans, and average amounts received D Percentage of undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions receiving any aid, any grants, or any loans, and average amounts received E Percentage of undergraduates in private for-profit institutions receiving any aid, any grants, or any loans, and average amounts received Combinations of loans and other aid by institution type 1.2-A Percentage distribution of undergraduates and average amount of financial aid according to combinations of loans and other aid received B 1.2-C Percentage distribution of undergraduates in public 2-year institutions and average amount of financial aid according to combinations of loans and other aid received Percentage distribution of undergraduates in public 4-year institutions and average amount of financial aid according to combinations of loans and other aid received xiv
16 List of Tables Table Page 1.2-D Percentage distribution of undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions and average amount of financial aid according to combinations of loans and other aid received E Percentage distribution of undergraduates in private for-profit institutions and average amount of financial aid according to combinations of loans and other aid received Grants and total aid by source 1.2-F Percentage of all undergraduates receiving grants, and average grant amount, according to the source of grant funds G Percentage of full-time, full-year undergraduates receiving grants, and average grant amount, according to the source of grant funds H Among all undergraduates who received any grants, the percentage receiving grants, and average grant amount, according to the source of grant funds I 1.2-J Among full-time, full-year undergraduates who received any grants, the percentage receiving grants, and average grant amount, according to the source of grant funds Percentage of all undergraduates receiving aid, and average aid amount, according to the source of aid funds K Percentage of full-time, full-year undergraduates receiving aid, and average aid amount, according to the source of aid funds Federal loans (including cumulative) by institution type 1.3-A Percentage of undergraduates who received a federal student loan in or ever received a federal student loan through 2000 and average amounts borrowed, by student characteristics B 1.3-C Percentage of undergraduates in public 2-year institutions who received a federal student loan in or ever received a federal student loan through 2000 and average amounts borrowed, by student characteristics Percentage of undergraduates in public 4-year institutions who received a federal student loan in or ever received a federal student loan through 2000 and average amounts borrowed, by student characteristics xv
17 List of Tables Table Page 1.3-D Percentage of undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions who received a federal student loan in or ever received a federal student loan through 2000 and average amounts borrowed, by student characteristics E Percentage of undergraduates in private for-profit institutions who received a federal student loan in or ever received a federal student loan through 2000 and average amounts borrowed, by student characteristics Types and combinations of federal loans 1.4-A Percentage of undergraduates receiving loans from various types of programs, by institutional and student characteristics B Average amount of loans received by undergraduates from various types of programs, by institutional and student characteristics A Percentage distribution of federal student loan borrowers according to combinations of loans from various federal programs, by institutional and student characteristics B Average amount received by federal student loan borrowers in according to combinations of loans from various federal programs, by institutional and student characteristics Federal Stafford loans 1.6-A Percentage of undergraduates receiving any Stafford, any subsidized, and any unsubsidized loans, and average loan amounts, by institutional and student characteristics B Percentage of undergraduate Stafford loan borrowers with subsidized and unsubsidized loans, and average loan amounts, by institutional and student characteristics Percentage distribution of undergraduates with Stafford loans according to subsidized and unsubsidized loan combinations and average loan amounts, by institutional and student characteristics A Percentage of undergraduates receiving Stafford subsidized loans and average loan amounts according to subsidized maximum or less than maximum amounts borrowed, by institutional and student characteristics B Percentage of undergraduates receiving any Stafford loans and average loan amounts according to total maximum or less than maximum amounts borrowed, by institutional and student characteristics xvi
18 List of Tables Table Page 1.9 Average tuition and fees, nontuition expenses, and total price of attendance for undergraduates, by type of institution and attendance pattern Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to type of institution attended, by institutional and student characteristics Section 2: Tuition and Price of Attendance Price of attendance 2.1-A Average total price of attendance according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: B 2.1-C Average total price of attendance for full-time, full-year undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to total price of attendance, by institutional and student characteristics: Tuition and fees 2.2-A Average tuition and fees for undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: B 2.2-C Average tuition and fees for full-time, full-year undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: Average tuition and fees for part-time or part-year undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: D Percentage distribution of all undergraduates according to tuition and fees, by institutional and student characteristics: Section 3: Financial Aid Type of aid 3.1-A Percentage of undergraduates receiving aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: B Average amount of aid received by aided undergraduates according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: xvii
19 List of Tables Table Page Any aid 3.1-C Percentage of undergraduates receiving any aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: D Average amount of total aid received by undergraduates who received any aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: Federal aid 3.2-A Percentage of undergraduates receiving federal aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: B 3.2-C Average amount of federal aid received by undergraduates who received federal aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: Percentage of undergraduates receiving federal aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: D Average amount of federal aid received by undergraduates who received federal aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: State aid 3.3-A Percentage of undergraduates receiving state aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: B 3.3-C Average amount of state aid received by undergraduates who received state aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: Percentage of undergraduates receiving state aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: D Average amount of state aid received by undergraduates who received state aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: Institutional aid 3.4-A Percentage of undergraduates receiving institutional aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: xviii
20 List of Tables Table 3.4-B 3.4-C Page Average amount of institutional aid received by undergraduates who received institutional aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: Percentage of undergraduates receiving institutional aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: D Average amount of institutional aid received by undergraduates who received institutional aid, by type of institution and student characteristics: Combinations of aid types 3.5-A Percentage distribution of aided undergraduates according to combination of financial aid received, by institutional and student characteristics: B Average amount of financial aid received by undergraduates who received various combinations of financial aid, by institutional and student characteristics: Aid by institution type 3.6-A Percentage of undergraduates in public 4-year institutions receiving financial aid according to type and source of aid, by student characteristics: B Average amount of financial aid received by aided undergraduates in public 4-year institutions according to type and source of aid, by student characteristics: A Percentage of undergraduates in public 2-year institutions receiving financial aid according to type and source of aid, by student characteristics: B Average amount of financial aid received by aided undergraduates in public 2-year institutions according to type and source of aid, by student characteristics: A Percentage of undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions receiving financial aid according to type and source of aid, by student characteristics: B Average amount of financial aid received by aided undergraduates in private not-forprofit 4-year institutions according to type and source of aid, by student characteristics: xix
21 List of Tables Table Page Section 4: Net Price and Need Net price of attendance 4.1-A Average net price (total price of attendance less total aid) of postsecondary education among undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: B 4.1-C Average total price of attendance less all grants among undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: Average total price of attendance less federal grants among undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: D Average tuition and fees less grants among undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: E 4.1-F Average net price (total price of attendance less total aid) of postsecondary education among dependent undergraduates according to dependent student family income, by institutional and student characteristics: Average net price (total price of attendance less total aid) of postsecondary education among independent undergraduates according to independent student income, by institutional and student characteristics: G Average net price (total price of attendance less total aid) of postsecondary education among full-time, full-year undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: Financial aid need 4.2 Average federal expected family contribution (EFC) among undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: A Percentage of undergraduates with financial need for federal aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: B Average financial need among undergraduates who have need according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: A Percentage of undergraduates who have remaining financial need after receiving financial aid (if any) according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: xx
22 List of Tables Table 4.4-B Page Average amount of remaining financial need among undergraduates who have need after receiving financial aid (if any) according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: A Percentage of undergraduates with need who received financial aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: B Average amount of financial aid received by undergraduates who had need according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: Section 5: Student Characteristics 5.1-A Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to dependency status, by institutional and student characteristics: B 5.1-C Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to attendance pattern, by institutional and student characteristics: Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to local residence, by institutional and student characteristics: A Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to race/ethnicity, by institutional and student characteristics: B Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to gender and citizenship, by institutional and student characteristics: Percentage distribution of dependent undergraduates according to parents income, by institutional and student characteristics: Percentage distribution of independent undergraduates according to students income, by institutional and student characteristics: Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to type of institution attended, by institutional and student characteristics: Appendix Table B1 Standard errors for table 3.1-A: Percentage of undergraduates receiving aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: xxi
23 List of Figures Figure Page Executive Summary Figures A Percentage distribution of all undergraduates according to aid package, percentage receiving different types of aid, and average amount of aid for aided students: iii B C D E Percentage distribution of full-time, full-year undergraduates according to aid package, percentage receiving different types of aid, and average amount of aid for aided students: Average tuition and fees, nontuition expenses, and total price of attendance for fulltime, full-year undergraduates, by type of institution attended: Percentage of all undergraduates receiving any aid, grants, or loans and average amounts received by aided students, by type of institution attended: Percentage of all undergraduates receiving grants or loans and average amounts received by aided students, by source of funds: iv v vi vii Text Figures 1 Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to aid package, percentage receiving different types of aid, and average amount of aid for aided students: Average tuition and fees, nontuition expenses, and total price of attendance for fulltime, full-year undergraduates, by type of institution attended: Percentage distribution of all undergraduates and full-time, full-year undergraduates by total price of attendance: Percentage of undergraduates receiving any aid and any loans and average amounts received by aided students, by price of attendance: Percentage of dependent and independent undergraduates receiving any aid and any loans and average amounts received by aided students, by family income: xxii
24 List of Figures Figure Page 6 Percentage of all undergraduates receiving any aid, grants, or loans and average amounts receiving by aided students, by type of institution attended: Percentage of full-time, full-year undergraduates receiving any aid, grants, or loans and average amounts received by aided students, by type of institution attended: Percentage of all undergraduates receiving grants or loans and average amounts received by aided students, by source of funds: Percentage of all dependent undergraduates receiving grants and average amounts received by aided students according to dependent family income, by source of grant funds: Percentage of all undergraduates receiving grants and average grant amount received by aided students according to type of institution, by source of grant funds: Percentage distribution of dependent and independent Stafford loan borrowers with subsidized loans, unsubsidized loans, or both according to Stafford combination and average loan amounts, by family income: Percentage distribution of undergraduates in public 2-year institutions borrowing and receiving other aid: Percentage distribution of undergraduates in public 4-year institutions borrowing and receiving other aid: Percentage distribution of undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions borrowing and receiving other aid: Percentage distribution of undergraduates in private for-profit institutions borrowing and receiving other aid: xxiii
25 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
26 Financial Aid in Introduction During the academic year, about 16.5 million undergraduates were enrolled in postsecondary institutions for all or part of the year, as full- or part-time students. More than onehalf (55 percent) of them received some type of financial aid from federal, state, institutional, or other sources to meet their educational expenses. The average amount received was $6,200 (figure 1). The two major types of financial aid awarded to students are grants and loans. In , 44 percent of all undergraduates received grants (the average amount received was about $3,500). Grants do not need to be repaid; they include scholarships, which is a term usually applied to grants that are either wholly or partly awarded on some merit basis. Student loans, which are aid that does need to be repaid, were received by 29 percent of all undergraduates, and the average student loan was $5,100. In addition, 5 percent of the undergraduates held workstudy jobs, earning an average of $1,700. Seven percent received other types of aid, including veteran s benefits, job training and vocational rehabilitation funds, and federal PLUS loans to parents. In this report, PLUS loans to parents are kept separate from loans to students; in practice, however, few students had PLUS loans assumed by their parents but had no other type of loan. 1 Many of the students received more than one type of financial aid in their aid package. 2 As shown in figure 1, student loans were the only type of financial aid received for 7 percent of all undergraduates; 22 percent took out loans but were also awarded grants or other aid; and 27 percent had financial aid packages that included grants, work-study, or other aid, but no loans. Those who had aid packages including loans and other aid received an average of $10,600 in total financial aid, compared with $5,200 for those who had only loans and $2,900 for those who did not have loans. 1 About 1 percent of all students receiving federal loans received only PLUS loans (Compendium table 1.5-A). 2 Among aided students, 40 percent received only grants and 13 percent received only loans (Compendium table 3.5-A). 1
27 Financial Aid in Figure 1. Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to aid package, percentage receiving different types Figure 1. of aid, and average amount of aid for aided students: ALL UNDERGRADUATES No aid 45% 27% 22% Aided, no loans $2,900 Loans and other aid $10,600 Aid type Percent Average Grants 44 $3,500 Loans 29 $5,100 Work-study 5 $1,700 Other 7 $4,700 Any aid 55 $6,200 7% Loans only $5,200 FULL-TIME, FULL-YEAR UNDERGRADUATES* No aid Loans only $5,600 28% 10% 27% 36% Aided, no loans $4,700 Loans and other aid $12,100 Aid type Percent Average Grants 59 $4,900 Loans 45 $5,400 Work-study 11 $1,700 Other 10 $6,000 Any aid 73 $8,500 *Represents 39 percent of all undergraduates. NOTE: Based on Compendium tables 1.1-A, 1.2-A, 3.1-A, and 3.1-B. Loans only include loans to students. Parent PLUS loans are categorized as other aid. Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:2000). 2
28 Financial Aid in Thirty-nine percent of all undergraduates were enrolled full time for a full academic year, 3 but the proportion varied by type of institution. At both public and private not-for-profit 4-year institutions, more than one-half of the undergraduates attended full time for the full year (55 and 61 percent, respectively), compared with about one-fifth (19 percent) at public 2-year institutions. 4 Within an institution, the full-time, full-year students usually have the highest educational expenses because they are charged the full tuition price and incur other educationrelated expenses for a full academic year. Figure 1 shows that among undergraduates who were enrolled full time for a full academic year, about three-fourths (73 percent) relied on some type of financial aid to help pay for their postsecondary education, receiving an average of $8,500. Tuition and the Price of Attendance in The price to the student of attending a postsecondary institution has numerous components, the most basic being the tuition and fees 5 charged by the institutions for instruction and services. The average tuition and fees for full-time, full-year undergraduates in varied by type of institution (figure 2). Tuition and fees averaged about $1,600 at public 2-year institutions, $4,300 at public 4-year institutions, $8,900 at private for-profit institutions, and $15,000 at private not-for-profit 4-year institutions. 6 The lower tuition at the public institutions reflects the direct subsidies that institutions receive from the states to meet a part of their operating costs. The tuition at any particular institution within these sectors may vary considerably from these averages. Students enrolled part time or for only part of the year are charged less tuition than fulltime, full-year students. 7 In addition to tuition and fees, the total price of attendance includes other expenses related to enrollment, such as books and supplies, room and board, transportation, and personal expenses during the academic year. The estimates of these nontuition expenses are based on student budgets prepared annually by the institutional financial aid offices, which use them in determining the financial aid need of students. The student budgets are adjusted by the institution to reflect differences in housing, transportation, and other expenses of different types of students. For example, students living at home with their parents will generally have lower nontuition expenses; a single parent with children to care for will have higher expenses. As shown in figure 3 Full-time is usually 12 or more credit hours of classes. A full academic year is usually 9 10 months. 4 Compendium table Usually the term tuition is used to designate the basic price of instruction, while required fees designate the price of providing other campus services. However, many institutions make no distinction and use the term fee for both. 6 These averages may differ from those based on IPEDS data in other NCES publications because they are weighted by institutional enrollments and include additional out-of-jurisdiction fees charged to nonresidents by public institutions. 7 Compendium table
Availability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says
Wednesday, October 2, 2002 http://chronicle.com/daily/2002/10/2002100206n.htm Availability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says As the average price of attending
More informationDescriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS Statistical Analysis Report June 994 Descriptive Summary of 989 90 Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry Contractor Report Robert Fitzgerald Lutz
More informationTrends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing
Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing 2012 NYSFAAA Conference Katrina Delgrosso Senior Educational Manager Agenda What is the College Board Advocacy & Policy Center? Trends in College Pricing
More informationFinancial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017
CU-Boulder financial aid, degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 Page 1 Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017 Contents
More informationTRENDS IN. College Pricing
2008 TRENDS IN College Pricing T R E N D S I N H I G H E R E D U C A T I O N S E R I E S T R E N D S I N H I G H E R E D U C A T I O N S E R I E S Highlights 2 Published Tuition and Fee and Room and Board
More informationAbout the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center
15% 10 +5 0 5 Tuition and Fees 10 Appropriations per FTE ( Excluding Federal Stimulus Funds) 15% 1980-81 1981-82 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93
More informationGRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year
Financial Aid Information for GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year 2017-2018 Your Financial Aid Award This booklet is designed to help you understand your financial aid award, policies for receiving aid and
More informationTrends in College Pricing
Trends in College Pricing 2009 T R E N D S I N H I G H E R E D U C A T I O N S E R I E S T R E N D S I N H I G H E R E D U C A T I O N S E R I E S Highlights Published Tuition and Fee and Room and Board
More informationCollege Pricing. Ben Johnson. April 30, Abstract. Colleges in the United States price discriminate based on student characteristics
College Pricing Ben Johnson April 30, 2012 Abstract Colleges in the United States price discriminate based on student characteristics such as ability and income. This paper develops a model of college
More informationEDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT By 2030, at least 60 percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 will have a postsecondary credential or degree. Target: Increase the percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 with a postsecondary credential.
More informationHigher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017
November 3, 2017 Higher Education Pennsylvania s diverse higher education sector - consisting of many different kinds of public and private colleges and universities - helps students gain the knowledge
More informationEDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT By 2030, at least 60 percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 will have a postsecondary credential or degree. Target: Increase the percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 with a postsecondary credential.
More informationSuggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for
MAINE Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Research on Higher Education, Graduate School of Education,
More informationAlex Robinson Financial Aid
Alex Robinson Financial Aid Image Source: https://www.google.com/search?q=college+decisions+and+financial+fit&espv=2&biw=1366&bih=643&source=lnms&tb m=isch&sa=x&ved=0cagq_auoa2ovchmi6vt40tknxwivee6ich2ipgcw#imgrc=45cmbyr3nan8gm%3a
More informationWhat You Need to Know About Financial Aid
What You Need to Know About Financial Aid 2018-2019 Topics We Will Discuss Tonight What is financial aid? Cost of attendance (COA) Expected family contribution (EFC) Financial need Categories, types, and
More informationTrends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016
Trends in Higher Education Series Trends in College Pricing 2016 See the Trends in Higher Education website at trends.collegeboard.org for figures and tables in this report and for more information and
More information2010 DAVID LAMB PHOTOGRAPHY RIT/NTID FINANCIAL AID AND SCHOLARSHIPS
2010 DAVID LAMB PHOTOGRAPHY RIT/NTID FINANCIAL AID AND SCHOLARSHIPS An Exceptional Value An Outstanding Investment An Affordable Choice You ve decided that you re looking for the quality, reputation and
More informationUCLA Affordability. Ronald W. Johnson Director, Financial Aid Office. May 30, 2012
UCLA Affordability Ronald W. Johnson Director, Financial Aid Office May 30, 2012 1 UC is affordable First, Students must: Apply for admission in November File FAFSA and GPA Verification Form between January
More informationBENG Simulation Modeling of Biological Systems. BENG 5613 Syllabus: Page 1 of 9. SPECIAL NOTE No. 1:
BENG 5613 Syllabus: Page 1 of 9 BENG 5613 - Simulation Modeling of Biological Systems SPECIAL NOTE No. 1: Class Syllabus BENG 5613, beginning in 2014, is being taught in the Spring in both an 8- week term
More informationPaying for. Cosmetology School S C H O O L B E AU T Y. Financing your new life. beautyschoolnetwork.com pg 1
Paying for Cosmetology School B E AU T Y S C H O O L Financing your new life. beautyschoolnetwork.com beautyschoolnetwork.com pg 1 B E AU T Y S C H O O L Table of Contents How to Pay for Cosmetology School...
More informationWASHINGTON COLLEGE SAVINGS
WASHINGTON COLLEGE SAVINGS EVERY CHILD DESERVES TO GO TITLE BUILDING STUDENT SUCCESS ONE DOLLAR AT A TIME Jacquelyne Ferrado WFAA Conference October 12, 2017 Presenters Event Date SESSION GOALS Raise Awareness
More informationAccounting 380K.6 Accounting and Control in Nonprofit Organizations (#02705) Spring 2013 Professors Michael H. Granof and Gretchen Charrier
Accounting 380K.6 Accounting and Control in Nonprofit Organizations (#02705) Spring 2013 Professors Michael H. Granof and Gretchen Charrier 1. Office: Prof Granof: CBA 4M.246; Prof Charrier: GSB 5.126D
More informationData Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)
Institutional Research and Assessment Data Glossary This document is a collection of terms and variable definitions commonly used in the universities reports. The definitions were compiled from various
More informationThe Impacts of Regular Upward Bound on Postsecondary Outcomes 7-9 Years After Scheduled High School Graduation
Contract No.: EA97030001 MPR Reference No.: 6130-800 The Impacts of Regular Upward Bound on Postsecondary Outcomes 7-9 Years After Scheduled High School Graduation Final Report January 2009 Neil S. Seftor
More informationFinancial Aid & Merit Scholarships Workshop
Financial Aid & Merit Scholarships Workshop www.admissions.umd.edu ApplyMaryland@umd.edu 301.314.8385 1.800.422.5867 Merit Scholarship Review James B. Massey Jr. Office of Undergraduate Admissions Financing
More informationMcDonald's Corporation
McDonald's Corporation Case Writeup Individual Case # 2 The George Washington University Executive MBA Program EMBA 220: Operations Management Professor Sanjay Jain, Ph.D. February 20, 2010 Robert Paul
More informationNovember 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:
The Honorable Kevin Brady The Honorable Richard Neal Chairman Ranking Member Ways and Means Committee Ways and Means Committee United States House of Representatives United States House of Representatives
More informationNATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is the core postsecondary education data collection program for the NCES. It is a single, comprehensive
More informationFinancial Aid. Financial Aid. Course Descriptions
Monmouth University believes that financing a student s education should be a cooperative effort between the student and the institution. To that end, the staff of the Financial Aid Office is available
More informationPaying for College. Marla Lewis Office of Student Financial Aid
Paying for College Marla Lewis Office of Student Financial Aid What is financial aid? Financial Aid is any resource that can assist in offsetting the cost of attending college. What are the sources of
More informationSASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION
SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION Report March 2017 Report compiled by Insightrix Research Inc. 1 3223 Millar Ave. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan T: 1-866-888-5640 F: 1-306-384-5655 Table of Contents
More informationQs&As Providing Financial Aid to Former Everest College Students March 11, 2015
Qs&As Providing Financial Aid to Former Everest College Students March 11, 2015 Q. How is the government helping students affected by the closure of Everest College? A. Ontario is providing financial assistance
More informationRotary Club of Portsmouth
Rotary Club of Portsmouth Scholarship Application Each year the Rotary Club of Portsmouth seeks scholarship applications from high school seniors scheduled to graduate who will be attending a post secondary
More informationCHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24
CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24 INTRODUCTION Once state level policymakers have decided to implement and pay for CSR, one issue they face is simply how to calculate the reimbursements to districts
More informationLike much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.
36 37 POPULATION TRENDS Economy ECONOMY Like much of the country, suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession. Since bottoming out in the first quarter of 2010, however, the city has seen
More informationAn Introduction to School Finance in Texas
An Introduction to School Finance in Texas May 12, 2010 Sheryl Pace TTARA Research Foundation space@ttara.org (512) 472-8838 Texas Public Education System 1,300 school districts (#1 in the nation) 1,025
More informationSchool of Basic Biomedical Sciences College of Medicine. M.D./Ph.D PROGRAM ACADEMIC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
School of Basic Biomedical Sciences College of Medicine M.D./Ph.D PROGRAM ACADEMIC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Objective: The combined M.D./Ph.D. program within the College of Medicine at the University of
More informationQuestion No: 1 What must be considered with completing a needs analysis for a family saving for a child s tuition?
Volume: 443 Questions Question No: 1 What must be considered with completing a needs analysis for a family saving for a child s tuition? A. Where the child will go to college B. Where the family lives
More informationChris George Dean of Admissions and Financial Aid St. Olaf College
Chris George Dean of Admissions and Financial Aid St. Olaf College 1. Apply for a FSA ID 2. Collect the documents you ll need and File the FAFSA 3. File other materials, if required 4. Research scholarship
More informationValue of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University
Materials linked from the 5/12/09 OSU Faculty Senate agenda 1. Who Participates Value of Athletics in Higher Education March 2009 Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University Today, more
More informationInvest in CUNY Community Colleges
Invest in Opportunity Invest in CUNY Community Colleges Pat Arnow Professional Staff Congress Invest in Opportunity Household Income of CUNY Community College Students
More informationSouthern Wesleyan University 2017 Winter Graduation Exercises Information for Graduates and Guests (Updated 09/14/2017)
I. Ceremonies II. Graduation Timeline III. Graduation Day Schedule IV. Academic Regalia V. Alumni Receptions VI. Applause VII. Applications VIII. Appropriate Attire for Graduates IX. Baccalaureate X. Cameras,
More informationBest Colleges Main Survey
Best Colleges Main Survey Date submitted 5/12/216 18::56 Introduction page 1 / 146 BEST COLLEGES Data Collection U.S. News has begun collecting data for the 217 edition of Best Colleges. The U.S. News
More informationCouncil on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees
Bachelor's Degrees Institution 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 UK 3,988 4,238 4,540 UofL 2,821 2,832 2,705 EKU 2,508 2,532 2,559 MoSU 1,144 1,166 1,306 MuSU 1,469 1,512 1,696 NKU 2,143 2,214 2,196 WKU 2,751 2,704
More informationELMIRA BUSINESS INSTITUTE A CAREER COLLEGE FOUNDED 1858 VOLUME XVII CATALOG
ELMIRA BUSINESS INSTITUTE A CAREER COLLEGE FOUNDED 858 VOLUME XVII 206-207 CATALOG 858-206 Elmira Business Institute Elmira Campus Vestal Campus 0 N. Main Street 400 Vestal Rd. Elmira, NY 490 Vestal, NY
More informationDraft Budget : Higher Education
The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament Infor mation C entre l ogos. SPICe Briefing Draft Budget 2015-16: Higher Education 6 November 2014 14/79 Suzi Macpherson This briefing reports on funding
More informationHAMILTON. Viewing Education Loans Through A Myopic Lens PROJECT. The Brookings Institution. Advancing Opportunity, Prosperity and Growth
THE HAMILTON PROJECT Advancing Opportunity, Prosperity and Growth D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R 2 0 0 8-0 5 J U N E 2 0 0 8 Sima J. Gandhi Viewing Education Loans Through A Myopic Lens The Brookings Institution
More informationEARNING. THE ACCT 2016 INVITATIONAL SYMPOSIUM: GETTING IN THE FAST LANE Ensuring Economic Security and Meeting the Workforce Needs of the Nation
THE ACCT 2016 INVITATIONAL SYMPOSIUM: GETTING IN THE FAST LANE Ensuring Economic Security and Meeting the Workforce Needs of the Nation Discussion Papers 2016 Invitational Symposium LEARNING WHILE EARNING
More informationState Budget Update February 2016
State Budget Update February 2016 2016-17 BUDGET TRAILER BILL SUMMARY The Budget Trailer Bill Language is the implementing statute needed to effectuate the proposals in the annual Budget Bill. The Governor
More informationSwarthmore College Common Data Set
Swarthmore College Common Data Set 2015 2016 Office of Institutional Research Swarthmore College Common Data Set 2015-2016 Table of Contents Section Page A. General Information... 1 B. Enrollment and Persistence...
More informationDEVM F105 Intermediate Algebra DEVM F105 UY2*2779*
DEVM F105 Intermediate Algebra DEVM F105 UY2*2779* page iii Table of Contents CDE Welcome-----------------------------------------------------------------------v Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------xiii
More informationHow to Prepare for the Growing Price Tag
The Skyrocketing Cost of College How to Prepare for the Growing Price Tag Ken O Connor, Director of Student Advocacy, Fynanz, Inc. Mike Sabatino, CFP, Managing Director of Financial Planning and Education,
More informationLongitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers
F I N A L R E P O R T Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers July 8, 2014 Elias Walsh Dallas Dotter Submitted to: DC Education Consortium for Research and Evaluation School of Education
More informationProgram Integrity Regs: Clock Hour Programs. To Be or Not To Be a Clock Hour Program? NCASFAA Fall Conference. November 7-9, 2011.
Program Integrity Regs: To Be or Not To Be a Clock Hour Program? Clock Hour Programs Presented by: David Bartnicki Federal Training Officer 404-974-9312; david.bartnicki@ed.gov 3 Program Integrity Regulations
More informationNATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS Palm Desert, CA The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is the nation s core postsecondary education data collection program. It is a single,
More informationFINANCING YOUR COLLEGE EDUCATION
FINANCING YOUR COLLEGE EDUCATION Columbia High School October 4, 2017 Presenter Douglas Wilson Kean University 1 Overview Types of Assistance Scholarship Information Applying for Need-Based Aid Eligibility
More informationEducation in Armenia. Mher Melik-Baxshian I. INTRODUCTION
Education in Armenia Mher Melik-Baxshian I. INTRODUCTION Education has always received priority in Armenia a country that has a history of literacy going back 1,600 years. From the very beginning the school
More informationMontana's Distance Learning Policy for Adult Basic and Literacy Education
Montana's Distance Learning Policy for Adult Basic and Literacy Education 2013-2014 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction Page 3 A. The Need B. Going to Scale II. Definitions and Requirements... Page 4-5
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE HALAMAN PENGESAHAN PERNYATAAN NASKAH SOAL TUGAS AKHIR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOREWORD
TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE HALAMAN PENGESAHAN PERNYATAAN NASKAH SOAL TUGAS AKHIR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOREWORD TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES LIST OF APPENDICES LIST OF
More informationAgreement BETWEEN. Board of Education OF THE. Montebello Unified School District AND. Montebello Teachers Association
Agreement BETWEEN Board of Education OF THE Montebello Unified School District AND Montebello Teachers Association 2013-2016 (including 2014-2015 Updates) ARTICLE NO. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. PREAMBLE
More informationFederal Update. Angela Smith, Training Officer U.S. Dept. of ED, Federal Student Aid WHITE HOUSE STUDENT LOAN INITIATIVES
Federal Update 1 WHITE HOUSE STUDENT LOAN INITIATIVES 2 SPECIAL DIRECT CONSOLIDATION LOANS 3 For Discussion/Training purposes ONLY. 1 Regular Direct Consolidation Loan Borrowers with any federal student
More informationFinancing Education In Minnesota
Financing Education In Minnesota 2016-2017 Created with Tagul.com A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department August 2016 Financing Education in Minnesota 2016-17
More informationUpdated: December Educational Attainment
Updated: Educational Attainment Among 25- to 29-year olds, the proportions who have attained a high school education, some college, or a bachelor s degree are all rising, according to longterm trends.
More informationSTUDENT 16/17 FUNDING GUIDE LOANS & GRANTS FOR FULL-TIME POST-SECONDARY STUDIES
STUDENT LOANS & GRANTS FUNDING GUIDE FOR FULL-TIME POST-SECONDARY STUDIES 16/17 CONTENTS The information and amounts in the Student Loans & Grants Funding Guide are current as of June 2016. All amounts
More informationBackground Information. Instructions. Problem Statement. HOMEWORK INSTRUCTIONS Homework #3 Higher Education Salary Problem
Background Information Within higher education, faculty salaries have become a contentious issue as tuition rates increase and state aid shrinks. Competitive salaries are important for recruiting top quality
More informationAUTHORIZED EVENTS
AUTHORIZED EVENTS 2017-18 STUDENT ELIGIBILITY Slide Handout CREDENTIALED TRAINING 2010 2017 by National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators (NASFAA). All rights reserved. NASFAA has prepared
More informationFaculty Athletics Committee Annual Report to the Faculty Council September 2014
Faculty Athletics Committee Annual Report to the Faculty Council September 2014 This annual report on the activities of the Faculty Athletics Committee (FAC) during the 2013-2014 academic year was prepared
More informationTHE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF EXETER
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF EXETER Report prepared by Viewforth Consulting Ltd www.viewforthconsulting.co.uk Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Background to the Study... 6 Data Sources
More informationFor information only, correct responses are listed in the chart below. Question Number. Correct Response
THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 4GRADE 4 ELEMENTARY-LEVEL SCIENCE TEST JUNE 207 WRITTEN TEST FOR TEACHERS ONLY SCORING KEY AND RATING GUIDE Note: All schools (public, nonpublic, and charter) administering
More informationTest Administrator User Guide
Test Administrator User Guide Fall 2017 and Winter 2018 Published October 17, 2017 Prepared by the American Institutes for Research Descriptions of the operation of the Test Information Distribution Engine,
More informationCreating a Culture of Transfer
J. Luke Wood, Carlos Nevarez, and Adriel A. Hilton Creating a Culture of Transfer Dr. J. Luke Wood is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Administration, Rehabilitation, and Postsecondary Education
More informationIs College Worth It? Understanding The Costs And Benefits of College
Is College Worth It? Understanding The Costs And Benefits of College Understanding the Costs & Benefits of College A lagging economy and skyrocketing university costs leave many Americans asking, Is college
More informationKnowledge management styles and performance: a knowledge space model from both theoretical and empirical perspectives
University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2004 Knowledge management styles and performance: a knowledge space model
More informationClock Hour Workshop. June 28, Clock Hours
Policies and Procedures For Clock-Hour Programs Disclaimer This is general information only. Important This is no substitute for the Federal Student Aid Handbook, the related regulations or the statute.
More informationFacts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning
Facts and Figures 2008-2009 Office of Institutional Research and Planning Office of Institutional Research Fall 2009 Facts at a Glance Credit Headcount Enrollments Headcount Ethnicity Headcount Percent
More informationFinancing Public Colleges and Universities in an Era of State Fiscal Constraints
Financing Public Colleges and Universities in an Era of State Fiscal Constraints Edith F. Behr, Vice President/Senior Credit Officer Moody s Higher Education & Not-for-Profit Team edith.behr@moodys.com
More informationSAMPLE AFFILIATION AGREEMENT
SAMPLE AFFILIATION AGREEMENT AFFILIATION AGREEMENT FOR USE WITH A FOREIGN STUDY PROGRAM W I T N E S S E T H and WHEREAS, cordial relations exist between the United Stated of America and France; WHEREAS,
More informationPost-Master s Certificate in. Leadership for Higher Education
Post-Master s Certificate in Leadership for Higher Education Effective July 10, 2017 Post-Master s Certificate in Leadership for Higher Education This post-master s certificate program is offered in the
More informationUniversity of Arizona
Annual Report Submission View Questionnaire (Edit) University of Arizona Annual Report Submission for the year 2009. Report has been submitted 1 times. Report was last submitted on 11/30/2009 7:12:09 PM.
More informationCatalog. Table of Contents
School of Online Studies & Graduate School 2012-2013 Catalog Table of Contents Admissions... 4 Financial Information... 7 Costs for 2012-2013... 7 Financial Aid.... 9 General Academic Information... 13
More informationMichigan and Ohio K-12 Educational Financing Systems: Equality and Efficiency. Michael Conlin Michigan State University
Michigan and Ohio K-12 Educational Financing Systems: Equality and Efficiency Michael Conlin Michigan State University Paul Thompson Michigan State University October 2013 Abstract This paper considers
More informationTACOMA HOUSING AUTHORITY
TACOMA HOUSING AUTHORITY CHILDREN s SAVINGS ACCOUNT for the CHILDREN of NEW SALISHAN, Tacoma, WA last revised July 10, 2014 1. SUMMARY The Tacoma Housing Authority (THA) plans to offer individual development
More informationCOLLEGE ADMISSIONS Spring 2017
COLLEGE ADMISSIONS Spring 2017 mefa.org info@mefa.org (800) 449-MEFA (6332) Presented by: Joe Farragher, Ed.D. jfarragher@comcast.net MASSACHUSETTS EDUCATIONAL FINANCING AUTHORITY About MEFA Not-for-profit
More informationCHAPTER XI DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
Application No: A.1-09-00 Exhibit No.: Witness: R. Austria Application of Southern California Gas Company (U 90 G) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 90 G) to Recover Costs Recorded in the Pipeline
More informationGraduate Division Annual Report Key Findings
Graduate Division 2010 2011 Annual Report Key Findings Trends in Admissions and Enrollment 1 Size, selectivity, yield UCLA s graduate programs are increasingly attractive and selective. Between Fall 2001
More informationTable of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.
Table of Contents Welcome........................................ 1 Basic Requirements for the Federal Work Study (FWS)/ Community Service/America Reads program............ 2 Responsibilities of All Participants
More informationVicki E. Murray, Ph.D. 10 Questions. State Legislators Should Ask About Higher Education
Vicki E. Murray, Ph.D. 10 Questions State Legislators Should Ask About Higher Education 10 Questions State Legislators Should Ask About Higher Education 2011 American Legislative Exchange Council All rights
More informationMaster of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration
Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in Leadership in Educational Administration Effective October 9, 2017 Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in Leadership in
More informationSCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018
The primary objective of the South Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities Legislative Strategic Plan is to establish an agenda and course of action for a program of education and advocacy on matters
More informationCIN-SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION
CATAWBA INDIAN NATION SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE 2014-2015 CIN-SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION The Catawba Indian Nation Higher Education Scholarship Committee Presents: THE CATAWBA INDIAN NATION SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM
More informationRIVERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent s Report Regular Meeting Board of School Directors April 20, 2015
RECOMMENDATIONS: I. General Obligation Bonds, Series A of 2015 RIVERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent s Report Regular Meeting Board of School Directors April 20, 2015 I recommend formal action authorizing
More informationOFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report
2014-2015 OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT Annual Report Table of Contents 2014 2015 MESSAGE FROM THE VICE PROVOST A YEAR OF RECORDS 3 Undergraduate Enrollment 6 First-Year Students MOVING FORWARD THROUGH
More informationMeasures of the Location of the Data
OpenStax-CNX module m46930 1 Measures of the Location of the Data OpenStax College This work is produced by OpenStax-CNX and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 The common measures
More informationAGENDA ITEM VI-E October 2005 Page 1 CHAPTER 13. FINANCIAL PLANNING
Page 1 CHAPTER 13. FINANCIAL PLANNING Subchapter F. FORMULA FUNDING AND TUITION CHARGED FOR REPEATED AND EXCESS HOURS OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS Section 13.100. Purpose. 13.101. Authority 13.102. Definitions.
More informationServing Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001
Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps Cambridge, MA Lexington, MA Hadley, MA Bethesda, MD Washington, DC Chicago, IL Cairo, Egypt Johannesburg, South Africa A Profile of AmeriCorps
More informationLIM College New York, NY
C O L L E G E P R O F I L E - O V E R V I E W LIM College New York, NY The Laboratory Institute of Merchandising, founded in 1939, is a private institute. Its facilities are located in Manhattan. Web Site
More informationTrends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals
1 Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals June 2017 Idahoans have long valued public higher education, recognizing its importance
More informationA. General Information
A1 Address Information A1 Name of College/University: University of Michigan A1 Mailing Address: A1 City/State/Zip/Country: Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1817 A1 Street Address (if different): A1 City/State/Zip/Country:
More informationInternational Perspectives on Retention and Persistence
Walden University ScholarWorks Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Publications Academic and Administrative Units 6-2014 International Perspectives on Retention and Persistence Gary J. Burkholder
More informationEconomics 201 Principles of Microeconomics Fall 2010 MWF 10:00 10:50am 160 Bryan Building
Economics 201 Principles of Microeconomics Fall 2010 MWF 10:00 10:50am 160 Bryan Building Professor: Dr. Michelle Sheran Office: 445 Bryan Building Phone: 256-1192 E-mail: mesheran@uncg.edu Office Hours:
More information