COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL

Transcription

1 1 BIBLIOGRAPHY Aljaafreh, A. & J. P. Lantolf. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal 78: Antón, M. (2003). Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Washington, D.C., March, Brown, A. & R. A. Ferrara (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In Culture, communication and cognition. Vygotskian perspectives. J. V. Wertsch (Ed.). Cambridge. Cambridge University Budoff, M. (1968). Learning potential as a supplementary testing procedure. In Learning Disorders. Vol. 3. J. Hellmuth (Ed.). Seattle, WA: Special Child. Budoff, M. & M. Friedman. (1964). Learning potential as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded. Journal of Consulting Psychology 28: Carlson, J.S. & K. H. Weidl. (1992). Principles of dynamic assessment: The application of a specific model. Learning and Individual Differences 4: Carlson, J. & K. H. Wiedl. (2000). The validity of dynamic assessment. In Dynamic assessment: prevailing models and applications. C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky s analysis of learning and instruction. In Vygotsky s educational theory in cultural context. A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Campione, J. C., A. L. Brown, R. A. Ferrera, & N. R. Bryant. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Implications for individual differences and learning. In Children s learning in the zone of proximal development. B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.). San Francisco: Jossy-Bass. Dillon, R. & J. S. Carlson. (1978). Testing for competence in three ethnic groups. Educational and Psychological Measurement 38: Feuerstein, R., Y. Rand, & M. B. Hoffman. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park

2 2 Feuerstein, R. Y. Rand, M. B. Hoffman, & R. Miller. (1980). Instrumental enrichment. Baltimore, MD: University Park Feuerstein, R., Y. Rand, & J. E. Rynders. (1988). Don t accept me as I am. Helping retarded performers excel. New York: Plenum. Forman, E., A. N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.). (1993). Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics for children s development. Oxford: Oxford University Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly 37: Guthke, J. (1982). The learning test concept An alternative to the traditional static intelligence test. The German Journal of Psychology 6: Guthke, J., A. Heinrich, & M. Caruso. (1986). The diagnostic program of syntactical rule and vocabulary acquisition A contribution to the psychodiagnosis of foreign language learning ability. In Human memory and cognitive capabilities. Mechanisms and performances. F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Harré, R. & G. Gillett The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Hedegaard, M. (1990). The zone of proximal development as a basis for instruction. In Vygotsky and education. Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. L. Moll (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University John-Steiner, V., C. P. Panofsky, & L. W. Smith (Eds.) Sociocultural approaches to language and literacy. An interactionist perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Kar, B. C., U. N. Dash, J. P. Das, & J. Carlson. (1993). Two experiments on the dynamic assessment of planning. Learning and Individual Differences 5: Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Kozulin, A., P. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.). (2003). Vygotsky s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University

3 3 Lantolf, J. P. & G. Appel. (Eds.). (1994). Vygotskyian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Lantolf, J. P. & M. E. Poehner. (2004). Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: Lantolf, J. P. & S. L. Thorne. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Lee, C. D. & P. Smagorinsky. (Eds.). (2000). Vygotskyan perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner s guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford. Lidz, C. S. & B. Gindis. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. In Vygotsky s educational theory in cultural context. A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Luria, A.R. (1961). An objective approach to the study of the abnormal child. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry: A Journal of Human Behavior 31: Moll, L. (Ed.). (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Nassaji, H. & M. Swain. (2000). A Vygotskyan perspective towards corrective feedback in L2: the effect of random vs. negotiated help on the acquisition of English articles. Language Awareness 9: Olsen, D The world on paper. Oxford: Oxford University Palincsar, A. S., A. L. Brown & J. C. Campione. (1991). Dynamic assessment. In Handbook on the assessment of learning disabilities. H. L. Swanson (Ed.). Austin, TX: ProEd. Poehner, M.E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of oral proficiency among advanced L2 learners of French. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA.

4 4 Poehner, M.E. & J.P. Lantolf. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research 9: Ratner, C. (2006). Cultural psychology. A perspective on psychological functioning and social reform. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum. Sternberg, R. J. & E. L. Grigorenko. (2002). Dynamic testing. The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Torrance, H. & J. Pryor. (1998). Investigating formative assessment: teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. Buckingham: Open University Valsiner, J. & R. van der Veer (1993). The encoding of distance: The concept of the zone of proximal development and its interpretations. In The development and meaning of psychological distance. R. R. Cocking & K. A. Renninger (Eds.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. van der Veer, R. & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell. van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning. A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Vygotsky, L. S Mind in society. The development of higher psychological functions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. (A. Kozulin, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Vygotsky, L.S. (1993). The diagnostics of development and the pedological clinic for difficult children. In The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky vol..2. The fundamentals of defectology. Abnormal psychology and learning disabilities. R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.). New York: Plenum Wells, G. & G. Claxton. (Eds.) Learning for life in the 21 st Century. Oxford: Blackwell. Wells, G Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Wertsch, J.V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. In Children s learning in the zone of proximal development. B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.). San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.

5 5 Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Wozniak, R.H. (1980). Theory, practice, and the zone of proximal development in Soviet psychoeducational research. Contemporary Educational Psychology 5: