SATHYABAMA UNIVERSITY (Established under section 3 of UGC Act, 1956) Established under Section 3 of the UGC Act, 1956 Jeppiaar Nagar, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Chennai 600 119, SATHYABAMA Tamilnadu. India. UNIVERSITY INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE CELL ACADEMIC AUDIT by QCM / School (For ---------------------------------) PART I PRELIMINARY SESSION 1. Name of the School and the Departments under School: 2. Contact Details of the School and its Departments: Telephone: Inter-com: Mobile: E-mail: 3. Date & Time of Visit: 4. Member(s) of Visiting Committee: i) ii) 5. a. Academic Programmes conducted at School: S. No Actual Total Name of the Programme Sanctioned Intake Number of Students UG PG UG PG UG PG b. Department wise list of Faculty: (Evidence to be c. Time Table for Odd (Even) semester for all the programmes and semesters: (Evidence to be 1
PART II ACADEMIC STANDARDS-At School Level S. No Particulars Weightage Marks Awarded Status of Faculty* (Programme wise Details) Teacher : Student Ratio 1 : S. No Programme Ratio Cadre Ratio 2 : S. No Programme Ratio 6. 25 Visiting Faculty: S. No Programme Ratio Number of UG / PG Courses Offered Number of Certificate Courses / Skill development courses offered Best Practices Identified at the School (Evidence to be embedded wherever necessary in the text via Hyperlinks) * Marking will be done proportionately and comparatively. 1 Teacher: Student Ratio UG Programme a : b (1 : 20), PG Programme a : b (1 : 15) 2 Cadre Ratio Cadre Ratio a : b : c (1 : 2 : 6 for both) 2
Quality of the Faculty (Evidence to be 7. a) How many of the faculty members possess degrees of M. Tech / M. Phil / NET / Doctorate: b) Number of Research Publications (Other than our University journals) National : i) Scopus: ii) WOS: iii) Others: International : iv) Scopus: v) WOS: vi) Others: (Preference shall be given to publication in Indexed and Refereed Journals) c) Impact Factor Score (Individual as well as average for the School) i. up to 0.5 ii. 0.5-1 iii. 1 to 2 iv. 2 to 5 d) FDPs / Conferences / Seminars attended by the faculty - National : - International : (weightage shall be given for one week FDPs) e) Funded Projects / Patents / Products f) Is the faculty imparting innovations in teaching methodology? i) Preparing the Course plan with details of number of lectures to be delivered on each unit of the curriculum. ii) Imparting instructions on each unit with the help of Power Point Presentations / models / demos / Home Assignments / Seminar / Debate / Quiz / Online Hunt / Cognitive Assessment through AV Medium iii) Providing the list of essential Books and articles / E-Tutorials to be read by the students. 3
g) Length of the Teaching Experience of the Faculty in the institute. 8. Tenure Number of Faculty More than years Between 7 to years Between 3 to 7 years Below 3 years h) Number of Doctorates registered and Degree awarded at the School i) Number of Research Supervisors at the School 9. Institutional support for Faculty Development (Evidence to be embedded in the text via Hyperlinks) a) Existence of awards like Best Teacher / Best Researcher etc. to motivate and recognize faculty s contribution. b) Evidence of Grant of Study Leave with pay for faculty to pursue higher studies or attend FDPs (other than summer/ winter vacations) c) Reimbursement of registration Fee and TA/ DA expenses along with special Casual Leave for participation in Conferences/ Seminars/ workshops, etc.. Quality of the Students (Evidence to be a) Orientation Programme b) Identification of Advanced Learners : Slow Learners: c) CAE I: CAE II: University Exam: d) Skill Development Courses: e) Co-Curricular / Extra Curricular Activities: f) Conferences / Workshops / Seminars / Symposia / Internship g) GRE/ TOEFL Examinations h) GATE Examination i) Scholarships- Inhouse j) Scholarships- Government-Merit, Single Girl Child, BC, etc k) Semester abroad programme l) MOOC Courses 4
University s End Term Evaluation (Evidence to be 11. 12. 13. a) No. of Faculty who participated in the Evaluation Process: b) No. of Days of Faculty Participation in Evaluation system: Total number of days of faculty participation in University s Evaluation system: Status of Library 3 : (Evidence to be embedded in the text via Hyperlinks) a) Number of Titles: b) Total Volumes of Books: c) Number of Journals: (Indian & International) d) Computerization/ Library automation: e) Internet connectivity: f) Book Bank Facility: g) Photocopier Facility, etc. a) Status of Laboratories : (Evidence to be i. Number of Laboratories : ii. Log Book of Major Equipments: iii. Stock Maintenance of Instruments / Equipments: iv. Upgradation as per new technological developments and requirements of the course curriculum: 3 Books: UG Programmes: Titles: Volume: PG Programmes: Titles: Volume: Journals for UG / PG Programmes (Indian : International : ) (Exclude Journals / Magazines Published by the University) 5
b) Status of Computer Labs 4 : (Evidence to be i. Availability of licensed software(s) as per the course curriculum: ii. Number of computer labs: iii. Number of PCs: 13. iv. Details of configuration: v. Available software(s) and Hardware(s): vi. Details of Printers/ CD Writers: vii. Internet Connectivity: viii. Upgradation as per new technological developments: 14. c) Status of Funded Labs Co-curricular Activities conducted by the School: (Evidence to be embedded in the text via Hyperlinks) a) Conferences: i) National: ii) International: b) Seminars: i) Workshops: Ii) Orientation Programmes: c) FDPs organized : i) One week Duration: ii) Less than one week Duration: d) Guest Talks / Guest Lectures e) MDPs organized : f) Skill Upgradation Programmes: 15. 16. Publications in our University Journals: (Evidence to be embedded in the text via Hyperlinks) Students Personality Development related activities: (Such as Mock Interviews, Group / Panel Discussions, Workshops, Role Plays, Competitions etc.) i) ii) iii) iv) v) 5 4 UG Programme 1 : 6 PG Programme 1 : 3 6
Placement Activities: (Evidence to be No. of companies visited the campus: 17. No. of placements offered: Average salary offered: i) On campus placements (%): ii) Off campus placements (%): Existence of Training & Placement Office in the Institute: Other facilities available in the School: (Evidence to be embedded in the text via Hyperlinks) 18. a) Feedback from the industry b) Feedback from the students and Alumni (Based on interaction with the alumni and students on parameters like teaching environment in the campus, support for conducting extra-curricular activities such as field visits, cultural festivals etc, administrative support, career guidance and counseling, support for training and placement, student s interaction with experts from industry and academia) c) Consultancy Projects / In-house Projects (other than academic programme) handled by Staff Members and Students d) Other measures like Green Measures, Energy Conservations, etc. 7
PART III Overall Observations and Recommendations 19. Total Marks secured: (Out of 200) 20. Overall Observations and Recommendations: Signature of Evaluator (QCM / School) Note: 1. Serial no.5b should also contain handling classes for, Responsibility other than academic, etc., 2. The information provided under serial no. (c), 11 should match with the record at CoE s Office. 3. The information provided under Serial No. 16 and 17 should match with the details given by the Placement Cell. 4. The Weightage mentioned in this Academic Audit Report Format is purely for Internal Evaluation. 8