2016-2017 Report Card for Barnesville High School SCHOOL GRADE Coming in 2018 DISTRICT GRADE Achievement The Achievement component represents the number of students who passed the state tests and how well they performed on them. Performance Index Value Added 63.3%... Overall... Indicators Met...... D F D Progress The Progress component looks closely at the growth that all students are making based on their past performances. Gifted... Students with Disabilities... Lowest 20% in Achievement... A A C C B Gap Closing The Gap Closing component shows how well schools are meeting the performance expectations for our most vulnerable populations of students in English language arts, math and graduation. F Graduation Rate The Graduation Rate component looks at the percent of students who are successfully finishing high school with a diploma in four or five years. A Annual Measurable Objectives 56.3%... F... Graduation Rates 95.6% of students graduated in 4 years... 93.0% of students graduated in 5 years... A B K-3 Literacy The K-3 Literacy component looks at how successful the school is at getting struggling readers on track to proficiency in third grade and beyond. Not Rated Prepared for Success Whether training in a technical field or preparing for work or college, the Prepared for Success component looks at how well prepared Ohio s students are for all future opportunities. D K-3 Literacy Improvement...NR Page 1 of 25
37.1 39.4 26.2 2.8 27.4 38.4 30.3 4.5 16.0 35.0 32.4 9.7 9.3 16.0 28.7 15.2 16.9 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 11.7 17.2 23.8 6.1 2016-2017 Report Card for Barnesville High School Achievement The Achievement component represents the number of students who passed the state tests and how well they performed on them. D GRADE D Performance Index 20 0 40 60 80 100 63.3% 76.0 of a possible 120.0 A = 90.0-10 B = 80.0-89.9% C = 70.0-79.9% D = 50.0-69.9% F = 0.0-49.9% Performance Index The Performance Index measures the test results of every student, not just those who score proficient or higher. There are six levels on the index and districts receive points for every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the more the points awarded in the district's index. This rewards schools and districts for improving the performance of all students, regardless of achievement level. Achievement Level Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Untested 28.1 Pct of Students 20.5 0.3 9.7 15.6 23.8 28.1 20.5 2.0 0.3 9.7 2.0 x x x x x x x Points for this Level 15.6 23.8 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 = = = = = = = Points Received 0.3 11.7 17.2 23.8 16.9 6.1 0.0 76.0 Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Limited Basic Untested 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 106.3 102.0 94.8 0.7 1.3 1.7 76.2 76.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Untested Performance Index Points Accelerated Performance Index Points Performance Index Trend Limited Performance Index Points Advanced Performance Index Points Basic Performance Index Points Advanced Plus Performance Index Points Proficient Performance Index Points Page 2 of 25
GRADE F Indicators Met Indicators Met measures the percent of students who have passed state tests. It also includes the gifted indicator. Test results are reported for each student in a grade and subject. The passage rate for each indicator is 80%. Indicators Met % 0 out of 10 40 60 A = B = C = D = F = 90.0-10 80.0-89.9% 70.0-79.9% 50.0-69.9% 0.0-49.9% 20 0 80 100 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 High School No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. This school does not have enough test results in 3rd, 4th, or 5th grade to display this table. No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. This school does not have enough test results in 6th, 7th, or 8th grade to display this table. Algebra I This Biologyschool 65.8% does not have English I 60.3% Test results to display this English II 25.7% enough Ohio Graduation table. 66.1% HS Geometry 33.3% Government 63.8% History 73.5% Math I Math II GIFTED INDICATOR Page 3 of 25
Achievement Levels by Grade Proficient Percent Trend by Grade 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 3rd Grade 75.5% 64.7% 63.8% 70.6% Reading Mathematics School District State Average 3rd Grade No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. 4th Grade 4th Grade 100% 80% 60% 68.0% 62.8% 85.0% 72.4% 94.0% 77.5% No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. 40% 20% 0% Reading Mathematics Social Studies School District State Average 5th Grade 5th Grade 100% 80% 60% 67.7% 59.3% 61.6% 79.6% 68.3% No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. 40% 41.7% 20% 0% Reading Mathematics Science School District State Average 6th Grade 6th Grade Page 4 of 25
80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 57.1% 60.2% 60.2% 46.8% 72.2% 64.0% Reading Mathematics Social Studies School District State Average No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. 7th Grade 7th Grade 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 59.2% 56.1% 48.9% 45.6% Reading Mathematics School District State Average No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. 8th Grade 8th Grade 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 70.4% 65.8% 58.6% 54.9% 50.3% 40.4% Reading Mathematics Science School District State Average No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. High School High School Page 5 of 25
80% 73.5% 72.1% 73.5% 70% 63.8% 68.7% 63.8% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 19.1% Government History Physical Science 66.1% 60.3% 66.1% 60.3% 58.3% 55.2% 45.3% 42.9% 35.9% 35.3% 33.3% 25.7% 38.1% 31.3% 65.8% 65.8% 61.1% English I English II Algebra I Geometry Math I Math II Biology School District State Average 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Government Proficiency % Trend Algebra I Proficiency % Trend 2015 2016 2017 History Proficiency % Trend Geometry Proficiency % Trend Physical Science Proficiency % Trend Math I Proficiency % Trend English I Proficiency % Trend Math II Proficiency % Trend English II Proficiency % Trend Biology Proficiency % Trend Page 6 of 25
Gifted Students The Gifted Students data and Indicator highlight the opportunities for and performance of gifted students. The dashboard answers several questions: How many students are identified as gifted and in what categories? How many of those students are receiving gifted services? How well are those gifted students performing? The Gifted Indicator measures whether opportunity and performance expectations are being met for gifted students. INDICATOR Not Met The Gifted Indicator is derived from three components: Gifted Value Added grade, the Performance Index for gifted students, and a Gifted Inputs score. Value Added Grade: Value Added Met?: Performance Index: 106.190 Performance Index Met?: A Met Gifted Value Added Schools must earn a Gifted Value Added grade of C or better to meet the Gifted Value Added component. Gifted Performance Index Not Met Overview Schools with at least 10 unique students in the Gifted Performance Index calculation must score 117.0 or better to meet the Gifted Performance Index component. Gifted Inputs 20 0 40 60 80 100 88.5% 106.190 of a possible 120.0 A = 90.0-10 B = 80.0-89.9% C = 70.0-79.9% D =50.0-69.9% F = 0.0-49.9% Performance Index The Performance Index calculation for gifted students. Only tests taken by students identified as gifted in that subject (e.g. gifted in Math and taking the Math test), or taken by students identified with Super Cognitive abilities regardless of test subject are included. Achievement Level Pct of Students Points for this Level Points Received Advanced Plus 0.0 x 1.3 = 0.0 Advanced 35.7 x 1.2 = 42.9 Accelerated 26.2 x 1.1 = 28.8 Proficient 31.0 x 1.0 = 31.0 Basic 4.8 x 0.6 = 2.9 Limited 2.4 x 0.3 = 0.7 Untested 0.0 x 0.0 = 0.0 106.190 Total Points: Gifted Inputs Met?: INDICATOR Not Met 62.0 Not Met Points are earned based on identification and services provided to gifted students. Schools must earn 80 or more points out of a possible 100 to meet the Gifted Inputs component. Gifted Indicator Final Result The Gifted Indicator is Met if none of the three components are Not Met. Gifted Inputs alone cannot determine the Gifted Indicator, however; if both the Value Added and Performance Index components are, then the Gifted Indicator is also. 31.0 4.8 2.4 26.2 35.7 Advanced Plus Advanced Accelarated Proficient Limited Basic Untested Page 7 of 25
Gifted Indicator The Gifted Inputs calculation assigns points based on the percentage of students identified and served in eight categories (factors). The points earned for each category are totaled to determine the final Met/Not Met determination for the Gifted Input component. Reading, Math, Science, Social Studies, and Superior Cognitive Abilities Visual/Performing Arts and Creative Thinking 77.2% 90.6% 14.3% 9.4% 8.5% Disadvantaged Students Minority Students 80.6% This chart is not displayed because there were not enough students to evaluate. 6.0% 10 13.3% Receiving Gifted Services Identified as Gifted, but not receiving services Not Identified as Gifted Page 8 of 25
Identification and Receiving Services These charts show the percentage of enrolled students that are identified as gifted and that are receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 16.0% 14.0% 15.6% No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. 12.0% 1 8.0% 6.0% 5.5% 4.0% 2.0% Creative Thinking 9.8% Math 4.3% 8.5% Reading 2.9% 3.0% 2.1% 0.6% Social Studies Science 5.1% 5.0% 4.2% Visual and Performing Arts Superior Cognitive This chart cannot be displayed because there were not enough students to evaluate. Identified Receiving Services Grades 4-8 Grades 9-12 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. 16.0% 14.0% 15.6% This chart cannot be displayed because there were not enough students to evaluate. 12.0% 1 8.0% 6.0% 5.5% 4.0% 2.0% Creative Thinking 9.8% Math 4.3% 8.5% Reading 2.9% 3.0% 2.1% 0.6% Social Studies Science 5.1% 5.0% 4.2% Visual and Performing Arts Superior Cognitive Identified Receiving Services Page 9 of 25
Identified and Receiving Services These charts show, of the students identified as gifted, the percentage of students receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 10 8 6 4 49.7% 51.5% 43.5% 10 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. This chart cannot be displayed because there were not enough students to evaluate. 2 31.2% Creative Thinking Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Visual and Performing Arts Grades 4-8 Grades 9-12 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. 10 10 This chart cannot be displayed because there were not enough students to evaluate. 8 6 4 2 31.2% 49.7% 51.5% 43.5% Creative Thinking Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Visual and Performing Arts Page 10 of 25
Progress The Progress component looks closely at the growth that all students are making based on their past performances. B GRADE A GRADE A GRADE C GRADE C GRADE NR Overall This measures the progress for all students in math, ELA, science and social studies using tests in grades 4-8 and some end-of-course exams. Gifted Students This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading, math, science, social studies and/or superior cognitive ability. Students in the Lowest 20% in Achievement This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 20% statewide in reading, math, science or social studies achievement. Students with Disabilities This measures the progress for students with disabilities. High Mobility For districts and schools with a mobility rate of 25% or higher, this measures the progress of a subset of students that have been in the district for at least two years. This measure will not be included in the Progress component grade. These tables show the Progress scores by test grade and subject for students in grades 4-8 and some end-of-course tests, and includes up to three years of data as available. Test Grade Progress Score English Language Arts Mathematics All Tests All Grades Dark Green Red Dark Green Test Grade Metrics Progress Score High School English I English II What do the colors mean? Dark Green Light Green Yellow Orange Red Dark Green Dark Green Progress Details Test Grade Metrics Progress Score High School Algebra I Geometry Math I Math II Students made more progress than expected significant evidence Students made more progress than expected moderate evidence Students made progress similar to the statewide expectation evidence Students made less progress than expected moderate evidence Students made less progress than expected significant evidence Red Red Red Orange The Progress Component measures how groups of students made progress as compared to the statewide expectation of growth. The expectation of growth is based on how students in the group performed, on average, compared to other students like them across the state Page 11 of 25
Progress vs. Performance Index This bubble chart shows the relationship between each subgroup's Performance Index results (horizontal axis) to the Value-Added letter grade (vertical axis). The size of the bubble represents the size of the student subgroup. A B Grade C Overall Students w/ Disabilities Lowest 20% Gifted High School Highly Mobile D F 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Performance Index Page 12 of 25
Gap Closing The Gap Closing component shows how well schools are meeting the performance expectations for our most vulnerable populations of students in English language arts, math and graduation. F GRADE F Annual Measurable Objectives Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of student groups to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achieves that goal in reading, math and graduation and emphasize any achievement gaps that exist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels. English Language Arts Math Graduation Rate AMO Points 40 60 20 0 80 100 73.5 31.3 95.6 56 56.3% A = 90.0-10 B = 80.0-89.9% C = 70.0-79.9% D = 60.0-69.9% F = 0.0-59.9% 73.3 60.6 30.1 20.0 95.6 0 20 40 60 80 100 White Econ Disadvantage All Students 0 20 40 60 80 100 White Econ Disadvantage All Students 0 20 40 60 80 100 All Students The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 2017 AMO for ELA is 77.1%, for Math is 72%, and for Graduation Rate is 85.1%. Subgroups with fewer than 30 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs. White Page 13 of 25
Graduation Rate The Graduation Rate component looks at the percent of students who are successfully finishing high school with a diploma in four or five years. A 4-Year Graduation Rate The 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2016 who graduated within four years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 2013 and graduated by 2016. 4-Year Rate 5-Year Rate GRADE A 95.6% A = 93.0-10 B = 89.0-92.9% C = 84.0-88.9% D = 79.0-83.9% F = 0.0-78.9% 20 0 40 60 80 100 100 80 60 95.6 94.8 83.6 100 80 60 93.0 93.0 85.6 5-Year Graduation Rate The 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2015 who graduated within five years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 2012 and graduated by 2016. GRADE B 93.0% A = 95.0-10 B = 90.0-94.9% C = 85.0-89.9% D = 80.0-84.9% F = 0.0-79.9% 20 0 40 60 80 100 40 20 0 School State Average District 40 20 0 School State Average District Page 14 of 25
Graduation Rate Trend 100% 98% 97.6% 96% 95.3% 95.6% 94% 93.0% 92% 90% 88.7% 88.9% 88% 87.7% 86% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 4-Year 5-Year Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because the necessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year. Page 15 of 25
K-3 Literacy The K-3 Literacy component looks at how successful the school is at getting struggling readers on track to proficiency in third grade and beyond. Not Rated GRADE NR 0 Students Moved to On Track - 0 RIMP Deductions In Your School... 0 Students Started Off Track Details of Measure K-3 Literacy Year 2 Improvement K-3 Literacy was not calculated for this school because there were not enough students to evaluate. This data is not displayed because there are not enough 40students 60 to 20evaluate. 80 Year 3 0 100 Year 1 0.0 A = 74.7-10 B = 49.3-74.6% C = 23.9-49.2% D = -1.5-23.8% F = <= -1.6% RIMP = Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plan. Districts are required to create a RIMP for students not on track to be proficient in English Language Arts by the end of 3rd grade. 10 Year 4 10 Remained Off Track Moved to On Track Remained Off Track Moved to On Track Page 16 of 25
Kindergarten Diagnostic First Grade Diagnostic Second Grade Diagnostic Third Grade Diagnostic Percentage On-Track in Reading Diagnostic K-3 Literacy was not calculated for this school because there were not enough students to evaluate. -800% -400% 0% 400% 800% On-Track Not On-Track Third Grade Reading Guarantee Ohio's Third Grade Reading Guarantee ensures that students are successful in reading before moving on to fourth grade. Schools must provide supports for struggling readers in early grades. If a child appears to be falling behind in reading, the school will immediately start a Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plan. The program ensures that every struggling reader gets the support he or she needs to learn and achieve. Students have multiple opportunities to meet promotion requirements including meeting a minimum promotion score on the third grade state reading tests given in the fall and spring. Students have an additional opportunity to take the state assessment in the summer, as well as a district-determined alternative assessment. The Parent Roadmap is available to help parents understand how the Third Grade Reading Guarantee applies to your child. How many third graders met the Third Grade Reading Guarantee requirements for promotion to 4th grade? This chart shows the overall percentage of students that were on-track/not-on-track for each grade level reading diagnostic in 2016-2017. How many third graders scored proficient on the state Reading test? Page 17 of 25
Prepared for Success Whether training in a technical field or preparing for work or college, the Prepared for Success component looks at how well prepared Ohio s students are for all future opportunities. D D 40% 60% 20% 80% 0% 100% Number of students that earned a remediation free score on all parts of the ACT or SAT, earned an honors diploma, and/or earned an industryrecognized credential Number of Students Point Value Points Earne d 42 1 42.0 How Prepared were Your 2015 and 2016 Graduating Classes? ACT: Participation 56.3% ACT: Remediation Free 22.7% SAT: Participation 3.4% SAT: Remediation Free 2.8% 26.3% A = B = C = D = F = 9-10 7-89.9% 45.0% - 69.9% 25.0% - 44.9% - 24.9% The number of "bonus" students that count an additional 0.3 bonus points each, because they did the above and also earned a 3 or higher on at least one AP exam; earned a 4 or higher on at least one IB exam; and/or earned at least three college credits before leaving high school 14 0.3 4.2 Total Points: Graduation Cohort: 46.2 176 Percentage: 26.3% Honors Diploma Industry-Recognized Credential Advanced Placement: Participation AP: Exam Score of 3 or Better 15.3% 0.6% Dual Enrollment Credit 14.8% International Baccalaureate IB: Exam Score of 4 or Better 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Note: These data represent students in the 4-year and 5-year graduation rates, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 2012 and 2013. Page 18 of 25
Outcomes after High School Graduation Districts and schools have long-term impacts on student outcomes. The Prepared for Success component provides information on how schools prepare students for different pathways of college and career success. It also provides insights on how those students do once they leave high school. What happens beyond the diploma is an important indicator of how well schools are preparing students. The University System of Ohio provides district reports on enrollment and remediation of high school graduates attending in-state, public colleges and universities. What Percentage of the 2014 Graduating Class Entered College within Two Years? 47.1% 52.9% 47.1% What Percentage of the 2010 Graduating Class Graduated from College within Six Years of Leaving High School? 34.2% 65.8% 34.2% Note: These data represent students in the 4-year and 5-year graduation rates, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 2012 and 2013. Page 19 of 25
Principal: Address: Ronald C. Clark 910 Shamrock Dr Barnesville OH 43713-9115 Career Technical Planning District: Phone: (740) 425-3617 Belmont-Harrison Area JVSD CTPD Directory information current as of the 2016-2017 Report Card publication date. Your School's Students Average Daily Enrollment: Enrollment by Subgroup 120% 339 Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Enrollment # Enrollment % 100% 98.7% Number of Limited English Proficiency Students Excluded from Accountability Calculations: Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged 334 33 100 98.7% 9.7% 29.5% 80% 60% 40% 20% 9.7% 29.5% -- Limited English Proficiency Migrant 0% = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group State and federal law require an annual assessment of Limited English Proficient (LEP) students to measure their English language proficiency. The Ohio English Language Proficiency Assessment (OELPA) is the assessment used in Ohio to gauge LEP students' growth in learning English. For information about your district's OELPA results, see the Department of Education's web site at http://education.ohio.gov. American Indian or Alaska... Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Migrant Economic Disadvantage Limited English Proficiency Page 20 of 25
Attendance Rate Chronic Absenteeism Rate: 11.4% All Students 94.3% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic 94.3% Students with Disabilities 93.9% Economic Disadvantage 92.6% Limited English Proficiency Migrant Male 94.4% Female 94.2% = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group 93.9% 94.2% 10 94.3% 94.3% 92.6% 94.4% 8 6 4 2 All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Female Students with Disabilities Migrant Asian or Pacific Islander Economic Disadvantage Male Attendance Rate is not shown if enrollment is less than 10. Page 21 of 25
Mobility Rates by Subgroup Student Mobility % All Students Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficiency Migrant = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group 600% A mobility rate chart cannot be displayed for this school because either there are not enough 0% students to evaluate in any subgroup or all calculated results are. 400% 200% -200% -400% -600% All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Economic Disadvantage Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Students with Disabilities Migrant White, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Multiracial Page 22 of 25
Your School's Teachers Your School's Poverty Status: Medium-Low Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor's Degree Percentage of teachers with at least a Master's Degree Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes taught by properly certified teachers Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught by teachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure Your School Lead or Senior Teachers: 0.0 90.7 46.6 0 100 0 Your District -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 Number of Teachers by Program Area General Education Teachers 16.5 Career-Technical Teachers 2.0 Special Education Teachers 3.0 Teacher Aides 0.0 7.3 Gifted Intervention Specialists 0.0 Fine Arts Teachers 1.0 Music Teachers 0.5 Physical Education Teachers 1.0 ELL Specialists 0.0 # State Avg per 1000 Students 46.8 2.3 10.9 0.6 3.0 2.5 2.8 0.3 A district's high-poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile or in neither quartile. = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group Page 23 of 25
Teacher Evaluations Fine Arts Courses Offered No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. No Fine Arts courses offered by this school. 14.3% 85.7% Accomplished Skilled Developing Ineffective Not Complete Wellness and Physical Education The extent to which students are successful in meeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's physical education standards Moderate Success Elected to administer BMI screening Participation in Physical Activity Pilot Program Page 24 of 25
Financial Data These measures answer several questions about spending and performance. How much is spent on Classroom instruction? How much, on average, is spent on each student? What is the source of the revenue? How do these measures compare to other districts and schools? Comparison Group: No Comparison Group Classroom Spending Data Spending per Pupil Data School State What percent of funds are spent on classroom instruction? 73.1% Operating Spending per Pupil Classroom Instruction $8,992 $9,149 $6,573 $6,181 School District State Non-Classroom Spending $2,419 $2,968 26.9% 26.9% 32.4% 73.1% 69.7% 67.6% School $6,573 $2,419 Classroom Instruction Non-Classroom Instruction State $6,181 $2,968 $0 $4,000 $8,000 $12,000 Page 25 of 25