Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Similar documents
Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Shelters Elementary School

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Data Diskette & CD ROM

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Educational Attainment

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

African American Male Achievement Update

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

John F. Kennedy Middle School

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Bellehaven Elementary

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report


Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

46 Children s Defense Fund

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

University of Arizona

Transportation Equity Analysis

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Best Colleges Main Survey

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Kahului Elementary School

Executive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Review of Student Assessment Data

Raw Data Files Instructions

State of New Jersey

LIM College New York, NY

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Pathways to College Preparatory Advanced Academic Offerings in the Anchorage School District

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Executive Summary. Gautier High School

World s Best Workforce Plan

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Financing Education In Minnesota

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

Executive Summary. Hamilton High School

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

FLORIDA. -Mindingall. Portilla Dr. Wilbert. endent of School. Superinte. Associate Curriculum. Assistant

12-month Enrollment

FTE General Instructions

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Hokulani Elementary School

El Toro Elementary School

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

Transcription:

213-214 Report Card for Northwest High School SCHOOL DISTRICT Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question How well did students do on the state test? COMPONENT Progress This is your school s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. Did the students get a year s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less? Performance Index Value Added 88.%... B Overall...... Indicators Met Gifted... 1... A Students with Disabilities...... Lowest 2% in Achievement... COMPONENT Gap Closing This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, ethnicity, or disability? COMPONENT Graduation Rate This grade answers the question How many ninth graders graduate in four years or five years? COMPONENT Annual Measurable Objectives 1... A... Graduation Rates 97.5% of students graduated in 4 years... 97.7% of students graduated in 5 years... A A K-3 Literacy This grade answers the question Are more students learning to read in kindergarten through third grade? COMPONENT Prepared for Success This grade answers the question Are students who graduate from your district ready for college or a career? There are many ways to show that graduates are prepared. COMPONENT K-3 Literacy Improvement...... Page 1 of 19

26.3 31.6 38.6 25. 39.9 31.4 27.8 35.5 32.8 36.8 31.3 29.6 36.5 34.9 3.6 3. 213-214 Report Card for Northwest High School Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question How well did students do on the state test? COMPONENT B Performance Index The Performance Index measures the test results of every student, not just those who score proficient or higher. There are six levels on the index and districts receive points for every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the more the points awarded in the district's index. This rewards schools and districts for improving performance. 12 Performance Index Trend Performance Index 4 6 2 8 1 Achievement Level Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Untested Pct of Students. 3.4 31.8 3.6 5. 1.8.4 x x x x x x x Points for this Level 1.3 1.2 1.1 1..6.3. = = = = = = = Points Received. 36.5 34.9 3.6 3..5. 15.6 1 8 6 11.9 11.7 11.7 13. 15.6 88.% 15.6 of a possible 12. A = 9. - 1 B = 8. - 89.9% C = 7. - 79.9% D = 5. - 69.9% F =. - 49.9% 3.6 1.8 5..4 31.8 3.4 Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Limited Basic Untested 4 2 4.8 4.5 4.5 4.3.7.9 1.1 1.1......5 21 211 212 213 214 Untested Limited Basic Proficient Accelerated Advanced Page 2 of 19

A Indicators Met Indicators Met measures the percent of students who have passed state tests. Test results are reported for each student in a grade and subject. At least 8 percent of students must pass to get credit for the indicator. Indicators Met % 1 1 out of 1 4 6 A = B = C = D = F = 9. - 1 8. - 89.9% 7. - 79.9% 5. - 69.9%. - 49.9% 2 8 1 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Ohio Graduation Test Mathematics 3rd Grade Reading Mathematics 4th This Grade school Readingdoes not have Mathematics enough test results in 3rd, 5th Grade Reading Science 4th, or 5th grade to display this table. Mathematics 6th Grade Reading Mathematics 7th This Grade school Readingdoes not have Mathematics enough test results in 6th, 8th Grade Reading Science 7th, or 8th grade to display this table. OGT, 1th Graders Mathematics Reading Science Social Studies 94.8% 96.3% 86.7% 92.6% Writing 95.6% Mathematics 96.2% Reading 96.2% OGT, 11th Graders Science 92.4% Social Studies 93.% Writing 96.8% Page 3 of 19

Achievement Levels by Grade Proficient Percent Trend by Grade 1th Grade OGT 1th Grade OGT 1% 96.3% 95.6% 94.8% 96.3% 96% 95.6% 94.8% 92% 88% 84% 8% 76% 88.5% 87.2% 92.6% 92.6% 86.7% 86.7% 81.6% 82.2% 76.7% Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science School District State Average 1% 96% 92% 88% 84% 8% 21 211 212 213 214 Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science 11th Grade Cumulative OGT 11th Grade Cumulative OGT 98% 96.2% 96.8% 96.2% 96.2% 96.8% 96.2% 96% 93.% 92.4% 94% 93.% 93.% 91.9% 92.4% 92% 9% 89.6% 88.8% 88% 86% 85.8% 84% Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science School District State Average 1% 98% 96% 94% 92% 9% 88% 21 211 212 213 214 Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science Page 4 of 19

Gifted Students The Gifted Students data and Indicator highlight the opportunities for and performance of gifted students. The dashboard answers several questions: How many students are identified as gifted and in what categories? How many of those students are receiving gifted services? How well are those gifted students performing? The Gifted Indicator measures whether opportunity and performance expectations are being met for gifted students. INDICATOR 215 Gifted Summary Achievement This chart illustrates the test achievement levels by students identified as gifted in that test's subject. For example, how well do students identified as gifted in Reading do on the state Reading tests? Students Identified as Gifted 15.1% of enrollment 84.9% 1% 9% 8% 7% 8.6% 9.1% 8.3% 9.1% 16.7% 28.6% Students Receiving Gifted Services 4.8% of enrollment 4.8% 1.4% 6% 5% 4% 1 81.8% 75.% 3% 62.9% 2% 1% Identified as Gifted, Not Receiving Services Not Identified as Gifted Receiving Gifted Services % Reading Math Science Social Studies Advanced Accelerated Proficient Value-Added Value-Added measures the progress for all students identified as gifted in reading, math, and/or superior cognitive ability. Performance Index This chart compares the Performance Index of students identified as gifted to those not identified as gifted. Gifted Non-Gifted 115.1 14. Page 5 of 19

Enrollment by Gifted Category These charts show the percentage of enrolled students that are identified as gifted and that are receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 4.5% 4.% 3.5% 3.% 2.5% 2.% 1.5% 1.%.5%.4% Creative Thinking 4.4% Math 2.8% 2.5% 1.1% Reading 1.8% Science.5%.2% Social Studies 1.6%.9%.2% Visual and Performing Arts Superior Cognitive No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. This chart cannot be displayed because there were not enough students to evaluate. Identified Receiving Services Grades 4-8 Grades 9-12 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. This chart cannot be displayed because there were not enough students to evaluate. 4.5% 4.% 3.5% 3.% 2.5% 2.% 1.5% 1.%.5%.4% Creative Thinking 4.4% Math 2.8% 2.5% 1.1% Reading 1.8% Science.5%.2% Social Studies 1.6%.9%.2% Visual and Performing Arts Superior Cognitive Identified Receiving Services Page 6 of 19

Identified and Receiving Services These charts show, of the students identified as gifted, the percentage of students receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 7 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. 6 5 4 64.% 42.8% 55.6% This chart cannot be displayed because there were not enough students to evaluate. 3 33.3% 2 1 Creative Thinking Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Visual and Performing Arts Grades 4-8 Grades 9-12 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. 7 This chart cannot be displayed because there were not enough students to evaluate. 6 5 4 3 2 64.% 42.8% 33.3% 55.6% 1 Creative Thinking Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Visual and Performing Arts Page 7 of 19

Progress This is your school s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. It answers the question Did the students get a year s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less? COMPONENT Overall This measures the progress for all students in math and reading, grades 4-8. Gifted Students This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading, math, and/or superior cognitive ability. Students in the Lowest 2% in Achievement This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 2% statewide in reading and math achievement. Progress Details This table shows the Progress scores by test grade and subject, and includes up to three years of data as available. No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. Value Added data is not available for this school Students with Disabilities This measures the progress for students with disabilities. Coming in 215 High School A High School measure of progress will be reported in the 214-15 school year. Although Progress scores are not assigned letter grades at this level of detail, the grading scale applied at the Overall (All Students, All Tests) level is: A = 2. and up B = 1. to 1.99 C = -1. to.99 D = -2. to -1.1 F = below -2. High Mobility For districts and schools with a mobility rate of 25% or higher, this measures the progress of a subset of students that have been in the district for at least two years. This measure will not be included in the Progress component grade. Page 8 of 19

Gap Closing This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, ethnicity, or disability? COMPONENT A Annual Measurable Objectives Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of student groups to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achieves that goal in reading, math and graduation and emphasize any achievement gaps that exist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels. Reading Math Graduation Rate AMO Points 2 4 6 8 96.9 96.8 97.5 1 1 1 A = 9. - 1 B = 8. - 89.9% C = 7. - 79.9% D = 6. - 69.9% F =. - 59.9% 96.3 9.6 95.3 94.8 97.4 97.2 2 4 6 8 1 2 4 6 8 1 2 4 6 8 1 White Econ Disadvantage All Students Econ Disadvantage All Students The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 214 AMO for Reading is 84.9%, for Math is 8.5%, and for Graduation Rate is 78.2%. Subgroups with fewer than 3 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs. White All Students Econ Disadvantage White Page 9 of 19

Graduation Rate This grade represents the percentage of students whom entered the 9th grade and graduated 4 and 5 years later. COMPONENT 4-Year Graduation Rate The 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 213 who graduated within four years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 21 and graduated by 213. 4-Year Rate 5-Year Rate A 97.5% A = 93. - 1 B = 89. - 92.9% C = 84. - 88.9% D = 79. - 83.9% F =. - 78.9% 2 4 6 8 1 1 8 6 97.5 97.5 82.2 1 8 6 97.7 97.7 83.8 5-Year Graduation Rate The 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 212 who graduated within five years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 29 and graduated by 213. A 97.7% A = 95. - 1 B = 9. - 94.9% C = 85. - 89.9% D = 8. - 84.9% F =. - 79.9% 2 4 6 8 1 4 2 School State Average District 4 2 School State Average District Page 1 of 19

Graduation Rate Trend 99% 98% 97% 97.7% 97.5% 96% 95% 94.7% 94% 93.9% 93% 92% 92.5% 91.9% 91% 9.8% 9% 21 211 212 213 4-Year 5-Year Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because the necessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year. Page 11 of 19

K-3 Literacy This grade answers the question - Are more students learning to read in kindergarten through third grade? COMPONENT K-3 Literacy Improvement This data is not displayed because there are not enough 4students 6 to evaluate. 2 8 1 out of A = 81.2-1 B = 62.2-81.1% C = 43.2-62.1% D = 24.3-43.1% F =. - 24.2% < 1 kindergarten students were not ontrack last year. of those students improved to ontrack in 1st grade. < 1 < 1 In Your School... K-3 Literacy first was grade not students calculated were not ontrack last there year. were not enough for this < 1 school because of those students improved to on- students to evaluate. track in 2nd grade. second grade students were not on-track last year. of those students improved to ontrack in 3rd grade. third grade students were not ontrack this year. of those students reached proficiency on the 3rd grade OAA. Not On-Track at Point A Kindergarten Reading Diagnostic, School Year 212-213 1st Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year 212-213 2nd Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year 212-213 3rd Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year 213-214 Details of Measure < 1 to < 1 to < 1 to < 1 to Improving to On-Track at Point B 1st Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year 213-214 2nd Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year 213-214 3rd Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year 213-214 3rd Grade Reading OAA, School Year 213-214 Deduction for 3rd graders who did not pass OAA and were not on a Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plan < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 Totals <1 <1 Page 12 of 19

Kindergarten Diagnostic First Grade Diagnostic Second Grade Diagnostic Third Grade Diagnostic Percentage On-Track in Reading Diagnostic K-3 Literacy was not calculated for this school because there were not enough students to evaluate. -8% -4% % 4% 8% On-Track Not On-Track Third Grade Reading Guarantee Ohio's Third Grade Reading Guarantee ensures that students are successful in reading before moving on to fourth grade. Schools must provide supports for struggling readers in early grades. If a child appears to be falling behind in reading, the school will immediately start a Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plan. The program ensures that every struggling reader gets the support he or she needs to learn and achieve. Students have multiple opportunities to meet promotion requirements including meeting a minimum promotion score on the third grade state reading tests given in the fall and spring. Students have an additional opportunity to take the state assessment in the summer, as well as a district-determined alternative assessment. The Parent Roadmap is available to help parents understand how the Third Grade Reading Guarantee applies to your child. How many third graders met the Third Grade Reading Guarantee requirements for promotion to 4th grade? This chart shows the overall percentage of students that were on-track/not-on-track for each grade level reading diagnostic in 2,13-2,14. How many third graders scored proficient on the state Reading test? Page 13 of 19

Prepared for Success This grade answers the question Are students who graduate from your school ready for college or a career? There are many ways to show that graduates are prepared. COMPONENT How Prepared was Your 213 Graduating Class? Outcomes after High School Graduation ACT: Participation ACT: Remediation Free SAT: Participation 3.1% 29.4% 71.3% Districts and schools have long-term impacts on student outcomes. The Prepared for Success component provides information on how schools prepare students for different pathways of college and career success. It also provides insights on how those students do once they leave high school. What happens beyond the diploma is an important indicator of how well schools are preparing students. SAT: Remediation Free Honors Diploma Industry-Recognized Credential 1.9% 15.% The University System of Ohio provides district reports on enrollment and remediation of high school graduates attending in-state, public colleges and universities. Additional data on outcomes after high school are coming soon. These will include college graduation, demographics of college enrollees, workforce and military enlistment. Advanced Placement: Participation 29.4% AP: Exam Score of 3 or Better 28.1% Dual Enrollment Credit 2.5% International Baccalaureate IB: Exam Score of 4 or Better % 2% 4% 6% 8% 1% Note: These data represent students in the 4-year graduation rate, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 21. Data used in generating the ACT and SAT Remediation Free, AP Exam, IB Exam, and Dual Enrollment Credit measures for the 213 graduating class were not reported to the Ohio Department of Education by districts. To confirm the information on this page and get a complete picture of the work your district is doing to prepare students for college and career success, please contact your district directly. Page 14 of 19

Principal: Address: Eric C. Bornstine 858 Erie Ave NW Canal Fulton OH 44614-9363 Phone: (33) 854-225 Directory information current as of the 213-214 Report Card publication date. Your School's Students Average Daily Enrollment: Enrollment by Subgroup 12% 55 Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Enrollment # Enrollment % 1% 95.3% Number of Limited English Proficiency Students Excluded from Accountability Calculations: Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged 524 88 139 95.3% 15.9% 25.2% 8% 6% 4% 2% 15.9% 25.2% -- Limited English Proficiency Migrant % = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group State and federal law require an annual assessment of Limited English Proficient (LEP) students to measure their English language proficiency. The Ohio Test of English Language Acquisition (OTELA) is the assessment used in Ohio to gauge LEP students' growth in learning English. For information about your district's OTELA results, see the Department of Education's web site at http://education.ohio.gov. American Indian or Alaska... Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Migrant Economic Disadvantage Limited English Proficiency Page 15 of 19

Attendance Rate Chronic Absenteeism Rate: 16.4% All Students 94.5% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic 94.5% Students with Disabilities 93.2% Economic Disadvantage 91.5% Limited English Proficiency Migrant Male 94.5% Female 94.5% = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group 93.2% 94.5% 1 94.5% 94.5% 93.2% 94.5% 8 6 4 2 All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Female Students with Disabilities Migrant Asian or Pacific Islander Economic Disadvantage Male Attendance Rate is not shown if enrollment is less than 1. Page 16 of 19

Mobility Rates by Subgroup Student Mobility % All Students Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficiency Migrant = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group 6% A mobility rate chart cannot be displayed for this school because either there are not enough % students to evaluate in any subgroup or all calculated results are. 4% 2% -2% -4% -6% All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Economic Disadvantage Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Students with Disabilities Migrant White, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Multiracial Page 17 of 19

Your School's Teachers Number of Teachers by Program Area Your School's Poverty Status: Low Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor's Degree Percentage of teachers with at least a Master's Degree Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes taught by properly certified teachers Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught by teachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure Your School 1. Lead or Senior Teachers:. 72.3 1 Your District 1. 72.1 1. General Education 24.2 Gifted and Talented. Career-Technical Programs 1. Art Education K-8. Music Education K-8 1. Physical Education K-8. ELL Instructional Program. Special Education 3.8 A district's high-poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile or in neither quartile. = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group Wellness and Physical Education The extent to which students are successful in meeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's physical education standards Moderate Success Fine Arts Courses Offered Course Subject Ceramics Drawing and Painting Instrumental Music Music Appreciation Visual Art (K-12) Vocal/Choral Music Page 18 of 19

Financial Data These measures answer several questions about spending and performance. How much is spent on Classroom instruction? How much, on average, is spent on each student? What is the source of the revenue? How do these measures compare to other districts and schools? Comparison Group: No Comparison Group Classroom Spending Data Spending per Pupil Data School State What percent of funds are spent on classroom instruction? 72.3% Operating Spending per Pupil Classroom Instruction $8,291 $9,189 $5,997 $6,192 School District State Non-Classroom Spending $2,294 $2,998 27.7% 27.7% 32.6% 72.3% 61.7% 67.4% School $5,997 $2,294 Classroom Instruction Non-Classroom Instruction State $6,192 $2,998 $ $4, $8, $12, Page 19 of 19